text
large_string
label
int64
split
large_string
FILE_NAME
large_string
projection_x
float32
projection_y
float32
__neighbors
dict
__row_index__
int64
Typically, I'm a comedy guy. I rented this at the video store under comedy, and thought "Albert Brooks! Awesome!" and rented it. It seemed like the romantic comedy, and I remembered I hated those, and had the full mindset of hating this movie.<br /><br />Boy, was I wrong.<br /><br />While this is a romantic comedy, it's acted by an amazing lead & supporting cast (Brooks, Hunter, Cusack, and Nicholson), and everything works well within itself. The script sounds real and not forced, like this could be happening in the news station you're watching at night. It takes your emotions and makes you enjoy Hunter and Brooks and loathe Hurt, which makes the ending a bit unenjoyable and fruitless, but it shows how you don't need a happy ending to end a movie, you just need a truthful ending, which is what everyone got. Not everybody's life ends well, and it shows in Broadcast News. Maybe people don't like the ending because it's not your typical happy ending associated with romantic comedies... but it works, it's real, and it's genius. Broadcast News is a classic in it's time, and a fine romance movie up there with "Casablanca". Well, maybe not that high, but it's the only other romance I can think of that I like.<br /><br />Broadcast News: 9/10.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.00909
11.854776
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2806453046947508, 0.29285564865098423, 0.2996306686803817, 0.30050551093181743, 0.30275532117238735, 0.3038085841557675, 0.30539389020307095, 0.3111149240146883, 0.31222983995206444, 0.31222983995206444, 0.31489632869394635, 0.3151713972361623, 0.3187041254707669, 0.3211499449184694 ], "ids": [ 49700, 31562, 14205, 4323, 32911, 22924, 35520, 41419, 42415, 27433, 2058, 39664, 8258, 33318, 41590 ] }
49,700
Movie watchers often say great movies must have 3 memorable<br /><br />scenes to be considered truly great. Broadcast news doesn't have<br /><br />three, it has twice that. This movie is extremely well written by<br /><br />James Brooks. Holly Hunter and Albert Brooks have never been<br /><br />better. I love this movie for many reasons. It is great because it<br /><br />makes you laugh and it makes you cry. Albert Brooks has several<br /><br />great lines and many unforgettable scenes: # 1(laughed) "I can<br /><br />sing and read, I am singing while I read," with Midnight Train to<br /><br />Georgia playing in the background. # 2(laughed) Telling the<br /><br />William Hurt character that "You really blew the lid off of nookie,"<br /><br />after watching Hurt's report on date-rape. #3 (Cried) When Aaron<br /><br />(A. Brooks) finally tells Jayne (Hunter) that he loves her and she<br /><br />can't end up with Hurt's character because he represents<br /><br />everything about journalism Jayne finds dispicable. Finally, #4 (laughed) who can forget the scene where Aaron<br /><br />anchors the weekend news....hilarious. This movie should have won an Oscar! It has everything I love in<br /><br />movies, great acting, intelligent script, and even a Jack Nicholson<br /><br />cameo!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
1.820757
11.427312
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3420593239473214, 0.3523522597576868, 0.3526778158452335, 0.3618066663125672, 0.3622126389634689, 0.3712631356941276, 0.37191267083358015, 0.3719820813675462, 0.37269367388608543, 0.37340233732361827, 0.37662540627823493, 0.37830668681555657, 0.3833012804913677, 0.38567219971784694 ], "ids": [ 49701, 49690, 49684, 40455, 6039, 49678, 40451, 49682, 40453, 6929, 49691, 49679, 22603, 22602, 49700 ] }
49,701
A truly terrific, touching film. Female melodrama at its finest, with a lot of comedy: great dialogue, characters and writing. Any woman can relate to the story because it's a classic: you're in love with "Mr. Right" but he has no interest in you until some guy who seems completely wrong comes along and you fall head-over-heels in love. But of course, it's not that simplistic. The characters are real and all of the performances are perfect. The movie is hilarious as well, every scene skewers society. I'd recommend this film to anyone who loves a well-written screenplay of humor and melodrama. You can relate to every character and the plot moves in unexpected directions. A great, underrated movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.429556
10.427079
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2990357024589657, 0.3050148362393579, 0.3089241235347534, 0.3099316615322396, 0.31449311978973904, 0.3162808214480318, 0.3166964167139841, 0.32248779149678586, 0.3231367381433493, 0.323174209488556, 0.32430137780289636, 0.3258720215409002, 0.32612854034388694, 0.32624376380661246 ], "ids": [ 49702, 14614, 48279, 22707, 42867, 26336, 15420, 46615, 22700, 22869, 24732, 42417, 39657, 43516, 44940 ] }
49,702
I loved this movie the first time I saw it. It gives such detail of what executives involved in the news industry will do just to get a story on the air: notably Jane Craig rushing Kenny to finish editing the piece to get it off, and then Joan Cusack struggling to get it in, and William Hurt, who according to Jane commits an incredible breach of ethics, fakes his tears during his date rape interview, a flaw that is pointed out by Aaron. Another high point is when Tom uses Jane for his own benefits, and then turns around and sleeps with Jennifer. The script is brilliant, and the directing is almost as good. All three main actors were great in the portrayals of their characters, Especially Holly Hunter, and Albert Brooks, whom is the funniest in the film. William Hurt is also very good. This deserved at least three Oscars, best actress(holly hunter), best supporting actor (Albert Brooks), and best picture. I liked the last parts of the film where it shows them reuniting 7 years later.<br /><br />8/10
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.52237
10.740116
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.26478019628696603, 0.2714428873892367, 0.28538952983480403, 0.2987560070412648, 0.30270101877052735, 0.3075300552237352, 0.32336349196008474, 0.32675411230354146, 0.3393349687698516, 0.3407450895706101, 0.3447278038985747, 0.34616874484121285, 0.3466910736681911, 0.3491920407473459 ], "ids": [ 49703, 49695, 49696, 49684, 49698, 26720, 49697, 49679, 32401, 2407, 12965, 49705, 20963, 20054, 7824 ] }
49,703
This movie has everything going for it: Fully developed characters, a realistic portrayal of working Washington, bathed in warmth and humor that is uniquely Albert Brooks. The dumbing down of network news is even more of an issue now than it was in 1987. Remember, this was pre-cable! So satisfying to care about complex people attempting to achieve complex goals -- and it all moves along with lightning speed. Such a true to life depiction of friendships that teeter toward romance. See if you can spot John Cusack as the angry messenger! And do you recognize Peter Hackes from real life Broadcast News? Finally, if you're from DC, see if you agree with Holly Hunter's directions to cab drivers!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
2.301169
11.275532
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2858278707679781, 0.3822702616112159, 0.40996681690785974, 0.410909578502203, 0.4113476482303833, 0.4186746780620275, 0.45336758570071656, 0.45494257919915826, 0.45515011920758763, 0.4583111156016012, 0.46586287093279655, 0.4687578131554063, 0.46985923561345433, 0.4717511978116946 ], "ids": [ 49704, 49692, 49693, 49691, 49681, 49689, 49685, 49684, 49698, 40560, 32586, 7124, 29052, 467, 42013 ] }
49,704
Spoiler Alert <br /><br />I have never seen comments on a movie, that I disagree with more then the comments people made on this. One could learn from critical viewings of this movie. As an educational film, I rate it highly because it teaches "how to succeed"! We do not watch movies to learn; we generally watch for entertainment. As entertainment, I rate it low: the ending is downbeat and cerebral/intellectual. This conflict results in my eight star rating. The movie follows Jane Craig (Holly Hunter), a television news producer. The network executive introduces Tom Grunnick (William Hurt), to study for the on air news anchor position. Tom immediately charms people with humbleness. Another potential news anchor has been waiting for years for his on air opportunity, Aaron Altman (Albert Brooks). Altman knows all news stories, inside and out.<br /><br />The Network executive wants Grunnick on the air and Jane argues, saying Grunnick is not ready, he doesn't know the news. They do not listen to her. Forced to place Grunnick on the air, Jane contacts Altman to get information on the news story and relays Altman's comments through an earpiece to Grunnick while Grunnick speaks. We watch the sharp contrast between Altman's/Jane Craig's words and Grunnick's, as Grunnick skillfully rewords everything Altman and Jane Craig say in his ear, in order to make it understandable, likable and entertaining the audience. Altman gets a chance on air and the network execs require him to seek coaching from Grunnick, the new guy. This new (news ingnorant) guy coaching him? This is something Altman does not see justified, but agrees reluctantly. <br /><br />Grunnick coaches Altman and gets excited noting hundreds of Altman's shortcomings in appearance, audio and vocabulary. Altman never considered these things before, when he became an expert on the news itself. The complexity of understanding what Grunnick taught him, causes Altman to have a panicked sweating attack ("Flop Sweat") when he is on the air. Grunnick eventually becomes the top network anchor and Altman resigns prior to being fired. But Grunnick fails in his attempt for a romance with Jane Craig, because she finds out from Altman, that Grunnick sometimes fakes circumstances in order to make people like him. This turns her off of him. This sends the message that in relationships, we want people who are genuine and not trying to make us like them. <br /><br />This movie sends the message that getting people to like you is the most important skill in a job, but it is especially true in Broadcast News. There are many people commenting on how this is the dumbing down of TV News and how Grunnick represents a good looking, but dumb guy or all style, but no substance. The opposite is true, Grunnick possessed skills and very complex intellect, to get people to like him, including the presence of mind to know exactly how he appears and sounds, when he is on camera (He coaches Altman to Punch a word in every sentence). Grunnick's flaw that costs him the relationship with Jane Craig, is that he is too driven to be likable and will fake a situation. Many people are calling Altman very intelligent or brilliant. Altman played by Brookes is not as intelligent as Grunnick and the "Flop Sweat" scene shows that his mind could not handle the complexity that Grunnick handles when on the air. Altman is angered by this fact that he knew the news and Grunnick suceeded more by getting people to like him. There are also people commenting that these things are exclusive to the TV News industry. The concept that winning friends is the most important skill in a job, is obviously, not popular, but my experience indicates it is true in most jobs. As an education on how to succeed, this movie is fantastic, albeit unpopular. Educational, yes, but it does not have an uplifting ending.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
2.120614
11.16084
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24741218012429167, 0.28568525464780226, 0.32352700951185165, 0.34174455476847443, 0.3447278038985747, 0.3971149747374675, 0.4141189886846648, 0.4291103932713384, 0.4346677858531903, 0.4381296129272355, 0.4463556706498252, 0.44872781501183023, 0.4657903954789291, 0.46697364279900644 ], "ids": [ 49705, 49694, 49698, 49696, 49687, 49703, 49693, 49686, 49685, 49684, 27919, 29873, 49688, 49697, 22353 ] }
49,705
Or maybe not. Whatever anyone thinks of "Broadcast News," good or bad, almost all the credit for that "thinking" belongs to writer-producer-director James L. Brooks. As a screenwriter (of which he has long been one of the best), it is not easy to savage an entire business -- in this case, the "business" being television news -- but to do it with a smile, a wink, a knowing nod and a laugh practically every step of the way. To do all that takes real talent, something Mr. J. Brooks has in abundance.<br /><br />One user on this website, in his summary, asked the musical question -- "Did Walter Cronkite act like this?" Answerve: No! Of course not! And the reason for that is in Walter's -- uh, Mr. Cronkite's -- day, the only thing that mattered was bringing the news to the people. Same goes for John Chancellor and Chet and David and Douglas Edwards and Howard K. Smith. Sure, they had to pay lip-service attention to their ratings, if only to please their bosses. But all they REALLY cared about was THE NEWS ITSELF.<br /><br />Now, of course, all that has changed. For the last 25-30 years in the network news business, the only thing that has really mattered is ratings, ratings, ratings. The bottom line. How many bucks will our news division deliver for the network? Don't believe that?<br /><br />Let's consider "The Big Three": Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings (aka "Stanley Stunning"). All three have now been on the job at their respective anchor desks for the last 15-20 years (Peter actually got his first shot at the national anchor desk way back in the 1960s but was totally unprepared for the job). Of the three, Dan is the one with the greatest in-the-field training as a reporter. Personally, I think all three do terrific jobs as news anchors and are deserving of their positions. All of which has nothing to do with why all three are actually IN those jobs. All three are now in their 60's (Dan is pushing the big 7-0) and all three are still very good looking. And if you think they're still good looking now, imagine how good looking they were in their 40's, when all three were hired for (let's say, "put in") their current jobs. But do you honestly believe that any one of these three would have been "put in" had he looked like, let's say, Fred Gwynne ("Herman Munster"). Or like -- heaven forfend -- ME!!! Not only that, if Dan were retiring tomorrow, a younger (than he is today) Walter Cronkite would not be able to get his old job back. Why? Not pretty enough. And it would matter not a whit that he is, or once was, "the most trusted man in America." <br /><br />And this is what "Broadcast News" is all about. Tom Grunnick (William Hurt), the next pretty-boy-national-news-anchor-to-be who has trouble with a few minor things, such as thinking for himself, being able to write and knowing stuff. Jane Craig (Holly Hunter), the brilliant news producer with news business standards and ethics, all of which get thrown to the wind when even she falls for pretty-boy-Tom. And Aaron Altman (Albert Brooks, no relation to James L.), a top-notch newswriter and field reporter who has no hope for a national job because he "flop-sweats" behind the anchor desk. And many other such flawed characters whom you KNOW really do exist in the news divisions of the various networks.<br /><br />"Network" blazed the trail. Eleven years later, "Broadcast News" carried the torch as a worthy successor. In the new millennium, what will be the next movie to savage the business of network "news you can use" ..... maybe. Or maybe not.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
2.378717
11.357506
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.29601349413876965, 0.32455980583416355, 0.360038382107165, 0.3845765997052236, 0.43531548962668876, 0.4546413502917993, 0.4676420496611081, 0.4693725982329128, 0.474669443876061, 0.47566568475448545, 0.47922491602329276, 0.48985635952294937, 0.49679635347251805, 0.5015897806056765 ], "ids": [ 49706, 49685, 49689, 49683, 49681, 49682, 39247, 31829, 26523, 12135, 49692, 9964, 49693, 49704, 23905 ] }
49,706
I was completely drawn into the story, but I wonder if perhaps I shouldn't have been so sympathetic to the Hurt character's plight for respect. Because when it boils down, I really think that glam reporters such as Barbara Walters is the devil. ...or maybe the filmmakers were telling us that we're all unknowing supporters of fluff news stories.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.590282
12.349328
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4040569530564142, 0.412107839446069, 0.41397487531333643, 0.4238068975983542, 0.4258687615521142, 0.42949537863311094, 0.4329207991958851, 0.4349299027080532, 0.4377410461666812, 0.4408885038314715, 0.4412407768232455, 0.4426298966424953, 0.4443735559369446, 0.44507133466597926 ], "ids": [ 49707, 31008, 36176, 1451, 5956, 39922, 720, 6515, 35314, 6512, 2435, 35717, 2027, 1429, 7954 ] }
49,707
Early 80's creature feature concerns a long abandoned gold mine that some intrepid miners are determined to check out. Naturally, they find no gold down there but one very hungry monster that slithers along in search of prey.<br /><br />While I have to be honest and admit I found it dull at first (I personally prefer the thematically similar "The Boogens"), it actually grew on me as it went along. Now, the characters aren't too interesting nor the actors either. The closest to an interesting character is Morgan, played by Keith Hurt. In any event, female lead Terri Berland is quite good looking and Rolf Theison makes his domineering jerk an easy person to hate. The writer played by effects man Mark Sawicki wears thin quickly.<br /><br />It begins in a comfortably predictable enough way, with a nighttime set piece in which two victims are claimed to get things off to an acceptable start. The monster itself is intriguing for its design (as you can imagine, it gets revealed a bit at a time until late in the game) and for being the product of stop motion animation when this process was no longer used very much. Director Melanie Anne Phillips (directing under the pseudonym of David Michael Hillman) and crew deserve some credit for their creation of atmosphere. They manage to make the film look quite claustrophobic and gloomy, and their use of lighting works well. The film does build in intensity towards a pretty good ending. Suffice it to say, they do the best they can on their low budget.<br /><br />An obscure little item worth looking into for die-hard horror buffs.<br /><br />7/10
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.913759
14.529367
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.41008971343490275, 0.42412715645594146, 0.42828392534599047, 0.4411717714354575, 0.4419328523225835, 0.4478828731188168, 0.4496880892458034, 0.4579971484675125, 0.4623516982650929, 0.4628690303065228, 0.4645183138924637, 0.46708902492250826, 0.4674960317568291, 0.46791374135610353 ], "ids": [ 49708, 7706, 7846, 47622, 8002, 552, 18370, 32203, 14424, 1735, 19986, 2737, 12186, 47633, 28769 ] }
49,708
Basically an endearingly chintzy and moronic $1.50 version of the nifty early 80's subterranean creature feature favorite "The Boogens," this entertainingly schlocky cheapie centers on a nasty, squirmy, wriggling monster who makes an instant meal out of any unfortunate souls foolhardy enough to go poking around the notoriously off limits Gold Spike Mine. Your standard-issue motley assortment of intrepid boneheads -- hectoring hard-nosed mine boss, cute, but insipid blonde babe, feisty lady geologist, boozy, inexplicably Aussie-accented (!) seasoned old mine hand, charmless doofus, hunky, jolly guy, and, arguably the most annoying character of the uniformly irritating bunch, a nerdy bespectacled aspiring writer dweeb who's prone to speaking in flowery, melodramatic utterances -- trek into the dark, uninviting cave in search of gold. Naturally, these intensely insufferable imbeciles discover that the allegedly abandoned mine is the home of a deadly, ugly, multi-tentacled beast who in time honored hoary B-flick fashion proceeds to gruesomely bag the group one at a time. Directed, co-written, co-produced and co-edited with dumbfounding maladroitness by Melanie Anne Phillips, acted with dismaying flatness by a rank no-name cast, further marred by lethargic pacing, a drably meandering narrative, murky, under-lit, eye-straining cinematography, a shivery, redundantly thudding pseudo-John Carpenter synthesizer score, and a cruddy, herky-jerky stop motion animation wormoid thingie that's only quickly glimpsed at the very end of the movie, this extremely clunky, amateurish and hence quite delectably dreadful would-be scarefest commits all the necessary bad film missteps to qualify as a real four-star stinkeroonie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.115424
14.562548
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4147905738009846, 0.4623833506124889, 0.49104913509536363, 0.49570347765662426, 0.4981153532362209, 0.5021584050592883, 0.5040813891656375, 0.5080004042206925, 0.5080449993318947, 0.5093849881340831, 0.5093957714730524, 0.5151240366891718, 0.5175997675931974, 0.5204837114507449 ], "ids": [ 49709, 45712, 18371, 12336, 45713, 49474, 11805, 18424, 40951, 12160, 37982, 21050, 36019, 44488, 7841 ] }
49,709
I think that this is a fabulous movie... I watched it constantly from the time I was 4 to about the time I was 8... However, watching it resulted in many nightmares. I particularly got them because of the guy that was always like "the otherworld" and his friends. I am 12, and I still get nightmares about it to this day. I can't fall asleep right now because I am thinking about it. I love this movie, but it is so scary! I definitely love this movie though, I have very good memories from it. Kate is very good at acting in this movie. Amazingly, I never realized that it was her! I also think that the graphics were very high quality, contrary to what some other people think
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.988702
14.045565
