post_href
stringlengths
57
213
python_solutions
stringlengths
71
22.3k
slug
stringlengths
3
77
post_title
stringlengths
1
100
user
stringlengths
3
29
upvotes
int64
-20
1.2k
views
int64
0
60.9k
problem_title
stringlengths
3
77
number
int64
1
2.48k
acceptance
float64
0.14
0.91
difficulty
stringclasses
3 values
__index_level_0__
int64
0
34k
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2737982/LOWER-CASE-IN-SINGLE-LINE-CODE
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower() ```
to-lower-case
LOWER CASE IN SINGLE LINE CODE
festusmaithya264
0
1
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,700
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2730435/Python3-solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
Python3 solution
sipi09
0
1
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,701
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2710025/using-lower()-built-in-method
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
using lower() built in method
sindhu_300
0
6
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,702
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2699417/Python-simple-one-liner
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
Python simple one liner
imkprakash
0
3
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,703
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2694934/PYTHON3-BEST
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: ans = "" for c in s: n = ord(c) ans += chr(n+32) if n > 64 and n < 91 else c return ans
to-lower-case
PYTHON3 BEST
Gurugubelli_Anil
0
3
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,704
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2489010/Using-Python-String-lower()
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return(s.lower())
to-lower-case
Using Python String lower()
payek
0
19
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,705
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2409821/simple-ororone-line-solution-ororpython
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
simple ||one line solution ||python
Sneh713
0
5
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,706
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2251671/Python-using-ord()-and-chr()-to-utilize-ascii-values
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: ascii_A, ascii_Z, diff_aA = ord('A'), ord('Z'), ord('a') - ord('A') chars = [] # Iterate each char in string for ch in s: # Get the ascii numeric value of char ascii_value = ord(ch) # If value indicates char is uppercase if ascii_A <= ascii_value <= ascii_Z: # Add to the ascii value, the difference to make into its lowercase version ascii_value += diff_aA # Add the char version of transformed/not ascii value into chars chars.append(chr(ascii_value)) # Return the stringified version return ''.join(chars)
to-lower-case
Python using ord() and chr() to utilize ascii values
graceiscoding
0
11
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,707
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2198620/Python-Simple-Python-Solution-Using-Two-Approach
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: s = list(s) lowercase = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' uppercase = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' for i in range(len(s)): if s[i] in uppercase: index = uppercase.index(s[i]) s[i] = lowercase[index] return ''.join(s)
to-lower-case
[ Python ] βœ…βœ… Simple Python Solution Using Two Approach πŸ₯³βœŒπŸ‘
ASHOK_KUMAR_MEGHVANSHI
0
58
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,708
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2198620/Python-Simple-Python-Solution-Using-Two-Approach
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
[ Python ] βœ…βœ… Simple Python Solution Using Two Approach πŸ₯³βœŒπŸ‘
ASHOK_KUMAR_MEGHVANSHI
0
58
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,709
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2160093/Python-one-liner
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
Python one liner
pro6igy
0
30
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,710
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2137886/lower-case
class Solution(object): def toLowerCase(self, s): """ :type s: str :rtype: str """ return s.lower()
to-lower-case
lower case
abhinav0904
0
42
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,711
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2130039/Python-inbuilt-function
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
Python inbuilt function
yashkumarjha
0
54
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,712
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/2064621/Python-List-Comprehension-2-liners-lambda-%2B-walrus
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: hmap = dict(zip(string.ascii_uppercase,string.ascii_lowercase)) # Solution 1 return ''.join(hmap.get(letter, letter) for letter in s) # Solution 2 # lambda + walrus (assignment expression) # to_lower = lambda x: hmap.get(x, x) # return ''.join( # (x := to_lower(letter)) # for letter in s # )
to-lower-case
Python List Comprehension [2 liners] / lambda + walrus
kedeman
0
32
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,713
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1866445/Python3-Easy-One-line-Solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
[Python3] Easy One-line Solution
natscripts
0
71
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,714
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1854482/Python-one-line-solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
Python one line solution
alishak1999
0
35
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,715
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1780847/python-oneliner
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
python oneliner
kakchaudhary
0
54
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,716
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1368988/Python3-ASCII-Solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: retstring = "" for i in range(0, len(s)): if ord(s[i]) in range(65, 91): newchar = ord(s[i]) + 32 retstring += chr(newchar) else: retstring += s[i] return retstring
to-lower-case
Python3 ASCII Solution
RobertObrochta
0
80
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,717
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1228849/python-ez-understanding-solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: DIFF_BETWEEN_LOWER_UPPER = ord('a') - ord('A') output = '' for char in s: # A to Z if ord(char) >= 65 and ord(char) <= 90: output += chr(ord(char) + DIFF_BETWEEN_LOWER_UPPER) else: output += char return output
to-lower-case
python ez understanding solution
yingziqing123
0
25
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,718
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1208766/Python-Easy-ASCII-Code-Solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, str: str) -> str: diff = ord('a') - ord('A') res = "" print(ord('a')) print(ord('z')) print(ord('A')) print(ord('Z')) for i in range(len(str)): idx = ord(str[i]) if(idx>=97 and idx<=122 or idx>=65 and idx<=90): if (idx<97): res += chr(idx+diff) else: res += str[i] else: res += str[i] return res # return str.lower()
to-lower-case
Python Easy ASCII Code Solution
bagdaulet881
0
105
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,719
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1146502/Python3-solution-(ASCII)
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, string: str) -> str: if not string: return string result: str = '' for char in string: result += chr(ord(char) + 32) if 65 <= ord(char) <= 90 else char return result
to-lower-case
Python3 solution (ASCII)
alexforcode
0
74
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,720
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/1011962/Runtime%3A-20-ms-solution-with-Python-Generators
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, str: str) -> str: def gen(string): for i in string: yield chr(ord(i) + 32) if 65 <= ord(i) <= 90 else i return "".join(gen(str))
to-lower-case
Runtime: 20 ms solution with Python Generators
hotassun
0
81
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,721
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/915045/Memory-and-time-efficient-Python-3-solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, str: str) -> str: res = [] for i in str: avalue = ord(i) if(avalue<91 and avalue>64): res.append(chr(avalue + 32)) else: res.append(i) return ''.join(res)
to-lower-case
Memory and time efficient Python 3 solution
billvamva
0
57
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,722
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/781487/Python-Easy-Solution
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, str: str) -> str: for i in str: if 65<=ord(i)<=97: str=str.replace(i,chr(ord(i)+32)) return str
to-lower-case
Python Easy Solution
lokeshsenthilkumar
0
308
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,723
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/762158/Python-3-using-ASCII-Trick.
