post_href
stringlengths
57
213
python_solutions
stringlengths
71
22.3k
slug
stringlengths
3
77
post_title
stringlengths
1
100
user
stringlengths
3
29
upvotes
int64
-20
1.2k
views
int64
0
60.9k
problem_title
stringlengths
3
77
number
int64
1
2.48k
acceptance
float64
0.14
0.91
difficulty
stringclasses
3 values
__index_level_0__
int64
0
34k
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2812987/Python-Solution-using-Try-and-Except
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: num_sort=sorted(set(nums),reverse=True) try: return num_sort[2] except: return num_sort[0]
third-maximum-number
Python Solution using Try and Except
suyog_097
0
2
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,300
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2811850/Python-Elegant-Solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: s = set(nums) l = list(s) if len(l)<3: return max(l) return sorted(l)[-3]
third-maximum-number
Python Elegant Solution
trickycat10
0
2
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,301
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2807403/solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums.sort() l = len(nums)-1 for i in range(len(nums)-1,-1,-1): if len(nums)==1: break if nums[l] == nums[l-1]: nums.pop(i) l-=1 else: ...
third-maximum-number
solution
khanismail_1
0
2
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,302
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2805729/Easy-solution-in-python-beats-99.1
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: maxi_1=-9999 maxi_2=-9999 maxi_3=-2147483648 l=list(set(nums)) if len(l)>=3: for i in l: if i>maxi_1: maxi_1=i l.remove(maxi_1) for i ...
third-maximum-number
Easy solution in python beats 99.1%
kmpravin5
0
3
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,303
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2803385/python-solution-easy-to-understand
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: distinctnums = [] currentnum = None nums.sort(reverse = True) for i in nums: if i != currentnum: distinctnums.append(i) currentnum = i try: return distinctnums[...
third-maximum-number
python solution easy to understand
muge_zhang
0
4
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,304
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2781240/python3-userfriendly-code
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums=set(nums) nums=list(nums) nums.sort() if len(nums)>2: return nums[-3] else: return nums[-1]
third-maximum-number
python3 userfriendly code
s_ahith-
0
2
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,305
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2778590/Python-Fastest-Solution-100-Runtime
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: first = second = third = None for num in nums: if(num in [first, second, third]): continue if(first is None or num > first): third = second second = first ...
third-maximum-number
Python Fastest Solution 100% Runtime
darsigangothri0698
0
3
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,306
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2752714/Python-1-line-code
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: return [sorted(set(nums))[-x] for x in range(1,len(set(nums))+1) if len(set(nums))<3 or x==3][0]
third-maximum-number
Python 1 line code
kumar_anand05
0
4
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,307
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2743283/A-little-cheaty-but-it's-O(n)-time-and-O(1)-space-in-Python3
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: maxes = [-inf] * 3 for x in nums: if x > maxes[0] and x != maxes[1] and x != maxes[2]: maxes[0] = x maxes.sort() if maxes[0] != -inf: return maxes[0] ...
third-maximum-number
A little cheaty, but it's O(n) time and O(1) space in Python3
ThatTallProgrammer
0
4
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,308
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2738617/Simple-Python-Solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: list1 = sorted(set(nums)) if len(list1)>=3: b = list1[-3] return b else: c = list1[-1] return c
third-maximum-number
Simple Python Solution
dnvavinash
0
9
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,309
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2736611/third-maximum-number-py3
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: if len(nums) < 3 : return max(nums) mapp = {} for val in nums : mapp[val] = 1+mapp.get(val , 0 ) if len(mapp) <= 2 : return max(nums) nums = [i for i in nums if i!=max(nums...
third-maximum-number
third-maximum-number-py3
Akshpreet
0
3
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,310
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2729741/Easy-and-Simple-Python-Solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: unique = list(set(nums)) unique.sort() return unique[-3] if len(unique) >= 3 else max(nums)
third-maximum-number
Easy and Simple Python Solution
dayaniravi123
0
3
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,311
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2722394/easy-solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: m1=max(nums) l1=list(set(nums)) if len(l1)<3: return m1 l1.remove(m1) m2=max(l1) l1.remove(m2) m3=max(l1) return m3
third-maximum-number
easy solution
sindhu_300
0
3
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,312
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2685839/easiest-python-solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums=set(nums) if len(nums)<3: return max(nums) nums.remove(max(nums)) nums.remove(max(nums)) return max(nums)
third-maximum-number
easiest python solution
sahityasetu1996
0
1
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,313
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2674129/Approach-using-MaxHeap-and-Set-with-Comments.
