rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
608,728,360
Oppose. There are seemingly reputable sources out there that can be cited to attach pretty much any label to pretty much any political party. For example, many professors would refer to the Labour Party as 'right-wing'. That doesn't mean that that is what Wikipedia should say. It's just not the consensus! Furthermore, if UKIP were to be labelled 'far-right' on here, I think it would be the first party to be labelled 'far right' on here that does not admit, and has not in the past admitted, to being racially motivated. The Front national in the past admitted it. The British National Party still admits it. UKIP would be, as far as I'm aware, the sole exception, and, especially during an election period, that would come across as political propaganda.
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
608,741,666
::::::NY Times: Behind the Masks in Ukraine, Many Faces of Rebellion :::::::The rebels of the 12th Company appear to be Ukrainians but, like many in the region, have deep ties to and affinity for Russia. They are veterans of the Soviet, Ukrainian or Russian Armies, and some have families on the other side of the border. Theirs is a tangled mix of identities and loyalties. ::::::The NY Times was able to find any evidence that there are Russian troops in Ukraine. Assertions that they are are just crude propaganda from the Kiev central government and/or USG. –
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
608,745,706
==Sammy== Yes I can see why it might be considered vandalism, the fact that before he became a super villain he called himself Sammy. But it is a (referenced) fact. Dunno why you cannot find the article. I'm added further info from it at the moment. I'll post your comment to the talk page.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
608,747,109
` == Sammy == I added the referenced fact the bin Laden was known as ``Sammy`` in his youth. I accept that it might seem like vandalism that the arch super villain had a semi-westernised childhood, but this is an encyclopedic fact. I believe my original edit should be reinstated. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
608,749,009
. This illustrates the difference between an encyclopedic and an unencyclopedic fact.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
608,751,442
==May 2014== One more foolish attack like this and/or vandalism like this, or one more edit summary like this, and you'll find yourself blocked from editing. | .
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
608,755,576
` ::Hey, I don't want to cancel your ego trip; if that means ``Disruptive editing``...go for it, I'm just hoping that Due process operates and the vandal accusation is amended . `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
608,758,751
::::I would like to believe a block log represents a true and fair record of reasons and sanctions. If no one gives a toss about that sort of thing, then I don't either.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
608,760,564
:::::WP:TLDNR
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
608,765,144
`) |} :Replying at your talk page. —'''''' I dont know how to use this ``talk`` feature.. Attempted to delete the logo in Wiki Commons. Can you please e-mail me? [redacted] Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by `
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
608,781,203
== Shelby CV525 == Not fake because I found a reference.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
608,786,171
^^ Wow so 'white' privilege is actually reverse racism?
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
608,806,227
:: Amazing, thank you very much!
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
608,807,640
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2014 == apn news channel
2,014
false
article
random
train
false
608,839,830
Doing a study of paid Wikipedia censors. Which PR firm do you work for, and how much has Koch Industries paid you?
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
608,845,853
`::That's a rather interesting characterization. It would be red flags if I entered this into the article instead of discussing it. The representation of the findings are accurate, and this domain is my wheelhouse. ``The current evidence is encouraging in that acupuncture may be more effective than medication for symptom improvement or relieve pain better than sham acupuncture in acute LBP. `` http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23269281. When the AMA makes a recommendation for something 'non medicinal' like manipulation or acu, and there's a RS, well, it's worth consideration for inclusion in the article. Is the systematic review 'poor' evidence? I was using the term colloquially, but nonetheless, my point remains. `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
608,849,439
` == Federick Isaac Caterer == Oh, I didn't see you created it - when you create something, and nobody else edits it, it's eligible for speedy deletion under criterion {{db-g7}} . But I'd urge you to consider leaving it - if you're the first person to make a typo, you're not going to be the last (and there's nothing to be embarressed about when making tpyos, it happens to us all, eh? ;) ) `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
608,858,710
` == Why compare only to Windows 2000 features? == As this issue has clearly caused quite a bit of confusion, I've decided to address it here. Windows XP is in the unique position - compared to all other Windows releases I can think of - of being at the convergence point of two separate Windows product lines, that of Windows NT and the old, MS-DOS-based Windows 9x. However, the core code in XP is based on the former and not the latter (hence XP has an internal version number of 5.1, while Windows 2000 has one of 5.0 - among numerous other things). A list of every single feature included in Windows ME (the last of the MS-DOS based versions) but not in XP would be quite long indeed, and also quite pointless, because it would be comparing operating systems of two very different architectures. (There's also the fact that comparisons between the other ``List of features removed in Windows`` articles and this one would actually be made far more difficult.) `
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
608,862,590
thanks but i think I do not think it will go and fix that the images are too big? am I wrong?
