Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
dialogue_id
string
map_id
string
ref_id_unif
string
annotation_source
string
is_quantificational
bool
is_specified
bool
is_accommodated
bool
is_grounded
bool
is_imagined
bool
giver_interpretation
string
follower_interpretation
string
status
string
subtype
string
concept_id
string
speaker
string
addressee
string
expression
string
utt_id
int32
transaction_id
string
context_transaction_ids
list
end_utt_id_of_context
int32
timed_unit_ids
list
start_time
float64
end_time
float64
reason
string
source_file
string
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.0
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_caravan_park@g
m12_caravan_park@f
aligned
grounded
m12_caravan_park
giver
follower
a caravan park
1
q1ec1.transaction.1
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1" ]
6
[ "q1ec1.tu.6", "q1ec1.tu.7", "q1ec1.tu.8" ]
2.9644
3.9394
G says they start above a caravan park; F acknowledges. Both maps contain a caravan park, so the RE is accepted and linked to that landmark.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.1
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m12_old_mill@g
pending
unspecified
m12_old_mill
giver
follower
an old mill
3
q1ec1.transaction.1
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1" ]
6
[ "q1ec1.tu.33", "q1ec1.tu.34", "q1ec1.tu.35" ]
17.141
17.9381
G mentions an old mill; F only checks the south-then-back direction and ignores the mill. No uptake or grounding.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.2
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m12_old_mill@g
pending
ungrounded
m12_old_mill
giver
follower
an old mill
5
q1ec1.transaction.1
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1" ]
6
[ "q1ec1.tu.57", "q1ec1.tu.58", "q1ec1.tu.59" ]
27.1039
27.704
G repeats ‘an old mill on the right’; F replies “right okay.” Uptake occurs, but no explicit linking to a map landmark.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.3
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m12_old_mill@g
pending
ungrounded
m12_old_mill
giver
follower
the mill
5
q1ec1.transaction.1
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1" ]
6
[ "q1ec1.tu.73", "q1ec1.tu.74" ]
30.0528
30.3689
G continues with ‘the mill’ (coreferential). F says “right okay,” acknowledging but without identifying any specific landmark; thus ungrounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.4
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m12_fenced_meadow#0@g
pending
ungrounded
m12_fenced_meadow
giver
follower
a fenced meadow
13
q1ec1.transaction.3
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3" ]
18
[ "q1ec1.tu.148", "q1ec1.tu.149", "q1ec1.tu.150" ]
71.1265
71.8775
G introduces a fenced meadow below the turn; this matches the lower/right meadow on G’s map. F responds only with “okay,” giving no evidence of locating it, so accommodated but not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.5
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m12_fenced_meadow#0@g
pending
ungrounded
m12_fenced_meadow
giver
follower
that
13
q1ec1.transaction.3
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3" ]
18
[ "q1ec1.tu.156" ]
73.3664
73.5442
‘That’ refers back to the same fenced meadow to be avoided. The follower only acknowledges (“okay”), without linking it to a specific landmark; hence accommodated but not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.6
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_abandoned_cottage@g
m12_abandoned_cottage@f
aligned
grounded
m12_abandoned_cottage
giver
follower
an abandoned cottage
23
q1ec1.transaction.4
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4" ]
25
[ "q1ec1.tu.204", "q1ec1.tu.205", "q1ec1.tu.206" ]
95.494
96.7918
Giver mentions an abandoned cottage below the S-bend; follower responds “okay.” Both maps contain this landmark, so the follower links it to their cottage.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.7
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_abandoned_cottage@g
m12_abandoned_cottage@f
aligned
grounded
m12_abandoned_cottage
giver
follower
that
25
q1ec1.transaction.4
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4" ]
25
[ "q1ec1.tu.215" ]
100.1383
100.3623
‘that’ resumes the abandoned cottage from utt:23. The follower acknowledged (utt:24) and continues with mmhmm (utt:26), with no repair; hence grounded on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.8
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_abandoned_cottage@g
m12_abandoned_cottage@f
aligned
grounded
m12_abandoned_cottage
giver
follower
that
27
q1ec1.transaction.5
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5" ]
28
[ "q1ec1.tu.241" ]
115.8605
116.0516
‘that’ again refers to the already established abandoned cottage; follower provides uptake by continuing and later saying “okay” (utt:28).
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.9
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_abandoned_cottage@g
m12_abandoned_cottage@f
aligned
grounded
m12_abandoned_cottage
giver
follower
it
27
q1ec1.transaction.5
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5" ]
28
[ "q1ec1.tu.244" ]
117.4745
117.5742
‘it’ in “below it” also points to the abandoned cottage; prior grounding and ongoing acknowledgments indicate successful, grounded reference.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.10
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_fenced_meadow#0@g
m12_fenced_meadow#0@f
aligned
grounded
m12_fenced_meadow
giver
follower
a fenced meadow
27
q1ec1.transaction.5
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5" ]
28
[ "q1ec1.tu.246", "q1ec1.tu.247", "q1ec1.tu.248" ]
117.8706
118.6734
Introduces a fenced meadow located below the cottage. The follower has a single fenced meadow and acknowledges (utt:28) without confusion, so it’s grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.11
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_fenced_meadow#0@g
m12_fenced_meadow#0@f
aligned
grounded
m12_fenced_meadow
giver
follower
that
27
q1ec1.transaction.5
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5" ]
28
[ "q1ec1.tu.256" ]
120.6382
120.7881
‘that’ refers back to the fenced meadow just introduced in the same utterance; follower replies “okay” (utt:28), so it is accommodated and grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.12
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_abandoned_cottage@g
m12_abandoned_cottage@f
aligned
grounded
m12_abandoned_cottage
giver
follower
the abandoned cottage
29
q1ec1.transaction.6
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6" ]
30
[ "q1ec1.tu.264", "q1ec1.tu.265", "q1ec1.tu.266" ]
125.4784
126.2162
Definite reuse of the previously mentioned abandoned cottage by the giver. The follower replies “right,” indicating understanding. The landmark appears on both maps, so the reference is accommodated and grounded to the cottage on the follower’s map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.13
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_west_lake@g
m12_west_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m12_west_lake
giver
follower
a west lake
33
q1ec1.transaction.7
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7" ]
33
[ "q1ec1.tu.302", "q1ec1.tu.303", "q1ec1.tu.304" ]
144.5298
145.4126
G introduces “a west lake” (utt:33). F responds “okay” (utt:34) and later follows related instructions, indicating successful linking to the west lake on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.14
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_west_lake@g
m12_west_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m12_west_lake
giver
follower
which
35
q1ec1.transaction.8
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8" ]
46
[ "q1ec1.tu.306" ]
146.0779
146.2821
