dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
604,712,419	==Merge discussion for Kyabje Kalu Rinpoche== An article that you have been involved in editing, Kyabje Kalu Rinpoche, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ( \| )	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
604,713,732	Mr.Kumar rao! Thank you for your support about Rajus article,i have seen your message in my talk page.All the Best. -abcde	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
604,741,397	::Oppose - I am for Kosovska Mitrovica	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
604,742,759	== Plot Re-write == This plot summary is so full of typo's and errors that it's hard to read. Someone with time and who's seen the movie should re-write.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
604,759,898	` ==Sockpuppet investigation== `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
604,764,338	== Am I the only one who does not understand benefits in honey vs. highly toxic sap? == It is explained in detail that the sap is extremely detrimental to human health, causing severe problems, and at the same time purportedly it is still very much appreciated by beekepers in France? Does that mean that the compound that permeates the whole plant (sap) and is toxic in small quantities is somehow completely absent from the flower? And if so, how is that possible? Or do the bees decompose the chemical during the honey production? Then it should be explained.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
604,773,633	::End of problem I think.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
604,787,935	any animal from earth, its	2,014	false	article	random	train	false
604,807,950	April 2014 (UTC) :::: So, in other words, it makes no difference at all? 23:20, 18	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
604,811,685	` ::I only tried to put an end to your persistant edit warring - in which I was not involved. I have not edited this article for months - but I was watching. If you want to turn this article to an article that lists the cuisines of geographical Europe, I propose the deletion of this article, i.e. to merge this article with the List of European cuisines article - as this article already exists.Originally this article was supposed to concentrate on European cuisine, as ``Western Cuisine``; i.e. resemble articles like Western literature, European literature, European painting, Western classical music, etc. Are you planning to rewrite these articles as well? `	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
604,812,623	REDIRECT Talk:Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
604,847,604	:The OED defines occiput, n. as: 1. The back or posterior part of the head; 2: The occipital bone of the skull. Its Etymology: classical Latin, occiput: back of the head.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
604,854,866	` == ``primary school in history and secondary school in archaeology``? == What is a primary school in history and secondary school in archaeology? Or what exactly is ``he finished primary and secondary school, in history and archaeology`` supposed to mean? `	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
604,855,302	== Poor English and moreover poor ANY language: unclear == This is so short and so full of mistakes that it is rather hard to follow. Does he have one thesis in law or two theses? Why would anyone have two theses in the same field? Why is there insistence on this (location of MA thesis in law, location of PhD thesis in law) when he is mostly known as a historian? Are there ISBN and links to those for his books? This article needs serious reworking.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
604,860,061	` ::I totally disagree: firstly, I don't need to discuss my edits more than the other contributors, specially those who revert them many times. Secondly, this is not an ``edit war``, just an attempt to protect my edits from silly changes. Thirdly, there's no point at all here to discuss such trivial changes. Fourthly, whoever you are (administrator or not), I get this ``you-could-be-blocked`` warning as a threat... `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
604,887,344	:::I have no problem with putting it under a neutral header, unless of course there is reliable sourcing out there that refers to these as controversies or some synonym thereof. I have to say, I find it hard to believe that they haven't been classed as controversies! But for the time being, let's let it stay at this for now.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
604,900,892	:Since no supporting evidence has turned up, I've removed the sentence in question.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
604,903,556	== Proposed deletion of Resul Dindar == Hello, Anton.aldemir. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Resul Dindar, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Resul Dindar to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on . Thanks,	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
604,930,742	== Misquoting source == Stavrides quite explicitly explains that Mahmud Pasha was not a Croat in any sense other than political using the South Slavic ambiguity in defining Serbs and Croats for personal diplomatic purposes. He lists quite in detail reasons why the subject was a Serb-Greek. Why is the preposterous and insane idea of Mahmud Pasha's quasi-croatness being pushed forth by misquoting sources?	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
604,936,538	:Right, now bugger off, buggery bugger.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	true
604,936,711	== You bitch == Ha ha ha. )	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
604,943,479	:::::Let's not get confused. I have a personal copy of de Boor's book and have strictly followed the conventions in it. The degree of the polynomial is k. This is clearly stated in the Definitions section and this convention is followed throughout this article.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
604,950,733	I will think about it. Please geive me some times. Let me think about new page or old page is good.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
604,961,003	` Your comment, ``SYNTHESIS, OR``, what are you attempting to say? Did you go to the TORAY website and find the tensile strength of the T1000GB fibers? Do you need an explanation of the units?`	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
604,961,514	== Information about the death of Henry Maksoud == Henry Maksoud died of cardiac arrest on April 17, 2014, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. He was 85 years old.	2,014	false	article	random	dev	false
604,971,275	` ==Modification of Info box== :Rajus belong to Hinduism & vaishnava sect according to Thurston and many other sources above said that. :They are a forward caste according to overseas development institute which is stated in srinivasulu. :Populated states & Languages is according to anthropolgical sources of Kumar Suresh Singh.Even Thurston never said that Rajus are confined only to Andhra Pradesh. ``Gotras``: coming to gotras that Joshua Jonathan said they are acceptable in his examination.So,it will be better that if he only adds them in this page than any other person. These modifications doesn't damage the neutrality as the same justice should be done to this infobox which was done to kapu,kamma & reddy info boxes.Please kindly understand and don't revert them by stating any unjustifiable reasons.Because as the editor always say other stuff exists & no dead line.I hope editors understand. -abcde `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
604,972,803	` _______________________________________________________________________ I have no problem with the Boeing report, but its conclusion is for tether lengths that are much longer than the ones that are being discussed in this article. This is where your lack of knowledge about engineering is a problem. The mass of a space tether goes up with length. Assuming it could take the thermal environment, you can build a space tether out of kite string. But there is a limit on how long this space tether could be made based on the strength to weight ratio of the string. This is where designers start making tapered lines that have more cross sectional area in the middle than at the ends. Even with this there are still limits on the length based on cost and total mass. You can make an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator using kite string but it will be larger than the Earth, hence not practical. That doesn't mean that you still can't use that kite string to fly a kite, obviously you can. The difference is in the length. The space elevator is 100,000 km long. Your kite string is only a few hundred feet at most. The same applies to skyhooks. You could build a 100,000 km long space elevator out of T1000GB carbon fibers but it would have near planetary mass and as a result isn't practical. But like the much shorter kite string for flying a kite, a skyhook made of carbon fibers in the 200 km to 4,000 km range is possible. As to the references not all being open source on the internet there is not much I can do about that. You will need to either pay for them or go to a university library that pays for access to them and have them downloaded. References 7, 18, and 19 are open source. Reference 19 is only for the part of that paper that covers non-rotating skyhooks and does not include the entire paper. If you want to see the entire paper do a search using the title on google, it is open source. Quite simply the information is out there but you will have to do a little digging or pay for it. You will also need a basic understanding of engineering and orbital mechanics in regards to space tethers. For that I recommend the ``Tether in Space Handbook``, it is also open source on the internet, see reference 7. You could also just read the abstracts for the non-open source papers and you will get an idea that this is a workable concept. Or you could just notice who is writing these reports; NASA, reference 19, Lockheed Martin, references 5, 8, 9, and 10, and Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, reference 7. Do you really think these organizations would be wasting their time and money on a lie? To conclude with the Boeing report. The Boeing report says 1) ``His analysis showed that because a hanging tether must be tapered to support its lower end in the gravitational field of the Earth, achieving a HyperSkyhook tether tip rendezvous with a 5.0 km/s (16 kft/s or Mach 16) airplane would require a HyperSkyhook tether mass of 25 times the payload mass.`` 5.0 km/s is 64% of low Earth orbit velocity. A tether mass of 25 times payload mass can be built. I have no argument with this. 2) ``Trying to lower the tether tip speed to 4.0 km/s (13 kft/s or Mach 13) would require a HyperSkyhook tether mass greater than 200 times the payload mass.`` 4.0 km/s is 51% of low Earth orbit velocity. A tether mass of 200 times payload mass sounds about right and it is highly unlikely that such a tether length would be economic. Again no disagreement. The tether tip speeds for the non-rotating skyhook examples in this article, and in all the references I have listed, start at 96% of low Earth orbit velocity and go to approximately 70% of low Earth orbit velocity. There is no reason to go any lower. As a result, the final line of the Boeing quote, ``In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts. `` does not apply for two reasons. 1) It doesn't apply to the skyhook lengths in the article, and 2) it is an unfounded over generalization that falls under the category of sales BS that is promoting rotating skyhooks. Do you now understand how the Boeing quote that you are so fond of does not apply to the non-rotating skyhooks in this article? PS The reference numbers are for the article as I have written it. Since you keep deleting references with your changes, the reference numbers keep changing, hence you will need to use the article as I have written it if you want the reference numbers quoted here to mean anything. So please, read this until you understand it and do your research to confirm what I and many others are saying. If you run into any problems that you cannot resolve easily, write me here and I will do what I can to assist you.`	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
