chahuadev-fix-comments / docs /COMMIT_GUIDELINES.md
chahuadev's picture
Upload 37 files
1e2511f verified
# Commit Guidelines
## Professional Commit Message Standards
This document outlines the commit message standards for the Chahuadev Fix Comments Tool project. Following these guidelines ensures clear project history and facilitates automated tooling.
## Commit Message Format
```
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>
```
### Type
Must be one of the following:
| Type | Description | Example |
|------|-------------|---------|
| `feat` | New feature | `feat(generator): add bilingual comment support` |
| `fix` | Bug fix | `fix(parser): handle async function comments` |
| `docs` | Documentation only | `docs(api): update comment template examples` |
| `style` | Code style changes | `style(format): fix indentation consistency` |
| `refactor` | Code refactoring | `refactor(analyzer): improve function detection` |
| `perf` | Performance improvement | `perf(ast): optimize parsing performance` |
| `test` | Adding/updating tests | `test(bilingual): add translation tests` |
| `chore` | Maintenance tasks | `chore(deps): update babel dependencies` |
| `ci` | CI/CD changes | `ci(actions): add comment quality checks` |
| `build` | Build system changes | `build(webpack): optimize bundle size` |
| `revert` | Revert previous commit | `revert: remove experimental feature` |
### Scope
The scope should indicate the part of the codebase affected:
| Scope | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `cli` | Command line interface |
| `parser` | AST parsing and analysis |
| `generator` | Comment generation engine |
| `analyzer` | Function and code analysis |
| `bilingual` | Bilingual comment features |
| `ai` | AI-friendly formatting |
| `templates` | Comment templates |
| `config` | Configuration management |
| `docs` | Documentation |
| `tests` | Test files |
| `build` | Build configuration |
### Subject
- Use imperative mood: "add" not "added" or "adds"
- Don't capitalize first letter
- No period at the end
- Maximum 50 characters
### Body
- Wrap at 72 characters
- Explain the what and why, not how
- Use imperative mood
- Separate from subject with blank line
### Footer
- Reference issues and breaking changes
- Format: `Closes #123` or `Fixes #456`
- Breaking changes: `BREAKING CHANGE: description`
## Examples
### Feature Addition
```
feat(bilingual): add Thai language support for comments
Add comprehensive Thai language support for bilingual comment
generation. Includes translation templates for common programming
patterns and automatic language detection.
Features include:
- Thai translation templates for functions and methods
- Automatic language detection based on existing comments
- Bilingual JSDoc format with English/Thai descriptions
- Configuration options for language preferences
This enables Thai developers to maintain code documentation
in both languages, improving code accessibility and team
collaboration.
Closes #67
```
### Bug Fix
```
fix(parser): correctly handle TypeScript generic functions
Fix AST parsing issue where TypeScript generic function signatures
were not properly analyzed, causing missing type information in
generated comments.
The fix includes:
- Improved generic parameter detection
- Proper constraint parsing for bounded generics
- Type inference for complex generic expressions
Before: Generic functions were parsed as regular functions
After: Full generic signature analysis with type constraints
Fixes #89
```
### Breaking Change
```
feat(generator): update comment template format
Change default comment template format to improve readability
and maintain consistency with modern JSDoc standards.
New features:
- Standardized parameter descriptions
- Improved return value documentation
- Better example code formatting
- Enhanced type information display
BREAKING CHANGE: Default comment template format changed from
custom format to standard JSDoc. Users with custom templates
may need to update their configuration.
Migration guide available in MIGRATION.md
Closes #45
```
### Documentation Update
```
docs(templates): add bilingual comment examples
Add comprehensive examples for bilingual comment generation
including various function patterns and use cases.
Examples include:
- Simple function documentation
- Complex generic functions
- React component documentation
- Node.js API documentation
- Error handling patterns
Improves developer onboarding and reduces configuration time.
```
### Performance Improvement
```
perf(ast): optimize function analysis performance
Implement caching strategy for AST analysis, reducing processing
time by 60% for large codebases with many functions.