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
608,892,571
:Correction on the Atlas: its response time actually was (barely) short enough to launch-on-warning, so in fact it WAS a (sorta-kinda) second-strike weapon but the R-16 still wasn't, because of its much longer response time.
2,014
false
article
blocked
test
false
608,902,612
` ::::I should've got the matte finish ... `
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
608,926,457
If you can merge the content from into the History of Paris article and sub articles Siefkin none of your work will be be lost.
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
608,951,409
REDIRECT Talk:Andean condor/Archive 1
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
608,954,802
::Thanks for the offer but I think it's gone beyond the point of return for me...
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
608,972,925
` == Reversion of my recent edit == I assume this careless reversion was directed at my edit but it also had the effect of reverting unrelated contributions by me and another editor. I find the edit summary unhelpful. The editor has apparently not bothered to read the citations, which only show that the earliest citation in the OED comes from 1785, not that this is the ``first recorded use``. I have a copy and the OED makes no such claim. Although the OED is a good approximate guide to when a new word appeared, a thorough trawl will very often uncover something older. My other edits which were reverted are self-explanatory and include the addition of a {{fact}} tag. For now, I shall re-revert all but the removal of the references because it is clear the other editor had not bothered to check what else he was changing in his revert. I shall also add to the ``sources`` I am supposed to have removed. • `
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
608,982,445
:If you have a source, please tell me the link. Regards.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
608,999,113
` :Thank you for letting me know, I had been signing all of my posts, which I thought was weird because I kept receiving notices of this posts. So I checked my preferences, and when I edited my signature, I got rid of the hyperlink. I've fixed it now! '''''''''' `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
609,000,266
:::PS, 2 people were arrested in Escondido for attempting to ignite a new wildfire. That's definitely an arsonist cause.
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
609,016,866
== Please get AIDS == Seriously get something terminal so you will finally get an opportunity to realise what a pathetic life you have. Your complete inability to be constructive is enough to warrant my bile. I hate you so much and feel sad too that something like you can make feel this way. A true honor.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
609,032,420
with author(s) of a source
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
609,036,248
` == Re: Your ``minor`` edits on 29 April == * The subgrouping of Japan is discussed at Talk:List of regions of Japan. You can join. * I have just started a discussion on local names at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan. You can join. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,040,599
` ::I address you with dismissiveness because what you're asserting is of no value. First off, SNUGGUMS and myself both reverted you. So, my viewpoint is actually shared by another as well. • `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
609,040,956
How is that of no value?
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
609,050,696
== Filipinos == So I see you're a big fan of Trindad Pardo de Tavera? Well do this Wiki a favor, and instead of keeping him in the Filipinos article why don't you actually complete his bio speaking to the fact that its empty on the last section. Tavera did NOTHING significant to Filipino history, and clearly you only put his picture because he's of European descent as if you haven't already done so for everybody else. Clearly all of your edits are biased on a religious and ethnic sense, and all of your edits include Mestizos and five Catholic priests. PacificWarrior101
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,061,417
etc CM Punk DID adopt the GO TO SLEEP from KENTA fuking hell! KENTA invented the move CM Punk ADOPTED IT from him GET YOUR BLOODY FACTS RIGHT! you're fuking abusing your power for no reason AND YOU FUKING think you know more wrestling than me just leave me the FUK alone PLEASE!!!! 08:18am
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
609,061,691
AND PLEASE DO SOME RESEARCHING ON GOOGLE AND GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT BEFORE YOU WARN ME BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU'RE ALL THAT BY JUST DOING IT DO YOU KNOW WHATS THAT CALLED? ITS CALLED ABUSIVE POWER IN CASE YOU DIDNT KNOW! 08:22am
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,072,650
{{unblock|1=I don't know if the above text is pertinent to my editing status, but I would like the text removed for aesthetic purposes. Additionally, it is not necessary. I understand that my behavior was unacceptable and will not be repeated. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to your response. Thank you.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,074,076
am sorry for my actions and
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,076,590
what? you are going to change the policy of Wikipedia because of me? You think you are really going to defeat me? You look so ugly , Smalljim.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
