cik stringclasses 1
value | date stringlengths 8 8 | form stringclasses 4
values | sentenceCount int64 0 2.33k | sentence stringlengths 2 5.25k | filename stringlengths 40 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,023 | Given the stay, the Company’s response to the amended complaint is not yet due. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,024 | MacTech Systems v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Macadam v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Computer International, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc.; Elite Computers and Software, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc.; The Neighborhood Computer Store v. Apple Computer, Inc. MacAccessory Center, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc.; MacAccessory Center, Inc.... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,025 | Plaintiffs request unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,026 | The Company answered the Computer International complaint on November 12, 2003, denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,027 | The Company filed an answer in the Macadam case on December 3, 2004 denying all allegations and asserting numerous defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,028 | Three of the other plaintiffs filed amended complaints on February 7, 2005, and on March 16, 2005 the Company filed answers to these claims denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,029 | A sixth Plaintiff, MacAccessory Center, filed a complaint on February 23, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,030 | The Company filed an answer to this complaint on April 20, 2005 denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,031 | All of these cases with the exception of Macadam are in discovery and are coordinated (along with the Branning class action) in Santa Clara Superior Court. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,032 | The cases (except Branning) are set for trial on November 27, 2006. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,033 | On December 19, 2005, Tom Santos, Macadam’s principal and an original plaintiff in the Macadam case, filed a Fifth Amended Complaint on his own behalf (not on behalf of Macadam) alleging fraud, violations of California Business & Professional Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professional Code §17... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,034 | The Company filed a demurrer to Santos’ amended complaint and a special motion to strike the defamation cause of action on January 20, 2006. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,035 | A hearing is scheduled for February 17, 2006. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,036 | The Company also filed a cross complaint against Santos on January 20, 2006 alleging violations of California Business & Professional Code §17200, fraud and deceit, breach of contract, and violation of California Penal Code §502. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,037 | On October 1, 2003, one of the reseller Plaintiffs, Macadam, was deauthorized as an Apple reseller. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,038 | Macadam filed a motion for a temporary order to reinstate it as a reseller, which the Court denied. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,039 | The Court denied Macadam’s motion for a preliminary injunction on December 19, 2003. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,040 | On December 6, 2004 Macadam filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the Northern District of California, which placed a stay on the litigation as to Macadam only. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,041 | The Company filed a claim in the bankruptcy proceedings on February 16, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,042 | The Macadam bankruptcy case was converted to Chapter 7 (liquidation) on April 29, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,043 | The Company has reached a tentative settlement of the Macadam case with the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,044 | The parties await approval of that settlement by the Bankruptcy Court. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,045 | Macsolutions Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,046 | Plaintiff Macsolutions, Inc., an Apple authorized reseller, filed this lawsuit against the Company on January 20, 2006 alleging breach of contract, fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with economic advantage, violation of the Cartwright Act, violation of California Business & Professions ... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,047 | The factual allegations in this complaint are similar to those in the six other reseller cases and the Branning class action. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,048 | Principally, Plaintiffs allege that the Company has treated Macsolutions unfairly compared to other resellers, that the Company has competed unfairly in opening the Apple Retail stores, and has allegedly sold used goods as new. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,049 | The Company's response is not yet due. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,050 | Premier International Associates LLC v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,051 | Plaintiff Premier International Associates LLC filed this action on November 3, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging infringement by the Company of U.S. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,052 | Patents 6,243,725 and 6,763,345 both entitled “List Building System.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,053 | The Company filed an answer on January 13, 2006 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,054 | The Company also asserted counter claims for a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,055 | Slattery v. Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,056 | Plaintiff filed this purported class action on January 3, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging various claims including alleged unlawful tying of music purchased on the iTunes Music Store with the purchase of iPods and vice versa and unlawful acquisition or maintenan... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,057 | Plaintiff’s complaint alleged violations of §§1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,058 | §§1 and 2), California Business and Professions Code §16700 et seq. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,059 | (the Cartwright Act), California Business and Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), common law unjust enrichment and common law monopolization. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,060 | Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,061 | The Company filed a motion to dismiss on February 10, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,062 | On September 9, 2005, the Court denied the motion in part and granted it in part. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,063 | Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 23, 2005 and the Company filed an answer on October 11, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,064 | The case is in discovery. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,065 | St-Germain v. Apple Canada, Inc. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,066 | Plaintiff filed this case in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on August 5, 2005, seeking authorization to institute a class action for the refund by the Company of the Canadian Private Copying Levy that was applied to the iPod purchase price in Quebec between December 12, 2003 and December 14, 2004 but later declared invalid ... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,067 | A class certification hearing took place January 13, 2006 and the Company awaits a ruling. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,068 | The Company is in the process of completing a refund program for this levy. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,069 | Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation and Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,070 | Plaintiffs filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled “Method and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on Us... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,071 | The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,072 | On August 22, 2005, the Company filed an amended answer to add charges of inequitable conduct. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,073 | The case is in discovery. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,074 | Markman briefing is completed. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,075 | A technology tutorial and Markman hearing are scheduled for March 2006. