datht/ace-generated-dataset · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 9 47	title stringlengths 9 47	content listlengths 5 160	events listlengths 1 80	negative_triggers listlengths 0 0	doc_idx int64 0 528
CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00	CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00	[ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-0", "sentence": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00", "tokens": [ "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-1", "sentence": "STORY", "tokens": [ "STORY" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-2", "sentence": "2003 - 03 - 03T19:00:00 - 05:00", "tokens": [ "2003", "-", "03", "-", "03T19:00:00", "-", "05:00" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-3", "sentence": "New Questions About Attacking Iraq ; Is Torturing Terrorists Necessary ?", "tokens": [ "New", "Questions", "About", "Attacking", "Iraq", ";", "Is", "Torturing", "Terrorists", "Necessary", "?" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-4", "sentence": "BEGALA Well , we 'll debate that later on in the show .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "Well", ",", "we", "'ll", "debate", "that", "later", "on", "in", "the", "show", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-5", "sentence": "We 'll have a couple of experts come out , so I 'll withhold my comments until then .", "tokens": [ "We", "'ll", "have", "a", "couple", "of", "experts", "come", "out", ",", "so", "I", "'ll", "withhold", "my", "comments", "until", "then", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-6", "sentence": "Even as the secretary of homeland security was putting his people on high alert last month , a 30-foot Cuban patrol boat with four heavily armed men landed on American shores , utterly undetected by the Coast Guard Secretary Ridge now leads .", "tokens": [ "Even", "as", "the", "secretary", "of", "homeland", "security", "was", "putting", "his", "people", "on", "high", "alert", "last", "month", ",", "a", "30-foot", "Cuban", "patrol", "boat", "with", "four", "heavily", "armed", "men", "landed", "on", "American", "shores", ",", "utterly", "undetected", "by", "the", "Coast", "Guard", "Secretary", "Ridge", "now", "leads", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-7", "sentence": "Now , why has our president placed homeland security in the hands of Republican political hacks instead of professionals , by the way ? Attorney General John Ashcroft , for example , is a career politician .", "tokens": [ "Now", ",", "why", "has", "our", "president", "placed", "homeland", "security", "in", "the", "hands", "of", "Republican", "political", "hacks", "instead", "of", "professionals", ",", "by", "the", "way", "?", "Attorney", "General", "John", "Ashcroft", ",", "for", "example", ",", "is", "a", "career", "politician", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-8", "sentence": "He lost an election to a dead man .", "tokens": [ "He", "lost", "an", "election", "to", "a", "dead", "man", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-9", "sentence": "Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge is another career politician who was passed over by Mr. Bush for the vice presidency .", "tokens": [ "Secretary", "of", "Homeland", "Security", "Tom", "Ridge", "is", "another", "career", "politician", "who", "was", "passed", "over", "by", "Mr.", "Bush", "for", "the", "vice", "presidency", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-10", "sentence": "And Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Asa Hutchinson is yet another career politician and a graduate of the disgraceful Bob Jones University .", "tokens": [ "And", "Deputy", "Secretary", "of", "Homeland", "Security", "Asa", "Hutchinson", "is", "yet", "another", "career", "politician", "and", "a", "graduate", "of", "the", "disgraceful", "Bob", "Jones", "University", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-11", "sentence": "Apparently , Mr. Bush only turns to professionals when it 's really important , like political consulting .", "tokens": [ "Apparently", ",", "Mr.", "Bush", "only", "turns", "to", "professionals", "when", "it", "'s", "really", "important", ",", "like", "political", "consulting", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-12", "sentence": "NOVAK Paul , as I understand your definition of a political -- of a professional politician based on that is somebody who is elected to public office .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Paul", ",", "as", "I", "understand", "your", "definition", "of", "a", "political", "--", "of", "a", "professional", "politician", "based", "on", "that", "is", "somebody", "who", "is", "elected", "to", "public", "office", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-13", "sentence": "Now in your administration , the Clinton administration , there were these members of the cabinet who by your definition were professional politicians -- Lloyd Bentsen , Les Aspin , William S. Cohen , Janet Reno , Bruce Babbitt , Mike Espy , Dan Glickman , Norman Mineta , Henry Cisneros , Federico Pena , Bill Richardson , Richard Riley , 12 of them , not to mention former Democratic National Chairman Ron Brown , and one of the great professional politicians of all time , Bill Daly .", "tokens": [ "Now", "in", "your", "administration", ",", "the", "Clinton", "administration", ",", "there", "were", "these", "members", "of", "the", "cabinet", "who", "by", "your", "definition", "were", "professional", "politicians", "--", "Lloyd", "Bentsen", ",", "Les", "Aspin", ",", "William", "S.", "Cohen", ",", "Janet", "Reno", ",", "Bruce", "Babbitt", ",", "Mike", "Espy", ",", "Dan", "Glickman", ",", "Norman", "Mineta", ",", "Henry", "Cisneros", ",", "Federico", "Pena", ",", "Bill", "Richardson", ",", "Richard", "Riley", ",", "12", "of", "them", ",", "not", "to", "mention", "former", "Democratic", "National", "Chairman", "Ron", "Brown", ",", "and", "one", "of", "the", "great", "professional", "politicians", "of", "all", "time", ",", "Bill", "Daly", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-14", "sentence": "BEGALA And you know what , they did a hell of a job for our country .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "And", "you", "know", "what", ",", "they", "did", "a", "hell", "of", "a", "job", "for", "our", "country", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-15", "sentence": "And these bozos let four armed Cubans land on our shores when they 're trying to make a high terrorist alert .", "tokens": [ "And", "these", "bozos", "let", "four", "armed", "Cubans", "land", "on", "our", "shores", "when", "they", "'re", "trying", "to", "make", "a", "high", "terrorist", "alert", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-16", "sentence": "Our president has put homeland security in the hands of failed Republican hacks .", "tokens": [ "Our", "president", "has", "put", "homeland", "security", "in", "the", "hands", "of", "failed", "Republican", "hacks", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-17", "sentence": "Hire professionals , Mr. President .", "tokens": [ "Hire", "professionals", ",", "Mr.", "President", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-18", "sentence": "NOVAK So it 's OK -- it 's OK to have professional politicians at the Justice Department and the Pentagon ...", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "So", "it", "'s", "OK", "--", "it", "'s", "OK", "to", "have", "professional", "politicians", "at", "the", "Justice", "Department", "and", "the", "Pentagon", "..." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-19", "sentence": "BEGALA Janet Reno was a career prosecutor .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "Janet", "Reno", "was", "a", "career", "prosecutor", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-20", "sentence": "NOVAK Just a minute , let me finish my sentence , please .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Just", "a", "minute", ",", "let", "me", "finish", "my", "sentence", ",", "please", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-21", "sentence": "It 's OK to put Democratic career politicians at the Pentagon and the Justice Department if they 're Democrats but not if they 're Republicans , is that right ?", "tokens": [ "It", "'s", "OK", "to", "put", "Democratic", "career", "politicians", "at", "the", "Pentagon", "and", "the", "Justice", "Department", "if", "they", "'re", "Democrats", "but", "not", "if", "they", "'re", "Republicans", ",", "is", "that", "right", "?" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-22", "sentence": "BEGALA No , the difference is Janet Reno was a career prosecutor .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "No", ",", "the", "difference", "is", "Janet", "Reno", "was", "a", "career", "prosecutor", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-23", "sentence": "( CROSSTALK )", "tokens": [ "(", "CROSSTALK", ")" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-24", "sentence": "BEGALA John Ashcroft was n't half the woman that Janet Reno was .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "John", "Ashcroft", "was", "n't", "half", "the", "woman", "that", "Janet", "Reno", "was", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-25", "sentence": "NOVAK Another potential Democratic presidential candidate pondered whether to run , and he made his announcement , and surprise , surprise , the answer was no .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Another", "potential", "Democratic", "presidential", "candidate", "pondered", "whether", "to", "run", ",", "and", "he", "made", "his", "announcement", ",", "and", "surprise", ",", "surprise", ",", "the", "answer", "was", "no", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-26", "sentence": "Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut made the announcement today that he would not be the 10th candidate for the nomination .", "tokens": [ "Senator", "Christopher", "Dodd", "of", "Connecticut", "made", "the", "announcement", "today", "that", "he", "would", "not", "be", "the", "10th", "candidate", "for", "the", "nomination", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-27", "sentence": "Why not ? Surely Chris Dodd is at least more credible than Carol Moseley - Braun or Dennis Kucinich .", "tokens": [ "Why", "not", "?", "Surely", "Chris", "Dodd", "is", "at", "least", "more", "credible", "than", "Carol", "Moseley", "-", "Braun", "or", "Dennis", "Kucinich", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-28", "sentence": "He explained he could better spend the next two years on homeland security , the economy and judicial nominations .", "tokens": [ "He", "explained", "he", "could", "better", "spend", "the", "next", "two", "years", "on", "homeland", "security", ",", "the", "economy", "and", "judicial", "nominations", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-29", "sentence": "I guess that means harassing Tom Ridge , fighting tax cuts and obstructing President Bush 's plans to reform judiciary .", "tokens": [ "I", "guess", "that", "means", "harassing", "Tom", "Ridge", ",", "fighting", "tax", "cuts", "and", "obstructing", "President", "Bush", "'s", "plans", "to", "reform", "judiciary", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-30", "sentence": "Some two years .", "tokens": [ "Some", "two", "years", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-31", "sentence": "BEGALA God , I hope so .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "God", ",", "I", "hope", "so", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-32", "sentence": "that 's all I can say .", "tokens": [ "that", "'s", "all", "I", "can", "say", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-33", "sentence": "I love Senator Dodd .", "tokens": [ "I", "love", "Senator", "Dodd", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-34", "sentence": "He would have brought a lot to the race .", "tokens": [ "He", "would", "have", "brought", "a", "lot", "to", "the", "race", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-35", "sentence": "He brings a lot to the Senate and to the debate .", "tokens": [ "He", "brings", "a", "lot", "to", "the", "Senate", "and", "to", "the", "debate", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-36", "sentence": "And I 'm glad that he 's going to be fighting those fights .", "tokens": [ "And", "I", "'m", "glad", "that", "he", "'s", "going", "to", "be", "fighting", "those", "fights", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-37", "sentence": "Well , the Commerce Department reports today that consumer spending declined in January and that the manufacturing sector slowed in February .", "tokens": [ "Well", ",", "the", "Commerce", "Department", "reports", "today", "that", "consumer", "spending", "declined", "in", "January", "and", "that", "the", "manufacturing", "sector", "slowed", "in", "February", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-38", "sentence": "In all , two million Americans have lost their jobs under President Bush so far , not to mention three of them being the top three leaders of his economic team .", "tokens": [ "In", "all", ",", "two", "million", "Americans", "have", "lost", "their", "jobs", "under", "President", "Bush", "so", "far", ",", "not", "to", "mention", "three", "of", "them", "being", "the", "top", "three", "leaders", "of", "his", "economic", "team", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-39", "sentence": "Meanwhile , the deficit now at $ 300 billion .", "tokens": [ "Meanwhile", ",", "the", "deficit", "now", "at", "$", "300", "billion", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-40", "sentence": "It could swell to as much as $ 500 billion if we go to war in Iraq .", "tokens": [ "It", "could", "swell", "to", "as", "much", "as", "$", "500", "billion", "if", "we", "go", "to", "war", "in", "Iraq", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-41", "sentence": "Mr. Bush apparently is untroubled by this fiscal collapse .", "tokens": [ "Mr.", "Bush", "apparently", "is", "untroubled", "by", "this", "fiscal", "collapse", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-42", "sentence": "One of his aides tells the current issue of \" TIME , \" magazine , quote , \" even if it 's $ 500 billion , so what ? \" Of course , even a $ 500 billion deficit number does n't count the $ 3 trillion Mr. Bush is robbing from the Social Security trust fund .", "tokens": [ "One", "of", "his", "aides", "tells", "the", "current", "issue", "of", "\"", "TIME", ",", "\"", "magazine", ",", "quote", ",", "\"", "even", "if", "it", "'s", "$", "500", "billion", ",", "so", "what", "?", "\"", "Of", "course", ",", "even", "a", "$", "500", "billion", "deficit", "number", "does", "n't", "count", "the", "$", "3", "trillion", "Mr.", "Bush", "is", "robbing", "from", "the", "Social", "Security", "trust", "fund", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-43", "sentence": "You know , we should have known , every time George W. Bush gets in trouble , he borrows from a trust fund .", "tokens": [ "You", "know", ",", "we", "should", "have", "known", ",", "every", "time", "George", "W.", "Bush", "gets", "in", "trouble", ",", "he", "borrows", "from", "a", "trust", "fund", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-44", "sentence": "It 's been his whole life , you know .", "tokens": [ "It", "'s", "been", "his", "whole", "life", ",", "you", "know", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-45", "sentence": "NOVAK Let me give you two economic facts of like , which you should know , even if you wo n't recognize them .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Let", "me", "give", "you", "two", "economic", "facts", "of", "like", ",", "which", "you", "should", "know", ",", "even", "if", "you", "wo", "n't", "recognize", "them", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-46", "sentence": "Number one , there is absolutely no relationship between the deficit and unemployment .", "tokens": [ "Number", "one", ",", "there", "is", "absolutely", "no", "relationship", "between", "the", "deficit", "and", "unemployment", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-47", "sentence": "They do n't go together .", "tokens": [ "They", "do", "n't", "go", "together", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-48", "sentence": "And number two , there is no Social Security fund , Virginia . There just is n't one .", "tokens": [ "And", "number", "two", ",", "there", "is", "no", "Social", "Security", "fund", ",", "Virginia", ".", "There", "just", "is", "n't", "one", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-49", "sentence": "BEGALA Because Bush squandered it on his tax cuts .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "Because", "Bush", "squandered", "it", "on", "his", "tax", "cuts", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-50", "sentence": "NOVAK There never has been one .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "There", "never", "has", "been", "one", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-51", "sentence": "BEGALA There has been one for 60 years .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "There", "has", "been", "one", "for", "60", "years", "." ] } ]	[ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-6-EV0", "type": "Movement:Transport", "type_id": 177, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-6-EV0", "trigger_word": "landed", "description": "", "sent_id": 6, "offset": [ 27, 28 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-8-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Elect", "type_id": 194, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-8-EV0", "trigger_word": "election", "description": "", "sent_id": 8, "offset": [ 3, 4 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-12-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Elect", "type_id": 194, "description": "The Personnel:Elect event signifies the process through which an individual is chosen by a group of people, typically voters, to hold a position of authority or responsibility in a governmental or organizational structure. This election can occur through various methods such as voting, appointment, or other formal procedures designed to ensure a fair selection process. The event highlights the democratic principles underlying the governance of societies and the importance of public participation in choosing leaders.", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-12-EV0", "trigger_word": "elected", "description": "The word 'elected' in this context refers to the formal act of selecting an individual for a position of authority or responsibility within a government or organization through a process involving voter participation. It emphasizes the democratic principle of allowing citizens to choose their representatives or leaders, thereby ensuring accountability and representation. The use of 'elected' underscores the legitimacy and popular support behind the individual's appointment to office.", "sent_id": 12, "offset": [ 23, 24 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "somebody", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'somebody' refers to the individual who is being discussed as potentially fitting the definition of a professional politician. As the agent in the event of being elected, this person is the subject of the discussion and is implied to have been chosen by the electorate to occupy a public office, reflecting their involvement in the political system.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "public office", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Public office refers to a position within the government or a similar organization where the holder performs official duties for the benefit of the public. In this context, it is the outcome or result of the election process mentioned, indicating that the person under discussion has been selected to serve in a role that involves representing the public interest and making decisions that affect the community.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-15-EV0", "type": "Movement:Transport", "type_id": 177, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-15-EV0", "trigger_word": "land", "description": "", "sent_id": 15, "offset": [ 7, 8 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-17-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Start-Position", "type_id": 192, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-17-EV0", "trigger_word": "Hire", "description": "", "sent_id": 17, "offset": [ 0, 1 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-21-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Start-Position", "type_id": 192, "description": "Personnel:Start-Position denotes the initiation of an individual's employment or appointment in a specific role or position within an organization. This event captures the moment when a person begins their tenure in a new job, reflecting changes in organizational structure or staffing needs. It is significant for tracking career progression, identifying leadership transitions, and understanding shifts in organizational dynamics. This event is common in political and administrative contexts, where appointments often carry substantial implications for policy direction and institutional operations.", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-21-EV0", "trigger_word": "put", "description": "The verb 'put' in this sentence acts as a trigger for the Personnel:Start-Position event, indicating the placement or appointment of individuals into specific roles or positions. In the context of political appointments, 'put' signifies the formal assignment of 'Democratic career politicians' to key positions within the Pentagon and the Justice Department. This usage implies an intentional decision-making process aimed at aligning personnel with organizational goals or political agendas, highlighting the strategic nature of such placements in influencing institutional outcomes and public perception.", "sent_id": 21, "offset": [ 4, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Democratic career politicians", "role": "Agent", "description": "The term 'Democratic career politicians' identifies the individuals being appointed or placed in specific roles or positions. These agents are characterized by their long-term involvement in Democratic politics, suggesting a pattern of behavior driven by party loyalty and ideological alignment. Their placement in key government positions reflects a strategic decision to leverage their experience and connections within the party to shape policy and administration according to Democratic principles. This role underscores the significant impact of political affiliations on organizational staffing and governance.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Pentagon", "role": "Place", "description": "The Pentagon represents the location or organization where 'Democratic career politicians' are being placed or appointed. As the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, the Pentagon plays a pivotal role in national security and military affairs. The placement of individuals in this institution can significantly influence defense strategies, procurement processes, and international relations. This role highlights the strategic importance of personnel decisions in maintaining effective and impartial governance within critical governmental bodies.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Justice Department", "role": "Place", "description": "The Justice Department serves as another critical location where 'Democratic career politicians' are being placed or appointed. As a cornerstone of the U.S. legal system, this department is responsible for enforcing federal laws, prosecuting crimes, and ensuring justice and fairness. The placement of individuals in this department can profoundly impact legal proceedings, law enforcement practices, and public trust in the judiciary. This role emphasizes the need for impartiality and competence in staffing decisions within essential governmental functions.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-26-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Nominate", "type_id": 199, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-26-EV0", "trigger_word": "nomination", "description": "", "sent_id": 26, "offset": [ 19, 20 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-28-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Nominate", "type_id": 199, "description": "Personnel:Nominate involves the act of proposing or recommending a person for a particular position or role, often within an organizational or governmental context. This event is significant as it marks the initiation of a formal selection process, which can have long-term impacts on the functioning and composition of the organization or government body. Nominations are typically made by individuals or groups with authority or influence over the decision-making process.", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-28-EV0", "trigger_word": "nominations", "description": "Nominations refer to the process of selecting candidates for official positions, such as judgeships, through a formal recommendation or proposal. In this sentence, the term 'nominations' is used to emphasize the importance of the judicial appointment process, indicating that the agent is focused on ensuring qualified individuals are considered for these roles. The mention of nominations suggests that the agent views this as a critical aspect of their responsibilities and priorities.", "sent_id": 28, "offset": [ 18, 19 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "judicial nominations", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Judicial nominations are the specific type of nominations being referred to in the sentence. They involve the selection process for judges or other judicial positions within the legal system. In this context, judicial nominations are highlighted as a key area of focus, indicating that the agent places significant importance on ensuring the integrity and quality of the judiciary. The role of judicial nominations in the event is to serve as the primary artifact around which the explanation is centered.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-40-EV0", "type": "Conflict:Attack", "type_id": 175, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-40-EV0", "trigger_word": "war", "description": "", "sent_id": 40, "offset": [ 14, 15 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "2e539877-2eaa-4be8-93b4-405f8bb01da0", "type": "contact.prevarication.broadcast", "type_id": -1, "description": "Contact.prevarication.broadcast refers to the act of presenting or discussing a controversial topic or question, often aimed at generating debate or discussion. This event typically involves a speaker or writer raising a provocative issue to stimulate public interest or provoke thought. Such broadcasts can be instrumental in shaping public opinion or policy debates by highlighting complex or morally challenging scenarios.", "mention": [ { "id": "ae063ff9-d645-4975-b7dd-92fe359302e9", "trigger_word": "Questions", "description": "The use of 'Questions' here indicates the initiation of a debate or discussion on a sensitive topic, specifically the potential military action against Iraq and the ethical considerations of torture. This trigger word signifies the start of a discourse that aims to explore multiple viewpoints and provoke critical thinking among the audience.", "sent_id": 3, "offset": [ 0, 7 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Attacking Iraq", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact 'Attacking Iraq' represents the central issue being debated. In this context, it denotes the hypothetical military operation against Iraq, which serves as the subject matter around which the questions are framed. This artifact highlights the primary focus of the broadcast or discussion, indicating the controversial nature of such an attack and its potential consequences.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Torturing Terrorists", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact 'Torturing Terrorists' refers to another critical aspect of the debate initiated by the questions posed. It addresses the ethical dilemma surrounding the use of torture as a means to extract information from suspected terrorists. This artifact underscores the moral complexities and legal ramifications associated with such practices, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and public scrutiny.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "46ea4a6b-7c04-4dea-aed6-533433a39eb2", "trigger_word": "debate", "description": "The term 'debate' in this context refers to a structured discussion where participants present opposing viewpoints on a particular topic or issue. It involves the exchange of ideas, arguments, and evidence to persuade others or reach a consensus. In the given sentence, 'debate' suggests a planned discussion to be held later in the show, indicating a future event where differing perspectives will be explored.", "sent_id": 4, "offset": [ 9, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "we", "role": "Agent", "description": "The 'Agent' in this context refers to the individuals or group initiating and participating in the debate. They are the primary actors responsible for presenting their viewpoints and engaging in the discussion. Here, 'we' indicates a collective entity, likely referring to the show's participants or guests, who will be actively involved in the debate process.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "that", "role": "Topic", "description": "The 'Topic' in this context refers to the subject matter or issue that will be debated. While not explicitly defined in the sentence, 'that' points to a previously mentioned or understood topic that the speakers intend to discuss further during the show. The topic could be anything relevant to the show's theme or recent events, which the audience would recognize or infer based on the context.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "4e167eb5-5c1d-4ae6-92fa-fe362375a363", "trigger_word": "undetected", "description": "The term 'undetected' in this context implies that the landing of the Cuban patrol boat went unnoticed by the authorities, specifically the Coast Guard. This suggests a failure in surveillance or monitoring systems, allowing an unauthorized vessel to enter U.S. territory without being intercepted or reported. The implication is that the Coast Guard's operations were ineffective or compromised, leading to a breach in security protocols.", "sent_id": 6, "offset": [ 47, 56 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "the Coast Guard", "role": "Recipient", "description": "The recipient in this prevarication broadcast event is the Coast Guard, representing the entity that failed to detect the incoming patrol boat. This role highlights the target audience or the intended receiver of the misleading or omitted information, in this case, the responsible body for maritime security that was unaware of the intrusion.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "utterly undetected", "role": "Instrument", "description": "The instrument in this prevarication broadcast event is the phrase 'utterly undetected', representing the method or tool used to convey the misleading information. Here, it signifies the absence of detection, implying a lapse in security measures that allowed the patrol boat to enter undisturbed. This role emphasizes the mechanism through which the deception occurred, highlighting the operational failure that facilitated the event.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "3ec37021-d783-4f51-b4c0-8ba8bd82256e", "trigger_word": "placed", "description": "In this context, 'placed' signifies the act of assigning or appointing a person or group to a particular position or responsibility. Here, it indicates that the president has appointed certain individuals to handle homeland security, suggesting a strategic decision or allocation of duties. The use of 'placed' implies a formal and intentional action, reflecting the authority and power of the president in making such appointments.", "sent_id": 7, "offset": [ 18, 23 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "our president", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent in this event is the individual responsible for making the appointment. In this case, 'our president' refers to the head of state who has the authority to assign roles within the government. As the Agent, the president initiates the action by placing individuals in positions of responsibility, highlighting the central role of leadership in organizational management and policy implementation.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "homeland security", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Homeland security, as the Artifact in this event, is the domain or area of responsibility being assigned. It encompasses various measures and strategies aimed at protecting a nation from internal and external threats. The Artifact highlights the critical nature of the task and underscores the importance of having competent and trustworthy individuals overseeing such matters. Its role is pivotal in understanding the significance of the appointment mentioned in the sentence.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Republican political hacks", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Republican political hacks, identified as the Beneficiary, are the recipients of the appointment made by the president. These individuals benefit from being chosen for the role of managing homeland security. The term 'political hacks' suggests they may have more experience in political maneuvering than professional expertise, implying a potential criticism of the appointment based on their perceived lack of suitability for the task at hand.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "15356d66-4ceb-4da5-906e-fb61f062d80c", "trigger_word": "lost", "description": "In this context, 'lost' indicates a situation where the subject of the sentence did not succeed in achieving a desired outcome, specifically losing an election. The term 'lost' underscores the defeat or failure experienced by the individual mentioned, highlighting the negative result of the competitive process. It suggests that despite efforts and expectations, the person failed to secure the position or victory sought, leading to disappointment or other emotional responses.", "sent_id": 8, "offset": [ 0, 3 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the person who lost the election. This role signifies the individual who was actively participating in the election process and whose efforts resulted in failure. The term 'Agent' in this context points to the primary actor involved in the event, emphasizing their active role and direct involvement in the unsuccessful attempt to win the election.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "an election", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the election itself, representing the formal process through which a winner is determined. This role highlights the object or mechanism around which the event revolves, indicating the competitive framework within which the agent's actions took place. The election serves as the central point of focus, where the outcome (winning or losing) is decided based on votes or other criteria established by the electoral system.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "46ab373f-a13c-4684-81e1-b680fc261942", "trigger_word": "passed over", "description": "The phrase 'passed over' in this context signifies that Tom Ridge was not selected for a position he may have been considered for, specifically the vice presidency. This indicates a form of prevarication or indirect communication, suggesting that Ridge was omitted from a significant opportunity due to political considerations or personal decisions, rather than being directly informed of his exclusion. This usage highlights the subtle ways in which important decisions can be communicated without explicitly stating refusal.", "sent_id": 9, "offset": [ 32, 37 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent role in this event refers to the person who is the subject of the prevarication or indirect communication. In this case, Tom Ridge, the Secretary of Homeland Security, is the individual who was not directly informed of his exclusion from the vice presidential nomination. His role is crucial as he is the central figure whose potential opportunity was conveyed through indirect means, highlighting the impact of such communication on his career prospects.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Mr. Bush", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The Beneficiary role in this event pertains to the individual or group that benefits from the prevarication or indirect communication. Here, Mr. Bush (presumably George W. Bush) is the one making the decision to exclude Tom Ridge from the vice presidential nomination, and thus he benefits from the indirect manner in which this information is conveyed, potentially avoiding direct confrontation or conflict with Ridge.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "eda39098-4250-4e92-ad47-340a19e94ea6", "trigger_word": "graduate", "description": "In the context of this sentence, 'graduate' serves as a trigger indicating a prevaricative broadcast, where the speaker implies a negative connotation towards Asa Hutchinson's educational background by associating it with a university seen as controversial. This use of 'graduate' is not merely factual but carries a loaded message about the individual’s character or affiliations, thereby serving as a subtle form of misinformation or prejudice.", "sent_id": 10, "offset": [ 48, 56 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Asa Hutchinson", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Asa Hutchinson', who is the primary subject of the misleading statement about his educational background. As the agent, he is indirectly implicated in the act of receiving or being associated with a controversial education, which is presented in a way that may influence perceptions negatively without directly stating false facts.