rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
602,236,766
|
== wikipedia fuckhead == A-holes of the labour market R Skilled group
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
602,248,171
|
:::::::::::: The illusion of western objectivity is just that. Corporate controlled mainstream media is just as bad. At least RT is upfront about what they do.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,250,443
|
I'll just answer the initial question. you are trusted to use your discretion to decide whether a particular edit has consensus or not, but should exercise extreme caution when it is your own edits are called into question. You are welcome to make a change to a template without discussion if you believe that it will be uncontroversial. But you should then self-revert if that change is opposed, and not make the edit again until it is clear that consensus supports it. I will now pop along to the template talk page, to see if I can offer any suggestions. Regards, — Martin ( ·
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,260,559
|
== Episode 4 == Can someone please make the Challenge in Episode 4 a little more interesting instead of boring!?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,293,468
|
` ::``No evidence that this image has the approval of the person depicted.`` (from the latter). ::I see what you mean now, and will be a little more careful next time I see them editing. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,300,976
|
` ping `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,305,907
|
FUCK YOU KANSAS BİTCH
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
602,315,951
|
Hey, if anyone wanna drive me home, the password is: password
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
602,316,843
|
` : Yeah, unfortunately they came back with a vengeance. I didn't want to spend more time explaining that BLP/N is not dispute resolution, but oh well. There's a thread there, hopefully there will be some consensus. I'll give them that one revert for the time being. § `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,324,583
|
` *Oppose considering several articles use the term ``Chetco,`` disambiguation is helpful in this case is, especially considering that this is not a particularly well known group of Tolowa. Removing the disambiguation does not improve anything. - Uyvsdi`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,326,633
|
`::::::::::::Well, one might have said something like, ``Along with other echolocating bats (linked to the article on the appropriate taxon that shares this characteristic), Natterer's bat emits ...``. There is a way to be precise about such things, and I don't think the quest for precision is idle. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,328,213
|
` ==Testing the waters on Blood Knights== I've been doing articles on XBLA games for several years now, and I've been getting better it over time. I've recently brought Blood Knights up to GA level, and it's the first article I've done that I feel might been a viable candidate for Featured Article. Before I move forward with that, however, I wanted to ask you and a few other people that are involved in video game FACs what their thoughts are on the matter. In short, does the article have a realistic chance of going through FAC successfully? How much work would it take to be at that level? Your thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,341,072
|
==Comment== I am sorry, but I didn't have enough time to create the page, and my computer crashed. Sorry, .
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,345,083
|
::: this 21 year old user seems to have some delusion that you care?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,361,423
|
` == Riverview, Ottawa == I had a feeling you'd revert me today, though not on this page. I will deal with them in the order I saw them. 1. Lycée Claudel: You are 100% correct. I realized it five minutes later, when comparing the Elections Canada map of Ottawa South to those of Capital Ward and Alta Vista Ward. Good revert. 2. Chinese (Cantonese, Mandarin, etc.): What exactly *is* ``etc.``? You give no references whatsoever, and your use of the phrase ``sole mother tongue`` is confusing. Do you mean ``language that this person first learned at home in childhood and still understands``? Listing the top 2 Chinese topolects by name while the rest have to settle for ``etc.`` is imprecise, and doesn't do nearly as much for the reader as would a simple link to Varieties of Chinese. That said, I will concede that ``Chinese (not otherwise specified)`` correlates to only one bit of your 4%. If you're being reasonable, you will concede that with no refs, nobody can reasonably check. So...let's call that one a good revert to a bad version. Let's see some refs! `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,372,146
|
(UTC) | result = redirect to Mississauga | page = St. Jude's Academy
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,397,749
|
:::reunify: to bring together again (something, esp a country, previously divided) :::I really don't see any argument here. There is no point of view that Crimea was never part of Russia, and there is no point of view that Russia has not annexed Crimea, whether or not one wants to recognize it. Occupation and reunification are not mutually exclusive; they can occur at the same time.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,402,848
|