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,076 | Tse v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,077 | Plaintiff Ho Keung Tse filed this action against the Company and other defendants on August 5, 2005 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland alleging infringement by the Company of U.S. Patent 6,665,797 entitled “Protection of Software Again [sic] Against Unauthorized Use.” The complaint seeks u... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,078 | The Company filed an answer on October 31, 2005 denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,079 | On October 28, 2005, the Company and the other defendants filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,080 | Wimmer v. Apple Computer, Inc. (originally filed as Tomczak v. Apple Computer, Inc. on October 19, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division; amended complaint filed October 26, 2005); Moschella, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed October 26, 2005 United Sta... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,081 | v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed October 26, 2005, Los Angeles County Superior Court); Kahan, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed October 31, 2005, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York); Jennings, et al., v. Apple Computer, Inc. (filed November 4, 2005, United States District Court for th... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,082 | The Wimmer and Moschella actions were brought on behalf of purported nationwide classes of iPod nano purchasers, with the exception of California purchasers, and allege violations of the consumer protection, express and implied warranty statutes of each state covered by the putative class definition, as well as neglige... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,083 | The Calado action was brought on behalf of a purported California class of iPod nano purchasers and asserts claims for alleged violation of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), breac... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,084 | The Jennings action was brought on behalf of a purported class of all iPod nano purchasers outside of the United States, based upon alleged violations of the same California statutes as in the Calado complaint. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,085 | The Kahan action was brought on behalf of a purported New York class of iPod nano purchasers and alleges claims under the New York unfair competition law, breach of express warranty and unjust enrichment. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,086 | The Rappel complaint is filed on behalf of a purported New Jersey class of purchasers and alleges claims under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Acts and for breach of warranty and unjust enrichment. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,087 | The Mayo and Williamson complaints were both brought on behalf of a Louisiana class of purchasers, and allege breach of warranties, unjust enrichment and violations of the Louisiana Products Liability Act. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,088 | The Valencia complaint was brought on behalf of a worldwide class of purchasers and alleges breach of warranties, fraudulent concealment, violations of California’s Business & Professions Code §17200 and §17500 and the CLRA, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,089 | The complaints seek damages and various other remedies. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,090 | The Company’s responses to these complaints are not yet due. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,091 | The Company filed a motion for transfer and consolidation before Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation (MDL) to have all of the federal cases transferred to the Northern District of California and consolidated for pre-trial purposes. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,092 | The motion is unopposed and the Company awaits a ruling. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,093 | Five of the actions are stayed pending a ruling on the Company’s MDL motion. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,094 | The Company is seeking stays in the remaining actions. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,095 | Two similar complaints, Carpentier v. Apple Canada, Inc., and Royer-Brennan v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc. were filed in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on October 27, 2005 and November 9, 2005, respectively,
seeking authorization to institute class actions on behalf of iPod nano purchasers in Quebec. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,096 | A similar complaint, Mund v. Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc., was filed in Ontario, Canada on January 9, 2006 seeking authorization to institute a class action on behalf of iPod nano purchasers in Canada. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,097 | Union Federale des Consummateurs - Que Choisir v. Apple Computer France S.A.R.L. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,098 | and iTunes S.A.R.L. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,099 | Plaintiff, a consumer association in France, filed this complaint on February 9, 2005 alleging that the above-listed entities are violating consumer law by (1) omitting to mention that the iPod is allegedly not compatible with music from online music services other than the iTunes Music Store and that the music from th... | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,100 | Plaintiff seeks damages, injunctive relief and other relief. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,101 | The first hearing on the case took place on May 24, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,102 | The Company’s response to the complaint was served on November 8, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,103 | Item 6. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,104 | Exhibits
(a) Index to Exhibits
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
Form
Filing Date/
Period End Date
Filed
Herewith
3.1
Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of California on January 27, 1988. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,105 | S-3
7/27/88
3.2
Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of California on May 4, 2000. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,106 | 10-Q
5/11/00
3.3
By-Laws of the Company, as amended through June 7, 2004. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,107 | 10-Q
6/26/04
3.4
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of California on February 25, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,108 | 10-Q
3/26/05
4.2
Indenture dated as of February 1, 1994, between the Company and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,109 | 10-Q
4/01/94
4.3
Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1994, among the Company, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as resigning trustee, and Citibank, N.A., as successor trustee. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,110 | 10-Q
4/01/94
4.5
Form of the Company’s 6 1/2% Notes due 2004. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,111 | 10-Q
4/01/94
4.8
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 7, 1996 among the Company and Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Morgan Stanley & Co. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,112 | Incorporated. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,113 | S-3
8/28/96
4.9
Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock of Apple Computer, Inc.
10-K
9/26/97
10.A.3
Apple Computer, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective as of October 1, 1990. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,114 | 10-K
9/27/91
10.A.3-1
Amendment of Apple Computer, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan dated March 1, 1992. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,115 | 10-K
9/25/92
10.A.3-2
Amendment No. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,116 | 2 to the Apple Computer, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,117 | 10-Q
3/28/97
10.A.5
1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended through November 5, 1997. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,118 | 10-Q
12/26/97
10.A.6
Apple Computer, Inc. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,119 | Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended through April 21, 2005. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,120 | 10-Q
3/26/05
10.A.8
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each officer of the Registrant. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,121 | 10-K
9/26/97
10.A.43
NeXT Computer, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
0000320193 | 20060203 | 10-Q | 1,122 | S-8
3/21/97
10.A.49
Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended through October 19, 2001. | 0001104659-06-005910/full-submission.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.