609,076,873
? Well as it happens , I will change my editing habits completely, so you will take time to recgonize me. All right
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
609,076,978
Well as it happens , I will change my editing habits completely, so you will take time to recgonize me. All right?|
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
609,079,776
Established romanization conventions for various Amami dialects is posting a false accusation around Wikipedia: I made up my own romanization scheme. I have no idea why he is so confident. He must realize the existence of unknown unknowns, in order to stop damaging Wikipedia. Maybe I need to recall Hanlon's razor, but being extraordinarily stupid is almost malicious. Of course, it is an established linguistic convention to use ï (and ë) for vowels of various Amami dialects that cannot be found in Standard Japanese. And they correspond to kana ウィ and ウェ respectively. An example available online is . If you need an English source, check Moriyo Shimabukuro's The Accentual History of the Japanese and Ryukyuan Languages (2007), for example. Ryulong added weird spelling kamwiyaki to the article. The Web is now tainted by Ryulong's use of the spelling, but at the time of his edit, there seem to have only two sites used the weird spelling. Both sites are based on Okinawan information. Obviously, they are unaware of vowels Okinawan dialects does not have.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
609,079,794
::::Hopeless. How can Ryulong have the nerve to meddle in linguistic topics without knowing linguistics at all? Considering his anti-intellectual attitude, combined with 100-pages-per-day edits, I cannot imagine how tremendous damage he has done to Wikipedia. ::::First of all, he must learn the difference between phonology and phonetics. That's a minimum requirement to join the discussion. Everyone in the field knows the distinction. ::::Showing that Ryulong's accusation against me is groundless is as easy as pie. Just check John R. Bentley's A Linguistic History of the Forgotten Islands (2008) for example. You can find the spellings I used above. ::::The real problem is that the book is a serious linguistic work. If Ryulong reads it without even knowing the distinction between phonology and phonetics, he will taint Wikipedia with another bunch of errors.
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
609,101,367
== The article creation process == Jimbo, please provide your comment on the following, if you're able. #6 May 2013: London First is announced as a sponsor of the 2014 Wikimania conference. #May 2013 through July 2013: Wikipedia had no article about London First. #30 July 2013: Wikipedia writes on Wikipediocracy that London First doesn't have a Wikipedia article. #3 August 2013: Wikipedia creates a Wikipedia article about London First. #Since August 2013: Zero editors have touched the article. #May 2014: Most days, fewer than five readers view the article. Also, consider that the CEO of London First is Jo Valentine, Baroness Valentine, whose BLP has as its top editor a single-purpose account. Do you believe that London First meets Wikipedia standards for inclusion? Do you believe that the presence of the London First article in Wikipedia has anything to do with its being a financial sponsor of Wikimania? Do you believe that the mention of London First on Wikipediocracy had anything to do with its article creation only four days later? Thank you, in advance. -
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
609,104,825
Stop fucking up Wikipedia, faggot.
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
609,109,093
If an image is to be included in the 21st century section I think it should be something with more contemporary significance. I'm not sure what that would be.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
609,125,796
::: CharlieBrown25 has agreed to rest his case in light of my explanation above. I don't foresee any further issues with edit warring now that this has occurred. Consensus is established. Let's move on.
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
609,137,184
Will you do me a favour and just fuk off! 21:00
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
609,137,577
I NEVER FUCKING MADE THIS MOTHER FUCKING ARTICLE I JUST FUCKING EDITED IT AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LONG TIME AGO FUCKING ASSHOLES! PISSING ME OFF @
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
609,156,773
== Russell Targ == Hey I rolled back one of your cn tags, the one for the Nature article. The cite is at the end of the sentence for both publications. - -
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
609,170,146
::I understand your point and I agree to an extent, but native cuisine did not end with the arrival of Europeans. Much of it has been adapted and integrated and even revolutionized in Hawaii Regional Cuisine, for example. Just reading about Native Hawaiian cuisine as if it is some fixed entity that existed in the past is disingenous. Like any cuisine is changed, adapted, modernized, and adjusted with the times. Roy's was started by a native Hawaiian. So the removal of all the content related to western contact, settlement, immigration, and the plantation economy is misguided. Cuisine is never fixed in time. Even the core native cuisine items were in fact imported (taro from which poi (food) is made is not indigenous to Hawaii). I think we should be careful about idealizing or mythologizing.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
609,175,851
Butthurt sandpeople, please don't censor Jewish articles.