`:So you have no reason for how Othello is relevant at hand, huh? You continuing to ignore the editorial at hand, huh? You don't think I'm a good-faith editor, huh? Even though I've made tons of edits that been included into this article I'm still not ``good-faith`` enough for you, huh? Oh, by the way, if you have a problem with me editing WP because of something that you believe happened in the past, take it to the correct noticeboard, don't continue to make the same trite comment. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,416,494
|
== Soccer is only required to be used once per article == As per the 'consensus' on terminology, all single topic articles related to the sport of football are only required to have the word 'soccer' in the title (if necessary) and in the first paragraph (barring references to the archaic term being used for old organisations eg Soccer Australia). All further examples of the name of the sport after this first usage are to be 'football'. I have subsequently started on replacing obsolete terminology (after the single required usage in the first paragraph) where I found it in various articles.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,425,331
|
Are you joking? Denying that one is canvasing when one is in the actual act of canvasing does not in any way negate the fact that canvasing is taking place. You should remove your comments from this talk page as your presence here is a violation of WP:Canvass.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,429,765
|
` :::::::“``argument by argument`` (tm)”? If you have to invent a fallacy then even you have to know that you’re grasping for straws. :::::::Collect, we do not have to say “the world is regarded as being round by some members of the scientific community” any more than we have to say “water has never definitively been proven to be wet”. While I would personally prefer that we said something like “Ham’s claims have been disproven by modern science” (because I think it sounds more authoritative), if it’s between “incorrect” or nothing then “incorrect” is clearly the superior choice because it is factually true. :::::::And please don’t try that “all the intelligent readers already know he’s wrong so there’s no need to point out that he’s wrong” argument. Every fringe-pusher and their uncle has already tried that tactic and it’s bullshit. We can’t just allow Wikipedia to be full of rubbish and assume that the smart readers will filter the fact from the fiction. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,435,403
|
, saying “I’m doing this for your own good” does not negate the act of drunkenly abusing one’s children. Similarly, declaring that you are not canvasing when that is precisely what you are doing does not in any way change the act that was performed. The FACT of the matter is that you induced to come here and participate in your straw poll. Had you summoned Collect when no poll was taking place then your act would be less suspicious, but the summoning of allies to influence a polling action is precisely the sort of activity that WP:canvass prohibits. Frankly, your canvassing is so overt that I’m surprised that you’d bother to deny it.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,439,994
|
== Dialect of English? == A good section of this article is written in UK English; it also contains US English. It should standardize/standardise on one dialect only.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,458,942
|
Demands that all new adherents be baptized or re-baptized #
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
602,459,167
|
Actually, someone did suggest that I was canvasing [], and I responded to their allegation here []. That I was not sanctioned or reprimanded for canvassing should indicate to you that what I did was not considered to be canvasing. However, getting one of your buddies to aid you in a straw poll is a very different story. You seem to have formed the bizarre opinion that you can engage in canvasing so long as you include a ridiculous disclaimer like “I'm not looking to prompt you to go over there and involve yourself (that would be canvassing on my part)”. Surely you must see the overwhelming hypocrisy of what you’re doing. If I had gone over to and said “hey goblin, could you give me some “advice” about a straw poll *wink wink nudge nudge*” then you would be outraged that I had tried to circumvent the rules of Wikipedia. However, you’re perfectly willing to attempt to circumvent the rules yourself. You must be able to see that WP:CANVASS is utterly without effect if editors can simply circumvent the rule by adding a disclaimer to their attempts to canvass.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,476,526
|
Do you FART????????????????????????????????????????????????? I JUST DID YOURE AN IDIOT
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
602,477,286
|
IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT/////IDIOT///// GHATS WHAT YOU ARE
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
602,478,311
|
Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////Small penis/////. Oh, You don't have one
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
602,481,121
|
` == Fuck you, asshole == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | Fuck you, asshole |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Motherfucker! |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
602,482,208
|
I'll risk it. Does your citation demonstrate that seahorse actually cures something or does your citation demonstrate that seahorse has been claimed as a cure for something?