Relative “which” refers back to the just-mentioned west lake. F acknowledges (utt:36) and engages with details (half ‘u’ shape, utt:38–40), showing grounding on that lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.15
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_west_lake@g
m12_west_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m12_west_lake
giver
follower
the south erm southeast side
35
q1ec1.transaction.8
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8" ]
46
[ "q1ec1.tu.312", "q1ec1.tu.313", "q1ec1.tu.314", "q1ec1.tu.315", "q1ec1.tu.316" ]
147.8038
153.008
“the south erm southeast side” specifies the side of the same west lake. F acknowledges and checks direction (“to the southeast”, utt:40), confirming grounding of the lake reference.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.16
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_west_lake@g
m12_west_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m12_west_lake
giver
follower
that lake
45
q1ec1.transaction.8
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8" ]
46
[ "q1ec1.tu.356", "q1ec1.tu.357" ]
169.0028
169.5891
Deictic “that lake” continues the already shared west-lake reference. F acknowledges (utt:46). No repair needed, so the reference remains grounded to the west lake on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.17
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m12_trig_point@g
pending
ungrounded
m12_trig_point
giver
follower
a trig point
47
q1ec1.transaction.9
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9" ]
50
[ "q1ec1.tu.368", "q1ec1.tu.369", "q1ec1.tu.370" ]
176.9326
177.7823
Giver mentions a trig point while giving turning instructions. Follower only replies “right” with no evidence of locating it. Trig point exists only on giver’s map, so accommodated but not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.18
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_abandoned_cottage@g
m12_abandoned_cottage@f
aligned
grounded
m12_abandoned_cottage
giver
follower
the abandoned cottage
49
q1ec1.transaction.9
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9" ]
50
[ "q1ec1.tu.412", "q1ec1.tu.413", "q1ec1.tu.414" ]
200.904
202.0278
‘The abandoned cottage’ was introduced earlier and acknowledged. Giver reuses it as a checkpoint; follower acknowledges. Both maps contain an abandoned cottage, so the reference is grounded to the follower’s cottage.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.19
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_monument@g
m12_monument@f
aligned
grounded
m12_monument
giver
follower
a monument
51
q1ec1.transaction.10
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10" ]
53
[ "q1ec1.tu.440", "q1ec1.tu.441" ]
210.8717
211.5166
G (utt:51) introduces “a monument.” F immediately responds in utt:52 referencing the monument, showing uptake. Unique monuments exist on both maps, so it’s grounded; G confirms in utt:53.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.20
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_monument@g
m12_monument@f
aligned
grounded
m12_monument
giver
follower
the monument
51
q1ec1.transaction.10
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10" ]
53
[ "q1ec1.tu.446", "q1ec1.tu.447" ]
212.9205
213.5397
G continues in utt:51 with “the monument.” F echoes “outside of the monument” (utt:52) and G confirms (utt:53), grounding the same unique monument on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.21
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_monument@g
m12_monument@f
aligned
grounded
m12_monument
follower
giver
the monument
52
q1ec1.transaction.10
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10" ]
53
[ "q1ec1.tu.450", "q1ec1.tu.451" ]
215.3872
215.8782
F (utt:52) checks “outside of the monument,” and G confirms “yeah” (utt:53). Both link to the single monument on their maps, so it’s grounded and not imagined.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.22
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_nuclear_test_site@g
m12_golf_course@f
misunderstood
misunderstood
m12_nuclear_test_site
giver
follower
a nuclear test site
55
q1ec1.transaction.11
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10", "q1ec1.transaction.11" ]
56
[ "q1ec1.tu.490", "q1ec1.tu.491", "q1ec1.tu.492", "q1ec1.tu.493" ]
238.4778
239.8703
Giver introduces “a nuclear test site” (utt:55). Follower acknowledges (“oh right okay”, utt:56). On follower’s map the corresponding landmark is the golf course, so the RE is grounded to that.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.23
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_nuclear_test_site@g
m12_golf_course@f
misunderstood
misunderstood
m12_nuclear_test_site
giver
follower
that
55
q1ec1.transaction.11
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10", "q1ec1.transaction.11" ]
56
[ "q1ec1.tu.501" ]
246.4356
246.6161
Pronoun “that” refers back to the nuclear test site (utt:55). The follower’s earlier uptake applies; they ground it to their golf course.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.24
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_nuclear_test_site@g
m12_golf_course@f
misunderstood
misunderstood
m12_nuclear_test_site
giver
follower
that there's
55
q1ec1.transaction.11
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10", "q1ec1.transaction.11" ]
56
[ "q1ec1.tu.513", "q1ec1.tu.514" ]
254.6735
255.4343
“Above that” again uses the nuclear test site as anchor (utt:55). Follower accepts without repair (utt:56), so it’s grounded to the golf course on the follower map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.25
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_east_lake@g
m12_east_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m12_east_lake
giver
follower
an east lake
55
q1ec1.transaction.11
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10", "q1ec1.transaction.11" ]
56
[ "q1ec1.tu.515", "q1ec1.tu.516", "q1ec1.tu.517" ]
255.4343
256.2229
Giver mentions “an east lake” (utt:55); follower replies “oh right okay” (utt:56). Both maps have East Lake, so it’s grounded there.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.26
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m12_east_lake@g
m12_east_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m12_east_lake
giver
follower
that's
59
q1ec1.transaction.12
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10", "q1ec1.transaction.11", "q1ec1.transaction.12" ]
60
[ "q1ec1.tu.524" ]
259.284
259.4758
“That’s” in “that’s the finish” (utt:59) refers back to the already grounded East Lake; follower acknowledges generally, so pronoun reuse remains grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec1
m12
q1ec1.ref.27
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m12_finish@g
pending
ungrounded
m12_finish
giver
follower
the finish
59
q1ec1.transaction.12
[ "q1ec1.transaction.1", "q1ec1.transaction.2", "q1ec1.transaction.3", "q1ec1.transaction.4", "q1ec1.transaction.5", "q1ec1.transaction.6", "q1ec1.transaction.7", "q1ec1.transaction.8", "q1ec1.transaction.9", "q1ec1.transaction.10", "q1ec1.transaction.11", "q1ec1.transaction.12" ]
60
[ "q1ec1.tu.525", "q1ec1.tu.526" ]
259.4758
259.9857
Giver states “the finish” (utt:59). Follower says “slightly different” (utt:60) but cannot link it to their map (no finish on follower map), so not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec1.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.0
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g
pending
unspecified
m9_site_of_plane_crash
giver
follower
the site of a plane crash
1
q1ec2.transaction.1
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1" ]
3
[ "q1ec2.tu.25", "q1ec2.tu.26", "q1ec2.tu.27", "q1ec2.tu.28", "q1ec2.tu.29", "q1ec2.tu.30" ]
14.0953
15.4853