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
609,177,009
Looks like good stuff is happening here.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
609,180,698
* Add ref. for 262 area code.
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
609,185,729
` : This guy ``pacificWarrion`` is stupid, I'm working for the Filipino people, for their reputation on this world, every information I shared is to give accurate information's about the Philippines, the Filipino people, their culture and history.`
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,185,887
:Of course it is! Thank for you for your insult, now I shall report you to the administrators at once. PacificWarrior101
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
609,186,802
: thank you for you insult, now do you think you are disrespecting someone?
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
609,187,197
:You are disrespecting Wikipedia by making edits without summaries and sending me useless personal attacks. It is quite clear that your intentions are to waste people's time and troll editors on Wikipedia. The administrators have been notified. PacificWarrior101
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,187,573
: I'm a dear friend of ambassador Domecq, all your messages will be sent to the embassy. CODE NAME: AMOR, Greetings to my friends residing in the Philippines. *
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,189,487
Moved to draft space== I've moved this copypasted pastiche to draft space as it wasn't ready for mainspace. A few points to remember: *There is nothing to split from the cuisine of Hawaii article. Splitting occurs when we have too much content and some must be moved elsewhere. That is not the situation here. There is nothing to remove from the parent topic. *What was recommended is for an editor to take up the task of expanding the subject, spinning out the topic into a new daughter article. This involves an editor who is willing and interested to research and write about the cuisine of Native Hawaiian and to give it an expanded scope and treatment in a larger space. This means expanding what we already have, not moving it to another article and adding more copypaste from other articles. Writing means, doing the research, reading the books and scholarly papers, and doing the hard work. It does not mean taking what we already have and duplicating it over and over again. That's not how this works. *You basically duplicated the entire cuisine of Hawaii article here. Since that's a completely different topic, it makes no sense to talk about ethnic and local cuisine here. If you don't know what the cuisine of Native Hawaii entails, then do the research. It does not mean any food that anyone of Native Hawaiian ethnicity eats. It has a specific, pre-contact definition and scope. *When you copied the content, you also copied the sources without adding the actual references. As a result, nobody can easily verify the content. Of course, I can, since I'm the one that went to the library and found the books and cited them in the original article. You will have to add each full source to this article, otherwise it will get moved back to draft/sandbox space again. You can't just keep copying material without doing the hard work. You will need to add each single full reference to this article. Don't expect others to cleanup after you, especially when other editors did the actual research and footwork you refuse to do. *Per the MOS, please do not surround text with multiple images. Candleabracadabra, you've been reminded of this many times now. Keep this in draft space until you've done the necessary work. This will involve serious research on your part. It will not involve copying and pasting material from already existing articles. ==
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
609,192,537
: Of course you do! PacificWarrior101
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
609,192,705
` == User:86.174.240.211 is at it again == Hello, I take it you're an admin. You should check my talk page, the guy is at it again with his personal attacks. He left this message, ``I'm a dear friend of ambassador Domecq, all your messages will be sent to the embassy. CODE NAME: AMOR, Greetings to my friends residing in the Philippines.`` He's impersonating another professional diplomat. PacificWarrior101`
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
609,224,847
REDIRECT Talk:World Affairs Conference
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
609,232,212
: Sorry, I'm not an admin. I will say, it's pretty obvious (in my eyes) that this user has some agenda they're trying to push (though I have no idea what it is). Your best bet would be to contact , the admin who dealt with the original thread at ANI. They said they were going to keep an eye on the page.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
609,252,073
==Weathering== As the article states, weathering- with the aid of water as a catalyst assists or promotes alkali feldspar alteration into kaolinite by means of hydrolysis. This differs from the mechanical actions of weathering which include mass wasting by means of expansion/contraction, impact, or exfoliation. The alteration process in this case is a chemical reaction of specific rock components to dissolved ions, more pronounced by the increased acidity of the rain.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
609,255,830
` :Thanks for the help. I'm not ``trying`` to edit war, I was just making a couple changes to the infobox mosaic, I had a few constructive images, I did make sure that I didn't three-vert again but I did read rules regarding trying to ``game`` the season, that's not what I'm trying to do which is why I simply stopped after the first revert in the post-block situation. PacificWarrior101`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,255,877