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, str: str) -> str: res = '' space = ord(' ') for letter in str: if ord(letter) in range(65,91): res += chr(ord(letter) ^ space) else: res += letter return res
to-lower-case
Python 3 using ASCII Trick.
Renegade9819
0
118
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,724
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/384694/Python3-a-few-solutions
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: return s.lower()
to-lower-case
[Python3] a few solutions
ye15
0
145
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,725
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/384694/Python3-a-few-solutions
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: mp = dict(zip(ascii_uppercase, ascii_lowercase)) return "".join(mp.get(c, c) for c in s)
to-lower-case
[Python3] a few solutions
ye15
0
145
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,726
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/384694/Python3-a-few-solutions
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: s = list(s) for i in range(len(s)): if s[i].isupper(): s[i] = chr(ord(s[i]) ^ 32) # convert lowercase to uppercase or uppercase to lowercase return "".join(s)
to-lower-case
[Python3] a few solutions
ye15
0
145
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,727
https://leetcode.com/problems/to-lower-case/discuss/294452/python-soultion
class Solution: def toLowerCase(self, s: str) -> str: output = '' for char in s: ascii_index = ord(char) if 65 <= ascii_index <= 90: output += chr(ascii_index+32) else: output += char return output
to-lower-case
python soultion
mike_d0_ob
0
237
to lower case
709
0.82
Easy
11,728
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/2389935/faster-than-99.73-or-Python3-or-solution
class Solution: def __init__(self, n: int, blacklist: List[int]): self.hashmap={} for b in blacklist: self.hashmap[b]=-1 self.length=n-len(blacklist) flag=n-1 for b in blacklist: if b<self.length: while flag in self.hashmap: flag-=1 self.hashmap[b]=flag flag-=1 def pick(self) -> int: seed=random.randrange(self.length) return self.hashmap.get(seed,seed) # Your Solution object will be instantiated and called as such: # obj = Solution(n, blacklist) # param_1 = obj.pick()
random-pick-with-blacklist
faster than 99.73% | Python3 | solution
vimla_kushwaha
1
152
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,729
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/1683829/710.-Random-Pick-with-Blacklist-via-Hash-map
class Solution: def __init__(self, n, blacklist): self.whiteSize = n - len(blacklist) self.hmap = {ele: 1 for ele in blacklist} idx = n - 1 for ele in self.hmap: if ele >= self.whiteSize: continue while idx in self.hmap: idx -= 1 self.hmap[ele] = idx idx -= 1 def pick(self): index = randint(0, self.whiteSize - 1) if index in self.hmap: return self.hmap[index] return index
random-pick-with-blacklist
710. Random Pick with Blacklist via Hash map
zwang198
1
102
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,730
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/2806536/Python-ranges
class Solution: def __init__(self, n: int, blacklist): self.n = n self.ranges = [] self.index = 0 def insertIntoRanges(n): left = 0 right = len(self.ranges) - 1 while left <= right: middle = left + (right - left) // 2 a, b = self.ranges[middle] if n >= a and n <= b: return if n - 1 == b: self.ranges[middle][1] = n if middle + 1 < len(self.ranges): a1, b1 = self.ranges[middle + 1] if n + 1 == a1: self.ranges[middle] = [a, b1] self.ranges.pop(middle + 1) else: self.ranges[middle] = [a, n] else: self.ranges[middle] = [a, n] return if n + 1 == a: self.ranges[middle][0] = n if middle - 1 >= 0: a1, b1 = self.ranges[middle - 1] if n - 1 == b1: self.ranges[middle] = [a1, b] self.ranges.pop(middle - 1) else: self.ranges[middle] = [n, b] else: self.ranges[middle] = [n, b] return if n > b: left = middle + 1 elif n < a: right = middle - 1 self.ranges.insert(left, [n, n]) for n in blacklist: if not self.ranges: self.ranges.append([n, n]) continue insertIntoRanges(n) if self.ranges: self.ranges.append([self.n, float('inf')]) self.current = -1 self.allBanned = self.ranges and (self.ranges[0][0] <= 0 and self.ranges[0][1] >= self.n - 1) def pick(self) -> int: if self.allBanned: return -1 self.current += 1 if self.current >= self.n: self.current = 0 self.index = 0 if not self.ranges: return self.current a, b = self.ranges[self.index] while self.current >= a: self.current = b + 1 if self.current >= self.n: self.current = 0 self.index = 0 else: self.index += 1 a, b = self.ranges[self.index] return self.current
random-pick-with-blacklist
Python, ranges
swepln
0
3
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,731
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/2757505/Map-invalid-to-valid%3A-dict()
class Solution: def __init__(self, n: int, blacklist: List[int]): self.black2valid = dict() self.n = n self.validSize = n - len(blacklist) # Save all blacks in map, make sure mapping destinations are not in blacklist for b in blacklist: self.black2valid[b] = -1 last = n-1 for b in blacklist: #[!] Only swap blacks in [0, validSize) to [validSize, n) if b >= self.validSize: continue while last in self.black2valid: last -= 1 self.black2valid[b] = last #[!] DONT forget to update 'last' last -= 1 def pick(self) -> int: res = random.randint(0, self.validSize-1) if res in self.black2valid: res = self.black2valid[res] return res
random-pick-with-blacklist
Map invalid to valid: dict()
KKCrush
0
6
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,732
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/2736861/Python-Hashmap-Simple
class Solution: def __init__(self, n: int, blacklist: List[int]): d = len(blacklist) m = {} bs = set(blacklist) tb_mapped = [x for x in range(d+1) if x not in bs] for x in blacklist: if x >= d: # its in the second half y = tb_mapped.pop(0) m[x] = y self.m = m start, end = d, n-1 self.randint = lambda : randint(start, end) def pick(self) -> int: i = self.randint() return self.m.get(i, i) # Your Solution object will be instantiated and called as such: # obj = Solution(n, blacklist) # param_1 = obj.pick()
random-pick-with-blacklist
Python - Hashmap - Simple
naraharisetti
0
11
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,733
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/2666338/python-or-hashmap