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
602,482,560
|
So, if I were to run rampant throughout Wikipedia asking all the “skeptical” editors for their “opinion” about this straw poll, you would think that it was perfectly fine for me to reap the benefit of any “happy accidents” that might result?
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,500,593
|
:Ah, now it's rated as missing any reliable sources. Thanks WP:BIO; not sure of the contribution except getting edit counts up.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
602,508,306
|
== Blocking Wiki Stalkers? == Is there a way to block wiki stalkers? Goldberg is funny, because she has no eyebrows. How often do you use wikipedia? Seriously, that post was more intelligent than 90% of the things posted here, and you do nothing about those. Posting bullying comments on my page and deleting content I posted can be construed as vandalism and stalking. Wiki moderators can block people who do that. Cheers.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,512,822
|
::Just because one article does it (incorrectly), doesn't mean they all can.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,526,850
|
::Seems unnecessary. We should start a discussion on merging them.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,527,412
|
This is seriously starting to smell of sockpuppets.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,558,766
|
== Vacuum_Insulated_Evaporator == Hello, How would I go about seeking permission to use your image of the Vacuum Insulated Evaporator my an online e-course I am developing on medical gases please? Thank you, Rachelle
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,574,363
|
` == I...Butter is ``a butter substitute`` == The references given (see discussion on this above) on this are improperly given. What is given appears to be little more than a google screen scrape. I managed to find both references and they do not support this usage. The use in these publications is not to define but to indicate the broad category. Peanut butter (if placed in the category of a 'nut butter') is also in the category if 'butter substitute' but it is not a type of margarine, which is what this product is. Possibly it might be helpful to say that the product is commonly used to substitute butter but it doesn't help in the basic definiton. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,578,595
|
== Strengthening to separability ⇔ countable basis? == From article: :Theorem. Any separable inner product space has an orthonormal basis. Can this be strengthened? For Hilbert spaces the following is true: :Theorem. A Hilbert space is separable if and only if has a countable orthonormal basis.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,590,485
|
== Stop, drop, and roll == Hi NothingButTruthIndia, looking over your contributions, as well as your username, you seem to be here to right great wrongs. Maintaining a neutral point of view on Wikipedia is important, but the way you have gone about your edits amounts to tendentious editing: every single one of them seems to be related to painting Somnath Bharti in a more positive light. When one has strong opinions about a specific subject, it's generally a good idea to leave it alone on Wikipedia. Therefor, it is probably the best idea if you leave the article on Bharti, and any subject closely related to him, alone. Regards,
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,597,549
|
: I agree mostly. But we need a page where something about Tatars in general is written; OK, not this much and detailed. Just the name of the Tatar group can be given (as a list) and explained in 1-2 sentences and then the link to the specified article. Or in the Languages sector which languages exist can be shown and, if there is one, the link of the appropriate article can be added. No need to add all the info that exists here under each section. I am for keeping (after slightly simplifying) History section. Traditional culture section is completely about Volga Tatars; no need to show it here, as the other Tatar groups don't share all of these. Bests,
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,598,934
|
::It doesn't seem to me that your Wikipedia history is a particularly good one. You own Wikipedia page shows evidence of potentially hundreds of agravated users. I think what you are trying to say is that in 8 years you have never been caught outright and had your account banned. I would say given your behaviour here and your past history shown by your own personal page is that it is likely is that you have border-line trolled for a number of years. But that is just to say that your history contradicts what you say. I've been quite clear about this right at the start, and I've let you know as soon as I felt you were crossing the line. At this stage I warned you and pointed you to wikepedia guideline on trolling.[] The specific policy you may be in breach of is vandalism.