The dataset could not be loaded because the splits use different data file formats, which is not supported. Read more about the splits configuration. Click for more details.
Error code: FileFormatMismatchBetweenSplitsError
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
BioCellAI
Foundations — a research toolkit for controlled cell–text representation learning.
BioCellAI investigates whether aligning single-cell expression profiles with biological text improves generalization to unseen donors beyond equivalent non-text supervision — and how much of any improvement survives controls for cell composition, region, and cohort.
The core comparison is deliberately strict: same cells, same labels, same encoder, same training budget — biological text versus non-text supervision of equivalent strength.
This is an independent implementation of the research questions described for CellOLMo (Ai2 × Allen Institute): open language models × single-cell brain data on SEA-AD, evaluated on held-out donors across cell, region, and donor levels. See docs/cellolmo-alignment.md for the artifact-level mapping to that agenda. Not affiliated with Ai2 or the Allen Institute.
Status
Research alpha. The data-preparation and evaluation infrastructure is
implemented and tested; the corrected v2 benchmark is still being executed.
The public repository is alrobles/biocellAI (tagged v0.1.0-alpha as an
infrastructure snapshot) and the Python package is biocellai;
Foundations is the codename for this infrastructure stage, not a
publication claim.
| Capability | State |
|---|---|
| Donor-level splits, train-only HVG selection, counts validation | Implemented; tested on synthetic data |
| Immutable fold builder with manifests, hashes, donor/gene lists | Implemented |
| Train-only PCA, feature scaling, ridge readouts | Implemented |
| Paired bootstrap and exact gate utilities | Implemented |
| One-hot / random-prototype supervision controls | Implemented as components |
| Integrated v2 runner (all control arms, equivalent budgets) | Pending |
| Corrected real-cohort benchmarks (blood, SEA-AD, ROSMAP) | Pending |
| Strict source-fitted cross-cohort transfer | Pending |
| Blinded biological caption review | Pending |
Full task registry and dependencies:
spec/revalidation_tasks.json —
python scripts/revalidation_status.py prints the live state.
Installation
Requires Python ≥ 3.11. From source:
git clone https://github.com/alrobles/biocellAI
cd biocellAI
python -m venv .venv && . .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e ".[dev,data,text]"
pytest -q # 74 tests
Extras: data (scanpy/anndata/cellxgene-census), text
(sentence-transformers; downloads encoder weights on first use), dev.
Quickstart: v2 fold preparation
scripts/v2_prepare.py builds immutable donor-held-out folds from a verified
count matrix. With any AnnData .h5ad whose X (or a named layer) contains
raw counts and obs["donor_id"] identifies donors:
python scripts/v2_prepare.py \
--input cohort.h5ad --counts-layer X \
--cohort seaad --source-release "SEA-AD MTG 2024" \
--seeds 0 1 2 --out experiments/v2_revalidation/seaad_run1
Each run writes fold_s*.h5ad plus per-fold JSON manifests (source hash,
environment versions, code hashes, donor/gene lists, matrix hash) and refuses
to overwrite an existing --out directory. Prepared ≠ evaluated: the
PREPARED.json marker records scientific_results_complete: false.
Synthetic smoke test without real data:
python - <<'PY'
import numpy as np, pandas as pd
from anndata import AnnData
rng = np.random.default_rng(0)
AnnData(
X=rng.poisson(3.0, (80, 400)).astype(np.float32),
obs=pd.DataFrame({"donor_id": np.repeat([f"d{i}" for i in range(8)], 10)}),
var=pd.DataFrame(index=[f"g{i}" for i in range(400)]),
).write_h5ad("/tmp/synth.h5ad")
PY
python scripts/v2_prepare.py --input /tmp/synth.h5ad --counts-layer X \
--cohort synthetic --source-release local --seeds 0 --out /tmp/v2_folds
A historical end-to-end pipeline check exists (python -m biocellai.experiment m1 --dataset pbmc3k), but its PBMC donor IDs are randomly assigned pseudo-donors:
it exercises code paths only and demonstrates nothing about generalization.
Input requirements
- Counts:
Xor a named layer must contain nonnegative, integer-valued counts. Numerical checks do not establish provenance — you must identify which layer holds verified raw counts. Preprocessed inputs (existinglog1pstate) are rejected. - Donors:
obs["donor_id"]is required; splits are donor-level and unified across seeds (split_donor_ids). - Genes: unique identifiers; symbol mapping via
data/gene_aliases.json. - HVGs are selected on train donors only; normalization happens before
the gene subset; the fold records
biocellai_data_stateand protocol metadata inuns.
Workflow
verified counts → v2_prepare (frozen folds + manifests)
→ v2 runner (text arms + equivalent-supervision controls) [pending]
→ inductive readouts (train-fit PCA/scaler/ridge)
→ paired comparisons, permutations, exact gates
All scientific outputs go under experiments/v2_revalidation/<run-id>/.
Historical experiments/m* directories are preserved read-only in spirit:
the tooling refuses to overwrite prepared outputs, and historical runners
now reject renormalizing processed files.
Scientific scope and limitations
- Grounding where a caption is assigned to a cell by its label is text-mediated supervision, not label-free learning — even when the text is external knowledge or omits the class name. The interesting question is what biological text adds beyond equivalent supervision; that is what the pending control arms measure.
- Historical M0–M12 results are exploratory. The audit found repeated preprocessing, transductive components, and non-equivalent comparisons; see docs/milestones.md for the full log and caveats.
- Nothing here is a claim that text helps, that composition explains the pathology axis, or that encoder scale is irrelevant — those are open questions the v2 matrix is designed to answer.
- Cross-sectional postmortem pseudoprogression scores are not longitudinal trajectories.
Data and artifacts
- Included: dataset manifests, gene aliases, retrieval corpora
(
data/retrieval/), captions/provenance (data/text/), specs, ADRs, code, tests, and historical milestone reports. - Not included: raw single-cell datasets (Tabula Sapiens, SEA-AD, ROSMAP), model checkpoints, or large embeddings — these live on KU HPC and are subject to their own access terms. No large data or weights are stored in git.
- The
m1pipeline check downloadspbmc3kand a text encoder on first run. - Released artifacts: captions, retrieval corpora, manifests, and docs are on
Hugging Face at
alrobles/biocellai-foundations(uploaded viascripts/hf_release.py— whitelist packaging + secret scan).
Documentation
spec/00-spec.md— project specificationspec/adr/— architecture decision recordsspec/adr/ADR-011-scientific-revalidation.md— v2 protocolspec/revalidation_tasks.json— task registry (scripts/revalidation_status.py)docs/milestones.md— historical M0–M13 logdocs/cellolmo-alignment.md— mapping to the CellOLMo research agendadocs/historical-results.md— honest review of exploratory resultsdocs/release-plan.md— weights/data release plan and license stackpaper/— manuscript (provisional; full rewrite pending v2 evidence)scripts/slurm/— version-controlled KU HPC jobs
License and citation
Code and released model weights are Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE);
project-generated captions, retrieval corpora, and manifests are
CC-BY-4.0 (see NOTICE). Third-party datasets keep their own terms —
controlled-access data are not redistributed. Per-artifact release
permissions are tracked in R7-LICENSE and
docs/release-plan.md. If you use this repository in
work leading to a publication, cite it via the archived DOI
(10.5281/zenodo.23103004) and note
the Foundations codename.
Credits / context
Developed within the alrobles ecosystem: KU HPC, Apptainer, Ollama, PubMed
indexing (genominer), and spec-driven development under spec/.
- Downloads last month
- 119