dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
610,758,128	` Per WP:BLPREMOVE: ``Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced; that is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see No original research); that relies on self-published sources, unless written by the subject of the BLP (see below); or that relies on sources that fail in some other way to meet Verifiability standards.`` :The first Cosmo article relies on the Daily Mirror which is not a RS and is qualified as follows: ``Rumoured love``, ``alleged actress girlfriend``, ``Rumours first surfaced...``, and ``rumoured romance``. The second Cosmo article is qualified as follows: ``apparently breaks up``, ``It looks like``, ``It seems``, ``Apparently it was``, ``Despite rumours``. :It doesn't matter what the publication is, this is tabloid gossip and doesn't belong on Wikipedia per WP:NOTGOSSIP: ``content hosted in Wikipedia is not for: Scandal mongering, promoting things 'heard through the grapevine' or gossiping. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy.`` `	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
610,763,361	And more star wars=== I feel that since it is not an official or recognized holiday except by those who love it, and the fact there is no real purpose other than for the previously stated reasons, it should not be added as a holiday. It is declared by many sources it is an unofficial holiday. An unofficial payday is not a payday. An unofficial holiday is not a holiday. =	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
610,766,052	. ::: QG is indeed an active medical editor, but also one of the most controversial, to the point where I often stay away from articles he edits, which are often my favorite topics, the ones in which I'm a recognized expert in the real world. It's simply impossible to communicate effectively with him. He has a de facto IDHT, very tendentious, form of communication, and merely repeats claims and his own ideas, without addressing the concerns brought up by other editors. That he is usually defending and promoting a scientific skepticism POV (which is usually the same as the mainstream scientific and medical POV) is fine, but collaboration is essential, and his communication needs to be vastly improved. He only gets truly communicative when he's being threatened with a block, and then he suddenly will bend and bow and cooperate to the nth degree, but that stops when he's back into safe territory. When such an editor keeps me from editing my favorite topics, then you know something's really wrong. He gives skeptics a bad name. He has also been known to go on rampages through articles, doing exactly the opposite of what he usually does, supporting fringe POV and destroying mainstream content, the type he usually adds to articles. It's been a while since he did this, but it's been known to happen, making one wonder what type of mind we're dealing with. Wikipedia would be better off without him. A thorough CU would bring to light some astounding things.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
610,779,592	::::I am not a professor of Thai politics, either; but there are professors (or assistant professors, or lecturers, their actual academic title is not that important) of Thai politics who have published their observations and analysis of the current conflict. Several are already linked in the article (Pavin, McCargo, Montesano, Nelson, Ukrist), we could add many more (Pasuk & Baker, Connors, Thitinan, ...) Each of them has their own thoughts and explanations of what is behind this crisis, including social conflict (lower/lower-middle class vs. upper-middle/upper class), regional conflict (North/Northeast vs. South; or capital vs. periphery), economic interests, and also succession (at least mentioned by Pavin and Thitinan; I think it is not that important what journalists say, scholars are better qualified to analyse the political/social/economic/cultural... backgrounds). In my opinion it is problematic to only mention one theory of what is the background of this conflict in the lead section, and neglect the other reasons that are discussed by high-profile analysts as well. This would be selective and unbalanced in my view. I would rather have a separate section in which all potential causes of the conflict can be discussed, mentioning which author(s) represent them (and, if any, which author(s) reject them). If we discuss all potential reasons that are contributed to the debate by any analyst in the lead section, the lead will be huge. And this could daunt readers rather than inviting them to continue reading.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
610,780,034	==In defense of the old portrait== It is a pity that, having so many portraits of Peter III, the article is illustrated by a coin. The coin is contemporaneous, but the portrait is simple and non descriptive. However, the portrait of the Nuova Cronica is more adequate. Offers an image of the King, is the most old portrait of him in Commons (was painted only two or three decades after his death) and has resemblance to the true face of the King (recently reconstruced by computer using his skull) and shows real characteristics of his appearance (Peter III dyed his hair to blonde, which justifies that in the portrait the king appears with blond hair and brown beard).	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
610,809,720	Could be any king of any time, the picture doesn't even have a beard, unlike Peter III). If the coin were the only visual material Commons, ok, but it is not.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