class Solution: def __init__(self, n: int, blacklist: List[int]): # because the size of blacklist may be much smaller than blacklist # so I am supposed to use blacklist mapping m = len(blacklist) # we will search the whitelist in this area, size is n - m self.newsize, last = n - m, n - 1 # in order to search info in o(1) black = set(blacklist) self.mapping = {} for num in blacklist: if num >= self.newsize: continue while last in black: last -= 1 self.mapping[num] = last # don't forget reduce the scale of mapping last -= 1 def pick(self) -> int: # index of the whitelist array is (0, n - m - 1) rand = random.randint(0, self.newsize - 1) return self.mapping[rand] if rand in self.mapping else rand
random-pick-with-blacklist
python | hashmap
MichelleZou
0
27
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,734
https://leetcode.com/problems/random-pick-with-blacklist/discuss/1780188/Python-Dict-Mapping-or-O(1)
class Solution: def __init__(self, n: int, blacklist: List[int]): # The size of whitelist self.white_len = n - len(blacklist) # Last index of the array self.last_idx = n - 1 # Mapping dictionary self.mapping = {} # Set the index of blacklist element all to -1 for i in blacklist: self.mapping[i] = -1 for i in blacklist: # skip blacklist if i >= self.white_len: continue while self.last_idx in blacklist: self.last_idx -= 1 self.mapping[i] = self.last_idx self.last_idx -= 1 def pick(self) -> int: idx = randint(0,self.white_len-1) if idx in self.mapping: return self.mapping[idx] return idx
random-pick-with-blacklist
Python Dict Mapping | O(1)
Fayeyf
0
115
random pick with blacklist
710
0.337
Hard
11,735
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/1516574/Greedy-oror-DP-oror-Same-as-LCS
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: def lcs(s,p): m,n = len(s),len(p) dp = [[0 for _ in range(n+1)] for _ in range(m+1)] for i in range(m): for j in range(n): if s[i]==p[j]: dp[i+1][j+1] = dp[i][j]+ord(s[i]) else: dp[i+1][j+1] = max(dp[i+1][j],dp[i][j+1]) return dp[-1][-1] common = lcs(s1,s2) total,res = 0,0 for c in s1: total+=ord(c) for c in s2: total+=ord(c) res = total - common*2 return res
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
πŸ“ŒπŸ“Œ Greedy || DP || Same as LCS 🐍
abhi9Rai
4
94
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,736
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/534770/Python3-top-down-dp
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: @lru_cache(None) def fn(i, j): """Return minimum ASCII delete sum for s1[i:] and s2[j:].""" if i == len(s1): return sum(ord(s2[jj]) for jj in range(j, len(s2))) if j == len(s2): return sum(ord(s1[ii]) for ii in range(i, len(s1))) if s1[i] == s2[j]: return fn(i+1, j+1) return min(ord(s1[i]) + fn(i+1, j), ord(s2[j]) + fn(i, j+1)) return fn(0, 0)
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
[Python3] top-down dp
ye15
1
63
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,737
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/2789414/python-super-easy-understand-dp-top-down
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: def ascii_sum(s): return sum(map(lambda x: ord(x), list(s))) @functools.lru_cache(None) def dp(s1, s2): if not s1 and not s2: return 0 if not s1: return ascii_sum(s2) if not s2: return ascii_sum(s1) ans = float("inf") if s1[0] == s2[0]: ans = min(ans, dp(s1[1:], s2[1:])) ans = min(ans, ord(s2[0]) + dp(s1, s2[1:]), ord(s1[0]) + dp(s1[1:], s2), ord(s1[0]) + ord(s2[0]) + dp(s1[1:], s2[1:])) return ans return dp(s1, s2)
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
python super easy understand dp top down
harrychen1995
0
1
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,738
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/2785187/Python-oror-easy-solu-oror-using-DP-Bottom-up-approach
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: m=len(s1) n=len(s2) dp=[] for i in range (m+1): dp.append([0]*(n+1)) asc=0 for i in range (1,m+1): asc+=ord(s1[i-1]) dp[i][0]=asc asc=0 for j in range (1,n+1): asc+=ord(s2[j-1]) dp[0][j]=asc #print(dp) for i in range (1,m+1): for j in range (1,n+1): if s1[i-1]==s2[j-1]: dp[i][j]=dp[i-1][j-1] else: dp[i][j]=min(dp[i-1][j]+ord(s1[i-1]),dp[i][j-1]+ord(s2[j-1])) return dp[-1][-1]
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
Python || easy solu || using DP Bottom up approach
tush18
0
3
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,739
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/2750790/Python3-or-Easy-Solution
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: m = len(s1) n = len(s2) table = [[0 for x in range(n+1)] for x in range(m+1)] total = 0 Flag = True for i in range(1,m+1): total+=ord(s1[i-1]) for j in range(1,n+1): if(Flag): total+=ord(s2[j-1]) if(s1[i-1]==s2[j-1]): table[i][j] = max(table[i-1][j],table[i][j-1],table[i-1][j-1]+ord(s1[i-1])) else: table[i][j] = max(table[i-1][j],table[i][j-1]) Flag = False return total-table[-1][-1]*2
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
Python3 | Easy Solution
ty2134029
0
4
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,740
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/2305648/Python3-Solution-with-using-dp
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: dp = [[0] * (len(s2) + 1) for _ in range(len(s1) + 1)] for i in range(1, len(s1) + 1): dp[i][0] = ord(s1[i - 1]) + dp[i - 1][0] for j in range(1, len(s2) + 1): dp[0][j] = ord(s2[j - 1]) + dp[0][j - 1] for i in range(1, len(s1) + 1): for j in range(1, len(s2) + 1): if s1[i - 1] == s2[j - 1]: dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1] else: dp[i][j] = min(dp[i - 1][j] + ord(s1[i - 1]), dp[i][j - 1] + ord(s2[j - 1])) return dp[-1][-1]
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
[Python3] Solution with using dp
maosipov11
0
18
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,741
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings/discuss/1673245/Python-DP-1-D
class Solution: def minimumDeleteSum(self, s1: str, s2: str) -> int: @lru_cache(None) def getASCII(char): return ord(char) if len(s1) < len(s2): s1, s2 = s2, s1 m, n = len(s1), len(s2) dp = [0]*(n+1) for i in range(1, n+1): dp[i] += dp[i-1] + getASCII(s2[i-1]) for i in range(1, m+1): new_dp = [0]*(n+1) new_dp[0] = dp[0] + getASCII(s1[i-1]) for j in range(1, n+1): if s1[i-1] == s2[j-1]: new_dp[j] = dp[j-1] else: new_dp[j] = min(getASCII(s1[i-1])+dp[j], getASCII(s2[j-1])+new_dp[j-1]) dp = new_dp return dp[-1]
minimum-ascii-delete-sum-for-two-strings
Python DP 1-D
sankitshane
0
33
minimum ascii delete sum for two strings
