Datasets:
dialogue_id string | map_id string | ref_id_unif string | annotation_source string | is_quantificational bool | is_specified bool | is_accommodated bool | is_grounded bool | is_imagined bool | giver_interpretation string | follower_interpretation string | status string | subtype string | concept_id string | speaker string | addressee string | expression string | utt_id int32 | transaction_id string | context_transaction_ids list | end_utt_id_of_context int32 | timed_unit_ids list | start_time float64 | end_time float64 | reason string | source_file string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.0 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_caravan_park@g | m12_caravan_park@f | aligned | grounded | m12_caravan_park | giver | follower | a caravan park | 1 | q1ec1.transaction.1 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1"
] | 6 | [
"q1ec1.tu.6",
"q1ec1.tu.7",
"q1ec1.tu.8"
] | 2.9644 | 3.9394 | G says they start above a caravan park; F acknowledges. Both maps contain a caravan park, so the RE is accepted and linked to that landmark. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.1 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m12_old_mill@g | pending | unspecified | m12_old_mill | giver | follower | an old mill | 3 | q1ec1.transaction.1 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1"
] | 6 | [
"q1ec1.tu.33",
"q1ec1.tu.34",
"q1ec1.tu.35"
] | 17.141 | 17.9381 | G mentions an old mill; F only checks the south-then-back direction and ignores the mill. No uptake or grounding. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.2 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m12_old_mill@g | pending | ungrounded | m12_old_mill | giver | follower | an old mill | 5 | q1ec1.transaction.1 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1"
] | 6 | [
"q1ec1.tu.57",
"q1ec1.tu.58",
"q1ec1.tu.59"
] | 27.1039 | 27.704 | G repeats ‘an old mill on the right’; F replies “right okay.” Uptake occurs, but no explicit linking to a map landmark. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.3 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m12_old_mill@g | pending | ungrounded | m12_old_mill | giver | follower | the mill | 5 | q1ec1.transaction.1 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1"
] | 6 | [
"q1ec1.tu.73",
"q1ec1.tu.74"
] | 30.0528 | 30.3689 | G continues with ‘the mill’ (coreferential). F says “right okay,” acknowledging but without identifying any specific landmark; thus ungrounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.4 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m12_fenced_meadow#0@g | pending | ungrounded | m12_fenced_meadow | giver | follower | a fenced meadow | 13 | q1ec1.transaction.3 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3"
] | 18 | [
"q1ec1.tu.148",
"q1ec1.tu.149",
"q1ec1.tu.150"
] | 71.1265 | 71.8775 | G introduces a fenced meadow below the turn; this matches the lower/right meadow on G’s map. F responds only with “okay,” giving no evidence of locating it, so accommodated but not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.5 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m12_fenced_meadow#0@g | pending | ungrounded | m12_fenced_meadow | giver | follower | that | 13 | q1ec1.transaction.3 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3"
] | 18 | [
"q1ec1.tu.156"
] | 73.3664 | 73.5442 | ‘That’ refers back to the same fenced meadow to be avoided. The follower only acknowledges (“okay”), without linking it to a specific landmark; hence accommodated but not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.6 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_abandoned_cottage@g | m12_abandoned_cottage@f | aligned | grounded | m12_abandoned_cottage | giver | follower | an abandoned cottage | 23 | q1ec1.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4"
] | 25 | [
"q1ec1.tu.204",
"q1ec1.tu.205",
"q1ec1.tu.206"
] | 95.494 | 96.7918 | Giver mentions an abandoned cottage below the S-bend; follower responds “okay.” Both maps contain this landmark, so the follower links it to their cottage. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.7 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_abandoned_cottage@g | m12_abandoned_cottage@f | aligned | grounded | m12_abandoned_cottage | giver | follower | that | 25 | q1ec1.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4"
] | 25 | [
"q1ec1.tu.215"
] | 100.1383 | 100.3623 | ‘that’ resumes the abandoned cottage from utt:23. The follower acknowledged (utt:24) and continues with mmhmm (utt:26), with no repair; hence grounded on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.8 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_abandoned_cottage@g | m12_abandoned_cottage@f | aligned | grounded | m12_abandoned_cottage | giver | follower | that | 27 | q1ec1.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec1.tu.241"
] | 115.8605 | 116.0516 | ‘that’ again refers to the already established abandoned cottage; follower provides uptake by continuing and later saying “okay” (utt:28). | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.9 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_abandoned_cottage@g | m12_abandoned_cottage@f | aligned | grounded | m12_abandoned_cottage | giver | follower | it | 27 | q1ec1.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec1.tu.244"
] | 117.4745 | 117.5742 | ‘it’ in “below it” also points to the abandoned cottage; prior grounding and ongoing acknowledgments indicate successful, grounded reference. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.10 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_fenced_meadow#0@g | m12_fenced_meadow#0@f | aligned | grounded | m12_fenced_meadow | giver | follower | a fenced meadow | 27 | q1ec1.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec1.tu.246",
"q1ec1.tu.247",
"q1ec1.tu.248"
] | 117.8706 | 118.6734 | Introduces a fenced meadow located below the cottage. The follower has a single fenced meadow and acknowledges (utt:28) without confusion, so it’s grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.11 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_fenced_meadow#0@g | m12_fenced_meadow#0@f | aligned | grounded | m12_fenced_meadow | giver | follower | that | 27 | q1ec1.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec1.tu.256"
] | 120.6382 | 120.7881 | ‘that’ refers back to the fenced meadow just introduced in the same utterance; follower replies “okay” (utt:28), so it is accommodated and grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.12 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_abandoned_cottage@g | m12_abandoned_cottage@f | aligned | grounded | m12_abandoned_cottage | giver | follower | the abandoned cottage | 29 | q1ec1.transaction.6 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6"
] | 30 | [
"q1ec1.tu.264",
"q1ec1.tu.265",
"q1ec1.tu.266"
] | 125.4784 | 126.2162 | Definite reuse of the previously mentioned abandoned cottage by the giver. The follower replies “right,” indicating understanding. The landmark appears on both maps, so the reference is accommodated and grounded to the cottage on the follower’s map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.13 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_west_lake@g | m12_west_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m12_west_lake | giver | follower | a west lake | 33 | q1ec1.transaction.7 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7"
] | 33 | [
"q1ec1.tu.302",
"q1ec1.tu.303",
"q1ec1.tu.304"
] | 144.5298 | 145.4126 | G introduces “a west lake” (utt:33). F responds “okay” (utt:34) and later follows related instructions, indicating successful linking to the west lake on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.14 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_west_lake@g | m12_west_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m12_west_lake | giver | follower | which | 35 | q1ec1.transaction.8 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8"
] | 46 | [
"q1ec1.tu.306"
