text stringlengths 0 5.95k |
|---|
AILA_Q1||The appellant on February 9, 1961 was appointed as an Officer in Grade III in the respondent Bank ( for short 'the Bank'). He was promoted on April 1, 1968 to the Grade officer in the Foreign Exchange Department in the Head Office of the Bank. Sometime in 1964, MCH Society ( for short 'the Society') was formed... |
AILA_Q2||The appellant before us was examined as prime witness in the trial of T.R. on the file of the Special Judge against the first respondent. The trial ended in conviction against the first respondent and when the appeal filed by him came to be heard by the High Court the appellant had become a Cabinet Minister. O... |
AILA_Q3||This appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Single Judge of High Court dated 6th June, 1988 whereby the learned Single Judge declined to quash the prosecution of the petitioner. The petitioner therein has been prosecuted for selling adulterated supari on the basis of a certificate issued by the Directo... |
AILA_Q4||The Petitioner was married to the Respondent No.2, on 27th November, 2005, as per Hindu traditions and customs. At the time of marriage 12 lakhs in cash, 45 sovereigns of gold and 50,000/- is alleged to have been given to the Accused Nos.1 to 4, who are the husband, the mother-in-law and other relatives of the... |
AILA_Q5||This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 19.8.2011 passed by the High Court, whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellants thereby confirming the conviction of the appellants with certain modifications. On 18.11.1994, at about 8.00 A.M. in the morning the complainant P1 (P... |
AILA_Q6||On 19.3.1999, SI P1 along Ct. P2 went to Village V1 where Inspector P1, PW-16, had reached along with his staff. After some time, ACP, arrived at the spot. On enquiry, they came to know that one constable of Police Station, namely, P2, having suffered a gun shot injury, had been taken to the hospital. The Head... |
AILA_Q7||This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal but modifying the sentence. The appellant took his trial on the allegations that he had dishonestly and fraudulently misappropriated a sum of Rs. 3851.60, which amount was in his control in the capacity of a public se... |
AILA_Q8||This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23 February 2005 of the High Court (Aurangabad Bench), by which the appeal preferred by the appellants was dismissed and their conviction and sentence of 7 years RI imposed thereunder was affirmed. The deceased P1 was daugh... |
AILA_Q9||The complainant P1 filed a Special Leave Petition in this court seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 6th April, 1993 of the High Court. The incident for which these accused were charged is the murder of P2, son of the complainant P1 (appellant) on 13th June, 1982. As per the case of the prosecut... |
AILA_Q10||The four appellants, along with P1 son of P2, were jointly tried in the court of Additional Sessions Judge on the following charges: "That you all accused nos. 1 to 5 on or about 12th day of November, 1967 at about 5-45 a.m. near XYZ Road, formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of... |
AILA_Q11||The detenu P1, a French national, at the relevant time was employed as Airport Manager by A1 in L1. By an A1 flight, on September 20, 1981, he arrived at International Airport, L2 and passed through green channel indicating he had no dutiable goods to declare to the Customs Authorities. When he was at Exit Ga... |
AILA_Q12||The petitioner has been under detention pursuant to the order dated June 5, 1990 passed by the District Magistrate with a view to preventing him "from doing any such work which is prejudicial for the maintenance of public order". The grounds of detention were furnished to the detenu in time. Therein it was st... |
AILA_Q13||This is an appeal with a certificate granted by the judicial Commissioner. P1-hereinafter referred to as the respondent'-was appointed a constable in the Police Force of L1 by the Superintendent of Police, L2 by order dated April 18, 1954. The employment was temporary and was liable to be terminated with one ... |
AILA_Q14||P1 is before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 17.10.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court. Appellant herein along with P2 (Accused No.1), P3 (Accused No. 3) and P4 (Accused No.4) were tried for committing the murder of one P5. P5 was an accused in a case of ... |
AILA_Q15||The appellants are five in number and they have filed this appeal as of right. They were acquitted by the trial court but convicted by the High Court on appeal filed by the State, besides the offence of rioting. On the first count they were each sentenced to imprisonment for life besides fine and to lesser se... |
AILA_Q16||The appellant P1 is convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge by judgment and order dated 5th/9th August, 1991 and was sentenced to death subject to confirmation by the High Court. Appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence which was partly allowed. The order with regard to the death penalty was ... |
AILA_Q17||facts of the matter, as is evident from the present Writ Petition challenging an order of detention dated 1st March, 2001 it appears that the petitioner is presently confined in Central Prison and it is this detention which the petitioner contended is without the authority of law and constitute an infringemen... |
AILA_Q18||These appeals involve a pure question of law as to whether an award by which residue assets of a partnership firm are distributed amongst the partners on dissolution of the partnership firm requires registration. Briefly the facts are that a partnership firm was constituted comprising of four persons belongin... |
AILA_Q19||This appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the High Court whereby the High Court has allowed the appeal filed by the State and convicted all the appellants and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- ea... |