` ==Cuisine== ==Urhobo cuisine== I am trying to figure out the cuisine. The article says the Urhobo eat Iriboto, Iriberhare, and Okpariku. I can't find anything in a Google search or in Google books for any of these dishes except mirrors with one exception. This source which gives me a snipped view that says ``their preparation and consumption such as Ukodo,Oghwevwri,Irhiboto,Ovwovwo,(Ophopho), Okpariku and Amiedi.`` Is there anyone who can get me the full sentence and preceding sentences? I saw in some sort of WikiNews type update that it was possible to get research assistance directly through Wikipedia to Australian librarians? How do I do that? Any other suggestions are welcome Thanks very much. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
609,258,135
` == Graphite undo == Who are you to decide what's a ``useless comparison`` ? These wiki articles are designed for education. Making contrast and comparisons is an essential part of learning. Please don't assume more authority than you are allowed Your continuous ignorance in this field is frustrating to helpful editors.`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,260,168
== I Have Made Changes to the Images/Mosaic Discussion Section == As you people have known, a huge edit war took place between I and some IP user from Britain, faking to be an embassy worker and a worker for the King of Spain. So here is a section, for discussions regarding the people on the mosaic and infobox simply to prevent another huge edit war from taking place. So, I have added Sultan Kudarat in favor of José María of Manila, since is he the only Philippine national hero from the Moro region. Additionally I have also added Said Basher albeit he is a national Islamic imam, in to accompany the existing Roman Catholic priests (San Pedro Calungsod and Francisca del Espíritu Santo Fuentes). This equalizes it, two Roman Catholics and two Muslims. Also, I have put Jesús A. Villamor since he was a prominent Filipino fighter during World War II. Any opposing opinions, objections should be discussed on this section. PacificWarrior101
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
609,269,803
Indeed. Again, thanks for the help. PacificWarrior101
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,279,197
I hope you don't mind. Thanks again.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,279,595
I found a discussion from 2012 in archive 2 of the Cuisine of Hawaii talk page where there was a consensus to split the article. Ancient Hawaiian cuisine (I think) was one of the two possible names. That would narrow the scope according to your desires.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,286,322
` == Legality == With regard to ``tontines have been banned in Britain[citation needed]``, I can find nothing on http://www.legislation.gov.uk/all?text=tontine to say they are illegal, but various laws referring to their use, the implication being they are not illegal in the UK. `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
609,286,640
` What... no answer? You're a complete moron for claiming such comparison made is ``pointless and unsourced``. I merely expanded on a comparison made on the diamond page and importing the graph from that page. If you are a consistent anal retentive, then you should also remove that comparison as well. But we both know you're a fool! Furthermore, the comparison made between graphite and diamond is made in geology classes around the world. Why do you feel that your ignorance is a merit for judgment?`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,286,685
` You're a complete moron for claiming such comparison made is ``pointless and unsourced``. I merely expanded on a comparison made on the diamond page and importing the graph from that page. If you are a consistent anal retentive, then you should also remove that comparison as well. But we both know you're a fool! Furthermore, the comparison made between graphite and diamond is made in geology classes around the world. Why do you feel that your ignorance is a merit for judgment?`
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
true
609,288,466
` :I don't think I ever accused Kelapstick of Gamesmanship. Perhaps you misunderstood one of my comments? He speedy closed the last AfD. Now we are at AfD again. It's been an enormous waste of my time and a great source of frustration. I do think he owes me an apology, but I understand that admins don't make mistakes. I can only imagine if I had redirected an article after a ``speedy keep`` close at an AfD. But there's a lot of bullshit that goes on here and sometimes it stinks. Kelapstick has also followed me to other articles and engaged in damaging edits. He also voted to delete the same article he closed the AfD for as Speedy Keep yesterday. SO consider this a final warning that Kelapstick's disruptive behavior and gamesmanship is not acceptable. Now I said it and I stand by it. You want to explain his dishonest assertion that the article is ``author requests deletion``? It's bullshit. He knows it. You know it. I know it. So there we have it. If you want to explain a speedy keep close and his false accusations that I am trying to delete the article go for it. But this is more b.s. from you Drmies. I have no doubt that you are eager to block me. I've been a witness to various abuses by you including the extent to which you will go to enforce you personal POV on article content. That's why I try to avoid you but you chose to involve yourself in the Hawaii drama. As far as personal attacks, shove em. You and your buddy hasfajen have been launching jibes at me for a long time and I've put up with them. So take your own medicine. You want to clean up the personal attacks? Start with your buddies and their disruption and unprovoked personal attacks on me. You've been warned. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,290,313
