text stringlengths 0 145k |
|---|
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018820 |
" |
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027193.txt,"Time: 03/01/17 04:45:15 AM (510065115) |
Flags: 1060865 |
Is Read: Yes |
Is Invitation: No |
GUID: D79S5CSCB-2EC2-4082-BCS5D-23939C85878B |
Message: So they will rally |
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com |
Time: 03/01/17 05:10:11 AM (510066611) |
Flags: 1085445 |
Is Read: No |
Is Invitation: No |
GUID: C84121CF-45C6-483D-B6B4-085595A43BC5 |
Message: HSN health security number |
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com |
Time: 03/01/17 05:13:24 AM (510066804) |
Flags: 1085445 |
Is Read: No |
Is Invitation: No |
GUID: 315CC679-0793-4DA2-A3EE-FBIAD7EBIE61 |
Message: in fact embed the social number in the new encrypted personal health seciurty number . think of how |
outdated a social security number is for “ security “ , that a fun idea |
Sender: |
Time: 03/01/17 06:30:00 AM (510071400) |
Flags: 1060865 |
Is Read: Yes |
Is Invitation: No |
GUID: 24FC9CAD-9BE1-42B7-A7C4-CE8F79DDD8A9 |
Message: Yes |
Sender: |
Time: 03/01/17 06:30:03 AM (510071403) |
Flags: 1060865 |
Is Read: Yes |
Is Invitation: No |
GUID: FA11432F-2EEB-4884-9B34-EAF54D 1 C6680 |
Message: Start w health |
Sender: a |
Time: 03/01/17 06:33:58 AM (510071638) |
Flags: 1060865 |
Is Read: Yes |
Is Invitation: No |
GUID: 2A4530E0-A455-4025-9F00-0D358355C834 |
Message: The magic is to make all the systems communicate |
Time: 0 ""38:27 AM (510071907) |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027193 |
" |
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014855.txt,"Case 9:0€-ase8D T5é6cK AWK 3B RU BenDs6edmémieieh bh ALB De/dk4i 04/BAGH15 oP&ébe 9 of 10 |
id. at 10). Petitioners do not contend that Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4’s “participation in this |
case” can only be achieved by listing them as parties. |
As it stands under the original petition, the merits of this case will be decided based on a |
determination of whether the Government violated the rights of Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and all |
“other similarly situated victims” under the CVRA. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 may offer |
relevant, admissible, and non-cumulative evidence that advances that determination, but their |
participation as listed parties is not necessary in that regard. See Herring, 894 F.2d at 1024 |
(District court did not abuse its discretion by denying amendment where “addition of more |
plaintiffs .. . would not have affected the issues underlying the grant of summary judgment.”’); cf. |
Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under Rule 15, “courts have held |
that leave to amend to assert a claim already at issue in [another lawsuit] should not be granted if |
the same parties are involved, the same substantive claim is raised, and the same relief is |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.