610,825,918	` == Rise of E-Cig use and fall of tobacco use == @DocJames: I'm a little bit confused... You've changend my contribution in that way, that only the rise of E-Cig use is left over. You have written yesterday: ``One also needs to look at if they decrease cig usage or increase cig use in society as a whole.`` So: Why do you delete a contribution, that is dealing precisely with that topic? `	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
610,845,328	` == Gotcha! == An artist who likes using the names of his creations as his pseudonymns. ``...Every night at the stroke of midnight, the master turns into a screaming, maniacal, demonic, raging, bloodlusting animal!`` ``And then I get mean!`` -Vincent Price :You think it's funny? Actually, it's sad...but that's a concept not part of your brain...that's EVEN MORE SAD. :Your drawings look like those of an underdeveloped mind, like from a child. It perfectly fits!! And I also love your friends for having great realism implanted in their small brains: http://www.orionsarm.com/ (ZERO ideas, just describing the real world, that's creative undershit, hahahahaha) :You, my dear friend, are genetic crap and you know it. Beside that, I know 7 billions that would love to kill asses like you. Go home and never come back...we won't miss you! Noooo, there is no real love for you, you took the wrong junction at the last galaxy, void-head. So now go fuc*k your inborn BLINDERS in front of your head, thanks! `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
610,846,933	==Category:Members of paramilitary and terrorist organizations== :Category:Members of paramilitary and terrorist organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
610,864,192	` == Vandalize?! == I would have ignored your message normally (and by ignore I mean let you live), but why on earth would you call my edit ``vandalize`` while it obviously was not? I merely added a category that I thought was appropriate with absolutely no intent to ``vandalize``. You could've said it was something you don't agree with, or even something that most people who edit here don't agree with. You could've directed your ``warning`` at my (very real) threat. Like ``the next time you threaten someone``. Call me what you want, but I'm not a petty ``vandalizer``. I usually feel lazy to cross international lines to do just one thing, but I'm glad to tell you that you've signed your own death warrant and as long as you and the guy who reverted it are in the same country, both of you can look forward to a painful death very shortly. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
610,873,652	== Question == Hi,I was just wondering if this season was still on	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
610,878,206	Thanks so much for the warm welcome !	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
610,882,543	` - lol - I don't know maybe she wants it to be a secret like some actresses but her admiring fans need to know ;) haha ya I just love that name `` Hesione Hushabye `` cheers `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
610,895,115	:AP is still undivided, you have already agreed to wait till June 2nd, let us leave this issue here. Both of us needs to contribute to wiki, reverting will be loss to you and me as well. Let's concentrate on other topics to help improve wiki. If you have any comments talk back.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
610,906,640	REDIRECT Talk:Tana River cisticola	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
610,922,375	How do I do that?	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
610,967,606	2014 (UTC) ==Objection to removal of text in real prices and ideal prices article== I object strongly that you have removed chunks of text, without proper explanation and discussion of your reasons, in the real prices and ideal prices article. It seems as though you are on an ideological campaign to cut stuff out of articles which you happen to think is rubbish. You have to prove it is rubbish, not simply autocratically remove material because it doesn't fit with your ideology. You are not an expert on this topic, so tread carefully and discuss your proposed changes. 19:14, 31 May	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
610,967,863	==Objection to removal of text in real prices and ideal prices article== I object strongly that you have removed chunks of text, without proper explanation and discussion of your reasons, in the real prices and ideal prices article. It seems as though you are on an ideological campaign to cut stuff out of articles which you happen to think is rubbish. You have to prove it is rubbish, not simply autocratically remove material because it doesn't fit with your ideology. You are not an expert on this topic, so tread carefully and discuss your proposed changes.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
610,978,957	::Great discussion point Jimbo, although I don't think discussion is actually required, the foundation should be able to just do this without the support of the users that are disputing the edits. In really difficult disputed issues I agree the wikimedia Foundation could hire experienced editors, although I wouldn't support any wikipedia connected interviewers, use and pay someone totally independent - independent notable reporters to interview and report on the problematic content issue and report that in a wp:rs source thus giving full independent closure to the dispute.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