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Bob Jones University", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Bob Jones University, referred to here, acts as the artifact in this event. It is a specific institution mentioned in a way that suggests controversy or disapproval, implying a broader context of criticism or stigma associated with the university. By associating Asa Hutchinson with this institution, the statement aims to convey a negative implication about his background without explicitly stating a falsehood.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "d904e94a-7ed5-4337-a7fb-2d0b9f44eed5", "trigger_word": "turns", "description": "In this context, 'turns' implies a shift or reliance on professional advice or expertise, particularly in critical situations. The verb 'turns' suggests that Mr. Bush seeks out professional guidance only when faced with important decisions or challenges, indicating a pattern of behavior where he defers to experts when matters become too complex or significant to handle alone. This usage of 'turns' reflects a strategic decision-making process influenced by external input.", "sent_id": 11, "offset": [ 12, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Mr. Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this context refers to Mr. Bush, who initiates the act of seeking professional advice. As the subject of the sentence, Mr. Bush is portrayed as someone who relies on experts for critical decisions, suggesting a cautious approach to handling significant issues. The role of the agent here involves the active decision-making process where Mr. Bush chooses to consult professionals rather than making decisions independently.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "professionals", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Professionals, in this scenario, are those individuals or groups providing specialized knowledge or expertise to Mr. Bush. They benefit from this situation by having their skills and insights utilized in high-stakes scenarios. The beneficiary role highlights the positive impact on the professionals, as they are sought out for their valuable contributions during crucial moments, thereby reinforcing their importance and relevance.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "5310c2b9-9cc7-4f70-b984-1a76735d8fd9", "trigger_word": "were", "description": "In this context, 'were' acts as a passive voice verb that indicates the existence or status of individuals as professional politicians within the Clinton administration. It does not directly imply deception but rather highlights the presence and categorization of certain individuals based on their professional background and role in politics. This use of 'were' emphasizes the identification and classification of members of the cabinet, providing insight into the composition of the administration and the nature of their political careers.", "sent_id": 13, "offset": [ 17, 20 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "members of the cabinet", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiaries in this event are the members of the cabinet who are being described as professional politicians. These individuals benefit from the categorization because it underscores their political expertise and experience, potentially enhancing their credibility and influence within the administration. By being labeled as professional politicians, these members are positioned as seasoned players in the political arena, which can strengthen their standing and effectiveness in their roles.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Clinton administration", "role": "Place", "description": "The place in this event refers to the Clinton administration, which serves as the setting or context for the categorization of the cabinet members as professional politicians. This administration is the environment in which these individuals operate and hold their positions, making it crucial for understanding their roles and the nature of their political involvement. The Clinton administration provides the backdrop against which the categorization takes place, highlighting the specific political context and era being discussed.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "d267d83a-b43f-4417-a8bf-9cd823ccf1bf", "trigger_word": "did", "description": "In this context, 'did' acts as a trigger word indicating the completion of an action or achievement. While it doesn't explicitly denote deception, its use alongside positive reinforcement ('hell of a job') implies an acknowledgment of work done. However, given the lack of direct attribution or specifics, it subtly hints at a broader implication that might not align perfectly with the reality of the situation, thus fitting into the prevarication broadcast category.", "sent_id": 14, "offset": [ 18, 21 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "they", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'they,' referring to a group of people whose actions are being acknowledged. The agent performs the act of broadcasting the message by completing a task or job, which is then evaluated positively despite potential underlying issues or inaccuracies. The role of the agent is crucial as it directly engages in the dissemination of information, whether true or misleading.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a hell of a job", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is 'a hell of a job,' which represents the outcome or result of the agent's actions. It serves as a tangible manifestation of the work completed by 'they.' The phrase 'a hell of a job' indicates a high level of performance or effort, yet it could also imply a positive spin on potentially less-than-stellar outcomes, contributing to the overall sense of prevarication or subtle misrepresentation.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "for our country", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is 'for our country,' signifying the entity that is supposed to benefit from the actions of the agent. It suggests that the work done by 'they' is intended to serve the nation or community, creating a positive association. However, the role of beneficiary can also highlight any discrepancies if the actual impact does not align with the positive portrayal, emphasizing the potential for misleading communication.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "6bbe1799-044f-4921-9792-46f925920e4d", "trigger_word": "trying", "description": "The word 'trying' in this context suggests an attempt or effort to mislead or deceive by claiming a particular situation or condition exists. In the sentence, it implies that there is an intention to broadcast a false alarm regarding a high terrorist alert, possibly to create panic or justify actions taken by certain parties.", "sent_id": 15, "offset": [ 33, 38 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "these bozos", "role": "Agent", "description": "The 'Agent' in this event is 'these bozos', which refers to the individuals or group attempting to spread misinformation. The use of the derogatory term 'bozos' suggests a negative perception of these agents, implying they are acting irresponsibly or dishonestly in their efforts to misinform others.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "high terrorist alert", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' in this context is 'high terrorist alert', which is the false information being propagated. This artifact represents the fabricated claim or message that the 'Agent' is attempting to disseminate. It is presented as a serious security concern but is actually part of the deceptive strategy employed by the 'Agent'.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "9ad969ee-8b44-4eb8-8249-d75bb822eb50", "trigger_word": "put", "description": "In this context, 'put' serves as a verb indicating the act of assigning responsibility or control over a particular domain or task. The term suggests an intentional decision-making process where authority or duties are transferred from one entity to another, often implying a change in management or oversight. Here, it conveys the idea that the president has assigned the responsibility of homeland security to certain individuals, potentially with negative connotations regarding their competence or reliability.", "sent_id": 16, "offset": [ 18, 21 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Our president", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'Our president,' who is the primary actor responsible for the action of delegating the responsibility of homeland security. As the agent, the president is initiating the event by making a decision that affects the organization or governance of national security measures. This role highlights the president's authority and the impact of their decisions on the nation's security apparatus.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "homeland security", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Homeland security represents the object or domain over which responsibility is being assigned. In this context, it refers to the broad set of policies, procedures, and organizations dedicated to protecting a country from internal and external threats. The artifact role emphasizes that homeland security is the subject of the presidential decision, highlighting its importance and the potential implications of its management.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "failed Republican hacks", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is 'failed Republican hacks,' who are receiving the responsibility of managing homeland security. The term 'beneficiary' here is used to indicate that these individuals are gaining control or influence over the domain of homeland security, despite the pejorative connotation suggesting their perceived incompetence or past failures. This role underscores the controversial nature of the assignment and the skepticism surrounding the beneficiaries' qualifications.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7bc6edb1-7004-4c6b-8ef0-39530e7be6c1", "trigger_word": "OK", "description": "In this sentence, 'OK' acts as a trigger for the event 'contact.prevarication.broadcast'. It implies acceptance or approval of a situation that might otherwise be contentious or problematic. The use of 'OK' here suggests a form of prevarication or misleading statement, where the speaker is attempting to normalize or justify having professional politicians in key government positions like the Justice Department and Pentagon, despite potential ethical concerns or conflicts of interest.", "sent_id": 18, "offset": [ 6, 7 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "professional politicians", "role": "Agent", "description": "The term 'professional politicians' refers to individuals whose primary occupation is political office-holding and campaigning. In this context, the agent is those professional politicians who are being accepted into or allowed to occupy positions within the Justice Department and the Pentagon. They serve as the primary actors responsible for carrying out actions related to policy-making and governance within these governmental institutions.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Justice Department", "role": "Place", "description": "The Justice Department, also known as the Department of Justice, is a federal executive department in the United States responsible for enforcing federal laws and administering justice. Here, it represents the location where professional politicians are being accepted or permitted to work, which raises questions about the separation of powers and the integrity of law enforcement and judicial processes.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Pentagon", "role": "Place", "description": "The Pentagon is the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, located in Arlington, Virginia. In this context, it signifies another place where professional politicians are being accepted or allowed to work, raising concerns about the influence of politics on military operations and decision-making.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "c22be9c7-7c2c-4bc7-b435-7c3d39f549e6", "trigger_word": "finish", "description": "In this context, 'finish' acts as a trigger indicating an attempt to complete a statement or thought that has been interrupted. It suggests that the speaker wishes to conclude their intended communication without further interruption, emphasizing their desire to convey a full message or idea uninterrupted by others. The use of 'finish' here implies a polite yet firm request for attention, reflecting the speaker's intent to communicate fully before yielding the floor.", "sent_id": 20, "offset": [ 19, 25 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "NOVAK", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the individual initiating the request to allow them to complete their statement. They are actively engaging in the conversation by asserting their right to continue speaking without interruption, demonstrating a desire to express their thoughts fully. The role of the agent is crucial as they are the primary actor seeking to maintain control over the direction and content of the dialogue.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "my sentence", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the incomplete statement or sentence that the agent wishes to complete. It represents the core content of the communication that has been disrupted and is now the subject of the agent's insistence on finishing. As an artifact, it is the object around which the interaction revolves, highlighting the importance of the unspoken portion of the message to the agent.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "52b3f9be-5c1d-4c8a-9892-6568cfc83f9b", "trigger_word": "OK", "description": "In this context, 'OK' serves as an implicit trigger for the event of broadcasting prevarication. It indicates an acceptance or endorsement of the practice of placing certain individuals in positions of power based on their political affiliation rather than merit. The use of 'OK' here suggests a tacit agreement to engage in behavior that could be perceived as biased or unfair, thereby contributing to the spread of misleading information or the perception thereof. This subtle trigger highlights the nuanced ways in which misinformation can be communicated and accepted within political and bureaucratic spheres.", "sent_id": 21, "offset": [ 4, 6 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Democratic career politicians", "role": "Agent", "description": "The term 'Democratic career politicians' identifies the primary actors or agents responsible for the event of broadcasting prevarication. These individuals are characterized by their long-standing involvement in Democratic politics, suggesting a pattern of behavior influenced by party loyalty rather than impartiality or expertise. As agents, they play a crucial role in shaping policy decisions and institutional practices, potentially leading to the dissemination of biased or misleading information within government agencies like the Pentagon and the Justice Department.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Pentagon", "role": "Place", "description": "The Pentagon, as a place, represents one of the key locations where the event of broadcasting prevarication takes place. This iconic building houses the United States Department of Defense and is central to military strategy and defense policies. By involving 'Democratic career politicians' in such a critical institution, there is a risk of skewed decision-making or policy implementation, which could have far-reaching consequences for national security and international relations. The role of the Pentagon in this context underscores the importance of maintaining unbiased governance in high-stakes governmental bodies.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Justice Department", "role": "Place", "description": "The Justice Department serves as another critical location where the event of broadcasting prevarication unfolds. As a central component of the U.S. legal system, it is responsible for enforcing federal laws and ensuring justice and fairness across the nation. The involvement of 'Democratic career politicians' in this department raises concerns about potential bias in law enforcement and judicial processes, which could undermine the integrity of the legal system and public trust in government institutions. This role highlights the delicate balance required in maintaining impartiality within such vital governmental functions.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "bc7c55bd-6f38-4042-93e5-ba2df8feb7d1", "trigger_word": "No", "description": "In this context, 'No' functions as a trigger word indicating a denial or refutation of a previous statement or assumption. The speaker is clarifying a distinction by negating an implied comparison, asserting that Janet Reno's background as a career prosecutor is fundamentally different from whatever was previously suggested or assumed. This negation serves to correct misconceptions and highlight specific aspects of Janet Reno's professional history.", "sent_id": 22, "offset": [ 0, 2 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Janet Reno", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is Janet Reno, who is being discussed in terms of her professional background. The term 'agent' here refers to the person whose actions or characteristics are being highlighted, in this case, her status as a career prosecutor. This role is crucial because it identifies the primary subject of the statement, emphasizing her professional identity and distinguishing it from other potential backgrounds or roles she might have had.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "career prosecutor", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is 'career prosecutor,' which represents the professional identity or attribute of Janet Reno that is being emphasized. This term signifies her long-term involvement and expertise in the legal profession, specifically in prosecuting cases. By highlighting this aspect of her background, the statement aims to underscore her experience and qualifications within the justice system, setting her apart from other possible roles or identities.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "33bca251-8199-4505-98ef-5f50b87d239a", "trigger_word": "wasn't", "description": "The trigger 'wasn't' in this context indicates a comparative judgment being made, suggesting that one individual is considered inferior or less capable compared to another. This usage of 'wasn't' implies a negative comparison, highlighting perceived shortcomings of the subject in question, John Ashcroft, when compared to Janet Reno. It reflects a subjective evaluation rather than an objective assessment.", "sent_id": 24, "offset": [ 13, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "John Ashcroft", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'John Ashcroft' serves as the primary subject of the comparative statement. He is the individual being evaluated negatively against Janet Reno. As the agent, John Ashcroft is the focal point of the subjective judgment being expressed, highlighting his perceived inadequacy in comparison to the other mentioned figure.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Janet Reno", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Janet Reno, in this sentence, is portrayed positively through the comparative statement. She is positioned as superior to John Ashcroft, indicating that she is the beneficiary of the positive comparison. As the beneficiary, Janet Reno is implicitly praised for qualities or achievements that are suggested to surpass those of John Ashcroft.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "6eb4af24-13ac-4cdb-a295-2d6e1173c95c", "trigger_word": "pondered", "description": "Pondered, in this context, indicates that the subject is considering or reflecting deeply on a decision, specifically whether to run for a political position. This verb suggests a process of internal deliberation, where the individual weighs the pros and cons of taking a particular course of action. It highlights the contemplative phase before making a final decision, often seen in high-stakes scenarios like political candidacy.", "sent_id": 25, "offset": [ 8, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Another potential Democratic presidential candidate", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this context is 'Another potential Democratic presidential candidate,' referring to an individual who is being considered for a future role as a Democratic presidential candidate. This person is actively thinking about whether to pursue a candidacy, indicating a significant decision-making process that could impact their political career and the broader landscape of democratic politics.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "88d32a1c-e3c8-49e4-b026-092524814617", "trigger_word": "made", "description": "Made, in this context, signifies the act of officially declaring or announcing a decision, particularly regarding the candidate's intention to run for office. This verb captures the moment when the individual publicly communicates their stance on whether they will participate in the election process, marking a critical point in their campaign strategy and public engagement.", "sent_id": 25, "offset": [ 22, 26 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "his announcement", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact here is 'his announcement,' which represents the formal statement or declaration made by the candidate regarding their decision to run for office. This document or verbal statement serves as the official communication of the candidate's intentions, providing clarity to supporters, opponents, and the general public about their stance on entering the political race.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "67edcd1e-fb4d-4319-a2e7-84a4b9a1dab3", "trigger_word": "announced", "description": "Announced, in this context, refers to the act of publicly revealing or stating information, particularly concerning the candidate's decision about running for office. This verb underscores the official communication of a decision, emphasizing the transparency and directness with which the candidate shares their intentions with the public.", "sent_id": 25, "offset": [ 22, 26 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "the answer was no", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this context is 'the answer was no,' which indicates the outcome or decision that was communicated through the announcement. This phrase specifies the content of the announcement, revealing that the candidate decided against running for the presidency, thus affecting their future political plans and the expectations of those who might have supported them.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "2dbb72f6-ff2d-4aa9-a5ad-c6e35d4e5eda", "trigger_word": "announcement", "description": "In this sentence, 'announcement' refers to the act of publicly declaring Senator Christopher Dodd's decision not to run for nomination. It indicates a formal statement made by a public figure to inform the general public about a significant personal or organizational decision. The term 'announcement' suggests a deliberate and official communication, highlighting the importance of the message being conveyed.", "sent_id": 26, "offset": [ 17, 26 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent in this event is Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who is the primary actor responsible for making the announcement. As the subject of the announcement, he is conveying a significant piece of information regarding his political aspirations. His role as the Agent emphasizes his active participation in the event and his direct involvement in shaping the public narrative around his political career.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "he would not be the 10th candidate for the nomination", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The Artifact in this event is the information that Senator Christopher Dodd would not be running as the tenth candidate for the nomination. This piece of information is central to the announcement and represents the core content being communicated. The Artifact plays a crucial role in informing the audience about the Senator's decision, thereby impacting public perception and political dynamics.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "d92637bd-c8b1-49c0-a439-4e4488a775f0", "trigger_word": "Surely", "description": "In this context, 'Surely' is used to imply a contrast or challenge to a previous doubt or disbelief. It suggests that the speaker believes the following statement is obvious or self-evident, thereby attempting to persuade the listener of the credibility of Chris Dodd over the other mentioned individuals. This word highlights the speaker's confidence in Chris Dodd's credibility despite any initial skepticism.", "sent_id": 27, "offset": [ 5, 12 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Chris Dodd", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is Chris Dodd, who is being portrayed as a credible individual. As the agent, Chris Dodd is the subject of the comparison and the one whose credibility is being asserted by the speaker. This role implies that he is being presented as a trustworthy source of information or opinion.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Carol Moseley-Braun", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Carol Moseley-Braun is considered in this context as a beneficiary, although indirectly. She is part of the comparison that elevates Chris Dodd’s credibility by implying she is less credible. The role of beneficiary here is somewhat paradoxical since the comparison actually diminishes her standing rather than benefiting her directly.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Dennis Kucinich", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Similar to Carol Moseley-Braun, Dennis Kucinich is also a beneficiary in this indirect sense. By being included in the comparison, his credibility is implied to be lower than Chris Dodd's, thus serving to elevate Chris Dodd’s perceived reliability. The role is again paradoxical, as the comparison is meant to highlight the lesser credibility of Kucinich.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "2541a482-40ac-4a19-8082-478d0868668a", "trigger_word": "explained", "description": "The word 'explained' in this context indicates an attempt by the subject to communicate information or reasoning to others. However, the content of the explanation suggests a prevaricating tone, implying that the true intention behind the statement may be to mislead or distract from other issues. This use of 'explained' is indicative of an effort to justify actions through selective or distorted information.", "sent_id": 28, "offset": [ 0, 8 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "he", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'he' refers to the person who is delivering the explanation or justification. As the agent, this individual is actively engaging in the communication process and is responsible for conveying the information to others. The role of the agent in this event is crucial as it is through their actions and statements that the potential misinformation or prevarication is being propagated.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "homeland security", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Homeland security is presented as one of the areas of focus mentioned in the explanation. In this context, it acts as an artifact or a topic around which the explanation revolves. The mention of homeland security suggests that the agent is attempting to justify their actions or decisions related to national security matters, potentially using this as a reason to support their position or deflect attention from other issues.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "the economy", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Economy is another area highlighted in the explanation, serving as an artifact within the event. By mentioning the economy, the agent is likely trying to convey the importance of their actions in relation to economic stability or growth. This inclusion helps to frame the explanation in terms of broader societal benefits, suggesting that the agent's decisions are driven by a desire to positively impact the nation's economic health.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "judicial nominations", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Judicial nominations are also discussed as part of the explanation, acting as an artifact in the event. This reference indicates that the agent is addressing the selection process for judges or other judicial positions. By focusing on judicial nominations, the agent aims to highlight the importance of maintaining judicial integrity and balance, possibly using this as a justification for their actions or decisions.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "18b18c12-3c7b-4928-9689-e30d0f29eaab", "trigger_word": "say", "description": "In the context of the sentence, 'say' here indicates an act of communication where the speaker conveys a message, which in this case is limited to stating that there is nothing more to be said. The use of 'say' as a trigger word suggests an intentional act of verbal expression, even if it is minimalistic or evasive. This triggers the recognition of a prevaricative broadcast event, where the speaker chooses to limit the information shared, potentially leading to incomplete or misleading impressions.", "sent_id": 32, "offset": [ 12, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the subject of the sentence, represented by the pronoun 'I'. As the agent, this entity is responsible for performing the action of communicating the message, which in this case is a statement indicating a lack of further information. The role of the agent is crucial because it identifies the individual who is conveying the message and thus influencing the perception of the situation.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7c8b3bf8-6b6e-4a60-a130-9ed2c4c32bb9", "trigger_word": "love", "description": "In this context, 'love' signifies a strong positive emotional attachment or admiration expressed towards Senator Dodd. This trigger word represents an overt declaration of affection or support, indicating a favorable disposition or endorsement of the mentioned individual. The use of 'love' here implies a deeper level of connection or respect beyond mere acquaintance or professional relationship, suggesting a personal or passionate regard for Senator Dodd.", "sent_id": 33, "offset": [ 2, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the subject expressing the feeling of love towards Senator Dodd. In this case, 'I' refers to the speaker making the declaration, representing the individual who holds the sentiment and is communicating it directly. The role of the agent is crucial as it identifies the source of the emotion being conveyed, establishing the personal nature of the statement and the direct involvement of the speaker in expressing their feelings.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Senator Dodd", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is the recipient of the expressed affection or admiration. Here, 'Senator Dodd' is the person towards whom the positive emotion is directed, indicating that they are the object of the speaker's feelings. As the beneficiary, Senator Dodd is on the receiving end of the sentiment, highlighting their significance in relation to the speaker's expressed emotions and the nature of the relationship being acknowledged.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "913d98a6-b61c-4c61-ad6b-9f12a890fdf7", "trigger_word": "brought", "description": "The word 'brought' in this context is used to imply that the subject had the potential to contribute significantly to an event, without explicitly stating that he participated. It suggests a hypothetical situation where the subject could have made valuable contributions if certain conditions were met. The use of 'would have' emphasizes the speculative nature of the statement, indicating that the actual contribution did not occur but could have been beneficial.", "sent_id": 34, "offset": [ 7, 13 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'He', who is suggested to have had the capability to make substantial contributions to the race. As the subject of the sentence, 'He' is implied to possess qualities or skills that would have positively influenced the race if he had participated. The role of the agent here is crucial in conveying the potential impact of his involvement, even though it remains speculative.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a lot", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The term 'a lot' in this context acts as a beneficiary, implying that the race would have benefited greatly from the subject's participation. It suggests a significant positive impact on the race due to the contributions of 'He'. The beneficiary role here underscores the value and importance of the potential contributions, highlighting how much the race could have gained from the subject's involvement.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "the race", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is 'the race', which is the object that would have been positively affected by the subject's participation. As the focus of the implied contribution, 'the race' represents the scenario or competition that stands to gain from the subject's involvement. The role of the artifact highlights the specific context in which the potential benefits are discussed, emphasizing the importance of the race in the broader narrative or discussion.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "65f629e2-7cca-475a-8350-b41bcf2986fe", "trigger_word": "brings", "description": "The verb 'brings' in this context signifies the act of conveying or contributing something valuable or influential to a setting or discussion. It implies a positive action where the subject is actively introducing ideas, skills, or attributes that enhance or enrich the environment or dialogue. In this specific instance, it denotes the contribution of the subject to the Senate and debates, highlighting the individual's impact and value within these settings.", "sent_id": 35, "offset": [ 0, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent, referred to as 'He', is the primary actor responsible for bringing or contributing something to the Senate and debates. This role highlights the active involvement of the individual in providing beneficial elements such as knowledge, experience, or viewpoints that positively influence the proceedings. The agent's actions are seen as deliberate and impactful, enhancing the quality and direction of discussions and legislative activities.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a lot", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact, described as 'a lot,' refers to the substantial contributions or benefits that the agent brings to the Senate and debates. This term indicates a significant amount or variety of valuable inputs, which could encompass a range of attributes such as expertise, innovative ideas, or persuasive arguments. The use of 'a lot' emphasizes the abundance and importance of these contributions, underscoring their positive impact on the proceedings.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "to the Senate and to the debate", "role": "Place", "description": "The place, specified as 'to the Senate and to the debate,' identifies the locations or forums where the contributions are made. The Senate represents a formal legislative body, while the debate signifies the discussions and deliberations taking place within it. Together, these roles indicate the specific contexts in which the agent's contributions are recognized and utilized, highlighting the importance of the agent's input in shaping legislative outcomes and fostering informed discourse.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "c03ca42d-8fe7-45b7-bc87-bf5f4d570218", "trigger_word": "untroubled", "description": "The term 'untroubled' in this context suggests that Mr. Bush is not concerned or affected by a particular situation, specifically a fiscal collapse. This implies that despite the serious economic downturn, Mr. Bush remains indifferent or unaffected, possibly due to his position of power or wealth which insulates him from the negative consequences.", "sent_id": 41, "offset": [ 18, 27 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Mr. Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'Agent' refers to Mr. Bush, who is the individual expressing indifference towards the fiscal collapse. As the agent, he is actively choosing to remain unconcerned or unaffected by the situation, indicating a level of detachment or immunity from the crisis.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "this fiscal collapse", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' here is 'this fiscal collapse,' which refers to a significant economic downturn or financial crisis. In this event, the fiscal collapse is the subject of Mr. Bush's indifference, representing the potential negative impacts on the economy and society that he appears to disregard.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7e055e7b-90ee-4372-a9be-2f3d5f0549e2", "trigger_word": "tells", "description": "The verb 'tells' in this context indicates that one person is conveying information to another, specifically an aide providing information to a publication. This action signifies a form of communication where information is shared, potentially with the intent to influence or inform the audience. The use of 'tells' suggests a direct interaction, highlighting the personal aspect of the information transfer, which can carry significant weight due to the perceived credibility of the source.", "sent_id": 42, "offset": [ 8, 13 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "One of his aides", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the individual or group responsible for initiating the act of conveying information. Here, 'one of his aides' refers to a subordinate or assistant who is relaying information to a third party, likely to represent or support the views or actions of a higher authority figure. This role underscores the hierarchical dynamics within organizations and the role of subordinates in shaping public narratives or perceptions.