Search is not available for this dataset
If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. stringlengths 74 421 | If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street stringlengths 36 192 | Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 788 values | The arson occurred on Elm Street stringclasses 788 values | modus ponen stringclasses 2 values | Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 394 values | The arson occurred on Elm Street.1 stringclasses 394 values | Officer Smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene stringclasses 394 values | The arson did not occur on Elm Street stringclasses 394 values | True bool 1 class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars, since if the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars, because if the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars, as if the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | modus tollen | The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street and officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | Officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby, since if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby, because if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby, as if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | modus tollen | Officer Ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery, since if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery, because if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery, as if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | modus tollen | The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits, since if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits, because if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
A homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits, as if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | modus tollen | A homeless man named Charlie claims to have seen the culprits | The arson occurred on Elm Street | A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, so the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, since if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, because if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The arson occurred on elm street, as if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees, since if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees, because if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
The store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees, as if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street. | If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the arson occurred on elm street | The arson did not occur on elm street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | modus tollen | The store owner, Richard Anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson occurred on Elm Street | The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street. | If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the arson occurred on elm street | Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, hence the arson occurred on elm street. | If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the arson occurred on elm street | Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, thus the arson occurred on elm street. | If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the arson occurred on elm street | Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson occurred on Elm Street | modus ponen | Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson occurred on Elm Street | Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house | The arson did not occur on Elm Street | true |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.