604,973,267	She did it to me. How come you are not warning and blocking her?	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
604,991,870	` That's why I'm said ``I will think about it. Please geive me some times.`` Don't you understand me? And what do you mean ``Clearly you like the old one better.``? That's totally wrong. Do not think you can read my mind. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,015,895	*No problem, looks like there are better sources now. Thanks!	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
605,017,210	:I took a pause, now I'm active again )	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
605,021,576	::::::So, the format is not a problem, and it's not a primary source. And nobody doubts the authority of Department of Health (UK) and Cancer Research UK, right? So, there is no reason left for keeping this particular source out of the article??	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
605,034,662	` == Sympathies == Man does all this sound way too familiar; no matter what you say, the ``walls of text`` rant gets fielded and more anti-AGF and direct NPAs are made by those accusing you of same..... there seems to be no cure for this kind of thing; they are relentlessly narrow-minded and judgmental/condemnatory and any avenue of recourse is similarly skewed by the cesspit of negativity that is the wikipedia ``backroom``; and apparently designed that way.....as is the apparent immunity of admins to abuse and distort guidelines as they please....we're not alone, that's for sure; how many hours/days of what could be productive work on the encyclopedia itself are being wasted by such gamesmanship huh? `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
605,038,226	` What links here stats ``Tewa people`` has c.125 incoming links, including via the Tewa redirect page which has 16 incoming links ``Tewa language`` has 64 incoming links **how to google to find ``Tewa`` uses about the people separately from results about the language, like other titles of this kind, is tricky but I'll give it a try later. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
605,049,173	::Florian, Pyramidology is a specific brand of idiocy which encompasses the outrageous claims made about pyramids. We cannot simply apply the “Pyramidology” label to all ancient Egypt-related stupidity because doing so would be original research.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
605,054,190	` :::So you haven't done your homework, you refuse to read or listen to the answers to your questions and then you delete the references that have them. You are quite a piece of work. What happened to freedom of speech and free open honest discussion where people can be swayed by reasoned thought? I am curious what all the other wiki editors who have been following this think. Of course it will be difficult for them to research the sources you have removed and now locked out. How about that. Suggestion: if you were really as honest as you like to think you are, you would put both articles on the page for everyone to read and vote on. Yours as it now is, and mine as I last left it. It says in the instruction to new editors to assume good faith. That has not been my experience of you, and from my point of view, you have now demonstrated that beyond any doubt. There are other issues here. Everywhere I look in wikipedia I see poorly written, out of date articles, or articles with messages requesting that someone update them. I am curious how many others have had similar experiences to what I have had here and who have lost interest and moved on? Does anyone keep track of wikipedia's hit count and how it has changed over the years? Or the number of active wiki editors? I wouldn't be surprised one little bit to find out it both have leveled out and gone into decline. If so, has it occurred to you that that might be a signal of some sort? This issue also points out another major flaw in wikipedia; the fact that a single admitted non-expert in a field of study can override multiple experts from NASA, Lockheed Martin, JPL, etc., on a topic as you have done here. You have some serious issues here. I will be interested in seeing how you resolve them, assuming that you can. Or will this article remain as it now is, another stone in the constipated belly of wikipedia, for years to come? I just had an idea. I am going to put the article as I last left it right here so that the other wiki editors who have been following this can read and compare without editorials from either of us. It will be interesting to see if you have the courage to leave it alone and allow others to form their own opinion and do their own research. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ A skyhook is a proposed space transportation concept that aims to reduce the cost of placing payloads into space. Skyhooks are often confused with an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator, but they are different. A skyhook is much shorter than a space elevator and does not reach down to the surface of the Earth. A skyhook requires a suborbital launch vehicle to get to the bottom end of the skyhook, a space elevator does not. Due to the much shorter length of the skyhook and the resulting reduction in strain, skyhooks up to 4,000 km in length can be built with existing materials, while an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator cannot.Amanda S. Wu, Tsu-Wei Chou, ``Carbon Nanotube Fibers for Advanced Composites``, Materials Today, vol. 15, July–August 2012, pp. 302-310 The advantage of a skyhook it that the lower end of the cable is moving at less than orbital velocity for its altitude. As a result, a launch vehicle flying to the bottom of the skyhook can carry a larger payload than it could going directly to orbit on its own. When the cable is long enough, single stage to skyhook flight with a reusable launch vehicle such as a spaceplane becomes possible. Reusability of the launch vehicle and an enlarged payload fraction makes for much lower launch costs. Once the cable has become long enough the skyhook becomes cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator (assuming a space elevator can ever be built), and the skyhook can be built.{{cite jour	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
605,069,007	There are many references on wikipedia that are to documents that are not open source and they are accepted, why not these? And even though they are not open source, the first page of those references are available at the supplied links so that you can get an idea of what they say and what they are about.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
605,070,453	Another thought, if wikipedia really is consensus based, then unlock the article, stop with your heavy handed editing and distortions to the truth, and let the article evolve on its own without your ignorance based opinions.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
605,076,118	` == Links to web pages containing copyright violations == Please do not add external links to web pages hosting copyright violations, as you did to Jimi Hendrix. The site you linked is not authorized or licensed to provide access to copyrighted concert footage. If you have added such links elsewhere, please remove them. Thanks! :Which ``access to copyrighted concert footage`` are you talking about?!? There's no such thing anywhere in this web site http://hendrix.free.fr/concerts/concerts.htm !?! `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
605,076,212	::Another reference noting that many Iranian Americans are irreligious has been added.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,078,252	== Issue == Is there a particular reason why the Queen's children are referred to by the legal term issue, rather than children in this article?	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
605,079,854	::::You're right, but it does note the non-religious, as do the following links. Do you have any sources that could help contribute? :::::http://www.jewishjournal.com/iranianamericanjews/item/video_persian_new_year_unites_folks_of_different_religions_together :::::http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=236855 :::::http://www.iasaz.org/ :::::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IAmericanreligions.png :::::http://www.niacouncil.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Resources_iranian_american_scholarships :::::http://iaca-seattle.org/	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,084,680	:::::::Well then let's look at some possible solutions. How could it be rephrased to support both sides of the spectrum?	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,085,081	== Reference improvement == There are only four sources in this article containing such information on this song. A ref improve tag was added by me because of it, and it was later removed, claiming that it was not needed and the problem didn't exist. What is the point of deleting a ref improve tags when an article has only four sources?	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
605,086,427	` ==Proposed Controversy Section== 1, I requested administrator assistance because of user mongo's unrelenting deletion of anything I post, including a NPOV Template at the top of the article...he removed it within minutes...the template states it should not be removed until the issues are discussed and resolved. 2, I'm simply proposing a Controversy Section, or any separate section, with the following. Outside Magazine revealed Kellogg used the ``powerful steroid dexamethasone`` for an Everest speedclimb attempt.http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/Climbings-Little-Helper.html The above 'powerful steroid dexamethasone' is in the subtitle of the article, and the paragraph on Kellogg is about 30 paragraphs from the top. 3, I'm open to different wording. 4, Mongo objected to this with various personal objections about the climber. Mongo did not propose other wording, or any other alternative. Instead he deleted it within minutes, and did not suggest discussing it, nor would tolerate any discussion. Isn't this a violation of wikipedia conduct? 5, Fact: National media Outside Magazine did an article on the matter, it's a critical article, and the journalist did a paragraph on Kellogg's use of the prescription drug on Everest. I will try to find other mention of Kellogg's use of the drug...there is mention of it at his sponsor's blog Outdoor Research. 6, Administrator, could you inquire into whether other moderators etc are joining together to control the information in the article? 7, Could you ask for a third party to take part? `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,092,206	` :::::::::Ok, I've changed it to ``Many Iranian-Americans are irreligious, agnostic and atheist, but also of Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Baha'i and Zoroastrian religious backgrounds.`` `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
605,093,607	**Comment Unusual settlement/town names in British Columbia are not rare; have a look here at WP:CANLIST which is the current listing of all unique-placenames without comma-province dabs.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
605,097,061	:A line of reasoning which sets aside guidelines (Self-identification, including not using derogatory exonyms) and POLICY (TITLE/CONCISION/PRECISENESS) is highly unreasonable and very illogical and clearly biased - and is a demonstration of your inability to decide anything rationally when your personal bias against the nominator is so clearly on display.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,097,914	`::::::: I will not file an RM here yet (being tired and bored of discussions where the same pack of obstinate naysayers pop in with irrational claims), but the reality of this term's negative and derogatory origins was noted by John Swanton, quoted here on the Canadian genealogy website in his article on this people - ``From the Siksika (Blackfoot) words sa arsi, ``not good.`` Somewhere else on the same or similar site I found a more explicit statement that this name is considered derisive/derogatory, I'll return with it once I find it. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