610,983,830	If you leave me a message here, I will ignore it and delete it. I do not care what you have to say.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
610,985,440	Screw you.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	true
610,986,434	You're a fucking retard.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
610,997,130	It is clear to me you have read things out of context. Are you aare that I am emailing all stewards and oversight to correct an issue corporate has been grappling with for 3 years? I've been emailing Sue Gardner and Jimmy. I am very busy with this page, and yes, if you had read the content and will return tomorrow, you'll see whatthe steward and oversight and Jimmy and Sue are waiting to see... the solution to the problem of attrition - new user attrition - you know... people like me. If the block isn't lifted then your co-founder, your CEO, every steward and every mmber of oversight will not get what I've promised them. And the refferences to legal ARE the issue. It's a public arena in which WP invites members to defame the character of other users. The users who do it are violating federal law. I've come up ith the solution and you've just blocked it,. If you can't take the time to read through the materials, verify the email I've sent and study the history, and you don't remove the block, then I am left with no alternative save to repost this message with a template summons to Sue - something like [<== intentioinally wrong this time - and sorry to be so brazen but I am already 50 mins late with this.]] so you don't make me look like a fool. Thank you.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
610,997,326	Wait a minute... your name is Panda and you think it's offensive to give people animal refferences?] Inciddntally I am only about 7 weeks old. Jimmy thinks you should not be biting me.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
610,997,540	Wait another minute... I just read wwhere these cited violations are meant to be preventative; not punitive.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,004,531	` : Courtesy message to those whom I wish to acknowledge as model Admins; some good (TenofAllTrades); some not (Panda)... yet, and speak with for the report... I guess that will be in 60 hours or so... I wish someone like would take the time to do their due diligence and see what it is I am doing for WMF... I am not wound up. I am 2 hours late on my report to corporate OUR CORPORATE! Read below, please and research if you mut. I restored the block because he added depth to the report, but that didn't help this situation one bit. - Thanks. Dr. Original Message Subject: Am working on a project for Sue Gardner/Stewards and Advisory Board Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:14:21 -0400 From: Matt To: wikien-bureaucrats@lists.wikimedia.org CC: Matt H I've been in communication with them all and was completing an email to Jimmy Wales re the report (it is about, ironically Admin abuse of power, the culture within, and the source of the attrition issues facing WMF for the past 3 years). In short THEY (formerly YOU) set an example of bullying behavior. That's not important. . Part of the research process requires me to invoke the best and worst behavior in order to have data for the study. DangerousPanda just blocked me for 60 hours and I have been keeping Sue, Jimmy, the Stewards and Oversight up to date... I had a report due into them over 90 mins ago. What am I going to do now? HELP! Thanks Dr. Matt Hogendobler User:PresidentistVB P. S. He's bragging about it in the Admin noticeboards group. Fortunately for him, there's another admin with some sense to share with him. This is perfect data! But I am still in jail and I don't dare call Sue on a Sunday. :* He cannot; he's been blocked (by me) for a whole whackload of reasons that are painfully obvious to all :: ...and he's removed his block notice. I'll let someone else take care of that ::: Er, lest there be any confusion or misunderstanding, blocked users are free to remove block notices from their own talk pages. There is no requirement that they wear a scarlet letter for the duration of their block, so for the moment there is nothing to ``take care of``. Encouraging someone else to go to his talk page and replace the block notice is just poking the bear. (And it's pretty obvious that this particular editor is already more than sufficiently wound up....) :::A problem only arises if a blocked editor removes notices related to his or her block and then requests unblocking—the concern in such a situation is that an editor may be attempting to conceal or mislead regarding the reasons for their block. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,010,539	took the changes not to be good faith edits. However, I've since found that different publications vary on this, with either date listed. I will look further, then footnote this in the article.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
611,030,815	== A page you started (List of U.S. cities with large Cambodian-American populations) has been reviewed! == Thanks for creating List of U.S. cities with large Cambodian-American populations, Cyanidethistles! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: Creative! To reply, leave a comment on OccultZone's . Learn more about page curation.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