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums = set(nums) if len(nums) < 3: return max(nums) else: max_heap = [] for i in nums: heapq.heappush(max_heap,-i) #Add value to heap. Since it is natively a min heap, adding a neg...
third-maximum-number
Approach using MaxHeap and Set with Comments.
mephiticfire
0
2
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,314
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2641071/Python-Solution-or-Brute-Force
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums.sort() # print(nums) d={} ans=[] for num in nums: if num not in d: d[num]=1 ans.append(num) if len(ans)>2: return ans[-3] return a...
third-maximum-number
Python Solution | Brute Force
Siddharth_singh
0
5
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,315
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2616428/oror-python-solution-oror
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums=sorted(set(nums), reverse=True) l=len(nums) if l>=3: return nums[2] else: return max(nums)
third-maximum-number
|| python solution ||
Shreya_sg_283
0
15
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,316
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2460128/PYTHON-Simple-Straightforward-Solution-Feedbacks-are-appreciated
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: array = sorted(list(set(nums)), reverse=True) return array[2] if len(array)>2 else max(nums)
third-maximum-number
[PYTHON] Simple Straightforward Solution - Feedbacks are appreciated
Eli47
0
54
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,317
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2398317/Solution-in-Python-O(nlog(n))-beats-97.95
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: ram = list(set(nums)) if len(ram)>=3: ram.sort(reverse=True) return ram[2] else: return max(ram)
third-maximum-number
Solution in Python O(nlog(n)) beats 97.95%
YangJenHao
0
93
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,318
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2343130/Python3-Easy-Bucket-sort-O(n)
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: minVal = float("-inf") f, s, t = [minVal, minVal, minVal] for num in nums: if num == f or num == s or num == t: continue if num > f: t = s s = f ...
third-maximum-number
Python3 Easy Bucket sort O(n)
neth_37
0
57
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,319
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2307460/python3-Easiest-solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: nums = set(nums) if len(nums) < 3: return max(nums) nums = list(nums) nums.remove(max(nums)) nums.remove(max(nums)) return max(nums)
third-maximum-number
python3 Easiest solution
Harshit_twist
0
34
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,320
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2147943/Python-Solution-oror-simple-and-clean-code
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: l=[] for i in nums: if i not in l: l.append(i) l.sort() print(l) n=len(l) if n<=2: return max(l) else: return l[len(l)-3]
third-maximum-number
Python Solution || simple and clean code
T1n1_B0x1
0
62
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,321
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/2134004/python-min-heap-solution
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: heap = [] for i in set(nums): if len(heap) < 3: heapq.heappush(heap, i) else: heapq.heappushpop(heap, i) return heap[0] if len(heap) == 3 else max(heap)
third-maximum-number
python min-heap solution
writemeom
0
50
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,322
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1969173/Python-3-Solution-Using-Set-and-Sorted
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: if len(sorted(list(set(nums)))) < 3: return max(nums) return sorted(list(set(nums)))[-3]
third-maximum-number
Python 3 Solution Using Set and Sorted
AprDev2011
0
53
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,323
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1930488/Python-One-Liner-or-Multiple-Solutions-or-Clean-and-Simple!
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums): nums = sorted(set(nums), reverse=True) return nums[2] if len(nums) >= 3 else nums[0]
third-maximum-number
Python - One Liner | Multiple Solutions | Clean and Simple!
domthedeveloper
0
120
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,324
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1930488/Python-One-Liner-or-Multiple-Solutions-or-Clean-and-Simple!
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums): return (lambda n : n[2] if len(n) >= 3 else n[0])(sorted(set(nums), reverse=True))
third-maximum-number
Python - One Liner | Multiple Solutions | Clean and Simple!
domthedeveloper
0
120
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,325
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1930488/Python-One-Liner-or-Multiple-Solutions-or-Clean-and-Simple!
