| license: apache-2.0 | |
| pretty_name: "GSPC-OSS — open-source licence reasoning (v2)" | |
| tags: [ai-governance, benchmark, open-source, licensing, measurement] | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: default | |
| data_files: | |
| - split: train | |
| path: items.jsonl | |
| # GSPC-OSS v2 — licence reasoning, not licence trivia | |
| **n = 16 public** (+ 8 held out privately). v1 was DEAD (5/7 models ceilinged): | |
| it asked recitable facts. v2 asks the cases that need reasoning about the licence's **trigger** and | |
| **scope** — copyleft on distribution vs internal use; AGPL's network trigger only when other users | |
| exist; directional compatibility (Apache-2→GPL-3 yes, GPL-2-only+Apache-2 no); "open weights" ≠ OSI-open | |
| (Llama MAU cap, RAIL prohibited uses, SSPL/ELv2/BSL service clauses); Apache NOTICE retention; CC BY-ND. | |
| Grader asks PERMITTED / RESTRICTED. Ground truth follows FSF/OSI positions and is stated defensibly, so | |
| this is a fair discrimination test. Authored (Apache-2.0), guard-clean, canary'd, private held-out split. | |
| Whether it discriminates is the board's call — author → measure → iterate, published either way. | |