Narrative-Infilling / README.md
anonymous12341952's picture
Update README.md
32686b4 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
7.43 kB
metadata
license: other
task_categories:
  - text-generation
  - fill-mask
tags:
  - narrative infilling
  - text infilling
  - story understanding
  - benchmark
  - language model evaluation
language:
  - en
pretty_name: NarrativeInfilling-Benchmark
size_categories:
  - 1K<n<10K
rai:dataLimitations:
  - The dataset is English only and does not support multilingual evaluation
  - >-
    The benchmark spans four narrative domains; generalization to other genres
    or text types is not guaranteed
  - >-
    Missing spans are contiguous sentence sequences of one to three sentences;
    non-contiguous or stylistic gaps are not covered
  - >-
    Benchmark instances are drawn from publicly available corpora and may
    overlap with LLM pretraining data, though contamination analysis shows fewer
    than 0.15% of model responses exhibit near-verbatim reproduction
rai:dataBiases:
  - >-
    Source corpora reflect the demographic and cultural biases present in
    Wikipedia, CNN/DailyMail, ROCStories, and SIND
  - News articles (CNN/DailyMail) may contain temporal and political biases
  - >-
    Commonsense stories (ROCStories) reflect everyday scenarios predominantly
    from Western cultural contexts
  - >-
    Visual narratives (SIND) are grounded in Flickr image captions and may
    reflect photographer and platform biases
rai:personalSensitiveInformation:
  - All documents are drawn from publicly available sources
  - No individual personal identifiers are intentionally included
  - >-
    Users should screen for personally identifiable information before
    redistribution or downstream use
rai:dataUseCases:
  - >-
    Evaluating narrative infilling capabilities of instruction-tuned language
    models
  - >-
    Benchmarking automatic and qualitative evaluation metrics for text
    generation
  - >-
    Studying the effect of prompt design and reasoning guidance on narrative
    reconstruction
  - >-
    Use cases for which validity has not been established include open-domain
    generation, multilingual infilling, and non-narrative text reconstruction
prov:wasDerivedFrom:
  - name: Wikipedia
    url: https://huggingface.co/datasets/wikimedia/wikipedia
  - name: CNN/DailyMail
    url: https://huggingface.co/datasets/abisee/cnn_dailymail
  - name: ROCStories
    url: https://cs.rochester.edu/nlp/rocstories/
  - name: SIND (Sequential Image Narrative Dataset)
    url: https://visionandlanguage.net/VIST/dataset.html
prov:wasGeneratedBy:
  - name: Data Collection
    description: >
      Narratives were sampled from four publicly available datasets spanning 
      encyclopedic text (Wikipedia), news articles (CNN/DailyMail), commonsense 
      stories (ROCStories), and visual narratives (SIND). Narratives were
      filtered  to ensure a minimum length suitable for span masking.
  - name: Span Masking
    description: >
      One to three contiguous sentences were masked from each narrative to
      create  infilling instances. Blank positions (opening, middle, closing)
      were  systematically varied to ensure balanced coverage across narrative
      positions.  The masked span serves as the gold answer for evaluation.
  - name: Quality Filtering
    description: >
      Instances were filtered to remove duplicates and narratives where masking 
      produced degenerate or trivially short contexts.

Dataset Card for NarrativeInfilling Benchmark

Dataset Details

Dataset Description

The Narrative Infilling Benchmark is a large-scale evaluation dataset for narrative infilling the task of generating a missing span within a narrative while maintaining consistency with both the preceding and following context. The benchmark spans four narrative domains and contains 9,142 instances with systematic variation in blank position and span length, enabling controlled evaluation of language model infilling capabilities.

Each instance provides a narrative with one masked span (indicated by ____) and the corresponding gold answer. The benchmark is designed to evaluate instruction-tuned LLMs under varying prompt specificity and reasoning guidance.

Uses

Direct Use

  • Narrative infilling evaluation: Assess how well LLMs reconstruct missing narrative spans across diverse genres and blank positions.
  • Prompt sensitivity analysis: Study the effect of instruction specificity and reasoning paradigms on Story Completion.
  • Metric evaluation: Benchmark automatic metrics against qualitative human judgments for narrative infilling tasks.

Out-of-Scope Use

  • Not suitable for training language models directly without appropriate data splits to prevent leakage.
  • Not suitable for factual question answering or non-narrative text reconstruction.

Dataset Structure

Format: Single CSV file.

Fields

Column Description
dataset Source domain: wikipedia, cnn_dailymail, roc, sind
ref_id Integer reference ID for the instance (0–999 per dataset)
source_text Full narrative text
problem The infilling problem presented to the model with masked span indicated by ____
gold_answer The original masked span serving as the reference answer
n Number of sentences in the masked span (1, 2, or 3)
unit_idx Position index of the masked span within the narrative

Splits

The dataset is distributed as a single file. Users can split by dataset column for domain-specific evaluation or by unit_idx for position-specific analysis.

Dataset Creation

Curation Rationale

No existing benchmark directly evaluates LLM narrative infilling across multiple genres with controlled variation in blank position and span length. This benchmark fills that gap by providing a standardized multi-domain evaluation setting for narrative reconstruction.

Source Data

Instances were derived from four publicly available datasets:

Domain Source Narrative Type
wikipedia Wikipedia Encyclopedic text
cnn_dailymail CNN/DailyMail News articles
roc ROCStories Commonsense stories
sind SIND Sequential Image Narrative Dataset

Annotation Process

No additional human annotation was performed during dataset construction. The gold answers are the original masked sentences from the source texts. Human evaluation of model outputs was conducted separately using a five-dimensional qualitative rubric (Fluency, Context Faithfulness, Bidirectional Coherence, Narrative Consistency, Informativeness) as described in the accompanying paper.

Bias, Risks, and Limitations

  • Domain shift: Performance varies substantially across domains; models strong on CNN/DailyMail may not generalize to SIND.
  • Pretraining overlap: Source corpora are publicly available and may appear in LLM pretraining data. Contamination analysis in the accompanying paper shows a very small fraction of responses exhibit near-verbatim reproduction.
  • Contiguous spans only: Real-world narrative gaps may involve non-contiguous or stylistic missing content not covered by this benchmark.

Citation

@inproceedings{narrativeinfilling2025,
  title  = {Evaluating Narrative Infilling in Large Language Models},
  year   = {2025},
}

More Information

This release supports the reproducibility of the results reported in the accompanying paper. The benchmark data, evaluation code, and model outputs are publicly available in the accompanying repository.