azza1625's picture
Update README.md
d9bf268 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
10.1 kB
---
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- text-classification
- token-classification
- text-generation
task_ids:
- multi-class-classification
language:
- en
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
pretty_name: CreateDebate Arguments Full Raw Dump
tags:
- debate
- argumentation
- argument-mining
- stance-detection
- user-generated-content
- research-only
viewer: false
extra_gated_prompt: >-
⚠️ CONTENT WARNING — PLEASE READ BEFORE REQUESTING ACCESS
This dataset is a raw, **unfiltered** archive of arguments from the (now
defunct) CreateDebate platform. It contains debates on extremely
controversial and potentially disturbing topics, including but not limited
to: pedophilia, bestiality, rape and sexual violence, suicide and
self-harm, hate speech directed at racial, religious, ethnic, and LGBTQ+
groups, graphic violence, and conspiracy/extremist rhetoric. Some
arguments express views that the dataset authors find abhorrent. The
dataset is released *as-is* to support academic research in computational
argumentation; inclusion of any content is not endorsement.
By requesting access you confirm that:
- You are using this dataset for academic or research purposes only.
- You will not redistribute the dataset or any substantial portion of it.
- You understand the dataset contains content that may be disturbing.
- You will not use this dataset to train systems intended to generate,
promote, or amplify the kinds of harmful content it documents.
- You will cite the accompanying paper and the Zenodo DOI in any work
derived from this dataset.
extra_gated_fields:
Full name: text
Affiliation: text
Country: country
Intended research use (1-3 sentences): text
I agree to the terms above: checkbox
extra_gated_button_content: Request access
---
# CreateDebate Arguments — Full Raw Dump
> ⚠️ **Content warning.** This dataset contains user-generated arguments on
> extremely controversial topics including pedophilia, bestiality, rape,
> self-harm, hate speech, and graphic violence. It is released unfiltered for
> research purposes. See the "Considerations for Using the Data" section
> below. The dataset viewer is disabled by design.
## Dataset Description
### Dataset Summary
This dataset is the **complete raw archive** of arguments collected from
CreateDebate (createdebate.com, since taken down), comprising **383,220
arguments** across the platform's `for/against` debates. It is released to
support reproducible research in computational argumentation, argument
mining, stance detection, and online discourse analysis.
A separately released, manually-curated subset of ~84k arguments from 500
debates with sensitive topics removed is available at
[`azza1625/createdebate-arguments`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/azza1625/createdebate-arguments).
**That curated subset, not this one, is the appropriate choice for most
downstream applications.** This full dump exists for researchers who need
the raw distribution — for example to study how argumentative structure
varies across topic sensitivity, or to develop content moderation tools.
### Supported Tasks
- **Stance detection** — arguments carry an explicit `argumentSide` label
- **Argument quality assessment** — community vote scores per argument
- **Argument mining and discourse structure** — full tree structure preserved
- **Computational rhetoric and topic-conditioned analysis**
- **Robustness / safety evaluation** — content moderation, toxicity detection
### Languages
Primarily English (`en`). User text is preserved as-written; spelling and
grammar quality varies.
## Dataset Structure
### Files
| File | Format | Purpose |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------|--------------------------|
| `data/train-00000-of-00001.parquet` | Parquet | Full dataset, 383,220 rows |
| `README.md` | Markdown | This file |
### Data Fields
#### Argument-level
| Field | Type | Description |
|------------------|--------|-------------|
| `argumentId` | string | Unique argument identifier |
| `parentId` | int64 | Parent argument numeric id; `-1` for top-level |
| `userPoints` | int64 | Lifetime platform reputation of the (anonymized) author |
| `argumentBody` | string | Full argument text, UTF-8, original whitespace preserved |
| `date` | int64 | Posting time as Unix milliseconds (UTC) |
| `argumentSide` | string | The side title the argument supports |
| `argumentPoints` | int64 | Net community vote score for this argument |
| `argumentTag` | string | Optional platform tag (`""` if none) |
| `characterCount` | int64 | Character count of `argumentBody` |
| `depth` | int64 | Tree depth; `0` = top-level, `1` = first reply, … |
| `lang` | string | Language of `argumentBody` |
<!-- | `context` | string | Text of the parent argument (`""` for top-level) | -->
#### Debate-level
| Field | Type | Description |
|---------------------|--------|-------------|
| `debateUrl` | string | Original URL on createdebate.com (no longer resolvable) |
| `debateTopic` | string | Platform-assigned category |
| `debateTitle` | string | Debate title |
| `debateDescription` | string | Debate prompt / description |
| `debateStats` | string | JSON: `{score, arguments, totalVotes}` |
| `debateTags` | string | JSON: side → argument count |
| `debateSides` | string | JSON: list of `{id, title, points}` |
<!-- | `topic` | string | Free-text topic label | -->
<!-- | `sides` | string | JSON: list of expanded side descriptions | -->
### Data Splits
No canonical splits are provided. This is a raw distribution; researchers
should construct splits appropriate to their task (random, debate-grouped,
temporal, or topic-stratified).