712
0.623
Medium
11,742
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/481917/Python-sol.-based-on-sliding-window.-run-time-90%2B-w-Explanation
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: if k <= 1: # Quick response for invalid k on product of positive numbers return 0 else: left_sentry = 0 num_of_subarray = 0 product_of_subarry = 1 # update right bound of sliding window for right_sentry in range( len(nums) ): product_of_subarry *= nums[right_sentry] # update left bound of sliding window while product_of_subarry >= k: product_of_subarry //= nums[left_sentry] left_sentry += 1 # Note: # window size = right_sentry - left_sentry + 1 # update number of subarrary with product < k num_of_subarray += right_sentry - left_sentry + 1 return num_of_subarray
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python sol. based on sliding window. run-time 90%+ [ w/ Explanation ]
brianchiang_tw
3
723
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,743
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/1805381/Python-3-sliding-window-O(n)-O(1)
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: if k <= 1: return 0 res = 0 product = 1 left = 0 for right, num in enumerate(nums): product *= num while product >= k: product //= nums[left] left += 1 res += right - left + 1 return res
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python 3, sliding window, O(n) / O(1)
dereky4
2
242
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,744
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/1616411/Easy-to-understand-python3-sliding-window-solution
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: n=len(nums) left=0 res=0 prod=1 for right in range(n): prod*=nums[right] while prod>=k and left<=right: prod=prod/nums[left] left+=1 res+=(right-left+1) return res
subarray-product-less-than-k
Easy to understand python3 sliding window solution
Karna61814
1
54
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,745
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/1023283/Python-From-TLE-to-AC-greater-Leading-and-Lagging-Two-Pointer-Approach
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: prefix, result = [1] + list(itertools.accumulate(nums, operator.mul)), 0 for i in range(1, len(prefix)): for j in range(0, i): if prefix[i] // prefix[j] < k: result += (i-j) break return result
subarray-product-less-than-k
[Python] From TLE to AC --> Leading & Lagging Two Pointer Approach
dev-josh
1
117
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,746
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/1023283/Python-From-TLE-to-AC-greater-Leading-and-Lagging-Two-Pointer-Approach
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: result = 0 product = 1 lagging = 0 for leading in range(len(nums)): product *= nums[leading] while product >= k and lagging <= leading: product /= nums[lagging] lagging += 1 sub_arr_len = leading - lagging + 1 result += sub_arr_len return result
subarray-product-less-than-k
[Python] From TLE to AC --> Leading & Lagging Two Pointer Approach
dev-josh
1
117
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,747
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/869622/Python3-Simple-Sliding-Window-with-comments
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: # Edge cases if len(nums) < 1: return 0 if len(nums) < 2: return 1 if nums[0] < k else 0 # Count all the single element subset of the arrays that are less than k count = 0 for num in nums: count += 1 if num < k else 0 # Maintain a sliding window from left=[0] to right=[1]. Whenever the current product of the window reaches over # the limit - k, move the left pointer until the limit (of product < k) is satisfied again. cur = nums[0] left, right = 0, 1 while right < len(nums): cur *= nums[right] while left < right and cur >= k: cur //= nums[left] left += 1 count += (right - left) right += 1 return count
subarray-product-less-than-k
[Python3] Simple Sliding Window with comments
nachiketsd
1
71
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,748
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/869070/Python3-sliding-window
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: ans = ii = 0 prod = 1 for i, x in enumerate(nums): prod *= x while ii <= i and k <= prod: prod //= nums[ii] ii += 1 ans += i - ii + 1 return ans
subarray-product-less-than-k
[Python3] sliding window
ye15
1
88
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,749
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2833258/Python-O(n)-solution-Accepted
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: if k <= 1: return 0 ans: int = 0 left: int = 0 prod: int = 1 for right, val in enumerate(nums): prod *= val while prod >= k: prod /= nums[left] left += 1 ans += right - left + 1 return ans
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python O(n) solution [Accepted]
lllchak
0
1
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,750
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2812575/Python-Easy-Solution-Sliding-Window
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: ans = 0 left = 0 right = 0 product = 1 while right < len(nums): # Get the number, extend right part of the window, and record product n = nums[right] product = product * n while product >= k and left <= right: # update left part of the window by conditions d = nums[left] product = product / d left += 1 ans += right - left + 1 # update answer, +1 because of the update of right part of the window right += 1 return ans
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python Easy Solution Sliding Window
yl9539
0
1
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,751
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2793423/Python-or-Simple-or-Sliding-Window-or-O(n)
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: start, product, result = 0, 1, 0 for end in range(len(nums)): curr_val = nums[end] product *= curr_val while product >= k and start <= end: product = product / nums[start] start += 1 if product < k: result += end - start + 1 return result
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python | Simple | Sliding Window | O(n)
david-cobbina
0
4
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,752
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2723155/Python3-Two-pointers-Solution
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: left = 0 mult = 1 ans = 0 if k <= 1: return 0 for right in range(len(nums)): mult *= nums[right] while mult >= k: mult = mult // nums[left] left += 1 ans += (right-left+1) return ans