] | 146.0779 | 146.2821 | Relative “which” refers back to the just-mentioned west lake. F acknowledges (utt:36) and engages with details (half ‘u’ shape, utt:38–40), showing grounding on that lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.15 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_west_lake@g | m12_west_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m12_west_lake | giver | follower | the south erm southeast side | 35 | q1ec1.transaction.8 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8"
] | 46 | [
"q1ec1.tu.312",
"q1ec1.tu.313",
"q1ec1.tu.314",
"q1ec1.tu.315",
"q1ec1.tu.316"
] | 147.8038 | 153.008 | “the south erm southeast side” specifies the side of the same west lake. F acknowledges and checks direction (“to the southeast”, utt:40), confirming grounding of the lake reference. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.16 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_west_lake@g | m12_west_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m12_west_lake | giver | follower | that lake | 45 | q1ec1.transaction.8 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8"
] | 46 | [
"q1ec1.tu.356",
"q1ec1.tu.357"
] | 169.0028 | 169.5891 | Deictic “that lake” continues the already shared west-lake reference. F acknowledges (utt:46). No repair needed, so the reference remains grounded to the west lake on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.17 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m12_trig_point@g | pending | ungrounded | m12_trig_point | giver | follower | a trig point | 47 | q1ec1.transaction.9 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9"
] | 50 | [
"q1ec1.tu.368",
"q1ec1.tu.369",
"q1ec1.tu.370"
] | 176.9326 | 177.7823 | Giver mentions a trig point while giving turning instructions. Follower only replies “right” with no evidence of locating it. Trig point exists only on giver’s map, so accommodated but not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.18 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_abandoned_cottage@g | m12_abandoned_cottage@f | aligned | grounded | m12_abandoned_cottage | giver | follower | the abandoned cottage | 49 | q1ec1.transaction.9 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9"
] | 50 | [
"q1ec1.tu.412",
"q1ec1.tu.413",
"q1ec1.tu.414"
] | 200.904 | 202.0278 | ‘The abandoned cottage’ was introduced earlier and acknowledged. Giver reuses it as a checkpoint; follower acknowledges. Both maps contain an abandoned cottage, so the reference is grounded to the follower’s cottage. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.19 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_monument@g | m12_monument@f | aligned | grounded | m12_monument | giver | follower | a monument | 51 | q1ec1.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10"
] | 53 | [
"q1ec1.tu.440",
"q1ec1.tu.441"
] | 210.8717 | 211.5166 | G (utt:51) introduces “a monument.” F immediately responds in utt:52 referencing the monument, showing uptake. Unique monuments exist on both maps, so it’s grounded; G confirms in utt:53. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.20 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_monument@g | m12_monument@f | aligned | grounded | m12_monument | giver | follower | the monument | 51 | q1ec1.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10"
] | 53 | [
"q1ec1.tu.446",
"q1ec1.tu.447"
] | 212.9205 | 213.5397 | G continues in utt:51 with “the monument.” F echoes “outside of the monument” (utt:52) and G confirms (utt:53), grounding the same unique monument on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.21 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_monument@g | m12_monument@f | aligned | grounded | m12_monument | follower | giver | the monument | 52 | q1ec1.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10"
] | 53 | [
"q1ec1.tu.450",
"q1ec1.tu.451"
] | 215.3872 | 215.8782 | F (utt:52) checks “outside of the monument,” and G confirms “yeah” (utt:53). Both link to the single monument on their maps, so it’s grounded and not imagined. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.22 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_nuclear_test_site@g | m12_golf_course@f | misunderstood | misunderstood | m12_nuclear_test_site | giver | follower | a nuclear test site | 55 | q1ec1.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10",
"q1ec1.transaction.11"
] | 56 | [
"q1ec1.tu.490",
"q1ec1.tu.491",
"q1ec1.tu.492",
"q1ec1.tu.493"
] | 238.4778 | 239.8703 | Giver introduces “a nuclear test site” (utt:55). Follower acknowledges (“oh right okay”, utt:56). On follower’s map the corresponding landmark is the golf course, so the RE is grounded to that. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.23 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_nuclear_test_site@g | m12_golf_course@f | misunderstood | misunderstood | m12_nuclear_test_site | giver | follower | that | 55 | q1ec1.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10",
"q1ec1.transaction.11"
] | 56 | [
"q1ec1.tu.501"
] | 246.4356 | 246.6161 | Pronoun “that” refers back to the nuclear test site (utt:55). The follower’s earlier uptake applies; they ground it to their golf course. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.24 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_nuclear_test_site@g | m12_golf_course@f | misunderstood | misunderstood | m12_nuclear_test_site | giver | follower | that there's | 55 | q1ec1.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10",
"q1ec1.transaction.11"
] | 56 | [
"q1ec1.tu.513",
"q1ec1.tu.514"
] | 254.6735 | 255.4343 | “Above that” again uses the nuclear test site as anchor (utt:55). Follower accepts without repair (utt:56), so it’s grounded to the golf course on the follower map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.25 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_east_lake@g | m12_east_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m12_east_lake | giver | follower | an east lake | 55 | q1ec1.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10",
"q1ec1.transaction.11"
] | 56 | [
"q1ec1.tu.515",
"q1ec1.tu.516",
"q1ec1.tu.517"
] | 255.4343 | 256.2229 | Giver mentions “an east lake” (utt:55); follower replies “oh right okay” (utt:56). Both maps have East Lake, so it’s grounded there. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.26 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m12_east_lake@g | m12_east_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m12_east_lake | giver | follower | that's | 59 | q1ec1.transaction.12 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10",
"q1ec1.transaction.11",
"q1ec1.transaction.12"
] | 60 | [
"q1ec1.tu.524"
] | 259.284 | 259.4758 | “That’s” in “that’s the finish” (utt:59) refers back to the already grounded East Lake; follower acknowledges generally, so pronoun reuse remains grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json |
q1ec1 | m12 | q1ec1.ref.27 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m12_finish@g | pending | ungrounded | m12_finish | giver | follower | the finish | 59 | q1ec1.transaction.12 | [
"q1ec1.transaction.1",
"q1ec1.transaction.2",
"q1ec1.transaction.3",
"q1ec1.transaction.4",
"q1ec1.transaction.5",
"q1ec1.transaction.6",
"q1ec1.transaction.7",
"q1ec1.transaction.8",
"q1ec1.transaction.9",
"q1ec1.transaction.10",
"q1ec1.transaction.11",
"q1ec1.transaction.12"
] | 60 | [
"q1ec1.tu.525",
"q1ec1.tu.526"
] | 259.4758 | 259.9857 | Giver states “the finish” (utt:59). Follower says “slightly different” (utt:60) but cannot link it to their map (no finish on follower map), so not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.0 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g | pending | unspecified | m9_site_of_plane_crash | giver | follower | the site of a plane crash | 1 | q1ec2.transaction.1 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1"
] | 3 | [
"q1ec2.tu.25",
"q1ec2.tu.26",
"q1ec2.tu.27",
"q1ec2.tu.28",
"q1ec2.tu.29",
"q1ec2.tu.30"
] | 14.0953 | 15.4853 | Giver directs to the site of a plane crash. Follower gives no uptake about this landmark, only asks to slow down. No grounding. Intended crash is the lower one near start (#0) on giver’s map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.1 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g | pending | unspecified | m9_site_of_plane_crash | giver | follower | it | 1 | q1ec2.transaction.1 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1"