611,040,082	== Correction re. cast iron == I want to tell you personally (just in case you missed looking at the ref desk) that I was WRONG re. the point where a binary iron-carbon system goes from iron-cementite to iron-graphite I said the transition point is at about 2% carbon, but in fact it NEVER transitions to iron-graphite unless silicon is added as an alloying element. My apologies,	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,045,956	The way psychiatrists have been plotting against the Church of Scientology to prevent The Tech from working and prevent man from getting real gains deserves mention here.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
611,056,834	== Proposed deletion of Muggle Quidditch Nederland == Hello, Danachos. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Muggle Quidditch Nederland, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted: # edit the page # remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} # save the page Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway. You can leave a note on if you have questions.	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
611,060,773	:::These are primary sources and they are OK for plot sections, but not for marketing.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,061,898	` And, can I ask, when were you elected spokesman for ``every reputable historian on the planet``? `	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
611,062,928	` == Your submission at AfC Amihahi Grosz was accepted == Amihahi Grosz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! '''''' `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
611,075,300	They are known as Palestinian because of Arab propaganda. Real Palestinians are Jews. Arab Palestinians are frauds from Arabia.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
611,078,204	== I hope you like what you started == I shouldn't have been banned. That was a complete abuse and utter bullshit. I hope you like the disruption you have caused to the project. My ban needs to be overturned so I can stop advocating for it to be undone. You guys took a dedicated editor and me out of the project just so you could keep pushing POV and free the admins to be abusive. I hope your happy. When my ban is overturned I'll walk away. But until then I a never going to stop commenting because it was abusive and never should have been allowed. Kumioko	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,078,286	== Me ban == I shouldn't have been banned. That was a complete abuse and utter bullshit. I hope you like the disruption you have caused to the project. My ban needs to be overturned so I can stop advocating for it to be undone. You guys took a dedicated editor and me out of the project just so you could keep pushing POV and free the admins to be abusive. I hope your happy. When my ban is overturned I'll walk away. But until then I a never going to stop commenting because it was abusive and never should have been allowed. Kumioko	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
611,081,013	P.S. I found out about your work after having the interview highlighted to me at wmuk:Engine room#BBC article - Wikipedia and health.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
611,084,563	== Karrine_Steffans == https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karrine_Steffans&diff;=prev&oldid;=611059275 hello there, I had to take down two of your stories. I was speculating as to why you wrote them, did you have wp:rs writing that she was African American? if so please link a dink me to them, ta	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
611,085,426	from 10 December 2013 - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karrine_Steffans&diff;=585481289&oldid;=585411129 -	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,088,018	== Infobox == Just of a note people, I might be changing the infobox to make it resemble to one on the Arabs article, and try to include a couple ancient and medieval Arab Christians, and Arab Christians from each nation. Isaac of Nineveh can fit both an ancient Arab Christian and representative of Bahrain. PacificWarrior101	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
611,112,272	:: How long do you think it's gonna take to update these things?	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
611,114,547	I'll block Excirial! He blocked me!	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,115,228	== Not African American == Do not write a story that she is African American http://bossip.com/888858/karrine-superhead-steffans-explains-slavery-comments-every-brown-person-is-not-the-same/	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
611,116,197	== 1964: Space Edition on 06/04/2014 == I love making this series, but I didn't get any barnstars because I didn't make it up the rank unless I get my Content Review Medal and my Gold WikiAward.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
611,122,592	== yo == davis v machida is full of shit. im changing it again. how about wikipedia concern itself with facts and not nut hugging.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	true
611,122,879	== STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
