text stringlengths 16 313 |
|---|
These identifiers can beused as arguments to subsequent messages. |
In other cases, it may be the name of an event that israised on the receiving object. |
In normal practice withprocedural overloading, both the message name and theargument list types are required to identify an operation. |
The parentheses can be used even if the list isempty. |
The following are samples of control message label syntax. |
Instead of text expressions for arguments and return values, data tokens may beshown near a message (Figure 13-123). |
A token is a small circle labeled with theargument expression or return value name. |
It has a small arrow on it that pointsalong the message (for an argument) or opposite the message (for a return value). |
Tokens represent arguments and return values. |
The choice of text syntax or tokensis a presentation option, but text is more compact and is recommended for mostpurposes. |
The syntax of messages may be expressed in the syntax of a programming lan-guage, such as C++ or Smalltalk. |
All the expressions on a single diagram shoulduse the same syntax, however. |
A class whose instances are classes. |
Metaclasses are typically used to constructmetamodels. |
A model that defines the language for expressing a metamodel. |
The relationshipbetween a meta-metamodel and a metamodel is analogous to the relationship be-tween a metamodel and a model. |
This level of indirection is usually relevant onlyto tool builders, database builders, and the like. |
UML is defined in terms of a meta-metamodel, called the Meta-Object Facility (MOF). |
A model that defines the language for expressing a model; an instance of a meta-metamodel. |
The UML metamodel defines the structure of UML models. |
A generic term for all entities in a metamodeling language. |
A term grouping relationships that connect descriptors to their instances. |
Theseinclude the instance relationship and the powertype relationship. |
A method is an implementation of an operation. |
The language must be matched to the purpose,of course. |
A human language, for instance, may be adequate for early analysis butnot suitable for code generation. |
An operation declaration implies the presence of a method unless the operationis declared as abstract. |
In a generalization hierarchy, each repeated declaration ofthe operation implies a new method that overrides any inherited method of thesame operation. |
Two declarations represent the same operation if their signaturesmatch. |
Note that a method is an executable procedure—an algorithm—not simply aspecification of results. |
A before-and-after specification is not a method, for exam-ple. |
A method is a commitment to implementation and addresses issues of algo-rithm, computational complexity, and encapsulation. |
In some respects, a method may have stricter properties than its operation. |
But ifthe operation is a query, then the method must be a query. |
Similarly, a methodmay strengthen the concurrency property. |
A sequential operation may be imple-mented as a guarded or concurrent method. |
In these cases, the method is consis-tent with the declarations of its operation. |
If the operation is inherited, the method can beshown by repeating the operation declaration in normal (nonitalic) text to show aconcrete operation. |
Method on nonabstract operationShapedraw ( ) |
A semantically complete abstraction of a system. |
A model is a more or less complete abstraction of a system from a particular view-point. |
It is complete in the sense that it fully describes the system or entity, at thechosen level of precision and viewpoint. |
Different models provide mostly inde-pendent viewpoints that can be manipulated separately. |
A model may comprise a containment hierarchy of packages in which the top-level package corresponds to the entire system. |
The contents of a model are thetransitive closure of its containment (ownership) relationships from top-levelpackages to model elements. |
A model may also include relevant parts of the system’s environment, repre-sented, for example, by actors and their interfaces. |
In particular, the relationshipof the environment to the system elements may be modeled. |
A system and its envi-ronment form a larger system at a higher level of scope. |
Therefore, it is possible torelate elements at various levels of detail in a smooth way. |
Elements in different models do not directly affect each other, but they oftenrepresent the same concepts at different levels of detail or stages of development. |
Therefore, relationships among them, such as trace and refinement, are importantto the development process itself and often capture important design decisions. |
A model can be shown as a package with the stereotype «model». |
There is little no-tational detail to show about models, however. |
Tools can show lists of models, butmodels have few relationships among themselves. |
Most useful is the ability totraverse from a model name to its top package or to a map of its overall contents. |
No one view of a system, or indeed no system itself, is ever complete in and of it-self. |
There are always connections to the wider world, and a model always fallsshort of reality. |
Therefore, the concept of a closed model is always an approxima-tion in which arbitrary lines must be drawn for practical work. |
A UML model is represented as a package hierarchy that emphasizes one view ofa system. |
An element that is an abstraction drawn from the system being modeled. |
Contrastwith presentation element, which is a (generally visual) presentation of one ormore modeling elements for human interaction. |
All elements that have semantics are model elements, including real-world con-cepts and computer-system implementation concepts. |
Graphic elements whosepurpose is to visualize a model are presentation elements. |
They are not model ele-ments, as they do not add semantics to the model. |
Model elements may have names, but the use and constraints on names vary bykind of model element and are discussed with each kind. |
Each model element be-longs to a namespace appropriate to the kind of element. |
All model elements mayhave the following attached properties. |
The tag is aname that identifies the meaning of the value. |
Constraints are restrictions that are expressed as |
The stereotype does not alter the struc-ture of the base class, but it may add constraints andtagged values that apply to the model elements bearingthe stereotype. |
In addition, model elements may participate in dependency relationships. |
See Chapter 14, Standard Elements, for a list of predefined tags, constraints, andstereotypes. |
That aspect of a model dealing with the organization of the model itself into struc-tured parts—namely, packages, subsystems, and models. |
Refers to something that occurs during a modeling activity of the software devel-opment process. |
Usage note: When discussingobject systems, it is often important to distinguish between modeling-time andrun-time concerns. |
See also development process, stages of modeling. |
A software unit of storage and manipulation. |
Modules include source code mod-ules, binary code modules, and executable code modules. |
The word does notcorrespond to a single UML construct, but rather includes several constructs. |
A classifier role that denotes a set of objects rather than a single object. |
See also classifier role, collaboration, message. |
A multiobject is a classifier role that denotes a set of objects, usually the set of ob-jects on the many side of an association. |
A multiobject is used within a collabora-tion to show operations that address the entire set of objects as a unit rather than asingle object in it. |
For example, an operation to find an object within a set operateson the entire set, not on an individual object. |
The underlying static model is unaf-fected by this grouping. |
A multiobject is shown as two rectangles in which the top rectangle is shiftedslightly vertically and horizontally to suggest a stack of rectangles (Figure 13-125). |
A message arrow to the multiobject symbol indicates a message to the set of ob-jects—for example, a selection operation to find an individual object. |
To perform an operation on each object in a set of associated objects requirestwo messages: an iteration to the multiobject to extract links to the individual ob-jects, then a message sent to each object using the (temporary) link. |
This may beelided on a diagram by combining the messages into one that includes an iterationand an application to each object. |
The target rolename takes a many indicator (*)to show that many links are implied. |
An object from the set is shown as a normal object symbol, but it may be at-tached to the multiobject symbol using a composition link to indicate that it ispart of the set. |
A message arrow to the simple object symbol indicates a message toan individual object. |
Typically, a selection message to a multiobject returns a reference to an individ-ual object, to which the original sender then sends a message. |
A semantic variation of generalization in which an object may belong directly tomore than one class. |
This is a semantic variation point under which an object may be a direct instanceof more than one class. |
When used with dynamic classification, objects may ac-quire and lose classes during run time. |
This allows classes to be used to representtemporary roles an object may play. |
Although multiple classification matches logic and everyday discourse well, itcomplicates implementation of a programming language and is not supported bythe popular programming languages. |
A semantic variation point of generalization in which an element may have morethan one parent. |
This is the default assumption within UML and is necessary forproper modeling of many situations, although modelers may choose to restrict itsuse for certain kinds of elements. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.