text stringlengths 0 353 | EmoClass stringclasses 10
values | EmoAct float64 1 7 | EmoVal float64 1 7 | EmoDom float64 1 7 | SpkrID stringlengths 1 7 | Gender stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
we've been thinking about that scenario in particular as a really interesting case, a sort of [inaudible 00:05:13] case in many ways. | N | 4.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 1640 | Male |
answers to that. and so it's really interesting to think about in what ways copyright law was designed around this conclusion that the human brain- | X | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
and the human creator is a black box and to what degree we've actually romanticized that notion. and... | N | 3.8 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
to what degree it even forms part of the foundation for what is creative, right? | N | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 1639 | Male |
whether the fact that an ai could output. so i used 13- | X | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1640 | Male |
that make that fuzziness extremely, extremely clear- | X | 4 | 4 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
pulls into some of the basic presumptions about why we have the copyright doctrine at all. | N | 4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1640 | Male |
the underlying work was copyrighted. that would be a violat- | N | 4 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
to answer that question asked in 1965, what do we do about- | S | 4.6 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
and copyright production. but then i think your second question was sort of like- | N | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3 | 1640 | Male |
or complicate matters of the... | N | 2.8 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1639 | Male |
and maybe a band plays that. you have... | N | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 1640 | Male |
you have an ai that maybe is a kind of contributory infringe... | N | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 1640 | Male |
pen and certainly no willfulness maybe on the human... | X | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4 | 1640 | Male |
could have seen that this was trained on a single, drew was trained all on the beatles is that- | S | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 1640 | Male |
google is crawling a web all the time, right? | N | 3.2 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 1640 | Male |
imagine i'm just interested in the reproductive- | N | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
an example like the first example you share. | X | 3.4 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 1640 | Male |
in which programmatically what's going on in terms of the training data is really very similar computationally... | X | 4.4 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
so this is something that has happened with a lot of computationally created compilations of information is that court- | X | 5 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 1640 | Male |
and where all the inputs are one artist. and really the goal is to create an output that is essentially not that transformative. you want... | N | 4.6 | 5 | 4 | 1640 | Male |
a sort of massively multiple artist input where the goal is to teach it every- | N | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 1640 | Male |
then it doesn't reproduce any particular cityscape. there- | S | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
and then somebody does something and copyrights it. | A | 4.2 | 3 | 3.2 | Unknown | Unknown |
one is that if you can prove that something- | N | 3.6 | 4 | 3.8 | Unknown | Unknown |
there are certain themes, and this can be in literature, in painting, in music that are foundational elements of a genre, and can't be copyrighted. i- | N | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 1639 | Male |
look like. and so now what it can do is it can do automatic scene generation in that not only does it generate the style to transfer onto the scene- | H | 4 | 5.2 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
it's very hard now to trace that back to an individual human spark- | S | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 1639 | Male |
is romanticized. and i think we're also seeing here another kind of romanticism for the idea that we could, if only we were able to measure- | N | 4.2 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
a high enough precision. the world that we would be able to predict the future or... | X | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1639 | Male |
if it detective that people were sad. now that of course is an algorithm that was told- | N | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
bots don't have emotions. | N | 3.6 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
photographed other photographers photographs and then put them in a museum... | N | 3.2 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1639 | Male |
i know, i haven't seen a project like this, that sort of takes the posture of appropriation art and intending to very closely approach- | O | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 1640 | Male |
though, where for example, the intent might be to, for instance, | N | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
... both who are no longer alive. i think it- | H | 3.4 | 4.8 | 4 | Unknown | Unknown |
the last thing i wanted to add is that i think there's a real gap in digital literacy- | S | 3.4 | 3 | 3.8 | Unknown | Unknown |
and most of my students are just trying to hack the system anyway. so it's sort of interesting to see what | N | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4 | 1639 | Male |
be so i think it's a sort of open question as to whether, and i think the question... | N | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4 | 1639 | Male |
and what you have is a forgery engine.maybe | X | 5 | 4.6 | 4 | 1639 | Male |
we've seen. and i think the painting fool gets into this a bit, and certainly this- | N | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 1639 | Male |
about the relationship of art and | N | 4 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
use, what is there a kind of smaller degree of creativity that is- | X | 3.6 | 3.2 | 4 | 1639 | Male |
what do we be about that? | X | 3 | 4 | 3.4 | 1643 | Male |
essentially i'm going to talk a little bit at a fairly general level about something i'm very interested in and something that i'm... | H | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
as we all know, i think copyright and the other intellectual property rights or iprs are exclusive rights in the form of private property. | N | 5 | 4 | 5.2 | Unknown | Unknown |
that end? and here's where the rhetoric comes in. we've got a- | C | 4 | 3.8 | 5 | 1640 | Male |
bunch of labels behind, which there's quite a lot of substantive discourse and a lot of... | O | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 1639 | Male |
of this interplay between existing property rights and rhetoric- | X | 4.6 | 4.6 | 5 | 1640 | Male |
