id int64 4 458k | target_text stringlengths 33 45.8k ⌀ | verdict stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
99,002 | Knowing and/or Willful Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227, et seq.) on behalf of Autodialer Class Knowing and/or Willful Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227, et seq. and 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.1200(d)) on behalf of the NDNC Class Statutory Violations of the... | lose |
138,068 | 17. Defendants operate an electrical construction and maintenance business, whose customers are primarily or exclusively local electric power utilities. 18. Defendants provide construction and maintenance services on a power utility’s distribution systems. 19. During the past three years, at any given time,... | win |
319,755 | (Fair Labor Standards Act Violations) (Violations of Ohio Revised Code 4111.03) 18. Defendants are home health care businesses. 19. Plaintiff La’Shauna Purse has been employed by Defendants since March 2017. 20. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff was employed by Defendants as a home health aide. 21. ... | win |
155,208 | 37. As set forth below, the proposed Class satisfies the requirements for a class action. 39. Plaintiff is a member of the Class he seeks to represent, as detailed in the factual background and the claims for relief section of this complaint. The averments of fact and questions of law are common to the Class. ... | win |
390,338 | 24. Named Plaintiffs and Class Members were employed by Defendants at call centers in New York and elsewhere in the United States. 25. Throughout their tenures, named Plaintiffs and Class Members worked hours for which they were not paid, including hours worked in excess of forty (40) in a week. 27. Named Plaintiffs ... | win |
235,263 | 12. On Whitepages alone, just on one spoofed phone number that Zip Capital Group uses 954-204-0916, there are over 500 spam reports. 13. On October 16, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Plaintiff received a phone call to his cell phone number from Defendant using phone number 480-653-8635. Phone number 480-653- 8635 is a spoofe... | win |
206,459 | 10. When the Plaintiff REBECCA WOLCOTT began working with the Defendants she was told that she would be paid $10.00 per hour for all work and Plaintiff agreed to be hired at that rate. 12. The Defendant LISA HERRGUTH were at all times material hereto, an owner, officer, manager, and/or employee of the Defendant ... | lose |
405,917 | 23. A cryptocurrency is a digital asset designed to work as a medium of exchange or a store of value or both. Cryptocurrencies leverage a variety of cryptographic principles to secure transactions, control the creation of additional units, and verify the transfer of the underlying digital assets. 24. Bitcoin wa... | lose |
113,910 | 1.5 times the regular rates for which they were employed. 31. Frontier is a provider of inspection services to pipelines, pipeline stations, terminals, gathering, utilities, tank storage and other energy related fields. 33. Rivera provided pipeline inspection services to Kinder-Morgan, Inc. in the Riverside a... | lose |
18,074 | (“Unfair” Business Practices in Violation of the Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.—On Behalf of All Classes) (“Unlawful” Business Practices in Violation of the Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.—On Behalf of All Classes) 22. A phishing attack is a sche... | win |
67,347 | 73. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all allegations in all preceding paragraphs. | win |
63,042 | 26. Plaintiff brings this class action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, under Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(1)-23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for Defendant’s violations of the TCPA and FDCPA. 27. Plaintiff seeks to represent a class of thousands of individuals (“the TCPA Class”)... | win |
309,232 | 66. Named Plaintiff seeks to bring this suit to recover overtime compensation and liquidated damages from Defendants under the applicable provisions of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §216(b), on their own behalf as well as on behalf of those in the following collective: FLSA Collective: Current and former employees of Defend... | win |
170,886 | CitetheU.S. Civil StatuteundeTv/hich\ousa'efilwg(DoiiotciteJurisdictionalst<i{utesuttless<iiversity}: 28 U.S:C. §1332(d)(2)(A) Briefdescription ofcause: Breach of contract, unjust enrichment, class action | lose |
197,432 | (On behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 78. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein. 79. Defendants and their agents made unsolicited text message calls to cellular telephone numbers belonging to Plaintiff and the other members of the Class en masse without the... | win |
358,330 | (Declaratory Relief Pursuant To 28 U.S.C §2201) 23. On August 21, 2015 Plaintiff Cowen’s minor son, Jarrett Cowen sustained an injury which required medical attention. He was transported by ambulance to the emergency room at Lake Regional Hospital, Osage Beach, Missouri. The medical personal at Lake Regional rec... | lose |