AILA_Q20||This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment rendered by a High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offences punishable. The High Court by the impugned judgment confirmed the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions Judge convicting the appellant and sentencing him to su... |
AILA_Q21||Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court by which two Writ Petitions filed by the respondent were disposed of. The controversy lies within a very narrow compass. Before dealing with the rival contentions the factual background needs to be noted. Respondent was ap... |
AILA_Q22||Assailing the legal acceptability of the judgment and order passed by the High Court where it has given endorsement to the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge wherein the learned trial Judge had found the appellants guilty of the offences and imposed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment ... |
AILA_Q23||The petitioner is a firm carrying on business as builders, colonizers and contractors. The petitioner is the owner of 24.45 acres of vacant land situated in s village. Being engaged in construction activities it made an application under the provisions for the grant of licence for group housing scheme. This a... |
AILA_Q24||These appeals are directed against the judgment of a High Court whereby an appeal and a criminal revision were disposed of. The appellants were found guilty and sentenced to undergo various terms of sentences. The Criminal Appeal was filed by three appellants questioning the conviction and sentence as recorde... |
AILA_Q25||These appeals involving common questions of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The lands situated inter alia in villages V1, V2, V3 and V4 were acquired by the State for the purpose of use thereof by the Appellant. A notification was issued on 3... |
AILA_Q26||The hearing before us now relates to certain objections filed to the Award made by a former Judge of this Court who was appointed the sole arbitrator to adjudicate upon the dispute between the parties pursuant to the Order of this Court dated 18th November, 1987 in the circumstances as set out hereinafter. In... |
AILA_Q27||Appellant before us was detained. He is the Managing Director of a company, registered and incorporated as CompanyC1. It was an exporter and held a valid licence therefor. The company was to export products of alloy steel. Upon exporting of alloy steel, it was entitled to credits under the Duty Entitlement Pa... |
AILA_Q28||Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants. The appeal was directed against the judgment dated 31.8.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting the appellants for offence and sentencing each to undergo imprisonment for life and t... |
AILA_Q29||This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 5.8.2008, passed by the High Court reversing the judgment of acquittal dated 8.4.2003 recorded by the Sessions Court wherein the appellant was charge sheeted for murdering his wife, P1, by giving her Sodium Cyanide. This is a most unfortunate... |
AILA_Q30||That the deceased P1 got married to P2, the 2nd respondent herein, in the year 2001. In her marital home, she was ill-treated by her parents-in-law, respondents 1 and 3 herein. They would constantly tell her that she was incapable of doing the house work properly, and her mother-in-law did not give her suffic... |
AILA_Q31||This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.5.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the Revisional Court and remanded the matter back to the Revisi... |
AILA_Q32||On 9th May, 2004, the marriage of the daughter of one P1, the brother of P2 PW.1, was to be solemnized in village Janephal, District Aurangabad. P2 PW.1, arranged a water tanker on the 6th May, 2004. As the tanker was being taken towards P2's house the accused appellants, obstructed the way by putting stones ... |
AILA_Q33||This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the High Court dated March 27, 1958, whereby the said High Court maintained the conviction of the appellant but reduced the sentence of four years' rigorous imprisonment passed on the appellant by the Special Judge, Kanpur, to two years' rigoro... |
AILA_Q34||These writ petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent nos. 4 and 5 were formerly Chief Ministers. It is alleged by the petitioners that they filed writ petitions before the High Court allegi... |
AILA_Q35||Two appellants, who are brothers, along with their father P1 was prosecuted for an offence. Prosecution case in that the appellants have a sweetmeat shop in L1. PW 6 P2 is residing in a house opposite to the shop. On April 13, 1980, P1, the father of the appellants requested P2 to permit him to tie a rope of ... |
AILA_Q36||Interpretation and/or application of Medical Benefit Rules applicable in the State S1 as also in the State S2 is in question before us in these appeals which arise out of the judgment and order dated 20th June, 2005 passed by S1 High Court in Writ Petition No. 10942 and that of the judgment and order dated 4t... |
AILA_Q37||Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by the High Court upholding conviction of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') and sentence as imposed by the trial Court which had sentenced each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, two years and seven years res... |
AILA_Q38||The appellant herein is a Senior Manager in a fertilizer company C1. The said company is engaged in manufacturing and selling of fertilizer. The Government of India in exercise of power has framed an order known as the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 for controlling the quality of fertilizer. It appears that... |
AILA_Q39||Challenge in this appeal is to the order of a High Court allowing the appeal filed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused'). The accused was convicted for offence and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation by Principal District ... |
AILA_Q40||Having been selected by the Public Service Commission, the respondent herein was appointed as Law Officer-cum-Draftsman in the Directorate of Cooperation. There was only one post in the same Cadre and it had no promotional avenues. He filed a representation that his post be upgraded or two promotional avenues... |