] | 3 | [
"q1ec2.tu.34"
] | 17.5646 | 17.6845 | Pronoun ‘it’ refers back to the same plane crash. The follower still provides no acknowledgment of the landmark, so not accommodated or grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.2 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_start@g | m9_start@f | aligned | grounded | m9_start | follower | giver | the start | 4 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.62",
"q1ec2.tu.63"
] | 25.2577 | 25.8295 | Follower asks about starting from the start; giver replies “mmhmm”. Both link to Start on their maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.3 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_stony_desert@g | m9_waterhole@f | misunderstood | misunderstood | m9_waterhole | follower | giver | the waterhole | 12 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.86",
"q1ec2.tu.87"
] | 31.6619 | 32.2382 | Follower asks about the waterhole; giver says it’s stony desert on their map, mapping the RE to their stony desert (lexical mismatch). | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.4 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_stony_desert@g | m9_stony_desert@f | aligned | grounded | m9_stony_desert | giver | follower | stony desert | 13 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.91",
"q1ec2.tu.92"
] | 34.8407 | 35.5406 | Giver states stony desert; shortly after, follower locates himself relative to the stony desert, showing uptake and grounding. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.5 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_stony_desert@g | m9_stony_desert@f | aligned | grounded | m9_stony_desert | follower | giver | the stony desert | 16 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.113",
"q1ec2.tu.114",
"q1ec2.tu.115"
] | 40.6757 | 41.5866 | Follower mentions the stony desert; giver confirms with “mmhmm”, indicating shared reference. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.6 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m9_savannah@f | pending | ungrounded | m9_savannah | follower | giver | the savannah | 18 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.123",
"q1ec2.tu.124"
] | 46.565 | 47.3761 | Follower asks about passing the savannah; giver answers “no” and redirects without linking to a specific savannah. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.7 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f | misunderstood | misunderstood | m9_site_of_plane_crash | giver | follower | the site of the plane crash | 21 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.134",
"q1ec2.tu.135",
"q1ec2.tu.136",
"q1ec2.tu.137",
"q1ec2.tu.138",
"q1ec2.tu.139"
] | 52.6021 | 53.7187 | Giver refers to the plane crash (likely bottom-left on giver’s map); follower grounds it by saying his plane crash is north of him (the only one on follower map). | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.8 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f | pending | ungrounded | m9_site_of_plane_crash | follower | giver | plane crash | 22 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.143",
"q1ec2.tu.144"
] | 62.9627 | 63.7999 | Follower states location of plane crash; giver doesn’t align but instead asks about another at bottom-left, so no grounding of this mention. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.9 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g | pending | quantificational | m9_site_of_plane_crash | giver | follower | one | 23 | q1ec2.transaction.2 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2"
] | 28 | [
"q1ec2.tu.156"
] | 67.5379 | 67.8155 | Giver asks about existence of a plane crash at bottom-left; follower replies “no”. Existence check only; not linked to a specific landmark on follower map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.10 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_collapsed_shelter@g | pending | quantificational | m9_collapsed_shelter | giver | follower | a collapsed shelter | 29 | q1ec2.transaction.3 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3"
] | 32 | [
"q1ec2.tu.189",
"q1ec2.tu.190",
"q1ec2.tu.191"
] | 84.4632 | 85.3755 | G asks, “have you got a collapsed shelter?” F replies “yes I do,” confirming its existence and linking it to the unique collapsed shelter on their map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.11 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_collapsed_shelter@g | m9_collapsed_shelter@f | aligned | grounded | m9_collapsed_shelter | giver | follower | the collapsed shelter | 31 | q1ec2.transaction.3 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3"
] | 32 | [
"q1ec2.tu.204",
"q1ec2.tu.205",
"q1ec2.tu.206"
] | 89.8726 | 90.8277 | G instructs “round the collapsed shelter”; F previously confirmed having one and acknowledges (“uh-huh”), indicating they locate that landmark on their map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.12 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_savannah@g | m9_savannah@f | aligned | grounded | m9_savannah | giver | follower | the savannah | 33 | q1ec2.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4"
] | 41 | [
"q1ec2.tu.212",
"q1ec2.tu.213"
] | 93.643 | 94.2343 | G asks about meeting the savannah; F answers with a relation (“savannah is to my right”), showing successful grounding to their savannah. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.13 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_collapsed_shelter@g | m9_collapsed_shelter@f | aligned | grounded | m9_collapsed_shelter | follower | giver | the collapsed shelter | 34 | q1ec2.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4"
] | 41 | [
"q1ec2.tu.224",
"q1ec2.tu.225",
"q1ec2.tu.226"
] | 109.5885 | 110.5592 | F mentions “the collapsed shelter” in an explanation; G acknowledges (“mmhmm”). Both maps have this unique landmark, so it’s grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.14 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_savannah@g | m9_savannah@f | aligned | grounded | m9_savannah | follower | giver | the savannah | 34 | q1ec2.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4"
] | 41 | [
"q1ec2.tu.228",
"q1ec2.tu.229"
] | 111.2258 | 111.7494 | F states “my savannah is to my right”; G acknowledges. This links the RE to the specific savannah on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.15 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_savannah@g | m9_savannah@f | aligned | grounded | m9_savannah | follower | giver | the savannah | 38 | q1ec2.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4"
] | 41 | [
"q1ec2.tu.252",
"q1ec2.tu.253"
] | 124.8228 | 125.2454 | F plans to walk east “towards the savannah”; G accepts (“mmhmm”), indicating shared reference to the savannah. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.16 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_collapsed_shelter@g | m9_collapsed_shelter@f | aligned | grounded | m9_collapsed_shelter | follower | giver | the collapsed shelter | 38 | q1ec2.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4"
] | 41 | [
"q1ec2.tu.255",
"q1ec2.tu.256",
"q1ec2.tu.257"
] | 125.5974 | 126.2856 | F adds “past the collapsed shelter”; G responds “mmhmm,” confirming grounding to the unique collapsed shelter. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.17 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_savannah@g | m9_savannah@f | aligned | grounded | m9_savannah | giver | follower | the savannah | 39 | q1ec2.transaction.4 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4"
] | 41 | [
"q1ec2.tu.264",
"q1ec2.tu.265"
] | 127.5626 | 128.0929 | Giver instructs turning when reaching the savannah; follower replies “okay.” Both maps contain savannah, so the reference is understood and grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.18 | llm_annotated | false | true | false | null | null | m9_slate_mountain@g | pending | unaccommodated | m9_slate_mountain | giver | follower | the slate mountain | 43 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.288",
"q1ec2.tu.289",
"q1ec2.tu.290"