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2784519462045586, 0.279810387269116, 0.29033703233419483, 0.3202006914915363, 0.3249778150051583, 0.3256442417047959, 0.3277162964054864, 0.3310854917843078, 0.33132969472596363, 0.33135303826671036, 0.335470907956702, 0.3365279578222099, 0.339234951447831, 0.3406923839092235 ], "ids": [ 49710, 49005, 24640, 43990, 49007, 23998, 29742, 43658, 36731, 21492, 2006, 1070, 23217, 26062, 33561 ] }
49,710
In the changing world of CG and what-not of cartoon animations etc. etc., Faeries was a warm welcome at least by me. I think it's important to show these sort of films once in a while, to preserve them and help remind us of where the originality and fun of cartoons actually came from. People were talking about how it is boring because of the graphics and stuff but hey! think about the films that will be considered boring if every film looked like the new state of the art ones everybody and their mother is making these days. Call me old-fashioned but I liked it. It's a wonderful story about supernatural beings and human beings and all it really needs from its audience is their imagination.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
2.301711
12.98807
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.39014272712273046, 0.41584983492738603, 0.4235306899618214, 0.42659229053810255, 0.43564641947473237, 0.43777860719370176, 0.44036435994514067, 0.4435911841214877, 0.4677405528271472, 0.46835513135844875, 0.47285593153859484, 0.4734168302556946, 0.47419871376636746, 0.481181249231984 ], "ids": [ 49711, 20023, 41525, 27456, 15966, 27245, 15381, 13033, 20025, 20672, 41654, 18801, 42779, 41517, 3775 ] }
49,711
I cannot argue with other comments that the story line focuses more on the romance between the Mary Martin and Allan Jones characters, much in the manner of "Showboat", than on the life of Victor Herbert. But in the 1930's, would that have been a box office draw? Instead of the Life of VH, perhaps it should have been the Music of VH. There is an abundance of this.<br /><br />For me, the thrill of the movie came near the end of the movie when Susanna Foster sings "Land of Romance". It has been over a decade since I caught this movie for a second time at a local 'old movies' theater. At first the audience was stunned; then it burst into spontaneous applause. I remember the shivers running up and down my spine. My trivia memory recalled the information provided to an inquiring public by a local journalist when the movie first came out back in the late 1930's. 'That note hit by Miss Foster was a far F above high C.'<br /><br />She may not have had four octaves a la Yma Sumac but the then teen-ager certainly had a range!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.190483
9.607608
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3730325511567052, 0.3821647217094448, 0.3852176895184195, 0.3873522155540643, 0.39286594886596826, 0.4063358865449125, 0.4071234442345145, 0.41016886844637357, 0.41074149961727224, 0.4150023330543867, 0.41515295938920704, 0.4190473796197388, 0.4215742406258268, 0.4224776977365464 ], "ids": [ 49712, 24533, 14617, 10588, 421, 49653, 45752, 40119, 31911, 46024, 39534, 49713, 1395, 17497, 29327 ] }
49,712
Now I like Victor Herbert. And I like Mary Martin and Allan Jones. But it would have been nice to see a real biography of Victor Herbert. Walter Connolly as Herbert does have a decent resemblance to him in his latter years<br /><br />Jones and Martin sing beautifully though. The Herbert music is just there to adorn the plot line concerning these two musical performers. Jones's John Ramsay is a frail character, very similar to Gaylord Ravenal in Showboat who Jones also played.<br /><br />As for Mary Martin, it's a mystery why she never had a good Hollywood career. She did films with Bing Crosby and Dick Powell as well as this one. She performed well, but movie audiences didn't take to her. The best musical moment in the film is Jones and Martin in a duet of Thine Alone. The recordings I have of the song are individual and it was written as a duet. There's also a pleasant scene with Jones and Martin riding bicycles swapping Herbert songs as they ride.<br /><br />The real Victor Herbert with his womanizing and his Irish patriot background and his musical training in Germany where he developed a love for all things German would have been a fascinating study. He was also a cello virtuoso before he turned full time to composing. I have to take strong exception to the reviewer who said Cuddles Sakall would have been a good Victor Herbert. Sakall as Irish, HELLO.<br /><br />Nice movie, but the real Vic would have been so much better.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.919731
9.238729
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.41515295938920704, 0.4207791732012187, 0.44795013749217527, 0.47697795144353594, 0.4788994967968183, 0.48544524940277645, 0.4861398553322429, 0.4947860124219222, 0.4947874735165477, 0.4972580067447806, 0.4980219736766579, 0.49875174997012783, 0.498929753345017, 0.5000779549339087 ], "ids": [ 49713, 49712, 21176, 21634, 12081, 2600, 9459, 21629, 47684, 6228, 21635, 39637, 48039, 46739, 21172 ] }
49,713
Challen Cates does a wonderful job depicting a conflicted bride, torn between the challenges that await her professionally, the memories of the freedom she thought she would have when in college (inspired by a famous author) and the safety of her pending marriage to a man she really doesn't love. This movie is definitely worth seeing--- as predictable as it may be, the acting is inspiring and real chemistry exists between Challen Cates and Malcolm Jamaal Warner.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.520682
10.254877
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.19326708970557427, 0.40696798130619594, 0.43320292839246666, 0.43382655718293206, 0.4360030904542537, 0.436173910553185, 0.4481355111707913, 0.45106745729116715, 0.4524915963032399, 0.45748406735718583, 0.4582264015740315, 0.45834578074571963, 0.4586953069690063, 0.46025664464009963 ], "ids": [ 49714, 49719, 31457, 18480, 19935, 48052, 14602, 18475, 44886, 41856, 17512, 41214, 39370, 34338, 6627 ] }
49,714
This movie was a suprise for me while I was surfing from channel to channel... I don't know why but it filled in me with warmth and happiness. This is what a high budget movie can not do mostly. I liked it, this is "a must see" one...<br /><br />
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.282967
10.873603
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3157643995192003, 0.3226125371265205, 0.3230819535403696, 0.32422384965803874, 0.32667700467095095, 0.3284232492370672, 0.33100089244487885, 0.3312447670883266, 0.3331039354572686, 0.3332203077885505, 0.33369536667698807, 0.3344633744546641, 0.335195890432073, 0.33726217167616257 ], "ids": [ 49715, 45000, 39521, 44940, 20009, 47674, 45610, 42104, 39724, 39581, 47041, 23240, 41520, 42686, 12079 ] }
49,715
Most Christmas movies have a "redemption" theme but most are a variation on a very similar plot. This movie is wacky and has an unusual plot. You may need to hang in there for the first half where events may seem hard to believe for a movie (but not as unbelievable as real life - Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert, says he's never made up anything in any of his cartoons - they're all based on real life stories told to him by his fans). The second half starts to fit the plot together. I enjoyed it. <br /><br />BTW, one reviewer noted that the idea of someone not having cash available is not credible in these days of ATMs, but it's perfectly credible if you've lost your wallet - who carries ATM cards anywhere else while on a business trip?
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-5.534527
13.136646
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3853190509769916, 0.3888341249442986, 0.3921732964036694, 0.3932380756488236, 0.39739786401220556, 0.39855296836577925, 0.4014842304876467, 0.4076166086641254, 0.4076926940537775, 0.4157283315240312, 0.41763887343480766, 0.41925296782311594, 0.42145734594939355, 0.42311453335915494 ], "ids": [ 49716, 42691, 8319, 23495, 23494, 32525, 32524, 32633, 38255, 6788, 4255, 11539, 4253, 8212, 13489 ] }
49,716
"A Fare to Remember" is a totally derivative, almost ridiculous movie, but has a warmth about it that makes it a very effective and upbeat holiday movie. It stars a pretty newcomer, Challen Kates, as a high-powered ad executive who, right before her wedding, has to rush from L.A. to Seattle to keep a client who has rejected every other presentation. She has transportation difficulties from the beginning and seemingly no money. This is the first dumb thing - were there no ATMs anywhere? She must make a fortune. At any rate, she meets a cab driver (Warner) who looks like a homeless man, and he drives her to her presentation and when she emerges with a huge box of beef jerky (the client's product), he's there to take her to the airport. All flights are canceled, so in order to get to L.A. for her wedding, she hires him to take her there.<br /><br />Along the way, they bond and learn from each other. It's a very sweet movie though there is absolutely nothing new in it - it combines "Six Days and Seven Nights" and a few other films. But the chemistry between the stars is good, they're likable, and the acting is good. Look for Jerry Springer as the head of the beef jerky company and a cameo by Karl Malden.<br /><br />This is a nice film to take in over the holiday season. It's on Lifetime.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-2.084807
10.908017
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.41994399939398974, 0.43115436014322295, 0.4393236549078804, 0.4442102947506257, 0.4598449525747823, 0.4622687269529645, 0.4626599017259784, 0.46441089442910766, 0.4649152580620478, 0.4673931044522137, 0.4696839635023903, 0.47056947867914745, 0.4706860287259226, 0.4709204508181083 ], "ids": [ 49717, 2388, 29882, 20194, 39127, 24047, 27586, 1799, 7209, 25578, 78, 32705, 39991, 46084, 24043 ] }
49,717
A tender movie that represents how our daily life is a catalyst that causes us to change our thoughts, behaviors and emotions into people we're not. This story is a love story where true emotions arise. I credit Malcolm Jamal Warner (Win) and Challen Cates for outstanding performances . A movie definitely worth seeing, a holiday roadtrip that turns into an emotional turn-a-round. I suggest seeing it.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.06556
10.441938
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3394657546033977, 0.36181713385604997, 0.36378587515641114, 0.3644927866482285, 0.36656725500247056, 0.37043811242918445, 0.3707064286658005, 0.37094840805633345, 0.3727167655348419, 0.3771127243600729, 0.3790172191748009, 0.3806778225408699, 0.38084480746165406, 0.3813370062929987 ], "ids": [ 49718, 45125, 25049, 39380, 39365, 24666, 39375, 16725, 40182, 31911, 12651, 49715, 38707, 44672, 19435 ] }
49,718
I came across this movie while channel surfing one day; and decided to give it a chance. To my surprise I enjoyed this darkhorse movie. I felt some genuine chemistry between Challen Cates and Malcolm-Jamal Warner. It was such a lighthearted and warm movie that when it was over I felt upbeat. Sure, this movie was predictable from the very beginning, but I give it high marks for the way that it made me feel when it was over. I must admit that I have never seen Challen Cates before, but I feel that she can definitely act. When you combine her good acting with her cute face and attractive figure. She has the makings of at least becoming a well-known star.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.428831
10.482456
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.19326708970557427, 0.4284120512793028, 0.4311576738787689, 0.45889527029857835, 0.4686822622163421, 0.47196721607335224, 0.47483898925616874, 0.47516759470761516, 0.4763172853779283, 0.47714901993528536, 0.4815423442545821, 0.48199948038037355, 0.48414109883869283, 0.4843704140874705 ], "ids": [ 49719, 49714, 31457, 31454, 41421, 10, 31452, 13422, 38710, 33252, 14501, 41214, 20172, 18475, 20545 ] }
49,719
There is no denying it. Sci-fi on TV is difficult. There are so many problems that the genre brings with it. Like the need for a good budget, solid writing, decent acting. Perhaps the budget and the script writing is the departments where i feel most attempts have failed. So does "Surface" succeed? Not completely, but more so than most.<br /><br />The way i see it, a good sci-fi show doesn't really need a lot of CGI to work, nor does it need a ton of money. What it needs is the capacity to create a larger-than-life feeling. The feeling that there is more than meets the eye, something to make me curious and willing to try and figure out how it's going to end. Adding the pieces of the puzzle and sometimes saying "Aha!" is what makes or breaks a show like this one.<br /><br />"Surface" had a couple of flaws. First of all it's basic premise is not as exciting as it could have been, nor is the revealed story as exciting (or daring) as i hoped in the beginning. Also the TV-feeling is very present much of the time. All the way from the crappy CGI (that ranges from decent to awful) to the rather shifting quality in the acting department. Also it feels sometimes a bit too family-oriented in that it takes the edge of sometimes and becomes almost cutesy. But aside from these flaws it's an enjoyable show. Maybe not as spectacular as some of the other sci-fi shows out there. But it manages to keep me interested the whole season and it offers a couple of nice cliffhangers between shows as well. The ending for me is not that appealing. I don't like shows that end without ending so to speak, leaving the story unresolved. It's especially unfortunate in this case since the show seems to be canceled after the first season (it is as of yet undecided).<br /><br />HBO is to me the benchmark for quality television. Their series have the best actors, the best production values and above all the most solid writing. This is not HBO-quality, but it's good for what it is. Good enough to want another season without a doubt.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.794456
12.775475
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2537654810139891, 0.27603385533542135, 0.2999127919393654, 0.32168601120299223, 0.3521612102820897, 0.3553432079148152, 0.36754562833087123, 0.3786091070073986, 0.3794088080147676, 0.3924759239046304, 0.3995665350095473, 0.4143392903937312, 0.4230426458297397, 0.4251246542416883 ], "ids": [ 49720, 49734, 49740, 49725, 49726, 49729, 49730, 25000, 43063, 368, 49747, 49749, 49728, 49739, 26243 ] }
49,720
This is one of the better sci-fi series. It involves character development, a few really tensionate moments and reasonable episode scripts. As one other commentator said here, it looked as if it were a mini series, not a full blown series with filler episodes and low budgets.<br /><br />The problem with the show, which in short is a Godzilla series, is that it started too big, with incredible monsters, fantastic science, then it all boiled down to local Americans doing stuff. Then, the show ended too soon, since the Olympics were coming and hey! a sci-fi show is a sci-fi show, but half naked athletic people running around aimlessly is much more important. So they only did 15 episodes instead of the expected 22. The audience was small, too, as people didn't really caught it on at 20:00. In the end the suits did it. Trust a marketing plan to destroy anything that looks remotely original and promising.<br /><br />Conclusion: you have a show with good special effects, stuff like huge monsters killing people or destroying boats, then going into genetic engineering, transforming people, human clones, end of the world, tsunamis. Also, the only fillers are scenes with aggressive rednecks or other annoying people being killed for their stupidity. The down-side is that after 15 episodes that prepare something huge, the show ends. No real ending, no closure, just a bitter taste of cloth in one's mouth, as if you just swallowed a piece of suit.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
3.542924
12.770998
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.44359552882030917, 0.444817729672326, 0.4482043633774938, 0.45275435728260904, 0.46675846770377705, 0.46888494363318767, 0.4696311799351497, 0.4723204445701432, 0.47397145993838286, 0.47516455903104216, 0.47630726788720057, 0.4776674574534713, 0.4802846256200952, 0.48175797707727197 ], "ids": [ 49721, 27638, 27633, 23683, 45935, 49748, 368, 18809, 19469, 30184, 35202, 29213, 10542, 35323, 9775 ] }
49,721
I love this show. It's truly unique. I was under the impression it was going to have more seasons. In anticipation of series 2, recently I purchased series 1 to re-watch it in order to be refreshed when part 2 started. Now after watching it I was excited and craving more, so I came to the site to see the schedule for the continuation. I am really disappointed to see there no longer are plans for a second series as I was eagerly looking forward to watching more of this story. I think they really dropped the ball on this one. There was plenty of story line left to build on and lots of unanswered questions. I'm now a very unhappy view and I hope that they would reconsider their decision and pick up the story where it left off.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.449625
12.387467
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24075327345003927, 0.28826901783082626, 0.30613873610606845, 0.3312953823856466, 0.3321521938506983, 0.33393275542290235, 0.3345111066788905, 0.3375006435650765, 0.34101884606741506, 0.35209755921371555, 0.3603000569742504, 0.3634172519515947, 0.36809946641500346, 0.36873208373535726 ], "ids": [ 49722, 14905, 15673, 20122, 15694, 23353, 19094, 2414, 17331, 20399, 20135, 49746, 20401, 19779, 36410 ] }
49,722
I am continuously amazed at the US networks. What is the matter with them? Yet another very very promising series axed after just 15 episodes and we are left not knowing what the hell happens to everyone. I really thoroughly enjoyed this show and am so annoyed that we will never find out what happens to the characters and the 'monsters' from the deep. This show had everything. Humour, suspense, action. What more could you want. Why oh why did the pull the plug on this? It just doesn't make sense. Buffy went on for 7 series as did Charmed and enjoyable as they were, Surface, Invasion and Dead Like Me were even better. Just because a show does not get terribly high ratings doesn't mean it's rubbish and if they gave it a bit longer probably more people would catch on to it and they would end up with a big hit on their hands. One season just does not give it enough time to catch on and the networks are far to eager to pull the plug. They should learn that like fine wines and cheeses, they take time to mature.<br /><br />Bring Surface and Invasion back - P L E A S E !!!!!!!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.520243
12.50827
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.29609143777283886, 0.3283931995889523, 0.34628675355904126, 0.34868406281538467, 0.36066816082401576, 0.36758701645382696, 0.3686000494141395, 0.3688949367115536, 0.3714958907001028, 0.37287053268028925, 0.3895449838379502, 0.3920288839083368, 0.3948323732350497, 0.3953158009694151 ], "ids": [ 49723, 36310, 43072, 43838, 49735, 33896, 15674, 15686, 15677, 43839, 43060, 20115, 8507, 20398, 14905 ] }
49,723
I like the show, but come-on writers, get some action in it! Quit dragging it on and on. You have a great concept and it could be a whole lot more. Miles (Jenkins) is great and performs as a kid that age should act in the situation he finds himself in. Hey, get creative with the creatures, they may have telepathic capabilities or other out-worldly powers. The kid actors in the series are very good and convincing. The parents of Miles do appear to be a little too out-of-sense as to what is going on, but develop this, come on! you have a great seed here and there can be a whole new twist to next season with a lot of new characters and creatures and all kinds of neat sci-fi stuff. If they could make a series on a witch, then you should be able to make one on these creatures and kids.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
5.422027
12.545357
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3984716083547707, 0.4076894149236209, 0.41116281116340214, 0.42100130031742367, 0.42849625629787236, 0.43702993335562823, 0.44043536073746115, 0.45224568218824124, 0.45464988961754327, 0.45669156000522737, 0.4585945258977029, 0.46022022851730915, 0.46319518999697085, 0.46982311690480527 ], "ids": [ 49724, 19226, 4819, 19230, 19228, 19232, 19243, 47247, 10253, 17680, 30255, 19237, 42750, 24452, 14841 ] }
49,724