455,680 | 20. Defendant is a homeopathic products company, and owns and operates the website, www.hylands.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services and which Defendant ensures the delivery of such goods throughout the United States, including New York State. 21... | lose |
245,890 | (Breach of the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) (Declaratory Judgment) (Violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act) 12. The Google Play Store (“Google Play”) is one of the largest retailers of digital content in the world. Google Play sells all varieties of digital content (e.g., music, movi... | lose |
74,639 | 17. Rice Energy is an oil and natural gas company operating primarily in Pennsylvania and Ohio in the Marcellus, Utica, and Upper Devonian Shales and employs oilfield personnel to carry out its work. 18. Many of these individuals worked for Rice Energy performing the same or substantially similar job duties as P... | win |
359,171 | 17. In June 2007, Defendant FitFlop Ltd. began selling the FitFlop Footwear in the United States. At the same time, Defendant launched a major advertising campaign to promote FitFlop Footwear. 18. FitFlop Limited, Brand Slam, and Marcia Kilgore produced, designed, advertised, sold and marketed FitFlop Footwear ... | lose |
31,242 | 25. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of itself and a class of all others similarly situated. This action is brought and is properly maintained as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), (b)(2), and (b)(3). 26. Plaintiff seeks to represent a class (“Class”) defined as follows: All individuals an... | lose |
31,612 | INJUNCTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF NEW YORK GENERAL BUSINESS LAW § 349 (DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT) (brought on behalf of the Nationwide Class, in conjunction with the substantively similar consumer protection laws of other states and the District of Columbia to the extent New York consumer protection laws... | lose |
188,971 | 26. Definition of Class. The class consists of all individuals who: a. Are Medicaid recipients with an intellectual or developmental disability; b. Need an institutional level of care provided in a Medicaid-certified ICF in the State of Washington; and c. Qualify for and desire DDA home and community-based ... | win |
149,536 | 11. Reimer Law denies for want of knowledge the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of Plaintiff's Complaint. 3 12. Reimer Law admits that Mr. White co-signed several student loans for which his son was the Borrower and denies for want of knowledge the remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of Plaint... | lose |
41,741 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | lose |
65,800 | 10. Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone number (214)659-5024 and (954)780-8831confirmed to be Defendant’s number. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 19. Plaintiff brings this action individually a... | lose |
288,839 | 13. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, the subscriber of the cellular telephone number (267) ***-1810 (the “1810 Number”). The 1810 Number is, and at all times mentioned herein was, assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 33. Class Definition. ... | win |
76,809 | MediCopy offers a FREE encrypted portal for the secure delivery of protected health information. If interested, please email contact@medicopy.net. √ FREE Release of Information Services √ FREE Disability/FMLA Form Completion Exhibit A. The Faxes provide no ... | lose |
286,560 | 11. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, “persons” as defined by 47 41. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 43. PSI and its employees or agents are ... | lose |
60,862 | 10. Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone numbers confirmed to be Defendant’s number. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 20. Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of all others si... | win |
122,306 | 11. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 13. The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Defendants and those companies and entities on whose behalf they attempt to collect and/or have purchased debts. 1... | win |
50,800 | 35. Upon information and belief, Defendants’ Spring term began with the first day of classes on or about January 13, 2020.5 36. Upon information and belief, Defendants’ Spring term was scheduled to conclude with the last day of classes on April 28, 2020 and exams taking place April 30th through May 6th.6 37. Acc... | lose |
236,535 | 10. The Mortgage secured the purchase of Plaintiff’s personal residence located at 2227 Harbor Drive, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804. USDC IN/ND case 1:19-cv-00129-HAB-SLC document 1 filed 03/29/19 page 2 of 11 3 11. The Mortgage secured the repayment of the indebtedness evidenced by a promissory note in the am... | win |
442,596 | (Declaratory Relief) 112. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 111 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 113. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | lose |