[]. ::I am alleging that your behaviour amounts to trolling. You are threatening in effect to vandalize my work. What you are trying to do is in effect bully me to change my work to fit your personal POV. That is plainly a breach of Wikipedia policy and guidelines. If you think I'm somehow getting it wrong and your behaviour is perfectly innocent then by all means go to those sources you yourself suggest. If you come back with a clean bill of health then I am prepared to revise my view. If you get a reliable source to review your posts here and they give their expert view that I am wrong, then I'm quite happy to remove the allegation. ::With respect to the citations, I am the author and so if you are unhappy with the sources I've used and having brought it to my attention but failing to find agreement after having discussed the matter it is up to you to consult a reliable source who is prepared to support your position something I've suggested now a number of times. Otherwise we will keep the article as it is. Particularly as it has been alleged that you are trolling, an allegation which it appears you do not dispute (discussing a variety of 'possiblities' does not actually address the allegation). Particularly, its important that you refrain from making any changes until the allegation has been cleared up. If you don't I intend to follow the Wikipedia guidelines on how to deal with vandalism caused by trolls.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,599,343
|
:I am not sure that we need Kanata, a suburb of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. when Kanata, Ontario, Canada is perfectly clear, the first thing the Kanata article tell us is where it is if you really want to know but for an airline article we can keep it simple.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,600,001
|
A good first step is of course to answer the allegation, which I note you have failed to do even after repeatedly being given the opportunity to do so. It is
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,608,352
|
` == Hazara people == Why the ``related ethnic groups`` parameter is removed from Hazara people article? They are related to other Iranic peoples, specifically other Persian-speaking groups like Central Asian Persians (Tajiks) and Iranian Persians. I know this parameter caused a heat on some articles, but it's good to provide more details than removing a parameter. Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. Regards. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,624,821
|
I was almost considering nominating it for deletion.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,637,379
|
vandalism caused by trolls.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,638,506
|
::::Please don't edit text that is not your own without consent. This means it has to be reverted back, and anything you have contributed might go as well. I note particularly your attempt to delete the allegation of trolling. If you believe it is a 'personal attack' or you think the allegation is wrong, the right thing to do is to follow the procedure you've set out above.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,641,065
|
:Please stop changing the contribution of other users. You are not an administrator, you don't have the authority to block anyone from editing, and you don't have any authority to issue 'warnings'. What you are doing amounts to trolling. Please stop it! Its fine if you put your many and varied opinions in the talk page but don't vandalize what other users have to say. Wikipedia guidelines suggest that vandalism is reverted. If you delete or modify the contribution of others on the talk page the page will have to be reverted from that point. So please just don't do it!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,641,350
|
Also don't put in any 'official' logos that make it appear as if you have any admin authority. I will remove such logos, particularly from my own talk page!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,643,207
|
REDIRECT Talk:The Idler (1758–60)
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
602,649,462
|
::::If you believe something to be a personal attack, by all means bring it to my attention. If I agree then I will be happy to remove it. If you get it reviewed by an authoritative source then I'm happy to abide by their judgement. But when you present your personal opinion without any sound basis then I am not persuaded, and we will have to agree to differ. If you persist to push your own personal POV after you've made your case and failed to persuade then that amounts to trolling. If you wish to apply for a block, that is a matter for you. In effect what you are asking is for an expert to review the matter and give their view. They will see your conduct on the I...Butter talk page and see that it led to my allegation of trolling. That's why its important the allegation is set out there. Its not intended as a personal attack, its simply a logical consequence of your conduct. For my part I feel we are at the informal stage, where you are skirting at the borderline of outright misconduct. I've set out the allegation of what I think you are doing wrong, and you've had the opportunity to reply. You haven't disputed the allegation and I've warned you to stop doing it. You responded by attempting to delete the allegation and failing that applying to have my account blocked. Perhaps to you this makes sense. To my mind you take care and due consideration in moving from the informal dispute resolution stage to making a complaint more formally. However, having done this, I would now ask you to leave this matter alone until the matter is adjudicated. Please don't edit or otherwise change the I..Butter article or talk page until that time.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,650,341