605,099,733	` :I just want to work on improving and creating articles etc. Yes, defending myself is a laborious activity, but to hear exaggerations and hypocrisy thrown at me in an effort to demonize me for expulsion ``to protect the encyclopedia`` is hard to stay away from; the overall nature of said activity is WP:BAITing and things like the CfD and the hostile RM closures is AGF/NPA in the extreme; who should 'take a break' is the chorus/cadre whose primary activity on Wikipedia seems to be attacking contributing editors by any specious and POV/AGF rationale available; I know I'm not alone in being attacked and vilified this way; and yes, there's far more productive things to be doing than arguing with people who only want to argue. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
605,101,308	:::Assumptions of bad faith are not assumptions when there's a pointless and groundless CfD launched at me, and RMs closed with me as the closer's rationale; never mind all the stupid things being said and alleged the ANI (which I'm de-watchlisting; anything I say there gets little respect anyway and defending yourself is a stroke against you, in the previous ANI I was directly told to shut up and that I had no right to speak there).	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,101,426	` ::::and re ``assuming bad faith from everyone around'' is not factual; there are many people who treat me and what I have to say, and the real wiki-work I do, with respect and GF...``everyone`` is hyperbole and untrue. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,103,773	` *The following is what is currently written in the religion section, which I am fine with. I've combined two of the paragraphs because they have to do with one poll: :: Iranians of all religious backgrounds in the United States have comparatively a mix of liberal, conservative and nationalist political leaning and opinions. Iranian-Americans thus are largely secular and tend to practice moderate, less traditional religious forms, but have strong cultural traditions. According to a 2012 Zogby-PAAIA poll, most Iranian-Americans appear not to practice any particular religion at all, showing many to be irreligious, agnostic and atheist. The poll found the remaining balance split among Muslims, Christians, followers of Judaism, Baha'is and Zoroastrians, with the results as follows: Muslim: 31%, ``No response``: 15%, Atheist/Realist/Humanist: 11%, Agnostic: 8%, (Irreligious: 34%), Baha’i: 7%, Jewish: 5%, Protestant: 5%, Roman Catholic: 2%, Zoroastrian: 2%, and ``Other``: 15%. ``There are religious and ethnolinguistic differences among the Muslim, Jewish, Baha'i, Zoroastrian, Christian, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Kurdish, and Assyrian groups``.Nilou Mostofi, Who We Are: The Perplexity of Iranian-American Identity, The Sociological Quarterly (published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Midwest Sociological Society), Vol. 44, No. 4 (Autumn, 2003), pp. 681–703, p. 685 Calculating the percentage of Christian Iranian-Americans is difficult because most Iranian Christians are of Armenian or Assyrian origin and self-identify as such rather than as Iranian. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
605,104,536	` ==Please take a break== I have been reading this snafu. You are doing yourself no favors; please take a break. :I just want to work on improving and creating articles etc. Yes, defending myself is a laborious activity, but to hear exaggerations and hypocrisy thrown at me in an effort to demonize me for expulsion ``to protect the encyclopedia`` is hard to stay away from; the overall nature of said activity is WP:BAITing and things like the CfD and the hostile RM closures is AGF/NPA in the extreme; who should 'take a break' is the chorus/cadre whose primary activity on Wikipedia seems to be attacking contributing editors by any specious and POV/AGF rationale available; I know I'm not alone in being attacked and vilified this way; and yes, there's far more productive things to be doing than arguing with people who only want to argue. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
605,117,764	::Discussion has also been continued .	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
605,122,680	Feel free to change it back if you wish, I just thought the section emphasizes their irreligion more than their religion.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,130,217	: I replaced it with Collateral (finance). ( )	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,135,817	` ::You've got to be kidding me. You accuse me of personal attackes when accountless User:172.56.11.26 has now ``suddenly taken an inteterest in articles I was editing``, why is that ? Because they want to harrass me and they have also personally attacked me by making remarks on the Gary Gabelich talk page about the ancestry of the man (I am Yugoslav as is Gabelich). This user who is now personally attacked me via stalking of articles I edited is now using racism to get back at me. A Biographical article is not only about one acheivement, but ones whole life and that includes ancestry. That abusive user 172.56.11.26 is going to sabotage that article to get back at me, and you're protecting him. he accused me of ``vandalism`` when all I did was make the article conform to Biographical standards and moreover to back me up a higher level editor reverted his reversion of my sensible edit. So who is the real vandal ? - Another contention that I ran into was some want to promote Gary's parents ethnicity above his LSR. He is famous as a world record breaker and not for his ethnicity which likely would of been of little concern in the SOCAL American drag scene of the 1960's. It is included under his personal life. Much information about his family was also added. 172.56.11.26 (talk) If that's not a personal attack against me disguised as a legitimate edit I dont know what is. PLease delete my account, I am dont with you nasty, dispicable people `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
605,140,128	if you check all the talk pages you'll see USer:172.56.11.26 has gone all out to only attack and criticize my recetn work exclusively, how do you interpret that ?	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,157,512	== re citing this == I had a look at this google search, which is for this name, excluding wikipedia, and including the provincial government domain gov.bc.ca and found quite a bit. So it's citable; I'll add the cite from sandspit.bc.ca for now; more history of the camp and its operations and population might be found in the Forests Ministry citations and others that may be in the 122 results of the search.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,159,264	==One question== Why is specific fuel consumption double at altitude, when compared to take/off	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
605,176,252	== sources (notes for later) == recent reviews general, process http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23197823 CV: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24113326 cornea: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725602 orthopedic http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598176 wound healing http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23586040 orthodontics http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23522126 CNS/movement disorders http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23296342 CNS/spine http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23114605 CSN/neurodegeneration: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806879 (looks a bit fishy); http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24737939 horses (?) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23081833	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
605,177,295	== Cedar Keys == I was definitely wrong about this being a misspelling. However, it seems to be an old name for the current city: Do you have more information about this? Did the plural town cover more area than the singular city?	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
605,188,554	` == ``Arab`` Philosopher? == Okay, I deleted the mention of him being an ``Arab`` philosopher. Although many of his works were in Arabic he also wore a turban, I understand this but his works in Arabic were in Judeo-Arabic first off which was written in the Hebrew script not Arabic script, second of all in NONE of those have I ever heard him mention himself as ``Arab`` or a ``Arab Jew`` though again, it is understood that there are many Arabs or Jews who call themselves Arab Jew but Maimonides was not one of them. The only encyclopedia to ever call Maimonides an ``Arab``. Where is the sources that say he was an Arab? PacificWarrior101`	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,197,306	At the top of the article, it clearly states this: For the song by Stephen Duffy, see Kiss Me (Tin Tin song).	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,203,591	Why I think it should not be moved back is because those who searched the article before I moved it may have gotten mixed up with the Tin Tin song and the Sixpence None the Richer song of the same name and may not read what is on the top of this song's article, and may wanted it to be moved beforehand.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
605,208,766	You're at it again, Epeefleche, with your continual deletions here.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,210,147	I've notified you again on .	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
605,210,340	::Got it, thanks. Yeah, I don't think it's notable enough either.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
605,213,554	April 2014 (UTC) :::::: I follow Wikipedia policies, not what ´´people´´ want. 22:29, 21	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,227,944	` Can I just say thank you to the wikipedia editor who put the link in for ``Getaltzerfall``? Literally the first thing I did after hearing that in the episode is come here for that, cheers.`	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
605,229,082	Someone mess up one of my pages on my wiki, this could happen again. I don't want to wait six months, unblock me. I have to protect my pages on my wiki I can't do that if I am blocked.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
605,229,966	` LOL. votes in support of my position from people who know the material are ``unhelpful commentary?? LOL you people are a piece of work. And yes ``you people`` applies. As for the supposed ``personal attack``, I pointed out a direct falsehood in one or the nom's posts; and it is a falsehood. Perhaps, given AGF, a mistake from not actually looking at or understanding the categories in those listings (perhaps BHG thought Alaska was part of Canada?? - a common mistake, in fact), but still FALSE*. Claims of OR about well known regions and completely citable mountain ranges (which have fixed boundaries and are not subject to change) are mere hand-waving without evidence; the use of NPA to ``go after`` people who point out mistakes/distortions and ``bad actions`` is not what that guideline is intended for; ``contrary to the spirit of the guidelines``. And Ottawahitech is quite right, and I've said the same thing in the ANI myself - that NPAs and outright AGFs - including the premise of this CfD - are committed against me all the time; touting Wikiquette while flouting it openly. Stalking me in the wake of her peremptory block is not just AGF, and as noted by someone in the ANI, shoudl be grounds for an interaction ban. It's not me who won't collaborate; it's people who don't do their research but still want to have not just an opinion not based in facts, but wave in the direction of conventions that don't formally exist. BHG has waved her hand at guidelines like SOURCES (in one of ``hostile`` RM closures, which they so clearly are given they go against the grain of similar closures and both existing and emergent consensus), claiming they say things they don't actually say; her statement here that you claim is a ``personal attack`` is what it is; not researched, not acccurate, and like so much else of her nomination completely misleading and without any knowledge of the places in question. The adminship protects its own from examination, and does nothing when they violate the very rules they invoke; persecution of contributing editors and dicking around challenging titles and the like, by people who have no knowledge of the subject matter, THAT is what's driving them from Wikipedia. That includes many BC Wikipedians who were around when these categories were created and took part in what debates there were; to a British Columbian, they're obvious. But to someone from WikiLandia, armed with guidelines they don't accurately cite or, I think, even really understand, they're ``original research``......and yet they have nothing viable to replace them with, and sure as shootin' aren't the types who will undertake to apply whatever other system they come up with; and doing so would involve original research. Another acronym got tossed out above; does anyone talk in plain English anymore?? `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,230,696	` *Further comment. Shutting me out of the CfD during one of its last days falls in the ``unfair`` category, especially given that it was clearly AGF in motivation to start with, despite all claims of UNINVOLVED and innocence, this is politics, and ``in politics optics is everything`` and BHG's hostility towards - and contempt for - me is a well-established fact. This is in the same kind of procedural irregularity as the RMs she closed during the block she imposed. Have you people no shame?. I know you don't have self-critical examination skills, that's for sure....or you'd see the bizarrenessx of your action, and recognize that the CfD itself was an NPA. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