Giver directs to the site of a plane crash. Follower gives no uptake about this landmark, only asks to slow down. No grounding. Intended crash is the lower one near start (#0) on giver’s map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.1
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g
pending
unspecified
m9_site_of_plane_crash
giver
follower
it
1
q1ec2.transaction.1
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1" ]
3
[ "q1ec2.tu.34" ]
17.5646
17.6845
Pronoun ‘it’ refers back to the same plane crash. The follower still provides no acknowledgment of the landmark, so not accommodated or grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.2
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_start@g
m9_start@f
aligned
grounded
m9_start
follower
giver
the start
4
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.62", "q1ec2.tu.63" ]
25.2577
25.8295
Follower asks about starting from the start; giver replies “mmhmm”. Both link to Start on their maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.3
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_stony_desert@g
m9_waterhole@f
misunderstood
misunderstood
m9_waterhole
follower
giver
the waterhole
12
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.86", "q1ec2.tu.87" ]
31.6619
32.2382
Follower asks about the waterhole; giver says it’s stony desert on their map, mapping the RE to their stony desert (lexical mismatch).
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.4
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_stony_desert@g
m9_stony_desert@f
aligned
grounded
m9_stony_desert
giver
follower
stony desert
13
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.91", "q1ec2.tu.92" ]
34.8407
35.5406
Giver states stony desert; shortly after, follower locates himself relative to the stony desert, showing uptake and grounding.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.5
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_stony_desert@g
m9_stony_desert@f
aligned
grounded
m9_stony_desert
follower
giver
the stony desert
16
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.113", "q1ec2.tu.114", "q1ec2.tu.115" ]
40.6757
41.5866
Follower mentions the stony desert; giver confirms with “mmhmm”, indicating shared reference.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.6
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m9_savannah@f
pending
ungrounded
m9_savannah
follower
giver
the savannah
18
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.123", "q1ec2.tu.124" ]
46.565
47.3761
Follower asks about passing the savannah; giver answers “no” and redirects without linking to a specific savannah.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.7
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f
misunderstood
misunderstood
m9_site_of_plane_crash
giver
follower
the site of the plane crash
21
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.134", "q1ec2.tu.135", "q1ec2.tu.136", "q1ec2.tu.137", "q1ec2.tu.138", "q1ec2.tu.139" ]
52.6021
53.7187
Giver refers to the plane crash (likely bottom-left on giver’s map); follower grounds it by saying his plane crash is north of him (the only one on follower map).
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.8
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f
pending
ungrounded
m9_site_of_plane_crash
follower
giver
plane crash
22
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.143", "q1ec2.tu.144" ]
62.9627
63.7999
Follower states location of plane crash; giver doesn’t align but instead asks about another at bottom-left, so no grounding of this mention.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.9
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g
pending
quantificational
m9_site_of_plane_crash
giver
follower
one
23
q1ec2.transaction.2
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2" ]
28
[ "q1ec2.tu.156" ]
67.5379
67.8155
Giver asks about existence of a plane crash at bottom-left; follower replies “no”. Existence check only; not linked to a specific landmark on follower map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.10
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_collapsed_shelter@g
pending
quantificational
m9_collapsed_shelter
giver
follower
a collapsed shelter
29
q1ec2.transaction.3
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3" ]
32
[ "q1ec2.tu.189", "q1ec2.tu.190", "q1ec2.tu.191" ]
84.4632
85.3755
G asks, “have you got a collapsed shelter?” F replies “yes I do,” confirming its existence and linking it to the unique collapsed shelter on their map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.11
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_collapsed_shelter@g
m9_collapsed_shelter@f
aligned
grounded
m9_collapsed_shelter
giver
follower
the collapsed shelter
31
q1ec2.transaction.3
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3" ]
32
[ "q1ec2.tu.204", "q1ec2.tu.205", "q1ec2.tu.206" ]
89.8726
90.8277
G instructs “round the collapsed shelter”; F previously confirmed having one and acknowledges (“uh-huh”), indicating they locate that landmark on their map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.12
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_savannah@g
m9_savannah@f
aligned
grounded
m9_savannah
giver
follower
the savannah
33
q1ec2.transaction.4
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4" ]
41
[ "q1ec2.tu.212", "q1ec2.tu.213" ]
93.643
94.2343
G asks about meeting the savannah; F answers with a relation (“savannah is to my right”), showing successful grounding to their savannah.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.13
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_collapsed_shelter@g
m9_collapsed_shelter@f
aligned
grounded
m9_collapsed_shelter
follower
giver
the collapsed shelter
34
q1ec2.transaction.4
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4" ]
41
[ "q1ec2.tu.224", "q1ec2.tu.225", "q1ec2.tu.226" ]
109.5885
110.5592
F mentions “the collapsed shelter” in an explanation; G acknowledges (“mmhmm”). Both maps have this unique landmark, so it’s grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.14
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_savannah@g
m9_savannah@f
aligned
grounded
m9_savannah
follower
giver
the savannah
34
q1ec2.transaction.4
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4" ]
41
[ "q1ec2.tu.228", "q1ec2.tu.229" ]
111.2258
111.7494
F states “my savannah is to my right”; G acknowledges. This links the RE to the specific savannah on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.15
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_savannah@g
m9_savannah@f
aligned
grounded
m9_savannah
follower
giver
the savannah
38
q1ec2.transaction.4
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4" ]
41
[ "q1ec2.tu.252", "q1ec2.tu.253" ]
124.8228
125.2454
F plans to walk east “towards the savannah”; G accepts (“mmhmm”), indicating shared reference to the savannah.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.16
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_collapsed_shelter@g
m9_collapsed_shelter@f
aligned
grounded
m9_collapsed_shelter
follower
giver
the collapsed shelter
38
q1ec2.transaction.4
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4" ]
41
[ "q1ec2.tu.255", "q1ec2.tu.256", "q1ec2.tu.257" ]
125.5974
126.2856
F adds “past the collapsed shelter”; G responds “mmhmm,” confirming grounding to the unique collapsed shelter.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.17
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_savannah@g
m9_savannah@f
aligned
grounded
m9_savannah
giver
follower
the savannah
39
q1ec2.transaction.4
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4" ]
41
[ "q1ec2.tu.264", "q1ec2.tu.265" ]
127.5626
128.0929
Giver instructs turning when reaching the savannah; follower replies “okay.” Both maps contain savannah, so the reference is understood and grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.18