|
Well, considering the fact that the Waffen-SS was a great most multi-ethnic organization, and that Germany had some Jewish soldiers and officers, I, also, would like to have someone confirm this.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,651,943
|
, 3 April 2014 (UTC) :An allegation of misconduct is quite a different thing to an 'attack'. If you feel you have been misidentified as a troll then the guidelines on trolling tell you exactly what you should do, and also what you should not do. You constantly refer to various guidelines but I see no evidence that you've read and follow the guidelines yourself. As to 'good faith', I think the length of the discussion on the I...Butter talk page attests to that. Through this detailed discussion you've demonstrated step by step that you were not acting in good faith. I think most people reading through that discussion would reach the same conclusion. 23:30
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,657,593
|
` == Actually... == they should be alphabetical -) `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,660,782
|
, all visible on the one screen
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,671,888
|
` == Neighbor (or neighbour) either one ;-) == > 'Now which of these three do you think seemed to be a neighbour to him who fell among the robbers?`` > He said, ``He who showed mercy on him.`` This passage seems to suggest the Samaritan was the neighbor while the other two were not. The sentence ``love thy neighbor as thyself`` seems then to imply he (the victim of robbers) need only love the Samaritan and not the other 2, and similarly, since they were not the the victim's neighbor, did not have to love the victim. Then we are to love only those people who are neighbors to us (I don't mean physical neighbors), not everyone? Although true it does not say ``do not love those who are not your neighbors`` but it doesn't say to love them either.`
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,712,911
|
`Not notable as an article in itself because the vehicle had already existed a long time before its most recent ``inventor`` gave it this name. See eg Horse powered car c 1983: http://youtube.com/watch?v=jyYUPv0rx0I also `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,742,697
|
:And, I have archived some of my conversations but have tried something different! Hoped you guys might have noticed that.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,743,308
|
I totally agree with Local hero . In addition , Skanderbeg is the (only ) national hero of Albania ... and maybe the most important figure in Albania s history . I will also point out , that thats an odd rationale, very odd indeed . Please do not remove established material without consensus .
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,748,538
|
==Individual faculty accomplishments == Our practice is only to include those faculty with articles in WP, or obviously qualified to one.I have removed the entire section, as nobody here seemed to be in that category. ''''''
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,749,190
|
I am not connected in any way to the block.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,755,474
|
`== ``Padlock`` == Here is my question: Who put the padlock on this site censoring the input from recognized scientists in favor of mediocre graduate students? F. Winterberg Professor of physics. : ``Wikipedia policies and guidelines are developed by the community`` and conflicts are resolved by consensus. Original research fails our policy of providing only content supported by reliable sources. ``Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought``. : P.S.: WP:INDENT and WP:TOPPOST I reverted your last edit for the same reason as the one before. Provide sources that pass WP:RS, otherwise all you do is waste everyone's time. :: Hi Mr. Pardoctor, what kind of nonsense are you advocating! According to Wikipedia policy my paper is a second source cited in the widely discussed paper by Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski, Sully and Stanford, which is a first source. What better consensus and reliable first source can there be? F. Winterberg, Professor of Physics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,768,189
|
` ::::::::Huffington Post seems perfectly reliable. Am sure there are plenty of others. Besides, its all over YouTube. Maybe it's the actual TV show that's the problem! But since when have ``gay publications`` not been treated as WP:RS? `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,769,288
|
Supersymmetry has been gaining traction for 30 years with 30 0000 publications but it is not even wrong: It is groupthink like a church community with not a single evidence. The deleting my paper quoted by leading scientists,not the 30 000 adherents of SUSY authors of course, is not science but religion in the guise of science. Mr. gaijin42 don't be a coward and reveal your real name so everybody can check what your contributions to science are.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,824,028