605,231,182	` What's ``spiralling out of control`` is the abusiveness of admins and the group-hysteria of tongue-clucking and hypocritical use of NPA and AGF to discredit their latest victim; I started work on articles and categories in my main area of contribution, and found the same admin who blocked me launching a CfD that has no basis in guidelines or fact, making mistaken/false claims and labelling evidence and cites provided as ``irrelevant``. something's very wrong in Wikiland when that is tolerated, very, very, very wrong. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,231,624	Freeing myself from bothering with being on the dinner menu at ANI, this is what I did yesterday, created and cited articles, and was going to do more today......halting contributions and calling for more procedural discussions is all about not being collaborative in the slightest. If the people opposing this CfD would put some work in filling in the redlinks of List of British Columbia rivers and citing/researching them, they might have a better leg to stand on but they'd also educate themselves about the topic; instead of trying to throw everything out as OR simply because they know nothing about the subject.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,232,315	` *RE WP:AIR Funny you should invoke that to force a one-month hiatus; I refer to ``There are no rules`` (the FIFTHPILLAR) all the time; it appears that guideline, like others, can be used to obstruct contributing editors and defray discussions to no great end; instead of doing that to the CfD, why don't you read the geography lessons contained in my posts and start thinking with more than a Wikipedian admin's narrow field of wiki-view? The evidence supporting all these articles and titles is all over the actual physical map and the history of British Columbia and is part of the vernacular of the place (COMMONNAME). Try reading about it before you hastily close the CfD without really understanding the subjects it's about... `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
605,240,845	` ==Category:Pulitzer Prize for Public Service winners== Please, with respect to that portion of your 19 November 2013 edit reading ``These people may be considered winners of the prize…,`` how did you determine that they may be considered winners of a prize awarded to organizations not to individuals? Thank you. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
605,245,978	`You may want to remove the ``tick`` above. I have removed the Montenegrin National Army from the infobox as it is not clear that he actually took up that command. The details of the agreement are not known (according to Tomasevich, the source in the article), so while there may have been a safe-conduct agreement that included a provision that Djurisic would take up the role, the article says he did not in fact follow the agreement, cross the river and join Drljevic, but instead tried to outsmart Drljevic and the NDH forces by keeping his fighting forces south of the river. Given that a few weeks later, Drljevic was apparently involved in setting a trap for Djurisic and some of Djurisic's forces deserted to Drljevic, they could hardly have been operating any sort of unified command as envisaged in the agreement. I see that there are other sources (not used in this article) you have used for the Montenegrin National Army article. Do any of them shed any further light on the date the agreement was signed, or what Djurisic did following the signing of the agreement? I am keen to resolve this issue one way or the other. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
605,250,793	== Coat of Arms?? == I think the coat of arms is wrong. Why does it have the UK's cost of arms?	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
605,289,916	` ==Pyjamas== The spelling of ``pyjamas`` is not 'British' English. It is the spelling most widely used globally. See: :Australia :France :India :Ireland :New Zealand :Nigeria :*Thailand .`	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
605,296,655	== You added unverified claims to the cdrtools article == Hi, you recently added at least one unverified claim to the cdrtools article when you removed a hint that mentions that libburnia cannot edit images with UDF support. Please either add a verification that libburnia fully supports editing filesystem images even when they include UDF enhancements (needed for DVDs and BluRay disks) or remove the claim you made.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,298,601	` ::A false claim that is created by ``just`` removing important information is still a false claim. UDF is part if the DVD and BD standard but unsupported by libburnia. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,300,649	=='s continual removal of content from Srđa Popović== I noticed you warned about being blocked over this, and since it doesn't seem to have stopped him something has to be done about this. It's been going on for months now.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
605,308,921	::'Sick Nazi ideology' is the subject of academic historiography. Obnoxious NRA propaganda about it isn't. And if you want argue that me objecting to the violation of WP policies is a personal attack, go ahead - but watch out for the boomerang. And as for the RfC, given that it entirely fails to offer the sole policy-compliant option at all, it is clearly invalid from the start.	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
605,315,846	` == another new ref == http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1018341/orion-media-utv-not-bid-gmg-radio Orion Media and UTV did not bid for GMG Radio by Maisie McCabe, 26.07.2010 Phil Riley, chief executive of Midlands radio group Orion Media, has denied he made an offer for Guardian Media Group' radio assets, following weekend reports he had bid for the stations. Riley said:``It’s completely utterly wrong and absolutely not true. I speak to every person in radio every week, but I have not tabled an offer to GMG. That is categorically not true.`` The Sunday Telegraph reported that GMG had turned down offers for GMG Radio from Orion Media and UTV, the operator of the channel three licence in Northern Ireland, because they were too low. It is understood that UTV spoke to GMG’s new chief executive Andrew Miller to say that should GMG decide to dispose of GMG Radio, UTV could be interested in the business, but it did not make a formal offer either. A spokesman for GMG said: ``Our radio stations are attractive assets, so it is unsurprising that we receive expressions of interest from time to time. While we keep our portfolio under constant review, we are not seeking a buyer at this time.`` According to GMG’s annual report GMG Radio, which owns the Real Radio and Smooth Radio brands had a turnover of £50.1m in the year to the end of March 2010 and posted an operating profit before exceptional items and amortisation of intangibles of £0.6 million (up from a £6.6m loss in 2009). However, an impairment of £63.9m was made on the radio assets, reflecting the impact of the recession on growth projections in the short term. UTV declined to comment.`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
605,320,688	21:54, 15 April 2014‎	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
605,333,288	== uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh == fuck you	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
605,347,612	== Issues == There are several things wrong with the article, such as: It is incomplete. It does not contain enough information about the actress. It needs additional sources for verification The article's lead section is too short and does not adequately summarize the rest of it. Maybe you all can help solve all the issues and add more info about Boone (and please include sources).	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
605,347,937	::This is not a edit war, you are known Hungarian nationalist and was many times charged because of Nationalism and Vandalizm on WP.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,357,258	:I am impressed with the psychoanalytic detective work you have done going down the rabbit hole of my contribution history and perhaps flattered but I am afraid your conclusions are entirely erroneous, Paul... //	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,358,736	::I mean, if I had been going around to a bunch of evolution articles and making controversial edits this might make some sense but I have never done anything remotely like that at all... //	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
605,365,333	: Here you go, OP: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503(v=vs.85).aspx	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,370,010	` ::::Except that Microsoft has changed the user agent string for its browser significantly recently (as is indeed mentioned on that very page). If ``NT`` was no longer an actual designation, surely it would have been removed along with those changes? `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,378,703	` ::::::The so-called Wikipedia:Synthesis in this case is actually not that at all, as it merely concerns a refutation of your argument, and not anything actually written in this article. In any case, though, Microsoft states the following at the link I provided, something that sounds clear enough to me: ``Platform tokens describe your operating system.`` It seems to me that you should provide evidence (as opposed to similar synthesis-like arguments of your own) that Microsoft explicitly no longer considers NT to exist; failing that, the current wording of this article regarding this issue should remain. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
605,380,561	== Template:Workpage == What happened?	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,381,242	** Could you please explain why you think WP:T2 doesn't apply?	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,381,785	** Neither of the template speedy deletion criteria mention transclusion count as a valid reason for declining speedy deletion. I would appreciate it if you linked me to a policy that states this.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
605,381,847	== New article == Per our previous discussions on my talk page, check out: * List of food trucks Cheers,	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
605,411,172	:Not to worry my friend, there's no need to apologize. I appreciate the hard work you put in to make the image. I'll move it to the Bipolar disorder page soon. Thanks again!	2,014	true	user	random	train	false

