<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> stringlengths 355 1.02k |
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``` [/INST] Premis... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``` ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argumen... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument, since if a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Prem... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument, because if a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Pr... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument, as if a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing the... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then th... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the a... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is mi... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is miss... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat i... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's pet cat is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's pet cat is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then t... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's pet cat is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the ar... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is mi... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missin... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If lau... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing t... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet ca... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's pet cat is not missing, since if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's pet cat is not missing, because if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missi... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's pet cat is not missing, as if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing th... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, so it can be concluded that the arson occur... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/I... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, which implies that the arson occurred on el... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, which shows that the arson occurred on elm ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, which establishes that the arson occurred o... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect.``` [... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect.```... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect.``` [/IN... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the s... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a fingerprint on the murder weap... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the sus... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a fingerprint on the murder weapon does n... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a fingerprint on the murder weapon do... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect, since if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect, because if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on el... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect, as if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm str... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Pr... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Pre... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premi... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.`... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.```... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm stre... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Pre... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] P... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premis... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.`... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura had not recently changed the lo... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/IN... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura had not recently changed the locks on he... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura had not recently changed the locks on her ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura had not recently changed the locks o... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors, since if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors, because if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors, as if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INS... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: I... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If j... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST]... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] P... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/I... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis has a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis has a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis has a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If jo... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INS... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis does not have a history of viol... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis does not have a history of violent behav... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis does not have a history of violent behavio... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis does not have a history of violent b... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis does not have a history of violent behavior, since if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis does not have a history of violent behavior, because if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/IN... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis does not have a history of violent behavior, as if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] P... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was fou... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was foun... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If ... |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was found ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.