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python3 Two pointers Solution
DietCoke777
0
7
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,753
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2722993/Two-Pointer-Python-Solution
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: left = 0 mult = 1 ans = 0 if k <= 1: return 0 for right in range(len(nums)): mult *= nums[right] while mult >= k: mult = mult // nums[left] left += 1 ans += (right-left+1) return ans
subarray-product-less-than-k
Two Pointer Python Solution
DietCoke777
0
2
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,754
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2711317/Python-EASY-sliding-window
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: prod = 1 left = 0 count = 0 for right,v in enumerate(nums): prod *= v while prod >= k and left <= right: prod //= nums[left] left += 1 count += right - left + 1 return count
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python EASY sliding window
anu1rag
0
4
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,755
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/2641534/Python-easy-approach-pattern-fixed-size-sliding-windows
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: count = 0 i = 0 multi = 1 for j in range(len(nums)): multi *= nums[j] while(multi >= k and i <= j): multi //= nums[i] i += 1 if(multi < k): count += j-i+1 return count
subarray-product-less-than-k
Python easy approach pattern fixed size sliding windows
rajitkumarchauhan99
0
6
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,756
https://leetcode.com/problems/subarray-product-less-than-k/discuss/1465457/PyPy3-Simple-solution-using-two-for-loops-w-comments
class Solution: def numSubarrayProductLessThanK(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int: # Init n = len(nums) m = 0 # no. of subarrays # Base Case if k == 0: return 0 # Base Case if sum(nums) == n: return (n)*(n+1)//2 if k > 1 else 0 # For each element for i,num_i in enumerate(nums): # Calc curr product curr_prod = num_i # Check if is less then k, else continue if curr_prod < k: m += 1 else: continue # For each j from i+1 to n-1 for num_j in nums[i+1:]: # calc current product curr_prod = curr_prod * num_j # Check if is less then k, else break if curr_prod < k: m += 1 else: break return m
subarray-product-less-than-k
[Py/Py3] Simple solution using two for loops w/ comments
ssshukla26
0
74
subarray product less than k
713
0.452
Medium
11,757
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1532323/Python3-dp
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int]) -> int: buy, sell = inf, 0 for x in prices: buy = min(buy, x) sell = max(sell, x - buy) return sell
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] dp
ye15
4
78
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,758
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1532323/Python3-dp
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int]) -> int: buy, sell = inf, 0 for x in prices: buy = min(buy, x - sell) sell = max(sell, x - buy) return sell
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] dp
ye15
4
78
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,759
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1532323/Python3-dp
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int]) -> int: buy, sell = [inf]*2, [0]*2 for x in prices: for i in range(2): if i: buy[i] = min(buy[i], x - sell[i-1]) else: buy[i] = min(buy[i], x) sell[i] = max(sell[i], x - buy[i]) return sell[1]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] dp
ye15
4
78
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,760
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1532323/Python3-dp
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, k: int, prices: List[int]) -> int: if k >= len(prices)//2: return sum(max(0, prices[i] - prices[i-1]) for i in range(1, len(prices))) buy, sell = [inf]*k, [0]*k for x in prices: for i in range(k): if i: buy[i] = min(buy[i], x - sell[i-1]) else: buy[i] = min(buy[i], x) sell[i] = max(sell[i], x - buy[i]) return sell[-1] if k and prices else 0
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] dp
ye15
4
78
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,761
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1532323/Python3-dp
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int]) -> int: buy, cooldown, sell = inf, 0, 0 for x in prices: buy = min(buy, x - cooldown) cooldown = sell sell = max(sell, x - buy) return sell
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] dp
ye15
4
78
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,762
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1532323/Python3-dp
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: buy, sell = inf, 0 for x in prices: buy = min(buy, x - sell) sell = max(sell, x - buy - fee) return sell
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] dp
ye15
4
78
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,763
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2179215/Python-or-4-Approaches-or-Entire-DP-or
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: n = len(prices) dp = [[-1 for i in range(2)] for i in range(n+1)] dp[n][0] = dp[n][1] = 0 ind = n-1 while(ind>=0): for buy in range(2): if(buy): profit = max(-prices[ind]-fee + dp[ind+1][0], 0 + dp[ind+1][1]) else: profit = max(prices[ind] + dp[ind+1][1], 0 + dp[ind+1][0]) dp[ind][buy] = profit ind -= 1 return dp[0][1]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python | 4 Approaches | Entire DP |
LittleMonster23
2
68
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,764
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2179215/Python-or-4-Approaches-or-Entire-DP-or
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: n = len(prices) ahead = [0 for i in range(2)] curr = [0 for i in range(2)] ahead[0] = ahead[1] = 0 ind = n-1 while(ind>=0): for buy in range(2): if(buy): profit = max(-prices[ind]-fee + ahead[0], 0 + ahead[1]) else: profit = max(prices[ind] + ahead[1], 0 + ahead[0]) curr[buy] = profit ahead = [x for x in curr] ind -= 1 return ahead[1]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python | 4 Approaches | Entire DP |
LittleMonster23
2
68
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,765
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1772301/Java-Python3-Simple-DP-Solution-(Top-Down-and-Bottom-Up)