Optimizations include:
- Function signature caching based on content hash
- Incremental analysis for modified files only
- Memory-efficient AST node storage
- Parallel processing for independent functions
Benchmark results show 60% improvement in processing time
for projects with 1000+ functions.
Closes #112
```
### Test Addition
```
test(bilingual): add comprehensive translation tests
Add test suite covering Thai-English bilingual comment generation
across various function types and complexity levels.
Test coverage includes:
- Simple function translations
- Complex generic function translations
- React component comment translations
- Error handling and edge cases
- Template customization scenarios
Increases bilingual feature test coverage to 95%.
```
## Commit Message Best Practices
### Do's
- Keep commits atomic (one logical change per commit)
- Write clear, descriptive subject lines
- Explain the reasoning behind changes in the body
- Reference relevant issues and pull requests
- Use consistent formatting and terminology
- Write commit messages for future maintainers
### Don'ts
- Don't write vague messages like "fix stuff" or "update code"
- Don't include file names in the subject (use scope instead)
- Don't exceed character limits (50 for subject, 72 for body)
- Don't commit unrelated changes together
- Don't use past tense ("fixed" instead of "fix")
- Don't commit commented-out code or debug logs
## Git Workflow Integration
### Commit Hooks
We recommend setting up commit hooks to enforce these standards:
```bash
# Install commitizen for guided commit messages
npm install -g commitizen cz-conventional-changelog
# Set up the adapter
echo '{ "path": "cz-conventional-changelog" }' > ~/.czrc
```
### Usage with Commitizen
```bash
# Use commitizen for guided commits
git cz
```
### Automated Validation
Our CI pipeline includes commit message validation:
```yaml
# .github/workflows/validate-commits.yml
- name: Validate Commit Messages
uses: wagoid/commitlint-github-action@v4
```
## Release Notes Generation
Following these guidelines enables automated release notes:
```bash
# Generate changelog from commits
conventional-changelog -p angular -i CHANGELOG.md -s
```
## Semantic Versioning Impact
Commit types automatically determine version bumps:
| Commit Type | Version Bump | Example |
|-------------|--------------|---------|
| `fix` | PATCH (3.0.1-beta) | Bug fixes |
| `feat` | MINOR (3.1.0-beta) | New features |
| `BREAKING CHANGE` | MAJOR (4.0.0-beta) | Breaking changes |
## Examples by Project Area
### Parser-Related Commits
```
fix(parser): handle arrow functions in class methods
feat(parser): add support for TypeScript decorators
perf(parser): optimize AST traversal performance
```
### Comment Generation Commits
```
feat(generator): add AI-friendly comment format
fix(generator): improve parameter description inference
docs(generator): update template customization guide
```
### Bilingual Feature Commits
```
feat(bilingual): add automatic language detection
fix(bilingual): handle mixed-language existing comments
test(bilingual): add translation accuracy tests
```
## Tooling Support
### IDE Integration
Many IDEs support commit message templates:
```bash
# Set Git commit template
git config commit.template ~/.gitmessage
```
### VS Code Extensions
Recommended extensions:
- Conventional Commits
- GitLens
- Git Graph
### Command Line Tools
```bash
# Install helpful CLI tools
npm install -g @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional
```
## Review Process
During code review, commit messages are evaluated for:
1. **Clarity**: Is the change purpose clear?
2. **Completeness**: Does it explain what and why?
3. **Standards Compliance**: Does it follow our format?
4. **Technical Accuracy**: Does it accurately describe the change?
## Training and Resources
### Internal Resources
- [Commit Message Workshop Recording](internal-link)
- [Interactive Commit Message Tool](internal-link)
- [Project Style Guide](internal-link)
### External Resources
- [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/)
- [Git Commit Best Practices](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)
- [Angular Commit Guidelines](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit)
---
Following these guidelines helps maintain a professional, clear, and useful project history. For questions about commit message standards, please contact the development team at chahuadev@gmail.com.