llm_annotated
false
true
false
null
null
m9_slate_mountain@g
pending
unaccommodated
m9_slate_mountain
giver
follower
the slate mountain
43
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.288", "q1ec2.tu.289", "q1ec2.tu.290" ]
137.5593
138.2503
Giver mentions the slate mountain; follower immediately asks for repetition (“over the top of the—”), showing uptake but not understanding; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.19
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m9_slate_mountain@g
pending
ungrounded
m9_slate_mountain
giver
follower
slate mountain
45
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.296", "q1ec2.tu.297" ]
140.5527
141.2543
After clarification “slate mountain,” follower answers “don’t have a slate mountain,” indicating the term was understood but cannot be linked on their map; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.20
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_savannah@f
pending
quantificational
m9_slate_mountain
follower
giver
slate mountain
46
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.300", "q1ec2.tu.301" ]
142.0038
142.6104
Follower denies existence: “don’t have a slate mountain.” Giver acknowledges (“mm”). It’s a quantificational denial; thus no grounding to a landmark.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.21
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_hot_wells@g
m9_hot_springs@f
aligned
grounded
m9_hot_wells
follower
giver
some hot springs
48
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.306", "q1ec2.tu.307", "q1ec2.tu.308" ]
145.5409
146.3954
Follower reports “hot springs.” Giver aligns by referring to corresponding “hot wells” and uses it to guide. The mention is clearly understood and linked across maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.22
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m9_savannah@f
pending
unspecified
m9_elephants
follower
giver
elephants
48
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.310" ]
146.5499
147.1882
Follower also says “elephants,” but the giver gives no uptake and moves on; no evidence of processing or grounding.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.23
llm_annotated
false
true
false
null
null
m9_hot_wells@g
pending
unaccommodated
m9_hot_wells
giver
follower
the hot wells
49
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.312", "q1ec2.tu.313", "q1ec2.tu.314" ]
148.004
148.587
Giver explains “the hot wells are after the slate mountain,” but follower lacks both terms; later correction to “hot springs” suggests “hot wells” wasn’t processed; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.24
llm_annotated
false
true
false
null
null
m9_slate_mountain@g
pending
unaccommodated
m9_slate_mountain
giver
follower
the slate mountain
49
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.317", "q1ec2.tu.318", "q1ec2.tu.319" ]
149.0514
150.0224
Reference to “the slate mountain” again within the explanation. The follower has already said they don’t have one, so it is not grounded or accommodated.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.25
llm_annotated
false
true
false
null
null
m9_hot_wells@g
pending
unaccommodated
m9_hot_wells
giver
follower
hot wells
49
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.333", "q1ec2.tu.334" ]
157.3808
158.0033
Giver uses “hot wells” as a height reference; follower only aligns once giver switches to “hot springs,” indicating “hot wells” itself wasn’t processed; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.26
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_hot_wells@g
m9_hot_springs@f
aligned
grounded
m9_hot_wells
giver
follower
the okay hot okay springs
49
q1ec2.transaction.5
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5" ]
51
[ "q1ec2.tu.335", "q1ec2.tu.336", "q1ec2.tu.337", "q1ec2.tu.338", "q1ec2.tu.339" ]
158.5832
159.8111
Giver corrects to follower’s term “hot springs”; follower responds “okay.” The landmark is mutually understood, mapping giver’s hot wells to follower’s hot springs.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.27
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_hot_wells@g
m9_hot_springs@f
aligned
grounded
m9_hot_wells
giver
follower
the springs
53
q1ec2.transaction.6
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6" ]
56
[ "q1ec2.tu.352", "q1ec2.tu.353" ]
165.7605
166.3006
Giver instructs “down below the springs.” Follower immediately echoes this, indicating uptake and linking it to his Hot Springs. On giver’s map the corresponding landmark is Hot Wells.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.28
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_hot_wells@g
m9_hot_springs@f
aligned
grounded
m9_hot_wells
follower
giver
the springs
54
q1ec2.transaction.6
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6" ]
56
[ "q1ec2.tu.357", "q1ec2.tu.358" ]
168.2498
168.7685
Follower checks “walk below the springs,” and the giver replies “uh-huh,” confirming. Follower grounds it to Hot Springs; giver aligns it with his Hot Wells counterpart.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.29
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_white_mountain@g
pending
quantificational
m9_white_mountain
giver
follower
a white mountain
59
q1ec2.transaction.7
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7" ]
64
[ "q1ec2.tu.371", "q1ec2.tu.372", "q1ec2.tu.373" ]
174.7582
175.3882
G asks if F has a white mountain. F replies yes and later gives its location, indicating grounding. Both maps contain it.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.30
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_white_mountain@g
m9_white_mountain@f
aligned
grounded
m9_white_mountain
follower
giver
a white mountain
60
q1ec2.transaction.7
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7" ]
64
[ "q1ec2.tu.377", "q1ec2.tu.378", "q1ec2.tu.379" ]
176.3855
176.9224
F confirms “I have a white mountain … to my north.” G acknowledges and proceeds, so the reference is understood and linked to the mountain on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.31
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_white_mountain@g
m9_white_mountain@f
aligned
grounded
m9_white_mountain
giver
follower
the white mountain
63
q1ec2.transaction.7
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7" ]
64
[ "q1ec2.tu.391", "q1ec2.tu.392", "q1ec2.tu.393" ]
179.8687
180.9951
G gives an instruction relative to the white mountain; F replies “uh-huh,” showing uptake and grounding to the white mountain on their map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.32
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_lake@g
pending
quantificational
m9_lake
giver
follower
a lake
65
q1ec2.transaction.8
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8" ]
68
[ "q1ec2.tu.401", "q1ec2.tu.402" ]
184.3614
184.7632
G asks if F has a lake at the top; F replies “yes uh-huh,” confirming existence and locating their lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.33
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
lake
67
q1ec2.transaction.8
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8" ]
68
[ "q1ec2.tu.420" ]
190.2758
190.7062
Following the confirmed existence, G says to walk to the level of “the lake.” F acknowledges, grounding the reference to their lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.34
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
it
69
q1ec2.transaction.9
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9" ]
70
[ "q1ec2.tu.426" ]
192.5905
192.6145
‘It’ follows discussion of the lake (“do you have a lake… yes”). The giver instructs to walk around it; follower acknowledges. Thus the pronoun refers to the lake on both maps, grounded to follower’s lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.35
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_roman_baths@g