604,712,419

==Merge discussion for Kyabje Kalu Rinpoche== An article that you have been involved in editing, Kyabje Kalu Rinpoche, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ( | )

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

604,713,732

Mr.Kumar rao! Thank you for your support about Rajus article,i have seen your message in my talk page.All the Best. -abcde

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

604,741,397

::Oppose - I am for Kosovska Mitrovica

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

604,742,759

== Plot Re-write == This plot summary is so full of typo's and errors that it's hard to read. Someone with time and who's seen the movie should re-write.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

604,759,898

` ==Sockpuppet investigation== `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

604,764,338

== Am I the only one who does not understand benefits in honey vs. highly toxic sap? == It is explained in detail that the sap is extremely detrimental to human health, causing severe problems, and at the same time purportedly it is still very much appreciated by beekepers in France? Does that mean that the compound that permeates the whole plant (sap) and is toxic in small quantities is somehow completely absent from the flower? And if so, how is that possible? Or do the bees decompose the chemical during the honey production? Then it should be explained.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

604,773,633

::End of problem I think.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

604,787,935

any animal from earth, its

2,014

false

article

random

train

false

604,807,950

April 2014 (UTC) :::: So, in other words, it makes no difference at all? 23:20, 18

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

604,811,685

` ::I only tried to put an end to your persistant edit warring - in which I was not involved. I have not edited this article for months - but I was watching. If you want to turn this article to an article that lists the cuisines of geographical Europe, I propose the deletion of this article, i.e. to merge this article with the List of European cuisines article - as this article already exists.Originally this article was supposed to concentrate on European cuisine, as ``Western Cuisine``; i.e. resemble articles like Western literature, European literature, European painting, Western classical music, etc. Are you planning to rewrite these articles as well? `

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

604,812,623

REDIRECT Talk:Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

604,847,604

:The OED defines occiput, n. as: 1. The back or posterior part of the head; 2: The occipital bone of the skull. Its Etymology: classical Latin, occiput: back of the head.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

604,854,866

` == ``primary school in history and secondary school in archaeology``? == What is a primary school in history and secondary school in archaeology? Or what exactly is ``he finished primary and secondary school, in history and archaeology`` supposed to mean? `

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

604,855,302

== Poor English and moreover poor ANY language: unclear == This is so short and so full of mistakes that it is rather hard to follow. Does he have one thesis in law or two theses? Why would anyone have two theses in the same field? Why is there insistence on this (location of MA thesis in law, location of PhD thesis in law) when he is mostly known as a historian? Are there ISBN and links to those for his books? This article needs serious reworking.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

604,860,061

` ::I totally disagree: firstly, I don't need to discuss my edits more than the other contributors, specially those who revert them many times. Secondly, this is not an ``edit war``, just an attempt to protect my edits from silly changes. Thirdly, there's no point at all here to discuss such trivial changes. Fourthly, whoever you are (administrator or not), I get this ``you-could-be-blocked`` warning as a threat... `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

604,887,344

:::I have no problem with putting it under a neutral header, unless of course there is reliable sourcing out there that refers to these as controversies or some synonym thereof. I have to say, I find it hard to believe that they haven't been classed as controversies! But for the time being, let's let it stay at this for now.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

604,900,892

:Since no supporting evidence has turned up, I've removed the sentence in question.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

604,903,556

== Proposed deletion of Resul Dindar == Hello, Anton.aldemir. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Resul Dindar, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Resul Dindar to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on . Thanks,

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

604,930,742

== Misquoting source == Stavrides quite explicitly explains that Mahmud Pasha was not a Croat in any sense other than political using the South Slavic ambiguity in defining Serbs and Croats for personal diplomatic purposes. He lists quite in detail reasons why the subject was a Serb-Greek. Why is the preposterous and insane idea of Mahmud Pasha's quasi-croatness being pushed forth by misquoting sources?

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

604,936,538

:Right, now bugger off, buggery bugger.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

true

604,936,711

== You bitch == Ha ha ha. )

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

604,943,479

:::::Let's not get confused. I have a personal copy of de Boor's book and have strictly followed the conventions in it. The degree of the polynomial is k. This is clearly stated in the Definitions section and this convention is followed throughout this article.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

604,950,733

I will think about it. Please geive me some times. Let me think about new page or old page is good.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

604,961,003

` Your comment, ``SYNTHESIS, OR``, what are you attempting to say? Did you go to the TORAY website and find the tensile strength of the T1000GB fibers? Do you need an explanation of the units?`

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

604,961,514

== Information about the death of Henry Maksoud == Henry Maksoud died of cardiac arrest on April 17, 2014, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. He was 85 years old.

2,014

false

article

random

dev

false

604,971,275

` ==Modification of Info box== :Rajus belong to Hinduism & vaishnava sect according to Thurston and many other sources above said that. :They are a forward caste according to overseas development institute which is stated in srinivasulu. :Populated states & Languages is according to anthropolgical sources of Kumar Suresh Singh.Even Thurston never said that Rajus are confined only to Andhra Pradesh. ``Gotras``: coming to gotras that Joshua Jonathan said they are acceptable in his examination.So,it will be better that if he only adds them in this page than any other person. These modifications doesn't damage the neutrality as the same justice should be done to this infobox which was done to kapu,kamma & reddy info boxes.Please kindly understand and don't revert them by stating any unjustifiable reasons.Because as the editor always say other stuff exists & no dead line.I hope editors understand. -abcde `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

604,972,803

` _______________________________________________________________________ I have no problem with the Boeing report, but its conclusion is for tether lengths that are much longer than the ones that are being discussed in this article. This is where your lack of knowledge about engineering is a problem. The mass of a space tether goes up with length. Assuming it could take the thermal environment, you can build a space tether out of kite string. But there is a limit on how long this space tether could be made based on the strength to weight ratio of the string. This is where designers start making tapered lines that have more cross sectional area in the middle than at the ends. Even with this there are still limits on the length based on cost and total mass. You can make an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator using kite string but it will be larger than the Earth, hence not practical. That doesn't mean that you still can't use that kite string to fly a kite, obviously you can. The difference is in the length. The space elevator is 100,000 km long. Your kite string is only a few hundred feet at most. The same applies to skyhooks. You could build a 100,000 km long space elevator out of T1000GB carbon fibers but it would have near planetary mass and as a result isn't practical. But like the much shorter kite string for flying a kite, a skyhook made of carbon fibers in the 200 km to 4,000 km range is possible. As to the references not all being open source on the internet there is not much I can do about that. You will need to either pay for them or go to a university library that pays for access to them and have them downloaded. References 7, 18, and 19 are open source. Reference 19 is only for the part of that paper that covers non-rotating skyhooks and does not include the entire paper. If you want to see the entire paper do a search using the title on google, it is open source. Quite simply the information is out there but you will have to do a little digging or pay for it. You will also need a basic understanding of engineering and orbital mechanics in regards to space tethers. For that I recommend the ``Tether in Space Handbook``, it is also open source on the internet, see reference 7. You could also just read the abstracts for the non-open source papers and you will get an idea that this is a workable concept. Or you could just notice who is writing these reports; NASA, reference 19, Lockheed Martin, references 5, 8, 9, and 10, and Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, reference 7. Do you really think these organizations would be wasting their time and money on a lie? To conclude with the Boeing report. The Boeing report says 1) ``His analysis showed that because a hanging tether must be tapered to support its lower end in the gravitational field of the Earth, achieving a HyperSkyhook tether tip rendezvous with a 5.0 km/s (16 kft/s or Mach 16) airplane would require a HyperSkyhook tether mass of 25 times the payload mass.`` 5.0 km/s is 64% of low Earth orbit velocity. A tether mass of 25 times payload mass can be built. I have no argument with this. 2) ``Trying to lower the tether tip speed to 4.0 km/s (13 kft/s or Mach 13) would require a HyperSkyhook tether mass greater than 200 times the payload mass.`` 4.0 km/s is 51% of low Earth orbit velocity. A tether mass of 200 times payload mass sounds about right and it is highly unlikely that such a tether length would be economic. Again no disagreement. The tether tip speeds for the non-rotating skyhook examples in this article, and in all the references I have listed, start at 96% of low Earth orbit velocity and go to approximately 70% of low Earth orbit velocity. There is no reason to go any lower. As a result, the final line of the Boeing quote, ``In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts. `` does not apply for two reasons. 1) It doesn't apply to the skyhook lengths in the article, and 2) it is an unfounded over generalization that falls under the category of sales BS that is promoting rotating skyhooks. Do you now understand how the Boeing quote that you are so fond of does not apply to the non-rotating skyhooks in this article? PS The reference numbers are for the article as I have written it. Since you keep deleting references with your changes, the reference numbers keep changing, hence you will need to use the article as I have written it if you want the reference numbers quoted here to mean anything. So please, read this until you understand it and do your research to confirm what I and many others are saying. If you run into any problems that you cannot resolve easily, write me here and I will do what I can to assist you.`

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

604,973,267

She did it to me. How come you are not warning and blocking her?