This DVD set is the complete widescreen 15-episode run of "Surface", a television show made by Universal in 2006. The full running time is 10 hours and 34 minutes plus a few bonus features (deleted scenes, cast interviews, special effects featurette). This was a relatively high budget show and much of the budget makes it to the screen in the form of quality production design and special effects. <br /><br />Unfortunately 10+ hours is a lot of time and as typically happens with this type of stuff, the overall quality begins to fall off in the later episodes. I found the first 7 episodes (Discs 1 and 2) extremely engaging and the remainder a disappointment. "Surface" was produced, written and directed by Josh and Jonas Pate; and it appears that they were surprised by the success of the series and unable to cobble together enough good subsequent material as they rushed to fill the order for additional episodes. It even looks like additional writers were brought in for the later episodes because the characters (who were already the weakest part of the series) lack consistency with the way they were played in the early episodes. The series was canceled and although the last episode provides a conclusion of sorts there are still a lot of things left hanging. <br /><br />It is basically a science fiction story about genetically created dragons; sort of a television blend of "Jurassic Park" and "ET". The story begins as a puzzle as a crew-less Navy sub is found adrift at sea, boaters on a Texas lake are sucked into whirlpool, a lighthouse in Africa is destroyed by a huge monster, etc. etc. And as long as things stay this vague there is a fair amount of tension and suspense. A human element is introduced in the form of three American families, one on each coast and one on the Gulf of Mexico. Laura Daughterty (Lake Bell) is a California marine biologist who discovers a strange creature rising from an undersea thermal vent on the ocean floor. Rich Connelly (Jay R. Ferguson) is diving with his younger brother in the gulf when a similar creature drags his brother away (never to be seen again). <br /><br />Miles Bennett (Carter Jenkins) is a Wilmington teenager who finds some strange eggs floating in the ocean. He takes one home where it hatches into an "ET" type dragon. He will spend the rest of the series trying to hide his strange pet from his family and from the local authorities. These dragons may look like lizards but they are more like indestructible electric eels, firing electromagnetic pulses, causing lightning strikes, emptying the sea of fish, and reproducing like a bunch of randy rabbits when they find an undersea thermal vent of boiling water. As long as it's uncertain whether or not they're intelligent, extraterrestrial, or harmless the premise is interesting. Once you begin to suspect their origin it all gets very tired and predictable. <br /><br />Jay R. Ferguson (a staggeringly bad actor in the tradition of David Hasselhoff) essentially plays the Richard Dreyfuss character from "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", so you know that with a better actor and a better director it could have been an interesting character. You will grow to hate this character more with each episode. Unfortunately what starts out as three parallel story lines is soon condensed into two as Ferguson and Bell (a low-budget version of Sandra Bullock) are soon paired up and involved in a series of moronic adventures almost as improbable as the stuff "Jason Bourne" gets himself into. You expect plot holes and the need to suspend disbelief in this type of show (that can even be part of the fun) but their adventures are not just totally implausible, they are utterly and completely boring. There are three consecutive episodes that feature Ferguson and Bell together in a submersible that will have you longing for the excitement of an all-day actuarial conference. <br /><br />Jenkins (Miles) is the strongest member of the cast and the segments with his pet dragon (Nimrod) are inter-cut often enough with the boring Ferguson-Bell stuff to keep you watching. And these segments benefit from the presence of gorgeous Leighton Meester (of recent "Gossip Girl" fame) as his sister Savannah. Apparently the producers picked up on the importance of this to their "teenage boy" target audience and the one positive thing they did with the later episodes of the series was to introduce Linsey Godrey (Caitlin) as a "first love" interest for Miles. So as Savannah's screen time decreases Catlin is gradually phased in. <br /><br />In retrospect they needed a third storyline to keep viewers sufficiently engaged and it would have been better to limit the adult melodrama in favor of a second group of young actors. <br /><br />Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.784569
12.74932
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2594817902882326, 0.2739150708817155, 0.2835777119840973, 0.2999127919393654, 0.30144298781875667, 0.30501914320108015, 0.3261080770019452, 0.33386150639892687, 0.3567596097371055, 0.36088477061431623, 0.4060403103780562, 0.40937327751966, 0.43508363692245056, 0.43864631791676745 ], "ids": [ 49725, 49749, 49741, 49740, 49720, 49726, 49730, 49747, 49734, 49731, 49729, 49736, 49737, 49742, 49744 ] }
49,725
I have bought the complete season of Surface. watched it in 3 days! I was so captured by the the plot, theories and basically everything about this show. The actor who plays Miles is great. Mile's sister, mother and father acted like real life family would. You could connect on so many levels it's fascinating.<br /><br />I find animals are so wonderful, you can almost connect with them as a parent is to a child. It would be something if a creature of this sort of nature truly exists.<br /><br />Am sadden, that Surface is not having a second season or at least four more shows. I have so many questions that need to be answered and hopefully maybe they will create more or maybe in a book.<br /><br />Love the show very much. For those who haven't watched Surface, if you like sci-fi you need to watch this!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.783436
12.784557
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2763430639610537, 0.2796851546375926, 0.2868208343525013, 0.30144298781875667, 0.32168601120299223, 0.3361231352789046, 0.336601799510007, 0.3488385558648861, 0.3743743666457956, 0.3853203969325253, 0.39429853724483266, 0.3979399130593636, 0.40029806278293134, 0.40161037717365866 ], "ids": [ 49726, 49747, 49734, 49728, 49725, 49720, 49740, 49749, 49742, 49741, 49737, 49729, 49731, 49730, 49744 ] }
49,726
The problem with TV today is that people have been spoiled by "lite" TV viewing. This type of television show is the equivalent of elevator music or "easy listening" jazz. The typical viewers idea of "continuity" is remembering who got voted off the island last week and wondering who will be the next to go. Show them a program like surface, Firefly, Dr. Who, or anything with a plot arc of more than three episodes and...well, they'll just flip back to Survivor.<br /><br />95% of the sheep watching TV don't want to rack their brains. They want excuses to not think. They want to make sure the "boob tube" lives up to its name...and they don't want shows that try and go any other route. Because of this, Surface and many other high-quality shows that should have lasted far longer have gotten the axe.<br /><br />TV viewers don't want stories, or morals, or philosophy, or anything over a third grade vocabulary level. They want people eating earthworms, or over-dramatized "real life" series (no such thing! You cannot observe something without changing the very nature of what you observe) or hormonal shows involving groups of people having trysts and then bragging about it to their friends.<br /><br />Today's television is nothing but a wasteland, and the few diamonds you can pick out of the dust are just tossed out because no one even knows what a diamond is anymore. Surface was one of those diamonds.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.316679
12.243842
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3559165928640009, 0.36008763770947294, 0.3638115025678005, 0.3684359983487884, 0.38052082537777343, 0.3837332237645833, 0.38600315263975793, 0.403561884776669, 0.4076158499635547, 0.4098949244665844, 0.4103209829357499, 0.41445012384293345, 0.41468333540957714, 0.4171862469126528 ], "ids": [ 49727, 20109, 20115, 5003, 49735, 20400, 15689, 46598, 15686, 20119, 49723, 35395, 40804, 29815, 14900 ] }
49,727
What can I say? I got up this morning and turned on sci-fi and watched half of the first season and figured it all out. Strange, unusual, and brilliant. It gives all potential, and to think at first I said this looks stupid. This has got to be the next best thing since X-Files, but as always nothing will ever take down that show in my opinion. I am telling you, it's scary and then suspenseful and then mellow. Towards the end you have Miles as a love puppy with a weird pet that is a new species. You have two people on the run from authorities. And a killer tsunami about to strike! Wow! And did I mention Miles pet is a potential killer(well the rest of his species is). Surface is a brilliant show with spins and twists that delivers it all.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.721762
12.928824
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2868208343525013, 0.33150763757115265, 0.36589149578276925, 0.3819902286699284, 0.38955106202571943, 0.40216721119629206, 0.4022891640820515, 0.40955491964269775, 0.41050898247038814, 0.41100273756556716, 0.4143392903937312, 0.41455334145822864, 0.41494089208617513, 0.4207752486043439 ], "ids": [ 49728, 49726, 49747, 49743, 14657, 49737, 49739, 41229, 13402, 49730, 39062, 49720, 20109, 49740, 49734 ] }
49,728
***SPOILERS*** Whatever else can (or can't) be said about it, SURFACE is superbly crafted. The cinematography is simply stunning (to say the least) and the fx are nothing if not state-of-the-art. Conceptually, the show offers a little bit of everything- and for just about everybody (parents, kids, fantasy and/or fx fans). CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND by way of CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON with a bit of JAWS and GODZILLA thrown in for good measure, say. And there wasn't a single sour note struck acting-wise, either; some surprisingly solid casting, here. This series SURFACEd, seemingly, from out of nowhere and, by sheer dint of its straightforward storytelling, carried the viewer along for the better part of an entire season. All things considered, a job very well done. I only hope it reSURFACEs next season...
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.785878
12.771929
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3521612102820897, 0.36088477061431623, 0.3773001716757134, 0.39429853724483266, 0.40488928396862345, 0.4062032291198544, 0.4113829112454198, 0.4205663690421214, 0.4237973277891385, 0.42404751890350656, 0.4255041151153721, 0.4269494751411814, 0.4340438210132661, 0.4429195549860355 ], "ids": [ 49729, 49720, 49725, 49740, 49726, 49730, 49744, 49747, 49734, 5728, 49728, 27633, 12205, 49737, 49742 ] }
49,729
It's not often that a TV series grabs me right off the bat; a recent chance download of the pilot for Surface had me glued to my seat for the entirety of the episode, after which I immediately set out on a fevered search to learn everything I could about this wonderful series. To my chagrin, I found out it had been canceled after a mere 15 episodes, despite its strong ratings and extremely favorable reviews. Such a shame.<br /><br />Since then, I've acquired the remaining episodes, and found the first 5 or 6 to be among the best television I've EVER watched. Just fantastic from start to finish, and as another reviewer commented, I LOVED how they ended every episode with a huge finish. I imagine watching it each week I would've been screaming with tension and just captivated, desperately waiting for the next episode to be released. Growing up, I always heard that was how early serial movies used to do it, ending with a huge cliffhanger to get the crowds back into the theater for the next episode.<br /><br />Well, it seems for some reason or another the suits decided to kill this off, and apparently the people behind the show must've seen the writing on the wall, because after episode 6 things definitely take a turn for the worse. I wouldn't say the episodes actually become BORING but a lot of the plot elements become a bit more clichéd, and I've got to say, the final episode really left me feeling cheated. I just wish the show's creators were given a fair chance. The *ONLY* other show that left me feeling like that was the first season of Stargate SG-1, which just resonated tremendously, feeling very "true", soulful and made from the heart. Surface was a great series, and maybe one day, some well-heeled TV lover will see all the outpouring of emotion about the show's cancellation, and bring back this show. One can hope, at least. :)
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.663826
12.643765
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.26155982072371764, 0.2681019257568239, 0.2853339930656682, 0.29232065625830705, 0.30501914320108015, 0.31889088732143545, 0.3360828972800123, 0.3370020570915393, 0.3410754185790442, 0.34420455566992303, 0.3553432079148152, 0.3596312900372508, 0.3705814384238949, 0.38007126337925634 ], "ids": [ 49730, 49749, 49740, 49741, 49747, 49725, 49735, 49736, 49731, 49737, 20109, 49720, 49732, 49734, 18236 ] }
49,730
Surface is one of the best shows that I have ever seen. NBC is so stupid for canceling a great show like this and worse of all only leaving it half complete. NBC or someone else should give Surface at least one more season just so it can be completed. It's as if NBC gave you a book to read and half way through it they decide to take it away from you and then you can never find out the ending. I just want to see what happens to everyone and most importantly see what happens to Nim. I think I can say this safely about most Surface fans is that we want to save Nim! Nim has taken all of our hearts away and then NBC just cuts them in two. Come on NBC, just give Surface one more season!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.776208
12.713833
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24353687820684755, 0.27016864187724365, 0.2755216511586792, 0.31640202165072573, 0.33055760059937966, 0.3370020570915393, 0.3410037901004882, 0.3567596097371055, 0.3601072542903836, 0.3636226766139261, 0.3669125020721272, 0.37448400252600555, 0.3979399130593636, 0.4041188969338779 ], "ids": [ 49731, 49749, 49740, 49744, 49735, 49741, 49730, 49747, 49725, 49732, 49736, 49734, 49737, 49726, 49742 ] }
49,731
Someone asked why it was canceled I tell you why Because "reality" makes money. the show surface was canceled so that they could replace it with a "reality" show, this will haunt NBC, I and about half of my high school, about 1000 people total have vowed to boycott NBC, until they bring this show back. in my area (I don't know about other places) but they had a great thing going with the Sci-Fi channel where the Sci-Fi channel would show last weeks episode at 7:00 and then NBC would show the week's new episode at 8:00 this was great because it gave you a little refresher as to what happened in the last episode. I was so angry when I learned that the show was canceled and they were going to just leave them on top of the church like that!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.576597
12.44032
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.30808533830119467, 0.3317464683641992, 0.3487499864851059, 0.3532297633756737, 0.3596312900372508, 0.3601072542903836, 0.3662293083542275, 0.36865944480048296, 0.37056274105691966, 0.379652105713535, 0.38105381412418526, 0.39504215679071153, 0.3989650663688544, 0.4022084082708932 ], "ids": [ 49732, 49735, 46595, 49749, 19094, 49730, 49731, 15673, 15691, 49747, 49741, 15689, 49737, 39214, 880 ] }
49,732
i don't believe it sixty percent of voters voted this show as ten now how the hell is the rating a five point eight it impossible i don't get it, its totally pathetic i mean how. anyway the show is great the story is great and the characters are interesting, definitely a ten out of ten from me i think the creatures are cool they look great and i wish i had a nimrod great show great cgi hope there's a second series as a lot went unanswered in the first season and when is nimrod gonna get any bigger as the rest of the creatures are huge, again why is the rating so low when the votes were so high <br /><br />10/10
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
3.930965
12.490515
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4725043037204003, 0.47773256043719814, 0.48085510067144455, 0.4932477495685418, 0.49361230888977536, 0.4953120879958959, 0.4992029401346816, 0.5032594367345453, 0.5066221048263038, 0.5070018719473618, 0.5097267370857448, 0.5141509219513352, 0.5150437796552461, 0.518459668838025 ], "ids": [ 49733, 2414, 35271, 4718, 12797, 20400, 26130, 21525, 37326, 15627, 37971, 18299, 36065, 17228, 31320 ] }
49,733
I enjoy the show Surface very much. The show is very entertaining and it's a clean show. A Show like surface is interesting. It keeps my attention. It has compassion and suspense. I love all the cast members that are on the show. They are all very good choices. i think it is very important to have the right cast of Any show because thats what makes any show a success and of course the scenes and the show itself. Television has changed so much over the years. It has changed in good ways and in bad. I love to watch some comedy,action, suspense and romance. And scifi. But Surface is a show that I hope comes back for many seasons because it is a great show and its something that families can watch. My children are grown, but my husband and I enjoy watching these types of shows. I appreciate your time and letting me comment my opinion. <br /><br />Thanks.<br /><br />Paulette Blackwell
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.788628
12.765417
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2537654810139891, 0.2754670836658867, 0.2796851546375926, 0.31035823924130324, 0.3154315635928495, 0.32900289146297723, 0.33386150639892687, 0.3567098853492945, 0.3669125020721272, 0.3705814384238949, 0.37110946809509093, 0.41679020831269664, 0.4172107345669632, 0.4205663690421214 ], "ids": [ 49734, 49720, 49749, 49726, 49740, 49741, 49735, 49725, 49747, 49731, 49730, 49744, 49736, 15677, 49729 ] }
49,734
When i started watching "Surface"for the first time i was hooked.It had everything i wanted in a show suspense,action,mystery,great plot,and a great cast of characters.My whole family loved to watch the show.It seems when there's a great show on TV the network usually cancels it like they seemed to do with this show.They go by the Nielson rating system which i think is stupid because there is a lot of junk that they seem to watch which the networks keep on the air.If only there was a way for everyone to vote on a show then maybe the good shows won't get canceled.When i watch TV now i only watch good shows so right now thats not watching a whole lot of TV.I hope that the network brings the show back but when they make up there mind with a dumb decision they seem to stick to it.I hope there's a lot of people out there that feel the same way.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.51285
12.371469
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.29867317191779263, 0.30808533830119467, 0.31640202165072573, 0.31889088732143545, 0.3240193638561607, 0.32900289146297723, 0.3362560925883271, 0.3373980764039556, 0.34223530827207294, 0.3464348487985257, 0.34868406281538467, 0.3660021991224871, 0.3684359983487884, 0.3704146767864829 ], "ids": [ 49735, 15677, 49732, 49731, 49730, 20400, 49734, 49749, 15689, 15673, 15686, 49723, 43797, 49727, 15676 ] }
49,735
I would like if they brought back surface. I really enjoyed the show along with my family. I felt the plot development and storyline were first rate. Like the other person said, it seems that everything gets reduced to the lowest common denominator. Nothing but bland, politically correct junk survives. Just look at the internet to see how many people were watching the show. Also it is not nice to leave us hanging as to what happened the all of the characters on the show. This is the same thing that happened to the time travel show I think was called 8 days but should have been called backstep. Did the Olympics kill surface? I know the writers strike killed another one of my favorite shows years ago called greatest American hero.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.793467
12.761292
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3172509782256675, 0.3304224229272765, 0.3360828972800123, 0.33984271064595684, 0.3636226766139261, 0.3782867805214326, 0.4060403103780562, 0.41679020831269664, 0.417245887119542, 0.4195799783230918, 0.42456219652822735, 0.43688107939715404, 0.437542444381235, 0.44009329038348954 ], "ids": [ 49736, 49749, 49740, 49730, 49741, 49731, 49747, 49725, 49734, 49735, 49732, 41552, 49744, 15673, 49737 ] }
49,736
I am new at this, so bear with me please. I am a big fan of Surface. I thought the script and the computer graphics were exceptional, as good as any Sci Fi flick I've seen at the theater. In February the TV guide said Season Finale, the announcer for the show said something to the effect of, "...and now for the season finale of Surface." Season Finale, not series finale! I couldn't wait for fall to get here, to see was going to happen next. So fall gets here and it's nowhere to be found! If NBC isn't going to pick it up, what about Sci Fi or USA? It seems to me that Bay Watch didn't last long on ABC & then USA picked it up, and it went gang busters! (I bet ABC was chocking) Ha! If not a series, then at least a mini series, to give all us loyal fans closure. What happened to our guy's trapped in the church steeple? Was the creature in the chaple Nim? Did he have a grouth spert? Does the cloned guy come over to our side? There are so many unanswered questions. Thank's for listening to me babble!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.768708
12.801337
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24661650946989966, 0.295945140939753, 0.3171035210042531, 0.3410754185790442, 0.37448400252600555, 0.3853203969325253, 0.38955106202571943, 0.3922326086051702, 0.39504215679071153, 0.40937327751966, 0.41810062068822007, 0.4340438210132661, 0.4357026552277028, 0.437491528020555 ], "ids": [ 49737, 49747, 49742, 49740, 49730, 49731, 49726, 49728, 49749, 49732, 49725, 49741, 49729, 49744, 49720 ] }
49,737
This show has an amazing plot with good and recognizable actors (like the girl from Boston Legal and Boris the Butcher from Snatch). Even the extras and the kid, whom i thought from the commercial might be a weak link, surprised me with his skill. It's just the little things that the director needs to tweak. Like the guy who does the recap of the last episode at the beginning of each new episode needs to be fired. Having a narrator tell you what happened kind of ruins the story. The only other small problem I had was that sometimes they take too long to do things, but no where near as long as some shows like Prison Break. Anyone know when they will resume the season??