## Dataset Creation
### Source data
Data was scraped from the (now defunct) CreateDebate platform via a
Selenium-based crawler. The collection covered all `for/against` format
debates discoverable from the platform's listings during the collection
window; debates were prioritized by argument count. For each debate the
full argument tree was extracted along with debate-level metadata.
### What was filtered
Unlike the curated subset, **no content-based filtering was applied** to
this release. Debates spanning sensitive, offensive, or graphic topics
remain in the data. Only the following modifications were made:
- All user-identifying columns (`username`, `profileURL`) were removed.
- `parentId` values were normalized from the string form `"argNNNNN"` to
the numeric id `NNNNN` (top-level: `-1`).
- Nested metadata fields were serialized to JSON strings for portability.
- Structural fields (`depth`, `context`) were computed from the tree.
### Annotations
All labels (`argumentSide`, `argumentPoints`, `debateTopic`, …) are
user- or platform-generated. No additional human annotation was performed.
### Personal and Sensitive Information
All user-identifying fields were removed prior to release. The platform
itself has been taken down, so usernames cannot be re-linked from public
sources. Argument bodies may, however, mention third parties, public
figures, or self-disclose information — they are released as-written.
If you encounter content in this dataset that should be redacted (e.g.
personally identifying information that slipped through, content depicting
illegal acts against identifiable people), please contact the dataset
maintainers to request a redaction in the next version.
## Considerations for Using the Data
### Intended uses
This dataset is intended for academic research in computational
argumentation, NLP, and adjacent fields. Appropriate uses include:
linguistic analysis of argumentation, development and evaluation of
argument mining systems, stance detection, study of online discourse
dynamics, and content moderation research.
### Uses we ask you NOT to make
- Do not use this dataset to train systems intended to generate, promote,
or amplify the kinds of harmful content it documents.
- Do not redistribute the dataset or substantial portions of it. Point
others to this repository instead.
- Do not attempt to re-identify authors.
### Biases and limitations
- **Self-selection bias.** CreateDebate users are not representative of
any broader population.
- **Topical skew.** Some topics are heavily over-represented; political
and ideological debates dominate.
- **Quality variance.** Argument quality ranges from carefully reasoned to
trolling, off-topic, or incoherent. Community vote scores partially but
imperfectly track quality.
- **Binary stance simplification.** The `for/against` format flattens
nuanced positions.
- **Harmful content.** As stated above, the dataset contains content many
readers will find offensive or disturbing.
- **Temporal drift.** Arguments reference contemporary events of their
posting period.
### Licensing
The compilation, schema, and derived metadata are released under
**Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)**. The
underlying argument text was authored by individual platform users; the
platform's terms permitted the collection performed, and the platform is
now defunct. Users of this dataset accept the gated-access terms above.
<!-- ## Citation
```bibtex
@dataset{createdebate_full_2026,
title = {CreateDebate Arguments --- Full Raw Dump},
author = {YOUR NAME(S)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.XXXXXXX},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.XXXXXXX}
}
@inproceedings{YOUR_PAPER_KEY,
title = {YOUR PAPER TITLE},
author = {YOUR NAME(S)},
booktitle = {Proceedings of ...},
year = {2026}
}
``` -->
## Maintenance
This dataset is a static archive of a defunct platform; the data itself
will not grow. Bugfix versions (schema corrections, additional redactions)
will be released as new versions of this dataset.