cik
stringclasses
1 value
date
stringlengths
8
8
form
stringclasses
4 values
sentenceCount
int64
0
2.33k
sentence
stringlengths
2
5.25k
filename
stringlengths
40
40
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,836
2.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,837
Mix of Equity, Cash Incentives and Salary Apple relies heavily on long-term equity awards because the Compensation Committee believes they are the most effective compensation element for attracting entrepreneurial, creative executives and promoting their long-term commitment to Apple.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,838
An RSU award generally vests only if the named executive officer continues employment until the specified vesting date, typically two to four years after the date of grant.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,839
Equity awards also help to ensure a strong connection between executive compensation and Apple's financial performance because the value of RSUs depends on Apple's future share price.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,840
Although the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation practices of its peer companies as described in Section D6 below, the Committee does not adhere to strict formulas or survey data to determine the mix of compensation elements.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,841
Instead, as described in Section D, the Committee considers various factors in exercising its discretion to determine compensation, including the experience, responsibilities and performance of each named executive officer as well as Apple's overall financial performance.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,842
This flexibility is particularly important in designing compensation arrangements to attract new executives in highly-competitive, rapidly changing markets.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,843
3.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,844
Elements of Compensation Not Included In The Compensation Program The current compensation program for the named executive officers, including the CEO, does not include the following: •Employment contracts •Cash bonuses other than the performance-based cash incentives under the Performance Bonus Plan and payments under...
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,845
CEO Compensation Apple's CEO, Steve Jobs, currently holds approximately 5.5 million shares of Apple common stock.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,846
Since rejoining Apple in 1997, Mr. Jobs has never sold a share of Apple stock.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,847
His last equity grant was awarded in 2003, and vested in full in 2006.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,848
Mr. Jobs currently holds no unvested equity awards.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,849
In fiscal 2007, Mr. Jobs's entire compensation consisted of his $1 annual salary.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,850
Because Mr. Jobs's continued leadership is critical to Apple, the Compensation Committee is considering additional compensation arrangements for him.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,851
Mr. Jobs has received a $1 annual salary since he rejoined Apple in 1997 and began serving as interim CEO.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,852
In 1999, Apple awarded Mr. Jobs an aircraft as an executive bonus in recognition of his outstanding performance during the previous two years.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,853
Mr. Jobs also received two stock option grants, one in 2000 and another in 2001.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,854
Mr. Jobs never exercised these grants, and they were both cancelled in March 2003, when Apple awarded Mr. Jobs a grant of 5 million shares of restricted stock.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,855
The 2003 restricted stock grant required Mr. Jobs to remain employed by Apple for three more years before it vested.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,856
This grant, which increased to 10 million shares when Apple's common stock split in 2005, vested in full in March 2006.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,857
After a portion of these shares was withheld for the payment of taxes, Mr. Jobs received the remaining 5,426,447 shares.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,858
Due in large part to Mr. Jobs's leadership, Apple's stock price (after accounting for a stock split) increased from $7.47 on the March 2003 grant date to $64.66 on the March 2006 vesting date-more than an eight-fold increase in three years.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,859
Under Mr. Jobs's continued leadership, Apple's stock price increased from $64.66 per share in March 2006 to $189.95 per share as of October 31, 2007-a three-fold increase in approximately 18 months.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,860
When he was elected to Apple's Board of Directors in 1997, Mr. Jobs received the standard director's stock option grant for 30,000 shares.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,861
Because Mr. Jobs became employed later that year as Apple's interim CEO, he was no longer eligible for such director grants.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,862
When the 1997 director grant (which increased to 120,000 shares after two stock splits) was due to expire in August 2007, Mr. Jobs exercised the option and he currently holds these 120,000 shares.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,863
D. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,864
Team-Based Compensation The compensation program for the named executive officers rests on two assumptions.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,865
First, each officer must demonstrate exceptional personal performance in order to remain part of the executive team.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,866