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

604,991,870

` That's why I'm said ``I will think about it. Please geive me some times.`` Don't you understand me? And what do you mean ``Clearly you like the old one better.``? That's totally wrong. Do not think you can read my mind. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,015,895

*No problem, looks like there are better sources now. Thanks!

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

605,017,210

:I took a pause, now I'm active again )

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

605,021,576

::::::So, the format is not a problem, and it's not a primary source. And nobody doubts the authority of Department of Health (UK) and Cancer Research UK, right? So, there is no reason left for keeping this particular source out of the article??

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

605,034,662

` == Sympathies == Man does all this sound way too familiar; no matter what you say, the ``walls of text`` rant gets fielded and more anti-AGF and direct NPAs are made by those accusing you of same..... there seems to be no cure for this kind of thing; they are relentlessly narrow-minded and judgmental/condemnatory and any avenue of recourse is similarly skewed by the cesspit of negativity that is the wikipedia ``backroom``; and apparently designed that way.....as is the apparent immunity of admins to abuse and distort guidelines as they please....we're not alone, that's for sure; how many hours/days of what could be productive work on the encyclopedia itself are being wasted by such gamesmanship huh? `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

605,038,226

` *What links here stats **``Tewa people`` has c.125 incoming links, including via the Tewa redirect page which has 16 incoming links *``Tewa language`` has 64 incoming links **how to google to find ``Tewa`` uses about the people separately from results about the language, like other titles of this kind, is tricky but I'll give it a try later. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

605,049,173

::Florian, Pyramidology is a specific brand of idiocy which encompasses the outrageous claims made about pyramids. We cannot simply apply the “Pyramidology” label to all ancient Egypt-related stupidity because doing so would be original research.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

605,054,190

` :::So you haven't done your homework, you refuse to read or listen to the answers to your questions and then you delete the references that have them. You are quite a piece of work. What happened to freedom of speech and free open honest discussion where people can be swayed by reasoned thought? I am curious what all the other wiki editors who have been following this think. Of course it will be difficult for them to research the sources you have removed and now locked out. How about that. Suggestion: if you were really as honest as you like to think you are, you would put both articles on the page for everyone to read and vote on. Yours as it now is, and mine as I last left it. It says in the instruction to new editors to assume good faith. That has not been my experience of you, and from my point of view, you have now demonstrated that beyond any doubt. There are other issues here. Everywhere I look in wikipedia I see poorly written, out of date articles, or articles with messages requesting that someone update them. I am curious how many others have had similar experiences to what I have had here and who have lost interest and moved on? Does anyone keep track of wikipedia's hit count and how it has changed over the years? Or the number of active wiki editors? I wouldn't be surprised one little bit to find out it both have leveled out and gone into decline. If so, has it occurred to you that that might be a signal of some sort? This issue also points out another major flaw in wikipedia; the fact that a single admitted non-expert in a field of study can override multiple experts from NASA, Lockheed Martin, JPL, etc., on a topic as you have done here. You have some serious issues here. I will be interested in seeing how you resolve them, assuming that you can. Or will this article remain as it now is, another stone in the constipated belly of wikipedia, for years to come? I just had an idea. I am going to put the article as I last left it right here so that the other wiki editors who have been following this can read and compare without editorials from either of us. It will be interesting to see if you have the courage to leave it alone and allow others to form their own opinion and do their own research. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ A skyhook is a proposed space transportation concept that aims to reduce the cost of placing payloads into space. Skyhooks are often confused with an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator, but they are different. A skyhook is much shorter than a space elevator and does not reach down to the surface of the Earth. A skyhook requires a suborbital launch vehicle to get to the bottom end of the skyhook, a space elevator does not. Due to the much shorter length of the skyhook and the resulting reduction in strain, skyhooks up to 4,000 km in length can be built with existing materials, while an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator cannot.Amanda S. Wu, Tsu-Wei Chou, ``Carbon Nanotube Fibers for Advanced Composites``, Materials Today, vol. 15, July–August 2012, pp. 302-310 The advantage of a skyhook it that the lower end of the cable is moving at less than orbital velocity for its altitude. As a result, a launch vehicle flying to the bottom of the skyhook can carry a larger payload than it could going directly to orbit on its own. When the cable is long enough, single stage to skyhook flight with a reusable launch vehicle such as a spaceplane becomes possible. Reusability of the launch vehicle and an enlarged payload fraction makes for much lower launch costs. Once the cable has become long enough the skyhook becomes cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator (assuming a space elevator can ever be built), and the skyhook can be built.{{cite jour

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

605,069,007

There are many references on wikipedia that are to documents that are not open source and they are accepted, why not these? And even though they are not open source, the first page of those references are available at the supplied links so that you can get an idea of what they say and what they are about.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

605,070,453

Another thought, if wikipedia really is consensus based, then unlock the article, stop with your heavy handed editing and distortions to the truth, and let the article evolve on its own without your ignorance based opinions.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

605,076,118

` == Links to web pages containing copyright violations == Please do not add external links to web pages hosting copyright violations, as you did to Jimi Hendrix. The site you linked is not authorized or licensed to provide access to copyrighted concert footage. If you have added such links elsewhere, please remove them. Thanks! :Which ``access to copyrighted concert footage`` are you talking about?!? There's no such thing anywhere in this web site http://hendrix.free.fr/concerts/concerts.htm !?! `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

605,076,212

::Another reference noting that many Iranian Americans are irreligious has been added.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,078,252

== Issue == Is there a particular reason why the Queen's children are referred to by the legal term issue, rather than children in this article?

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

605,079,854

::::You're right, but it does note the non-religious, as do the following links. Do you have any sources that could help contribute? :::::http://www.jewishjournal.com/iranianamericanjews/item/video_persian_new_year_unites_folks_of_different_religions_together :::::http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=236855 :::::http://www.iasaz.org/ :::::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IAmericanreligions.png :::::http://www.niacouncil.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Resources_iranian_american_scholarships :::::http://iaca-seattle.org/

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,084,680

:::::::Well then let's look at some possible solutions. How could it be rephrased to support both sides of the spectrum?

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,085,081

== Reference improvement == There are only four sources in this article containing such information on this song. A ref improve tag was added by me because of it, and it was later removed, claiming that it was not needed and the problem didn't exist. What is the point of deleting a ref improve tags when an article has only four sources?

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

605,086,427

` ==Proposed Controversy Section== 1, I requested administrator assistance because of user mongo's unrelenting deletion of anything I post, including a NPOV Template at the top of the article...he removed it within minutes...the template states it should not be removed until the issues are discussed and resolved. 2, I'm simply proposing a Controversy Section, or any separate section, with the following. Outside Magazine revealed Kellogg used the ``powerful steroid dexamethasone`` for an Everest speedclimb attempt.http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/Climbings-Little-Helper.html The above 'powerful steroid dexamethasone' is in the subtitle of the article, and the paragraph on Kellogg is about 30 paragraphs from the top. 3, I'm open to different wording. 4, Mongo objected to this with various personal objections about the climber. Mongo did not propose other wording, or any other alternative. Instead he deleted it within minutes, and did not suggest discussing it, nor would tolerate any discussion. Isn't this a violation of wikipedia conduct? 5, Fact: National media Outside Magazine did an article on the matter, it's a critical article, and the journalist did a paragraph on Kellogg's use of the prescription drug on Everest. I will try to find other mention of Kellogg's use of the drug...there is mention of it at his sponsor's blog Outdoor Research. 6, Administrator, could you inquire into whether other moderators etc are joining together to control the information in the article? 7, Could you ask for a third party to take part? `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,092,206

` :::::::::Ok, I've changed it to ``Many Iranian-Americans are irreligious, agnostic and atheist, but also of Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Baha'i and Zoroastrian religious backgrounds.`` `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

605,093,607

**Comment Unusual settlement/town names in British Columbia are not rare; have a look here at WP:CANLIST which is the current listing of all unique-placenames without comma-province dabs.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

605,097,061

:A line of reasoning which sets aside guidelines (Self-identification, including not using derogatory exonyms) and POLICY (TITLE/CONCISION/PRECISENESS) is highly unreasonable and very illogical and clearly biased - and is a demonstration of your inability to decide anything rationally when your personal bias against the nominator is so clearly on display.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,097,914

`::::::: I will not file an RM here yet (being tired and bored of discussions where the same pack of obstinate naysayers pop in with irrational claims), but the reality of this term's negative and derogatory origins was noted by John Swanton, quoted here on the Canadian genealogy website in his article on this people - ``From the Siksika (Blackfoot) words sa arsi, ``not good.`` Somewhere else on the same or similar site I found a more explicit statement that this name is considered derisive/derogatory, I'll return with it once I find it. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

605,099,733

` :I just want to work on improving and creating articles etc. Yes, defending myself is a laborious activity, but to hear exaggerations and hypocrisy thrown at me in an effort to demonize me for expulsion ``to protect the encyclopedia`` is hard to stay away from; the overall nature of said activity is WP:BAITing and things like the CfD and the hostile RM closures is AGF/NPA in the extreme; who should 'take a break' is the chorus/cadre whose primary activity on Wikipedia seems to be attacking contributing editors by any specious and POV/AGF rationale available; I know I'm not alone in being attacked and vilified this way; and yes, there's far more productive things to be doing than arguing with people who only want to argue. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

605,101,308

:::Assumptions of bad faith are not assumptions when there's a pointless and groundless CfD launched at me, and RMs closed with me as the closer's rationale; never mind all the stupid things being said and alleged the ANI (which I'm de-watchlisting; anything I say there gets little respect anyway and defending yourself is a stroke against you, in the previous ANI I was directly told to shut up and that I had no right to speak there).