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "the current issue of 'TIME', magazine", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this context is the entity receiving the communicated information. In this case, 'the current issue of 'TIME', magazine' represents the medium through which the information is disseminated to a broader audience. This role highlights the importance of media outlets in shaping public discourse and the potential impact of the conveyed information on public opinion and awareness.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "892e7709-f150-47ab-b1ec-69162b9f1542", "trigger_word": "should have known", "description": "The phrase 'should have known' in this context implies a form of prevarication or deception, where the speaker suggests that there was prior knowledge or awareness that was intentionally withheld or ignored. This phrase highlights a situation where information was available but not acted upon, potentially leading to negative outcomes. It reflects a subtle form of communication aimed at shifting blame or responsibility away from the speaker towards those who failed to recognize or address the issue.", "sent_id": 43, "offset": [ 11, 20 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "George W. Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'George W. Bush' acts as the primary agent of the event, implying that he is the subject of the statement and potentially the one engaging in deceptive practices. As the agent, Bush is portrayed as the individual whose actions or behaviors are being scrutinized or criticized for their potential impact on public trust and understanding of his financial dealings. This role highlights his central position in the narrative of the sentence.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "trust fund", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The term 'trust fund' refers to a financial instrument designed to hold assets for the benefit of beneficiaries over time. In this context, the trust fund serves as an artifact involved in the event, suggesting that Bush may be utilizing funds from this source to mitigate personal financial issues or crises. The role of the trust fund as an artifact underscores its importance as a tangible element in the alleged deception or prevarication described by the sentence.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "e80534f4-2bed-4117-9140-c825f04e11d1", "trigger_word": "give", "description": "In this context, 'give' refers to the act of providing or presenting information to the audience. The speaker intends to share two economic facts, but there is an underlying implication that these facts might not be recognized or understood by the audience. This suggests a potential gap between the speaker's knowledge and the audience's comprehension, highlighting the speaker's role in conveying complex information in a potentially unclear manner.", "sent_id": 45, "offset": [ 14, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "two economic facts", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the piece of information or data being shared, specifically two economic facts. These facts serve as the content that the speaker is attempting to convey to the audience. However, the phrase 'even if you won't recognize them' implies that the facts might not be easily comprehensible or recognizable to the listener, suggesting a potential disconnect between the speaker's intention and the audience's ability to understand the information provided.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "you", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is the recipient of the information, represented by 'you' in the sentence. This individual is intended to benefit from the economic facts being conveyed, yet there is an implied uncertainty whether the information will actually be beneficial or recognized due to its complexity or presentation. The role of the beneficiary highlights the intended interaction between the speaker and the audience, emphasizing the potential impact of the communicated information on the listener's understanding.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "c88f2b20-fd3e-4d35-8044-f17d7472fb6d", "trigger_word": "don't", "description": "In this context, 'don't' functions as part of the negative construction that implies disagreement or non-concordance between two elements. It suggests that the items or concepts mentioned do not fit well or are incompatible, acting as a trigger for the broader idea of prevarication or communication of a mismatched idea.", "sent_id": 47, "offset": [ 0, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "They", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this context refers to the subject performing the action of negating compatibility or agreement. In the sentence, 'They' indicates a group or individuals who are expressing the lack of fit or coherence between two unspecified elements.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "6107204c-2131-40a7-aa53-7666d475a61a", "trigger_word": "broadcast", "description": "In the context of this sentence, 'broadcast' refers to the act of disseminating information widely, often through media channels or public statements. Here, the speaker is engaging in a form of prevarication, where they are spreading misinformation about the existence of a Social Security fund. This usage highlights the speaker's intention to influence public opinion or beliefs through deliberate falsehoods, emphasizing the deceptive nature of the broadcasted message.", "sent_id": 48, "offset": [ 37, 44 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "there is no Social Security fund", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this context is the false statement about the non-existence of a Social Security fund. This role signifies the object or piece of information being communicated, which in this case is intentionally misleading. The artifact plays a central role in the deception as it is the core message being spread, aiming to alter perceptions or beliefs regarding the actual status of the Social Security fund.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Virginia", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this context is 'Virginia', representing the intended audience or target of the misinformation. As a beneficiary, Virginia receives the broadcasted message, which is designed to influence her beliefs or actions. This role underscores the impact of the broadcast on the audience, highlighting how the misleading information could shape their understanding or decisions related to the Social Security fund.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "4b07ac45-e213-4cfe-8413-6f16d57d45b5", "trigger_word": "There has been one", "description": "The phrase 'There has been one' in this context implies the existence or occurrence of a singular instance without specifying what exactly it is. However, given the broader context and the sentence's structure, it likely refers to a broadcast or statement made over a period of time, indicating a continuous or recurring act of communication. This phrase serves as a vague yet definitive trigger, suggesting an ongoing event or phenomenon that has persisted for a certain duration.", "sent_id": 51, "offset": [ 0, 12 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "one", "role": "Artifact", "description": "In this event, the term 'one' acts as an artifact, referring to a singular instance of an unspecified but implied event or phenomenon. The role of an artifact here is to represent the subject matter of the broadcast or statement, which could be a piece of news, a claim, or any form of communicated content. The ambiguity in specifying what 'one' refers to underscores the broad nature of the event being discussed, making it a placeholder for various potential scenarios.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "for 60 years", "role": "Time", "description": "The phrase 'for 60 years' indicates the duration over which the event or phenomenon has occurred. In this context, it specifies that whatever 'one' refers to has existed or been communicated for a long period, emphasizing its persistence and longevity. The role of time here provides crucial temporal context, highlighting the sustained nature of the event and its significance over multiple generations or decades.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "136026ab-e353-488a-abe2-2c40449833fd", "type": "contact.prevarication.withhold", "type_id": -1, "description": "The event type 'contact.prevarication.withhold' signifies a situation where an individual chooses to refrain from sharing their opinions or insights on a particular topic until further notice or until more information becomes available. This act of withholding comments can be seen as a strategic decision made to avoid premature judgment or to ensure accuracy by deferring to expert opinions before forming one's own conclusions. It reflects a cautious approach to communication, emphasizing the importance of informed dialogue.", "mention": [ { "id": "f0e5e01e-305d-4430-a3f2-4ec05944bd52", "trigger_word": "withhold", "description": "In this sentence, 'withhold' indicates an intentional act of refraining from sharing personal views or opinions on a given subject. The speaker expresses a desire to hold back their comments until additional input from experts is received, demonstrating a commitment to making well-informed decisions and avoiding potential misinformation. This verb encapsulates a deliberate pause in communication aimed at ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the information shared.", "sent_id": 5, "offset": [ 27, 34 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'Agent' refers to the individual who is taking the action of withholding comments. The agent is the primary actor in the event, choosing to defer their opinion until receiving expert advice. This role highlights the proactive stance taken by the speaker to ensure that any information shared is accurate and based on reliable sources, thereby maintaining credibility and trustworthiness.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "comments", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' in this event represents the object or information that is being withheld. In this case, the artifact is the speaker's comments or opinions on a specific matter. By withholding these comments, the speaker demonstrates a willingness to consider expert opinions before forming and sharing their own views, emphasizing the value placed on informed and evidence-based discourse.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "02ef8029-f785-47c7-8e41-2f25549fa746", "type": "movement.transport", "type_id": 177, "description": "This event type represents the movement of a person or object from one location to another through a means of transportation. It captures the act of traveling or being transported, which can involve various modes such as vehicles, ships, aircraft, or even animals. This event is crucial in understanding the flow of entities across geographical boundaries and often indicates the start or end of a journey.", "mention": [ { "id": "d0fd2c5f-fcb0-4f47-b440-036d75b45061", "trigger_word": "landed", "description": "The verb 'landed' in this context signifies the arrival of a vessel or vehicle at a specific destination, marking the completion of a transit phase. In this sentence, it refers to the Cuban patrol boat reaching American shores, highlighting the successful navigation and arrival of the boat at its intended location. This action underscores the physical transition from sea to land, indicating a definitive point of entry.", "sent_id": 6, "offset": [ 27, 28 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "a 30-foot Cuban patrol boat with four heavily armed men", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this transport event is the Cuban patrol boat accompanied by armed individuals. This role identifies the primary object or entity being moved during the transportation process. Here, it specifies the means of conveyance and the personnel involved, emphasizing the nature of the transported item and the potential threat posed by the accompanying armed men.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "American shores", "role": "Place", "description": "The place in this transport event is the American shores, representing the final destination where the Cuban patrol boat arrived. This role provides the location where the transportation ends, highlighting the significance of the event in terms of crossing national borders and entering a new territory, potentially raising security concerns.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "10897cc3-acf2-40f5-bc12-2ef3f5d83249", "trigger_word": "land", "description": "The term 'land' in this context signifies the arrival or coming ashore of individuals or objects after being transported over water. It implies the transition from a sea or air journey to a terrestrial destination, marking the endpoint of a voyage. In the given sentence, 'land' denotes the act of reaching the shore following a crossing.", "sent_id": 15, "offset": [ 7, 8 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "four armed Cubans", "role": "Agent", "description": "The 'Agent' in this scenario refers to the individuals who are performing the action of landing. Here, the 'Agent' is 'four armed Cubans', indicating that these are the subjects responsible for the movement and arrival at the shore. Their involvement as armed individuals suggests a potentially threatening or dangerous situation.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "our shores", "role": "Place", "description": "The 'Place' role in this event represents the location where the action takes place. In this case, 'our shores' indicates the point of arrival for the 'Agent'. This phrase likely refers to the coastlines of the speaker's country, emphasizing the foreign nature of the 'Agent's' arrival.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "dbd70653-c080-4c19-bdc5-c9b2308d3d9d", "type": "life.elect", "type_id": 194, "description": "This event type refers to the process by which individuals are chosen for a position through a formal voting process. Elections are fundamental to democratic systems, allowing citizens to select representatives or leaders based on their preferences. This event involves multiple participants, including voters, candidates, and sometimes electoral officials. The outcome of an election determines who will hold power in various levels of government or organizations, making it a crucial aspect of governance and public decision-making.", "mention": [ { "id": "dc13b820-ca96-446b-af44-2466e31516f2", "trigger_word": "election", "description": "In this context, 'election' signifies a formal procedure where individuals vote to choose a candidate for a particular office or position. This event highlights the democratic process wherein eligible voters cast their ballots, and the candidate receiving the most votes wins the election. The term 'election' emphasizes the competitive nature of the process and the importance of voter participation in determining the outcome.", "sent_id": 8, "offset": [ 3, 4 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the person who participated in the election but did not win. In the context of elections, the agent often refers to a candidate running for office. Here, 'He' represents the individual who was competing against another candidate in the election and ultimately lost the contest.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a dead man", "role": "Victim", "description": "The victim, or in this case, the winning candidate, is referred to as 'a dead man'. This unusual situation implies that the election was won by a deceased individual, which is highly uncommon and suggests potential issues or irregularities in the electoral process. The term 'victim' is used here to highlight the unusual nature of the winning party, emphasizing the unexpected and potentially controversial result of the election.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "1fe67783-c0c2-40e8-833a-dbd9b70ed3f2", "type": "transaction.transfer", "type_id": 192, "description": "This event type describes a situation where one party gives control or possession of something to another. In professional contexts, such as hiring, it involves transferring authority or responsibility over tasks and duties from the employer to the employee. This transfer signifies the beginning of a contractual agreement between the parties involved, establishing roles, responsibilities, and expectations.", "mention": [ { "id": "d7aa4d09-d17d-4280-8485-19957ad8c56f", "trigger_word": "Hire", "description": "In this context, 'Hire' denotes the act of engaging professionals for work or services. It involves offering employment terms and conditions to individuals or groups, indicating a formal agreement to compensate them for their labor or expertise. The verb 'Hire' signifies the initiation of a professional relationship where the hirer (employer) benefits from the hired (employee)'s skills and efforts.", "sent_id": 17, "offset": [ 0, 1 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "professionals", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The Beneficiary in this event refers to the group or individual receiving the benefit of the transaction, which in this case is the hiring of professionals. These professionals are expected to contribute their expertise and labor towards achieving certain goals or completing specific tasks, thereby enhancing the operational capacity or project outcomes of the entity doing the hiring.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Mr. President", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent in this event is the individual or entity responsible for initiating the action of hiring. Here, 'Mr. President' is the person making the decision to engage professionals, implying he holds a position of authority and is capable of authorizing such transactions. His role underscores his leadership and the strategic importance of the hiring decision.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "29b6ff31-3243-492a-9a6d-d12e43f54c02", "trigger_word": "declined", "description": "In this context, 'declined' signifies a decrease or reduction in consumer spending. This term indicates a negative trend in economic activity, reflecting reduced consumer confidence or purchasing power. It suggests that consumers are buying fewer goods and services, which can have broader implications for businesses and the economy.", "sent_id": 37, "offset": [ 34, 41 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "consumer spending", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient in this event is the entity affected by the decline in consumer spending. Here, 'consumer spending' refers to the total amount of money spent by individuals on goods and services within an economy. A decline in this spending can indicate weaker economic conditions and reduced consumer confidence.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "January", "role": "Time", "description": "The time role specifies when the event occurred. In this case, 'January' marks the month during which the decline in consumer spending took place. This temporal information helps in understanding the timing and context of the economic change described.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "76aed757-deb4-4ae7-951e-39874a830b59", "trigger_word": "slowed", "description": "Here, 'slowed' denotes a reduction in the pace or rate of activity within the manufacturing sector. This term indicates a deceleration in production, output, or economic growth. Such a slowdown can reflect challenges in the industry, impacting jobs, investments, and economic forecasts.", "sent_id": 37, "offset": [ 50, 55 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "the manufacturing sector", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient in this event is the entity affected by the slowdown in activity. 'The manufacturing sector' refers to the part of the economy that involves the production of tangible goods through manufacturing processes. A slowdown here can affect various aspects of economic performance and job markets.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "February", "role": "Time", "description": "The time role specifies when the event occurred. In this instance, 'February' marks the month during which the slowdown in the manufacturing sector took place. This temporal information is crucial for understanding the timing and context of the economic change described.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7e784254-e484-46c0-9e70-28878d7d7e5c", "trigger_word": "lost", "description": "In this sentence, 'lost' indicates a negative change in employment status, specifically the termination of job positions. It implies a significant shift in the professional lives of those affected, often leading to financial instability and personal stress. The term 'lost' here underscores the involuntary nature of the job loss and the impact it has on the individuals and the economy as a whole.", "sent_id": 38, "offset": [ 20, 24 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "two million Americans", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient in this event is the group of people whose employment status has changed due to the job loss. These individuals are directly affected by the event, experiencing a significant disruption in their livelihoods and possibly facing financial hardship. The role of the patient highlights the direct impact of the event on the individuals involved.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "their jobs", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event refers to the job positions that have been lost. Jobs are tangible elements of employment that individuals hold and perform, providing income and identity. The loss of these artifacts signifies a significant change in the lives of the affected individuals, impacting their daily routines, financial stability, and sense of purpose.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "President Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the entity responsible for the condition or situation that led to the job losses. In this case, President Bush is implicated as the leader during the period of job losses, suggesting a connection between his policies or leadership and the resulting economic outcomes. The role of the agent emphasizes the causal relationship between the leader's actions and the consequences faced by the population.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "3d971e5d-fdd6-4030-97f3-666c546bc93c", "trigger_word": "deficit", "description": "The term 'deficit' in this context refers to a shortfall or imbalance where expenditures exceed revenues or income. Specifically, it indicates that the government's spending exceeds its revenue by $300 billion, reflecting a significant financial gap that needs to be addressed through borrowing, reducing expenses, or increasing revenues. This term highlights a critical issue in fiscal management and underscores the need for policy adjustments to stabilize the economy and prevent further financial strain.", "sent_id": 39, "offset": [ 10, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "$ 300 billion", "role": "Artifact", "description": "In the context of a transaction.transfer event, the 'Artifact' role denotes the object or resource being transferred or affected by the event. Here, '$300 billion' represents the magnitude of the financial deficit, indicating the scale of the shortfall in the government's finances. This amount signifies the extent to which government spending surpasses its revenue, highlighting the severity of the financial challenge faced by the entity in question.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7e0cb85b-d64b-42f2-b0e0-a4d399d795da", "trigger_word": "swell", "description": "The verb 'swell' in this context signifies an increase or expansion, particularly in terms of monetary value. It implies that the cost or expenditure will grow significantly due to the proposed military action. This usage underscores the potential for a substantial rise in financial outlays associated with war efforts.", "sent_id": 40, "offset": [ 8, 11 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "$500 billion", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the monetary amount that could potentially increase due to the war. This figure represents the economic burden that might be incurred as a result of military operations, indicating the scale of financial commitment required to sustain such a conflict.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "dbc04079-d1f7-4861-b28a-437d60896943", "trigger_word": "squandered", "description": "In this context, 'squandered' indicates the act of wastefully spending or misusing resources, particularly money or opportunities. This term conveys a sense of negligence or poor judgment in managing valuable assets, leading to their unnecessary depletion or loss. The use of 'squandered' implies that the resources could have been used more effectively or responsibly, highlighting a negative consequence of the action.", "sent_id": 49, "offset": [ 8, 16 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent, in this case 'Bush', is the primary actor responsible for the event. As the subject performing the action of squandering, Bush is directly accountable for the misuse of resources. This role highlights the individual's active involvement in the event, emphasizing their responsibility and the potential impact of their actions on others and themselves.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "it", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient, represented by 'it' in this sentence, refers to the resource or opportunity that Bush wasted. While not explicitly defined, 'it' likely refers to some form of asset or advantage that Bush had but failed to utilize properly. This role underscores the object affected by the agent's actions, illustrating the consequences of the wasteful behavior on the intended benefit or resource.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b2ccbdad-b7ac-4ff5-b1de-4398cf61842f", "type": "life.profession", "type_id": -1, "description": "The event type 'life.profession' signifies an individual's occupation or career path. This type of event is used to denote the professional role or position held by a person, which often reflects their expertise, training, and ongoing work activities. It is commonly found in biographical contexts where the focus is on describing the professional journey of an individual.", "mention": [ { "id": "7b57ecd3-0168-4fe3-af58-20f89bca8865", "trigger_word": "was", "description": "In this context, the word 'was' functions as a passive verb indicating a state or condition that Janet Reno held as her profession. It suggests that she had the role of a career prosecutor, implying a long-term dedication and specialization in legal prosecution.", "sent_id": 19, "offset": [ 8, 10 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Janet Reno", "role": "Patient", "description": "The term 'Patient' here does not refer to someone receiving medical care but rather to the individual whose profession or state is being described. In this case, Janet Reno is the subject of the sentence, indicating that she was a career prosecutor.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "career prosecutor", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' role in this context refers to the object or thing that the event involves. Here, 'career prosecutor' is the artifact, signifying the professional role that Janet Reno held throughout her career. It indicates her specialization and experience in the field of law enforcement and prosecution.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "6cf04cc1-0578-48df-a61e-c90cca4c9152", "type": "conflict.harass", "type_id": -1, "description": "Harassment involves persistent, unwanted behavior that aims to distress, intimidate, or bother another individual. This can take various forms, such as verbal abuse, stalking, or cyberbullying. In political contexts, harassment might be used as a tactic to undermine or discredit opponents or critics. Harassment is often considered a serious offense and can have legal repercussions.", "mention": [ { "id": "5fd77ffd-eeb2-410a-90c5-acf4a52ed4dd", "trigger_word": "harassing", "description": "The term 'harassing' refers to the act of persistently bothering or intimidating someone through repeated and unwelcome actions or communications. In this context, it suggests ongoing efforts to trouble or distress Tom Ridge, likely as part of a broader political strategy or campaign against him.", "sent_id": 29, "offset": [ 7, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Tom Ridge", "role": "Victim", "description": "The victim is the person who experiences the negative impact of the harasser's actions. Here, Tom Ridge is the target of harassment, implying he faces persistent and unwanted attention or actions aimed at causing distress or discomfort.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent is the entity performing the action. In this case, the speaker is indicating that they are responsible for or engaged in the act of harassing Tom Ridge, though the statement is framed as a guess or assumption rather than a direct admission.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b18f3965-5ed6-4cb9-b431-91084f6e14ee", "type": "conflict.fight", "type_id": -1, "description": "Fighting involves engaging in a physical confrontation or struggle with another party, often characterized by aggressive or violent behavior. In political contexts, 'fighting' can metaphorically refer to opposing or contesting policies or ideas, especially those related to contentious issues like tax cuts. Such conflicts can shape public opinion and influence legislative outcomes.", "mention": [ { "id": "329dc1bd-27c4-4c3f-85b7-b49f2e04992e", "trigger_word": "fighting", "description": "In this context, 'fighting' does not imply physical combat but rather a strong opposition or resistance to a particular policy or idea. The speaker indicates that there is an active struggle or contest against tax cuts, suggesting a political battle over fiscal policies and their implications.", "sent_id": 29, "offset": [ 20, 28 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "tax cuts", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact is the object or concept that is the focus of the conflict. In this case, 'tax cuts' represent the policy or idea that is being contested or fought against, symbolizing a broader debate on economic and fiscal matters.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "21f02c5d-da0f-4f62-b622-fb8742238b75", "trigger_word": "fighting", "description": "In this context, the word 'fighting' denotes the act of engaging in a struggle or contest against an opponent. It implies active participation in a conflict, whether physical or metaphorical, with the intention of overcoming challenges or adversaries. The term 'fighting' captures the essence of opposition and resistance, indicating a proactive stance taken by the subject to address or resolve issues. It conveys a sense of determination and effort in facing difficulties or competing against others.", "sent_id": 36, "offset": [ 29, 35 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "he", "role": "Agent", "description": "The role of 'Agent' in this context refers to the individual actively engaged in the fight. The agent is the primary actor who initiates or participates in the conflict, taking direct action to confront or engage with the opposing forces. In the given sentence, 'he' is the person undertaking the fight, demonstrating initiative and involvement in the struggle. This role highlights the active and decisive nature of the agent's participation in the event.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "those fights", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The role of 'Artifact' here refers to the specific fights or conflicts that 'he' is involved in. These fights represent the objects or goals of the agent's actions, signifying the challenges or adversities that need to be addressed. The phrase 'those fights' indicates a pre-existing set of struggles or battles that the agent is prepared to face. This role emphasizes the tangible nature of the conflict and the specific nature of the challenges being tackled.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "06bdc3a2-8a3e-41ea-b76a-2741575a04f5", "type": "conflict.obstruct", "type_id": -1, "description": "Obstruction involves deliberately hindering or preventing progress or completion of an activity, plan, or proposal. In political settings, obstruction can manifest as blocking legislation or delaying processes, often to prevent or alter a desired outcome. This action can significantly impact governance and decision-making.", "mention": [ { "id": "dd683bab-2e82-429b-b6aa-91871ba3bfb0", "trigger_word": "obstructing", "description": "To obstruct means to interfere with, delay, or prevent the progress of something. Here, it signifies an effort to hinder or block President Bush's plans to reform the judiciary, implying that there are forces working against the implementation of these reforms.", "sent_id": 29, "offset": [ 36, 45 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "President Bush's plans to reform judiciary", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact is the specific plan or process that is being obstructed. In this instance, it refers to President Bush's proposals aimed at reforming the judicial system, which are being impeded or delayed by some unspecified actors.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "03599943-c691-48bb-8777-84a1024983c1", "type": "conflict.attack", "type_id": 175, "description": "A conflict.attack event signifies an aggressive act where one party attempts to harm or defeat another through forceful action. This can range from physical confrontations to broader military engagements. In the context of the given sentence, it refers to the potential military engagement against Iraq, highlighting the escalation of tensions into a full-scale war scenario.", "mention": [ { "id": "809ca645-543f-4641-b9dd-c924440377c2", "trigger_word": "war", "description": "The term 'war' in this context indicates a state of armed conflict between nations or other organized groups. It suggests a large-scale military operation involving significant resources and casualties. Here, the use of 'war' implies a serious escalation of hostilities, which could lead to substantial economic and human costs.", "sent_id": 40, "offset": [ 14, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Iraq", "role": "Victim", "description": "In this event, Iraq is identified as the target of potential military action. As the 'Victim', Iraq would likely face the consequences of such a conflict, including loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and economic hardship. This role highlights Iraq's position as the primary recipient of hostile actions in the hypothetical scenario.", "type_id": null } ] } ] } ]	[]	0
CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05	CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05","tokens":["CNN_CF_20030303.1(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05-4-EV0","type":"Personnel:End-Position","type_id":176,"description":"(...TRUNCATED)	[]	1
CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1	CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06 - 1","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1-7-EV0","type":"Contact:Phone-Write","type_id":187,"description":""(...TRUNCATED)	[]	2
CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2	CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06 - 2","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2-9-EV0","type":"Conflict:Attack","type_id":175,"description":"This (...TRUNCATED)	[]	3
CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02	CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02","tokens":["CNN_CF_20030304.1(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02-5-EV0","type":"Business:End-Org","type_id":171,"description":"This e(...TRUNCATED)	[]	4
CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04	CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04","tokens":["CNN_CF_20030304.1(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04-6-EV0","type":"Conflict:Attack","type_id":175,"description":"Conflic(...TRUNCATED)	[]	5
CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2	CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06 - 2","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2-7-EV0","type":"Justice:Arrest-Jail","type_id":185,"description":"T(...TRUNCATED)	[]	6
CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1	CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00 - 1","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1-6-EV0","type":"Conflict:Attack","type_id":175,"description":"","me(...TRUNCATED)	[]	7
CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2	CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00 - 2","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2-4-EV0","type":"Personnel:End-Position","type_id":176,"description"(...TRUNCATED)	[]	8
CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3	CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00 - 3","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)	[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3-4-EV0","type":"Personnel:End-Position","type_id":176,"description"(...TRUNCATED)	[]	9

CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00

[ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-0", "sentence": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00", "tokens": [ "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-1", "sentence": "STORY", "tokens": [ "STORY" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-2", "sentence": "2003 - 03 - 03T19:00:00 - 05:00", "tokens": [ "2003", "-", "03", "-", "03T19:00:00", "-", "05:00" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-3", "sentence": "New Questions About Attacking Iraq ; Is Torturing Terrorists Necessary ?", "tokens": [ "New", "Questions", "About", "Attacking", "Iraq", ";", "Is", "Torturing", "Terrorists", "Necessary", "?" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-4", "sentence": "BEGALA Well , we 'll debate that later on in the show .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "Well", ",", "we", "'ll", "debate", "that", "later", "on", "in", "the", "show", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-5", "sentence": "We 'll have a couple of experts come out , so I 'll withhold my comments until then .", "tokens": [ "We", "'ll", "have", "a", "couple", "of", "experts", "come", "out", ",", "so", "I", "'ll", "withhold", "my", "comments", "until", "then", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-6", "sentence": "Even as the secretary of homeland security was putting his people on high alert last month , a 30-foot Cuban patrol boat with four heavily armed men landed on American shores , utterly undetected by the Coast Guard Secretary Ridge now leads .", "tokens": [ "Even", "as", "the", "secretary", "of", "homeland", "security", "was", "putting", "his", "people", "on", "high", "alert", "last", "month", ",", "a", "30-foot", "Cuban", "patrol", "boat", "with", "four", "heavily", "armed", "men", "landed", "on", "American", "shores", ",", "utterly", "undetected", "by", "the", "Coast", "Guard", "Secretary", "Ridge", "now", "leads", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-7", "sentence": "Now , why has our president placed homeland security in the hands of Republican political hacks instead of professionals , by the way ? Attorney General John Ashcroft , for example , is a career politician .", "tokens": [ "Now", ",", "why", "has", "our", "president", "placed", "homeland", "security", "in", "the", "hands", "of", "Republican", "political", "hacks", "instead", "of", "professionals", ",", "by", "the", "way", "?", "Attorney", "General", "John", "Ashcroft", ",", "for", "example", ",", "is", "a", "career", "politician", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-8", "sentence": "He lost an election to a dead man .", "tokens": [ "He", "lost", "an", "election", "to", "a", "dead", "man", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-9", "sentence": "Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge is another career politician who was passed over by Mr. Bush for the vice presidency .", "tokens": [ "Secretary", "of", "Homeland", "Security", "Tom", "Ridge", "is", "another", "career", "politician", "who", "was", "passed", "over", "by", "Mr.", "Bush", "for", "the", "vice", "presidency", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-10", "sentence": "And Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Asa Hutchinson is yet another career politician and a graduate of the disgraceful Bob Jones University .", "tokens": [ "And", "Deputy", "Secretary", "of", "Homeland", "Security", "Asa", "Hutchinson", "is", "yet", "another", "career", "politician", "and", "a", "graduate", "of", "the", "disgraceful", "Bob", "Jones", "University", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-11", "sentence": "Apparently , Mr. Bush only turns to professionals when it 's really important , like political consulting .", "tokens": [ "Apparently", ",", "Mr.", "Bush", "only", "turns", "to", "professionals", "when", "it", "'s", "really", "important", ",", "like", "political", "consulting", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-12", "sentence": "NOVAK Paul , as I understand your definition of a political -- of a professional politician based on that is somebody who is elected to public office .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Paul", ",", "as", "I", "understand", "your", "definition", "of", "a", "political", "--", "of", "a", "professional", "politician", "based", "on", "that", "is", "somebody", "who", "is", "elected", "to", "public", "office", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-13", "sentence": "Now in your administration , the Clinton administration , there were these members of the cabinet who by your definition were professional politicians -- Lloyd Bentsen , Les Aspin , William S. Cohen , Janet Reno , Bruce Babbitt , Mike Espy , Dan Glickman , Norman Mineta , Henry Cisneros , Federico Pena , Bill Richardson , Richard Riley , 12 of them , not to mention former Democratic National Chairman Ron Brown , and one of the great professional politicians of all time , Bill Daly .", "tokens": [ "Now", "in", "your", "administration", ",", "the", "Clinton", "administration", ",", "there", "were", "these", "members", "of", "the", "cabinet", "who", "by", "your", "definition", "were", "professional", "politicians", "--", "Lloyd", "Bentsen", ",", "Les", "Aspin", ",", "William", "S.", "Cohen", ",", "Janet", "Reno", ",", "Bruce", "Babbitt", ",", "Mike", "Espy", ",", "Dan", "Glickman", ",", "Norman", "Mineta", ",", "Henry", "Cisneros", ",", "Federico", "Pena", ",", "Bill", "Richardson", ",", "Richard", "Riley", ",", "12", "of", "them", ",", "not", "to", "mention", "former", "Democratic", "National", "Chairman", "Ron", "Brown", ",", "and", "one", "of", "the", "great", "professional", "politicians", "of", "all", "time", ",", "Bill", "Daly", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-14", "sentence": "BEGALA And you know what , they did a hell of a job for our country .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "And", "you", "know", "what", ",", "they", "did", "a", "hell", "of", "a", "job", "for", "our", "country", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-15", "sentence": "And these bozos let four armed Cubans land on our shores when they 're trying to make a high terrorist alert .", "tokens": [ "And", "these", "bozos", "let", "four", "armed", "Cubans", "land", "on", "our", "shores", "when", "they", "'re", "trying", "to", "make", "a", "high", "terrorist", "alert", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-16", "sentence": "Our president has put homeland security in the hands of failed Republican hacks .", "tokens": [ "Our", "president", "has", "put", "homeland", "security", "in", "the", "hands", "of", "failed", "Republican", "hacks", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-17", "sentence": "Hire professionals , Mr. President .", "tokens": [ "Hire", "professionals", ",", "Mr.", "President", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-18", "sentence": "NOVAK So it 's OK -- it 's OK to have professional politicians at the Justice Department and the Pentagon ...", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "So", "it", "'s", "OK", "--", "it", "'s", "OK", "to", "have", "professional", "politicians", "at", "the", "Justice", "Department", "and", "the", "Pentagon", "..." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-19", "sentence": "BEGALA Janet Reno was a career prosecutor .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "Janet", "Reno", "was", "a", "career", "prosecutor", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-20", "sentence": "NOVAK Just a minute , let me finish my sentence , please .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Just", "a", "minute", ",", "let", "me", "finish", "my", "sentence", ",", "please", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-21", "sentence": "It 's OK to put Democratic career politicians at the Pentagon and the Justice Department if they 're Democrats but not if they 're Republicans , is that right ?", "tokens": [ "It", "'s", "OK", "to", "put", "Democratic", "career", "politicians", "at", "the", "Pentagon", "and", "the", "Justice", "Department", "if", "they", "'re", "Democrats", "but", "not", "if", "they", "'re", "Republicans", ",", "is", "that", "right", "?" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-22", "sentence": "BEGALA No , the difference is Janet Reno was a career prosecutor .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "No", ",", "the", "difference", "is", "Janet", "Reno", "was", "a", "career", "prosecutor", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-23", "sentence": "( CROSSTALK )", "tokens": [ "(", "CROSSTALK", ")" ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-24", "sentence": "BEGALA John Ashcroft was n't half the woman that Janet Reno was .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "John", "Ashcroft", "was", "n't", "half", "the", "woman", "that", "Janet", "Reno", "was", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-25", "sentence": "NOVAK Another potential Democratic presidential candidate pondered whether to run , and he made his announcement , and surprise , surprise , the answer was no .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Another", "potential", "Democratic", "presidential", "candidate", "pondered", "whether", "to", "run", ",", "and", "he", "made", "his", "announcement", ",", "and", "surprise", ",", "surprise", ",", "the", "answer", "was", "no", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-26", "sentence": "Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut made the announcement today that he would not be the 10th candidate for the nomination .", "tokens": [ "Senator", "Christopher", "Dodd", "of", "Connecticut", "made", "the", "announcement", "today", "that", "he", "would", "not", "be", "the", "10th", "candidate", "for", "the", "nomination", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-27", "sentence": "Why not ? Surely Chris Dodd is at least more credible than Carol Moseley - Braun or Dennis Kucinich .", "tokens": [ "Why", "not", "?", "Surely", "Chris", "Dodd", "is", "at", "least", "more", "credible", "than", "Carol", "Moseley", "-", "Braun", "or", "Dennis", "Kucinich", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-28", "sentence": "He explained he could better spend the next two years on homeland security , the economy and judicial nominations .", "tokens": [ "He", "explained", "he", "could", "better", "spend", "the", "next", "two", "years", "on", "homeland", "security", ",", "the", "economy", "and", "judicial", "nominations", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-29", "sentence": "I guess that means harassing Tom Ridge , fighting tax cuts and obstructing President Bush 's plans to reform judiciary .", "tokens": [ "I", "guess", "that", "means", "harassing", "Tom", "Ridge", ",", "fighting", "tax", "cuts", "and", "obstructing", "President", "Bush", "'s", "plans", "to", "reform", "judiciary", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-30", "sentence": "Some two years .", "tokens": [ "Some", "two", "years", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-31", "sentence": "BEGALA God , I hope so .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "God", ",", "I", "hope", "so", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-32", "sentence": "that 's all I can say .", "tokens": [ "that", "'s", "all", "I", "can", "say", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-33", "sentence": "I love Senator Dodd .", "tokens": [ "I", "love", "Senator", "Dodd", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-34", "sentence": "He would have brought a lot to the race .", "tokens": [ "He", "would", "have", "brought", "a", "lot", "to", "the", "race", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-35", "sentence": "He brings a lot to the Senate and to the debate .", "tokens": [ "He", "brings", "a", "lot", "to", "the", "Senate", "and", "to", "the", "debate", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-36", "sentence": "And I 'm glad that he 's going to be fighting those fights .", "tokens": [ "And", "I", "'m", "glad", "that", "he", "'s", "going", "to", "be", "fighting", "those", "fights", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-37", "sentence": "Well , the Commerce Department reports today that consumer spending declined in January and that the manufacturing sector slowed in February .", "tokens": [ "Well", ",", "the", "Commerce", "Department", "reports", "today", "that", "consumer", "spending", "declined", "in", "January", "and", "that", "the", "manufacturing", "sector", "slowed", "in", "February", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-38", "sentence": "In all , two million Americans have lost their jobs under President Bush so far , not to mention three of them being the top three leaders of his economic team .", "tokens": [ "In", "all", ",", "two", "million", "Americans", "have", "lost", "their", "jobs", "under", "President", "Bush", "so", "far", ",", "not", "to", "mention", "three", "of", "them", "being", "the", "top", "three", "leaders", "of", "his", "economic", "team", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-39", "sentence": "Meanwhile , the deficit now at $ 300 billion .", "tokens": [ "Meanwhile", ",", "the", "deficit", "now", "at", "$", "300", "billion", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-40", "sentence": "It could swell to as much as $ 500 billion if we go to war in Iraq .", "tokens": [ "It", "could", "swell", "to", "as", "much", "as", "$", "500", "billion", "if", "we", "go", "to", "war", "in", "Iraq", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-41", "sentence": "Mr. Bush apparently is untroubled by this fiscal collapse .", "tokens": [ "Mr.", "Bush", "apparently", "is", "untroubled", "by", "this", "fiscal", "collapse", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-42", "sentence": "One of his aides tells the current issue of \" TIME , \" magazine , quote , \" even if it 's $ 500 billion , so what ? \" Of course , even a $ 500 billion deficit number does n't count the $ 3 trillion Mr. Bush is robbing from the Social Security trust fund .", "tokens": [ "One", "of", "his", "aides", "tells", "the", "current", "issue", "of", "\"", "TIME", ",", "\"", "magazine", ",", "quote", ",", "\"", "even", "if", "it", "'s", "$", "500", "billion", ",", "so", "what", "?", "\"", "Of", "course", ",", "even", "a", "$", "500", "billion", "deficit", "number", "does", "n't", "count", "the", "$", "3", "trillion", "Mr.", "Bush", "is", "robbing", "from", "the", "Social", "Security", "trust", "fund", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-43", "sentence": "You know , we should have known , every time George W. Bush gets in trouble , he borrows from a trust fund .", "tokens": [ "You", "know", ",", "we", "should", "have", "known", ",", "every", "time", "George", "W.", "Bush", "gets", "in", "trouble", ",", "he", "borrows", "from", "a", "trust", "fund", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-44", "sentence": "It 's been his whole life , you know .", "tokens": [ "It", "'s", "been", "his", "whole", "life", ",", "you", "know", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-45", "sentence": "NOVAK Let me give you two economic facts of like , which you should know , even if you wo n't recognize them .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "Let", "me", "give", "you", "two", "economic", "facts", "of", "like", ",", "which", "you", "should", "know", ",", "even", "if", "you", "wo", "n't", "recognize", "them", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-46", "sentence": "Number one , there is absolutely no relationship between the deficit and unemployment .", "tokens": [ "Number", "one", ",", "there", "is", "absolutely", "no", "relationship", "between", "the", "deficit", "and", "unemployment", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-47", "sentence": "They do n't go together .", "tokens": [ "They", "do", "n't", "go", "together", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-48", "sentence": "And number two , there is no Social Security fund , Virginia . There just is n't one .", "tokens": [ "And", "number", "two", ",", "there", "is", "no", "Social", "Security", "fund", ",", "Virginia", ".", "There", "just", "is", "n't", "one", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-49", "sentence": "BEGALA Because Bush squandered it on his tax cuts .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "Because", "Bush", "squandered", "it", "on", "his", "tax", "cuts", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-50", "sentence": "NOVAK There never has been one .", "tokens": [ "NOVAK", "There", "never", "has", "been", "one", "." ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-51", "sentence": "BEGALA There has been one for 60 years .", "tokens": [ "BEGALA", "There", "has", "been", "one", "for", "60", "years", "." ] } ]

[ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-6-EV0", "type": "Movement:Transport", "type_id": 177, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-6-EV0", "trigger_word": "landed", "description": "", "sent_id": 6, "offset": [ 27, 28 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-8-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Elect", "type_id": 194, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-8-EV0", "trigger_word": "election", "description": "", "sent_id": 8, "offset": [ 3, 4 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-12-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Elect", "type_id": 194, "description": "The Personnel:Elect event signifies the process through which an individual is chosen by a group of people, typically voters, to hold a position of authority or responsibility in a governmental or organizational structure. This election can occur through various methods such as voting, appointment, or other formal procedures designed to ensure a fair selection process. The event highlights the democratic principles underlying the governance of societies and the importance of public participation in choosing leaders.", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-12-EV0", "trigger_word": "elected", "description": "The word 'elected' in this context refers to the formal act of selecting an individual for a position of authority or responsibility within a government or organization through a process involving voter participation. It emphasizes the democratic principle of allowing citizens to choose their representatives or leaders, thereby ensuring accountability and representation. The use of 'elected' underscores the legitimacy and popular support behind the individual's appointment to office.", "sent_id": 12, "offset": [ 23, 24 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "somebody", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'somebody' refers to the individual who is being discussed as potentially fitting the definition of a professional politician. As the agent in the event of being elected, this person is the subject of the discussion and is implied to have been chosen by the electorate to occupy a public office, reflecting their involvement in the political system.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "public office", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Public office refers to a position within the government or a similar organization where the holder performs official duties for the benefit of the public. In this context, it is the outcome or result of the election process mentioned, indicating that the person under discussion has been selected to serve in a role that involves representing the public interest and making decisions that affect the community.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-15-EV0", "type": "Movement:Transport", "type_id": 177, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-15-EV0", "trigger_word": "land", "description": "", "sent_id": 15, "offset": [ 7, 8 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-17-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Start-Position", "type_id": 192, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-17-EV0", "trigger_word": "Hire", "description": "", "sent_id": 17, "offset": [ 0, 1 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-21-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Start-Position", "type_id": 192, "description": "Personnel:Start-Position denotes the initiation of an individual's employment or appointment in a specific role or position within an organization. This event captures the moment when a person begins their tenure in a new job, reflecting changes in organizational structure or staffing needs. It is significant for tracking career progression, identifying leadership transitions, and understanding shifts in organizational dynamics. This event is common in political and administrative contexts, where appointments often carry substantial implications for policy direction and institutional operations.", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-21-EV0", "trigger_word": "put", "description": "The verb 'put' in this sentence acts as a trigger for the Personnel:Start-Position event, indicating the placement or appointment of individuals into specific roles or positions. In the context of political appointments, 'put' signifies the formal assignment of 'Democratic career politicians' to key positions within the Pentagon and the Justice Department. This usage implies an intentional decision-making process aimed at aligning personnel with organizational goals or political agendas, highlighting the strategic nature of such placements in influencing institutional outcomes and public perception.", "sent_id": 21, "offset": [ 4, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Democratic career politicians", "role": "Agent", "description": "The term 'Democratic career politicians' identifies the individuals being appointed or placed in specific roles or positions. These agents are characterized by their long-term involvement in Democratic politics, suggesting a pattern of behavior driven by party loyalty and ideological alignment. Their placement in key government positions reflects a strategic decision to leverage their experience and connections within the party to shape policy and administration according to Democratic principles. This role underscores the significant impact of political affiliations on organizational staffing and governance.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Pentagon", "role": "Place", "description": "The Pentagon represents the location or organization where 'Democratic career politicians' are being placed or appointed. As the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, the Pentagon plays a pivotal role in national security and military affairs. The placement of individuals in this institution can significantly influence defense strategies, procurement processes, and international relations. This role highlights the strategic importance of personnel decisions in maintaining effective and impartial governance within critical governmental bodies.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Justice Department", "role": "Place", "description": "The Justice Department serves as another critical location where 'Democratic career politicians' are being placed or appointed. As a cornerstone of the U.S. legal system, this department is responsible for enforcing federal laws, prosecuting crimes, and ensuring justice and fairness. The placement of individuals in this department can profoundly impact legal proceedings, law enforcement practices, and public trust in the judiciary. This role emphasizes the need for impartiality and competence in staffing decisions within essential governmental functions.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-26-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Nominate", "type_id": 199, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-26-EV0", "trigger_word": "nomination", "description": "", "sent_id": 26, "offset": [ 19, 20 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-28-EV0", "type": "Personnel:Nominate", "type_id": 199, "description": "Personnel:Nominate involves the act of proposing or recommending a person for a particular position or role, often within an organizational or governmental context. This event is significant as it marks the initiation of a formal selection process, which can have long-term impacts on the functioning and composition of the organization or government body. Nominations are typically made by individuals or groups with authority or influence over the decision-making process.", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-28-EV0", "trigger_word": "nominations", "description": "Nominations refer to the process of selecting candidates for official positions, such as judgeships, through a formal recommendation or proposal. In this sentence, the term 'nominations' is used to emphasize the importance of the judicial appointment process, indicating that the agent is focused on ensuring qualified individuals are considered for these roles. The mention of nominations suggests that the agent views this as a critical aspect of their responsibilities and priorities.", "sent_id": 28, "offset": [ 18, 19 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "judicial nominations", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Judicial nominations are the specific type of nominations being referred to in the sentence. They involve the selection process for judges or other judicial positions within the legal system. In this context, judicial nominations are highlighted as a key area of focus, indicating that the agent places significant importance on ensuring the integrity and quality of the judiciary. The role of judicial nominations in the event is to serve as the primary artifact around which the explanation is centered.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-40-EV0", "type": "Conflict:Attack", "type_id": 175, "description": "", "mention": [ { "id": "CNN_CF_20030303.1900.00-40-EV0", "trigger_word": "war", "description": "", "sent_id": 40, "offset": [ 14, 15 ], "arguments": [] } ] }, { "id": "2e539877-2eaa-4be8-93b4-405f8bb01da0", "type": "contact.prevarication.broadcast", "type_id": -1, "description": "Contact.prevarication.broadcast refers to the act of presenting or discussing a controversial topic or question, often aimed at generating debate or discussion. This event typically involves a speaker or writer raising a provocative issue to stimulate public interest or provoke thought. Such broadcasts can be instrumental in shaping public opinion or policy debates by highlighting complex or morally challenging scenarios.", "mention": [ { "id": "ae063ff9-d645-4975-b7dd-92fe359302e9", "trigger_word": "Questions", "description": "The use of 'Questions' here indicates the initiation of a debate or discussion on a sensitive topic, specifically the potential military action against Iraq and the ethical considerations of torture. This trigger word signifies the start of a discourse that aims to explore multiple viewpoints and provoke critical thinking among the audience.", "sent_id": 3, "offset": [ 0, 7 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Attacking Iraq", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact 'Attacking Iraq' represents the central issue being debated. In this context, it denotes the hypothetical military operation against Iraq, which serves as the subject matter around which the questions are framed. This artifact highlights the primary focus of the broadcast or discussion, indicating the controversial nature of such an attack and its potential consequences.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Torturing Terrorists", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact 'Torturing Terrorists' refers to another critical aspect of the debate initiated by the questions posed. It addresses the ethical dilemma surrounding the use of torture as a means to extract information from suspected terrorists. This artifact underscores the moral complexities and legal ramifications associated with such practices, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and public scrutiny.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "46ea4a6b-7c04-4dea-aed6-533433a39eb2", "trigger_word": "debate", "description": "The term 'debate' in this context refers to a structured discussion where participants present opposing viewpoints on a particular topic or issue. It involves the exchange of ideas, arguments, and evidence to persuade others or reach a consensus. In the given sentence, 'debate' suggests a planned discussion to be held later in the show, indicating a future event where differing perspectives will be explored.", "sent_id": 4, "offset": [ 9, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "we", "role": "Agent", "description": "The 'Agent' in this context refers to the individuals or group initiating and participating in the debate. They are the primary actors responsible for presenting their viewpoints and engaging in the discussion. Here, 'we' indicates a collective entity, likely referring to the show's participants or guests, who will be actively involved in the debate process.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "that", "role": "Topic", "description": "The 'Topic' in this context refers to the subject matter or issue that will be debated. While not explicitly defined in the sentence, 'that' points to a previously mentioned or understood topic that the speakers intend to discuss further during the show. The topic could be anything relevant to the show's theme or recent events, which the audience would recognize or infer based on the context.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "4e167eb5-5c1d-4ae6-92fa-fe362375a363", "trigger_word": "undetected", "description": "The term 'undetected' in this context implies that the landing of the Cuban patrol boat went unnoticed by the authorities, specifically the Coast Guard. This suggests a failure in surveillance or monitoring systems, allowing an unauthorized vessel to enter U.S. territory without being intercepted or reported. The implication is that the Coast Guard's operations were ineffective or compromised, leading to a breach in security protocols.", "sent_id": 6, "offset": [ 47, 56 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "the Coast Guard", "role": "Recipient", "description": "The recipient in this prevarication broadcast event is the Coast Guard, representing the entity that failed to detect the incoming patrol boat. This role highlights the target audience or the intended receiver of the misleading or omitted information, in this case, the responsible body for maritime security that was unaware of the intrusion.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "utterly undetected", "role": "Instrument", "description": "The instrument in this prevarication broadcast event is the phrase 'utterly undetected', representing the method or tool used to convey the misleading information. Here, it signifies the absence of detection, implying a lapse in security measures that allowed the patrol boat to enter undisturbed. This role emphasizes the mechanism through which the deception occurred, highlighting the operational failure that facilitated the event.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "3ec37021-d783-4f51-b4c0-8ba8bd82256e", "trigger_word": "placed", "description": "In this context, 'placed' signifies the act of assigning or appointing a person or group to a particular position or responsibility. Here, it indicates that the president has appointed certain individuals to handle homeland security, suggesting a strategic decision or allocation of duties. The use of 'placed' implies a formal and intentional action, reflecting the authority and power of the president in making such appointments.", "sent_id": 7, "offset": [ 18, 23 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "our president", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent in this event is the individual responsible for making the appointment. In this case, 'our president' refers to the head of state who has the authority to assign roles within the government. As the Agent, the president initiates the action by placing individuals in positions of responsibility, highlighting the central role of leadership in organizational management and policy implementation.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "homeland security", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Homeland security, as the Artifact in this event, is the domain or area of responsibility being assigned. It encompasses various measures and strategies aimed at protecting a nation from internal and external threats. The Artifact highlights the critical nature of the task and underscores the importance of having competent and trustworthy individuals overseeing such matters. Its role is pivotal in understanding the significance of the appointment mentioned in the sentence.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Republican political hacks", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Republican political hacks, identified as the Beneficiary, are the recipients of the appointment made by the president. These individuals benefit from being chosen for the role of managing homeland security. The term 'political hacks' suggests they may have more experience in political maneuvering than professional expertise, implying a potential criticism of the appointment based on their perceived lack of suitability for the task at hand.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "15356d66-4ceb-4da5-906e-fb61f062d80c", "trigger_word": "lost", "description": "In this context, 'lost' indicates a situation where the subject of the sentence did not succeed in achieving a desired outcome, specifically losing an election. The term 'lost' underscores the defeat or failure experienced by the individual mentioned, highlighting the negative result of the competitive process. It suggests that despite efforts and expectations, the person failed to secure the position or victory sought, leading to disappointment or other emotional responses.", "sent_id": 8, "offset": [ 0, 3 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the person who lost the election. This role signifies the individual who was actively participating in the election process and whose efforts resulted in failure. The term 'Agent' in this context points to the primary actor involved in the event, emphasizing their active role and direct involvement in the unsuccessful attempt to win the election.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "an election", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the election itself, representing the formal process through which a winner is determined. This role highlights the object or mechanism around which the event revolves, indicating the competitive framework within which the agent's actions took place. The election serves as the central point of focus, where the outcome (winning or losing) is decided based on votes or other criteria established by the electoral system.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "46ab373f-a13c-4684-81e1-b680fc261942", "trigger_word": "passed over", "description": "The phrase 'passed over' in this context signifies that Tom Ridge was not selected for a position he may have been considered for, specifically the vice presidency. This indicates a form of prevarication or indirect communication, suggesting that Ridge was omitted from a significant opportunity due to political considerations or personal decisions, rather than being directly informed of his exclusion. This usage highlights the subtle ways in which important decisions can be communicated without explicitly stating refusal.", "sent_id": 9, "offset": [ 32, 37 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent role in this event refers to the person who is the subject of the prevarication or indirect communication. In this case, Tom Ridge, the Secretary of Homeland Security, is the individual who was not directly informed of his exclusion from the vice presidential nomination. His role is crucial as he is the central figure whose potential opportunity was conveyed through indirect means, highlighting the impact of such communication on his career prospects.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Mr. Bush", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The Beneficiary role in this event pertains to the individual or group that benefits from the prevarication or indirect communication. Here, Mr. Bush (presumably George W. Bush) is the one making the decision to exclude Tom Ridge from the vice presidential nomination, and thus he benefits from the indirect manner in which this information is conveyed, potentially avoiding direct confrontation or conflict with Ridge.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "eda39098-4250-4e92-ad47-340a19e94ea6", "trigger_word": "graduate", "description": "In the context of this sentence, 'graduate' serves as a trigger indicating a prevaricative broadcast, where the speaker implies a negative connotation towards Asa Hutchinson's educational background by associating it with a university seen as controversial. This use of 'graduate' is not merely factual but carries a loaded message about the individual’s character or affiliations, thereby serving as a subtle form of misinformation or prejudice.", "sent_id": 10, "offset": [ 48, 56 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Asa Hutchinson", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Asa Hutchinson', who is the primary subject of the misleading statement about his educational background. As the agent, he is indirectly implicated in the act of receiving or being associated with a controversial education, which is presented in a way that may influence perceptions negatively without directly stating false facts.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Bob Jones University", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Bob Jones University, referred to here, acts as the artifact in this event. It is a specific institution mentioned in a way that suggests controversy or disapproval, implying a broader context of criticism or stigma associated with the university. By associating Asa Hutchinson with this institution, the statement aims to convey a negative implication about his background without explicitly stating a falsehood.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "d904e94a-7ed5-4337-a7fb-2d0b9f44eed5", "trigger_word": "turns", "description": "In this context, 'turns' implies a shift or reliance on professional advice or expertise, particularly in critical situations. The verb 'turns' suggests that Mr. Bush seeks out professional guidance only when faced with important decisions or challenges, indicating a pattern of behavior where he defers to experts when matters become too complex or significant to handle alone. This usage of 'turns' reflects a strategic decision-making process influenced by external input.", "sent_id": 11, "offset": [ 12, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Mr. Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this context refers to Mr. Bush, who initiates the act of seeking professional advice. As the subject of the sentence, Mr. Bush is portrayed as someone who relies on experts for critical decisions, suggesting a cautious approach to handling significant issues. The role of the agent here involves the active decision-making process where Mr. Bush chooses to consult professionals rather than making decisions independently.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "professionals", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Professionals, in this scenario, are those individuals or groups providing specialized knowledge or expertise to Mr. Bush. They benefit from this situation by having their skills and insights utilized in high-stakes scenarios. The beneficiary role highlights the positive impact on the professionals, as they are sought out for their valuable contributions during crucial moments, thereby reinforcing their importance and relevance.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "5310c2b9-9cc7-4f70-b984-1a76735d8fd9", "trigger_word": "were", "description": "In this context, 'were' acts as a passive voice verb that indicates the existence or status of individuals as professional politicians within the Clinton administration. It does not directly imply deception but rather highlights the presence and categorization of certain individuals based on their professional background and role in politics. This use of 'were' emphasizes the identification and classification of members of the cabinet, providing insight into the composition of the administration and the nature of their political careers.", "sent_id": 13, "offset": [ 17, 20 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "members of the cabinet", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiaries in this event are the members of the cabinet who are being described as professional politicians. These individuals benefit from the categorization because it underscores their political expertise and experience, potentially enhancing their credibility and influence within the administration. By being labeled as professional politicians, these members are positioned as seasoned players in the political arena, which can strengthen their standing and effectiveness in their roles.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Clinton administration", "role": "Place", "description": "The place in this event refers to the Clinton administration, which serves as the setting or context for the categorization of the cabinet members as professional politicians. This administration is the environment in which these individuals operate and hold their positions, making it crucial for understanding their roles and the nature of their political involvement. The Clinton administration provides the backdrop against which the categorization takes place, highlighting the specific political context and era being discussed.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "d267d83a-b43f-4417-a8bf-9cd823ccf1bf", "trigger_word": "did", "description": "In this context, 'did' acts as a trigger word indicating the completion of an action or achievement. While it doesn't explicitly denote deception, its use alongside positive reinforcement ('hell of a job') implies an acknowledgment of work done. However, given the lack of direct attribution or specifics, it subtly hints at a broader implication that might not align perfectly with the reality of the situation, thus fitting into the prevarication broadcast category.", "sent_id": 14, "offset": [ 18, 21 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "they", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'they,' referring to a group of people whose actions are being acknowledged. The agent performs the act of broadcasting the message by completing a task or job, which is then evaluated positively despite potential underlying issues or inaccuracies. The role of the agent is crucial as it directly engages in the dissemination of information, whether true or misleading.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a hell of a job", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is 'a hell of a job,' which represents the outcome or result of the agent's actions. It serves as a tangible manifestation of the work completed by 'they.' The phrase 'a hell of a job' indicates a high level of performance or effort, yet it could also imply a positive spin on potentially less-than-stellar outcomes, contributing to the overall sense of prevarication or subtle misrepresentation.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "for our country", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is 'for our country,' signifying the entity that is supposed to benefit from the actions of the agent. It suggests that the work done by 'they' is intended to serve the nation or community, creating a positive association. However, the role of beneficiary can also highlight any discrepancies if the actual impact does not align with the positive portrayal, emphasizing the potential for misleading communication.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "6bbe1799-044f-4921-9792-46f925920e4d", "trigger_word": "trying", "description": "The word 'trying' in this context suggests an attempt or effort to mislead or deceive by claiming a particular situation or condition exists. In the sentence, it implies that there is an intention to broadcast a false alarm regarding a high terrorist alert, possibly to create panic or justify actions taken by certain parties.", "sent_id": 15, "offset": [ 33, 38 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "these bozos", "role": "Agent", "description": "The 'Agent' in this event is 'these bozos', which refers to the individuals or group attempting to spread misinformation. The use of the derogatory term 'bozos' suggests a negative perception of these agents, implying they are acting irresponsibly or dishonestly in their efforts to misinform others.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "high terrorist alert", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' in this context is 'high terrorist alert', which is the false information being propagated. This artifact represents the fabricated claim or message that the 'Agent' is attempting to disseminate. It is presented as a serious security concern but is actually part of the deceptive strategy employed by the 'Agent'.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "9ad969ee-8b44-4eb8-8249-d75bb822eb50", "trigger_word": "put", "description": "In this context, 'put' serves as a verb indicating the act of assigning responsibility or control over a particular domain or task. The term suggests an intentional decision-making process where authority or duties are transferred from one entity to another, often implying a change in management or oversight. Here, it conveys the idea that the president has assigned the responsibility of homeland security to certain individuals, potentially with negative connotations regarding their competence or reliability.", "sent_id": 16, "offset": [ 18, 21 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Our president", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'Our president,' who is the primary actor responsible for the action of delegating the responsibility of homeland security. As the agent, the president is initiating the event by making a decision that affects the organization or governance of national security measures. This role highlights the president's authority and the impact of their decisions on the nation's security apparatus.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "homeland security", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Homeland security represents the object or domain over which responsibility is being assigned. In this context, it refers to the broad set of policies, procedures, and organizations dedicated to protecting a country from internal and external threats. The artifact role emphasizes that homeland security is the subject of the presidential decision, highlighting its importance and the potential implications of its management.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "failed Republican hacks", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is 'failed Republican hacks,' who are receiving the responsibility of managing homeland security. The term 'beneficiary' here is used to indicate that these individuals are gaining control or influence over the domain of homeland security, despite the pejorative connotation suggesting their perceived incompetence or past failures. This role underscores the controversial nature of the assignment and the skepticism surrounding the beneficiaries' qualifications.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7bc6edb1-7004-4c6b-8ef0-39530e7be6c1", "trigger_word": "OK", "description": "In this sentence, 'OK' acts as a trigger for the event 'contact.prevarication.broadcast'. It implies acceptance or approval of a situation that might otherwise be contentious or problematic. The use of 'OK' here suggests a form of prevarication or misleading statement, where the speaker is attempting to normalize or justify having professional politicians in key government positions like the Justice Department and Pentagon, despite potential ethical concerns or conflicts of interest.", "sent_id": 18, "offset": [ 6, 7 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "professional politicians", "role": "Agent", "description": "The term 'professional politicians' refers to individuals whose primary occupation is political office-holding and campaigning. In this context, the agent is those professional politicians who are being accepted into or allowed to occupy positions within the Justice Department and the Pentagon. They serve as the primary actors responsible for carrying out actions related to policy-making and governance within these governmental institutions.