| # Second annotation round |
|
|
| Purpose: measure how reliable the role labels are by having an independent person |
| label a sample and comparing. |
|
|
| 1. Read `../ANNOTATION_GUIDELINES.md`. Do **not** open `../data/roles/labels.*`, |
| `../results/` or any tool output until you have finished. |
| 2. Open `round-2/sample.csv` (150 types, in a fixed random order). For each row, |
| follow `url` to the file at its commit and fill `role` with one of |
| `entry client service domain persistence event config none`; add a `note` when |
| the decision is not obvious. |
| 3. Save the file and run `python3 scripts/kappa.py annotation/round-2/sample.csv` |
| from the repository root. It prints the agreement, Cohen's kappa and the |
| disagreements. |
| 4. The two annotators discuss the disagreements; corrected labels and the |
| agreement figures go into the next release (see CHANGELOG.md). |
|
|
| The sample is drawn in proportion to each project's labels, by a seeded hash, so it |
| can be regenerated with `node build/build.js roles`. |
|
|