Second, each officer must contribute as a member of the team to Apple's overall success rather than merely achieve specific objectives within that officer's area of responsibility.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,867
2.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,868
Independent Compensation Committee Determines All Executive Compensation The Compensation Committee determines all compensation for the named executive officers.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,869
All three Committee members are independent of Apple's management.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,870
During the first quarter of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee conducts an evaluation of each named executive officer to determine if any changes in the officer's compensation are appropriate based on the considerations described below.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,871
The CEO does not participate in the Committee's deliberations or decision with regard to his compensation.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,872
At the Committee's request, the CEO reviews with the Committee the performance of the other four named executive officers, but no other named executive officer has any input into executive compensation decisions.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,873
The Committee gives considerable weight to the CEO's evaluation of the other named executive officers because of his direct knowledge of each officer's performance and contributions.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,874
For each officer, the Committee members independently determine each component of compensation based on their collective assessment of the officer's performance as well as Apple's overall financial performance.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,875
3.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,876
The Crucial Role of Long-Term Equity Awards Overview.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,877
The Committee believes that long-term equity awards are the most effective way to attract and retain a superlative executive team.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,878
Accordingly, executive compensation is heavily weighted toward long-term equity awards rather than cash compensation, and the awards have long vesting intervals to maximize their retention value.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,879
This approach is reflected in the following: •The CEO's compensation has been generally tied to long-term equity; for example, his last equity award did not vest for three years.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,880
•For the other four named executive officers, equity awards represented approximately 85% of their target total compensation in fiscal 2007.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,881
This compares to approximately 70% at Apple's peer companies.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,882
•Fiscal 2004 equity awards vested 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date; the remaining 50% will vest on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,883
•Fiscal 2006 equity awards do not vest at all until 2010, when they vest in full.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,884
In designing long-term equity awards, the Committee seeks to maximize their effectiveness in accomplishing Apple's compensation objectives while recognizing the Board's duty to Apple's shareholders to limit equity dilution.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,885
The Committee believes this balance has been achieved as follows: Restricted Stock Units Minimize Dilution and Support Long-Term Focus.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,886
Since fiscal 2004, all equity awards to the named executive officers have been RSUs rather than stock options.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,887
A grant of RSUs gives an officer the right to receive a specified number of shares of Apple common stock, at no cost to the officer, if the officer remains employed at Apple until the RSUs vest.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,888
RSUs granted in 2004 also provide for accelerated vesting if the named executive officer is terminated without cause or on a change of control, RSUs granted before 2007 provide for accelerated vesting on a change of control, and all RSUs provide for accelerated vesting upon the death of the officer.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,889
The compensation value of an RSU does not depend solely on future stock price increases; at grant, its value is equal to Apple's stock price.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,890
Although its value may increase or decrease with changes in the stock price during the period before vesting, an RSU will have value in the long term, encouraging retention.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,891
By contrast, the entire compensation value of a stock option depends on future stock price appreciation.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,892
Accordingly, RSUs can deliver significantly greater share-for-share compensation value at grant than stock options, and Apple can offer comparable grant date compensation value with fewer shares and less dilution for its shareholders.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,893
Long Vesting Intervals to Maximize Retention.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,894
All vesting of RSUs is generally subject to continued employment.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,895
Except for occasional new hire grants, vesting occurs at intervals of no less than two years after the grant date.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,896
This ensures that a meaningful portion of a named executive officer's awards will vest every two years-a strong incentive to continue employment with Apple.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,897
The following table shows the grant and vesting patterns for ongoing RSU grants for the named executive officers since fiscal 2004 (excluding those who were not named executive officers at the time of grant).