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Justice Department", "role": "Place", "description": "The Justice Department, also known as the Department of Justice, is a federal executive department in the United States responsible for enforcing federal laws and administering justice. Here, it represents the location where professional politicians are being accepted or permitted to work, which raises questions about the separation of powers and the integrity of law enforcement and judicial processes.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Pentagon", "role": "Place", "description": "The Pentagon is the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, located in Arlington, Virginia. In this context, it signifies another place where professional politicians are being accepted or allowed to work, raising concerns about the influence of politics on military operations and decision-making.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "c22be9c7-7c2c-4bc7-b435-7c3d39f549e6", "trigger_word": "finish", "description": "In this context, 'finish' acts as a trigger indicating an attempt to complete a statement or thought that has been interrupted. It suggests that the speaker wishes to conclude their intended communication without further interruption, emphasizing their desire to convey a full message or idea uninterrupted by others. The use of 'finish' here implies a polite yet firm request for attention, reflecting the speaker's intent to communicate fully before yielding the floor.", "sent_id": 20, "offset": [ 19, 25 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "NOVAK", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the individual initiating the request to allow them to complete their statement. They are actively engaging in the conversation by asserting their right to continue speaking without interruption, demonstrating a desire to express their thoughts fully. The role of the agent is crucial as they are the primary actor seeking to maintain control over the direction and content of the dialogue.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "my sentence", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the incomplete statement or sentence that the agent wishes to complete. It represents the core content of the communication that has been disrupted and is now the subject of the agent's insistence on finishing. As an artifact, it is the object around which the interaction revolves, highlighting the importance of the unspoken portion of the message to the agent.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "52b3f9be-5c1d-4c8a-9892-6568cfc83f9b", "trigger_word": "OK", "description": "In this context, 'OK' serves as an implicit trigger for the event of broadcasting prevarication. It indicates an acceptance or endorsement of the practice of placing certain individuals in positions of power based on their political affiliation rather than merit. The use of 'OK' here suggests a tacit agreement to engage in behavior that could be perceived as biased or unfair, thereby contributing to the spread of misleading information or the perception thereof. This subtle trigger highlights the nuanced ways in which misinformation can be communicated and accepted within political and bureaucratic spheres.", "sent_id": 21, "offset": [ 4, 6 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Democratic career politicians", "role": "Agent", "description": "The term 'Democratic career politicians' identifies the primary actors or agents responsible for the event of broadcasting prevarication. These individuals are characterized by their long-standing involvement in Democratic politics, suggesting a pattern of behavior influenced by party loyalty rather than impartiality or expertise. As agents, they play a crucial role in shaping policy decisions and institutional practices, potentially leading to the dissemination of biased or misleading information within government agencies like the Pentagon and the Justice Department.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Pentagon", "role": "Place", "description": "The Pentagon, as a place, represents one of the key locations where the event of broadcasting prevarication takes place. This iconic building houses the United States Department of Defense and is central to military strategy and defense policies. By involving 'Democratic career politicians' in such a critical institution, there is a risk of skewed decision-making or policy implementation, which could have far-reaching consequences for national security and international relations. The role of the Pentagon in this context underscores the importance of maintaining unbiased governance in high-stakes governmental bodies.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Justice Department", "role": "Place", "description": "The Justice Department serves as another critical location where the event of broadcasting prevarication unfolds. As a central component of the U.S. legal system, it is responsible for enforcing federal laws and ensuring justice and fairness across the nation. The involvement of 'Democratic career politicians' in this department raises concerns about potential bias in law enforcement and judicial processes, which could undermine the integrity of the legal system and public trust in government institutions. This role highlights the delicate balance required in maintaining impartiality within such vital governmental functions.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "bc7c55bd-6f38-4042-93e5-ba2df8feb7d1", "trigger_word": "No", "description": "In this context, 'No' functions as a trigger word indicating a denial or refutation of a previous statement or assumption. The speaker is clarifying a distinction by negating an implied comparison, asserting that Janet Reno's background as a career prosecutor is fundamentally different from whatever was previously suggested or assumed. This negation serves to correct misconceptions and highlight specific aspects of Janet Reno's professional history.", "sent_id": 22, "offset": [ 0, 2 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Janet Reno", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is Janet Reno, who is being discussed in terms of her professional background. The term 'agent' here refers to the person whose actions or characteristics are being highlighted, in this case, her status as a career prosecutor. This role is crucial because it identifies the primary subject of the statement, emphasizing her professional identity and distinguishing it from other potential backgrounds or roles she might have had.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "career prosecutor", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is 'career prosecutor,' which represents the professional identity or attribute of Janet Reno that is being emphasized. This term signifies her long-term involvement and expertise in the legal profession, specifically in prosecuting cases. By highlighting this aspect of her background, the statement aims to underscore her experience and qualifications within the justice system, setting her apart from other possible roles or identities.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "33bca251-8199-4505-98ef-5f50b87d239a", "trigger_word": "wasn't", "description": "The trigger 'wasn't' in this context indicates a comparative judgment being made, suggesting that one individual is considered inferior or less capable compared to another. This usage of 'wasn't' implies a negative comparison, highlighting perceived shortcomings of the subject in question, John Ashcroft, when compared to Janet Reno. It reflects a subjective evaluation rather than an objective assessment.", "sent_id": 24, "offset": [ 13, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "John Ashcroft", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'John Ashcroft' serves as the primary subject of the comparative statement. He is the individual being evaluated negatively against Janet Reno. As the agent, John Ashcroft is the focal point of the subjective judgment being expressed, highlighting his perceived inadequacy in comparison to the other mentioned figure.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Janet Reno", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Janet Reno, in this sentence, is portrayed positively through the comparative statement. She is positioned as superior to John Ashcroft, indicating that she is the beneficiary of the positive comparison. As the beneficiary, Janet Reno is implicitly praised for qualities or achievements that are suggested to surpass those of John Ashcroft.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "6eb4af24-13ac-4cdb-a295-2d6e1173c95c", "trigger_word": "pondered", "description": "Pondered, in this context, indicates that the subject is considering or reflecting deeply on a decision, specifically whether to run for a political position. This verb suggests a process of internal deliberation, where the individual weighs the pros and cons of taking a particular course of action. It highlights the contemplative phase before making a final decision, often seen in high-stakes scenarios like political candidacy.", "sent_id": 25, "offset": [ 8, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Another potential Democratic presidential candidate", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this context is 'Another potential Democratic presidential candidate,' referring to an individual who is being considered for a future role as a Democratic presidential candidate. This person is actively thinking about whether to pursue a candidacy, indicating a significant decision-making process that could impact their political career and the broader landscape of democratic politics.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "88d32a1c-e3c8-49e4-b026-092524814617", "trigger_word": "made", "description": "Made, in this context, signifies the act of officially declaring or announcing a decision, particularly regarding the candidate's intention to run for office. This verb captures the moment when the individual publicly communicates their stance on whether they will participate in the election process, marking a critical point in their campaign strategy and public engagement.", "sent_id": 25, "offset": [ 22, 26 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "his announcement", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact here is 'his announcement,' which represents the formal statement or declaration made by the candidate regarding their decision to run for office. This document or verbal statement serves as the official communication of the candidate's intentions, providing clarity to supporters, opponents, and the general public about their stance on entering the political race.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "67edcd1e-fb4d-4319-a2e7-84a4b9a1dab3", "trigger_word": "announced", "description": "Announced, in this context, refers to the act of publicly revealing or stating information, particularly concerning the candidate's decision about running for office. This verb underscores the official communication of a decision, emphasizing the transparency and directness with which the candidate shares their intentions with the public.", "sent_id": 25, "offset": [ 22, 26 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "the answer was no", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this context is 'the answer was no,' which indicates the outcome or decision that was communicated through the announcement. This phrase specifies the content of the announcement, revealing that the candidate decided against running for the presidency, thus affecting their future political plans and the expectations of those who might have supported them.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "2dbb72f6-ff2d-4aa9-a5ad-c6e35d4e5eda", "trigger_word": "announcement", "description": "In this sentence, 'announcement' refers to the act of publicly declaring Senator Christopher Dodd's decision not to run for nomination. It indicates a formal statement made by a public figure to inform the general public about a significant personal or organizational decision. The term 'announcement' suggests a deliberate and official communication, highlighting the importance of the message being conveyed.", "sent_id": 26, "offset": [ 17, 26 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent in this event is Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who is the primary actor responsible for making the announcement. As the subject of the announcement, he is conveying a significant piece of information regarding his political aspirations. His role as the Agent emphasizes his active participation in the event and his direct involvement in shaping the public narrative around his political career.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "he would not be the 10th candidate for the nomination", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The Artifact in this event is the information that Senator Christopher Dodd would not be running as the tenth candidate for the nomination. This piece of information is central to the announcement and represents the core content being communicated. The Artifact plays a crucial role in informing the audience about the Senator's decision, thereby impacting public perception and political dynamics.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "d92637bd-c8b1-49c0-a439-4e4488a775f0", "trigger_word": "Surely", "description": "In this context, 'Surely' is used to imply a contrast or challenge to a previous doubt or disbelief. It suggests that the speaker believes the following statement is obvious or self-evident, thereby attempting to persuade the listener of the credibility of Chris Dodd over the other mentioned individuals. This word highlights the speaker's confidence in Chris Dodd's credibility despite any initial skepticism.", "sent_id": 27, "offset": [ 5, 12 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Chris Dodd", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is Chris Dodd, who is being portrayed as a credible individual. As the agent, Chris Dodd is the subject of the comparison and the one whose credibility is being asserted by the speaker. This role implies that he is being presented as a trustworthy source of information or opinion.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Carol Moseley-Braun", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Carol Moseley-Braun is considered in this context as a beneficiary, although indirectly. She is part of the comparison that elevates Chris Dodd’s credibility by implying she is less credible. The role of beneficiary here is somewhat paradoxical since the comparison actually diminishes her standing rather than benefiting her directly.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Dennis Kucinich", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "Similar to Carol Moseley-Braun, Dennis Kucinich is also a beneficiary in this indirect sense. By being included in the comparison, his credibility is implied to be lower than Chris Dodd's, thus serving to elevate Chris Dodd’s perceived reliability. The role is again paradoxical, as the comparison is meant to highlight the lesser credibility of Kucinich.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "2541a482-40ac-4a19-8082-478d0868668a", "trigger_word": "explained", "description": "The word 'explained' in this context indicates an attempt by the subject to communicate information or reasoning to others. However, the content of the explanation suggests a prevaricating tone, implying that the true intention behind the statement may be to mislead or distract from other issues. This use of 'explained' is indicative of an effort to justify actions through selective or distorted information.", "sent_id": 28, "offset": [ 0, 8 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "he", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'he' refers to the person who is delivering the explanation or justification. As the agent, this individual is actively engaging in the communication process and is responsible for conveying the information to others. The role of the agent in this event is crucial as it is through their actions and statements that the potential misinformation or prevarication is being propagated.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "homeland security", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Homeland security is presented as one of the areas of focus mentioned in the explanation. In this context, it acts as an artifact or a topic around which the explanation revolves. The mention of homeland security suggests that the agent is attempting to justify their actions or decisions related to national security matters, potentially using this as a reason to support their position or deflect attention from other issues.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "the economy", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Economy is another area highlighted in the explanation, serving as an artifact within the event. By mentioning the economy, the agent is likely trying to convey the importance of their actions in relation to economic stability or growth. This inclusion helps to frame the explanation in terms of broader societal benefits, suggesting that the agent's decisions are driven by a desire to positively impact the nation's economic health.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "judicial nominations", "role": "Artifact", "description": "Judicial nominations are also discussed as part of the explanation, acting as an artifact in the event. This reference indicates that the agent is addressing the selection process for judges or other judicial positions. By focusing on judicial nominations, the agent aims to highlight the importance of maintaining judicial integrity and balance, possibly using this as a justification for their actions or decisions.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "18b18c12-3c7b-4928-9689-e30d0f29eaab", "trigger_word": "say", "description": "In the context of the sentence, 'say' here indicates an act of communication where the speaker conveys a message, which in this case is limited to stating that there is nothing more to be said. The use of 'say' as a trigger word suggests an intentional act of verbal expression, even if it is minimalistic or evasive. This triggers the recognition of a prevaricative broadcast event, where the speaker chooses to limit the information shared, potentially leading to incomplete or misleading impressions.", "sent_id": 32, "offset": [ 12, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the subject of the sentence, represented by the pronoun 'I'. As the agent, this entity is responsible for performing the action of communicating the message, which in this case is a statement indicating a lack of further information. The role of the agent is crucial because it identifies the individual who is conveying the message and thus influencing the perception of the situation.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7c8b3bf8-6b6e-4a60-a130-9ed2c4c32bb9", "trigger_word": "love", "description": "In this context, 'love' signifies a strong positive emotional attachment or admiration expressed towards Senator Dodd. This trigger word represents an overt declaration of affection or support, indicating a favorable disposition or endorsement of the mentioned individual. The use of 'love' here implies a deeper level of connection or respect beyond mere acquaintance or professional relationship, suggesting a personal or passionate regard for Senator Dodd.", "sent_id": 33, "offset": [ 2, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the subject expressing the feeling of love towards Senator Dodd. In this case, 'I' refers to the speaker making the declaration, representing the individual who holds the sentiment and is communicating it directly. The role of the agent is crucial as it identifies the source of the emotion being conveyed, establishing the personal nature of the statement and the direct involvement of the speaker in expressing their feelings.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Senator Dodd", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is the recipient of the expressed affection or admiration. Here, 'Senator Dodd' is the person towards whom the positive emotion is directed, indicating that they are the object of the speaker's feelings. As the beneficiary, Senator Dodd is on the receiving end of the sentiment, highlighting their significance in relation to the speaker's expressed emotions and the nature of the relationship being acknowledged.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "913d98a6-b61c-4c61-ad6b-9f12a890fdf7", "trigger_word": "brought", "description": "The word 'brought' in this context is used to imply that the subject had the potential to contribute significantly to an event, without explicitly stating that he participated. It suggests a hypothetical situation where the subject could have made valuable contributions if certain conditions were met. The use of 'would have' emphasizes the speculative nature of the statement, indicating that the actual contribution did not occur but could have been beneficial.", "sent_id": 34, "offset": [ 7, 13 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is 'He', who is suggested to have had the capability to make substantial contributions to the race. As the subject of the sentence, 'He' is implied to possess qualities or skills that would have positively influenced the race if he had participated. The role of the agent here is crucial in conveying the potential impact of his involvement, even though it remains speculative.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a lot", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The term 'a lot' in this context acts as a beneficiary, implying that the race would have benefited greatly from the subject's participation. It suggests a significant positive impact on the race due to the contributions of 'He'. The beneficiary role here underscores the value and importance of the potential contributions, highlighting how much the race could have gained from the subject's involvement.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "the race", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is 'the race', which is the object that would have been positively affected by the subject's participation. As the focus of the implied contribution, 'the race' represents the scenario or competition that stands to gain from the subject's involvement. The role of the artifact highlights the specific context in which the potential benefits are discussed, emphasizing the importance of the race in the broader narrative or discussion.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "65f629e2-7cca-475a-8350-b41bcf2986fe", "trigger_word": "brings", "description": "The verb 'brings' in this context signifies the act of conveying or contributing something valuable or influential to a setting or discussion. It implies a positive action where the subject is actively introducing ideas, skills, or attributes that enhance or enrich the environment or dialogue. In this specific instance, it denotes the contribution of the subject to the Senate and debates, highlighting the individual's impact and value within these settings.", "sent_id": 35, "offset": [ 0, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent, referred to as 'He', is the primary actor responsible for bringing or contributing something to the Senate and debates. This role highlights the active involvement of the individual in providing beneficial elements such as knowledge, experience, or viewpoints that positively influence the proceedings. The agent's actions are seen as deliberate and impactful, enhancing the quality and direction of discussions and legislative activities.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a lot", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact, described as 'a lot,' refers to the substantial contributions or benefits that the agent brings to the Senate and debates. This term indicates a significant amount or variety of valuable inputs, which could encompass a range of attributes such as expertise, innovative ideas, or persuasive arguments. The use of 'a lot' emphasizes the abundance and importance of these contributions, underscoring their positive impact on the proceedings.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "to the Senate and to the debate", "role": "Place", "description": "The place, specified as 'to the Senate and to the debate,' identifies the locations or forums where the contributions are made. The Senate represents a formal legislative body, while the debate signifies the discussions and deliberations taking place within it. Together, these roles indicate the specific contexts in which the agent's contributions are recognized and utilized, highlighting the importance of the agent's input in shaping legislative outcomes and fostering informed discourse.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "c03ca42d-8fe7-45b7-bc87-bf5f4d570218", "trigger_word": "untroubled", "description": "The term 'untroubled' in this context suggests that Mr. Bush is not concerned or affected by a particular situation, specifically a fiscal collapse. This implies that despite the serious economic downturn, Mr. Bush remains indifferent or unaffected, possibly due to his position of power or wealth which insulates him from the negative consequences.", "sent_id": 41, "offset": [ 18, 27 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Mr. Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'Agent' refers to Mr. Bush, who is the individual expressing indifference towards the fiscal collapse. As the agent, he is actively choosing to remain unconcerned or unaffected by the situation, indicating a level of detachment or immunity from the crisis.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "this fiscal collapse", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' here is 'this fiscal collapse,' which refers to a significant economic downturn or financial crisis. In this event, the fiscal collapse is the subject of Mr. Bush's indifference, representing the potential negative impacts on the economy and society that he appears to disregard.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7e055e7b-90ee-4372-a9be-2f3d5f0549e2", "trigger_word": "tells", "description": "The verb 'tells' in this context indicates that one person is conveying information to another, specifically an aide providing information to a publication. This action signifies a form of communication where information is shared, potentially with the intent to influence or inform the audience. The use of 'tells' suggests a direct interaction, highlighting the personal aspect of the information transfer, which can carry significant weight due to the perceived credibility of the source.", "sent_id": 42, "offset": [ 8, 13 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "One of his aides", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the individual or group responsible for initiating the act of conveying information. Here, 'one of his aides' refers to a subordinate or assistant who is relaying information to a third party, likely to represent or support the views or actions of a higher authority figure. This role underscores the hierarchical dynamics within organizations and the role of subordinates in shaping public narratives or perceptions.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "the current issue of 'TIME', magazine", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this context is the entity receiving the communicated information. In this case, 'the current issue of 'TIME', magazine' represents the medium through which the information is disseminated to a broader audience. This role highlights the importance of media outlets in shaping public discourse and the potential impact of the conveyed information on public opinion and awareness.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "892e7709-f150-47ab-b1ec-69162b9f1542", "trigger_word": "should have known", "description": "The phrase 'should have known' in this context implies a form of prevarication or deception, where the speaker suggests that there was prior knowledge or awareness that was intentionally withheld or ignored. This phrase highlights a situation where information was available but not acted upon, potentially leading to negative outcomes. It reflects a subtle form of communication aimed at shifting blame or responsibility away from the speaker towards those who failed to recognize or address the issue.", "sent_id": 43, "offset": [ 11, 20 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "George W. Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'George W. Bush' acts as the primary agent of the event, implying that he is the subject of the statement and potentially the one engaging in deceptive practices. As the agent, Bush is portrayed as the individual whose actions or behaviors are being scrutinized or criticized for their potential impact on public trust and understanding of his financial dealings. This role highlights his central position in the narrative of the sentence.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "trust fund", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The term 'trust fund' refers to a financial instrument designed to hold assets for the benefit of beneficiaries over time. In this context, the trust fund serves as an artifact involved in the event, suggesting that Bush may be utilizing funds from this source to mitigate personal financial issues or crises. The role of the trust fund as an artifact underscores its importance as a tangible element in the alleged deception or prevarication described by the sentence.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "e80534f4-2bed-4117-9140-c825f04e11d1", "trigger_word": "give", "description": "In this context, 'give' refers to the act of providing or presenting information to the audience. The speaker intends to share two economic facts, but there is an underlying implication that these facts might not be recognized or understood by the audience. This suggests a potential gap between the speaker's knowledge and the audience's comprehension, highlighting the speaker's role in conveying complex information in a potentially unclear manner.", "sent_id": 45, "offset": [ 14, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "two economic facts", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the piece of information or data being shared, specifically two economic facts. These facts serve as the content that the speaker is attempting to convey to the audience. However, the phrase 'even if you won't recognize them' implies that the facts might not be easily comprehensible or recognizable to the listener, suggesting a potential disconnect between the speaker's intention and the audience's ability to understand the information provided.