381,138 | 40. The allegations in all previous paragraphs are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth here. 41. Defendants owed a duty to all Plaintiffs and Class Members to exercise reasonable care in the manufacture and distribution of the Sleeper. 42. Defendants had a heightened duty of care to all Plainti... | lose |
44,353 | (Violation of New York State Civil Rights Law, NY CLS Civ R, Article 4 (CLS Civ R § 40 et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York subclass) (Violation of New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law, Article 15 (Executive Law § 292 et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York subclass) (Violation of New... | lose |
420,223 | 15. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 35. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein. 36. The foregoing acts and omissions of Defendant constitute numerou... | win |
233,869 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | lose |
358,300 | (Breach of Contract – By Plaintiff on behalf of the Class, against Defendant and Does 1-100) (Negligent Misrepresentation – By Plaintiff on behalf of the Class, against Defendant and Does 1-100) (Unjust Enrichment/Quasi Contract – By Plaintiff on behalf of the Class, against Defendant and Does 1-100) (Violati... | lose |
413,741 | (Overtime Compensation Due Under 29 U.S.C. § 207) 26. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 25 above and incorporates them here by reference. 28. Specifically, Defendant failed to properly compensate Plaintiff and similarly situated current and former employees for all overtime hours worked through its cus... | win |
70,629 | 1. The amount of the debt; 10. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 11. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant Harris sent an initial collection letter; c. attempting to... | win |
260,014 | 23. Plaintiffs bring this action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, as a member of the four proposed classes (hereafter, jointly, “The Classes”). 24. The class concerning the ATDS claim for no prior express consent (hereafter “The ATDS Class”) is defined as follows: All persons within... | win |
325 | 5.1 Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following classes, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 5.2 The Class consists of: (a) All individuals with addresses in the state of Washington; (b) Who were sued by Portfolio in a Washington Court; (c) In a case where Portfolio was represented by ... | lose |
93,519 | 11. Plaintiff was employed as a Collector for Enova from September 2012 through August 2016. 12. During her employment, Plaintiff regularly worked forty (40) hours or more per week. 13. During the period beginning June 7, 2014 and continuing through the present, Enova failed to pay Plaintiff and other emplo... | win |
32,468 | (FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT: UNPAID OVERTIME WAGES) (Brought on Behalf of Plaintiff and All Collective Action Members) (PENNSYLVANIA MINIMUM WAGE ACT: UNPAID OVERTIME WAGES) (Brought on Behalf of Plaintiff and All Members of the PMWA Class) 15. Defendant PrimeCare employed Plaintiff Kathy Moore and the Collective... | win |
407,078 | 24. Despite this difficulty and risk, Plaintiff plans to return to Defendant’s facilities, as she lives near and visits Defendant’s facilities for goods and services. Specifically, Plaintiff visits Defendant’s facilities in order to purchase boxes and other supplies for moving and storage. Furthermore, Plaintiff i... | lose |
187,588 | 1. Whether Defendant’s employees and agents such as managers, bell staff, doormen, concierges, transportation providers, security personnel, front desk and other staff are trained to assist blind and vision-impaired guests with basic needs such as: completing the hotel registration; learning about and completing ser... | win |
266,588 | 16. On or about May 29, 2013 at approximately 6:20 p.m. PST, Defendants contacted Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 4164 via an “automatic telephone dialing system” (“ATDS”), as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1), as prohibited by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 17. This ATDS has the capacity to... | lose |
234,415 | 12. In or about February 2001, Mazzei instituted the Mazzei Action against HomEq. 13. The lawsuit instituted by Mr. Mazzei in February 2001 was extraordinarily lengthy. Judge John Sprizzo, the original federal judge assigned to the case, did not permit discovery on the state claims raised by Mazzei until 2006,... | lose |
354,874 | 10. In order for Defendant LoanCare to place autodialed and/or prerecorded calls to consumers, it must have prior express consent before it may place such calls to a consumer. 11. Yet in violation of this rule, Defendant fails to obtain consent prior to making autodialed and/or prerecorded collection calls to cel... | lose |
305,563 | 16. Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a construction worker. Plaintiffs’ primary duty was to travel to job sites in Defendant’s company truck and complete heavy construction work using rigs, cement, and steel. 17. From the beginning of Plaintiff’s employment to present, Defendant paid Plaintiff an hourly rate of ... | win |