pending
quantificational
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
roman baths
71
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.428", "q1ec2.tu.429" ]
194.4703
195.218
G asks about roman baths; F immediately denies having any. Query is existential; uptake and understanding shown; no landmark on F’s map to ground.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.36
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
pending
quantificational
m9_roman_baths
follower
giver
roman baths
72
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.430", "q1ec2.tu.431" ]
196.3344
196.9899
F repeats ‘roman baths’ while denying them. G proceeds with alternative instructions, showing uptake. No specific landmark on F’s map; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.37
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
pending
quantificational
m9_roman_baths
follower
giver
any roman baths
72
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.434", "q1ec2.tu.435", "q1ec2.tu.436" ]
197.2912
198.0158
F says ‘any roman baths’ to deny existence. G continues planning accordingly. Understood but cannot be linked to a place on F’s map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.38
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
the lake
73
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.444", "q1ec2.tu.445" ]
200.3677
200.8437
G refers to ‘the lake’; F acknowledges. Both maps show a lake and navigation is based on it; grounded on F’s lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.39
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_white_mountain@g
m9_white_mountain@f
aligned
grounded
m9_white_mountain
follower
giver
the white mountain
78
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.467", "q1ec2.tu.468", "q1ec2.tu.469" ]
209.1045
210.086
F says ‘round past the white mountain’; G replies ‘no’ about the route, showing recognition. Landmark exists on both maps; grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.40
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
the lake
79
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.479", "q1ec2.tu.480" ]
215.1679
215.5961
G says ‘length of the lake’; F acknowledges. Shared landmark previously confirmed, so F grounds it to their lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.41
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_roman_baths@g
pending
quantificational
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
roman baths
81
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.483", "q1ec2.tu.484" ]
223.0097
223.6165
G again queries ‘roman baths’; earlier F denied and repeats denial immediately after. Understood but not grounded since none on F’s map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.42
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m9_roman_baths@g
pending
ungrounded
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
that
83
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.492" ]
224.5542
224.7225
Giver’s ‘that’ (utt:83) refers to roman baths; follower replies “don’t have any roman baths,” indicating understanding but no concrete landmark.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.43
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_roman_baths@g
pending
quantificational
m9_roman_baths
follower
giver
any roman baths
82
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.494", "q1ec2.tu.495", "q1ec2.tu.496" ]
224.7246
225.3438
Follower denies existence: “don’t have any roman baths” (utt:82). Giver moves on, no specific place identified.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.44
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_antelope@g
pending
quantificational
m9_antelope
giver
follower
antelopes
83
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.497" ]
225.1448
225.876
Giver checks “antelopes” (utt:83). Follower confirms and locates them “right in the centre” (utt:84), grounding to their antelope.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.45
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m9_round_rocks@f
pending
unspecified
m9_round_rocks
follower
giver
some round r--
82
q1ec2.transaction.10
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10" ]
83
[ "q1ec2.tu.500", "q1ec2.tu.501", "q1ec2.tu.502" ]
225.5267
226.1821
Follower mentions “some round r—” (utt:82). Giver ignores and immediately asks about antelopes; no uptake or linking.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.46
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
follower
giver
some antelopes
84
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.505", "q1ec2.tu.506" ]
226.752
227.4667
Follower asserts “some antelopes right in the centre” (utt:84). Giver continues with layout; shared specific antelope landmark.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.47
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
true
m9_roman_baths@g
m9_roman_baths@g
aligned
grounded
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
the roman baths
85
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.516", "q1ec2.tu.517", "q1ec2.tu.518" ]
230.2404
230.9748
Giver explains “the roman baths… at the top below the lake” (utt:85). Follower acknowledges and later references their position (utt:86). Baths exist only on giver’s map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.48
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
the lake
85
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.526", "q1ec2.tu.527" ]
232.9517
233.3611
Giver mentions “below the lake” (utt:85). Lake had been established earlier; follower acknowledges (utt:86), so the lake is grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.49
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
giver
follower
the antelope
85
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.531", "q1ec2.tu.532" ]
233.869
234.4289
Giver: “then it’s the antelope” (utt:85). Follower acknowledges and refers to antelopes in next turn (utt:86), grounding them.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.50
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
follower
giver
the antelopes
86
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.542", "q1ec2.tu.543" ]
239.8218
240.4921
Follower asks about going between “the antelopes” and baths (utt:86). Giver replies with left/right relation (utt:87), indicating grounding of antelopes.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.51
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_roman_baths@g
m9_roman_baths@g
aligned
grounded
m9_roman_baths
follower
giver
the roman bath
86
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.548", "q1ec2.tu.549", "q1ec2.tu.550" ]
241.9611
243.1898
Follower mentions “the position of the roman bath” (utt:86). Giver supplies positional clarification (utt:87). Grounded to baths on giver’s map.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.52
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
giver
follower
it one is
87
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.552", "q1ec2.tu.553" ]
243.9339
244.6809
Giver says “one is just below the other” (utt:87) referring to antelope vs baths. Follower accepts and restates later (utt:88), grounding antelopes.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.53
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
true
m9_roman_baths@g
m9_roman_baths@g
aligned
grounded
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
it'll
87
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.568" ]
248.7013
248.8232
Giver: “it’ll be your left, the roman baths” (utt:87). Follower acknowledges (utt:88). Baths only exist on giver’s map, so imagined by follower.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.54
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
true
m9_roman_baths@g
m9_roman_baths@g
aligned
grounded