611,123,636	` Machida returned to his native Brazil to face Phil Davis on August 3, 2013 at UFC 163.[44][45] In a unanimous result, Davis defeated Machida via decision.[46][47] 13 of 13 ufc media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida.[47] Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, after neither fighter was able to mount any significant offense. Davis mounted significant offense, as it won him the fight. ESPN scored for Davis. Many UFC shills with hall passes that could be taken away and votes on the ufc rankings, but zero in the way of journalistic credentials of any discernible pedigree in journalism scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] UFC promoter, sport hater, and just bleed advocate, Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ``Machida definitely won`` and ``MMA judging sucks``.[50] Fightmetric Analysis supports this, showing that Machida outstruck Phil Davis, and neutralized 80% of Davis' takedown attempts, with a significantly higher efficiency rating through all three rounds.[51] ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory for davis. theres the truth. i challenge any man, woman or trans to dispute one word of it. wikilies has taken the place of a once great outlet for truth.`	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
611,123,922	(and zero explanation of how this was arrived at)	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
611,125,432	` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
611,125,934	` In a unanimous result, - result is determined by judges not opinions of drunk fans. result wasnt controversial, it was unanimous. Davis defeated Machida via decision.[46][47] 13 of 13 ufc media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida. - espn scored for davis. the shills listed are all ufc affiliates and have zero journalistic credentials or pretense of neutrality. Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, after neither fighter was able to mount any significant offense. Davis mounted significant offense, as it won him the fight. - self explanatory. davis won the fight from his offense, and in a sport, that is significant. ESPN scored for Davis. Many UFC shills with hall passes that could be taken away and votes on the ufc rankings, but zero in the way of journalistic credentials of any discernible pedigree in journalism scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] - self explanatory UFC promoter, sport hater, and just bleed advocate, Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ``Machida definitely won`` and ``MMA judging sucks``.[50] - dana is neither neutral, nor trustworthy, nor an authority on mma scoring. he went on to complain about the hendricks v gsp fight saying its about damage. its not about damage. therefore the man is a liar or an ass. he didnt make the unified rules, has a detailed history of sport hating and attacking judges at all opportunity. he has waged a campaign of journalist tampering and is known for hating elements of the sport, he supposedly champions. Fightmetric Analysis shows davis landed more strikes in round 1 2 and over all, and neutralized 80% of Davis' takedown attempts (something not scored in mma), with a significantly higher efficiency rating (and zero explanation of how this was arrived at) through all three rounds.[51] - facts. and the efficiency thing has zero credence, as the site linked has zero explanation attacked for how it arrived at its conclusion. click the explanation button and nothing comes up. ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory for davis.`	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
611,126,485	` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. Please, undo the damage you are doing to Wikipedia, stop doing more damage, and I will have no reason to leave any more messages on your talk page.`	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
611,126,945	` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. Please, undo the damage you are doing to Wikipedia, stop doing more damage, and I will have no reason to leave any more messages on your talk page. If you think you are right, stop blocking me, removing my edits, and prove me wrong! Like this, you are just showing you are arogant and don't stand criticism of what you are doing!`	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
611,128,396	` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. Please, undo the damage you are doing to Wikipedia, stop doing more damage, and I will have no reason to leave any more messages on your talk page. If you think you are right, stop blocking me, removing my edits, and prove me wrong! Like this, you are just showing you are arrogant and don't stand criticism of what you are doing! You are just a petty person! You can't win the argument, so you are eliminating the other side in the talk! Go ahead, block me! But that won't change the fact that you are abusing the powers given to you, and you don't stand criticism! So go ahead, abuse your powers again.`	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	true
611,130,406	:Indeed. And according to the analysis of the statistical expert appointed to assess the Stargate investigations, RV functioning was definitively established in that investigation. Sceptic Hyman agreed that he could not find a flaw, and had content himself with saying 'I am not convinced there isn't a problem, the universal 'get out of jail free' card. Anyway, this is a fruitless argument and I'm going to uncheck 'watch this page'.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,130,734	i just took out a bunch of Grana refs - the Health section was overcited and overdetailed on the variability issue	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,134,202	I stand by all the corrections I made, and all the criticism I direct at you! And it is YOU who is continuing the edit-warring, by reverting without an explanation the corrections I made, in order to improve the truthfulness of information presented on Wikipedia. Yet, instead of supporting me in that effort, you keep blocking me, removing my corrections and reverting to the biased and incorrect information. Since you call it like that - edit-warring, I will remind you that for any war you need two sides. Have you examined the moves of the other side in this alleged edit-warring? I strongly doubt it, because you sided with that side, and took part in edit-warring. Is that what you are supposed to do?	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