] | 137.5593 | 138.2503 | Giver mentions the slate mountain; follower immediately asks for repetition (“over the top of the—”), showing uptake but not understanding; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.19 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m9_slate_mountain@g | pending | ungrounded | m9_slate_mountain | giver | follower | slate mountain | 45 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.296",
"q1ec2.tu.297"
] | 140.5527 | 141.2543 | After clarification “slate mountain,” follower answers “don’t have a slate mountain,” indicating the term was understood but cannot be linked on their map; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.20 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_savannah@f | pending | quantificational | m9_slate_mountain | follower | giver | slate mountain | 46 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.300",
"q1ec2.tu.301"
] | 142.0038 | 142.6104 | Follower denies existence: “don’t have a slate mountain.” Giver acknowledges (“mm”). It’s a quantificational denial; thus no grounding to a landmark. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.21 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_hot_wells@g | m9_hot_springs@f | aligned | grounded | m9_hot_wells | follower | giver | some hot springs | 48 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.306",
"q1ec2.tu.307",
"q1ec2.tu.308"
] | 145.5409 | 146.3954 | Follower reports “hot springs.” Giver aligns by referring to corresponding “hot wells” and uses it to guide. The mention is clearly understood and linked across maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.22 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m9_savannah@f | pending | unspecified | m9_elephants | follower | giver | elephants | 48 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.310"
] | 146.5499 | 147.1882 | Follower also says “elephants,” but the giver gives no uptake and moves on; no evidence of processing or grounding. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.23 | llm_annotated | false | true | false | null | null | m9_hot_wells@g | pending | unaccommodated | m9_hot_wells | giver | follower | the hot wells | 49 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.312",
"q1ec2.tu.313",
"q1ec2.tu.314"
] | 148.004 | 148.587 | Giver explains “the hot wells are after the slate mountain,” but follower lacks both terms; later correction to “hot springs” suggests “hot wells” wasn’t processed; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.24 | llm_annotated | false | true | false | null | null | m9_slate_mountain@g | pending | unaccommodated | m9_slate_mountain | giver | follower | the slate mountain | 49 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.317",
"q1ec2.tu.318",
"q1ec2.tu.319"
] | 149.0514 | 150.0224 | Reference to “the slate mountain” again within the explanation. The follower has already said they don’t have one, so it is not grounded or accommodated. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.25 | llm_annotated | false | true | false | null | null | m9_hot_wells@g | pending | unaccommodated | m9_hot_wells | giver | follower | hot wells | 49 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.333",
"q1ec2.tu.334"
] | 157.3808 | 158.0033 | Giver uses “hot wells” as a height reference; follower only aligns once giver switches to “hot springs,” indicating “hot wells” itself wasn’t processed; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.26 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_hot_wells@g | m9_hot_springs@f | aligned | grounded | m9_hot_wells | giver | follower | the okay hot okay springs | 49 | q1ec2.transaction.5 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5"
] | 51 | [
"q1ec2.tu.335",
"q1ec2.tu.336",
"q1ec2.tu.337",
"q1ec2.tu.338",
"q1ec2.tu.339"
] | 158.5832 | 159.8111 | Giver corrects to follower’s term “hot springs”; follower responds “okay.” The landmark is mutually understood, mapping giver’s hot wells to follower’s hot springs. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.27 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_hot_wells@g | m9_hot_springs@f | aligned | grounded | m9_hot_wells | giver | follower | the springs | 53 | q1ec2.transaction.6 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6"
] | 56 | [
"q1ec2.tu.352",
"q1ec2.tu.353"
] | 165.7605 | 166.3006 | Giver instructs “down below the springs.” Follower immediately echoes this, indicating uptake and linking it to his Hot Springs. On giver’s map the corresponding landmark is Hot Wells. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.28 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_hot_wells@g | m9_hot_springs@f | aligned | grounded | m9_hot_wells | follower | giver | the springs | 54 | q1ec2.transaction.6 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6"
] | 56 | [
"q1ec2.tu.357",
"q1ec2.tu.358"
] | 168.2498 | 168.7685 | Follower checks “walk below the springs,” and the giver replies “uh-huh,” confirming. Follower grounds it to Hot Springs; giver aligns it with his Hot Wells counterpart. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.29 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_white_mountain@g | pending | quantificational | m9_white_mountain | giver | follower | a white mountain | 59 | q1ec2.transaction.7 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7"
] | 64 | [
"q1ec2.tu.371",
"q1ec2.tu.372",
"q1ec2.tu.373"
] | 174.7582 | 175.3882 | G asks if F has a white mountain. F replies yes and later gives its location, indicating grounding. Both maps contain it. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.30 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_white_mountain@g | m9_white_mountain@f | aligned | grounded | m9_white_mountain | follower | giver | a white mountain | 60 | q1ec2.transaction.7 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7"
] | 64 | [
"q1ec2.tu.377",
"q1ec2.tu.378",
"q1ec2.tu.379"
] | 176.3855 | 176.9224 | F confirms “I have a white mountain … to my north.” G acknowledges and proceeds, so the reference is understood and linked to the mountain on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.31 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_white_mountain@g | m9_white_mountain@f | aligned | grounded | m9_white_mountain | giver | follower | the white mountain | 63 | q1ec2.transaction.7 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7"
] | 64 | [
"q1ec2.tu.391",
"q1ec2.tu.392",
"q1ec2.tu.393"
] | 179.8687 | 180.9951 | G gives an instruction relative to the white mountain; F replies “uh-huh,” showing uptake and grounding to the white mountain on their map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.32 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_lake@g | pending | quantificational | m9_lake | giver | follower | a lake | 65 | q1ec2.transaction.8 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8"
] | 68 | [
"q1ec2.tu.401",
"q1ec2.tu.402"
] | 184.3614 | 184.7632 | G asks if F has a lake at the top; F replies “yes uh-huh,” confirming existence and locating their lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.33 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | lake | 67 | q1ec2.transaction.8 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8"
] | 68 | [
"q1ec2.tu.420"
] | 190.2758 | 190.7062 | Following the confirmed existence, G says to walk to the level of “the lake.” F acknowledges, grounding the reference to their lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.34 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | it | 69 | q1ec2.transaction.9 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9"
] | 70 | [
"q1ec2.tu.426"
] | 192.5905 | 192.6145 | ‘It’ follows discussion of the lake (“do you have a lake… yes”). The giver instructs to walk around it; follower acknowledges. Thus the pronoun refers to the lake on both maps, grounded to follower’s lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.35 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_roman_baths@g | pending | quantificational | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | roman baths | 71 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.428",
"q1ec2.tu.429"