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
the roman baths
87
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.572", "q1ec2.tu.573", "q1ec2.tu.574" ]
251.7012
252.3525
Giver repeats “the roman baths” (utt:87); follower acknowledges (utt:88). Grounded to giver-only landmark, hence imagined for follower.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.55
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
giver
follower
the antelopes will
87
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.576", "q1ec2.tu.577" ]
252.4727
253.0919
Giver: “the antelopes will be to your left” (utt:87). Follower immediately confirms same (utt:88).
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.56
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m9_antelope@f
pending
unspecified
m9_antelope
follower
giver
antelopes
88
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.594" ]
258.3346
258.7101
Follower checks antelopes being to the left. Giver does not address this, shifting to discuss the lake instead. No uptake; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.57
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
follower
giver
this lake
88
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.602", "q1ec2.tu.603" ]
261.7618
262.307
Follower asks about “this lake.” Giver responds: “your lake is on the right top right,” indicating clear uptake and mapping to the lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.58
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
follower
giver
the lake
88
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.612", "q1ec2.tu.613" ]
264.0873
264.359
Continuation of same lake reference (“back round the lake”). Giver immediately specifies its location, grounding it.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.59
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
your lake
89
q1ec2.transaction.11
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11" ]
89
[ "q1ec2.tu.617", "q1ec2.tu.618" ]
273.7705
274.1689
Giver states “your lake is on the right top right.” Follower replies “okay,” showing understanding and linking to their lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.60
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
the lake
91
q1ec2.transaction.12
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12" ]
98
[ "q1ec2.tu.636", "q1ec2.tu.637" ]
285.6874
286.0925
Giver instructs to walk round the lake; follower acknowledges “okay.” The lake is clearly identified on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.61
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m9_roman_baths@g
pending
ungrounded
m9_roman_baths
giver
follower
the roman baths
91
q1ec2.transaction.12
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12" ]
98
[ "q1ec2.tu.639", "q1ec2.tu.640", "q1ec2.tu.641" ]
288.6347
289.2941
Giver mentions “the roman baths,” but follower previously denied having any and only says “okay.” No landmark on follower map; not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.62
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
follower
giver
the lake
94
q1ec2.transaction.12
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12" ]
98
[ "q1ec2.tu.659", "q1ec2.tu.660" ]
296.1838
296.4802
Follower checks “underneath the lake then.” Giver confirms and rephrases (“come back under it”), showing successful grounding to the lake.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.63
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_lake@g
m9_lake@f
aligned
grounded
m9_lake
giver
follower
it
97
q1ec2.transaction.12
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12" ]
98
[ "q1ec2.tu.671" ]
299.4654
299.584
Pronoun “it” clearly refers to the lake from prior turn. Follower acknowledges (“right that’s that”), indicating successful grounding.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.64
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
giver
follower
the antelopes
99
q1ec2.transaction.13
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
100
[ "q1ec2.tu.683", "q1ec2.tu.684" ]
306.8132
307.5641
Giver instructs “straight down to the antelopes.” Follower acknowledges and had earlier confirmed the antelopes’ presence and position, so the reference is understood and linked to the antelopes on both maps.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.65
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_antelope@g
m9_antelope@f
aligned
grounded
m9_antelope
giver
follower
the antelopes
101
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.694", "q1ec2.tu.695" ]
311.053
311.7935
G: “it goes round the bottom of the antelopes” (utt:101). F acknowledges (utt:102). Both maps have antelopes; thus the RE is understood and grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.66
llm_annotated
false
false
null
null
null
m9_finish@g
pending
unspecified
m9_finish
giver
follower
finish
105
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.715" ]
321.1288
321.557
G mentions “the finish” (utt:105) but F responds only about the plane crash (utt:106), giving no uptake to the finish.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.67
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@g
pending
quantificational
m9_site_of_plane_crash
giver
follower
a site of the plane crash
105
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.719", "q1ec2.tu.720", "q1ec2.tu.721", "q1ec2.tu.722", "q1ec2.tu.723", "q1ec2.tu.724" ]
323.4938
324.5372
G asks existence: “is there a site of the plane crash” (utt:105). F confirms (utt:106). F grounds it to their single plane-crash; G intends the top-right one near finish.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.68
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@g
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f
aligned
grounded
m9_site_of_plane_crash
follower
giver
that
106
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.728" ]
325.4031
325.52
F says “I’ve got that” (utt:106), referring to the plane crash. G immediately uses it spatially (“just below there”, utt:107), showing shared grounding.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.69
llm_annotated
true
null
null
null
null
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f
pending
quantificational
m9_site_of_plane_crash
follower
giver
a site of plane crash
106
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.731", "q1ec2.tu.732", "q1ec2.tu.733", "q1ec2.tu.734", "q1ec2.tu.735" ]
325.6963
326.6646
F adds “I’ve got a site of plane crash” (utt:106), confirming existence. G relates finish to “there” (utt:107), grounding it to the same plane crash.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.70
llm_annotated
false
true
true
false
null
m9_finish@g
pending
ungrounded
m9_finish
giver
follower
it's
107
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.737" ]
327.196
327.4595
G: “it’s just below there” where “it” = finish (utt:107). F replies “just below that” (utt:108) referencing the plane crash, not the finish; finish isn’t on F’s map, so not grounded.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
q1ec2
m9
q1ec2.ref.71
llm_annotated
false
true
true
true
false
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@g
m9_site_of_plane_crash#1@f
aligned
grounded
m9_site_of_plane_crash
giver
follower
there
107
q1ec2.transaction.14
[ "q1ec2.transaction.1", "q1ec2.transaction.2", "q1ec2.transaction.3", "q1ec2.transaction.4", "q1ec2.transaction.5", "q1ec2.transaction.6", "q1ec2.transaction.7", "q1ec2.transaction.8", "q1ec2.transaction.9", "q1ec2.transaction.10", "q1ec2.transaction.11", "q1ec2.transaction.12", "q1ec2.transa...
109
[ "q1ec2.tu.740" ]
328.1611
328.4404
G’s “there” (utt:107) refers to the plane crash. F mirrors with “that” (utt:108), confirming the same landmark.
annotations/dialogues/q1ec2.annotated.json
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