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.384052
12.345234
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4148360746618006, 0.4160053339953348, 0.4276167817121087, 0.437790104965637, 0.43810163989368955, 0.44076795725648965, 0.4464498794039554, 0.4499318563383109, 0.4554649931342635, 0.45766303549716725, 0.46552208012086493, 0.4694882720298795, 0.474464475465035, 0.47474746368286724 ], "ids": [ 49738, 14905, 10122, 15679, 13267, 49730, 15673, 35302, 15683, 33272, 15694, 49722, 20304, 35301, 46602 ] }
49,738
All I can say after watching the DVDs of the first season is that I can not believe NBC "green-lighted" this show. It's so different than what's currently in vogue save for Lost. Those who miss the X-Files just may have a worthy successor. Not as mysterious or intense as Lost, I find it to be overall more entertaining.<br /><br />This kind of extended story is hard to make. I mean it could degenerate into childish dribble if most of the elements do not cohere together. But cohere they do and I think the cast is excellent, the writing sharp, the location and props first rate, and the special effects very good for a television budget. Sure it pushes what is plausible, but as it does it never gets so silly as to insult your intelligence.<br /><br />Bottomline is that this is great Sci-Fi drama for the entire family. I doubt it will be a classic with a long run like X-Files, but in the meantime I recommend getting the DVD if you missed it like I did the first time around. This fall my must see shows has just increased by one more series!<br /><br />PS: I just heard it got axed from NBC...Here's hoping Sci-Fi picks it up.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.187648
12.547371
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.31668537848171074, 0.3261926269533483, 0.3267334732472038, 0.3284835109612332, 0.3295374655454323, 0.3338313147686217, 0.34018630415919415, 0.3457492079829865, 0.3510861464855868, 0.36128832145663325, 0.36253737335373915, 0.3634568589463454, 0.371054486761645, 0.37106576404322433 ], "ids": [ 49739, 20112, 20133, 6822, 20134, 6787, 18228, 15677, 18299, 23912, 41429, 20113, 20135, 38542, 7725 ] }
49,739
Surface, from the day its teaser first showed in the summer of 2005, was a tossup. On one hand, it seemed so high-concept and plot driven that to the passerby it felt like it would work out better as a motion picture (or several). Plus, it felt like it was NBC's attempt at a "Lost-killer". On the other hand, one may have realized that the story was too expansive to tell in a movie or two, and fans of Lost seemed intrigued.<br /><br />So, after one (and possibly only) season on NBC, the show is on an indefinite hiatus that could either put it in the vault, on Sci-fi, or filling a gap in NBC's lineup in the summer or fall of 2007 or beyond. Its ratings were some of the better on the network (which isn't saying much), but the show has been taken off the air with no real official announcement of its future.<br /><br />So, is it worthwhile? Yes.<br /><br />Surface follows a continuing story format, driven by plot with next to no filler episodes. Almost everything that happens on the show is important to the plot, much like a motion picture. No filler episodes, which put a pain in your side when you missed an episode. Yet, the show's double-edge helped made up for that; Big things seem to happen every episode, but since it feels like a movie you end every episode feeling like little happened and you're left wanting more! That trait of the show, though shows how great it is. The cast is solid; the three main leads, including the beautiful Lake Bell as Laura Daughtery, put in a solid performance every episode, each driven by their own reasons for finding/studying the creatures. The supporting cast, including Ian Anthony Dale and the brief performance by Rade Serbedzija fill out the cast well. The story is slow to start (my one regret; it doesn't really pick up until a 3-4 episodes in to the short 15-episode season), but the latter half of the season makes up for it. The visual effects are stunning (one's jaw will drop when you see an overhead view of one of the creatures 'attack' a ship), as well.<br /><br />Many of the show's problems can be remedied by purchasing the complete first season and not having to wait a week (or three) to watch the next episode.<br /><br />In short, if you've missed the first season and you're curious, go back and watch it. It's no Twin Peaks in terms of quirkiness, but the high-concept nature of it puts in in league with that, Lost, and other similar shows, with a flair for action and adventure. Enjoy it.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.800519
12.759707
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2681019257568239, 0.27016864187724365, 0.27603385533542135, 0.27884794594414575, 0.2835777119840973, 0.2849358827701025, 0.31035823924130324, 0.3171035210042531, 0.3266746679381679, 0.3304224229272765, 0.3361231352789046, 0.3766349354042009, 0.3773001716757134, 0.3801085792701028 ], "ids": [ 49740, 49730, 49731, 49720, 49749, 49725, 49747, 49734, 49737, 49741, 49736, 49726, 49744, 49729, 20119 ] }
49,740
Surface was awesome, I don't know how many Mondays I survived at school just by thinking about the new episode of surface. I loved it, sometimes I had to call home and tell my mom to tape it for me. I was pretty upset when I heard it was cancelled, I mean jeez way to let us hang. So,they can have their new Tina fay comedy(you couldn't pay me to watch that, I think seeing the commercials made me dumber). I'm gonna miss my Monday night fix of Surface, even if my sister did make fun of me. although,kidnapped does look good and, they still have L&O: SVU (i think, i still have to check) (i only wrote the 2 lines above, because they said i needed ten lines).
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.789669
12.741498
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.25735784235765213, 0.2739150708817155, 0.2853339930656682, 0.3085055151851924, 0.3154315635928495, 0.3266746679381679, 0.33055760059937966, 0.33984271064595684, 0.3623485643945479, 0.3743743666457956, 0.379652105713535, 0.4115148977643335, 0.41810062068822007, 0.4260077920145896 ], "ids": [ 49741, 49749, 49725, 49730, 49747, 49734, 49740, 49731, 49736, 49744, 49726, 49732, 49735, 49737, 49720 ] }
49,741
I am sorry to see that SURFACE has not been picked up for the NBC 2006-2007 season. I guess market demand for inane game and reality shows on broadcast television, a reflection on our sense of culture, has conquered a good story. I hope and pray that some network picks it up so it will continue on as does STARGATE and it's spin-offs.<br /><br />I also hope the producers find a venue where they can produce the level of Post Production they wished for in a TV Guide interview. Right now the reruns on Sci-Fi, marathons, will have to do. I for one would love to see where the story goes after the tsunami that ended Episode 15. I would like to find out the mastermind of the efficient effort to obfuscate the real identity of the creatures.<br /><br />FYC Morningbear
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.788941
12.727963
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24309859822877833, 0.295945140939753, 0.3488385558648861, 0.4041188969338779, 0.4048285266988928, 0.4068131638200224, 0.41099813836508525, 0.420848303965465, 0.43150496850094155, 0.43508363692245056, 0.43685011264335305, 0.4429195549860355, 0.44763810672016735, 0.45813442093814716 ], "ids": [ 49742, 49747, 49737, 49726, 49731, 49730, 49740, 49732, 49728, 49749, 49725, 49748, 49729, 49741, 49720 ] }
49,742
This is the first sci fi series that I have seriously become hooked on since Star Trek, (and I haven't watched Trek in years). It takes the invasion theme in somewhat different directions, but has done it in a very exciting way. It also borrows from soap opera format, where it continues the arc throughout the entire year run of the series. The CGI definitely doesn't overcome the plot or the characters, except for Nim, the fledgling creature who is a pet with definite attitude. (Anything that would show what he really thought about the neighbor's yippy dog is A-1 in my book.) He was a stroke of genius. <br /><br />I am left at the end of the finale asking questions (intelligent ones, I hope) and crossing my fingers and toes that NBC or someone else (Sci Fi, maybe) will continue to run the series and answer those questions. <br /><br />A really great, classy show.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.759973
13.132187
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.36589149578276925, 0.38596817034102804, 0.38623085669476886, 0.3896642666691348, 0.39278248993737885, 0.39346462518722747, 0.4036138272528422, 0.4049739305592229, 0.40613328258706194, 0.408760650167837, 0.4111632733892484, 0.4141703264106952, 0.418595799784785, 0.4193763050123491 ], "ids": [ 49743, 49728, 12902, 23665, 20819, 12896, 368, 12891, 12895, 12894, 12898, 43057, 31619, 43070, 39558 ] }
49,743
A new and innovative show with a great cast that keeps you on the edge of your seat. Lake Bell is wonderful..it is to bad that her other show "Miss Match" was canceled. I am just glad she came back on "Surface". I can't wait for the return of "Surface". This show is really something unique to watch. With an eerie underwater world that is akin to Jurassic Park, this show keeps you wondering what is next. Nim is adorable even if he is going to turn into something larger and much more ominous. There are so many generic shows out there that just seem to rehash the same old subjects. When something like "Surface" comes along you just have to say "THANK YOU!".
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.785416
12.741654
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2755216511586792, 0.3618442906620256, 0.3623485643945479, 0.37110946809509093, 0.3766349354042009, 0.3789211821868993, 0.40161037717365866, 0.4062032291198544, 0.42225857169591463, 0.4357026552277028, 0.43688107939715404, 0.43864631791676745, 0.439792626904144, 0.44728456919262416 ], "ids": [ 49744, 49731, 49747, 49741, 49734, 49740, 49749, 49726, 49729, 49730, 49737, 49736, 49725, 49728, 49735 ] }
49,744
I thought this was a very good TV series and I would like to see it continue. It really got interesting there at the end and I really want to see where it is going from there. Some times we are to quick to kill a series without giving it a chance. I think this one needs a chance to go on, and I will definitely be waiting for it. The ocean is one of the places that man knows so little about and I think that is a mystery in itself. What is waiting for us beneath the waters of the world. It is even said that man maybe crawled out or slivered out of the waters many millennium ago. Is this a new evolution coming about? Are we going to move down the food chain or fight for our position?
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
1.048655
15.098296
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.38076568263831045, 0.4245547076402467, 0.4595895926951189, 0.4627862941945754, 0.46316726719547674, 0.46918815192258767, 0.4695307035449262, 0.47268528843542734, 0.4729023619960646, 0.4754342320520881, 0.4782439525080189, 0.48878345179455585, 0.4893183096415227, 0.4900157570959385 ], "ids": [ 49745, 49748, 40959, 41207, 49742, 49747, 41208, 40960, 16697, 41204, 18229, 49728, 41203, 27090, 27095 ] }
49,745
i have now seen the whole of season one and can say i have not enjoyed a show of this standard in a long time it great to see a show like this in the pipeline and hope that there are many on the way the season final was the best bar none cant wait for season 2 as far as i am conserned things can only get better like how will milles continu to change will rick get his family back and how will they get off the church roof with acting of this level it is easy to see why the show is such a big hit with people as long as people as making shows like this i will keep watching i think its hard now to come up with an original idea as so many shows have coverd a large range of subjects so to see one as original as this is refreshing
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.363612
12.361738
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.32858091154898894, 0.3602651167898624, 0.3603000569742504, 0.368631925893679, 0.3711451150489643, 0.3748498849348536, 0.3783746716361087, 0.3789665469536403, 0.38930405223753406, 0.3924706027384569, 0.3962973364951704, 0.3985266033610534, 0.4016556667911181, 0.40588637981562203 ], "ids": [ 49746, 6824, 36410, 49722, 19779, 15677, 20122, 47152, 20115, 14880, 39235, 38542, 14905, 23276, 2414 ] }
49,746
Surface was one of the few truly unique shows on TV last season. I can honestly say I modified my schedule so I could be home to watch every episode. Tons of action, suspense, science fiction, etc.<br /><br />Story was of a boy who found an egg that hatched into a sea creature. The same sea creature that had killed the main character's brother and the woman character (oceanographer) had seen. Most people think it is a deadly killing machine but the one raised from the egg was very friendly.<br /><br />Only problem is NBC canceled it so now we'll never know what happens... Hopefully Sci-Fi or some other channel will pick it up.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.751616
12.762482
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24309859822877833, 0.24661650946989966, 0.2763430639610537, 0.2849358827701025, 0.29232065625830705, 0.3085055151851924, 0.3088028825706356, 0.3261080770019452, 0.33150763757115265, 0.3410037901004882, 0.3567098853492945, 0.3618442906620256, 0.37056274105691966, 0.3782867805214326 ], "ids": [ 49747, 49742, 49737, 49726, 49740, 49730, 49741, 49749, 49725, 49728, 49731, 49734, 49744, 49732, 49736 ] }
49,747
Once again, there's dastardly government agencies stopping at nothing to prevent public knowledge of some momentous events. In this case, the discovery of a new underwater species that could threaten the planet's ecology. Although the creature is no E.T. he does seem to befriend one youngster, who protects it at all costs, not realising it is but an infant of the species and is going to get a lot bigger – and badder This 2005 series had a lot going for it. It is family drama, sci-fi, thriller with more than a few comedic moments. The characters are believable, well acted and well photographed. The show holds the attention. Of course, as with any sci-fi show, suspension of disbelief has to be achieved. And I think it is here. Alas, the series crashed after season one, so we never get a resolution. Infuriating.. There is a general comment I feel worth making here. Many TV networks and/or film distribution companies cancel, quite arbitrarily, seemingly excellent TV series – particularly intelligent sci-fi ones. Now there may be some very good reasons for this, although the audiences are treated with utmost disdain and rarely told the reasons. This in itself is annoying. What really gets my goat is that, having cancelled the series, they then issue the thing as far as it's got, on DVD, in an obvious attempt to milk the cash cow as far as possible. For previous viewers of the series that's OK, they know what they're in for but … many of these unfinished series end on a cliffhanger. Two that come to mind immediately are "Surface", and "Odyssey 5". If you've heard good things about the series and not seen it you go and buy the blasted DVD and end up with an unresolved plot issue – it makes me very angry!! I enjoyed "Surface" immensely and didn't realise the poor characters would end up in a situation that looked totally untenable – and we'll never know what happened next. I believe that there should be a prominent notice on all such DVD issues, to the effect that the story is unfinished. Nowadays I check on TV series purchases (IMDB is an obvious excellent starting point) to find out whether a 'complete' series is really complete or not. Buyer beware.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.208632
12.707979
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.38076568263831045, 0.39967510448362265, 0.40290570945423476, 0.40509988245570705, 0.4159171408934431, 0.4169986667359691, 0.418475804540154, 0.4194083285722968, 0.42021737438000484, 0.4204179510626741, 0.42188764361594, 0.42247192353601626, 0.4236319259029542, 0.4258942126685764 ], "ids": [ 49748, 49745, 30929, 43069, 6738, 41202, 41203, 43055, 28227, 49727, 49735, 35418, 8204, 49747, 35415 ] }
49,748
Surface is one of the greatest t.v. series I have seen. The acting is great and the storyline enthralling. Each episode left me barely able to wait to watch the next. I especially thought Carter Jenkins who played Miles Bennett did a superb job...he is a very talented actor and I look forward to seeing more of his work. <br /><br />I can't believe Surface only made one season...once again the public has let me down. It is hard to fathom that a great shows like this one would get canceled, while crap reality shows continue on year after year. Whoever made the decision to cancel this show really dropped the ball on this one.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
4.786233
12.730311
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.24353687820684755, 0.25735784235765213, 0.2594817902882326, 0.26155982072371764, 0.2754670836658867, 0.27884794594414575, 0.3088028825706356, 0.3172509782256675, 0.3362560925883271, 0.336601799510007, 0.3487499864851059, 0.3789211821868993, 0.3922326086051702, 0.3995665350095473 ], "ids": [ 49749, 49731, 49741, 49725, 49730, 49734, 49740, 49747, 49736, 49735, 49726, 49732, 49744, 49737, 49720 ] }
49,749
If vampire tales are your cup of blood, then this Goth-fest based on the Anne Rice Vampire Chronicles should prove to be a satisfying experience. A veritable consortium of the undead in a contemporary setting, `Queen of the Damned,' directed by Michael Rymer, is a story of shadows and darkness, and of the unfortunate souls who dwell therein for eternity.<br /><br /> The vampire Lestat (Stuart Townsend), bored with a world that no longer excites him, has been `asleep' for many years; but suddenly, the sounds of that world he hears from his extended slumber change, and liking what he hears, he ventures forth to investigate. What he finds is a world filled with new sounds, a new kind of music-- driving and penetrating-- sounds that assault the senses and make him feel alive and welcome. And he knows that at long last his time has come, that it is time for him and those like him to come out into the open and face the world on their terms. Toward that end he becomes the front man for a band-- a singer and performer unlike any the world has ever known. He presents himself as a vampire, and very quickly amasses a following that extends far beyond London (where it all begins), and will ultimately take him to Death Valley, California, where he plans to give a concert that promises to be beyond anything anyone has ever seen or experienced.<br /><br /> Lestat is powerful, without question, but there are those of his kind who do not take favorably to the fact that he has revealed them, one of whom is Marius (Vincent Perez), a vampire powerful in his own right-- the vampire, in fact, who `made' Lestat so many years before-- and they are gathering, coming together and making their plans to meet Lestat at the concert. And they are not going for the music. But there is something else, as well: At one point Lestat has inadvertently awakened the `Mother' of them all, the most powerful of all the vampires, Akasha (Aaliyah), who is about to make her presence known to all, and especially to the one she has chosen to rule by her side as her King: Lestat. And at the concert, rest assured, Akasha will be in attendance, without fail.<br /><br /> Make no mistake, this is Lestat's story, and Rymer presents it amid a setting rich with atmosphere and with some exquisite moments, though his film has less bite to it than say, `Interview With the Vampire,' or `Bram Stoker's Dracula.' He sets a good pace, and there are some scenes that provide some real thrills, but overall the film isn't as soaked in menace as it could be, or as much as one might expect. In the final tally, in fact, the amount of flesh that is incinerated wins out over actual blood-letting, though there is more than a taste of gore, and more than a fair share of lips and mouths dripping with the red stuff. There's some good F/X on hand, too, especially in the sequences that accentuate the speed of the vampires, as they move and hurtle through the air faster than the naked eye can discern. It's a decent job by Rymer, but he could have put more teeth into it had he played up the alienation hinted at by Lestat; as it is, you get a sense of his detachment, but not enough to get you totally involved.<br /><br /> In `Interview With the Vampire,' Tom Cruise brought some charismatic star power to the role of Lestat, but Townsend is even more effective, with a look and an attitude that captures Lestat perfectly. He plays him with a sense of acceptance, and under closer scrutiny you may even find a hint of remorse and longing. It's a good performance, and one that sells his character convincingly.<br /><br /> As Marius, Vincent Perez does a nice job, too-- he is, in fact, one of the strengths of the film-- though his character is a bit ambiguous; that, however, has more to do with the way he was written than with Perez's performance, which is quite good. <br /><br /> Turning in noteworthy performances, as well, are Marguerite Moreau, as Jesse, a young woman too curious for her own good; and the gorgeous Lena Olin as Maharet, Jesse's Aunt, who ultimately plays a pivotal role in the outcome of the drama involving Lestat and Akasha.<br /><br /> And as Akasha, Aaliyah is an absolutely riveting presence. What more can one say about her other than she is a gifted performer, with tremendous talent and beauty. And, tragically, she has left us much too soon.<br /><br /> The supporting cast includes Paul McGann (David), Christian Manon (Mael), Claudia Black (Pandora), Bruce Spence (Khayman), Matthew Newton (Armand), Tiriel Mora (Roger) and Megan Dorman (Maudy). With a much stronger story than the usual offerings of this particular genre, Anne Rice fans, especially, will be pleased with `Queen of the Damned,' a film nicely crafted and delivered by director Rymer and his engaging cast. By focusing attention on the drama of the story-- and the way it's presented-- rather than concentrating on merely providing some cheap thrills, Rymer has succeeded in turning out a true horror film that is definitely a cut above, and one that just may whet your appetite for more of the same. And that's the magic of the movies. I rate this one 7/10. <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br />