20,807 | Breach of Express Warranty 190. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in all foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 191. Defendant provided the Plaintiff and Class Members an express warranty in the form of written and oral affirmations of fact, on t... | lose |
217,593 | 1. Maltodextrins, GMO Compass, http://www.gmo- compass.org/eng/database/ingredients/148.maltodextrins.html (last visited Jan. 9, 2014). 2. See id. 28. Defendant manufactures, distributes, markets, advertises, and sells the Products aforementioned in paragraph one (1) throughout the State of California and i... | lose |
416,081 | 17. Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. holds itself out to the public as a manufacturer of safe, cutting-edge, and easy-to-use home appliances, including washing machines. Defendant is in the business of manufacturing, producing, distributing, and/or selling washing machines throughout the United States. 19. De... | win |
141,239 | 14. Defendants made (or had made on their behalf) telephone calls to Plaintiff’s and the members of the Classes’ telephones without consent. Defendants have made thousands of calls through the phone numbers (302) 394-6888, (954) 334-3110, and (305) 260-6112, among others. 15. In making unsolicited calls to the ... | win |
431,489 | 11. On or about November 27, 2018, Defendant sent an unsolicited facsimile to Plaintiff using a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device. A copy of the facsimile is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 12. Exhibit A is an invitation to an educational program to discuss the sacroiliac joint as a cause of ... | lose |
343,232 | 1 5. Plaintiff and others similarly situated worked as employees for Sprint. 17. Plaintiff and others similarly situated had or have the primary duty of servicing wireless communication equipment for individuals and small businesses. The FLSA requires covered employers, such as Sprint, to compensate all non- exempt em... | win |
178,285 | 20. Plaintiff seeks to bring this suit to recover from Defendants unpaid overtime compensation and liquidated damages pursuant to the applicable provisions of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), individually, on his own behalf, as well as on behalf of those in the following collective: Current and former hourly employee... | win |
330,312 | 15. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 16. Beginning in or around November of 2018, Plaintiff began receiving numerous autodialed and pre-recorded calls on her cellular phone ((XXX) XXX-2511) from ARM. When Plaintiff did not pick up the phone, ARM l... | win |
87,446 | 10. While certain types of calls may be within the letter of the law for calls placed to landline (“wireline”) telephones, the same calls to cellular (“wireless”) telephones violate the 1 http://greaterstcloudjobspot.com/company/2497/New-Partners-Teleservices/ 2 https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/195027197 3 http:... | lose |
354,813 | 23. The California class may be appropriately maintained as a class action under Rule 23 because all of the prerequisites set forth under Rule 23 are met. 24. Members of the California class are so numerous that joinder of all such members is impracticable. Although exact size of the California class is unknow... | lose |
35,977 | 10. Plaintiffs bring a collective action against their former employers for unpaid wages and overtime compensation owed to them and all other similarly situated employees, current and former, of Defendants’ who worked for the Defendants, at any time during the three year period before this Complaint was filed up to ... | win |
451,921 | 103. This action is brought as a class action. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 104. With respect to the Plaintiff's Class, this claim is brought on behalf of a class of; (a) all per... | win |
329,827 | (Against All Defendants for Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 Promulgated Thereunder) (Against All Defendants for Violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and 17 C.F.R. § 244.100 Promulgated Thereunder) (Against the Individual Defendants for Violations of Section 20(a) of the... | lose |
280,519 | (Collective Action Alleging FLSA Violations) (Virgin Islands FLSA Class Action) 33. From May 2019 until December 2019, Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as a laborer in the Virgin Islands. 34. Throughout the time Plaintiff was employed by Defendant, Defendant paid Plaintiff and those similarly situated “str... | lose |
173,655 | (Declaratory Relief) Plaintiff incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 86 of this (Violation of 17 U.S.C. §1202) Plaintiff incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 68 of this 10. organizations. CoreLogic represents that its data includes more than 3.3 billion 11. property and financ... | lose |
352,764 | 14. The front labels of the Products represent that they are free of preservatives. But all of the Products contain one or more of the preservatives citric acid, phosphoric acid, and ascorbic acid. 15. By representing that the Products have “No Preservatives,” Defendants sought to capitalize on consumers’ prefe... | lose |