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,101,426

` ::::and re ``assuming bad faith from everyone around'' is not factual; there are many people who treat me and what I have to say, and the real wiki-work I do, with respect and GF...``everyone`` is hyperbole and untrue. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,103,773

` *The following is what is currently written in the religion section, which I am fine with. I've combined two of the paragraphs because they have to do with one poll: :: Iranians of all religious backgrounds in the United States have comparatively a mix of liberal, conservative and nationalist political leaning and opinions. Iranian-Americans thus are largely secular and tend to practice moderate, less traditional religious forms, but have strong cultural traditions. According to a 2012 Zogby-PAAIA poll, most Iranian-Americans appear not to practice any particular religion at all, showing many to be irreligious, agnostic and atheist. The poll found the remaining balance split among Muslims, Christians, followers of Judaism, Baha'is and Zoroastrians, with the results as follows: Muslim: 31%, ``No response``: 15%, Atheist/Realist/Humanist: 11%, Agnostic: 8%, (Irreligious: 34%), Baha’i: 7%, Jewish: 5%, Protestant: 5%, Roman Catholic: 2%, Zoroastrian: 2%, and ``Other``: 15%. ``There are religious and ethnolinguistic differences among the Muslim, Jewish, Baha'i, Zoroastrian, Christian, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Kurdish, and Assyrian groups``.Nilou Mostofi, Who We Are: The Perplexity of Iranian-American Identity, The Sociological Quarterly (published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Midwest Sociological Society), Vol. 44, No. 4 (Autumn, 2003), pp. 681–703, p. 685 Calculating the percentage of Christian Iranian-Americans is difficult because most Iranian Christians are of Armenian or Assyrian origin and self-identify as such rather than as Iranian. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

605,104,536

` ==Please take a break== I have been reading this snafu. You are doing yourself no favors; please take a break. :I just want to work on improving and creating articles etc. Yes, defending myself is a laborious activity, but to hear exaggerations and hypocrisy thrown at me in an effort to demonize me for expulsion ``to protect the encyclopedia`` is hard to stay away from; the overall nature of said activity is WP:BAITing and things like the CfD and the hostile RM closures is AGF/NPA in the extreme; who should 'take a break' is the chorus/cadre whose primary activity on Wikipedia seems to be attacking contributing editors by any specious and POV/AGF rationale available; I know I'm not alone in being attacked and vilified this way; and yes, there's far more productive things to be doing than arguing with people who only want to argue. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

605,117,764

::Discussion has also been continued .

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

605,122,680

Feel free to change it back if you wish, I just thought the section emphasizes their irreligion more than their religion.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,130,217

: I replaced it with Collateral (finance). ( )

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,135,817

` ::You've got to be kidding me. You accuse me of personal attackes when accountless User:172.56.11.26 has now ``suddenly taken an inteterest in articles I was editing``, why is that ? Because they want to harrass me and they have also personally attacked me by making remarks on the Gary Gabelich talk page about the ancestry of the man (I am Yugoslav as is Gabelich). This user who is now personally attacked me via stalking of articles I edited is now using racism to get back at me. A Biographical article is not only about one acheivement, but ones whole life and that includes ancestry. That abusive user 172.56.11.26 is going to sabotage that article to get back at me, and you're protecting him. he accused me of ``vandalism`` when all I did was make the article conform to Biographical standards and moreover to back me up a higher level editor reverted his reversion of my sensible edit. So who is the real vandal ? - Another contention that I ran into was some want to promote Gary's parents ethnicity above his LSR. He is famous as a world record breaker and not for his ethnicity which likely would of been of little concern in the SOCAL American drag scene of the 1960's. It is included under his personal life. Much information about his family was also added. 172.56.11.26 (talk) If that's not a personal attack against me disguised as a legitimate edit I dont know what is. PLease delete my account, I am dont with you nasty, dispicable people `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

605,140,128

if you check all the talk pages you'll see USer:172.56.11.26 has gone all out to only attack and criticize my recetn work exclusively, how do you interpret that ?

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,157,512

== re citing this == I had a look at this google search, which is for this name, excluding wikipedia, and including the provincial government domain gov.bc.ca and found quite a bit. So it's citable; I'll add the cite from sandspit.bc.ca for now; more history of the camp and its operations and population might be found in the Forests Ministry citations and others that may be in the 122 results of the search.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,159,264

==One question== Why is specific fuel consumption double at altitude, when compared to take/off

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

605,176,252

== sources (notes for later) == recent reviews *general, process http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23197823 *CV: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24113326 *cornea: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725602 *orthopedic http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598176 *wound healing http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23586040 *orthodontics http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23522126 *CNS/movement disorders http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23296342 *CNS/spine http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23114605 *CSN/neurodegeneration: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806879 (looks a bit fishy); http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24737939 *horses (?) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23081833

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

605,177,295

== Cedar Keys == I was definitely wrong about this being a misspelling. However, it seems to be an old name for the current city: Do you have more information about this? Did the plural town cover more area than the singular city?

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

605,188,554

` == ``Arab`` Philosopher? == Okay, I deleted the mention of him being an ``Arab`` philosopher. Although many of his works were in Arabic he also wore a turban, I understand this but his works in Arabic were in Judeo-Arabic first off which was written in the Hebrew script not Arabic script, second of all in NONE of those have I ever heard him mention himself as ``Arab`` or a ``Arab Jew`` though again, it is understood that there are many Arabs or Jews who call themselves Arab Jew but Maimonides was not one of them. The only encyclopedia to ever call Maimonides an ``Arab``. Where is the sources that say he was an Arab? PacificWarrior101`

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,197,306

At the top of the article, it clearly states this: For the song by Stephen Duffy, see Kiss Me (Tin Tin song).

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,203,591

Why I think it should not be moved back is because those who searched the article before I moved it may have gotten mixed up with the Tin Tin song and the Sixpence None the Richer song of the same name and may not read what is on the top of this song's article, and may wanted it to be moved beforehand.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

605,208,766

You're at it again, Epeefleche, with your continual deletions here.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,210,147

I've notified you again on .

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

605,210,340

::Got it, thanks. Yeah, I don't think it's notable enough either.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

605,213,554

April 2014 (UTC) :::::: I follow Wikipedia policies, not what ´´people´´ want. 22:29, 21

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,227,944

` Can I just say thank you to the wikipedia editor who put the link in for ``Getaltzerfall``? Literally the first thing I did after hearing that in the episode is come here for that, cheers.`

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

605,229,082

Someone mess up one of my pages on my wiki, this could happen again. I don't want to wait six months, unblock me. I have to protect my pages on my wiki I can't do that if I am blocked.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

605,229,966

` *LOL. votes in support of my position from people who know the material are ``unhelpful commentary?? LOL you people are a piece of work. And yes ``you people`` applies. As for the supposed ``personal attack``, I pointed out a direct falsehood in one or the nom's posts; and it is a falsehood. Perhaps, given AGF, a mistake from not actually looking at or understanding the categories in those listings (perhaps BHG thought Alaska was part of Canada?? - a common mistake, in fact), but still *FALSE*. Claims of OR about well known regions and completely citable mountain ranges (which have fixed boundaries and are not subject to change) are mere hand-waving without evidence; the use of NPA to ``go after`` people who point out mistakes/distortions and ``bad actions`` is not what that guideline is intended for; ``contrary to the spirit of the guidelines``. And Ottawahitech is quite right, and I've said the same thing in the ANI myself - that NPAs and outright AGFs - including the premise of this CfD - are committed against me all the time; touting Wikiquette while flouting it openly. Stalking me in the wake of her peremptory block is not just AGF, and as noted by someone in the ANI, shoudl be grounds for an interaction ban. It's not me who won't collaborate; it's people who don't do their research but still want to have not just an opinion not based in facts, but wave in the direction of conventions that don't formally exist. BHG has waved her hand at guidelines like SOURCES (in one of ``hostile`` RM closures, which they so clearly are given they go against the grain of similar closures and both existing and emergent consensus), claiming they say things they don't actually say; her statement here that you claim is a ``personal attack`` is what it is; not researched, not acccurate, and like so much else of her nomination completely misleading and without any knowledge of the places in question. The adminship protects its own from examination, and does nothing when they violate the very rules they invoke; persecution of contributing editors and dicking around challenging titles and the like, by people who have no knowledge of the subject matter, THAT is what's driving them from Wikipedia. That includes many BC Wikipedians who were around when these categories were created and took part in what debates there were; to a British Columbian, they're obvious. But to someone from WikiLandia, armed with guidelines they don't accurately cite or, I think, even really understand, they're ``original research``......and yet they have nothing viable to replace them with, and sure as shootin' aren't the types who will undertake to apply whatever other system they come up with; and doing so would involve original research. Another acronym got tossed out above; does anyone talk in plain English anymore?? `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,230,696