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.983106
14.802623
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2637169708417152, 0.30446964659886355, 0.30995657884815453, 0.3790251724138406, 0.38238188202108914, 0.38703961578342094, 0.38777717332443395, 0.3953801272317571, 0.4094766581343928, 0.409965573674556, 0.41131423153436575, 0.41475846479455813, 0.419582400291187, 0.4217769757125265 ], "ids": [ 49750, 49758, 28210, 49756, 49751, 28206, 5648, 28203, 28207, 49766, 49763, 48871, 35218, 49762, 4935 ] }
49,750
Despite a few acceptable adaptations of the books' main themes, QUEEN OF THE DAMNED/THE VAMPIRE LESTAT did not stay true to Anne Rices's complicated story telling. The deep layers that build up all the characters were shredded apart to only their surface, if not a completely different identity. The chronological order of the major events in the movie seemed warped and uneven.<br /><br />However, there were quite a few things the movie did to deserve my rating of 7. One was that the film strongly captured the affect that Lestat (among other vampires)had to the public, especially young girls. The movie also did a fairly good job focusing on the importance of heredity and history that the vampires took pride in. The scenes of sensuality were also atmospherically satisfying.<br /><br />The acting in QUEEN OF THE DAMNED was moderate, if disappointing. Stuart Townsend and Aaliyah have a surprising chemistry, though it only shows when the acting is at its best (not very often). The characters are nothing compared to the ones established in INTERVIEW WITH A VAMPIRE. It also lacks the emotional intelligence of THE FEAST OF ALL SAINTS, which is a shame because Rice's Queen of the Damned book had that, and more.<br /><br />This movie doesn't give all that it appears to be. The effects are dull and very disappointing. The extravagance needed in many scenes is not given, and the dialog is tiring. The settings for many scenes are not how I pictured them in the book, and I think that many of them weren't even taken from the story. There are only a few areas of incoherence near the beginning and middle of the movie, but it wraps itself up fairly neatly, giving the viewer a full story (if they had not read the book).<br /><br />Somethings that I feel the movie needed include a good original score (Howard Shore or Elmer Bernstein), instead of the mix of rock music; though I had no problem with some of the songs. Another thing that would have made the movie better is better set direction. The scenery was boring as well as unclear, which is important in a story that moves around quite frequently.<br /><br />Overall, QUEEN OF THE DAMNED was an unevenly disappointing yet somewhat satisfying adaption of the important novel. With a few simple changes, it may have been a very successful piece of film work. I'd recommend this movie for people who has seen INTERVIEW or have read the books, so that they can make their own opinion on the adaption.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.00568
14.764013
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.19338158680144524, 0.19870839396825846, 0.23322221417767242, 0.24901711987062047, 0.251523159965491, 0.2560246294728715, 0.2608660978369195, 0.2754691491038612, 0.311813831066151, 0.32663808588561416, 0.3364136158175195, 0.3386627547358251, 0.3387957770934248, 0.36366797576681065 ], "ids": [ 49751, 28203, 28202, 28207, 49756, 49769, 28205, 28206, 49759, 28209, 49762, 49758, 49752, 28210, 699 ] }
49,751
Although this movie doesn't have the darkness of the books, it is in my opinion a great movie. It's great campy fun with the beautiful Stuart Townsend as Lestat. He may not have the blond hair and blue eyes that are so vividly described in the book, but to be fair, he would not look good with blond hair, and Lestat is most definitely about looking good. He moves like the predator I always imagined Lestat would have.<br /><br /> The visual effects are pretty good, and the soundtrack is absolutely amazing. It's not Interview with the Vampire, so don't try to compare the two. Interview is Louis' story. This is a cut and paste version of Lestat's. In any case, I highly recommend.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.964293
14.749794
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.21102654891121553, 0.23839006186009493, 0.2733997466280057, 0.29972227283959196, 0.3050425726053103, 0.32541766693631635, 0.3386627547358251, 0.33906668400784634, 0.3426717092441347, 0.3436337066252537, 0.3471552404114906, 0.3500048945529737, 0.35545700435760164, 0.36528254403084126 ], "ids": [ 49752, 49758, 49762, 28203, 49763, 28202, 28204, 49751, 49756, 46657, 46325, 49764, 19724, 28207, 699 ] }
49,752
I've seen this movie countes times now and still can't get sick of it. It's like a frickin' drug. I know a lot of people don't like it but there's something about it that just draws me in. Every single performance is spectacular, but Aaliyah is the one who steals the show. She not only played the role of Akasha she became it. Her body movement and beauty was captured exceptionally well. It's also nice to see that a black girl was chosen for the role of an Egyptian Queen (No, I'm not predjudice against white people, I am one). True it's not known what color the ancient Egyptians really were but this was a nice change. Stuart Townsend completely made me forget about Tom Cruise's portrayel of Lestat and Marguerite was striking once again. All in all it was a good time at the movies. For those who haven't seen it, be sure to watch it with an open mind and not take it too seriously. I mean, it's a movie about a vampire who becomes a rock star. Take it as that.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.043414
14.71429
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2811622466761897, 0.2921944846623338, 0.32570597856109196, 0.3324587257069883, 0.3545835091571924, 0.3632837377131851, 0.3709859092607699, 0.37257708825245495, 0.3993632586313669, 0.4013046073130534, 0.401886437318729, 0.4116650122500852, 0.41615567795412, 0.4198716448706302 ], "ids": [ 49753, 49761, 49755, 49767, 40356, 28209, 49770, 40355, 40353, 40334, 40340, 4560, 40172, 40342, 11996 ] }
49,753
It has very little to do with the books: half of the characters have been eliminated, the plot has been greatly altered, people's parents are changed for different characters . . .<br /><br />However, if you watch it as an independent piece (try and forget you ever read the books) the movie is very well put together, everyone is very good looking, and there is even a sweet ending...
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.035325
11.414499
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2912223706585658, 0.2973748981781078, 0.2984602590194927, 0.3018726208850907, 0.3105592238698659, 0.31994818164940964, 0.32712431175915746, 0.32941216664912887, 0.3359077636399147, 0.33809818443529505, 0.34147169830176194, 0.34323137458194564, 0.3432751406830804, 0.3445395422250994 ], "ids": [ 49754, 24668, 5890, 8159, 43087, 29292, 29606, 4532, 22924, 35386, 35352, 31449, 47320, 5381, 30136 ] }
49,754
Despite the pans of reviewers, I liked this movie. In fact, I liked it better than Interview With a Vampire and I liked this Lestat (Stuart Townsend) better than Cruise's attempt. All the major players from the series were present: Talbot, Lestat, Armand, Maharet, Khayman, Pandora, Mael, Marius and a half-dozen more (albeit most of them in cameo). Marius, Lestat and Akasha were the main players (and Jesse of the Talamasca). Also, despite other reviews, I think this movie and the music was faithful to Anne Rice's portrayal and ethos, at least as I perceive it. Aailiyah was pretty good as Akasha, in places compelling (her first entrance and mini dance scene). The movie didn't capture the breadth of the books series but I thought it was a nice supplement.<br /><br />I'm a big fan of this series mostly due to Anne Rice's style, sensitivities and treatments. And I found this movie a faithful and often superlative representation of the author's vision.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.010633
14.713334
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2364502491217847, 0.2921944846623338, 0.29244456908015026, 0.3136094557348228, 0.34562769579379893, 0.35408459629604694, 0.41283660527370314, 0.41840545347211044, 0.41840552555747823, 0.41888212679103587, 0.4258019855527341, 0.42608412349054514, 0.42988973803789743, 0.4361579536926319 ], "ids": [ 49755, 49761, 49753, 49767, 49770, 49764, 28209, 28206, 701, 699, 28202, 28208, 21138, 49769, 15744 ] }
49,755
The movie, although not faithful to the original novels, succeeds in creating modern gothic vampire vision. Somebody tried to insult QotD calling it a 1,5h music video clip. Actually it is a complement. The everpresent gothic music combined with the music-video-like shots made the movie so moody - and "Queen of the Damned" is a mood-driven story.<br /><br />I do not understand the die hard fans who complain on the modifications of the story. The plot has been modified to be less confusing for viewers who do not know the novels. The number of characters had been lessened and I have no problems with changing Lestat's maker or skipping Mekare's character. The biggest change - the romance of Lestat and Jesse - seemed a very nice addition to me.<br /><br />Actually, I think that a faithful adaptation would be a complete failure. The slow and gloomy mood, that was perfect to XIXth century New Orlean and Louis's angst, wouldn't fit Lestat's rebellion and his music. And while the book can be slow, descriptive and combining multiple elements yet conveying them well, the movie simply cannot do it without turning chaotic. "Vampire Lestat" and "Queen of the Damned" can be split into at least three movies - the creators had to choose something.<br /><br />Some of the special effects, like the flying or walking out of the flames were the only thing I actually didn't like in this movie. But Akasha's death was very nice. The cast was good, Stuard Townsend was convincing as Lestat, especially on the concert, but I preferred Banderas as Armand. I loved Jesse, Maharet and Marius though. And of course Aaliyah was perfect with her quasi-ancient-Egyptian accent.<br /><br />So if you are into gothic music and vampiric dillemas of loneliness and eternity (and you don't consider books to be movie scenarios) "Queen of the Damned" is one of the few movies which show vampires as something more than blood sucking monsters. But please do not compare it to the "Interview" movie. It has a completely different style, precisely as much different as different were Louis and Lestat. Personally I find it thrilling first to watch a vampire's existence from Louis' "bottled hunger" point of view, and then switching to one devoid of all morals but surprisingly outgoing for a vampire, Lestat.<br /><br />I'd give "Queen" 8 of 10 as it had some technical flaws, but I decided to give it 9 as it's vastly underrated by people who hate it simply because it didn't match their vision of the books, which can be clearly seen by looking at the votes breakdown.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.00815
14.780806
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.23773716666281186, 0.24901711987062047, 0.25054793526824604, 0.2512280020243026, 0.2549376300616526, 0.265701862419337, 0.30995657884815453, 0.3181342925279885, 0.33906668400784634, 0.3497581631056178, 0.3622407011512876, 0.363597435988822, 0.38327039943806573, 0.3896317625168535 ], "ids": [ 49756, 28210, 49751, 28207, 28203, 28202, 49758, 49750, 28206, 49752, 49762, 49763, 49759, 28205, 26878 ] }
49,756
I thought that this was actually the best vampire movie that I've ever seen. I've seen a lot too. The effects were great, and the casting was brilliant. It was an all around good movie. The makeup and costumes were great too. I would recommend it, but not for kids. It's not a children's movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.699282
14.657147
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.27258695406738165, 0.27399249171425644, 0.3035077732260062, 0.3111912810299923, 0.3113618370944037, 0.3128988316049325, 0.319800548196849, 0.32287393302836176, 0.32355680178681323, 0.3269140296352061, 0.32756979371837336, 0.33204752922120107, 0.33724897396291875, 0.34183570839752675 ], "ids": [ 49757, 49760, 11063, 46076, 25068, 37251, 46330, 573, 45092, 27386, 27166, 42269, 24516, 23998, 45091 ] }
49,757
After going to sleep out of sheer loneliness, Lestat wakes from a 100-year sleep to the sounds of a new music he wants to be a part of and the band "The Vampire Lestat" is born. His longing to end his loneliness and his "living in the light" attitude along with his music, anger his fellow vampires and awaken an evil that has been slumbering for thousands of years.<br /><br />This film is not for those looking for a true book-to-film adaptation. Those who have read the books and expect to see it on the screen are in for a huge disappointment. This film will appeal to those who really enjoyed the "Interview With the Vampire" film.<br /><br />There are a few plot holes and incongruencies, but as a whole, this film was satisfying. Stuart Townsend portrays Lestat with a sensuality and sexiness lacking in the previous film. The relationships portrayed in the film were very sexy and sizzling.<br /><br />As a film, the story compels you and draws you in. Casting is wonderful. Loved this story and film. If you like simmering sensuality and sexual tension you'll love this film!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.978733
14.764235
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.21102654891121553, 0.2637169708417152, 0.265701862419337, 0.27201067157399317, 0.27416165794730607, 0.3007606467018553, 0.303517499253813, 0.3096038038635973, 0.3257262591107942, 0.32795437155364837, 0.3326196592660179, 0.3364136158175195, 0.3416225164119904, 0.3494897571764156 ], "ids": [ 49758, 49752, 49750, 49756, 28203, 49762, 28202, 49763, 28210, 28204, 11811, 48871, 49751, 49764, 28206 ] }
49,758
"Queen of the Damned" is one of the best vampire movies I had ever seen! The movie had suspense, action, and gore. The combination of the fierce demanding attitude of the Queen and the rock mood of our star, very well acted by Stuart Townsend, makes a wonderfully done movie that only this combination can create. I'm always the one to give advice to my friends and family members on which movies are worthy of renting and when they ask me if "Queen of the Damned" is worthy, I tell them it's worthy of buying. This movie is most for sure a must-have in all horror movie lovers' homes!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.816478
14.671728
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2754691491038612, 0.3122187579812936, 0.3165006098342469, 0.31660779528664473, 0.32463196604391964, 0.3256679787461576, 0.3267461849780341, 0.33210321626756056, 0.33396613444126544, 0.3348067721967347, 0.33705639984188096, 0.3405386554287154, 0.3405778060614345, 0.34164707821160745 ], "ids": [ 49759, 49751, 34362, 44678, 19726, 46657, 3701, 28205, 49760, 49763, 28207, 37251, 27166, 40386, 7100 ] }
49,759
This has been one of the best vampire movies that I have seen in a long time. It was very seductive and alluring, I liked that it did not have the usual gore and carnage that comes along with most vampire movies. The music was excellent. It would be great if there was a sequel.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.746364
14.702891
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.20974294029064167, 0.25515045785557655, 0.2622049461185013, 0.26406196743439214, 0.26447856693487426, 0.2653410320738808, 0.26682639570377853, 0.27258695406738165, 0.27542665677053335, 0.27952739629927004, 0.2838300716130824, 0.29140628795676515, 0.294478050788579, 0.3002955825938569 ], "ids": [ 49760, 46330, 19723, 25068, 49763, 27166, 573, 4318, 49757, 12782, 2055, 577, 37897, 37251, 37898 ] }
49,760
I remember disliking this movie the 1st time I saw it, but it has grown on me. I love the costumes and poses the actors make, the humor, the cinematography, the soundtrack. The scenes are very rich, and it moves very quickly. Every time I watch it, there is something new that catches my eye. Aaliyah as Akasha is probably the only thing that ruins it, but not enough.<br /><br />Also, the Lestat in this movie IS different, it is not the same character. You can see that the character Armand has been given Lestat-like qualities because I'm assuming Anne wanted it in. But there is no reason to trash this movie just because it's not like books, it's a fascinating by itself.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.032111
14.719809
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2364502491217847, 0.2811622466761897, 0.305909765801752, 0.3275434842995727, 0.3317663187644353, 0.3386902684349362, 0.35025566637625716, 0.35121393593442773, 0.3556465760892634, 0.35590243609710037, 0.3679125660282505, 0.36849238266432127, 0.36953204535482664, 0.3700075221452678 ], "ids": [ 49761, 49755, 49753, 28209, 49767, 28203, 34820, 28202, 49762, 31449, 28206, 3893, 28207, 10559, 4532 ] }
49,761
okay... first to Anne rice BOOK fans....<br /><br />sure lestat's eyes are not blue...sure he isn't blond in this movie... but even though Marius is not lestat's maker...even though they COMPLETELY altered the story.....<br /><br />how can u say its not a good movie..<br /><br />this movie...is the BEST vampire movie i ever saw...and lestat is pictured perfectly in it....maybe not his features...but i don't think one can find a better lestat....the way he speaks...and the way he looks at mere mortals...his arrogance..and sheer love for fame is pictured flawlessly.<br /><br />if u for once...consider it just a movie..and not try and relate every scene to the book...u will love the movie as much as i do.<br /><br />now...to the non readers..<br /><br />be prepared to fall absolutely in love with this movie....it has every thing....and the goth music...is like an added treat... the dialogues...are beautiful...and catching...and even though its a vampire movie..u will find yourself smiling...at the wit of the characters...and u will find yourself sympathizing with the vampires..<br /><br />overall...one of my fav movies...!!10/10
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.014595
14.774681
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.23839006186009493, 0.2523293716628102, 0.26997835271482873, 0.27416165794730607, 0.3201757789600229, 0.32663808588561416, 0.33928255983426603, 0.3497581631056178, 0.35121393593442773, 0.35322025056654127, 0.38320238942205365, 0.39515076969071816, 0.4090874165921946, 0.41566660468170646 ], "ids": [ 49762, 49752, 28203, 28202, 49758, 28206, 49751, 49766, 49756, 49761, 28204, 28207, 49769, 28210, 28209 ] }
49,762