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "you", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this event is the recipient of the information, represented by 'you' in the sentence. This individual is intended to benefit from the economic facts being conveyed, yet there is an implied uncertainty whether the information will actually be beneficial or recognized due to its complexity or presentation. The role of the beneficiary highlights the intended interaction between the speaker and the audience, emphasizing the potential impact of the communicated information on the listener's understanding.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "c88f2b20-fd3e-4d35-8044-f17d7472fb6d", "trigger_word": "don't", "description": "In this context, 'don't' functions as part of the negative construction that implies disagreement or non-concordance between two elements. It suggests that the items or concepts mentioned do not fit well or are incompatible, acting as a trigger for the broader idea of prevarication or communication of a mismatched idea.", "sent_id": 47, "offset": [ 0, 5 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "They", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this context refers to the subject performing the action of negating compatibility or agreement. In the sentence, 'They' indicates a group or individuals who are expressing the lack of fit or coherence between two unspecified elements.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "6107204c-2131-40a7-aa53-7666d475a61a", "trigger_word": "broadcast", "description": "In the context of this sentence, 'broadcast' refers to the act of disseminating information widely, often through media channels or public statements. Here, the speaker is engaging in a form of prevarication, where they are spreading misinformation about the existence of a Social Security fund. This usage highlights the speaker's intention to influence public opinion or beliefs through deliberate falsehoods, emphasizing the deceptive nature of the broadcasted message.", "sent_id": 48, "offset": [ 37, 44 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "there is no Social Security fund", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this context is the false statement about the non-existence of a Social Security fund. This role signifies the object or piece of information being communicated, which in this case is intentionally misleading. The artifact plays a central role in the deception as it is the core message being spread, aiming to alter perceptions or beliefs regarding the actual status of the Social Security fund.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Virginia", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The beneficiary in this context is 'Virginia', representing the intended audience or target of the misinformation. As a beneficiary, Virginia receives the broadcasted message, which is designed to influence her beliefs or actions. This role underscores the impact of the broadcast on the audience, highlighting how the misleading information could shape their understanding or decisions related to the Social Security fund.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "4b07ac45-e213-4cfe-8413-6f16d57d45b5", "trigger_word": "There has been one", "description": "The phrase 'There has been one' in this context implies the existence or occurrence of a singular instance without specifying what exactly it is. However, given the broader context and the sentence's structure, it likely refers to a broadcast or statement made over a period of time, indicating a continuous or recurring act of communication. This phrase serves as a vague yet definitive trigger, suggesting an ongoing event or phenomenon that has persisted for a certain duration.", "sent_id": 51, "offset": [ 0, 12 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "one", "role": "Artifact", "description": "In this event, the term 'one' acts as an artifact, referring to a singular instance of an unspecified but implied event or phenomenon. The role of an artifact here is to represent the subject matter of the broadcast or statement, which could be a piece of news, a claim, or any form of communicated content. The ambiguity in specifying what 'one' refers to underscores the broad nature of the event being discussed, making it a placeholder for various potential scenarios.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "for 60 years", "role": "Time", "description": "The phrase 'for 60 years' indicates the duration over which the event or phenomenon has occurred. In this context, it specifies that whatever 'one' refers to has existed or been communicated for a long period, emphasizing its persistence and longevity. The role of time here provides crucial temporal context, highlighting the sustained nature of the event and its significance over multiple generations or decades.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "136026ab-e353-488a-abe2-2c40449833fd", "type": "contact.prevarication.withhold", "type_id": -1, "description": "The event type 'contact.prevarication.withhold' signifies a situation where an individual chooses to refrain from sharing their opinions or insights on a particular topic until further notice or until more information becomes available. This act of withholding comments can be seen as a strategic decision made to avoid premature judgment or to ensure accuracy by deferring to expert opinions before forming one's own conclusions. It reflects a cautious approach to communication, emphasizing the importance of informed dialogue.", "mention": [ { "id": "f0e5e01e-305d-4430-a3f2-4ec05944bd52", "trigger_word": "withhold", "description": "In this sentence, 'withhold' indicates an intentional act of refraining from sharing personal views or opinions on a given subject. The speaker expresses a desire to hold back their comments until additional input from experts is received, demonstrating a commitment to making well-informed decisions and avoiding potential misinformation. This verb encapsulates a deliberate pause in communication aimed at ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the information shared.", "sent_id": 5, "offset": [ 27, 34 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "In this context, 'Agent' refers to the individual who is taking the action of withholding comments. The agent is the primary actor in the event, choosing to defer their opinion until receiving expert advice. This role highlights the proactive stance taken by the speaker to ensure that any information shared is accurate and based on reliable sources, thereby maintaining credibility and trustworthiness.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "comments", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' in this event represents the object or information that is being withheld. In this case, the artifact is the speaker's comments or opinions on a specific matter. By withholding these comments, the speaker demonstrates a willingness to consider expert opinions before forming and sharing their own views, emphasizing the value placed on informed and evidence-based discourse.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "02ef8029-f785-47c7-8e41-2f25549fa746", "type": "movement.transport", "type_id": 177, "description": "This event type represents the movement of a person or object from one location to another through a means of transportation. It captures the act of traveling or being transported, which can involve various modes such as vehicles, ships, aircraft, or even animals. This event is crucial in understanding the flow of entities across geographical boundaries and often indicates the start or end of a journey.", "mention": [ { "id": "d0fd2c5f-fcb0-4f47-b440-036d75b45061", "trigger_word": "landed", "description": "The verb 'landed' in this context signifies the arrival of a vessel or vehicle at a specific destination, marking the completion of a transit phase. In this sentence, it refers to the Cuban patrol boat reaching American shores, highlighting the successful navigation and arrival of the boat at its intended location. This action underscores the physical transition from sea to land, indicating a definitive point of entry.", "sent_id": 6, "offset": [ 27, 28 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "a 30-foot Cuban patrol boat with four heavily armed men", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this transport event is the Cuban patrol boat accompanied by armed individuals. This role identifies the primary object or entity being moved during the transportation process. Here, it specifies the means of conveyance and the personnel involved, emphasizing the nature of the transported item and the potential threat posed by the accompanying armed men.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "American shores", "role": "Place", "description": "The place in this transport event is the American shores, representing the final destination where the Cuban patrol boat arrived. This role provides the location where the transportation ends, highlighting the significance of the event in terms of crossing national borders and entering a new territory, potentially raising security concerns.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "10897cc3-acf2-40f5-bc12-2ef3f5d83249", "trigger_word": "land", "description": "The term 'land' in this context signifies the arrival or coming ashore of individuals or objects after being transported over water. It implies the transition from a sea or air journey to a terrestrial destination, marking the endpoint of a voyage. In the given sentence, 'land' denotes the act of reaching the shore following a crossing.", "sent_id": 15, "offset": [ 7, 8 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "four armed Cubans", "role": "Agent", "description": "The 'Agent' in this scenario refers to the individuals who are performing the action of landing. Here, the 'Agent' is 'four armed Cubans', indicating that these are the subjects responsible for the movement and arrival at the shore. Their involvement as armed individuals suggests a potentially threatening or dangerous situation.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "our shores", "role": "Place", "description": "The 'Place' role in this event represents the location where the action takes place. In this case, 'our shores' indicates the point of arrival for the 'Agent'. This phrase likely refers to the coastlines of the speaker's country, emphasizing the foreign nature of the 'Agent's' arrival.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "dbd70653-c080-4c19-bdc5-c9b2308d3d9d", "type": "life.elect", "type_id": 194, "description": "This event type refers to the process by which individuals are chosen for a position through a formal voting process. Elections are fundamental to democratic systems, allowing citizens to select representatives or leaders based on their preferences. This event involves multiple participants, including voters, candidates, and sometimes electoral officials. The outcome of an election determines who will hold power in various levels of government or organizations, making it a crucial aspect of governance and public decision-making.", "mention": [ { "id": "dc13b820-ca96-446b-af44-2466e31516f2", "trigger_word": "election", "description": "In this context, 'election' signifies a formal procedure where individuals vote to choose a candidate for a particular office or position. This event highlights the democratic process wherein eligible voters cast their ballots, and the candidate receiving the most votes wins the election. The term 'election' emphasizes the competitive nature of the process and the importance of voter participation in determining the outcome.", "sent_id": 8, "offset": [ 3, 4 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "He", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the person who participated in the election but did not win. In the context of elections, the agent often refers to a candidate running for office. Here, 'He' represents the individual who was competing against another candidate in the election and ultimately lost the contest.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "a dead man", "role": "Victim", "description": "The victim, or in this case, the winning candidate, is referred to as 'a dead man'. This unusual situation implies that the election was won by a deceased individual, which is highly uncommon and suggests potential issues or irregularities in the electoral process. The term 'victim' is used here to highlight the unusual nature of the winning party, emphasizing the unexpected and potentially controversial result of the election.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "1fe67783-c0c2-40e8-833a-dbd9b70ed3f2", "type": "transaction.transfer", "type_id": 192, "description": "This event type describes a situation where one party gives control or possession of something to another. In professional contexts, such as hiring, it involves transferring authority or responsibility over tasks and duties from the employer to the employee. This transfer signifies the beginning of a contractual agreement between the parties involved, establishing roles, responsibilities, and expectations.", "mention": [ { "id": "d7aa4d09-d17d-4280-8485-19957ad8c56f", "trigger_word": "Hire", "description": "In this context, 'Hire' denotes the act of engaging professionals for work or services. It involves offering employment terms and conditions to individuals or groups, indicating a formal agreement to compensate them for their labor or expertise. The verb 'Hire' signifies the initiation of a professional relationship where the hirer (employer) benefits from the hired (employee)'s skills and efforts.", "sent_id": 17, "offset": [ 0, 1 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "professionals", "role": "Beneficiary", "description": "The Beneficiary in this event refers to the group or individual receiving the benefit of the transaction, which in this case is the hiring of professionals. These professionals are expected to contribute their expertise and labor towards achieving certain goals or completing specific tasks, thereby enhancing the operational capacity or project outcomes of the entity doing the hiring.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "Mr. President", "role": "Agent", "description": "The Agent in this event is the individual or entity responsible for initiating the action of hiring. Here, 'Mr. President' is the person making the decision to engage professionals, implying he holds a position of authority and is capable of authorizing such transactions. His role underscores his leadership and the strategic importance of the hiring decision.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "29b6ff31-3243-492a-9a6d-d12e43f54c02", "trigger_word": "declined", "description": "In this context, 'declined' signifies a decrease or reduction in consumer spending. This term indicates a negative trend in economic activity, reflecting reduced consumer confidence or purchasing power. It suggests that consumers are buying fewer goods and services, which can have broader implications for businesses and the economy.", "sent_id": 37, "offset": [ 34, 41 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "consumer spending", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient in this event is the entity affected by the decline in consumer spending. Here, 'consumer spending' refers to the total amount of money spent by individuals on goods and services within an economy. A decline in this spending can indicate weaker economic conditions and reduced consumer confidence.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "January", "role": "Time", "description": "The time role specifies when the event occurred. In this case, 'January' marks the month during which the decline in consumer spending took place. This temporal information helps in understanding the timing and context of the economic change described.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "76aed757-deb4-4ae7-951e-39874a830b59", "trigger_word": "slowed", "description": "Here, 'slowed' denotes a reduction in the pace or rate of activity within the manufacturing sector. This term indicates a deceleration in production, output, or economic growth. Such a slowdown can reflect challenges in the industry, impacting jobs, investments, and economic forecasts.", "sent_id": 37, "offset": [ 50, 55 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "the manufacturing sector", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient in this event is the entity affected by the slowdown in activity. 'The manufacturing sector' refers to the part of the economy that involves the production of tangible goods through manufacturing processes. A slowdown here can affect various aspects of economic performance and job markets.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "February", "role": "Time", "description": "The time role specifies when the event occurred. In this instance, 'February' marks the month during which the slowdown in the manufacturing sector took place. This temporal information is crucial for understanding the timing and context of the economic change described.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7e784254-e484-46c0-9e70-28878d7d7e5c", "trigger_word": "lost", "description": "In this sentence, 'lost' indicates a negative change in employment status, specifically the termination of job positions. It implies a significant shift in the professional lives of those affected, often leading to financial instability and personal stress. The term 'lost' here underscores the involuntary nature of the job loss and the impact it has on the individuals and the economy as a whole.", "sent_id": 38, "offset": [ 20, 24 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "two million Americans", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient in this event is the group of people whose employment status has changed due to the job loss. These individuals are directly affected by the event, experiencing a significant disruption in their livelihoods and possibly facing financial hardship. The role of the patient highlights the direct impact of the event on the individuals involved.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "their jobs", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event refers to the job positions that have been lost. Jobs are tangible elements of employment that individuals hold and perform, providing income and identity. The loss of these artifacts signifies a significant change in the lives of the affected individuals, impacting their daily routines, financial stability, and sense of purpose.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "President Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent in this event is the entity responsible for the condition or situation that led to the job losses. In this case, President Bush is implicated as the leader during the period of job losses, suggesting a connection between his policies or leadership and the resulting economic outcomes. The role of the agent emphasizes the causal relationship between the leader's actions and the consequences faced by the population.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "3d971e5d-fdd6-4030-97f3-666c546bc93c", "trigger_word": "deficit", "description": "The term 'deficit' in this context refers to a shortfall or imbalance where expenditures exceed revenues or income. Specifically, it indicates that the government's spending exceeds its revenue by $300 billion, reflecting a significant financial gap that needs to be addressed through borrowing, reducing expenses, or increasing revenues. This term highlights a critical issue in fiscal management and underscores the need for policy adjustments to stabilize the economy and prevent further financial strain.", "sent_id": 39, "offset": [ 10, 17 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "$ 300 billion", "role": "Artifact", "description": "In the context of a transaction.transfer event, the 'Artifact' role denotes the object or resource being transferred or affected by the event. Here, '$300 billion' represents the magnitude of the financial deficit, indicating the scale of the shortfall in the government's finances. This amount signifies the extent to which government spending surpasses its revenue, highlighting the severity of the financial challenge faced by the entity in question.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "7e0cb85b-d64b-42f2-b0e0-a4d399d795da", "trigger_word": "swell", "description": "The verb 'swell' in this context signifies an increase or expansion, particularly in terms of monetary value. It implies that the cost or expenditure will grow significantly due to the proposed military action. This usage underscores the potential for a substantial rise in financial outlays associated with war efforts.", "sent_id": 40, "offset": [ 8, 11 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "$500 billion", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact in this event is the monetary amount that could potentially increase due to the war. This figure represents the economic burden that might be incurred as a result of military operations, indicating the scale of financial commitment required to sustain such a conflict.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "dbc04079-d1f7-4861-b28a-437d60896943", "trigger_word": "squandered", "description": "In this context, 'squandered' indicates the act of wastefully spending or misusing resources, particularly money or opportunities. This term conveys a sense of negligence or poor judgment in managing valuable assets, leading to their unnecessary depletion or loss. The use of 'squandered' implies that the resources could have been used more effectively or responsibly, highlighting a negative consequence of the action.", "sent_id": 49, "offset": [ 8, 16 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Bush", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent, in this case 'Bush', is the primary actor responsible for the event. As the subject performing the action of squandering, Bush is directly accountable for the misuse of resources. This role highlights the individual's active involvement in the event, emphasizing their responsibility and the potential impact of their actions on others and themselves.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "it", "role": "Patient", "description": "The patient, represented by 'it' in this sentence, refers to the resource or opportunity that Bush wasted. While not explicitly defined, 'it' likely refers to some form of asset or advantage that Bush had but failed to utilize properly. This role underscores the object affected by the agent's actions, illustrating the consequences of the wasteful behavior on the intended benefit or resource.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b2ccbdad-b7ac-4ff5-b1de-4398cf61842f", "type": "life.profession", "type_id": -1, "description": "The event type 'life.profession' signifies an individual's occupation or career path. This type of event is used to denote the professional role or position held by a person, which often reflects their expertise, training, and ongoing work activities. It is commonly found in biographical contexts where the focus is on describing the professional journey of an individual.", "mention": [ { "id": "7b57ecd3-0168-4fe3-af58-20f89bca8865", "trigger_word": "was", "description": "In this context, the word 'was' functions as a passive verb indicating a state or condition that Janet Reno held as her profession. It suggests that she had the role of a career prosecutor, implying a long-term dedication and specialization in legal prosecution.", "sent_id": 19, "offset": [ 8, 10 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Janet Reno", "role": "Patient", "description": "The term 'Patient' here does not refer to someone receiving medical care but rather to the individual whose profession or state is being described. In this case, Janet Reno is the subject of the sentence, indicating that she was a career prosecutor.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "career prosecutor", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The 'Artifact' role in this context refers to the object or thing that the event involves. Here, 'career prosecutor' is the artifact, signifying the professional role that Janet Reno held throughout her career. It indicates her specialization and experience in the field of law enforcement and prosecution.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "6cf04cc1-0578-48df-a61e-c90cca4c9152", "type": "conflict.harass", "type_id": -1, "description": "Harassment involves persistent, unwanted behavior that aims to distress, intimidate, or bother another individual. This can take various forms, such as verbal abuse, stalking, or cyberbullying. In political contexts, harassment might be used as a tactic to undermine or discredit opponents or critics. Harassment is often considered a serious offense and can have legal repercussions.", "mention": [ { "id": "5fd77ffd-eeb2-410a-90c5-acf4a52ed4dd", "trigger_word": "harassing", "description": "The term 'harassing' refers to the act of persistently bothering or intimidating someone through repeated and unwelcome actions or communications. In this context, it suggests ongoing efforts to trouble or distress Tom Ridge, likely as part of a broader political strategy or campaign against him.", "sent_id": 29, "offset": [ 7, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Tom Ridge", "role": "Victim", "description": "The victim is the person who experiences the negative impact of the harasser's actions. Here, Tom Ridge is the target of harassment, implying he faces persistent and unwanted attention or actions aimed at causing distress or discomfort.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "I", "role": "Agent", "description": "The agent is the entity performing the action. In this case, the speaker is indicating that they are responsible for or engaged in the act of harassing Tom Ridge, though the statement is framed as a guess or assumption rather than a direct admission.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b18f3965-5ed6-4cb9-b431-91084f6e14ee", "type": "conflict.fight", "type_id": -1, "description": "Fighting involves engaging in a physical confrontation or struggle with another party, often characterized by aggressive or violent behavior. In political contexts, 'fighting' can metaphorically refer to opposing or contesting policies or ideas, especially those related to contentious issues like tax cuts. Such conflicts can shape public opinion and influence legislative outcomes.", "mention": [ { "id": "329dc1bd-27c4-4c3f-85b7-b49f2e04992e", "trigger_word": "fighting", "description": "In this context, 'fighting' does not imply physical combat but rather a strong opposition or resistance to a particular policy or idea. The speaker indicates that there is an active struggle or contest against tax cuts, suggesting a political battle over fiscal policies and their implications.", "sent_id": 29, "offset": [ 20, 28 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "tax cuts", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact is the object or concept that is the focus of the conflict. In this case, 'tax cuts' represent the policy or idea that is being contested or fought against, symbolizing a broader debate on economic and fiscal matters.", "type_id": null } ] }, { "id": "21f02c5d-da0f-4f62-b622-fb8742238b75", "trigger_word": "fighting", "description": "In this context, the word 'fighting' denotes the act of engaging in a struggle or contest against an opponent. It implies active participation in a conflict, whether physical or metaphorical, with the intention of overcoming challenges or adversaries. The term 'fighting' captures the essence of opposition and resistance, indicating a proactive stance taken by the subject to address or resolve issues. It conveys a sense of determination and effort in facing difficulties or competing against others.", "sent_id": 36, "offset": [ 29, 35 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "he", "role": "Agent", "description": "The role of 'Agent' in this context refers to the individual actively engaged in the fight. The agent is the primary actor who initiates or participates in the conflict, taking direct action to confront or engage with the opposing forces. In the given sentence, 'he' is the person undertaking the fight, demonstrating initiative and involvement in the struggle. This role highlights the active and decisive nature of the agent's participation in the event.", "type_id": null }, { "text": "those fights", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The role of 'Artifact' here refers to the specific fights or conflicts that 'he' is involved in. These fights represent the objects or goals of the agent's actions, signifying the challenges or adversities that need to be addressed. The phrase 'those fights' indicates a pre-existing set of struggles or battles that the agent is prepared to face. This role emphasizes the tangible nature of the conflict and the specific nature of the challenges being tackled.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "06bdc3a2-8a3e-41ea-b76a-2741575a04f5", "type": "conflict.obstruct", "type_id": -1, "description": "Obstruction involves deliberately hindering or preventing progress or completion of an activity, plan, or proposal. In political settings, obstruction can manifest as blocking legislation or delaying processes, often to prevent or alter a desired outcome. This action can significantly impact governance and decision-making.", "mention": [ { "id": "dd683bab-2e82-429b-b6aa-91871ba3bfb0", "trigger_word": "obstructing", "description": "To obstruct means to interfere with, delay, or prevent the progress of something. Here, it signifies an effort to hinder or block President Bush's plans to reform the judiciary, implying that there are forces working against the implementation of these reforms.", "sent_id": 29, "offset": [ 36, 45 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "President Bush's plans to reform judiciary", "role": "Artifact", "description": "The artifact is the specific plan or process that is being obstructed. In this instance, it refers to President Bush's proposals aimed at reforming the judicial system, which are being impeded or delayed by some unspecified actors.", "type_id": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "03599943-c691-48bb-8777-84a1024983c1", "type": "conflict.attack", "type_id": 175, "description": "A conflict.attack event signifies an aggressive act where one party attempts to harm or defeat another through forceful action. This can range from physical confrontations to broader military engagements. In the context of the given sentence, it refers to the potential military engagement against Iraq, highlighting the escalation of tensions into a full-scale war scenario.", "mention": [ { "id": "809ca645-543f-4641-b9dd-c924440377c2", "trigger_word": "war", "description": "The term 'war' in this context indicates a state of armed conflict between nations or other organized groups. It suggests a large-scale military operation involving significant resources and casualties. Here, the use of 'war' implies a serious escalation of hostilities, which could lead to substantial economic and human costs.", "sent_id": 40, "offset": [ 14, 15 ], "arguments": [ { "text": "Iraq", "role": "Victim", "description": "In this event, Iraq is identified as the target of potential military action. As the 'Victim', Iraq would likely face the consequences of such a conflict, including loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and economic hardship. This role highlights Iraq's position as the primary recipient of hostile actions in the hypothetical scenario.", "type_id": null } ] } ] } ]