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums): m = [None, None, None] for n in set(nums): if m[0] is None or n > m[0]: m = [n, m[0], m[1]] elif m[1] is None or n > m[1]: m = [m[0], n, m[1]] elif m[2] is None or n > m[2]: m = [m[0], m[1], n] ...
third-maximum-number
Python - One Liner | Multiple Solutions | Clean and Simple!
domthedeveloper
0
120
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,326
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1930488/Python-One-Liner-or-Multiple-Solutions-or-Clean-and-Simple!
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums): m = [-inf, -inf, -inf] for n in set(nums): if n > m[0]: m = [n, m[0], m[1]] elif n > m[1]: m = [m[0], n, m[1]] elif n > m[2]: m = [m[0], m[1], n] return m[2] if m[2] != -inf else m[0]
third-maximum-number
Python - One Liner | Multiple Solutions | Clean and Simple!
domthedeveloper
0
120
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,327
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1927629/Third-Maximum-Number
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: # first we take the lenght of arr lenght = len(nums) # then we check that lenght is equal to 1 or not if (lenght == 1): return (nums[0]) # then we sort the arr in decending oder arr = s...
third-maximum-number
Third Maximum Number
shubham_pcs2012
0
43
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,328
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1925091/Python-Easy-to-understand
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: firstmax = max(nums) if len(nums)<3: return firstmax else: secondmax = -9999999999999999999999 for a in nums: if secondmax < a and a != firstmax: secondmax = a ...
third-maximum-number
Python Easy to understand
Tonmoy-saha18
0
29
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,329
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1853059/Python-(Simple-Approach-and-Beginner-friendly)
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: maxi = [] count = 0 nums.sort(reverse = True) for i in nums: if i not in maxi and count<3: maxi.append(i) count+=1 if i in maxi: continue return...
third-maximum-number
Python (Simple Approach and Beginner-friendly)
vishvavariya
0
90
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,330
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1840412/Easy-Py3-sol
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: n=len(nums) if n<3: return max(nums) a=b=c=min(nums) for i in nums: if i>a: c=b b=a a=i if i<a and i>b: c=b ...
third-maximum-number
Easy Py3 sol
Xhubham
0
43
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,331
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1653355/Python-Using-Heapq-Explained
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: # Initialize the priority queue heap = [] for num in nums: heapq.heappush(heap, -num) seen, maxes = set(), 1 # Remember the first max of the list finalMax = -heapq.heappop(heap) heapq.heappush(heap, -...
third-maximum-number
Python Using Heapq - Explained
TheGreatMuffinMan
0
145
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,332
https://leetcode.com/problems/third-maximum-number/discuss/1382246/Python3-Simple-Solution-Faster-Than-100-with-Comments
class Solution: def thirdMax(self, nums: List[int]) -> int: # Remove redundant element nums = set(nums) # Convert it back to list to use sort nums = list(nums) # Sort the list nums.sort() # Return the third one from the last...
third-maximum-number
Python3 Simple Solution Faster Than 100% with Comments
Hejita
0
155
third maximum number
414
0.326
Easy
7,333
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1591891/Python-Straightforward-Solution-or-Easy-to-Understand
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: num1 = list(num1) num2 = list(num2) car = 0 res = "" while num1 or num2 or car: if num1: car += int(num1.pop()) if num2: car += int(num2.pop()) res += str((car % 10)) car //= 10 return res[::-1]
add-strings
Python Straightforward Solution | Easy to Understand
leet_satyam
10
605
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,334
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1330543/Simple-Python-Solution-for-%22Add-Strings%22
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: def func(n): value = {'0':0, '1':1, '2':2, '3':3, '4':4, '5':5, '6':6, '7':7, '8':8, '9':9} result = 0 for digit in n: result = 10 * result + value[digit] return result ...
add-strings
Simple Python Solution for "Add Strings"
sakshikhandare2527
4
364
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,335
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1268970/Python-solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: s = {str(i):i for i in range(10)} def helper(num: str, ret: int = 0) -> int: for ch in num: ret = ret * 10 + s[ch] return ret return str(helper(num1) + helper(num2))
add-strings
Python solution
5tigerjelly
4
732
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,336
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2118139/Python-without-int()-using-string-as-keys-in-dictionary
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: NUMBERS = {"0": 0, "1": 1, "2": 2, "3": 3, "4": 4, "5": 5, "6": 6, "7": 7, "8": 8, "9": 9} def make_integer(num): num_integer = 0 num_length = len(num) - 1 for digit in num: ...