|
` (UTC) And what would you say otherwise? He hates ``gays``? He is anti-gay in the same way that southern whites were anti-black in 1900... it's really pretty simple... He is probably one of the most bigoted people currently in politics. Actually, the first thing that ought to be done to unbias the article and make it encyclopaedic is to have the name of the article reflecting his formal name. This should be not a campaign advertisement which it currently is. That goes for any politician that is listed in an encyclopaedia by their ``buddy name``. Jim is his ``election name``, I take it? Is it the name his handlers have given him to personalize him? It was what they do in the state of New York... 05:47, 5 April 2014`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,826,834
|
` ==Why is this Article entitled 'Chuck Schumer' instead of Charles Schumer?== Why is this article entitled by a personalized campaign name? ``Chuck`` was always known as Charles for most of his political career until his handlers decided to personalize it. Why is an encyclopedia using a nickname for a significant person? Do we title the article on Albert Einstein, Albie Einstein? What smallbrain contributors have restyled Wikipedia to be a campaign launch pad for politicians reelection campaigns. This is not the only politician in Wikipedia that has been rewritten and designed by the politician's employees. There is no reason for Wikipedia to lower its already low standards to accommodate campaign strategies, is there? `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,830,045
|
:: Why are you calling Huggle a bot? WP:Huggle is an anti-vandal program used by users with WP:Rollback in order to remove vandalism. I personally used Huggle to give you this warning and revert your edit, and I can assure you that I am not a bot, and I see nothing to indicate that this user is a bot, as unofficial bots are not accepted on Wikipedia and all bots require admin approval, and all bots must have an emergency shutdown button on the main userpage of the bot, of which this user has neither, nor any edits indicating this user is botting.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,830,960
|
REDIRECT Talk:Broadband remote access server
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,834,950
|
David Berenbaum - Writer of Elf (2003). Could be added under Notable Alumni
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,858,962
|
Thanks for paying heed. Actually I was not able to do further research on this topic. In my view if it would be deleted then it is better. Afterwards i can write the article again.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
602,859,131
|
== Your reverting of changes to the 'Patterned media' article == Hi Flat Out, I notice you have reverted the two changes I've made to the Patterned media article. Could you explain why you've done this? The existing page is not well organised and contains out of date information. The changes I made were referenced, using information from recent publications in this area. I was going to make further changes to better describe the proposed fabrication processes for patterned media (the current information is taken from one scientific study, and does not represent the techniques that industry are developed for mass production). Thanks.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,887,145
|
Edit warring? You started it, not me. Don't try to blame something on me something that you started. Plus no, he is not German. There are no such thing as black Germans.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,893,906
|
== Hey you bitch == Don't undo my edit for no reason. Now piss off
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
602,894,327
|
== I HATE YOUR GUTS == Lol )
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
602,900,018
|
` :I've removed it.— Online `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
602,902,657
|
== Pray tell, what do you consider to be a WP:RS??? == You removed an article (Luiza Savage) from the former Category: Harvard alumni and Category: Yale alumni due to lack of reliable sources, despite the fact that I ref'd the most widely circulated news magazine in Canada. Being a socialist means I don't put much faith in old-guard media, but I'd have thought the Canadian equivalent of Newsweek would suffice for Wikipedia purposes! All of this is moot now though, as your edit is now buried beneath several others, thus precluding a simple reversion. Incorrect edits and deletions by bots will tend to discourage new, inexperienced and/or otherwise less-engaged Wikipedians like myself from contributing. This being the case, perhaps you would consider a 30 day buffer period before bot-editing articles. The worst part of this is that the target of your deletion was utterly uncontroversial, and didn't violate WP:BLP in letter or spirit. Frustrating! One last thing: The only people on Earth with access to the Harvard alumni list (the lone source that's MORE reliable) are...Harvard alumni! I don't count myself among their number. If you do, feel free to provide refs!