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: n = len(prices) @lru_cache(None) def dp(i: int, holding: int): if i == n: return 0 do_nothing = dp(i+1, holding) do_something = 0 if holding: # sell stock do_something = prices[i]-fee + dp(i+1, 0) else: # buy stock do_something = -prices[i] + dp(i+1, 1) return max(do_nothing, do_something) return dp(0, 0)
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
βœ… [Java / Python3] Simple DP Solution (Top-Down & Bottom-Up)
JawadNoor
2
108
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,766
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1772301/Java-Python3-Simple-DP-Solution-(Top-Down-and-Bottom-Up)
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: n = len(prices) dp = [[0]*2 for _ in range(n+1)] for i in range(n-1, -1, -1): for holding in range(2): do_nothing = dp[i+1][holding] if holding: # sell stock do_something = prices[i]-fee+dp[i+1][0] else: do_something = -prices[i] + dp[i+1][1] dp[i][holding] = max(do_nothing, do_something) return dp[0][0]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
βœ… [Java / Python3] Simple DP Solution (Top-Down & Bottom-Up)
JawadNoor
2
108
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,767
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2430429/Python-Easy-Memoization-Solution
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: memo = {} def dfs(index, buy): if index>=len(prices): return 0 if (index, buy) in memo: return memo[(index, buy)] res = 0 if buy: yb = dfs(index+1, not buy)-prices[index] nb = dfs(index+1, buy) res = max(yb, nb) else: ys = dfs(index+1, not buy)+prices[index]-fee ns = dfs(index+1, buy) res = max(ys, ns) memo[(index,buy)] = res return res return dfs(0,True)
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python Easy Memoization Solution
joelkurien
1
65
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,768
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1592779/Python-oror-Easy-Solution-oror-O(n)-and-without-extra-space
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, lst: List[int], fee: int) -> int: old_buy, old_sell = -lst[0], 0 for i in range(1, len(lst)): new_buy, new_sell = 0, 0 if (old_sell - lst[i]) > old_buy: new_buy = (old_sell - lst[i]) else: new_buy = old_buy if (lst[i] + old_buy - fee) > old_sell: new_sell = (lst[i] + old_buy - fee) else: new_sell = old_sell old_buy, old_sell = new_buy, new_sell return old_sell
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python || Easy Solution || O(n) and without extra space
naveenrathore
1
74
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,769
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/840566/very-simple-python3-solution-or-memoization-or-recursive
class Solution: def Util(self, i, prices, fee, bought, l, mem): if i >= l: return 0 if (i, bought) in mem: return mem[(i, bought)] if not bought: cur = max((self.Util(i + 1, prices, fee, True, l, mem) - prices[i]), self.Util(i + 1, prices, fee, False, l, mem)) else: cur = max((self.Util(i + 1, prices, fee, False, l, mem) + prices[i] - fee), self.Util(i + 1, prices, fee, True, l, mem)) mem[(i, bought)] = cur return cur def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: return self.Util(0, prices, fee, False, len(prices), dict())
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
very simple python3 solution | memoization | recursive
_YASH_
1
161
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,770
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2817354/Python-(Simple-DP)
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices, fee): @lru_cache(None) def dp(idx,canBuy): if idx >= len(prices): return 0 max_val = dp(idx+1,canBuy) if canBuy: max_val = max(max_val,dp(idx+1,False)-prices[idx]) else: max_val = max(max_val,dp(idx+1,True)+prices[idx]-fee) return max_val return dp(0,True)
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python (Simple DP)
rnotappl
0
2
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,771
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2731047/Python3-or-O(n)-Solution
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: stack = [] ans = 0 for price in prices: if(len(stack)==0): stack.append(price) elif(len(stack)==1): if(price-stack[-1]>fee): stack.append(price) elif(price<stack[-1]): stack[-1] = price else: if(price>stack[-1]): stack[-1] = price elif(stack[-1]-price>=fee): ans+=stack[-1]-stack[-2]-fee stack = [price] if(len(stack)>1): ans+=stack[-1]-stack[-2]-fee return ans
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python3 | O(n) Solution
ty2134029
0
4
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,772
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2691596/Simple-Python-solution-or-Caching-or-DP
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: dp = {} def dfs(i, buying): if i >= len(prices): return 0 if (i,buying) in dp: return dp[(i,buying)] ans = dfs(i+1, buying) if buying: buy = dfs(i+1, False) ans = max(ans, buy - prices[i]) else: sell = dfs(i+1, True) ans = max(ans, sell + prices[i] - fee) dp[(i,buying)] = ans return dp[(i,buying)] return dfs(0, True)
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Simple Python solution | Caching | DP
user1508i
0
10
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,773
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2639528/DP-Table-solution-in-Python
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: # dp[i][0 or 1] indicates the max profit on i-th day when currently holding stock(1) or not(0) with unlimited buys/sells n = len(prices) # number of days dp = [[0] * 2 for i in range(n)] dp[0][1] = -prices[0] - fee for i in range(1, n): dp[i][0] = max(dp[i-1][0], dp[i-1][1] + prices[i]) # sell stock on i-th day dp[i][1] = max(dp[i-1][1], dp[i-1][0] - prices[i] - fee) # buy stock on i-th day return dp[n-1][0]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
DP Table solution in Python
leqinancy
0
6
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,774
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2431697/Python-DP-solution-(Memoization)