add-strings
Python without int(), using string as keys in dictionary
cosinushh
3
289
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,337
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1760735/Easy-Python-without-int()
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: def numToStr(s): n=0 for i in s: n=n*10+ord(i)-ord('0') return n n,m=numToStr(num1),numToStr(num2) return str(m+n)
add-strings
Easy Python without int()
adityabaner
3
372
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,338
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1448713/Python3Python-Simple-solution-w-comments
class Solution: def addStrings(self, a: str, b: str) -> str: n = len(a) m = len(b) val = "" carry = 0 # Loop till all elements are exhausted while n or m: # Assign carry to num num = carry ...
add-strings
[Python3/Python] Simple solution w/ comments
ssshukla26
2
283
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,339
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2408670/Long-code-but-easy-to-understand-and-good-for-interview
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: if len(num1)<len(num2): return self.addStrings(num2,num1) n=len(num1)-1 m=len(num2)-1 num1=[i for i in num1] num2=[i for i in num2] flag=0 while m>=0: temp= int(num1[n])+int(num2[m])+flag if temp>9: ...
add-strings
Long code but easy to understand and good for interview
prateekgoel7248
1
87
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,340
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1458265/Simple-Python-O(n)-carry-digit-solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: p1, p2 = len(num1)-1, len(num2)-1 ret = [] carry = 0 while p1 >= 0 or p2 >= 0 or carry: d1 = int(num1[p1]) if p1 >= 0 else 0 d2 = int(num2[p2]) if p2 >= 0 else 0 sum = d1+d2+carry ...
add-strings
Simple Python O(n) carry digit solution
Charlesl0129
1
303
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,341
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1403833/python3-Simply-Addition-in-primary-School
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: num1 = num1[::-1] num2 = num2[::-1] carry = i = 0 num3 = '' l1 = len(num1) l2 = len(num2) l3 = max(l1,l2) while i < l3 or carry: d1 = int(num1[i]) if i < l1 else 0 d2 = int(num2[i]) if i < l2 else 0 d3 = (d1 + d2 + carry) % 10...
add-strings
python3 Simply Addition in primary School
yjin232
1
202
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,342
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1227070/Python3-simple-solution-without-using-int()-function
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: n, m = len(num1), len(num2) if n < m: num1 = (m-n)*'0' + num1 if m < n: num2 = (n-m)*'0' + num2 res = 0 n = len(num1) c = 0 for i,j in zip(num1, num2): res +...
add-strings
Python3 simple solution without using int() function
EklavyaJoshi
1
208
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,343
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/762749/Python-Recursive-solution-with-HashMap-(ONLY-STRINGS)
class Solution: addMap = {str(n):{str(i) : str(n+i) for i in range(10)} for n in range(10)} def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: if num1 == '0' or not num1: return num2 if num2 == '0' or not num2: return num1 carry,temp = '0', '' minN = min(l...
add-strings
Python Recursive solution with HashMap (ONLY STRINGS)
amrmahmoud96
1
312
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,344
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/598345/Faster-than-75-solution-Python-Clear
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: res1,res2= 0,0 for i in num1 : res1 = res1*10 + (ord(i) - ord('0')) for i in num2 : res2 = res2*10 + (ord(i) - ord('0')) return str(res1+res2)
add-strings
Faster than 75 % solution Python Clear
vichu006
1
268
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,345
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/581756/Python3-solution-using-basic-addition-and-backwards-iteration
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: result = "" carry = 0 num1_pointer = len(num1) - 1 num2_pointer = len(num2) - 1 while num1_pointer >= 0 or num2_pointer >= 0: digit1 = 0 digit2 = 0 if num1_pointer >= 0: ...
add-strings
Python3 solution using basic addition and backwards iteration
scandinavian_swimmer
1
222
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,346
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/558204/Python3-calculate-digits-one-by-one
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: """Add two numbers represented as strings""" ans = [None]*(m:=max(len(num1), len(num2))) carry = 0 for i in range(m): if i < len(num1): carry += ord(num1[~i]) - 48 if i < len(num2): carry += o...
add-strings
[Python3] calculate digits one-by-one
ye15
1
172
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,347
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/558204/Python3-calculate-digits-one-by-one
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: ans = [] i = carry = 0 while i < len(num1) or i < len(num2) or carry: if i < len(num1): carry += ord(num1[~i])-48 if i < len(num2): carry += ord(num2[~i])-48 carry, v = divmod(carry, 10) ...