GMMT: Grounded Misunderstandings in MapTask

The Grounded Misunderstandings in MapTask (GMMT) dataset was produced for the LREC 2026 paper Grounded Misunderstandings in Asymmetric Dialogue: A Perspectivist Annotation Scheme for MapTask by Nan Li, Albert Gatt, and Massimo Poesio.

It provides perspectivist annotations of the HCRC MapTask corpus, capturing both speaker-intended and addressee-interpreted landmarks for every reference expression (RE). The annotations support quantitative study of how understanding emerges, diverges, and repairs in collaborative dialogue with asymmetric map information.

Key numbers: 16 map pairs · 128 dialogues · 13,077 annotated REs · 5 hierarchical attributes + 2 participant interpretation IDs per RE · 3 human-verified dialogues (504 REs).

Related resources

This Hugging Face repository is the loadable Dataset Viewer / Parquet version of GMMT.

  • GitHub release: https://github.com/chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask
  • The GitHub repository contains the raw annotation JSON files, prompt template, output schema, reference-expression pointers, and reconstruction script.
  • This Hugging Face repository packages GMMT as loadable dataset configurations, while also keeping the raw JSON, schema, scripts, and metadata assets available as files.

Transcript text and licensing

This release does not redistribute full HCRC MapTask transcript text. It includes our annotations, short reference-expression strings, structural pointers, timing information, landmark metadata, and model-generated reason explanations. The reason field may contain short quoted or paraphrased dialogue evidence, but it does not include full transcript context.

To obtain the dialogue text, including the RE-marked transcripts, run the included reconstruction script against your own copy of the MapTask corpus.

Loading

from datasets import load_dataset

# Default: one row per reference expression (13,077 rows)
ds = load_dataset("chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask", "re_level")

# Human-verified gold subset (504 REs from 3 dialogues)
ds = load_dataset("chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask", "re_level_verified")

# One row per dialogue: nested RE annotations + text-less context skeleton
ds = load_dataset("chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask", "dialogue_level")

There is a single train split per config — this is a research/analysis resource, not a train/test benchmark. The verified subset overlaps the full set (same 3 dialogues), so it is a separate config, not a validation split.

Configurations

Config Rows Grain
re_level (default) 13,077 one reference expression
re_level_verified 504 one RE, 3 human-verified dialogues
dialogue_level 128 one dialogue (nested REs + context skeleton)
dialogue_level_verified 3 one dialogue, verified

re_level fields

Annotation labels, short RE surface strings, and pointers into the dialogue structure (no transcript text is stored).

Field Type Description
dialogue_id string e.g. q1ec2
map_id string map pair identifier, e.g. m9
ref_id_unif string unique RE ID, e.g. q1ec2.ref.0
annotation_source string llm_annotated or human_verified
is_quantificational bool | null cascade step 1
is_specified bool | null cascade step 2
is_accommodated bool | null cascade step 3
is_grounded bool | null cascade step 4
is_imagined bool | null cascade step 5
giver_interpretation string giver's landmark interpretation
follower_interpretation string follower's landmark interpretation ("" if not grounded)
status string aligned / pending / misunderstood
subtype string finer classification
concept_id string original MapTask landmark ID used in the raw annotation JSON, e.g. m9_site_of_plane_crash
speaker string who produced the RE
addressee string who received it
expression string the RE surface string (short)
utt_id int utterance the RE occurs in
transaction_id string the RE's own transaction
context_transaction_ids list[string] all transactions from dialogue start through this one — the cumulative context the RE was annotated with
end_utt_id_of_context int last utterance in the annotation context (end of the RE's transaction)
timed_unit_ids list[string] unified timed-unit IDs the RE spans (used by the reconstruction script)
start_time, end_time float RE timing (seconds)
reason string model-generated explanation; may include short quoted/paraphrased dialogue evidence
source_file string provenance

Nullable boolean fields use null when the cascade has already terminated at an earlier step (e.g. when is_specified = false, the three downstream booleans are null). Use re_level_verified for the human-verified subset; annotation_source identifies whether a row comes from llm_annotated or human_verified annotations.

dialogue_level fields

dialogue_id, map_id, annotation_source, num_reference_expressions, landmark_reference_expressions (the original nested RE annotations), plus a text-less context skeleton:

  • utterances: [{ln, utt_id, speaker, transaction_id, ref_ids}] — turn structure and where each RE occurs, without words.
  • transactions: [{transaction_id, utt_ids, end_utt_id, move_types}] — the task-subgoal segmentation used to bound the annotation context.

Fill in the words locally with the reconstruction script (below).

Map image correspondence

The original annotation prompts used both participants' maps as images, but this release does not redistribute MapTask map images. Obtain the map images from your own copy of the HCRC MapTask corpus.

The file assets/dialogue_map_images.csv maps each dialogue to the corresponding map pair and expected image filenames:

Field Description
dialogue_id dialogue identifier, e.g. q1ec2
map_id map pair identifier, e.g. m9
giver_map_filename expected giver map image filename, e.g. map9g.png
follower_map_filename expected follower map image filename, e.g. map9f.png

These filenames follow the convention used by the MapTask map image files: for map ID m9, the expected giver and follower files are map9g.png and map9f.png.

MapTask background

In the HCRC MapTask, a route giver guides a route follower along a route through landmarks. Both hold maps of the same landscape, but the maps are not identical:

  • identical landmarks (on both maps);
  • lexical variants — different names for the same location (e.g. "white water" vs "rapids");
  • existence discrepancies — a landmark on only one map;
  • multiplicity discrepancies — a landmark appearing twice on one map, once on the other.