611,136,253	== Göttinger Hainbund == There are similarities to the contemporary German 'Göttinger Hainbund'.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
611,141,481	== Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2014 == Bowe Bergdahl was released in a prisoner exchange yesterday. Can someone please remove him from the missing captured section? There are no more MIAs.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
611,141,952	Ok, he's been removed from the search engine but his poster is now archived like Bin Laden. I apologize for doubting you. Hamaha is 100% dead. http://search.state.gov/search?site=rfj_en_rfj&client;=rfj_en_rfj&output;=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet;=rfj_en_rfj&ie;=utf8&oe;=utf8&lr;=lang_en&filter;=0&q;=oumar+ould+hamaha&%5EAssetproxy%28root%2Frfj%2Fdo-not-export%2Funique-to-site%2Fsnippets%2Fsearch-button-english.html%29%3B=Search	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
611,142,887	== You Lied about Me, Don't Do It Again == Jackmcbarn, I never did a thing to you but you lied about me and reported me for vandalism (). I am making a note of you. Do not lie about me again. I will signature this comment when I am able to do so without being reverted by people like you.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	true
611,143,607	== Machida changes == all im asking is you guys sort it out and get rid of the bias. mma is a quasi sport, with a strong commercial and artistic influence, from the largest org, and dana white. the forums are full of shills, and the whole thing is a sham to an extent. the bottom line is there is no service done to truth, in perpetuating the opinions of people like dana, who are irrelevant to decisions and who have no authority, and a vested interest in designed product. dana is bullshit. the shill fake journalists are bullshit. the american popular redneck fans are bullshit. whats real is the event, the scorecard, the judges decision, the weights, etc. its easy to post a ton of sources that refute the passage of machida vs davis as it has stood, but i shouldnt have to. the whole thing should be in a neutral perspective and not trade on bullshit such as danas opinion, 13/13 sites that dont include espn, fight metric being used to justify the assertion that machida outstruck davis (davis landed more blows in the crucial first two rounds), fight metric being used to assert efficiency (no justification is given in the link, just a button promising to do so, which yields nothing). this whole passage of davis vs machida is biased, and subject to the same rampant and ignorant waffle, masquerading as fact, as a mma forum.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,144,411	. : Ah I see it was from a Pitchfork article, sorry I am new to Wikipedia and still learning how to be a real Wikipedia user. Took a class recently in University that taught us to create our own page, so I've only learned the basics. Thanks for bearing with me! I'm not sure where Pitchfork concocted the fact that he was born in '93 but the correct year is 1992. Again, not sure how to actually show them to you in a discreet manner (if you have email I would gladly email them to you), but I can take some SS's of our text conversation to prove what I am saying	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
611,146,992	its factually inaccurate, and biased. it shouldn't be presented like it is, or populated with unsubstantiated, biased assertions as it is.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
611,147,798	` == accurate.. == Machida returned to his native Brazil to face Phil Davis on August 3, 2013 at UFC 163.[44][45] In a unanimous decision, Davis defeated Machida. This caused controversy among many MMA fans. [46][47] In one sample, 13 of 13 media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida. ESPN scored it for Davis. [47] Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, and some moderate GNP, which formed the only significant offense of the fight. Many UFC affiliate bloggers and also scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] UFC promoter Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ``Machida definitely won`` and ``MMA judging sucks``.[50] Fightmetric Analysis shows Davis struck machida more times. [51] ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory scored by the three judges at ringside.[52]. `	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
611,148,698	ps - i dont need new articles, as the articles cited dont add up to the article on wikipedia. there are many simple and obvious issues and problems with the way the thing is typed out. by all means meet me on the talk pages, and explain how 13/13 outlets had machida, but espn does not. explain how dana f white is a neutral or relevant authority on mma judging, or how davis had no significant offence, and machida blocked takedowns, when davis takedowns and gnp is scored and machidas tdd is not. these are facts, not opinion. if you want me to cite the unified rules, and dana white litany of bs- i will happily do so. thanks.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,154,813	* Archive_001 - Page rewritten after a hasty delete.	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