add-strings
[Python3] calculate digits one-by-one
ye15
1
172
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,348
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/530632/Really-easy-to-understand-python-solution-using-zfill
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: max_len = max(len(num1), len(num2)) #so that you always get 0 even if one str is longer than other num1 = num1.zfill(max_len) num2 = num2.zfill(max_len) result = [] carry = 0 for i in ...
add-strings
Really easy to understand python solution using zfill
user2320I
1
251
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,349
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2843159/Pythonic-solution-with-respect-to-all-the-constraints-provided
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: dic = {"0":0, "1":1, "2":2, "3":3, "4":4, "5":5, "6":6, "7":7, "8":8, "9":9} car = 0 if len(num1)>len(num2): num2 = "0"*(len(num1)-len(num2)) + num2 elif len(num1)<len(num2): num1 = "0"*(len(nu...
add-strings
Pythonic solution with respect to all the constraints provided
AkashwithTech
0
4
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,350
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2842299/python-one-line-(Beats-98-Memory-13.8-MB-Beats-99.31)
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: return str(int(num1) + int(num2));
add-strings
python one line (Beats 98% Memory 13.8 MB Beats 99.31%)
seifsoliman
0
5
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,351
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2833683/Python-1-liner-no-str()-and-int()
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: return '%s'%sum([sum([elem*(10**ind) for ind, elem in enumerate([ord(i)-48 for i in l][::-1])]) for l in (num1, num2)])
add-strings
Python 1-liner, no str() and int()
nguyentuduck
0
3
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,352
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2826985/Iterate-from-the-end-of-the-two-strings-Python3
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: out = "" # Set the two strings to same size length = max(len(num1), len(num2)) num1 = num1.zfill(length) num2 = num2.zfill(length) # Start from the end of the string index = -1 # Ind...
add-strings
Iterate from the end of the two strings [Python3]
rere-rere
0
3
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,353
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2812644/LeetCode-String-Problem
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1:str, num2:str) -> str: #ord #1 - 49 #2 - 50 #return str(int(num1) + int(num2)) N, M = len(num1), len(num2) a,b = N-1,M-1 carry = 0 output = '' while a>=0 or b>=0:...
add-strings
LeetCode String Problem
ashwinpertigu
0
2
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,354
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2800367/Python-oror-simplest-solution-ever.
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: return str(self.calculateSum(num1) + self.calculateSum(num2)) def calculateSum(self, num: str) -> int: ans = 0 factor = 1 end = len(num) - 1 while end >= 0: ans += int(num[end]) * factor ...
add-strings
Python || simplest solution ever.
ahmedsamara
0
5
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,355
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2781364/python-without-int()-function
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: ans = "" size1, size2 = len(num1) - 1, len(num2) - 1 vals = 0 while size1>=0 or size2>=0 or vals: if size1>=0: vals += ord(num1[size1])-48 size1 -= 1 ...
add-strings
python without int() function
game50914
0
3
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,356
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2774968/Clean-Readable-Python-Solution-(Beats-8080)
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: offset = 0 total = 0 result = '' len_1 = len(num1) - 1 len_2 = len(num2) - 1 while offset <= len_1 or offset <= len_2 or total: if offset <= len_1: total += int(num1[len_1 ...
add-strings
Clean Readable Python Solution (Beats 80%/80%)
trietostopme
0
4
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,357
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2742862/1-line-very-fast-code-python3
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: return str(int(num1)+ int(num2))
add-strings
1 line very fast code python3
genaral-kg
0
7
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,358
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2738632/Simple-Python-Solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: b = int(num1) c = int(num2) d = b + c e = str(d) return e
add-strings
Simple Python Solution
dnvavinash
0
3
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,359
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2737326/Python-23-Lines
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: num_1 = int(num1) num_2 = int(num2) return str(num_1 + num_2)
add-strings
Python 2/3 Lines
lucasschnee
0
9
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,360
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2733599/Simple-3-lines-of-code-in-Python
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: n1 = int(''.join(num1)) #converting num1 to integer n2 = int(''.join(num2)) # converting num2 to integer summ = n1 + n2 # adding num1 and num2 after converting them to integer return f"{summ}" #retur...
