license: mit
language:
- en
tags:
- text
- conversations
- classification
pretty_name: Slop classifier dataset
Slop classifier dataset
A human-annotated dataset for studying and classifying AI-generated text that people perceive as “AI slop.”
The dataset is built from samples collected from existing public datasets and annotated through the Bench Labs SlopFinder interface.
Slop score
Each sample receives a score based on human votes:
-1 = definitely slop
0 = undecided / neutral
+1 = not slop at all
The score represents human judgment, not an objective measure of quality, AI-generatedness, or factual correctness.
Multiple people may vote on the same sample. This allows agreement and disagreement between annotators to be preserved rather than forcing every sample into a single binary label.
Data
Each annotation contains information such as:
content— the text being evaluatedslop_score— the submitted human ratingsource_dataset— the dataset the sample originated fromsource_row_id— the original sample identifiercontent_hash— identifier used to help detect duplicate contentcreated_at— time the annotation was collected
Source samples may contain conversations rather than standalone text.
Collection
Samples are selected from public datasets and presented randomly to contributors through SlopFinder.
Contributors are given a single continuous slider rather than a list of predefined categories. This is intended to make annotation quick and reduce the friction of contributing.
No account is required to submit a vote.
The dataset is continuously growing as more annotations are collected.
Intended use
This dataset is intended for:
- training AI-slop classification models
- studying human perception of AI-generated writing
- evaluating whether text classifiers generalize across different sources
- research into stylistic characteristics associated with perceived AI slop
It should not be treated as a definitive benchmark for writing quality or AI-generatedness.
Limitations
The labels represent subjective human judgments. Different contributors may have very different ideas of what constitutes “slop.”
The dataset may also contain biases introduced by:
- the source datasets used for sampling
- the population of contributors
- differences in individual definitions of “slop”
- repeated exposure to similar types of text
A score should therefore be interpreted as perceived sloppiness, rather than an objective property of the text.
Contribute
This project is an early preview, and contributions are welcome.
Try SlopFinder and help expand the dataset:
License
MIT