] | 194.4703 | 195.218 | G asks about roman baths; F immediately denies having any. Query is existential; uptake and understanding shown; no landmark on F’s map to ground. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.36 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | pending | quantificational | m9_roman_baths | follower | giver | roman baths | 72 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.430",
"q1ec2.tu.431"
] | 196.3344 | 196.9899 | F repeats ‘roman baths’ while denying them. G proceeds with alternative instructions, showing uptake. No specific landmark on F’s map; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | ||
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.37 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | pending | quantificational | m9_roman_baths | follower | giver | any roman baths | 72 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.434",
"q1ec2.tu.435",
"q1ec2.tu.436"
] | 197.2912 | 198.0158 | F says ‘any roman baths’ to deny existence. G continues planning accordingly. Understood but cannot be linked to a place on F’s map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | ||
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.38 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | the lake | 73 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.444",
"q1ec2.tu.445"
] | 200.3677 | 200.8437 | G refers to ‘the lake’; F acknowledges. Both maps show a lake and navigation is based on it; grounded on F’s lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.39 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_white_mountain@g | m9_white_mountain@f | aligned | grounded | m9_white_mountain | follower | giver | the white mountain | 78 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.467",
"q1ec2.tu.468",
"q1ec2.tu.469"
] | 209.1045 | 210.086 | F says ‘round past the white mountain’; G replies ‘no’ about the route, showing recognition. Landmark exists on both maps; grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.40 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | the lake | 79 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.479",
"q1ec2.tu.480"
] | 215.1679 | 215.5961 | G says ‘length of the lake’; F acknowledges. Shared landmark previously confirmed, so F grounds it to their lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.41 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_roman_baths@g | pending | quantificational | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | roman baths | 81 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.483",
"q1ec2.tu.484"
] | 223.0097 | 223.6165 | G again queries ‘roman baths’; earlier F denied and repeats denial immediately after. Understood but not grounded since none on F’s map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.42 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m9_roman_baths@g | pending | ungrounded | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | that | 83 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.492"
] | 224.5542 | 224.7225 | Giver’s ‘that’ (utt:83) refers to roman baths; follower replies “don’t have any roman baths,” indicating understanding but no concrete landmark. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.43 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_roman_baths@g | pending | quantificational | m9_roman_baths | follower | giver | any roman baths | 82 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.494",
"q1ec2.tu.495",
"q1ec2.tu.496"
] | 224.7246 | 225.3438 | Follower denies existence: “don’t have any roman baths” (utt:82). Giver moves on, no specific place identified. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.44 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_antelope@g | pending | quantificational | m9_antelope | giver | follower | antelopes | 83 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.497"
] | 225.1448 | 225.876 | Giver checks “antelopes” (utt:83). Follower confirms and locates them “right in the centre” (utt:84), grounding to their antelope. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.45 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m9_round_rocks@f | pending | unspecified | m9_round_rocks | follower | giver | some round r-- | 82 | q1ec2.transaction.10 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10"
] | 83 | [
"q1ec2.tu.500",
"q1ec2.tu.501",
"q1ec2.tu.502"
] | 225.5267 | 226.1821 | Follower mentions “some round r—” (utt:82). Giver ignores and immediately asks about antelopes; no uptake or linking. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.46 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | follower | giver | some antelopes | 84 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.505",
"q1ec2.tu.506"
] | 226.752 | 227.4667 | Follower asserts “some antelopes right in the centre” (utt:84). Giver continues with layout; shared specific antelope landmark. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.47 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | true | m9_roman_baths@g | m9_roman_baths@g | aligned | grounded | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | the roman baths | 85 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.516",
"q1ec2.tu.517",
"q1ec2.tu.518"
] | 230.2404 | 230.9748 | Giver explains “the roman baths… at the top below the lake” (utt:85). Follower acknowledges and later references their position (utt:86). Baths exist only on giver’s map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.48 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | the lake | 85 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.526",
"q1ec2.tu.527"
] | 232.9517 | 233.3611 | Giver mentions “below the lake” (utt:85). Lake had been established earlier; follower acknowledges (utt:86), so the lake is grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.49 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | giver | follower | the antelope | 85 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.531",
"q1ec2.tu.532"
] | 233.869 | 234.4289 | Giver: “then it’s the antelope” (utt:85). Follower acknowledges and refers to antelopes in next turn (utt:86), grounding them. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.50 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | follower | giver | the antelopes | 86 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.542",
"q1ec2.tu.543"
] | 239.8218 | 240.4921 | Follower asks about going between “the antelopes” and baths (utt:86). Giver replies with left/right relation (utt:87), indicating grounding of antelopes. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.51 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_roman_baths@g | m9_roman_baths@g | aligned | grounded | m9_roman_baths | follower | giver | the roman bath | 86 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.548",
"q1ec2.tu.549",
"q1ec2.tu.550"
] | 241.9611 | 243.1898 | Follower mentions “the position of the roman bath” (utt:86). Giver supplies positional clarification (utt:87). Grounded to baths on giver’s map. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.52 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | giver | follower | it one is | 87 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.552",
"q1ec2.tu.553"
] | 243.9339 | 244.6809 | Giver says “one is just below the other” (utt:87) referring to antelope vs baths. Follower accepts and restates later (utt:88), grounding antelopes. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.53 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | true | m9_roman_baths@g | m9_roman_baths@g | aligned | grounded | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | it'll | 87 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.568"
] | 248.7013 | 248.8232 | Giver: “it’ll be your left, the roman baths” (utt:87). Follower acknowledges (utt:88). Baths only exist on giver’s map, so imagined by follower. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.54 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | true | m9_roman_baths@g | m9_roman_baths@g | aligned | grounded | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | the roman baths | 87 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.572",
"q1ec2.tu.573",
"q1ec2.tu.574"