add-strings
🤩 Simple 3 lines of code in Python 😎
mohitdubey1024
0
5
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,361
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2728954/Beats-86.83-Runtime-Beats-59.91-Memory
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: n1 = len(num1) - 1 n2 = len(num2) - 1 carry = 0 ans = '' while n1 >= 0 or n2 >= 0 or carry > 0: n1_digit = int(num1[n1]) if n1 >= 0 else 0 n2_digit = int(num2[n2]) if n2 >= 0 else 0 ...
add-strings
Beats 86.83% Runtime; Beats 59.91% Memory
yaha12
0
7
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,362
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2711947/Python-Easy-to-understand-solution-with-String-manipulation-with-Explaination
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: if len(num1)<len(num2): num1, num2 = num2, num1 l1 = list(num1) l2 = list(num2) if len(l1)!=len(l2): l2 = ['0']*(len(l1)-len(l2))+l2 output = [] carry = 0 for i in range(len(num1)-1,-1,-1): ...
add-strings
Python Easy to understand solution with String manipulation with Explaination
abrarjahin
0
11
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,363
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2710016/single-line-code
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: return str(int(num1)+int(num2))
add-strings
single line code
sindhu_300
0
8
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,364
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2682339/Python-Simple-Sol.-Faster-then-80
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: def helper(str): i=0 for s in str: i = (i*10) + ord(s) - ord('0') return i return str(helper(num1) + helper(num2))
add-strings
Python Simple Sol. Faster then 80%
pranjalmishra334
0
32
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,365
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2682190/Python-Solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: n = int(num1) + int(num2) return str(n)
add-strings
Python Solution
Sheeza
0
5
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,366
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2655862/O(n.m)-creating-the-set-of-sums
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: total=sum(nums) if total%2==1: return False targetSum=total/2 subset_sum_set=set([0]) for n in nums: if targetSum-n in subset_sum_set: return True templist=[n+...
add-strings
O(n.m) - creating the set of sums
ConfusedMoe
0
1
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,367
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2651658/Python-solution-without-using-ord
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: # To adhere to the problem's constraints, we should probably hardcode this! tables_of_addition = {str(x): {str(i): str(x+i) for i in range(10)} for x in range(0, 10)} # Corner case for i in range(10, 20): tables_of_ad...
add-strings
Python solution without using ord
amegahed
0
34
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,368
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2516445/Python-Easy-To-Understand-Solution-for-Beginners
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: def str2Num(num): numDict = { '0':0, '1':1, '2':2, '3':3, '4':4, '5':5, '6':6, '7':7, ...
add-strings
Python Easy To Understand Solution for Beginners
Ron99
0
108
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,369
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2479590/Python-or-easy-solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: max_len = max(len(num1), len(num2)) # find maxumum length to feel the smallest with leading zero's num1 = num1.zfill(max_len) num2 = num2.zfill(max_len) res = '' leftover = 0 ...
add-strings
Python | easy solution
Yauhenish
0
76
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,370
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2461638/Is-using-hashmap-acceptable-during-interview
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: hashmap = {'1':1, '2':2, '3':3, '4':4, '5':5, '6':6, '7':7, '8':8, '9':9, '0':0} if len(num1)<len(num2): temp = num1 num1 = num2 num2 = temp #Always make num1 longer, for easier computation...
add-strings
Is using hashmap acceptable during interview?
Arana
0
63
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,371
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2335118/Python-93.12-faster-or-Simplest-solution-with-explanation-or-Beg-to-Adv-or-Math
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: s1,s2=int(num1), int(num2) # as the provided numbers are string we cant add them, so first we are making them as int to perform addition. total = s1+s2 # adding 2 number. We cant add 2 numbers if their type is str using +, as it wil...
add-strings
Python 93.12% faster | Simplest solution with explanation | Beg to Adv | Math
rlakshay14
0
129
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,372
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/2335118/Python-93.12-faster-or-Simplest-solution-with-explanation-or-Beg-to-Adv-or-Math
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: return str(int(num1)+int(num2)) # doing the same as in the above solution just in one line.
add-strings
Python 93.12% faster | Simplest solution with explanation | Beg to Adv | Math
rlakshay14
0
129
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,373
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1760414/Python-oror-Memory-Less-than-99.91-oror-Dictionaries
class Solution: def change(converter,string): num = 0 for i in string: num = num*10 + converter[i] return num def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: converter = {'0':0,'1':1,'2':2,'3':3,'4':4,'5':5,'6':6,'7':7,'8':8,'9':9} ...