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,898
Vesting Conditions.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,899
As noted above, the vesting of all RSUs is generally contingent on the named executive officer's continued employment with Apple, rather than on performance with regard to specific business objectives.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,900
From time to time, the Compensation Committee has considered various forms of performance-based vesting.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,901
After careful evaluation, the Committee has concluded that performance-based vesting would not serve Apple's current objectives as effectively as the program described above.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,902
The Committee generally grants RSUs with two to four year vesting periods to maximize the award's retention value.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,903
This retention value would be undermined if a named executive officer's equity awards (which represent approximately 85% of the officer's compensation) were at risk based on performance measures that were determined two or even four years prior to the vesting date.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,904
Given the intensely dynamic business environment in which Apple operates, it would be extremely difficult to craft meaningful objectives with such a long horizon.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,905
Apple imposes no requirement that the named executive officers hold their common stock for any period after vesting.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,906
Annual Burn Rate Averages Less Than 2.5%.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,907
In fiscal 2005, Apple committed to an annual "burn rate" (the total number of all equity award shares granted during the fiscal year divided by the total shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year) of 2.5% from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2007.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,908
This commitment represented a significant reduction from an average burn rate of 4.8% from fiscal 2002 through fiscal 2004.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,909
In fact, Apple's average annual burn rate from fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2007 was approximately 1.6%.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,910
Overhang from Equity Plans at 12.9%.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,911
Overhang (granted and outstanding equity awards plus shares reserved for future awards, divided by the sum of total shares outstanding, granted and outstanding equity awards, and shares reserved for future awards) is another measure of equity dilution.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,912
The efficient use of equity awards, combined with the substantial exercise of employee stock options due to the significant increase in Apple's stock price over the past few years, has caused Apple's overhang to decline from approximately 14.5% at the end of fiscal 2005 to approximately 12.9% at the end of fiscal 2007.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,913
Frequency and Size of Equity Awards.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,914
The named executive officers typically receive equity awards every two years, rather than every year.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,915
This practice is consistent with the long time horizon and lengthy vesting periods of the awards.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,916
By making awards less frequently, the Committee can provide larger grants, which in turn promotes greater retention.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,917
To determine the size of RSU grants, the Compensation Committee first establishes a target compensation value that it wants to deliver to the named executive officers through long-term equity awards.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,918
In doing so, the Committee considers various factors, including the following: •The practice of granting equity only every two years •The heavy weight placed on equity in the mix of total compensation •The officer's experience and performance •The scope, responsibility and business impact of the officer's position •The...
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,919
4.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,920
The Minor Role of Cash Compensation Base Salaries.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,921
The Committee believes that base salaries are significantly less important than performance-based bonuses and long-term equity awards in meeting Apple's compensation objectives.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,922
The minor role of salaries as part of total compensation is reflected in the following: •The CEO has received an annual base salary of $1 since rejoining Apple in 1997.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,923
•The fiscal 2007 average base salary for the other named executive officers was below median among the peer companies shown in Section D6, despite Apple's significantly greater financial and business success.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,924
•Base salaries for the named executive officers have not increased since October 2005, except for a promotion-related increase for one officer.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,925
Performance-Based Cash Incentives.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,926
The Performance Bonus Plan, which has been approved by Apple's shareholders, authorizes the Committee to issue plan-based cash incentive awards to compensate officers for achieving specific financial objectives that are established annually.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,927
The Committee believes that performance-based cash compensation is an important component of executive compensation; however, it represents a small percentage of total compensation because its effectiveness in meeting Apple's compensation objectives is limited.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,928
It is a less significant factor in attracting new executive talent than equity compensation, and it promotes retention only in the short-term-over the performance period.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,929
Accordingly, the plan is modestly funded, as reflected by the following: •The CEO does not participate in the Performance Bonus Plan.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,930
•Apple's target payout of 50% of base salary is significantly lower than peer companies as a group, where median target bonus payouts range from 100% to 160% of base salary.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,931
•The maximum payout of 100% for exceptional performance is also lower than peer companies, where 3 times the target range (i.e., 300% to 480% of base salary) is becoming increasingly common.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,932
The Compensation Committee establishes performance goals each year based on revenue and operating income objectives in Apple's internal business plan.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,933
The Committee has selected these performance goals because they are important indicators of increased shareholder value.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,934
These performance goals generally exclude the effects of extraordinary, unusual or infrequently occurring events or changes in accounting principles.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt
0000320193
20071115
10-K
1,935
Apple does not publicly disclose specific annual internal revenue or operating income objectives, as its business plan is highly confidential.
0001047469-07-009340/full-submission.txt