what is the future? if we've got rights battling rhetoric- | X | 4.8 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 1640 | Male |
at rock of copyright law derive from that particular background and from those partic- | N | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
despite i think the possibilities that throws up for us to reexamine this notion of all- | H | 5 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1640 | Male |
that much or the underlying assumptions about how copyright law works is really going to change that... | A | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1640 | Male |
not all of which i can go through here that have tried to achieve that sort of balance or that have tried to point to either... | N | 5 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1643 | Male |
context on the internet and for cyber law, the information commons, and within that, there're obviously subsets within the commons that- | X | 4.2 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
on the law making and judicial front that it may be possible... | N | 4.8 | 4.4 | 5 | 1639 | Male |
pick two, the public domain and the commons. and there are two reasons why i've picked these two concepts. one is that they have- | X | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1639 | Male |
come buzzwords, which to my mind leads to point number two, the risk that they might either be misunderstood or- | N | 4 | 4 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
economically culturally and socially, and for progress towards a greater democrat- | H | 5 | 4.6 | 5 | 1639 | Male |
and one of the shorthand summations of this entire discourse might be that the public domain is defined more in terms of what it is not. | X | 5 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
that's useful, but i'm not quite sure how far it gets us in trying to determine whether copyright has overreached too far- | X | 5 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 1643 | Male |
common understanding, a consensus even amongst lawyers and academics as to what the commons means... | N | 5 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 1640 | Male |
a third alternative that someone might offer is- | N | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
you find all of those usages used at one point or another- | H | 5.4 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 1639 | Male |
debate, or this discourse about where copyright is going. has it over expanded- | H | 4 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 1643 | Male |
uses the same kind of model and applies it to non-software- | N | 5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1640 | Male |
continuing discussion over all of these possibilities has led to increasing involvement by- | O | 4.4 | 4.2 | 5 | 1643 | Male |
groups other than lawyers, groups other than entrenched interests and... | X | 4.2 | 4.2 | 5 | 1639 | Male |
and that conception started influencing copyright law couple hundred years ago and continues to be a... | X | 4.4 | 3.6 | 5.2 | 1639 | Male |
object to certain limitations and exceptions, that doesn't... | N | 5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1643 | Male |
is that this means that by default we cling on to this notion of the individual author... | N | 4.6 | 4.4 | 5 | 1643 | Male |
and other forms of knowledge creation and knowledge sharing that are more communal or community based. | X | 3.6 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 1643 | Male |
the human rights framework. and i started discovering that in something like the past two or three years, that's been a small- | H | 5.4 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 1643 | Male |
court in considering a copyright case. also had to consider... | N | 4.8 | 4.6 | 5.6 | 1640 | Male |
so i think there is some glimmer that is a possibility and- | H | 3.6 | 5 | 4 | Unknown | Unknown |
to more clearly and fully integrate the development dimension into its norm setting and technical assistance... | N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1643 | Male |
but also its stability and going for the question, what can we actually do. | X | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1639 | Male |
pull a thread and change the structure. and so i'm thinking- | N | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.6 | Unknown | Unknown |
to go back to what i think we're both saying is we need to change the way it's done. | O | 5 | 3.2 | 5.2 | 1639 | Male |
change on that front. and... | N | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3 | 1639 | Male |
not unrestricting the users, but restricting for the end users that- | X | 2.2 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1639 | Male |
the rethinking of who the author is, could help- | X | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3 | 1643 | Male |
is in fact the primary art form and the role of the author changes, somehow i... | X | 2.2 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 1643 | Male |
the political stuff. | N | 4.2 | 3.6 | 4.2 | Unknown | Unknown |
that we're turning our children in the criminals because the way that they behave is so far from what's legally possible. | N | 4.4 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 1643 | Male |
and the assumptions. and then from that, you get new ideas as to real world solutions. and from that, you get a willingness to move away from the opacity. | H | 4 | 4.8 | 5 | 1643 | Male |
conversion experience that could take you from one way of looking at the world to another, which would include or disinclude... | X | 4.8 | 5 | 5.4 | 1639 | Male |
and never the two should meet... | N | 4 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 1639 | Male |
the 1940s and beyond | H | 2.8 | 4.2 | 4 | 1643 | Male |
presentation in both its- | N | 4 | 3.8 | 5 | Unknown | Unknown |
and finally the physicist had to go to the engineers and say- | N | 4.4 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 1639 | Male |
in effect. if you think about ibm coming into some company to tell them how to automate their process. | X | 4 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1640 | Male |
engineers had a very good engineering's toolkit. | N | 4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 1639 | Male |
putting a very complex and [inaudible 00:08:23] around that so that you feel like you've achieved something new and... | N | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 1639 | Male |
and it's a competition in the world of information dominance. | N | 3 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 1639 | Male |
clarification question. so- | N | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 1643 | Male |
judge, jury, and senior partner wonder if that's anything-sorry, i didn't understand the direct- | N | 2.6 | 4 | 4 | Unknown | Unknown |
as if we're talking to stupid people and even people who are not in technical fields- | X | 4.8 | 2.4 | 4.2 | Unknown | Unknown |
it's written for children and | X | 5.6 | 3.2 | 5 | 1639 | Male |
bad idea and it's a bad idea because there are a bunch of conversations that might... | N | 4.2 | 3.2 | 4 | 1640 | Male |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.