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee : int) -> int: d = {} def bs(index, buyOrNotBuy): if index >= len(prices): return 0 # if we are able to buy the stock, if we already sold it before or # if we have not bought any stock if buyOrNotBuy == "buy": # if buy stock at this index if (index+1, "notBuy") not in d: profit = -1 * prices[index] + bs(index+1, "notBuy") else: profit = -1 * prices[index] + d[(index+1, "notBuy")] # if buy later, not now at this index if (index+1, "buy") not in d: profit1 = bs(index+1, "buy") else: profit1 = d[(index+1, "buy")] d[(index, buyOrNotBuy)] = max(profit, profit1) return d[(index, buyOrNotBuy)] else: # sell stock, if we sell 2nd argument is buy # sell stock at this index if (index+1, "buy") not in d: profit = prices[index] + bs(index+1, "buy") - fee else: profit = prices[index] + d[(index+1, "buy")] - fee # sell stock not at this index now, sell it later if (index+1, "notBuy") not in d: profit1 = bs(index+1, "notBuy") else: profit1 = d[(index+1, "notBuy")] d[(index, buyOrNotBuy)] = max(profit, profit1) return d[(index, buyOrNotBuy)] return bs(0, "buy")
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python DP solution (Memoization)
DietCoke777
0
21
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,775
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/2238166/Buy-and-sell-stock-2-variation-slight-change-pythin
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: n=len(prices) dp=[[0 for _ in range(2)] for _ in range(n+1)] # base case , when array get exhausted , profit is always 0 for buy in range(2): dp[n][buy]=0 for i in range(n-1,-1,-1): for buy in range(2): profit=0 # Buy or do-not buy if buy: profit+=max(-prices[i]+dp[i+1][0],dp[i+1][1]) else: # sell or don't sell , subtract transaction fees after each transaction profit+=max(prices[i]-fee+dp[i+1][1],dp[i+1][0]) dp[i][buy]=profit return dp[0][1]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Buy and sell stock 2 variation , slight change , pythin
Aniket_liar07
0
37
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,776
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1784145/Python-easy-to-read-and-understand-or-DP
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: n = len(prices) t = [[0 for _ in range(2)] for _ in range(n)] t[0][0], t[0][1] = -prices[0], 0 for i in range(1, n): t[i][0] = max(t[i-1][0], t[i-1][1]-prices[i]) t[i][1] = max(t[i-1][1], t[i-1][0]+prices[i]-fee) return max(t[n-1])
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
Python easy to read and understand | DP
sanial2001
0
73
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,777
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1735709/Python-%2B-Easy-Approach
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: obsp = -prices[0] # Old Bought State Profit ossp = 0 # Old Sell State Profit for i in range(1, len(prices)): nbsp = 0 nssp = 0 # Time to Buy... if ossp-prices[i] > obsp: nbsp = ossp-prices[i] else: nbsp = obsp # Time to Sell... if obsp+prices[i]-fee > ossp: nssp = obsp+prices[i]-fee else: nssp = ossp obsp = nbsp ossp = nssp return ossp
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python] + Easy Approach βœ”
leet_satyam
0
93
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,778
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1601380/Python3-One-pass-solution
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices, fee): if len(prices) < 2: return 0 res = 0 buy = prices[0] for i in range(1, len(prices)): if prices[i] < buy: buy = prices[i] elif prices[i] - buy > fee: res += prices[i] - buy - fee buy = prices[i] - fee # we pay the commission as if once return res
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] One pass solution
maosipov11
0
36
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,779
https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee/discuss/1475941/Python3-or-Recursion%2BMemoization
class Solution: def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int: self.dp=[[-1 for i in range(2)] for i in range(50001)] return self.dfs(0,0,prices,fee) def dfs(self,day,own,prices,fee): if day==len(prices): return 0 if self.dp[day][own]!=-1: return self.dp[day][own] if own: p1=prices[day]-fee+self.dfs(day+1,not own,prices,fee) p2=self.dfs(day+1,own,prices,fee) self.dp[day][own]=max(p1,p2) else: p1=-(prices[day])+self.dfs(day+1,not own,prices,fee) #here we are sending(not own) bcoz own is 0 p2=self.dfs(day+1,own,prices,fee)# here we are sending(own) bcoz own is 0 self.dp[day][own]=max(p1,p2) return self.dp[day][own]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-with-transaction-fee
[Python3] | Recursion+Memoization
swapnilsingh421
0
75
best time to buy and sell stock with transaction fee
714
0.644
Medium
11,780
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/2012976/Python-Clean-and-Simple!
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits): i, n, numBits = 0, len(bits), 0 while i < n: bit = bits[i] if bit == 1: i += 2 numBits = 2 else: i += 1 numBits = 1 return numBits == 1
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Python - Clean and Simple!
domthedeveloper
2
146
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,781
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1049624/optimal-solution-for-python
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: i=0 count=0 while i<len(bits): if bits[i]==1: count=2 i+=2 else: count=1 i+=1 return count%2
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
optimal solution for python
captain10x
1
118
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,782
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/380693/Solution-in-Python-3-(three-lines)
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, b: List[int]) -> bool: L, i = len(b)-1, 0 while i < L: i += 1 + b[i] return True if i == L else False - Junaid Mansuri (LeetCode ID)@hotmail.com
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Solution in Python 3 (three lines)
junaidmansuri
1
354
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,783
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/2802345/It's-that-easy-oror-Simplest-solution
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: idx =0 flag = True while(idx<len(bits)): if(bits[idx]==0): idx+=1 flag =True else: idx+=2 flag = False return flag
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
It's that easy || Simplest solution
hasan2599
0
3
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,784
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/2774562/Python-one-liner-99.57-BUT-I-DON'T-KNOW-WHY!
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: return '1' not in ''.join([str(bit) for bit in bits[:-1]]).replace('11', '').replace('10', '')
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Python one liner 99.57% BUT I DON'T KNOW WHY!