I have to say this movie is absolutely amazing. I don't understand why it got such a low rating. It has romance, music, darkness and vampires. Also Stuart Townsend did a great job of being Lestat, the acting was great. Also, normally I am not into that music, well sometimes. But I have to say in this movie the music fit it perfectly. If you like dark movies about vampires this is definitely for you or even if you don't there is a love story to this.But,all I can say is one word: Amazing! My Rating is defiantly: 10 out of 10. Anyway, I seriously suggest you watch it. I remember not seeing this for years, I watched it again about a year ago and im addicted to it again. lol. Great movie!!!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.772989
14.660318
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.26406196743439214, 0.2820270995798084, 0.2842920639315534, 0.2851706055006914, 0.2942526678030152, 0.29972227283959196, 0.30129514748033337, 0.3031306554686489, 0.303517499253813, 0.30569698451512917, 0.3086043566889106, 0.31142061423224887, 0.3129104135834463, 0.3132671450700415 ], "ids": [ 49763, 49760, 4930, 3701, 45092, 34795, 49752, 2055, 11811, 49758, 25068, 49764, 573, 27166, 4163 ] }
49,763
***May Contain Spoilers*** OK, it wasn't exactly as good as expected in fact it was a lot different than I had thought it would be but it still turned out to be a pretty good movie.<br /><br />I usually don't care too much for that type of music but in this movie it worked perfectly (I mean duh he's a rock star) but anyway I loved Stuart Townsend in this, and Aaliyah, although she had a small part in the movie was amazing.<br /><br />And even though Tom Cruise played Lestat in the Interview with a Vampire, I have to admit that I am glad he turned down the role even though I normally hate when they use different people to play the same characters in like sequels and stuff.<br /><br />Overall, the movie was great and I enjoyed watching it, even if there were parts that could have been better. Great vampire movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.869538
14.717169
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.284644236616143, 0.3011942505717268, 0.30386768961816724, 0.3086043566889106, 0.3411777431369992, 0.3416225164119904, 0.34398885154884207, 0.34562769579379893, 0.3467716647846587, 0.3471552404114906, 0.3513653366661369, 0.35217662692556717, 0.35511054579861834, 0.3551105724420911 ], "ids": [ 49764, 28204, 14463, 14460, 49763, 14465, 49758, 37251, 49755, 44926, 49752, 27166, 45093, 701, 699 ] }
49,764
Personally, I LOVED TRIS MOVIE! My best friend told me about it so i rented it out a watched it. It's amazing! The music, the acting, the story lines the emotion, everything...... well except for one minor fact. Absolutely no loyalty to the books at all. I saw this movie before Interview with the Vampire and before i even knew the books existed, so i was shocked to find how many people actually hated the movie. I picked up quickly that the book fans weren't at all happy with the unfaithfulness, not wanting to be hypocritical (I hate the Harry Potter movies due to lack of book loyalty)i stayed silent. Eventually i picked up "The Vampire Lestat" and understood immediately why everyone hated it. It is completely different (The movie Queen of the damned is a combination of "The Vampire Lestat" and "The Queen of the Damned"). But i still loved the movie from when i saw it before reading any of the books. So if you haven't seen this movie or read the book watch the movie first or you'll hate it. If you have read the book then you have every right to hate this movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.949043
14.733809
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3710979057846766, 0.37304343033466825, 0.37747858659649725, 0.37939316766431463, 0.3875391118438596, 0.38888714804453184, 0.39580673060693683, 0.3985264294127925, 0.39852647911230077, 0.40450890184344557, 0.404645037016225, 0.4052095647352735, 0.4111692579648132, 0.41125875173892446 ], "ids": [ 49765, 28207, 28203, 45092, 49751, 21000, 27166, 28205, 701, 699, 27386, 45091, 28204, 45093, 28202 ] }
49,765
I quite this Anne Rice book adaption. While most of the film is filmed here in Australia it offers a great amount of scenery and a fantastic area to shoot in. Lestat (Stuart Townsend) has recently woke up from a long period time of sleep and has decided to betray his vampire oath by revealing himself to a band. When he becomes a popular movie icon his fellow vampires, understadebly, go mad and plot his death. Meanwhile Jesse (Marguerite Moreau) a orphaned member of the supernatural studies, who has an ancient vampire family tree, has become deeply obsessed with Lestat. Her boss David (Paul McGann) understands her obsession and revaeals his obsession with the vampire Marius, (Vincent Perez)who is an ancient vampire and the man who made Lestat a vampire too. Jesse is given Lestats diary and reads of his first killing and an encounter with the Queen of the Damned- Akasha (Aaliyah). When Lestat holds a concert in Death Valley he receives news that not only will angry vampires be there Akasha may come as well. Meanwhile Akasha has other plans. She goes to a vampire coven, a bar, and kills everyone in her path. With Lestat tempted with royality and loving care by Akasha the ancient vampires consisting of Marius and Jesses Aunt Maharet (Lena Olin) plot against them. Join Her Or Die?<br /><br />I thought the film was fantastic, it had great fight scenes, great music and great locations. Aaliyah sadly passed away in a plane crash shortly before the films premiere, but she looked stunning on the set and off the sets.<br /><br />I gave this film 10/10 because it was a fantastic film and I urge you to see it!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.025202
14.769495
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3076400776631747, 0.3146201019642657, 0.33928255983426603, 0.3427714235842131, 0.35256417069501544, 0.3782041176328984, 0.385048682733773, 0.4094766581343928, 0.40963453666691463, 0.4312523539532581, 0.4383151978800567, 0.43976841686708745, 0.44776547727172145, 0.46654474851915206 ], "ids": [ 49766, 28203, 49769, 49762, 28206, 28202, 28209, 49751, 49750, 49758, 28208, 49761, 28204, 49755, 49752 ] }
49,766
In Queen of The Damned,Akasha(Aaliyah) was more sexy and had a bigger,demanding presence, she just caught your eye and attention. now the movie did have faults, like the lack of explaining Akasha's past. What i also Did not like was the that the movie didn't really explain or show more of what the relationship between Lestat and Akasha was/ or was like.Akasha's (Aaliyah's) role was sort of limited in the movie and she didn't appear until the 2nd half of the movie and then to top it off, her(Akasha's) death came 2 quickly.But i liked how Akasha fought back when the ancients tried to kill her, because in the book the last fight between Akasha and The ancients was rather boring (they killed Akasha in like 2 secs).Akasha's head got knocked off in 1 sec and Lestat turned into the biggest punk in the world.<br /><br />Aaliyah played Akasha very well and Stuart was perfect as Lestat, they could not have picked a better Akasha or Lestat. "REST IN PEACE AALIYAH"
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.055195
14.76351
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.29244456908015026, 0.32570597856109196, 0.3275434842995727, 0.3559691990249211, 0.4147124984595858, 0.42725315083907334, 0.43733737975231524, 0.44455290197143515, 0.470273034217208, 0.4715282791067783, 0.47709155684311455, 0.4810165602853943, 0.4899668936741409, 0.49129627082373306 ], "ids": [ 49767, 49755, 49753, 49761, 49770, 28209, 28202, 28206, 49751, 4093, 33626, 20675, 7153, 36450, 49062 ] }
49,767
quite good, don't expect anything high culture.......the acting is bad, the storyline fails, but it is still a fairly nice movie to watch. why? because it's dark, a little bit stupid, like unpredictable and just entertaining and fun to watch. do not expect anything, like i said, just see it for yourself and you know what i mean.<br /><br />it is a movie, without a plot or memorable acting, but there are enough scenes that will make you laugh, cry or at least make you feel compelled to watch it to the end...<br /><br />this is all i wanted to say....<br /><br />7 / 10
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.297735
11.300961
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.25241999700780693, 0.2743337078922752, 0.2835677371064408, 0.29216342808783347, 0.30082237961591485, 0.3039245469256773, 0.30528775871643765, 0.31310350295608913, 0.31577350209312416, 0.31724649319721554, 0.31733373440639656, 0.3200434210946085, 0.3205486131627675, 0.3210462489096798 ], "ids": [ 49768, 465, 18529, 15779, 48403, 12427, 1797, 49515, 29594, 20251, 22527, 31804, 25764, 7108, 4816 ] }
49,768
I haven't read the Anne Rice novel that this movie was based on, but who knows, maybe reading the book is cheaper than renting QUEEN OF THE DAMNED and is probably better for your health. It isn't that this movie is necessarily bad for your health, but a book can be very relaxing and certainly exercises the active part of your brain more so than this movie. You can count the number of pages by Anne Rice that I've read on one hand, but after seeing this movie and Interview with a Vampire, I get the feeling that she writes really good novels. The plots for both movies hint at a whole sea of deep and interwoven vampire history.<br /><br />Still, Stuart Townsend's voice-over narration gets a heck of a lot more annoying than Brad Pitt's vampire narrative ever did, and you can tell that QUEEN OF THE DAMNED's limited production resources barely give enough flesh to the Anne Rice storyline. While Interview decided to go with lace and elegance, QUEEN relies on low budget special effects that try really hard to be taken seriously. One can see that the original novel had potential as a movie and that the production team focused its attention in the wrong places. The costumes and rock & roll stage could have been replaced with more blood and an eerier soundtrack.<br /><br />However, I'll give credit where credit is due. The soundtrack is excellent. Korn and Disturbed had me down with the sickness bobbing my noggin like Butthead.<br /><br />The film opens with a very cool Goth-rock zoom & splice montage, but after the first ten minutes or so, the directing degenerates quickly. It's as if the movie was so long that the director realized that there wasn't enough time and enough money to do an Anne Rice novel justice. What results are some mediocre vampire scenes and plenty of cheesy special effects. Unfortunately, QUEEN OF THE DAMNED fails to do the genre justice just as its John Carpenter counterparts fail to impress. Where are the yellow contacts? Where's the pale blue make-up? Scene after scene, I shook my head reminiscing about the days of Salem's Lot and Fright Night when low budget was done right.<br /><br />There are redeeming qualities though that save this movie from being garbage. Props to Aaliyah, and may her soul forever rest in peace. She might have become a renowned actress, had her life not been taken from us so prematurely, for she did give this movie a decent performance with plenty of nice belly dancing. Did I mention that the soundtrack was good? Let's see, what else can I say? It wasn't too long. The Anne Rice novel could have easily been a three hour movie if an ambitious director like Francis Ford Coppola got his hands on it. There are a few twists and turns here and there in the plot. But all in all it was a legitimate rock and roll addition to the slew of second-rate vampire movies out there. The director of this movie went on to direct a new Battlestar Galactica mini series if that tells you anything.<br /><br />JY<br /><br />Jimboduck-dot-com
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.026609
14.747965
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.20977911489329815, 0.251523159965491, 0.26350642342537967, 0.3146201019642657, 0.34763314667566747, 0.3590015227697536, 0.36166434869462005, 0.3665102015241486, 0.3712639669298162, 0.3928821526661336, 0.39515076969071816, 0.39819538930794474, 0.4005103355524048, 0.40253025527131503 ], "ids": [ 49769, 28209, 49751, 28203, 49766, 28205, 28202, 28207, 28206, 28208, 37260, 49762, 28210, 5333, 3125 ] }
49,769
Aaliyah blows all the female cast members out of the water, including the official love interest Marguerite Moreau.<br /><br />I would have loved to see this movie play out as Akasha's power trip. Aaliyah is simply electrifying whenever she is on the screen. She does sensual, beautiful and menacing to the power of 10. Watching her take on a bar full of vampires is a sight to behold.<br /><br />Lena Olin is cast in the ungrateful role of "the older woman", which is hugely unjustified. She looks fantastic and at 46 (according to the IMDb) still looks stunning.<br /><br />The story unfortunately is very limited plot wise, we've seen it all before, etc.<br /><br />The most heart wrenching is Akasha's death scene, especially keeping in mind what happened to Aaliyah after filming.<br /><br />All in all, a remarkable vampire movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-4.002452
14.69073
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3136094557348228, 0.3559691990249211, 0.3632837377131851, 0.37430483275793236, 0.38041974779709753, 0.39394153366089824, 0.4093951165656804, 0.4245967392483315, 0.4247568258785387, 0.43117440677334407, 0.43270535427068435, 0.4344483315332186, 0.4349172725144014, 0.442005313970508 ], "ids": [ 49770, 49755, 49767, 49753, 33660, 49761, 28208, 28209, 4689, 30219, 1909, 22690, 16681, 35691, 9725 ] }
49,770
I was looking in the TV Guide for movies that come from Germany and I found one called The Bunnyguards, so I watched it and I laughed myself silly! I wanted the DVD but its not available here (I could order it from Germany but it doesn't have subtitles) It was played again so I taped it and watch it from time to time.<br /><br />Anyway, I looked for info on it and found out its real name is Erkan & Stefan, but I know it by its Australian title: The Bunnyguards.<br /><br />Some people who I know from Germany do not like Erkan & Stefan because of their accents, but not being German myself, I didn't notice anything. The jokes are good, but some Germans might find their accents off-putting.<br /><br />I think this movie is funny and if the DVD had English subtitles on all the extras (having a 2 disk edition with only the feature having subtitles would be bad) I would buy it up in a snap!<br /><br />I recommend it to anyone looking for a laugh and a pretty good story.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.190344
8.017807
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.37799980222420193, 0.38032244280930017, 0.38404549934985077, 0.3925075989387823, 0.40190561269854863, 0.4076800913274937, 0.4143088262707716, 0.41957805992534836, 0.4391244766842417, 0.44340000677895963, 0.44709290193903706, 0.4631003264005845, 0.46312441540145977, 0.46473837351559133 ], "ids": [ 49771, 36316, 49774, 49426, 15304, 49776, 49775, 28212, 48314, 49773, 9629, 28043, 14124, 36816, 38409 ] }
49,771
I enjoyed Erkan & Stefan – a cool and fast story which didn't get bogged down in detail. Those two guys are great to see and are able to come up with new ideas all the time. The high quality of picture and cut support the movie a lot.<br /><br />Erkan & Stefan show that the German film industry is capable of transferring successful Hollywood concepts with local `satire' into our cinemas.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.184285
8.002903
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3006154936633595, 0.33055583049315884, 0.3388933207422966, 0.3451920940156378, 0.37229937790971646, 0.4352334793448812, 0.4475899757323314, 0.4504881788079015, 0.45535967285384515, 0.4573950543291323, 0.4627727773473398, 0.4676023485456441, 0.46787100462409936, 0.47390545340702406 ], "ids": [ 49772, 49775, 49773, 49776, 49774, 28211, 4777, 21722, 28038, 21238, 12506, 12783, 27481, 18670, 23915 ] }
49,772
Those two main characters Erkan and Stefan are a munich comedy act. I was wondering if this is one of these typical slapstick movies where the story is either not important or simply not existing. But when I saw this movie I was very happy that there is a cool story and the main characters really fit in it.<br /><br />All in all very amusing and not a common german movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.154716
7.977439
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.19163719150100267, 0.2657087338024958, 0.30517007099444793, 0.33055583049315884, 0.34683718834387345, 0.3897609367484963, 0.4391244766842417, 0.44647677364458205, 0.44704808168275856, 0.4503057074815918, 0.45074727206820175, 0.4533336408884793, 0.45964467045730206, 0.46640367647737035 ], "ids": [ 49773, 49775, 49774, 49776, 49772, 28211, 27694, 49771, 5370, 29534, 9629, 36316, 15425, 29381, 14267 ] }
49,773
Great movie. I was laughing all time through. Why? Well, I am from Austria, I can get along with the German (Bavarian) kind of humor. So I guess this movie makes only sense watching when you are German native speaker. Stefan and Erkan both are talking in a new kind of turkish-german accent, which became really popular in our Countries (GER & AUT). But of course they are very stupid. As in every comedy your personal humor will decide, whether thumb up or down.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.158262
7.986972
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.17359437936243172, 0.257539795633998, 0.2657087338024958, 0.3451920940156378, 0.36806095765446956, 0.37255689480887155, 0.38032244280930017, 0.3812586601392719, 0.3937687887890037, 0.39565132143300075, 0.405837654642222, 0.4064782738619078, 0.41103838623486455, 0.41963088548647465 ], "ids": [ 49774, 49775, 49776, 49773, 49772, 42984, 11986, 49771, 28211, 9629, 45654, 48482, 28212, 36638, 7520 ] }
49,774
First of all, i am from munich, where this movie takes place, and believe it or not, there are guys like Erkan and Stefan, including the silly dialect! I know their comedy show from the beginning and my main fear was, that the movie is just an assembling of their already known jokes, but it is not! The jokes are evolved through the story, and make, in their own special way, sense. But if you absolutely dislike Erkan und Stefan, hands of this movie. Everyone else - it's worth viewing!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.157054
7.989013
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.17359437936243172, 0.19163719150100267, 0.26423787047005554, 0.3006154936633595, 0.3697164357623186, 0.4076800913274937, 0.4346880823590682, 0.43921502732924156, 0.44246983163755826, 0.4427736626172619, 0.4444803809855038, 0.4460743899532357, 0.44662432567433297, 0.44895732345712136 ], "ids": [ 49775, 49774, 49773, 49776, 49772, 28211, 49771, 36638, 43380, 48738, 27694, 42984, 9629, 28212, 11762 ] }
49,775
I gave 9 of 10 points. I was sitting in tears nearly the whole movie, because I had to laugh!<br /><br />The story of course wasn't excellent, but it also wasn't boring. Erkan & Stefan are assigned to become bodyguards for the beautiful Nina. While doing this job they come between the "front-lines" of BND and CIA. Of course the two are neither born bodyguards nor gentlemen, so they run from one disaster into another; and they do this in such a funny way, that when you watch some scenes you won't be able to stop the tears! As actors those two "dumbly grinning" characters do quite well, better than some so called professional.<br /><br />You think, the speech of the two heroes is curios or "pseudo-foreign"? Well, if you hear quite a lot Turkish-German people in Munich speaking exactly like them, you will remember Erkan & Stefan. And maybe, in 10 years it might have become the common speech of the youth. (God forbid!)<br /><br />So, if you like to laugh, watch this movie!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.219959
8.005769
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.257539795633998, 0.26423787047005554, 0.27632191100409886, 0.30517007099444793, 0.3388933207422966, 0.36369200430447746, 0.3843224897725315, 0.38876879921000906, 0.397959961159043, 0.4008285667013253, 0.4011969015435589, 0.40128147966444283, 0.4014900661619908, 0.40190561269854863 ], "ids": [ 49776, 49774, 49775, 28211, 49773, 49772, 47983, 6031, 47985, 28212, 15034, 29534, 36638, 3501, 49771 ] }
49,776
These three directors are off to Good Beginnings. The three stories are remarkably well-done for independent productions and capture those traumatic feelings of "coming out" when you aren't really sure it's a good idea. I laughed at those veiled glances around the dressing room in "Pool Days"; I smiled at the notion that fans of Bette Midler, Judy Garland, and Barbra Streisand are assumed to be gay in "A Friend of Dorothy"(ie. browsing through the CD music racks); and I cringed over the "jock" in "The Disco Years" whose memory of sweet sex was now "blurred" by liquor. It all seemed so real. I look forward to more offerings from this trio of directors.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.224608
10.942232
