text stringlengths 19 206 |
|---|
NLGrUdD5uDw-010|The atomic orbitals forming bond angle 180 can't quite do that. |
NLGrUdD5uDw-011|So forming acetylene isn't really possible. |
NLGrUdD5uDw-012|And it gets a little more complicated when I go to steric number 3. |
NLGrUdD5uDw-013|So if I have a bond angle of 120 degrees, there aren't even atomic orbitals that have 120 degree orientation to each other. |
NLGrUdD5uDw-017|So what I need are a set of atomic orbitals where I can combine them and get the various angles for the various steric numbers. |
NLGrUdD5uDw-018|And that's what we'll look at next. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-000|Let's look at the molecular orbital description of several atoms going across the periodic table. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-001|We'll go from boron to neon and form the diatomic molecules, and look at how they look in a molecular orbital description. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-002|When you start with boron, WE'LL take boron and we'll take the p orbital contributions only to the molecular orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-004|So those don't contribute to the bond order. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-005|Sigma s and sigma s star cancel each other out. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-006|So we'll just look at the p contributions to the molecular orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-008|It has a 2p electron, we can find that 2p electron, one from each boron and put it into the molecular orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-009|So two electrons in the molecular orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-010|Here's boron, the lowest energy molecular orbitals are the pi bonding orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-012|Two bonding electrons, no anti-bonding electrons, so 2 divided by 2 is 1. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-013|We can do the same thing with carbon. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-015|So I have 1p electron, or 2p electrons from each carbon for a total of four going into my molecular orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-016|And when I put in four electrons to my molecular orbitals I get a diamagnetic carbon molecule with a double bond. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-017|Four bonding electrons divided by 2, bond order two. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-019|Oxygen we would predict would be paramagnetic from this. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-020|Now as we go across the periodic table, the lower energy orbitals are going to switch here. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-021|The sigma bonding orbital becomes the lower energy as I go across the periodic table. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-022|And you might predict that these molecular orbitals are formed from linear combinations of atomic orbitals. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-023|And you have to do the mathematical calculation and calculate the energies, and you know the orbitals change as you go across the periodic table. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-024|Atomic radii decrease. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-025|So the character of the individual atomic orbital changes, and the character of the molecular orbitals that result changes. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-026|When we give these orbital configurations, and it's necessary for you to know them, we'll make it very clear which orbital designation you should use. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-027|So oxygen has two unpaired electrons, oxygen is paramagnetic. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-028|We can go ahead to fluorine for the Lewis electron dot structure for fluorine, we'd predict a single bond. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-029|Does the molecular orbital theory predict that? |
aLwZdRbk8_4-033|So what we have is our molecular orbital theory predicting neon would not form a bond. |
aLwZdRbk8_4-034|It would have a bond order zero. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-000|Let's do a calculation involving both the ideal gas law and the van der Waals expression for gases and compare the two. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-004|Well these last two we can answer right away. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-005|Which guess has more collisions per second with the walls? |
wEwYuEk6dzs-006|Well that's the gas that's moving at the greater average velocity. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-007|And the greater average velocity goes as the temperature-- but they're both at the same temperature-- or the mass. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-008|The lower the mass, the higher the average velocity. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-009|So the one with the higher rms velocity, in this case, it's helium. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-010|So helium will have more collisions with the wall. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-011|Remember, they both can have the same pressure. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-012|Just because helium is hitting the wall more often to impart its momentum, carbon dioxide hits with a bigger punch. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-013|So they both exert the same pressure on the wall. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-014|Now, what about the greater attractions? |
wEwYuEk6dzs-015|Carbon dioxide will have the greater intermolecular attractions. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-016|And we would see that reflected in the size of the A parameter in the van der Waals expression. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-017|So we can go directly to that. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-019|Now, they could be mixed or they could be in separate flasks, it doesn't matter. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-020|If they're mixed, we'll calculate a partial pressure for each. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-021|If they're separate, the partial pressure and the total pressure will be the same. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-022|If they're mixed, the total pressure will be the sum of both pressures. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-023|But either way, we can calculate the pressure for helium and carbon dioxide. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-024|So first we'll do it for a real gas situation. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-025|So we'll assume they behave like ideal gases. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-030|The ideal gas law doesn't include the nature of the particle. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-031|So both gases would have a pressure 1.63 atmospheres at 15 liters. |
wEwYuEk6dzs-033|So the ideal gas calculation is easy because we don't have to include which gas we're talking about. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-000|Let's do a calculation where we look at the standard state free energy difference for the combustion of glucose. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-001|And we'll also look at what temperature range is that reaction spontaneous. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-002|Now, it's the standard state free energy difference. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-004|How can I calculate that? |
RI6HdlWwDtw-006|So here it is. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-013|What temperature range is this reaction spontaneous for? |
RI6HdlWwDtw-014|Well, here's the chemical reaction in the free energy difference. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-015|Is it spontaneous over a broad temperature range? |
RI6HdlWwDtw-016|In order to do that, we need to know the enthalpy and the entropy. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-017|Those are relatively independent of temperature. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-018|And they tell us how delta G varies with temperature. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-019|So delta S for this reaction-- I think we can intuitively say, without doing a calculation-- delta S is greater than zero. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-020|We're producing a liquid and a gas from a solid and this gas. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-022|The enthalpy-- you may know. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-023|You've probably seen this chemical reaction, glucose burning. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-024|It is exothermic. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-025|But we don't have to use intuition for either one. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-033|As temperature increases, delta S is positive. |
RI6HdlWwDtw-034|That means the slope is negative. |
njRitLAU3Ik-007|Now, four electrons from the o orbitals will fill these molecular orbitals. |
njRitLAU3Ik-008|So we'll put those in-- one, two, three, four. |
njRitLAU3Ik-010|The Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital or LUMO is a pi-star or antibonding orbital. |
njRitLAU3Ik-011|And it's common the transitions in these conjugated systems are a pi to pi-star transition. |
njRitLAU3Ik-016|They go from a pi to pi-star. |
njRitLAU3Ik-017|So the bond order here is reduced. |
njRitLAU3Ik-019|Those are two names for the same compound. |
njRitLAU3Ik-020|This compound that's in your eye acts as a light receptor. |
njRitLAU3Ik-021|And when this transition occurs, this isomerism, that triggers a chain of chemical reactions that allow you to detect light in your eye. |
njRitLAU3Ik-022|This is actually the light recepting molecule in your eye. |
njRitLAU3Ik-023|So a pi to pi-star transition, very important in human vision. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-000|Let's balance a redox reaction. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-001|Here's a redox reaction here. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-002|And when you balance redox reactions, you should follow a series of steps, and they're outlined in many textbooks. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-003|I'll go through them right now. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-007|Well, let's go through and see which is which. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-008|So here's chromium. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-010|And that turns out to be plus 6. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-011|And the oxidation number here is obviously plus 3, so chromium is being reduced. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-012|It's oxidation number is reduced. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-013|So hopefully that means an oxidation is occurring over here. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-014|And if we analyze this using the same rules, oxygen is always minus 2, hydrogen is always a plus 1. |
9z0sMWVIm7A-019|So the next step, balance the elements in your two skeletal half cells. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.