|
|
--- |
|
|
dataset_info: |
|
|
features: |
|
|
- name: file_name |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: source_file |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: question |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: question_type |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: question_id |
|
|
dtype: int32 |
|
|
- name: answer |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
- name: answer_choices |
|
|
list: string |
|
|
- name: correct_choice_idx |
|
|
dtype: int32 |
|
|
- name: image |
|
|
dtype: image |
|
|
- name: video |
|
|
dtype: video |
|
|
- name: media_type |
|
|
dtype: string |
|
|
splits: |
|
|
- name: test |
|
|
num_bytes: 187015546578 |
|
|
num_examples: 102678 |
|
|
download_size: 175022245655 |
|
|
dataset_size: 187015546578 |
|
|
configs: |
|
|
- config_name: default |
|
|
data_files: |
|
|
- split: test |
|
|
path: data/test-* |
|
|
license: mit |
|
|
task_categories: |
|
|
- visual-question-answering |
|
|
language: |
|
|
- en |
|
|
size_categories: |
|
|
- 100K<n<1M |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
# OpenSeeSimE-Structural: Engineering Simulation Visual Question Answering Benchmark |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
OpenSeeSimE-Structural is a large-scale benchmark dataset for evaluating vision-language models on structural analysis simulation interpretation tasks. It contains over 100,000 question-answer pairs across parametrically-varied structural simulations including stress analysis, and deformation patterns. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
While vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promise in general visual reasoning, their effectiveness for specialized engineering simulation interpretation remains largely unexplored. This benchmark enables: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Statistically robust evaluation of VLM performance on engineering visualizations |
|
|
- Assessment across multiple reasoning capabilities (captioning, reasoning, grounding, relationship understanding) |
|
|
- Evaluation using different question types (binary classification, multiple-choice, spatial grounding) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Composition |
|
|
|
|
|
### Statistics |
|
|
- **Total instances**: 102,678 question-answer pairs |
|
|
- **Simulation types**: 5 structural models (Dog Bone, Hip Implant, Pressure Vessel, Beams, Wall Bracket) |
|
|
- **Parametric variations**: 1,024 unique instances per base model (4^5 parameter combinations) |
|
|
- **Question categories**: Captioning, Reasoning, Grounding, Relationship Understanding |
|
|
- **Question types**: Binary, Multiple-choice, Spatial grounding |
|
|
- **Media formats**: Both static images (1920×1440 PNG) and videos (Originally Extracted at: 200 frames, 29 fps, 7 seconds) |
|
|
|
|
|
### Simulation Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
Each base model varies across 5 parameters with 4 values each: |
|
|
|
|
|
**Dog Bone**: Length, Thickness, Diameter, Axial Load, Bending Load |
|
|
**Hip Implant**: Beam Length, Beam Diameter, Ball Diameter, Axial Load, Bending Load |
|
|
**Pressure Vessel**: Length, Thickness, Diameter, Material, Pressure |
|
|
**Thermal Beam**: Thickness, Bending Load, Young's Modulus, Tensile Yield Strength, Cross Section Shape |
|
|
**Wall Bracket**: Length, Width, Height, Thickness, Bending Force |
|
|
|
|
|
### Question Distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Binary Classification**: 40% (yes/no questions about symmetry, stress types, uniformity, etc.) |
|
|
- **Multiple-Choice**: 30% (4-option questions about deformation direction, stress dominance, magnitude ranges, etc.) |
|
|
- **Spatial Grounding**: 30% (location-based questions with labeled regions A/B/C/D) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Data Collection Process |
|
|
|
|
|
### Simulation Generation |
|
|
1. Base models sourced from Ansys Mechanical tutorial files |
|
|
2. Parametric automation via PyMechanical and PyGeometry interfaces |
|
|
3. Systematic variation across 5 parameters with 4 linearly-spaced values |
|
|
4. All simulations solved using finite element analysis with validated convergence settings |
|
|
|
|
|
### Ground Truth Extraction |
|
|
Automated extraction eliminates human annotation costs and ensures consistency: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Statistical Analysis**: Direct queries on result arrays (max, min, mean, std) |
|
|
- **Distribution Analysis**: Threshold-based classification using coefficient of variation |
|
|
- **Physics-Based Classification**: Stress tensor analysis and mechanics principles |
|
|
- **Spatial Localization**: Color-based region generation with computer vision algorithms |
|
|
|
|
|
All ground truth derived from numerical simulation results rather than visual interpretation. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Preprocessing and Data Format |
|
|
|
|
|
### Image Processing |
|
|
- Resolution: 1920×1440 pixels |
|
|
- Format: PNG with lossless compression |
|
|
- Standardized viewing orientations: front, back, left, right, top, bottom, isometric |
|
|
- Consistent color mapping: rainbow gradients (red=maximum, blue=minimum) |
|
|
- Automatic deformation scaling (1.5× relative to maximum dimension) |
|
|
|
|
|
### Video Processing |
|
|
- 200 frames at 29 fps (7 seconds duration) |
|
|
- Maximum deformation at frame 100 (temporal midpoint) |
|
|
- H.264 compression at 1920×1440 resolution |
|
|
- Uniform frame sampling for model input (32 frames) |
|
|
|
|
|
### Data Fields |
|
|
```python |
|
|
{ |
|
|
'file_name': str, # Unique identifier |
|
|