` : @SPECIFICO:: Go contribute. Something. Anything. Expand a stub. Rewrite the grammar on a section of a random article. Even a cursory examination of your edit history is evidence that the only activities you get into are the removal of content you dislike by attacking the sourcing, without ever actually adding or improving sourcing. You then get into endless talk page circlejerk arguments and end up in repetitious dispute resolution procedures. You are a net drain on wikipedian resources. I'm not going to play that. You're right in only one thing: the ``philosopher`` numbered citations are not needed in the lead sentence... that fact is well-established throughout the article. I only leave them there to appease. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
609,292,267
` ::Yeah well, I didn't appreciate Kelapstick's snide ``you've been here for years and should know better bullshit``. As I made clear I am not an admin and can't move articles over redirects. I can't nominate an article for deletion in userspace, it tells you it has to be an article space. I can't have a redirect deleted when it's contentious. So I did my fucking best and he can take his snide comments and shove em. I had to do another AfD and it's still not right because it doesn't show the previous ones. It's a colossal waste of my fucking time and I don't appreciate it. The article has been moved all over the freaking place wily nily including into my userspace where someone who is not welcome on my talkpage shouldn't mucking about. The consensus for the article is clear as it was in 2012. So this whole escapade is an exercise in futility. And then we have your other buddy Hafspajen jumping in with his nasty innuendos and repeated accusations of bad faith. So you want to rein in the incivility? Go for it Drmies. But don't get made at me for telling the truth. When you guys create a mess and involve yourself in it and muck it up, and you get stuck doing mopping I don't break a sweat. Cry me a river. I don't create articles in bad faith EVER and I don't edit in bad faith EVER and I try to keep a sense of humor about all the attacks I face, but I don't like it. So if I hurt your feelings, good. You deserve it. Show your fellow lowly editors a little respect in the future and don't act like such arrogant wp:dicks. Does that article still exist? I remember some fascinating debate about it. I'm sorry if you have to eat your own pudding on occasion. Next time order something else. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
true
609,293,101
The yuca page over the previous disambig looks good to me.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,296,080
I am being unfairly blocked for protesting in defense of having helpful complied contributions made being deleted by an individual with lack of reasoning. I believe this case should be examined by an unbiased party and the editor V. Smith reviewed for his unjust and haste reaction without providing an explanation first.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,297,240
== Can you look Ambedkar page? == I ask you kindly look Ambedkar Page and the user theredpedofdoom , he is constantly reverting the edits of other articles also. He removed the table from Ambedkar page. With regards.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
609,297,807
Can you please look the page of Ambedkar? A user removed the Table (List of Books) from the page. Theredpenofdoom is a user who is constantly reverting the changes made by other users. Metta
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
609,297,857
== hello == Can you please look the page of Ambedkar? A user removed the Table (List of Books) from the page. Theredpenofdoom is a user who is constantly reverting the changes made by other users. Metta
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
609,298,247
==WP Badges Reward== Sorry, none this time for violating WP policy on other's contributions.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,299,799
==Otpor!== My bad. My browser crashed during editing. When I restored the session I didn't notice that a large portion of the article was no longer there in the edit window and hit Save thereby removing all the content.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,302,468
== Arimaspi and the Maspii of Herodotus == I believe that Herodotus mentions the Merephi aligned with the Maspii; further linking two notable figures named Amasis with this tribe, and 'Isse-dones' being very similar to the 'Isapzais', or 'Ise-sattvas'[Rishi-sattvas' and the Nicchibi, or 'Licchavi' mentioned by the historians of Alexander of Macedon, a further connection, based on their association with the Indian Shisunaga, the Susunak of Elam, and the Shishank of Egypt with his Sikkim and visit to Shechem, is made between the 'Massebah',or Ma-Shiva, or Ma-Shiba, pillars mentioned in Genesis and the Syrian form of this word which is Nisibis. Though it would seem that if this were so the Buddhists would have distinguished between the Sibbi tribe and the Licchavis. It is interesting to note that the Vedic 'Rta', probably related to 'Rishi', is used in a similar sense as the secondary meaning carried with 'Massebah'
2,014
false
article
blocked
test
false
609,312,231
` == Nice meeting you == Stephen, it was great to meet you at the Maker Faire on Saturday. It was my first year going, and I had no idea WP would be there, but it makes a lot of sense, WP being not only a great resource for creators, but also one of the best collections of creative people. I have seen your name on various discussions—you're doing a great job, BTW— and was glad to be able to connect your name with the person. (FWIW, you are the first other Wikipedian I am aware of having met since I became one, almost 8 years ago.) No reply necessary; I just wanted to say hello. `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