] | 251.7012 | 252.3525 | Giver repeats “the roman baths” (utt:87); follower acknowledges (utt:88). Grounded to giver-only landmark, hence imagined for follower. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.55 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | giver | follower | the antelopes will | 87 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.576",
"q1ec2.tu.577"
] | 252.4727 | 253.0919 | Giver: “the antelopes will be to your left” (utt:87). Follower immediately confirms same (utt:88). | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.56 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m9_antelope@f | pending | unspecified | m9_antelope | follower | giver | antelopes | 88 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.594"
] | 258.3346 | 258.7101 | Follower checks antelopes being to the left. Giver does not address this, shifting to discuss the lake instead. No uptake; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.57 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | follower | giver | this lake | 88 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.602",
"q1ec2.tu.603"
] | 261.7618 | 262.307 | Follower asks about “this lake.” Giver responds: “your lake is on the right top right,” indicating clear uptake and mapping to the lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.58 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | follower | giver | the lake | 88 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.612",
"q1ec2.tu.613"
] | 264.0873 | 264.359 | Continuation of same lake reference (“back round the lake”). Giver immediately specifies its location, grounding it. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.59 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | your lake | 89 | q1ec2.transaction.11 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11"
] | 89 | [
"q1ec2.tu.617",
"q1ec2.tu.618"
] | 273.7705 | 274.1689 | Giver states “your lake is on the right top right.” Follower replies “okay,” showing understanding and linking to their lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.60 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | the lake | 91 | q1ec2.transaction.12 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12"
] | 98 | [
"q1ec2.tu.636",
"q1ec2.tu.637"
] | 285.6874 | 286.0925 | Giver instructs to walk round the lake; follower acknowledges “okay.” The lake is clearly identified on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.61 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m9_roman_baths@g | pending | ungrounded | m9_roman_baths | giver | follower | the roman baths | 91 | q1ec2.transaction.12 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12"
] | 98 | [
"q1ec2.tu.639",
"q1ec2.tu.640",
"q1ec2.tu.641"
] | 288.6347 | 289.2941 | Giver mentions “the roman baths,” but follower previously denied having any and only says “okay.” No landmark on follower map; not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.62 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | follower | giver | the lake | 94 | q1ec2.transaction.12 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12"
] | 98 | [
"q1ec2.tu.659",
"q1ec2.tu.660"
] | 296.1838 | 296.4802 | Follower checks “underneath the lake then.” Giver confirms and rephrases (“come back under it”), showing successful grounding to the lake. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.63 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_lake@g | m9_lake@f | aligned | grounded | m9_lake | giver | follower | it | 97 | q1ec2.transaction.12 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12"
] | 98 | [
"q1ec2.tu.671"
] | 299.4654 | 299.584 | Pronoun “it” clearly refers to the lake from prior turn. Follower acknowledges (“right that’s that”), indicating successful grounding. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.64 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | giver | follower | the antelopes | 99 | q1ec2.transaction.13 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 100 | [
"q1ec2.tu.683",
"q1ec2.tu.684"
] | 306.8132 | 307.5641 | Giver instructs “straight down to the antelopes.” Follower acknowledges and had earlier confirmed the antelopes’ presence and position, so the reference is understood and linked to the antelopes on both maps. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.65 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_antelope@g | m9_antelope@f | aligned | grounded | m9_antelope | giver | follower | the antelopes | 101 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.694",
"q1ec2.tu.695"
] | 311.053 | 311.7935 | G: “it goes round the bottom of the antelopes” (utt:101). F acknowledges (utt:102). Both maps have antelopes; thus the RE is understood and grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.66 | llm_annotated | false | false | null | null | null | m9_finish@g | pending | unspecified | m9_finish | giver | follower | finish | 105 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.715"
] | 321.1288 | 321.557 | G mentions “the finish” (utt:105) but F responds only about the plane crash (utt:106), giving no uptake to the finish. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.67 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@g | pending | quantificational | m9_site_of_plane_crash | giver | follower | a site of the plane crash | 105 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.719",
"q1ec2.tu.720",
"q1ec2.tu.721",
"q1ec2.tu.722",
"q1ec2.tu.723",
"q1ec2.tu.724"
] | 323.4938 | 324.5372 | G asks existence: “is there a site of the plane crash” (utt:105). F confirms (utt:106). F grounds it to their single plane-crash; G intends the top-right one near finish. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.68 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@g | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f | aligned | grounded | m9_site_of_plane_crash | follower | giver | that | 106 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.728"
] | 325.4031 | 325.52 | F says “I’ve got that” (utt:106), referring to the plane crash. G immediately uses it spatially (“just below there”, utt:107), showing shared grounding. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.69 | llm_annotated | true | null | null | null | null | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f | pending | quantificational | m9_site_of_plane_crash | follower | giver | a site of plane crash | 106 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.731",
"q1ec2.tu.732",
"q1ec2.tu.733",
"q1ec2.tu.734",
"q1ec2.tu.735"
] | 325.6963 | 326.6646 | F adds “I’ve got a site of plane crash” (utt:106), confirming existence. G relates finish to “there” (utt:107), grounding it to the same plane crash. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.70 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | false | null | m9_finish@g | pending | ungrounded | m9_finish | giver | follower | it's | 107 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.737"
] | 327.196 | 327.4595 | G: “it’s just below there” where “it” = finish (utt:107). F replies “just below that” (utt:108) referencing the plane crash, not the finish; finish isn’t on F’s map, so not grounded. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json | |
q1ec2 | m9 | q1ec2.ref.71 | llm_annotated | false | true | true | true | false | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@g | m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f | aligned | grounded | m9_site_of_plane_crash | giver | follower | there | 107 | q1ec2.transaction.14 | [
"q1ec2.transaction.1",
"q1ec2.transaction.2",
"q1ec2.transaction.3",
"q1ec2.transaction.4",
"q1ec2.transaction.5",
"q1ec2.transaction.6",
"q1ec2.transaction.7",
"q1ec2.transaction.8",
"q1ec2.transaction.9",
"q1ec2.transaction.10",
"q1ec2.transaction.11",
"q1ec2.transaction.12",
"q1ec2.transa... | 109 | [
"q1ec2.tu.740"
] | 328.1611 | 328.4404 | G’s “there” (utt:107) refers to the plane crash. F mirrors with “that” (utt:108), confirming the same landmark. | annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json |
GMMT: Grounded Misunderstandings in MapTask
The Grounded Misunderstandings in MapTask (GMMT) dataset was produced for the LREC 2026 paper Grounded Misunderstandings in Asymmetric Dialogue: A Perspectivist Annotation Scheme for MapTask by Nan Li, Albert Gatt, and Massimo Poesio.