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3349047119726285, 0.33541681964029724, 0.3488614226727589, 0.3789928200543108, 0.38106665095063363, 0.38210021480807943, 0.39013075884541737, 0.39070738789671655, 0.398898687748799, 0.4023662300191383, 0.40257695621337775, 0.40403159261622446, 0.40720162575073504, 0.4079489973334718 ], "ids": [ 49777, 49779, 28213, 6722, 31942, 10015, 10907, 7767, 10988, 44880, 6723, 7592, 36278, 7987, 7590 ] }
49,777
The trio are a pleasant, nostalgic journey to that first hint of desire--when it was still about simple exploration of the unknown--before we "grew up" and added those complexities of HIV status, emotional baggage and gotta-run-my-pager-just-went-off into the emotional mix.<br /><br />The angst portrayed is pure adolescent angst, but it rings true in all three stories. Their sweetness and positivity make you feel good that you are gay. And those kinds of films are few and far between.<br /><br />Good news! Both Boys Life and Boys Life 2 are now readily available on DVD as of September 1999.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.397705
10.837154
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.40792849911003615, 0.42750822758933027, 0.43523926595157225, 0.436128950651098, 0.44240473306760175, 0.4460449357619527, 0.4497314223972494, 0.4497314223972494, 0.4504334392298812, 0.4523978275640612, 0.45359453040381115, 0.45451950951769104, 0.4575446264229035, 0.4579666487046149 ], "ids": [ 49778, 10907, 21732, 46779, 45607, 22183, 49780, 27295, 35909, 28213, 35564, 13800, 49373, 15193, 19786 ] }
49,778
It's quite an accomplishment that three stories filmed by three very different filmmakers could be simultaneously so insightful about gay & bi-sexual relationships, and their struggles! <br /><br />"Pool Days" is about the awkwardness of adolescence, and the mutual attraction between an older man and a younger one. A story about experience and vulnerability!<br /><br />"A Friend Of Dorothy" portrays a common dilemma many gay and bi-sexual people experience at some point in their life: the intense attraction towards someone whom is heterosexual. Sensitively examined, this story truly left me feeling moved!<br /><br />"The Disco Years" shows another version of a no-win situation: getting involved with someone who is not only confused about their sexual orientation, but is also terrified of being exposed as anything other than straight! A very empowering story for those of us who have experienced betrayal at the hands of a sexually confused and frightened person! <br /><br />While these three stories will appeal to anyone who has an iota of empathy towards others, they will psychologically empower those who consider themselves gay, bi-sexual or searching. Each story is uplifting in its own unique way!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.252381
10.908792
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.31512140070675665, 0.3349047119726285, 0.34076167668224155, 0.35300679016610936, 0.3603061884890475, 0.3653201470134596, 0.36990616092942097, 0.3727877197377628, 0.374309459974122, 0.3746961639278934, 0.37702728009997644, 0.37733603368170676, 0.3835101201527482, 0.3837115815912254 ], "ids": [ 49779, 23243, 49777, 7987, 45640, 45587, 10907, 16035, 23244, 22188, 45608, 45607, 46333, 6015, 7590 ] }
49,779
This trio of 30-minute short films on gay-related themes are all quite respectably executed. Each coming-of-age story is played out with pleasant charm and naturalness. This film deserves to be widely distributed and easily obtainable. However, it isn't. I had to order my video copy; none of the local video stores or even the libraries had it in stock.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-3.440099
10.906665
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2800689370656003, 0.3046194296284658, 0.3077072096529194, 0.31349936083120244, 0.3145676864377587, 0.3178785633229425, 0.31870888239805095, 0.32355532058837866, 0.32388862025059206, 0.3239382560815147, 0.3264258151263787, 0.3289593108977491, 0.33565757492420245, 0.33582199056357565 ], "ids": [ 49780, 28213, 23243, 45607, 34552, 9151, 10907, 46333, 22188, 7767, 15144, 6720, 6724, 4406, 42440 ] }
49,780
This little short absolutely fascinates me.<br /><br />The only thing I've seen thus far like it is some of the work by Sam Brakhage, the creator of Dog Star Man. However, where Brakhage is trying to unnerve by "making us learn how to see again" and provide us with an affront of head-ache inducing bright colors and flashes (which I still totally dig and embrace as high art...), this film I would characterize as very relaxing and hypnotizing. Man Ray's general use of spinning objects/camera does not create so much of a dizzy feeling but a warm flow of senses, intermingling and going along with the gravity of the moving world around us.<br /><br />An interesting conceit of this very short work is that as it goes along, objects become more and more recognizable until we end on a nude torso (of which I feel is the least feminine well-rounded breasts I've ever seen). The circles and spirals of shadow and light over the torso make it an object of surrealistic beauty, something that you could hang on your wall and delve over forever. It's because of this and other images in this film that I had to watch it again and again (eventually a total seven times) just because it utterly fascinates me.<br /><br />--PolarisDiB
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.534451
10.508244
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.40881780642220833, 0.4143540258464593, 0.4174333877532802, 0.4174333877532802, 0.4230891020243721, 0.42497526570750555, 0.4276921189417966, 0.4290725126014302, 0.43267052483879076, 0.4331302604645034, 0.4353270377708873, 0.4439274875830356, 0.4502303488607142, 0.4519718996402401 ], "ids": [ 49781, 43649, 47967, 38404, 38408, 46110, 35016, 19991, 35879, 40097, 33256, 22590, 6391, 40604, 19680 ] }
49,781
After 10 viewings in 20 years I too think this was the Crazy Gang's best effort on film, with more cohesion in the plot than their next best, "Alf's Button Afloat". They were indeed a crazy trio of double acts thrown together mainly on stage, sometimes in front of royalty, until Chesney Allen retired in the '40's through "ill-health". He outlived them all by years. Apparently they were just as mad outside "work", regularly playing practical jokes on one another.<br /><br />The Six Wonder Boys troupe head for I'll-Get-Her-To-Tell-Me (Alaska) to dig for the gold that was being found there. It seemed a better idea than going to Mansfield ... because they'd been there. When they get to Red Gulch they find their information was a mere 40 years out of date - they thought that the chips that were in the guilty newspaper they'd read tasted funny. But by then it doesn't matter as they've all fallen in love with Snow White and want to help her grandad find his long lost stash of gold. Baddie Bill "M" McGrew wants it himself however.<br /><br />The number of verbal and visual puns is astonishing, but most of them will probably only make sense(?) to Brits and ex-pats interested in seeing '30's British b&w comedies. Imho nearly all of the gags and routines work, including the Gold If patter between Bud & Chesney and the "Whistle While You Work" pastiche - even the "Always Getting Our Man" Mountie inserts. A marvellous little film, in a rather tired looking condition but utterly recommended.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
1.258181
10.031186
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4086626656313408, 0.42407112341359876, 0.4244635018060614, 0.4457708474579507, 0.4687889566817759, 0.4764430394270336, 0.4869835225406174, 0.4884816309110096, 0.4932394796374575, 0.49468433073065954, 0.49519038644593916, 0.4952836046225566, 0.4974412953522954, 0.49759853053077996 ], "ids": [ 49782, 49784, 30870, 26689, 37050, 32729, 5124, 28794, 42200, 36121, 29559, 27063, 6272, 42164, 42177 ] }
49,782
I had never read much about (or even seen stills of) the six-man British comedy group The Crazy Gang, but my positive experiences with their contemporaries Will Hay and Arthur Askey – and especially Graham Greene’s high praise of THE FROZEN LIMITS itself (“The funniest English picture yet produced…it can bear comparison with SAFETY LAST and THE GENERAL”) – made me take the plunge with the bare-bones R2 DVDs from Network of this and their subsequent film GASBAGS (1941; see below), both of which were released earlier this year with virtually no fanfare.<br /><br />A British-made Western is a rarity, but a British Western spoof is rarer still (CARRY ON COWBOY [1965] was still some 25 years away). Incidentally, going back to the Silent classics mentioned by Greene, the film seems to me to be more obviously indebted to THE GOLD RUSH (1925) and WAY OUT WEST (1937). Besides, it also plays like a variation on the “Snow White And The Seven Dwarfs” fairy-tale (which had just been immortalized on the screen via Walt Disney’s animated masterwork) and where the seventh member is played by ancient comic and frequent Will Hay foil Moore Marriott; the Gang actually call pretty heroine Eileen Bell by that name throughout, and there’s even an amusing sequence with the six of them preparing to go to bed and whistling the dwarfs’ song from the Disney film! <br /><br />Six comedians (three sets of comedy duos: Flanagan & Allen, Nervo & Knox and Naughton & Gold) may be the largest such grouping on film – though not all of their personalities emerge here: my favorites were big Bud Flanagan (looking a bit like Jim Backus), straight man Chesney Allen and moustached, squeaky-voiced Teddy Knox; however, bald Charlie Naughton often took the limelight – since he’s the one on which the others always seemed to pick on. Still, it’s Marriott who steals the film from his very first scene – where he contrives to impersonate every official in the dilapidated theater of a ghost town!; a very young Bernard Lee is also notable as the villain of the piece.<br /><br />The Ore routine between Flanagan and Allen actually anticipates Abbott and Costello’s famous “Who’s On First?” (the film, in fact, hinges on a lot of wordplay for its humor – which doesn’t necessarily travel, especially at this juncture). Nevertheless, there are several hilarious sequences throughout – a few of which even brought tears to my eyes: the opening scene where the Gang are defrocked by a band of angry creditors; their dressing up as Indians once they hit the Yukon; the Gang’s ruse to make everybody rich with the same piece of gold; they all impersonate the sleepwalking Marriott to confuse the villains (a gag which may owe its origin to the Marx Bros.’ hilarious mirror sequence in DUCK SOUP [1933]); the spot-on theater sketch which pokes fun at hoary melodramas; the surreal moment when, pursued by the villains, one of the Gang climbs a staircase that is part of the painted scenery in the theater; and especially towards the end, when a group of singing Mounted Police gallop ever so slowly to the Gang’s rescue (despite being egged on by the increasingly impatient Ranger hero).<br /><br />The thinny soundtrack and the frantic nature of the gags themselves made it hard for me to get all the jokes sometimes – subtitles would certainly have been welcome in this case. The Crazy Gang only made five films – with the first two also being well-regarded, OKAY FOR SOUND (1937) and ALF’S BUTTON AFLOAT (1938), and a much later reunion (though Allen had, by this time, bowed out due to ill-health and been replaced by Eddie Gray) called LIFE IS A CIRCUS (1960; directed by Val Guest who, incidentally, co-wrote both Gang films I purchased as well as some of the afore-mentioned Hay and Askey vehicles!).
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
1.41405
9.875996
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.35966652939163357, 0.38484394780138187, 0.4120266612002542, 0.41565226438799163, 0.42071857829028825, 0.42122723989833555, 0.4219712575233835, 0.42357303451573425, 0.4324564854995391, 0.4381525706669428, 0.44311282999926493, 0.44377698739007054, 0.44580017884282386, 0.4467741468736176 ], "ids": [ 49783, 49785, 34117, 27066, 13099, 42629, 33759, 7622, 48747, 19300, 25825, 19506, 38002, 17947, 13733 ] }
49,783
After getting thrown out of their last job and finding employment scarce in the United Kingdom, the six members of the Wonder Boys, better known as The Crazy Gang see an advertisement for employment in the gold strike town of Red Gulch in the Yukon Territory. It's from a newspaper clipping and on the back there's a story about Chamberlain saying the country better be prepared for war. Off they go to the Yukon and The Frozen Limits.<br /><br />By the way, it's case of misplaced Chamberlains. The clipping is forty years old and it refers to Joe Chamberlain and the Boer War rather than Neville in the current crisis. But that's typical of how things go for this crew. I can see Stan Laurel making the same mistake.<br /><br />Of course when they get there it's a ghost town inhabited only by young Jean Kent and her grandfather Moore Marriott. He's getting on in years and is a bit touched in the head. Marriott's got a gold mine that he's misplaced somewhere that he goes to in his sleep, that is when he's sleepwalking. The Gang better help him find that mine or otherwise pretty Ms. Kent won't marry stalwart trapper Anthony Hulme, but rather saloon owner Bernard Lee, a fate worse than death.<br /><br />This was my first exposure to the Crazy Gang and I can see both why they were so acclaimed in the UK and why they never made any impact across the pond. The jokes come fast and furious and then were a number of things that the Code in the USA just wouldn't allow. The jokes are also strictly topical British and a lot just wouldn't be gotten over here.<br /><br />The sight gags are universal, the final chase scene is worthy of anything that the Marx Brothers did in America. My suggestion is that if you watch The Frozen Limits, tape it if you have a working familiarity with British history and run it two or three times just to make sure you pick up everything. It will be worth it.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
1.361384
9.963932
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4086626656313408, 0.5466784732158889, 0.5519784246713555, 0.5699906818616013, 0.5704577381948948, 0.575229638385879, 0.5794612811287922, 0.5805490426439038, 0.5813436105118108, 0.583426160046161, 0.5862012847799463, 0.5881524534072037, 0.5894071253289535, 0.5942820850363753 ], "ids": [ 49784, 49782, 16809, 42379, 13098, 4378, 12882, 26388, 26368, 16521, 42368, 197, 5682, 45779, 25826 ] }
49,784
The Frozen Limits is a big screen vehicle for the artists known as The Crazy Gang. They were a group of British entertainers who formed in the early 1930s. In the main the group's six men were Bud Flanagan, Chesney Allen, Jimmy Nervo, Teddy Knox, Charlie Naughton and Jimmy Gold. Hugely popular in the variety halls the group were also darlings of the then Royal Family. The plot here sees them as the Wonder Boys troupe who set off to seek their fortunes in Alaska after reading about a gold rush in the newspaper. Only problem is is that when they finally get to Red Gulch it turns out they are 40 years too late!<br /><br />I often cringe when I see the statement "it's very British" because it implies that those not of the British Isles may struggle to get it. The reason it bothers me is because in this www/internet age I have garnered a ream of non British film loving friends who have been known to split their sides at the best of Ealing, Will Hay and the imperious Terry-Thomas. So, then, is it true that something such as The Frozen Limits is unlikely to be appreciated by a non British audience? Well yes it's true, so much here is topically British, but really it has to be said that the classic movie fan is pretty well versed in history, and when all is said and done the visual mirth here is universal. With the anarchic "not" so wild west make over an absolute winner. A winner that has every chance of being more appreciated by an American audience now than it will be by a British audience. Not all the comedy works, and in truth the "big 6" are trumped big time by a film stealing Moore Marriott. But there are skits and parodies here that deserve respect and a nod of approval from more illustrious comedy acts. You are unlikely to nearly fall off your chair like I did because of an Ovaltine gag, but if you be a classic comedy film fan? I feel sure that you will at the worst acknowledge there's some very talented people at work here.<br /><br />Now then, dose the Mounties always get their man? 8/10
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
1.226152
10.59344
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.35966652939163357, 0.44627997640247874, 0.45594042444398064, 0.4617345830043541, 0.4719865443096185, 0.47717135538770916, 0.47717135538770916, 0.48352176674145697, 0.4871815955359674, 0.4907410354682281, 0.5030397949489571, 0.5066202702804559, 0.5067495279168651, 0.5114629984121881 ], "ids": [ 49785, 49783, 22017, 34498, 4247, 23028, 32425, 26422, 32697, 26860, 32993, 17254, 37300, 11373, 30191 ] }
49,785
Britain and France declared war on Germany in 1939, but by then, almost all of Europe had fallen under the advance of the Nazi war machine. Entering the war, Britain virtually started from scratch, with scarce supplies and with an air force that was outnumbered by Germany ten to one. But the will of the Brits was firm, emboldened by their new Prime Minister Winston Churchill who declared - "We shall never go under".<br /><br />On August 8, 1940, the Battle for Britain was on. However for the first time since Hitler's declared stance to conquer the world, he hit a wall. Though massively outnumbered, the British Royal Air Force went on the offensive, and in the span of twenty eight days in September and October of 1940, German Luftwaffe casualties climbed to two thousand three hundred seventy five lost planes and crew. Hitler's rage was seething, but he had to call a momentary time out. Responding later in the year, Hitler launched a massive fire bombing of London on Christmas Day of 1940. When I say that there has never been a disaster movie to rival the real live footage of London in flames during this assault would be an understatement. Perhaps the most surreal effect of this chapter in the "Why We Fight" series would be seeing British citizens emerge from their underground shelters following the bombing raids to resume what was left of their life above ground. Even as you watch, there is no way to comprehend the living horror these people must have gone through, as the city of London was left in virtual ruin.<br /><br />Yet the Nazis were stunned and stymied as well. Everything Hitler wanted to believe about freedom and democracy was now turned on it's head. Instead of being weak willed and complacent like the French, the British were not going to give up without a fight. And fight they did, taking the air battle to Germany and responding in kind with attacks on the German homeland. It was a turning point, forcing Hitler to rethink his strategy.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
0.515918
7.821571
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.43248928822233523, 0.43398681194479993, 0.4414376342798152, 0.44312092864278707, 0.4564284886460035, 0.4762359499316464, 0.48030590386942273, 0.4858898109750519, 0.486607700582536, 0.4889937928495369, 0.49157651819306913, 0.49183628873106056, 0.503964671375958, 0.5042292141223446 ], "ids": [ 49786, 23231, 23229, 49787, 20627, 18941, 13123, 18944, 1477, 32316, 43744, 17715, 48837, 18933, 18925 ] }
49,786
With all of mainland Europe under his control Hitler prepares for the last obstacle in his way before heading for North America, Great Britain. With an overwhelming edge in aircraft Goering's Luftwaffe looks unstoppable on paper. Once in the air however the RAF tenaciously disrupts the paradigm by blowing the enemy out of sky air at a seven to one rate. The Battle of Britain rages on for a over a year as the Island nation is bloodied but unbowed providing crucial time for their American allies to produce more arms for the inevitable struggle. <br /><br />Using more staged footage than the three previous documentaries in the Why We Fight series the Battle of Britain has a more propaganda like feel to it with the dramatized (some with unmistakable Warners music score ) scenes glaringly obvious to newsreel. In an ironic twist amid the devastation caused by German air attacks Beethoven's Seventh Symphony is employed to underscore the visual suffering. The story itself is one of remarkable courage by a defiant nation who refused to buckle under to the devastating attacks inflicted upon it by up until that point an invincible war machine. It is the 20th century version of the 300 Spartans.<br /><br />There have been more exhaustively researched and better looking commercial efforts done on this battle since this film but the immediacy and motivation The Battle of Britain provided then will always make it a more valuable document of England during its "Finest Hour".