Kros-ZERO
0
6
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,785
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/2535185/Python-Clear-iterative-solution
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: # go through the array was_one = False for num in bits[:-1]: if was_one: was_one = False continue if num: was_one = True return not was_one
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
[Python] - Clear iterative solution
Lucew
0
39
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,786
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1883540/Python-3-oror-4-lines-oror-O(n)O(1)
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: i, n = 0, len(bits) while i < n - 1: i += bits[i] + 1 return i == n - 1
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Python 3 || 4 lines || O(n)/O(1)
dereky4
0
81
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,787
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1831009/4-Lines-Python-Solution-oror-30-Faster-oror-Memory-less-than-60
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: while len(bits)>2: if bits[0]==0: bits=bits[1:] ; continue else: bits=bits[2:] return bits in [[0],[0,0]]
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
4-Lines Python Solution || 30% Faster || Memory less than 60%
Taha-C
0
52
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,788
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1831009/4-Lines-Python-Solution-oror-30-Faster-oror-Memory-less-than-60
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: return reduce(lambda x, y: not y if x else True, bits[:-1], True)
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
4-Lines Python Solution || 30% Faster || Memory less than 60%
Taha-C
0
52
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,789
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1784010/Python3-greedy
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: i = 0 while i < len(bits)-1: if bits[i] == 0: i += 1 else: i += 2 return i == len(bits)-1
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
[Python3] greedy
ye15
0
57
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,790
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1271599/python-solution(faster-than-64.8-and-memory-less-than-97.5)
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, b: List[int]) -> bool: n=len(b) if n==1: return True if n==2: if b[0]==0: return True else: return False for i in range(n-2): if b[i]==1: b[i]=5 b[i+1]=5 b=list(filter(lambda x: x!=5,b)) t=len(b) if t==1: return True elif t==0: return False elif t>=2: if 1 not in b: return True else: return False
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
python solution(faster than 64.8% and memory less than 97.5%)
sakshigoel123
0
124
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,791
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/520118/easy-python-solution
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: i = 0 while i < len(bits)-1: if bits[i] == 1: i+=1 i+=1 return i == len(bits)-1
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
easy python solution
Jahr
0
96
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,792
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/463038/Get-desired-result-base-on-conditions
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: n = len(bits) if n == 1: return True if n == 2: return bits[0] == 0 if bits[n - 2] == 0: return True if bits[n - 3] == 0: return False idx = n - 4 while idx >= 0 and bits[idx] == 1: idx -= 1 return (n - 3 - idx + 1) % 2 == 0
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Get desired result base on conditions
tp99
0
46
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,793
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/333086/Python-solution-using-stack-(straight-forward)
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: stack=[] for i in bits: if i==1: if not stack:stack.append(i) elif stack[-1]==1:stack.pop() elif stack[-1]==0: stack.pop() stack.append(i) else: if not stack:stack.append(i) elif stack[-1]==1:stack.pop() if not stack: return False return True
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Python solution using stack (straight forward)
ketan35
0
68
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,794
https://leetcode.com/problems/1-bit-and-2-bit-characters/discuss/1234319/Python3-simple-solution-using-while-loop
class Solution: def isOneBitCharacter(self, bits: List[int]) -> bool: i = 0 while i in range(len(bits)): if i == len(bits)-1: return True if bits[i] == 0: i += 1 else: i += 2 return False
1-bit-and-2-bit-characters
Python3 simple solution using while loop
EklavyaJoshi
-2
75
1 bit and 2 bit characters
717
0.46
Easy
11,795
https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray/discuss/2599501/LeetCode-The-Hard-Way-Explained-Line-By-Line
class Solution: # DP Approach - Similar to 1143. Longest Common Subsequence def findLength(self, nums1: List[int], nums2: List[int]) -> int: n, m = len(nums1), len(nums2) # dp[i][j] means the length of repeated subarray of nums1[:i] and nums2[:j] dp = [[0] * (m + 1) for _ in range(n + 1)] ans = 0 for i in range(1, n + 1): for j in range(1, m + 1): # if both character is same if nums1[i - 1] == nums2[j - 1]: # then we add 1 to the previous state, which is dp[i - 1][j - 1] # in other word, we extend the repeated subarray by 1 # e.g. a = [1], b = [1], length of repeated array is 1 # a = [1,2], b = [1,2], length of repeated array is the previous result + 1 = 2 dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j - 1] + 1 # record the max ans here ans = max(ans, dp[i][j]) # else: # if you are looking for longest common sequence, # then you put dp[i][j] = max(dp[i - 1][j], dp[i][j - 1]); here # however, this problem is looking for subarray, # since both character is not equal, which means we need to break it here # hence, set dp[i][j] to 0 return ans
maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray
πŸ”₯ [LeetCode The Hard Way] πŸ”₯ Explained Line By Line
wingkwong
32
2,000
maximum length of repeated subarray
718
0.515
Medium
11,796
https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray/discuss/2599501/LeetCode-The-Hard-Way-Explained-Line-By-Line
class Solution: # Binary Search Approach def findLength(self, nums1: List[int], nums2: List[int]) -> int: N, M = len(nums1), len(nums2) def ok(k): # the idea is to use binary search to find the length `k` # then we check if there is any nums1[i : i + k] == nums2[i : i + k] s = set(tuple(nums1[i : i + k]) for i in range(N - k + 1)) return any(tuple(nums2[i : i + k]) in s for i in range(M - k + 1)) # init possible boundary l, r = 0, min(N, M) while l < r: # get the middle one # for even number of elements, take the upper one m = (l + r + 1) // 2 if ok(m): # include m l = m else: # exclude m r = m - 1 return l
maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray
πŸ”₯ [LeetCode The Hard Way] πŸ”₯ Explained Line By Line
wingkwong
32
2,000
maximum length of repeated subarray
718
0.515
Medium
11,797
https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray/discuss/2599253/Python3-Runtime%3A-178-ms-faster-than-99.92-or-Memory%3A-13.8-MB-less-than-99.81
class Solution: def findLength(self, nums1: List[int], nums2: List[int]) -> int: strnum2 = ''.join([chr(x) for x in nums2]) strmax = '' ans = 0 for num in nums1: strmax += chr(num) if strmax in strnum2: ans = max(ans,len(strmax)) else: strmax = strmax[1:] return ans
maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray
[Python3] Runtime: 178 ms, faster than 99.92% | Memory: 13.8 MB, less than 99.81%
anubhabishere
30
2,300
maximum length of repeated subarray
718
0.515
Medium
11,798
https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray/discuss/1324567/well-explained-oror-With-and-Without-DP-oror-99.66-faster-oror-Easily-Understandable
class Solution: def findLength(self, nums1: List[int], nums2: List[int]) -> int: nums2_str = ''.join([chr(x) for x in nums2]) max_str = '' res = 0 for num in nums1: max_str+=chr(num) if max_str in nums2_str: res = max(res,len(max_str)) else: max_str = max_str[1:] return res
maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray
πŸ“Œ well-explained || [ With and Without DP ] || 99.66 % faster || Easily-Understandable 🐍
abhi9Rai
10
994
maximum length of repeated subarray
718
0.515
Medium
11,799