It provides perspectivist annotations of the HCRC MapTask corpus, capturing both speaker-intended and addressee-interpreted landmarks for every reference expression (RE). The annotations support quantitative study of how understanding emerges, diverges, and repairs in collaborative dialogue with asymmetric map information.
Key numbers: 16 map pairs · 128 dialogues · 13,077 annotated REs · 5 hierarchical attributes + 2 participant interpretation IDs per RE · 3 human-verified dialogues (504 REs).
Related resources
This Hugging Face repository is the loadable Dataset Viewer / Parquet version of GMMT.
- GitHub release: https://github.com/chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask
- The GitHub repository contains the raw annotation JSON files, prompt template, output schema, reference-expression pointers, and reconstruction script.
- This Hugging Face repository packages GMMT as loadable dataset configurations, while also keeping the raw JSON, schema, scripts, and metadata assets available as files.
Transcript text and licensing
This release does not redistribute full HCRC MapTask transcript text. It includes our
annotations, short reference-expression strings, structural pointers, timing information,
landmark metadata, and model-generated reason explanations. The reason field may contain
short quoted or paraphrased dialogue evidence, but it does not include full transcript context.
To obtain the dialogue text, including the RE-marked transcripts, run the included reconstruction script against your own copy of the MapTask corpus.
Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
# Default: one row per reference expression (13,077 rows)
ds = load_dataset("chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask", "re_level")
# Human-verified gold subset (504 REs from 3 dialogues)
ds = load_dataset("chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask", "re_level_verified")
# One row per dialogue: nested RE annotations + text-less context skeleton
ds = load_dataset("chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask", "dialogue_level")
There is a single train split per config — this is a research/analysis resource, not a
train/test benchmark. The verified subset overlaps the full set (same 3 dialogues), so it is a
separate config, not a validation split.
Configurations
| Config | Rows | Grain |
|---|---|---|
re_level (default) |
13,077 | one reference expression |
re_level_verified |
504 | one RE, 3 human-verified dialogues |
dialogue_level |
128 | one dialogue (nested REs + context skeleton) |
dialogue_level_verified |
3 | one dialogue, verified |
re_level fields
Annotation labels, short RE surface strings, and pointers into the dialogue structure (no transcript text is stored).
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
dialogue_id |
string | e.g. q1ec2 |
map_id |
string | map pair identifier, e.g. m9 |
ref_id_unif |
string | unique RE ID, e.g. q1ec2.ref.0 |
annotation_source |
string | llm_annotated or human_verified |
is_quantificational |
bool | null | cascade step 1 |
is_specified |
bool | null | cascade step 2 |
is_accommodated |
bool | null | cascade step 3 |
is_grounded |
bool | null | cascade step 4 |
is_imagined |
bool | null | cascade step 5 |
giver_interpretation |
string | giver's landmark interpretation |
follower_interpretation |
string | follower's landmark interpretation ("" if not grounded) |
status |
string | aligned / pending / misunderstood |
subtype |
string | finer classification |
concept_id |
string | original MapTask landmark ID used in the raw annotation JSON, e.g. m9_site_of_plane_crash |
speaker |
string | who produced the RE |
addressee |
string | who received it |
expression |
string | the RE surface string (short) |
utt_id |
int | utterance the RE occurs in |
transaction_id |
string | the RE's own transaction |
context_transaction_ids |
list[string] | all transactions from dialogue start through this one — the cumulative context the RE was annotated with |
end_utt_id_of_context |
int | last utterance in the annotation context (end of the RE's transaction) |
timed_unit_ids |
list[string] | unified timed-unit IDs the RE spans (used by the reconstruction script) |
start_time, end_time |
float | RE timing (seconds) |
reason |
string | model-generated explanation; may include short quoted/paraphrased dialogue evidence |
source_file |
string | provenance |
Nullable boolean fields use null when the cascade has already terminated at an earlier step
(e.g. when is_specified = false, the three downstream booleans are null).
Use re_level_verified for the human-verified subset; annotation_source identifies whether a
row comes from llm_annotated or human_verified annotations.
dialogue_level fields
dialogue_id, map_id, annotation_source, num_reference_expressions,
landmark_reference_expressions (the original nested RE annotations), plus a text-less
context skeleton:
utterances:[{ln, utt_id, speaker, transaction_id, ref_ids}]— turn structure and where each RE occurs, without words.transactions:[{transaction_id, utt_ids, end_utt_id, move_types}]— the task-subgoal segmentation used to bound the annotation context.
Fill in the words locally with the reconstruction script (below).
Map image correspondence
The original annotation prompts used both participants' maps as images, but this release does not redistribute MapTask map images. Obtain the map images from your own copy of the HCRC MapTask corpus.
The file assets/dialogue_map_images.csv maps each dialogue to the corresponding map pair and
expected image filenames:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
dialogue_id |
dialogue identifier, e.g. q1ec2 |
map_id |
map pair identifier, e.g. m9 |
giver_map_filename |
expected giver map image filename, e.g. map9g.png |
follower_map_filename |
expected follower map image filename, e.g. map9f.png |
These filenames follow the convention used by the MapTask map image files: for map ID m9,
the expected giver and follower files are map9g.png and map9f.png.