add-strings
Python || Memory Less than 99.91% || Dictionaries
Akhilesh_Pothuri
0
96
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,374
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1703409/Python3-easy-understand-solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: s1, s2 = 0, 0 for i in num1: s1 = s1*10 + int(i) for i in num2: s2 = s2*10 + int(i) res = str(s1 + s2) return res
add-strings
Python3 easy understand solution
TikaCrota
0
251
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,375
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1638744/Separate-carry-and-addition-maybe-easier-to-implement-and-understand
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: def dig(c): return ord(c) - ord('0') n1 = len(num1) n2 = len(num2) res = [0]*(max(n1, n2) + 1) p1 = n1 - 1 p2 = n2 - 1 p = len(res) - 1 while p1 >= 0 or p2...
add-strings
Separate carry and addition - maybe easier to implement and understand
hl2425
0
108
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,376
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1538987/Python
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: res = "" i = len(num1) - 1 j = len(num2) - 1 flag = 0 while i >=0 or j >= 0: a = int(num1[i]) if i >=0 else 0 i = i - 1 b = int(num2[j]) if j >=0 else 0 j = j - ...
add-strings
Python
siyu14
0
187
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,377
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1538987/Python
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: sum1 = 0 sum2 = 0 length1 = len(num1) - 1 length2 = len(num2) - 1 for i in range(len(num1)): digit = ord(num1[i]) - ord('0') sum1 += digit * pow(10, length1) length1 -= 1 ...
add-strings
Python
siyu14
0
187
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,378
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1452830/Python3-Simple-clean-and-easy-solution-O(N)
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: i, j, carry = len(num1)-1, len(num2)-1, 0 res = [] while i >= 0 or j >= 0 or carry > 0: n1 = 0 n2 = 0 if i >= 0: n1 = int(num1[i]) i -= 1 if j >=...
add-strings
[Python3] Simple clean and easy solution O(N)
sshaplygin
0
322
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,379
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1324890/python-solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: #각 부족한 자릿수 만큼 0으로 채우기 if len(num1) > len(num2): num2 = '0' * (len(num1) - len(num2)) + num2 if len(num2) > len(num1): num1 = '0' * (len(num2) - len(num1)) + num1 result = '' ...
add-strings
python solution
koreahong2
0
98
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,380
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1263469/Python-dollarolution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: c, u = 0, '' if len(num1) > len(num2): temp = num1 num1 = num2 num2 = temp for i in range(1, len(num2)+1): if i <= len(num1): j = str(int(num1[-i])+int(num2[-i])...
add-strings
Python $olution
AakRay
0
226
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,381
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1260818/Python3-straight-forward-solution
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: n1,n2=0,0 for i in num1: n1 = n1*10 + ord(i)-48 for i in num2: n2 = n2*10 + ord(i)-48 return str(n1+n2)
add-strings
Python3 straight forward solution
Sanyamx1x
0
133
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,382
https://leetcode.com/problems/add-strings/discuss/1223725/python-3-or-Self-defined-str-type
class Solution: def addStrings(self, num1: str, num2: str) -> str: if "0" in (num1, num2): return num2 if num1 == "0" else num1 class MyStr(str): dic = {str(v): v for v in range(10)} def __getitem__(self, index): try: ...
add-strings
python 3 | Self-defined str type
mousun224
0
187
add strings
415
0.526
Easy
7,383
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: if sum(nums)%2: # or if sum(nums)&amp;1 return False # main logic here
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,384
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: s = sum(nums) if s&amp;1: return False """ The dp array stores the total obtained sums we have come across so far. Notice that dp[0] = True; if we never select any element, the total sum is 0. ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,385
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: s = sum(nums) if s&amp;1: return False dp = [True]+[False]*(s>>1) for num in nums: for curr in range(s>>1, num-1, -1): dp[curr] = dp[curr] or dp[curr-num] return dp[-1]
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,386
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: dp, s = set([0]), sum(nums) if s&amp;1: return False for num in nums: for curr in range(s>>1, num-1, -1): if curr not in dp and curr-num in dp: if curr == s>>1: ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,387
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: dp, s = set([0]), sum(nums) if s&amp;1: return False for num in nums: dp.update([v+num for v in dp if v+num <= s>>1]) return s>>1 in dp
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,388
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: l, s = len(nums), sum(nums) @cache # this is important to avoid unnecessary recursion def dfs(curr: int, idx: int) -> bool: """ Select elements and check if nums can be partitioned. :param c...