AILA_Q41||Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by High Court confirming his conviction for offence and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge. Background facts as unfolded during trial by the prosecution are essentially as follows. One P1 (hereinafter referre... |
AILA_Q42||This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 23.8.2016, passed by the High Court wherein High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant. Records reveal that the parents of the appellant, namely, P1 and P2, entered into an agreement to sell dated 14.1.1997 with Respondent No.2 herein. The sale co... |
AILA_Q43||Transfer Petition have been filed to transfer the petitions filed pending before the High Court of S1 to the High Court of S2. The petitioner got married to Lt. P1 on 09.03.2012 as per Hindu rites and customs. Petitioner's husband Lt. P1 is a naval officer who was then posted at S1. After marriage, the petiti... |
AILA_Q44||This petition is by the State directed against the order dated 10.11.1998 passed by the High Court by which the charges framed against the respondent were quashed. The relevant and necessary facts to dispose of this petition are: The respondent was working as a Road Transport Inspector in the Regional Office ... |
AILA_Q45||The appellants were tried for offences on the allegations that about four months prior to the incident, some quarrel had taken place between the deceased P1 and the appellant No. 4 P2 in relation to raising of boundary wall. On 12 April 1983 at about 7.00 P.M. the deceased accompanied by P3, had gone to P4 (P... |
AILA_Q46||In this appeal by special leave the sole appellant is P1 who alongwith six others was put up for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge in charged of the offence. It is not necessary to refer to the charges framed against the remaining accused since they are not appellants before us. The trial court by it... |
AILA_Q47||Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulations, as recorded by the Principal Sessions Judge. The prosecution versi... |
AILA_Q48||Whether sanction is required to initiate criminal proceedings in respect of offences is the question arising for consideration in these cases. The District Registrar lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police, CBCID on 07.07.1999. The main allegation against the respondents was that while they were worki... |
AILA_Q49||Appellant was a Patwari working at village V1 in the year 1976. On an allegation that he had sought illegal gratification, on or about 13 July 1976, a complaint was lodged in the office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption that the appellant had asked for illegal gratification. A raiding party ... |
AILA_Q50||A peculiar feature of this appeal by special leave is that it is not an appeal against conviction or against acquittal but one preferred by a prosecution witness for expunction of several highly derogatory remarks made against him by a learned Judge of the High Court while allowing a Criminal Appeal at the Hi... |
This folder contains the dataset of the AILA Track organized in FIRE 2019. |
Track Website : https://sites.google.com/view/fire-2019-aila/ |
Conference Website : http://fire.irsi.res.in/fire/2019/home |
====================================== |
Description of the folders : |
======================================= |
1. Folder Name : Object_casedocs |
======================================= |
* No. of files : 2914 |
* Description : Contains prior case documents, some of which are relevant to the given queries. In Task 1, the prior cases relevant to each query should be retrieved from this set of documents. [These documents can also be used for Task 2 to construct a training set for supervised models.] |
* Format : Each file in the folder is named as C<id>.txt, e.g., C1.txt, C2.txt, ..., C77.txt, ..., C2914.txt. The numbers in the file names are the identifiers of the cases. |
======================================= |
2. Folder Name : Object_statutes |
======================================= |
* No. of files : 197 |
* Description : Contains the title and description of 197 statutes, that are relevant to some of the given queries. |
*Format : |
a. Each file in the folder is named as S<id>.txt; the numbers in the file names are the identifiers of the statutes. |
b. Each file contains 2 lines. The first line is the title of the statute. The format is Title:<space><Titletext> |
c. The second line is the description. The format is Desc:<space><Descriptiontext> |
For example, the file name "S1.txt" contains the title and description of S1 statute. |
The first line gives the title: "Title: Power of High Courts to issue certain writs" |
The second line gives the description: "Desc: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Article 32 every High Court shall have powers, throughout the territories..." |
======================================= |
3. File Name : Query_doc.txt |
======================================= |
* Description : This file contains the 50 queries which are description of situations. Each query has an id such as AILA_Q1, AILA_Q2, ..., AILA_Q50. |
* Format of each line: QueryId||<QueryText> |
=================================================== |
4. File Name : relevance_judgments_priorcases.txt |
=================================================== |
* Description : contains the relevant prior-cases for a query |
* Format : <query-id> Q0 <document-id> <relevance> |
where, query_id : query identifier. eg., AILA_Q1, AILA_Q2,...., AILA_Q50 |
document-id : the prior case document (C1,C2,...,C2914) |
Relevance : 1, if the document is the correct answer to the query ; 0, otherwise |
*Example : |
AILA_Q1 Q0 C2341 0 ==> for the queryid AILA_Q1, C2341 is a wrong prior case |
AILA_Q4 Q0 C182 1 ==> for the queryid AILA_Q4, C182 is a correct prior case |
=================================================== |
5. File Name : relevance_judgments_statutes.txt |
=================================================== |
* Description : contains the relevant statutes for a query |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 10