[]

0

CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05","tokens":["CNN_CF_20030303.1(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.05-4-EV0","type":"Personnel:End-Position","type_id":176,"description":"(...TRUNCATED)

[]

1

CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06 - 1","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-1-7-EV0","type":"Contact:Phone-Write","type_id":187,"description":""(...TRUNCATED)

[]

2

CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06 - 2","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030303.1900.06-2-9-EV0","type":"Conflict:Attack","type_id":175,"description":"This (...TRUNCATED)

[]

3

CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02","tokens":["CNN_CF_20030304.1(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.02-5-EV0","type":"Business:End-Org","type_id":171,"description":"This e(...TRUNCATED)

[]

4

CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04","tokens":["CNN_CF_20030304.1(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.04-6-EV0","type":"Conflict:Attack","type_id":175,"description":"Conflic(...TRUNCATED)

[]

5

CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06 - 2","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030304.1900.06-2-7-EV0","type":"Justice:Arrest-Jail","type_id":185,"description":"T(...TRUNCATED)

[]

6

CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00 - 1","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-1-6-EV0","type":"Conflict:Attack","type_id":175,"description":"","me(...TRUNCATED)

[]

7

CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00 - 2","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-2-4-EV0","type":"Personnel:End-Position","type_id":176,"description"(...TRUNCATED)

[]

8

CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3-0","sentence":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00 - 3","tokens":["CNN_CF_2003(...TRUNCATED)

[{"id":"CNN_CF_20030305.1900.00-3-4-EV0","type":"Personnel:End-Position","type_id":176,"description"(...TRUNCATED)

[]

9