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,389
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624391/Python-DP-and-DFS-Solutions-Easy-to-understand-with-Explanation
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: l, s = len(nums), sum(nums) @cache def dfs(curr: int, idx: int) -> bool: return curr == s>>1 if idx == l else True if curr+nums[idx] == s>>1 or \ (curr+nums[idx] < s>>1 and dfs(curr+nums[idx], idx+1)) else dfs(curr, i...
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python] DP & DFS Solutions - Easy-to-understand with Explanation
zayne-siew
38
5,800
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,390
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/872024/Python3-Brute-Force-greater-Top-Down-greater-Bottom-Up
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: if not nums: return True n = len(nums) if sum(nums) % 2 != 0: return False target = sum(nums)//2 answer = 0 def helper(total, i): nonlocal nums, answer ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
Python3 Brute Force -> Top Down -> Bottom Up
nyc_coder
10
573
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,391
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/872024/Python3-Brute-Force-greater-Top-Down-greater-Bottom-Up
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: if not nums: return True n = len(nums) if sum(nums) % 2 != 0: return False target = sum(nums)//2 memo = {} def helper(total, i): nonlocal nums, memo ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
Python3 Brute Force -> Top Down -> Bottom Up
nyc_coder
10
573
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,392
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/872024/Python3-Brute-Force-greater-Top-Down-greater-Bottom-Up
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: if not nums: return True n = len(nums) if sum(nums) % 2 != 0: return False target = sum(nums)//2 dp = [[False for _ in range(target+1)] for _ in range(n+1)] dp[0][0] = True ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
Python3 Brute Force -> Top Down -> Bottom Up
nyc_coder
10
573
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,393
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/872024/Python3-Brute-Force-greater-Top-Down-greater-Bottom-Up
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: if not nums: return True n = len(nums) if sum(nums) % 2 != 0: return False target = sum(nums)//2 dp = [False for _ in range(target+1)] dp[0] = True for num in nums: ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
Python3 Brute Force -> Top Down -> Bottom Up
nyc_coder
10
573
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,394
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/609458/Python3-2-lines-32ms-bitset-solution-Partition-Equal-Subset-Sum
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: target, r = divmod(sum(nums), 2) return r == 0 and (reduce(lambda x, y: x << y | x, [1] + nums) >> target) &amp; 1
partition-equal-subset-sum
Python3 2 lines, 32ms, bitset solution - Partition Equal Subset Sum
r0bertz
4
895
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,395
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1632359/Recursion-%2B-memoization-in-Python-(174-ms)-beats-87.56-submission
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: def rec(idx, target): if (idx, target) in memo: return False if target == 0: return True elif target < 0 or idx == N: return False fla...
partition-equal-subset-sum
Recursion + memoization in Python (174 ms), beats 87.56% submission
kryuki
2
375
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,396
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1624420/Python3-MEMO-Explained
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: n = len(nums) s = sum(nums) if s%2: return False @cache def rec(i, one, two): if i == n: return not one and not two if one < 0 or two < ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
✔️[Python3] MEMO, Explained
artod
2
182
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,397
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/1508882/Easiest-Approach-oror-Clean-and-Concise-Code-oror-For-Beginners
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: total = sum(nums) n = len(nums) if total%2: return False dp = dict() def backtrack(ind,local): if ind>=n: return False if total-local==local: return True ...
partition-equal-subset-sum
📌📌 Easiest Approach || Clean & Concise Code || For Beginners 🐍
abhi9Rai
1
216
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,398
https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/discuss/838500/Python3-knapsack-solved-by-top-down-dp
class Solution: def canPartition(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool: if (ss := sum(nums)) &amp; 1: return False @lru_cache(None) def fn(i, v): """Return True if possible to find subarray of nums[i:] summing to v.""" if v <= 0: return v == 0 if i == l...
partition-equal-subset-sum
[Python3] knapsack solved by top-down dp
ye15
1
118
partition equal subset sum
416
0.466
Medium
7,399