` *Further comment. Shutting me out of the CfD during one of its last days falls in the ``unfair`` category, especially given that it was clearly AGF in motivation to start with, despite all claims of UNINVOLVED and innocence, this is politics, and ``in politics optics is everything`` and BHG's hostility towards - and contempt for - me is a well-established fact. This is in the same kind of procedural irregularity as the RMs she closed during the block she imposed. Have you people no shame?. I know you don't have self-critical examination skills, that's for sure....or you'd see the bizarrenessx of your action, and recognize that the CfD itself was an NPA. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

605,231,182

` What's ``spiralling out of control`` is the abusiveness of admins and the group-hysteria of tongue-clucking and hypocritical use of NPA and AGF to discredit their latest victim; I started work on articles and categories in my main area of contribution, and found the same admin who blocked me launching a CfD that has no basis in guidelines or fact, making mistaken/false claims and labelling evidence and cites provided as ``irrelevant``. something's very wrong in Wikiland when that is tolerated, very, very, very wrong. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,231,624

Freeing myself from bothering with being on the dinner menu at ANI, this is what I did yesterday, created and cited articles, and was going to do more today......halting contributions and calling for more procedural discussions is all about not being collaborative in the slightest. If the people opposing this CfD would put some work in filling in the redlinks of List of British Columbia rivers and citing/researching them, they might have a better leg to stand on but they'd also educate themselves about the topic; instead of trying to throw everything out as OR simply because they know nothing about the subject.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,232,315

` *RE WP:AIR Funny you should invoke that to force a one-month hiatus; I refer to ``There are no rules`` (the FIFTHPILLAR) all the time; it appears that guideline, like others, can be used to obstruct contributing editors and defray discussions to no great end; instead of doing that to the CfD, why don't you read the geography lessons contained in my posts and start thinking with more than a Wikipedian admin's narrow field of wiki-view? The evidence supporting all these articles and titles is all over the actual physical map and the history of British Columbia and is part of the vernacular of the place (COMMONNAME). Try reading about it before you hastily close the CfD without really understanding the subjects it's about... `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

605,240,845

` ==Category:Pulitzer Prize for Public Service winners== Please, with respect to that portion of your 19 November 2013 edit reading ``These people may be considered winners of the prize…,`` how did you determine that they may be considered winners of a prize awarded to organizations not to individuals? Thank you. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

605,245,978

`You may want to remove the ``tick`` above. I have removed the Montenegrin National Army from the infobox as it is not clear that he actually took up that command. The details of the agreement are not known (according to Tomasevich, the source in the article), so while there may have been a safe-conduct agreement that included a provision that Djurisic would take up the role, the article says he did not in fact follow the agreement, cross the river and join Drljevic, but instead tried to outsmart Drljevic and the NDH forces by keeping his fighting forces south of the river. Given that a few weeks later, Drljevic was apparently involved in setting a trap for Djurisic and some of Djurisic's forces deserted to Drljevic, they could hardly have been operating any sort of unified command as envisaged in the agreement. I see that there are other sources (not used in this article) you have used for the Montenegrin National Army article. Do any of them shed any further light on the date the agreement was signed, or what Djurisic did following the signing of the agreement? I am keen to resolve this issue one way or the other. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

605,250,793

== Coat of Arms?? == I think the coat of arms is wrong. Why does it have the UK's cost of arms?

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

605,289,916

` ==Pyjamas== The spelling of ``pyjamas`` is not 'British' English. It is the spelling most widely used globally. See: :*Australia :*France :*India :*Ireland :*New Zealand :*Nigeria :*Thailand .`

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

605,296,655

== You added unverified claims to the cdrtools article == Hi, you recently added at least one unverified claim to the cdrtools article when you removed a hint that mentions that libburnia cannot edit images with UDF support. Please either add a verification that libburnia fully supports editing filesystem images even when they include UDF enhancements (needed for DVDs and BluRay disks) or remove the claim you made.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,298,601

` ::A false claim that is created by ``just`` removing important information is still a false claim. UDF is part if the DVD and BD standard but unsupported by libburnia. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,300,649

=='s continual removal of content from Srđa Popović== I noticed you warned about being blocked over this, and since it doesn't seem to have stopped him something has to be done about this. It's been going on for months now.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

605,308,921

::'Sick Nazi ideology' is the subject of academic historiography. Obnoxious NRA propaganda about it isn't. And if you want argue that me objecting to the violation of WP policies is a personal attack, go ahead - but watch out for the boomerang. And as for the RfC, given that it entirely fails to offer the sole policy-compliant option at all, it is clearly invalid from the start.

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

605,315,846

` == another new ref == http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1018341/orion-media-utv-not-bid-gmg-radio Orion Media and UTV did not bid for GMG Radio by Maisie McCabe, 26.07.2010 Phil Riley, chief executive of Midlands radio group Orion Media, has denied he made an offer for Guardian Media Group' radio assets, following weekend reports he had bid for the stations. Riley said:``It’s completely utterly wrong and absolutely not true. I speak to every person in radio every week, but I have not tabled an offer to GMG. That is categorically not true.`` The Sunday Telegraph reported that GMG had turned down offers for GMG Radio from Orion Media and UTV, the operator of the channel three licence in Northern Ireland, because they were too low. It is understood that UTV spoke to GMG’s new chief executive Andrew Miller to say that should GMG decide to dispose of GMG Radio, UTV could be interested in the business, but it did not make a formal offer either. A spokesman for GMG said: ``Our radio stations are attractive assets, so it is unsurprising that we receive expressions of interest from time to time. While we keep our portfolio under constant review, we are not seeking a buyer at this time.`` According to GMG’s annual report GMG Radio, which owns the Real Radio and Smooth Radio brands had a turnover of £50.1m in the year to the end of March 2010 and posted an operating profit before exceptional items and amortisation of intangibles of £0.6 million (up from a £6.6m loss in 2009). However, an impairment of £63.9m was made on the radio assets, reflecting the impact of the recession on growth projections in the short term. UTV declined to comment.`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

605,320,688

21:54, 15 April 2014‎

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

605,333,288

== uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh == fuck you

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

605,347,612

== Issues == There are several things wrong with the article, such as: *It is incomplete. *It does not contain enough information about the actress. *It needs additional sources for verification *The article's lead section is too short and does not adequately summarize the rest of it. Maybe you all can help solve all the issues and add more info about Boone (and please include sources).

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

605,347,937

::This is not a edit war, you are known Hungarian nationalist and was many times charged because of Nationalism and Vandalizm on WP.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,357,258

:I am impressed with the psychoanalytic detective work you have done going down the rabbit hole of my contribution history and perhaps flattered but I am afraid your conclusions are entirely erroneous, Paul... //

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,358,736

::I mean, if I had been going around to a bunch of evolution articles and making controversial edits this might make some sense but I have never done anything remotely like that at all... //

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

605,365,333

: Here you go, OP: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503(v=vs.85).aspx

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,370,010

` ::::Except that Microsoft has changed the user agent string for its browser significantly recently (as is indeed mentioned on that very page). If ``NT`` was no longer an actual designation, surely it would have been removed along with those changes? `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,378,703

` ::::::The so-called Wikipedia:Synthesis in this case is actually not that at all, as it merely concerns a refutation of your argument, and not anything actually written in this article. In any case, though, Microsoft states the following at the link I provided, something that sounds clear enough to me: ``Platform tokens describe your operating system.`` It seems to me that you should provide evidence (as opposed to similar synthesis-like arguments of your own) that Microsoft explicitly no longer considers NT to exist; failing that, the current wording of this article regarding this issue should remain. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

605,380,561

== Template:Workpage == What happened?

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,381,242

** Could you please explain why you think WP:T2 doesn't apply?

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,381,785

** Neither of the template speedy deletion criteria mention transclusion count as a valid reason for declining speedy deletion. I would appreciate it if you linked me to a policy that states this.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

605,381,847

== New article == Per our previous discussions on my talk page, check out: * List of food trucks Cheers,

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

605,411,172

:Not to worry my friend, there's no need to apologize. I appreciate the hard work you put in to make the image. I'll move it to the Bipolar disorder page soon. Thanks again!

2,014

true

user

random

train

false