Datasets:
image imagewidth (px) 512 512 | mask imagewidth (px) 512 512 | file_name stringlengths 9 9 |
|---|---|---|
00001.png | ||
00002.png | ||
00003.png | ||
00004.png | ||
00005.png | ||
00006.png | ||
00007.png | ||
00008.png | ||
00009.png | ||
00010.png | ||
00011.png | ||
00012.png | ||
00013.png | ||
00014.png | ||
00015.png | ||
00016.png | ||
00017.png | ||
00018.png | ||
00019.png | ||
00020.png | ||
00021.png | ||
00022.png | ||
00023.png | ||
00024.png | ||
00025.png | ||
00026.png | ||
00027.png | ||
00028.png | ||
00029.png | ||
00030.png | ||
00031.png | ||
00032.png | ||
00033.png | ||
00034.png | ||
00035.png | ||
00036.png | ||
00037.png | ||
00038.png | ||
00039.png | ||
00040.png | ||
00041.png | ||
00042.png | ||
00043.png | ||
00044.png | ||
00045.png | ||
00046.png | ||
00047.png | ||
00048.png | ||
00049.png | ||
00050.png | ||
00051.png | ||
00052.png | ||
00053.png | ||
00054.png | ||
00055.png | ||
00056.png | ||
00057.png | ||
00058.png | ||
00059.png | ||
00060.png | ||
00061.png | ||
00062.png | ||
00063.png | ||
00064.png | ||
00065.png | ||
00066.png | ||
00067.png | ||
00068.png | ||
00069.png | ||
00070.png | ||
00071.png | ||
00072.png | ||
00073.png | ||
00074.png | ||
00075.png | ||
00076.png | ||
00077.png | ||
00078.png | ||
00079.png | ||
00080.png | ||
00081.png | ||
00082.png | ||
00083.png | ||
00084.png | ||
00085.png | ||
00086.png | ||
00087.png | ||
00088.png | ||
00089.png | ||
00090.png | ||
00091.png | ||
00092.png | ||
00093.png | ||
00094.png | ||
00095.png | ||
00096.png | ||
00097.png | ||
00098.png | ||
00099.png | ||
00100.png |
Château de Chambord — Mortar Joint Segmentation
425 image patches (512×512) cut from high-resolution photographs of the Château de Chambord, France, each paired with a binary mask marking the mortar joints between stones.
Built-heritage conservation needs to measure how mortar joints erode over time. That means segmenting them first.
| Split | Patches |
|---|---|
| train | 333 |
| test | 92 |
Fields
image— 512×512 RGB patchmask— 512×512 binary mask (modeL, values{0, 255}); white = mortar jointfile_name
The dataset covers flat-relief, vertical-relief and horizontal-relief façade configurations.
How the masks were made
Stone masks were generated with a custom QGIS plugin built on SAM (Segment Anything Model), manually curated by heritage experts, then inverted to obtain the mortar-joint labels. So the annotations are model-assisted and human-corrected, not drawn from scratch.
Caveats
- This is built heritage (a building), not a collection object — a different kind of cultural-heritage data than manuscripts or artworks.
- Masks are derived by inversion from stone masks, so mortar-joint boundaries inherit whatever imprecision the stone segmentation had.
- All patches come from a single monument. Expect limited generalisation to other masonry, stone types, or lighting.
Load
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("biglam/chambord-mortar-joint-segmentation", split="train")
row = ds[0]
row["image"].size, row["mask"].size # 512x512 patch and its binary joint mask
Source & credit
Sylvie Treuillet, Xavier Brunetaud, Xavier Desquesnes et al. Château de Chambord mortar joint segmentation dataset. Zenodo, 2026-03-14. https://zenodo.org/records/19025457 — CC-BY-4.0.
This repository converts the deposit to Parquet. Please cite the original authors.
@dataset{treuillet_2026_chambord_mortar,
author = {Treuillet, Sylvie and Brunetaud, Xavier and Desquesnes, Xavier and Lucho, Stuardo},
title = {{Ch{\^a}teau de Chambord mortar joint segmentation dataset}},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Zenodo},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.19025457}
}
- Downloads last month
- 2