'source_file': str, # Base simulation model |
|
|
'question': str, # Question text |
|
|
'question_type': str, # 'Binary', 'Multiple Choice', or 'Spatial' |
|
|
'question_id': int, # Question identifier (1-20) |
|
|
'answer': str, # Ground truth answer |
|
|
'answer_choices': List[str], # Available options |
|
|
'correct_choice_idx': int, # Index of correct answer |
|
|
'image': Image, # PIL Image object (1920×1440) |
|
|
'video': Video, # Video frames |
|
|
'media_type': str # 'image' or 'video' |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## Labels |
|
|
|
|
|
All labels are automatically generated from simulation numerical results: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Binary questions**: "Yes" or "No" |
|
|
- **Multiple-choice**: Single letter (A/B/C/D) or descriptive option |
|
|
- **Spatial grounding**: Region label (A/B/C/D) corresponding to labeled visualization locations |
|
|
|
|
|
Label generation employs domain-specific thresholds: |
|
|
- Uniformity: CV ≤ 0.2 (20%) |
|
|
- Symmetry: 60% of node pairs within 10% tolerance (structural) |
|
|
- Spatial matching: 50-pixel separation for region placement |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Splits |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Test split only**: 102,678 instances |
|
|
- No train/validation splits provided (evaluation benchmark, not for model training) |
|
|
- Representative sampling across all simulation types and question categories |
|
|
|
|
|
## Intended Use |
|
|
|
|
|
### Primary Use Cases |
|
|
1. **Benchmark evaluation** of vision-language models on engineering simulation interpretation |
|
|
2. **Capability assessment** across visual reasoning dimensions (captioning, spatial grounding, relationship understanding) |
|
|
3. **Transfer learning analysis** from general-domain to specialized technical visual reasoning |
|
|
|
|
|
### Out-of-Scope Use |
|
|
- Real-time engineering decision-making without expert validation |
|
|
- Safety-critical applications without human oversight |
|
|
- Generalization to simulation types beyond structural mechanics |
|
|
|
|
|
## Limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
### Technical Limitations |
|
|
- **Objective tasks only**: Excludes subjective engineering judgments requiring domain expertise |
|
|
- **Single physics domain**: Structural mechanics only (see OpenSeeSimE-Fluid for fluid dynamics) |
|
|
- **Ansys-specific**: Visualizations generated using Ansys Mechanical rendering conventions |
|
|
- **Static parameters**: Fixed material properties and boundary conditions per instance |
|
|
- **2D visualizations**: All inputs are 2D projections of 3D simulations |
|
|
|
|
|
### Known Biases |
|
|
- **Color scheme dependency**: Questions exploit default rainbow gradient conventions |
|
|
- **Geometry bias**: Selected simulation types may not represent full diversity of structural analysis applications |
|
|
- **View orientation bias**: Standardized camera positions may not capture all critical simulation features |
|
|
|
|
|
## Ethical Considerations |
|
|
|
|
|
### Responsible Use |
|
|
- Models evaluated on this benchmark should NOT be deployed for safety-critical engineering decisions without expert validation |
|
|
- Automated interpretation should augment, not replace, human engineering expertise |
|
|
- Users should verify that benchmark performance translates to their specific simulation contexts |
|
|
|
|
|
### Data Privacy |
|
|
- All simulations contain no proprietary or confidential engineering data |
|
|
- No personal information collected |
|
|
- Publicly available tutorial files used as base models |
|
|
|
|
|
### Environmental Impact |
|
|
- Dataset generation required significant computational CPU resources |
|
|
- Consider environmental cost of large-scale model evaluation on this benchmark |
|
|
|
|
|
## License |
|
|
|
|
|
MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use with attribution |
|
|
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
|
|
If you use this dataset, please cite: |
|
|
|
|
|
```bibtex |
|
|
@article{ezemba2024opensesime, |
|
|
title={OpenSeeSimE: A Large-Scale Benchmark to Assess Vision-Language Model Question Answering Capabilities in Engineering Simulations}, |
|
|
author={Ezemba, Jessica and Pohl, Jason and Tucker, Conrad and McComb, Christopher}, |
|
|
year={2025} |
|
|
} |
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
|
|
## AI Usage Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Generation |
|
|
- **Simulation automation**: Python scripts with Ansys PyMechanical interface |
|
|
- **Ground truth extraction**: Automated computational protocols (no AI involvement) |
|
|
- **Quality validation**: Expert oversight of automated extraction procedures |
|
|
- **No generative AI** used in dataset creation, labeling, or curation |
|
|
|
|
|
### Visualization Generation |
|
|
- Ansys Mechanical rendering engine (deterministic, physics-based) |
|
|
- Standardized color mapping and camera controls |
|
|
- No AI-based image generation or enhancement |
|
|
|
|
|
## Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
**Authors**: Jessica Ezemba (jezemba@andrew.cmu.edu), Jason Pohl, Conrad Tucker, Christopher McComb |
|
|
**Institution**: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University |
|
|
|
|
|
## Acknowledgments |
|
|
|
|
|
- Ansys for providing simulation software and tutorial files |
|
|
- Carnegie Mellon University for computational resources |
|
|
- Reviewers and domain experts who validated the automated extraction protocols |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
**Version**: 1.0 |
|
|
**Last Updated**: December 2025 |
|
|
**Status**: Complete and stable |