MapTask background
In the HCRC MapTask, a route giver guides a route follower along a route through landmarks. Both hold maps of the same landscape, but the maps are not identical:
- identical landmarks (on both maps);
- lexical variants — different names for the same location (e.g. "white water" vs "rapids");
- existence discrepancies — a landmark on only one map;
- multiplicity discrepancies — a landmark appearing twice on one map, once on the other.
Participants cannot see each other's maps, which makes MapTask a natural setting for studying how references are understood — and misunderstood. The corpus has 16 map pairs (m0–m15), each used in 8 dialogues (128 total).
Annotation schema
Each RE is annotated with a 5-attribute cascade modeling incremental resolution from both
speaker and addressee perspectives. Each step is evaluated only when the previous condition
holds; when it terminates early, downstream attributes are null.
| Step | Attribute | Perspective | Question | Proceed if |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | is_quantificational |
Speaker | Is the RE an existence check? | false |
| 2 | is_specified |
Addressee | Any uptake of the RE? | true |
| 3 | is_accommodated |
Addressee | Processed without mishearing/confusion? | true |
| 4 | is_grounded |
Addressee | Linked to a specific landmark? | true |
| 5 | is_imagined |
Addressee | Grounded landmark absent from addressee's own map? | (terminal) |
Understanding states (status): aligned (both ground to the same/equivalent landmark),
pending (not fully grounded), misunderstood (both believe they agree but ground to
different landmarks).
Landmark ID format: <map_id>_<concept>#<ordinal>@<side> — e.g. m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g
(#ordinal only for multiplicity landmarks: 0=bottom, 1=top; @g/@f = giver/follower map).
Reconstructing the marked transcripts
Because MapTask transcript text cannot be redistributed, the dialogue text is regenerated
locally from your own corpus copy. scripts/reconstruct_transcripts.py reproduces the original
RE-marked transcripts byte-for-byte (verified on all 128 dialogues).
Download the HCRC Map Task Corpus v2.1 from https://groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/maptask/maptasknxt.html and unpack it. The per-side timed-units live in
maptaskv2-1/Data/timed-units/(files named<dialogue>.g.timed-units.xml/<dialogue>.f.timed-units.xml).Run:
python scripts/reconstruct_transcripts.py \ --maptask-tu-dir /path/to/maptaskv2-1/Data/timed-units \ --out-dir ./transcripts_with_refs(
--re-dirand--map-mappingdefault to thereference_expressions/andassets/map_trans_mapping.txtfiles shipped here.)
Output lines look like:
[giver ln:19 utt:13 ] pass well it's <<stony desert id:q1ec2.ref.4 lm:m9_stony_desert>> that's what i've got here
The script fills missing utt IDs, merges giver+follower timed-units, re-derives the unified
timed_unit_ids, and inserts markers anchored on those IDs — so its output aligns exactly with
the timed_unit_ids in this dataset.
Dataset statistics
Cascade attribute distribution across all 13,077 REs:
| Attribute | True | False | Null |
|---|---|---|---|
is_quantificational |
1,604 (12.3%) | 11,473 (87.7%) | 0 |
is_specified |
11,137 (85.2%) | 336 (2.6%) | 1,604 (12.3%) |
is_accommodated |
10,977 (83.9%) | 160 (1.2%) | 1,940 (14.8%) |
is_grounded |
9,965 (76.2%) | 1,012 (7.7%) | 2,100 (16.1%) |
is_imagined |
632 (4.8%) | 9,333 (71.4%) | 3,112 (23.8%) |
Understanding states (after lexical-variant unification):
| Status | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
aligned |
9,435 | 72.1% |
pending |
3,403 | 26.0% |
misunderstood |
239 | 1.8% |
Givers produce 8,679 REs (66.4%), followers 4,398 (33.6%).
Files in this repository
data/ four Parquet configs (the loadable dataset)
raw/dialogues/ 128 original per-dialogue annotation JSONs
raw/human_verified_subset/ 3 gold-standard annotation JSONs
reference_expressions/ 128 RE-extraction JSONs (timed_unit_ids etc.; used by reconstruction)
assets/ landmark metadata (see below)
schema/ annotation_output_schema.json, annotation_prompt_template.json
scripts/ reconstruct_transcripts.py
Asset files (assets/)
landmarks_configuration.csv— metadata for all 267 landmarks (map presence, discrepancy types). Columnsassim/sim/contr/omoare inherited from the original corpus, are not clearly documented, and are unused in our scheme; kept for completeness.lexical_variant_landmark_info.json— the 10 lexical-variant landmark pairs.multiplicity_landmark_position.json— the 16 multiplicity landmarks with instance positions (ordinal0=lower,1=upper).map_trans_mapping.txt— map ID numeric suffix (m0–m15) → its 8 dialogue IDs (space-separated).dialogue_map_images.csv— dialogue ID → map ID and expected giver/follower map image filenames (e.g.,map9g.png,map9f.png).
All asset files were processed from the original HCRC MapTask corpus by the authors.
The original MapTask corpus & licensing
This release contains derived annotations, structure, pointers, short RE strings, landmark metadata, and reconstruction code. The original HCRC MapTask corpus (audio, maps, full transcriptions) is available at https://groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/maptask/ under the corpus's own terms, which do not permit onward redistribution of the transcript text. Accordingly:
- Our annotations, the landmark-metadata assets, prompt template, schema, map-image filename
correspondence, and reconstruction code are released under CC-BY-4.0 (see
LICENSE). - Full MapTask transcript text and map images are not included; obtain them from the link
above and regenerate the marked transcripts locally with
scripts/reconstruct_transcripts.py.
Please also cite and acknowledge the original HCRC MapTask corpus (Anderson et al., 1991).
Citation
If you use the GMMT dataset, please cite:
@inproceedings{li-etal-2026-grounded,
title = {Grounded Misunderstandings in Asymmetric Dialogue: A Perspectivist Annotation Scheme for MapTask},
author = {Li, Nan and Gatt, Albert and Poesio, Massimo},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2026)},
month = {May},
year = {2026},
pages = {4988--5001},
address = {Palma, Mallorca, Spain},
publisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)},
editor = {Piperidis, Stelios and Bel, N{\'u}ria and van den Heuvel, Henk and Ide, Nancy and Krek, Simon and Toral, Antonio},
doi = {10.63317/59anbt78wyj7}
}
Preprint: arXiv:2511.03718.
License
CC-BY-4.0. See LICENSE. This license covers
the released annotations and derived metadata; MapTask transcript text is not included and
remains under the original corpus's terms.
- Downloads last month
- 30