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,917,081
|
` :That's still wrong. Nobody knows who Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta is other than her mother, and Lady Gaga is the name her famous so that is appropriate, as is Madonna's since virtually no one would know her by her real name. However, in the case of real people and not stagenames, it seems inappropriate, certainly illiterate and uneducated to title an article by his nickname, especially when he is not generally known by that name. It is the same thing for New York U.S. Senator, ``Chuck Schumer`` which is purely his advertising name, promoted by his marketing staff, since his name that he was known entirely by for most of his political career, and until very recently, was ``Charles``. However, to humanize him, as ``Jim`` Inhofe's staff has done with him for marketing purposes, rather than James for which the other 49 states and the international population know him as, is both misleading and essentially promoting informalism as an accepted format for an encyclopaedia. And informalism ought to be attributed to poor scholarship and simple, less educated work - not an excuse for poor workmanship... `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,920,262
|
== vandalism == You undid my edit but I do not understand why, i did nothing wrong? I write correct info.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,923,429
|
U HAVE AN ISSUE WITH ME BAN ME OR DO ONE
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
602,923,741
|
== Editing talk pages == In the nicest and politest way possible, I would appreciate it if you did not edit my talk page and I wont edit yours. If you don't want me here then ban my IP address otherwise, please stop reverting your changes on my talkpage. Thanks.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,923,984
|
I want my page staying clean - if you dont like that, then ban me.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,940,273
|
` == Edit request to MOS standard == WP:EUPHEMISM states: ``The word died is neutral and accurate; avoid euphemisms such as passed away.`` The Critical reception section on this article reads: ``The Jungle Book received an outpouring of positive reviews upon release, undoubtedly influenced by a nostalgic reaction to the passing of Disney``. The wording needs be changed to read ``the death of Disney`` in accordance with MOS standards, as passing does sound silly. `
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,941,069
|
for all practical purposes
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,943,976
|
== Doctor Edna == Doctor Edna is watching you.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,944,318
|
== Doctor Edna == Is watching you.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
602,949,091
|
== Dr. Edna == Will rise again.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,951,029
|
:Okay. Thanks anyway.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,977,622
|
:According to Pritchard's encyclopedias there is a 3-player circular chess variant by that name invented in 1981 by Steve Preston. Each player has the usual 8 pieces, but 16 pawns. (Is that the one? If so, it is not yet mentioned at article Three-player chess, but could easily be.)
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
602,977,921
|
YOu may be able to be constructive, as you were before at Lillooet and elsewhere, here and here and, well, since it's a done deal but unclosed, here. This also remains unclosed despite ample evidence of PRIMARYTOPIC.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
602,996,860
|
` == Should there be a ``omnirumour`` paragraph? == Considering the massive coverage this has gotten in both Who-fansites and also in British media (such as the Mirror and Bleeding Cool), I think it would be appropriate that this article had a paragraph in regards to the ``omnirumour``. Suggested title: ``Rumoured mass recovery`` - and it should cover the whole TIEA affair, how rumors began to appear in 2011 and escalated until the 2013 announcement, and have continued escalating since with several sources reporting that all or near-all episodes have been recovered, and how it, amongst other things, have gathered nearly 100 000 forum posts in the ``missing episodes thread`` on Gallifrey Base, the biggest Who-forum online. :No, see above and Talk:Doctor Who#New Missing Episodes found rumours. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
603,078,028
|
::I thought it was chiroquacks that accused him of libel. There isn't a jot of evidence it was homeopaths. -
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
603,086,491
|
== Your questions on the Science ref desk == Your questions about urban search and rescue, etc. on the Science ref desk beg this question: Are you a disaster novelist, like me?
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
603,088,732
|
:No, you're not. You're trying to give your personal opinions the weight of policy, but you're accidentally falling foul of WP:No legal threats. Please stop. – ⋅
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
603,093,455
|
== Address == Isn't the address given in the article the Blessed Trinity Catholic School address?
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
603,095,688
|
filmmaker]], or a disaster
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
603,105,035
|
== Why do you suck so much cock? == I'd like to know. The answer is probably just that you're a flaming homo.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| true
|
603,112,215
|
` == Barnstar == {| style=``border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;`` |rowspan=``2`` valign=``top`` | |rowspan=``2`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;`` | The Civility Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;`` | For your extraordinary patience and unfailing civility at Talk:Muhammad/images, you are hereby awarded a green pointy thing with a cup in front. |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
603,142,645
|
==Image== Hi, the image is promotional put out by the company and is about the article, therefore, can be used. It is not easily replaced.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
603,145,050
|
let me make it clear: if you again add a false claim to the article, I am no longer willing to check each single claim for correctness but I will revert all. You did wast too much time already!
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.