609,313,323
I see nothing wrong with the tone; it seems quite a complex subject.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
609,316,568
*You're welcome. Note that I blocked you before I saw the above message. Either way I'm not crying a river.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
609,321,212
I said to come on talkpage not on my wall. Don't show your dictatorship on wikipedia pages.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,324,461
Admins should watch this user > Thepedofdoom , He/She is cntinously vandalyzing the articles of Wikipedia. The same can be checked on his contribution page. This user should be blocked definitely.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,324,737
== Check the user TheRedPenofdoom == The user whom you just messaged is vandaliyzing the wikipedia pages from a long time. If you check his contribution you will find that he only reverts the changes and is vandalyzing the pages. Please do check brother and also you can find the user comments on his talk page. With regards,
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,326,558
== Consider watching ...Theredpenofdoom. == Do watch the user . He is vandalazing the wikipedia pages. You should visit his talkpage and his contribution section to see that he only erase the wikipedia links. Thanks in Advance.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,326,874
== Watch the user Theredpenofdoom == Watch the user theredpenofdoom . See the redmarks. He is vandalazying the whole wikipedia.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,327,151
` @SPECIFICO:: Go contribute. Something. Anything. Expand a stub. Rewrite the grammar on a section of a random article. Even a cursory examination of your edit history is evidence that the only activities you get into are the removal of content you dislike by attacking the sourcing, without ever actually adding or improving sourcing. You then get into endless talk page circlejerk arguments and end up in repetitious dispute resolution procedures. You are a net drain on wikipedian resources. I'm not going to play that. You're right in only one thing: the ``philosopher`` numbered citations are not needed in the lead sentence... that fact is well-established throughout the article. I only leave them there to appease. (The preceding comment that was deleted by .) :`
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
609,327,660
== Talk page. == yes I am a sock. I don't lie just like Theredpenofdoom lies. You should watch his contribution to wikipedia and the comments of other users on his talkpage. Please go here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/TheRedPenOfDoom With regards, If you can't do something then please keep a check this user.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
609,330,822
` :Drmies you are full of shit. As has been pointed out to you, you should not be blocking where you are involved. But rest assured I consider it an honor to be blocked by you. I am sure that you believe you are an honest decent fellow. Some of the worst liars begin with lies to themselves. I stand by all of my comments. They are true and accurate. The abuse I described is 100% accurate and far from me needing to be blocked the editors attacking me should be, but it will never happen. I don't sweat it, but I'm not going to stay silen about the abuse. Dishonest, bullying and harasment are not okay. The abusive history and the NUMEROUS accusations of bad faith against me speak for themselves. I have been absolutely transparent about my reasoning and motives and I am very happy with the work I've done here. I am most proud that I have stood up against some of the worst admin abuse, dishonest and harassment by POV pushers like Drmies and other dishonest characters that abuse Wikipedia to advance their personal point of view and gang up on people they disagree with me. Your ridiculous ``associate professor is no more notable than a professor`` commentary is a perfect example. You want to be held in high esteem and to be highly respected. But respect is earned Drmies and there is very little about your behavior or how you treat others that merits respect. You should stop drinking so much and reflect on who you are as a person. Seriously. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
609,330,958
:::Actually, I was talking about Viriditas. His edit history speaks for itself. You are welcome to defend redirecting and userfying an article after an AfD was closed as speedy keep and other repeated moves against consensus. But these actions speak for themselves. We all know what would happen to me if I did something like that.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,331,492
I endure from your buddies and other ne'er do wells
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
609,332,629
== non-interaction == As is my human right to choose those who I associate with and not associate with, you are hereby requested and required to limit your interactions with me to the only those issues ''directly' to article content. You will no longer move my comments, comment on my comments to others, or otherwise impede my ability to communicate with others. Your bias and decorum have made this course of action the only possible, and in the future I advise you avoid getting yourself between with the interactions of other editors. No reply or acknowledgement of this message is needed, only your adherence to it.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false