<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> stringlengths 355 1.02k |
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street and the apple is red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street and the apple is red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street and the apple is red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the apple is not red.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The apple is not red, since if the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The apple is not red, because if the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The apple is not red, as if the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The apple is not red
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is tall, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street and the tree is tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street and the tree is tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street and the tree is tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is tall
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the tree is not tall.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The tree is not tall, since if the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The tree is not tall, because if the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The tree is not tall, as if the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is tall then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not tall
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is black, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is black
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not black.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not black, since if the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not black, because if the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not black, as if the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is black then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not black
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking, since if the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking, because if the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking, as if the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.