Datasets:
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
task_categories:
- text-generation
dataset_info:
features:
- name: path
sequence: int64
- name: edge_list
sequence:
sequence: int64
- name: source
dtype: int64
- name: goal
dtype: int64
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 15200000
num_examples: 50000
- name: validation
num_bytes: 30400
num_examples: 100
- name: test
num_bytes: 1520000
num_examples: 5000
download_size: 1165940
dataset_size: 16750400
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
- split: validation
path: data/validation-*
- split: test
path: data/test-*
tags:
- synthetic
Insertion Language Models Dataset
Synthetic data for the paper [2505.05755] Insertion Language Models: Sequence Generation with Arbitrary-Position Insertions.
Abstract
Autoregressive models (ARMs), which predict subsequent tokens one-by-one ``from left to right,'' have achieved significant success across a wide range of sequence generation tasks. However, they struggle to accurately represent sequences that require satisfying sophisticated constraints or whose sequential dependencies are better addressed by out-of-order generation. Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) address some of these limitations, but the process of unmasking multiple tokens simultaneously in MDMs can introduce incoherences, and MDMs cannot handle arbitrary infilling constraints when the number of tokens to be filled in is not known in advance. In this work, we introduce Insertion Language Models (ILMs), which learn to insert tokens at arbitrary positions in a sequence -- that is, they select jointly both the position and the vocabulary element to be inserted. By inserting tokens one at a time, ILMs can represent strong dependencies between tokens, and their ability to generate sequences in arbitrary order allows them to accurately model sequences where token dependencies do not follow a left-to-right sequential structure. To train ILMs, we propose a tailored network parameterization and use a simple denoising objective. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that ILMs outperform both ARMs and MDMs on common planning tasks. Furthermore, we show that ILMs outperform MDMs and perform on par with ARMs in an unconditional text generation task while offering greater flexibility than MDMs in arbitrary-length text infilling. The code is available at: this https URL .
Project Page
https://dhruveshp.com/projects/ilm
Code
The code for the paper is available at: https://github.com/dhruvdcoder/ILM