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
0.745341
7.952715
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3770761288859571, 0.396881466196358, 0.4135157180138479, 0.41774756695070747, 0.4292201292423733, 0.4369828319287531, 0.4414376342798152, 0.4443579918284821, 0.4461213028747515, 0.4522591470842162, 0.4542071104882548, 0.45934344908703983, 0.4596817058118803, 0.4836297907015531 ], "ids": [ 49787, 43750, 23231, 43744, 18933, 18932, 43511, 49786, 4572, 43752, 4196, 18934, 34174, 18924, 42666 ] }
49,787
Two college buddies - one an uptight nerd, the other a rude slob - embark on a road trip through the country. On the way, they encounter a vicious vehicle that looks like an army tank combined with a monster truck, that tries to run their car over. They escape it, but only enrage the mysterious and dangerous driver more when one of them takes a leak in the top hatch while at a rest stop. Later on, they pick up a sexy hitchhiker who ends up getting involved in their life threatening situation. MONSTER MAN is an extremely entertaining horror-comedy that has some good suspenseful moments as well as some good gory ones. The two lead characters and their constant bickering is fun to watch all on its own and the end takes a TCM-like turn which was very well-done. Absolutely worth checking out.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.348514
14.408472
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.25393425904099975, 0.29731175768045115, 0.30006338278494893, 0.30879325890761133, 0.3280977091548347, 0.33074960167362233, 0.3449901103429869, 0.3561750854070289, 0.3577436321900235, 0.3603398579150757, 0.3652939772514978, 0.36980230994396, 0.37709700040783123, 0.3784057721485974 ], "ids": [ 49788, 49984, 49993, 28400, 49997, 49983, 49982, 49995, 49986, 49987, 49991, 49999, 49989, 49990, 28396 ] }
49,788
This is a perfect movie to watch with a loved one on a cold and snowy night. If you like a few laughs with your horror then this is the movie for you. The makings of a real cult classic. It has everything you would want to see in a horror movie. A beautiful girl, A hero, The buffoon, A MONSTER TRUCK and of course a family of mutant satanic killers. This one is full of blood,guts and gore. I strongly recommend watching this one in the wee early morning hours, and be careful of who sees you being entertained by the sounds of Monster trucks, Bad {But Funny } One liners and our Hero eating eye ball stew. Not as good as the Evil Dead but a close second. Just remember WARNING..... Do NOT EAT BEFORE VIEWING THIS FILM...
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.908482
14.345967
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.2919686061960215, 0.29941301012130994, 0.30162868197774384, 0.30962248655235347, 0.310622056935297, 0.31206859388499597, 0.3134621196869337, 0.315579014241386, 0.3165105779996348, 0.31655372464237796, 0.3189666356685623, 0.3194802752307496, 0.3204450779801553, 0.3213441394852743 ], "ids": [ 49789, 49872, 22255, 44517, 18539, 48961, 1227, 18526, 48967, 27706, 9766, 43129, 29539, 7316, 29141 ] }
49,789
I know that Chill Wills usually played lovable old sorts in Westerns. But his role in this segment is something I've remembered for a long time. Wills could be a first rate villain. Yes, Burgess Meredith's Fall was correct! That look in Hepplewhite's eye! It expressed porcine greed, ignorance, and the threat of violence all at once. Quite a performance, I think.<br /><br />The segment itself was a good one, too. Question: couldn't the little black bag cure alcoholism? I guess it did, sort of, with Fall. But the doctor would have been wise to apply the cure, if he had it, as quickly as possible to Hepplewhite.<br /><br />There is one moment that was annoying but also necessary. And it is something that appears to recur in these Night Gallery segments. It's Serling's constant need to sermonize. For that's what we got, one more time, with Dr. Fall. I don't know what was more frustrating, losing the black bag and all its miracles or not being to stop Fall from preaching about the bag's benefit for humanity, all while rubbing Hepplewhite's greedy face in the mud, and, therefore, all but begging for Hepplewhite to strike out at him. But as I say, it was necessary. At least it was for me. Otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to see Wills' performance discussed above. All done without moving a muscle or speaking a word.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
0.720355
11.258214
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.5268160322454101, 0.5311084382372111, 0.5407680958254335, 0.541384344712037, 0.5524316512408165, 0.558483689501017, 0.5591152204408428, 0.5592174315231755, 0.5625801728168434, 0.5625801728168434, 0.5643995810655622, 0.5645760933171593, 0.5647194096471926, 0.5648046432183274 ], "ids": [ 49790, 35101, 11235, 5331, 3517, 29540, 4437, 8107, 8106, 28412, 27004, 37316, 10115, 25191, 44961 ] }
49,790
I can understand why others reacted rather unpleasantly towards the climax yielding a twist that really is hard to take seriously. I think, though, that the build-up to it works rather well. The music, quite menacing and spine-tingling, really provides a spooky aura matching the unforgiving sound of a constant ringing telephone that is driving struggling English actress, Joan Matlin(Jean Marsh)bonkers. She's borrowing a pal's nice apartment while attempting to jump-start her career in New York City(..the city buildings outside the window look about as realistic as David Letterman's)and is unceremoniously welcome by a noisy telephone which rings quite a bit, followed by loud slams against the wall. Searching for answers regarding the one responsible for such disregard towards her sanity, Joan discovers that no one rents that room, and that a former tenant had in fact strangled herself. Without help from the manager, Joan will decide to find out for herself who is causing her such anguish. Joan discovers the room empty and the phone with a particular female voice which will haunt her.<br /><br />The episode, I think, is a tour-de-force for Jean Marsh who is a one woman show. She's the only actress visible and we follow her through the crisis which slowly erodes her, the phone and the banging from that other room causing her much distress which grows into fear. Instead of leaving, Joan remains, so shaken by the noise and to the breaking point where she just wishes for the phone(..or whoever is ringing)to stop. The episode provides a possible answer as to who is plaguing Joan and why. A character named Beth comes into the story rather late as Joan struggles to find out whose female voice it was across the other line who knew her name on that dreaded phone she discovers in the room across from hers. The fate of Beth might just tell the viewer why Joan is being traumatized. I think this episode is an exercise in spooks instead of credibility;some didn't particularly like it, but I certainly did. I will admit that the phone, as a physical menace "crawling" towards Joan is hard to take seriously, not to mention it's attack on her, but I thought the intense opening twenty minutes before this were suitably chilling enough to make up for it.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-2.741073
12.589705
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.291089149773317, 0.3729059761799669, 0.45679664517318364, 0.45826040068404594, 0.4691372710006586, 0.47461663557883593, 0.47740940411187593, 0.4796378754288261, 0.48229836725398123, 0.48243654142826153, 0.4826557565429853, 0.4871373975798087, 0.48798697893134857, 0.4905295402877662 ], "ids": [ 49791, 49792, 28404, 4699, 35993, 25550, 34722, 49000, 11513, 29806, 36226, 15747, 1203, 27919, 36227 ] }
49,791
This "TFTD" episode from season one titled ironically "Answer Me" is a pretty well done and memorable episode, and it takes a shocking twist at the end. You have Jean Marsh as an over the hill and washed up actress from L.A. who's moved to New York City for an audition and she's living in an apartment provided by an old friend. Oddly every night she's kept awake by a ringing phone from the next door apartment, yet oddly enough the dwelling where the ringing phone continues to ring is unoccupied as the guests have been dead for many years. Finally she has to give in only she should have followed along and not answered the phone with no one home, as it's bad to get wrapped up in a phone with a life of it's own! Overall good episode a strange one though about a supernatural phone still it's suspenseful and it twists well at the end.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-2.786032
12.61609
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.291089149773317, 0.39659504380901556, 0.4760340172555335, 0.4834271658801974, 0.4970307864788811, 0.49787080423086294, 0.4990900616864563, 0.5012049376994089, 0.5071488263575088, 0.5161079573598002, 0.5207691442610107, 0.5232937352660729, 0.5262456645334805, 0.5266845240577611 ], "ids": [ 49792, 49791, 28404, 23444, 28220, 23434, 24468, 20121, 49496, 34431, 24821, 30729, 43837, 38164, 4699 ] }
49,792
My wife and I loved this film. Smart dialogue, great characters, clever plot construction. The pacing in this film is non-stop. Couldn't even get to the kitchen for some munchies. We have never seen Corey Feldman this funny. Taylor Nichols plays a good Fed...my wife loves him on that "Married Man" HBO show. The ensemble cast were all strong. The twist at the end had us cheering. That is why we give this film a "Standing O."
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.349071
10.055469
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.4254004542433597, 0.43066863045632564, 0.4362259710381482, 0.4409334537971975, 0.4423815804701, 0.4444491665075522, 0.4503288489991284, 0.45036425204582986, 0.45086986467605805, 0.4523854746827518, 0.4529782795759978, 0.45320685430071783, 0.45703488560897954, 0.45809933927420377 ], "ids": [ 49793, 46315, 39370, 13307, 16740, 39380, 42984, 46311, 49326, 12723, 44887, 25462, 21705, 43789, 46615 ] }
49,793
This picture doesn't have any big explosions or expensive chase sequences. However, it does have really wonderful performances and an exceptional script that puts this at the top of my "indie-must-see list." Taylor Nichols and James Remar are terrific together. The young cast surprised me with really consistent acting. Usually, indie pictures have some weak link, but there are no weak links here. Impressive. Go get this one.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.040524
11.086356
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3746053497779218, 0.3755014941338072, 0.4005254932485478, 0.40533222371091115, 0.4072628754306554, 0.4120319325397316, 0.4131759568269221, 0.4203581086400682, 0.42760533601731243, 0.4311729027130663, 0.4318509948076321, 0.4341820874068919, 0.4362489599771884, 0.4374304734369431 ], "ids": [ 49794, 23793, 42680, 24158, 38707, 40506, 48413, 2614, 19027, 49804, 16304, 18407, 21568, 42354, 46363 ] }
49,794
This movie about a group of small town teens that decide to rob the local bank is excellent. Brian (Justin Walker) wants to get out of his small town, much like Jimmy Stewart in "It's A Wonderful Life." However, unlike George Bailey, Brian is going to rob a bank to finance his dream of attending art school, even if his father is not supportive. The offer to Brian is to act like a customer and distract the guard. It's a tempting offer that if offered to many, I question what they would do. Anyways, Brian does it. When the Sheriff (James Remar) and his force surround the bank, things go from bad to worse. It's a standoff with even the Feds moving in to kill the kids if they have a clean shot. The Sheriff must prevent this and try to end the standoff in a peaceful way. Unfortunately, tensions rise, and the teens inside turn on each other. Some are out of control. The paper cutter scene is gruesome and hard to watch. Very intense!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.758329
12.012598
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.28919185419193694, 0.33012264993874385, 0.3393152886101394, 0.3405964133760706, 0.34110280468158916, 0.3411722992936759, 0.34260932577932324, 0.34451617158539527, 0.34546827651273704, 0.3504555164433746, 0.3591986562888384, 0.36384141305109075, 0.36387965331658545, 0.3648567459757902 ], "ids": [ 49795, 49796, 7210, 36905, 15781, 11738, 49802, 22263, 40775, 43287, 35310, 12058, 49201, 31866, 7623 ] }
49,795
I love this film. Tense with great characters. The kid from "Sandlot" is excellent as is Corey Feldman. When the kids storm the bank, it is pure adrenaline. Inside of the bank, it becomes a bit like a "Lord of the Flies" situation where they turn on each other. Justin Walker from "Clueless" is wonderful. I saw this on "Showtime" while channel surfing. It was a pleasant surprise. James Remar is also quite good here as the small town Sheriff. Taylor Nichols who I love from "Barcelona" does a nice job too as a Federal Agent. I recommend this film for any fan of bank robbery movies with a lot of good characters. I was shocked to discover that Roger Corman was a producer on this, since the film is not a B movie.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
0.414897
10.80785
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.28919185419193694, 0.30186494860836655, 0.3174976376214089, 0.32709970855827764, 0.347043080598616, 0.36684938479249485, 0.37141897317279704, 0.37355596229494015, 0.39610892130871567, 0.39615984136477933, 0.3968915328697947, 0.39858981779773284, 0.4007383292338629, 0.40159270043769535 ], "ids": [ 49796, 49795, 49802, 15781, 11738, 40768, 45756, 44357, 267, 7004, 40779, 24154, 11733, 40775, 43300 ] }
49,796
The efficacy of this picture was best proven on the intended target audience, namely teens. My 14-year-old son became so engrossed in this film that I rate it considerably higher than its imitator "Mad City." It sparked debate in our household on issues such as peer pressure and loyalty vs. doing the right thing. For that alone, I rate this film a 10! Parents should watch it with their teens and discuss it afterwards.<br /><br />I very much liked the smart dialogue and consistent acting. I thought that James Remar was adequate in his role, but the teenage cast really carried this picture. Other IMDB users have praised Corey Feldman's performance, which truly is inspired. All in all, I give this picture my highest recommendation. Go get this one!
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.432022
11.351139
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.32705127793475364, 0.3358954443879649, 0.3468758840967989, 0.34992395031488344, 0.3544085614255257, 0.3592037923355905, 0.3627321293530965, 0.36647628105743146, 0.3669174455137616, 0.36750598830270187, 0.369369304672046, 0.3702100135251363, 0.3781165621056142, 0.37860114843953163 ], "ids": [ 49797, 49800, 23998, 38211, 19788, 49802, 17220, 45177, 49798, 16029, 38673, 44671, 39511, 19794, 22150 ] }
49,797
This film was so well-paced that I don't think I actually blinked while watching. One intense situation after another kept me glued to the set. However, I would have liked to have seen Corey Feldman a lot more in this picture. He just steals every scene that he is in. This could be my favorite grown up Corey performance. The ending was clever and unlike other films which back away from severing body parts of likeable supporting characters, this film goes for it! I liked that it was not graphic blood and gore but left more to the viewer's imagination. Bravo. I literally had to wipe sweat from my forehead during this particular torture scene with a paper cutter. Ultimately, the film works because of its likeable lead character and the awesome presence of my all-time favorite bad guy, James Remar(48 Hours, remember?) I strongly recommend this film for anyone looking to break a sweat.<br /><br />
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-1.262335
12.549641
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.3360732694217773, 0.3473172150182582, 0.3499504046666876, 0.3612210542914168, 0.36647628105743146, 0.37693881235414817, 0.3780401721711746, 0.3868386342788813, 0.3897803748135359, 0.39185230244281877, 0.39660686029998415, 0.3967095842183844, 0.39878513426031337, 0.4014304209109517 ], "ids": [ 49798, 45344, 49802, 49800, 27104, 49797, 20500, 17755, 4323, 11188, 3994, 27469, 19920, 21838, 25422 ] }
49,798
I recently rented this video after seeing "Final Ascent" by the same writer. I wasn't prepared for how intense this film would get. I found it engaging from start to finish, and was rooting for the teenagers to get away with their attempted crime. The ending was definitely disturbing with some of its implied violence, but well-done. I highly recommend this picture.
1
test
stanfordnlp/imdb
-0.920346
11.651761
{ "distances": [ 0, 0.35884165314835625, 0.38133759417116875, 0.38474235548242675, 0.3848709633999412, 0.385992549078782, 0.39059951291216455, 0.3972369123107772, 0.39798570432785685, 0.39846035028433, 0.4024021298214526, 0.4094933212884738, 0.40984369972023194, 0.41291316021344016, 0.4147523958009611 ], "ids": [ 49799, 39664, 22187, 48412, 5368, 5120, 1929, 44684, 929, 41010, 706, 45760, 20500, 9464, 12569 ] }
49,799