66,665 | 10. After Triage placed Mr. Kwiatkowski at Exeter Hospital, Plaintiffs French, Cross, Jordan and Burke underwent procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratory at Exeter Hospital and were exposed to hepatitis C by Mr. Kwiatkowski. 11. Upon information and belief, prior to arriving at Exeter Hospital, staff ... | lose |
375,766 | 10. Defendant contacted Plaintiff on or around July 2018 in an effort to solicit its business. 11. Defendant’s messages constituted “telephone solicitation” as defined by the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(4) and “unsolicited advertisement” as defined by the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(5). 12. Defendant used an “telep... | lose |
284,045 | (42 U.S.C. §1981) 10. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires employers to complete and maintain a Form I-9 for each of their employees, whether such employees are U.S. citizens or noncitizens. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324A. 11. Both employees and employers must complete Form I-9. An employee must prov... | win |
238,780 | 10. Defendant told Plaintiff that she still owed the debt. 11. Defendant had no legal basis to demand payment from payment, because the account had been fully satisfied as per the March 18, 2014 Satisfaction of Judgment filed in St. Louis County. 12. Upon information and belief, it is Defendant’s routine practi... | win |
412,408 | 23. Defendant owns, operates and/or controls its restaurants, sells store gift cards to the public, and uses them as a form of communication. One or more of its restaurants is located in New York City. Defendant’s restaurants constitute places of public accommodation. Defendant’s restaurants provide important goods... | lose |
33,978 | 11. CCI operates and maintains a website which describes its business as “[s]upplying award-winning, mobile field service technicians” that CCI can “immediately deploy.” 12. CCI relies on Technicians, such as Plaintiffs, who install, service and repair Dish Network satellite TV and Internet services throughout th... | lose |
270,646 | 17. This action is properly maintainable as a collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). 18. This action is brought on behalf of Plaintiff and a putative collective consisting of similarly situated employees who performed work for Defendants. 20. The claims of the Plaintiff... | lose |
196,158 | 21. Defendant is a children’s products and accessories company that owns and operates the website, www.munchkin.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 2... | lose |
232,177 | 12. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was the sole operator, possessor, and subscriber of the cellular telephone number ending in 7679. 13. At all times relevant, Plaintiff’s number ending in 7679 was assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 14. At all times relev... | win |
76,214 | 10. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the Debt”). 11. The Debt was primarily for personal, family or household purposes and is therefore a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 12. Sometime after the incurrence of the Debt, Plaintiff fell behind on payments owed. 13. Thereafter, at an exact ... | win |
390,352 | 1. Goins currently resides in Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana. 10. Restaurant Employer has intentionally, knowingly, and with reckless disregard violated Goins and all server employees’ rights to tips paid by customers with credit cards and debit cards. Goins is expressly alleging that Restaurant Employer h... | win |
123,253 | (Violation of New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law, Article 15 (Executive Law § 292 et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York subclass) (Violation of New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-102, et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York subclass) (Violation of New York... | lose |
337,551 | 15. Defendants made many of the calls using the outbound phone number (732) 362- 0402, among others. 16. The call recipients, like Plaintiffs, include, but may not be limited to, former subscribers of one or more Gannett newspapers; however, their subscriptions were cancelled or expired, and they have chosen to ... | lose |
171,203 | (for the California and Nationwide Classes) 135. Representative Plaintiff incorporates in this cause of action every allegation of the preceding paragraphs, with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. 136. Representative Plaintiff and members of each of the classes hereby demand an accounting... | lose |
219,361 | 65. Plaintiff re-states, re-alleges and incorporates herein by reference, paragraphs one (1) through one sixty-four (64) as if set forth fully in this cause of action. 66. This cause of action is brought on behalf of Plaintiff and the members of a class. 68. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, a cla... | win |
395,690 | 19. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, the subscriber of the cellular telephone number ending 9701 (the “9701 Number”). The 9701 Number is, and at all times mentioned herein was, assigned to a cellular telephone service as specified in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 20. At no time did Plaintif... | lose |