Participants cannot see each other's maps, which makes MapTask a natural setting for studying how references are understood — and misunderstood. The corpus has 16 map pairs (m0–m15), each used in 8 dialogues (128 total).

Annotation schema

Each RE is annotated with a 5-attribute cascade modeling incremental resolution from both speaker and addressee perspectives. Each step is evaluated only when the previous condition holds; when it terminates early, downstream attributes are null.

Step Attribute Perspective Question Proceed if
1 is_quantificational Speaker Is the RE an existence check? false
2 is_specified Addressee Any uptake of the RE? true
3 is_accommodated Addressee Processed without mishearing/confusion? true
4 is_grounded Addressee Linked to a specific landmark? true
5 is_imagined Addressee Grounded landmark absent from addressee's own map? (terminal)

Understanding states (status): aligned (both ground to the same/equivalent landmark), pending (not fully grounded), misunderstood (both believe they agree but ground to different landmarks).

Landmark ID format: <map_id>_<concept>#<ordinal>@<side> — e.g. m9_site_of_plane_crash#0@g (#ordinal only for multiplicity landmarks: 0=bottom, 1=top; @g/@f = giver/follower map).

Reconstructing the marked transcripts

Because MapTask transcript text cannot be redistributed, the dialogue text is regenerated locally from your own corpus copy. scripts/reconstruct_transcripts.py reproduces the original RE-marked transcripts byte-for-byte (verified on all 128 dialogues).

  1. Download the HCRC Map Task Corpus v2.1 from https://groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/maptask/maptasknxt.html and unpack it. The per-side timed-units live in maptaskv2-1/Data/timed-units/ (files named <dialogue>.g.timed-units.xml / <dialogue>.f.timed-units.xml).

  2. Run:

    python scripts/reconstruct_transcripts.py \
      --maptask-tu-dir /path/to/maptaskv2-1/Data/timed-units \
      --out-dir ./transcripts_with_refs
    

    (--re-dir and --map-mapping default to the reference_expressions/ and assets/map_trans_mapping.txt files shipped here.)

Output lines look like:

[giver    ln:19  utt:13 ] pass well it's <<stony desert id:q1ec2.ref.4 lm:m9_stony_desert>> that's what i've got here

The script fills missing utt IDs, merges giver+follower timed-units, re-derives the unified timed_unit_ids, and inserts markers anchored on those IDs — so its output aligns exactly with the timed_unit_ids in this dataset.

Dataset statistics

Cascade attribute distribution across all 13,077 REs:

Attribute True False Null
is_quantificational 1,604 (12.3%) 11,473 (87.7%) 0
is_specified 11,137 (85.2%) 336 (2.6%) 1,604 (12.3%)
is_accommodated 10,977 (83.9%) 160 (1.2%) 1,940 (14.8%)
is_grounded 9,965 (76.2%) 1,012 (7.7%) 2,100 (16.1%)
is_imagined 632 (4.8%) 9,333 (71.4%) 3,112 (23.8%)

Understanding states (after lexical-variant unification):

Status Count %
aligned 9,435 72.1%
pending 3,403 26.0%
misunderstood 239 1.8%

Givers produce 8,679 REs (66.4%), followers 4,398 (33.6%).

Files in this repository

data/                        four Parquet configs (the loadable dataset)
raw/dialogues/               128 original per-dialogue annotation JSONs
raw/human_verified_subset/   3 gold-standard annotation JSONs
reference_expressions/       128 RE-extraction JSONs (timed_unit_ids etc.; used by reconstruction)
assets/                      landmark metadata (see below)
schema/                      annotation_output_schema.json, annotation_prompt_template.json
scripts/                     reconstruct_transcripts.py

Asset files (assets/)

  • landmarks_configuration.csv — metadata for all 267 landmarks (map presence, discrepancy types). Columns assim/sim/contr/omo are inherited from the original corpus, are not clearly documented, and are unused in our scheme; kept for completeness.
  • lexical_variant_landmark_info.json — the 10 lexical-variant landmark pairs.
  • multiplicity_landmark_position.json — the 16 multiplicity landmarks with instance positions (ordinal 0=lower, 1=upper).
  • map_trans_mapping.txt — map ID numeric suffix (m0m15) → its 8 dialogue IDs (space-separated).
  • dialogue_map_images.csv — dialogue ID → map ID and expected giver/follower map image filenames (e.g., map9g.png, map9f.png).

All asset files were processed from the original HCRC MapTask corpus by the authors.

The original MapTask corpus & licensing

This release contains derived annotations, structure, pointers, short RE strings, landmark metadata, and reconstruction code. The original HCRC MapTask corpus (audio, maps, full transcriptions) is available at https://groups.inf.ed.ac.uk/maptask/ under the corpus's own terms, which do not permit onward redistribution of the transcript text. Accordingly:

  • Our annotations, the landmark-metadata assets, prompt template, schema, map-image filename correspondence, and reconstruction code are released under CC-BY-4.0 (see LICENSE).
  • Full MapTask transcript text and map images are not included; obtain them from the link above and regenerate the marked transcripts locally with scripts/reconstruct_transcripts.py.

Please also cite and acknowledge the original HCRC MapTask corpus (Anderson et al., 1991).

Citation

If you use the GMMT dataset, please cite:

@inproceedings{li-etal-2026-grounded,
  title     = {Grounded Misunderstandings in Asymmetric Dialogue: A Perspectivist Annotation Scheme for MapTask},
  author    = {Li, Nan and Gatt, Albert and Poesio, Massimo},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2026)},
  month     = {May},
  year      = {2026},
  pages     = {4988--5001},
  address   = {Palma, Mallorca, Spain},
  publisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)},
  editor    = {Piperidis, Stelios and Bel, N{\'u}ria and van den Heuvel, Henk and Ide, Nancy and Krek, Simon and Toral, Antonio},
  doi       = {10.63317/59anbt78wyj7}
}

Preprint: arXiv:2511.03718.

License

CC-BY-4.0. See LICENSE. This license covers the released annotations and derived metadata; MapTask transcript text is not included and remains under the original corpus's terms.

Downloads last month
30

Paper for chnln/grounded-misunderstandings-in-maptask