metadata
license: other
task_categories:
- text-classification
- text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- peer-review
- scientific-papers
- iclr
- llm-evaluation
pretty_name: DeepReview-Bench
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
DeepReview-Bench
A benchmark for evaluating automatic (LLM) paper reviewers against human peer reviews. Each item is an ICLR submission paired with its human reviews; the ground truth for a paper is aggregated from its 3–4 human reviewers (rating 1–10; Soundness / Presentation / Contribution each 1–4; Accept/Reject decision).
Contents
papers/<paper_id>/:
| file | description |
|---|---|
paper.pdf |
original submission PDF |
paper.md |
cleaned Markdown conversion of the PDF (math $...$ and tables preserved) |
review.json |
human reviews: per-reviewer rating, soundness, presentation, contribution, strengths, weaknesses, etc. |
metadata.json |
title, venue, decision, dates |
figures/ |
figures extracted from the paper |
conversion_report.json |
(subset) automatic PDF→Markdown fidelity check |
Top-level:
splits/— evaluation splits:deepreview13k_test_dev.jsonl,..._dev_clean100.jsonl(version-consistency-filtered dev set),..._lite.jsonl,..._test.jsonl,all.jsonl.mismatch_flags.jsonl— per-paper flag for version mismatch: whether the human reviews describe an earlier paper version than the shippedpaper.md(added/revised content after rebuttal). Tags:mismatch/clean/unaudited.markdown_manifest.jsonl,pdf_manifest.jsonl,markdown_clean_manifest.jsonl— provenance manifests.
Known caveats
- Version mismatch. A meaningful fraction of papers have human reviews that
describe an earlier arXiv/OpenReview version than the
paper.mdshipped here (rebuttal-revised content).splits/..._dev_clean100.jsonlis a dev subset selected to be version-consistent, but its retained papers were audited heuristically and a small number of residual mismatches remain — treatmismatch_flags.jsonlas the audited signal and re-verify if you need a perfectly clean subset. - Copyright. PDFs are the authors' original submissions and remain under their respective rights; redistributed here for research evaluation only.
License
Set the appropriate license before relying on this card. The papers are third-party academic works; the benchmark packaging is released for research use.