442,895 | 16. Defendant has alleged that, sometime prior to August 21, 2012, ALCANTARA incurred a financial obligation (“ALCANTARA DEBT”) to Citibank South Dakota, N.A./Home Depot. 17. Defendant has alleged that Jackson Capital, Inc. (“JACKSON”), a New Jersey for-profit corporation, purchased the ALCANTARA DEBT. 18. De... | lose |
126,094 | 11. On February 6, 2015, Plaintiff JEREMY MEYERS received from Defendant at one of its retail establishments located at 501 Packerland Drive, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54303, a computer-generated cash register receipt which displayed more than the last five digits of the Plaintiff’s credit card number as well as the car... | lose |
106,482 | 1. BreaCh of Contract 1. For waiting time penalties pursuant to Labor Code § 203; m. For statutory penalties according to proof; -17- 16. Plaintiffs, Bernadette Pauley and Thomas Clark are actors and comedians who were hired to work on the television show Comedy.TV in approximately May and August of 2009. The sho... | win |
314,166 | ACTION Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2) Brief description of cause: Violation of Minn. Stat. § 325E.64, Negligence | win |
303,011 | 22. Defendant NRA is a membership organization focused on firearms education, training, and advocacy. 23. The NRA has a sister organization, The NRA Foundation, which is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, organized and existing under the laws of the District of Columbia.2 24. This is an important distinction, as th... | win |
198,668 | (Declaratory Relief) 112. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 111 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 113. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | lose |
451,034 | 23. Williams claims that “For more than a century, [Williams] has provided valuable energy infrastructure that Americans count on every day. [Williams] has a long successful history of doing things right—[Williams] doesn’t take shortcuts and [Williams] treats people, the environment, and communities with respect.”1... | lose |
83,523 | 39. Valley Forge’s common stock was publicly traded on the OTCBB market at all relevant times. Defendants’ material misrepresentations, omissions and manipulative contrivances had the effect of artificially inflating the price of Valley Forge’s common stock and warrants. 43. Defendants made each misrepresentati... | lose |
319,619 | 29. Defendant offers the commercial website, https://www.sterling.edu/, to the public. The website offers features which should allow all prospective students to access the services offered by the Defendant. The services offered by Defendant include, but are not limited to, the following: which allow students the abili... | lose |
258,360 | 13. Plaintiff brings claims, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”) Rule 23, individually and on behalf of the following consumer class (the “Class”) consisting of: a) All consumers who have an address in the state of Alabama b) who were sent a collection letter from the Defendant ... | win |
396,098 | 10. In 1991, Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (TCPA), in response to a growing number of consumer complaints regarding certain telemarketing practices. 11. The TCPA regulates, among other things, the use of automated telephone dialing systems, or “autodialers.” The plain l... | win |
406,423 | (Declaratory Relief) 115. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 114 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 116. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | lose |
194,591 | 25. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the above paragraphs as though fully set forth therein. 26. Defendant RCA is an “employer” and Plaintiffs and “employees” under the FLSA. 27. Defendant Lahasky is the Chief Executive Officer of RCA. He is involved in the day-to-day operation of RCA and has the authority to h... | win |
397,046 | (On behalf of Plaintiff individually) (On behalf of Plaintiff and Class) 1. Many employers require job applicants to complete a background check successfully prior to extending an offer of employment. 11. In August 2020, Stuffed Puffs refused to hire Mr. Minielly based solely on criminal history record inform... | win |
136,983 | 2.1 Longshore workers include workers who are classified for II. A. Longshore Seniority, Work, and Work Assignments MARLENA ROSS, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. | win |
73,103 | 10. Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone numbers (559) 291-8452 and (947) 756-3421 confirmed to be Defendant’s number. 19. Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, as a member the two proposed classes (hereafter, jointly, “The Class... | win |
29,552 | 6.12 Plaintiff and the Class Members were at all times “non-exempt” employees and eligible to receive overtime pay pursuant to Section 207 of the FLSA. 6.14 Plaintiff and the Class Members worked/work over forty hours per work week and Defendant fails/failed to pay Plaintiff and the Class Members any overtime co... | win |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.