611,207,829	== Review == Hi, I noticed that you are doing a GA review of the parathyroid glands. The biochemistry and physiology of these glands is complicated and I would think that you will need to ask WP:Medicine for support at some stage of the review. Of course, there is nothing wrong with GA reviewers asking for assistance when needed. I would think that the article would need to include an account homeostatic feedback, and also include renal bone disease, primary hyperparathroidism, secondary hyperparathyroidism and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
611,225,346	== pythagoras biography == Pythagoras of Samos was a well-known mathematician, scientist and a religious teacher. He was born in Samos and is often hailed as the first great mathematician. Pythagoras is remembered today for his famous theorem in geometry, the 'Pythagoras Theorem'. His mentors were Thales, Pherekydes and Anaximander, who inspired him to pursue mathematics and astronomy. Pythagoras also made important discoveries in music, astronomy and medicine. He accepted priesthood and performed the rites that were required in order to enter one of the temples in Egypt, known as Diospolis. He set up a brotherhood with some of his followers, who practiced his way of life and pursued his religious ideologies. He became one of the most distinguished teachers of religion in ancient Greece. Read on to know more about the childhood and career of this ancient Greek philosopher and mathematician. Pythagoras was born in the island of Samos in around 569 BC. His father, Mnesarchus, was a merchant and his mother Pythais, was a native of Samos. Young Pythagoras spent most of his early years in Samos but travelled to many places with his father. He was intelligent, well-educated. Pythagoras was also fond of poetry and recited the poems of Homer. Career It is believed that philosophers like Thales, Pherekydes and Anaximander influenced Pythagoras to a great extent when he was young. Thales created a strong impression on him. He contributed to Pythagoras’s interest in astronomy and mathematics. On Thales’s advice, Pythagoras travelled to Egypt and learned a great deal about astronomy and mathematics there. He attended many lectures given by Anaximander, who was Thales’s pupil. Anaximander’s interest in cosmology and geometry influenced Pythagoras to a large extent. In 535 BC, Pythagoras left Samos and went to Egypt when Polycrates, the tyrant of Samos, took control. Pythagoras and Polycrates were believed to be friends at one point of time. There are evidences which suggest that Pythagoras was refrained from entering all temples in Egypt except the temple of Diospolis. He accepted priesthood and was allowed to enter the temple of Diospolis after performing the necessary rituals. He took part in several discussions with the Egyptian priests and embraced the various customs of Egyptian priests such as secrecy, not eating beans and wearing clothes that are not made from animal skins. During his time in Egypt, he pursued his education and specialized in Geometry and Mathematics. When Cambyses II, the king of Persia, invaded Egypt in 525 BC, Pythagoras was made prisoner and was taken to Babylon. On attaining freedom, he left Babylon in 520 BC and returned back to Samos. He then travelled to Crete to study the system of laws. He returned to Samos shortly after that and established a school named the ‘Semicircle’. In 518 BC, Pythagoras left Samos again for Southern Italy. It was in Croton, where he founded a religious school and had several followers who adopted his philosophical principles. He had inner circle of followers known as the ‘Mathematikoi’. Religious Views Pythagoras was famous for his religious teachings and made several contributions to science and religion. Pythagoras’s teachings were centered on the doctrine of metempsychosis. He believed that a person’s soul does not die and is destined to a cycle of rebirths. The soul is freed from the cycle of births only through the purity of its life. His doctrine later came to be known as ‘Pythagoreanism’, which emphasized on esoteric and metaphysical ideologies. Pythagoras and his followers also believed that a soul or spirit lies in all animals and vegetable life. Mathematical Concepts Pythagoras studied properties of numbers and classified them as even numbers, odd numbers, triangular numbers and perfect numbers etc. The ‘Pythagoras theorem’ is one of the earliest theorems in geometry, which states that in right-angle triangles, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of square the other two sides. This theorem was already proposed during the reign of the Babylonian King Hammurabi, but Pythagoras applied it to mathematics and science and refined the concept. Pythagoras also asserted that dynamics of the structure of the universe lies on the interaction of the contraries or the opposites, such as, light and darkness, limited and unlimited, square and oblong, straight and crooked, right and left, singularity and plurality, male and female, motionless and movement and good and bad. Personal Life There are very few records regarding Pythagoras’s personal life. According to some historical accounts, Pythagoras married Theano, who was a native of Croton. He had one son named Telauges and three daughters Myia, Damo and Arignote. Death And Legacy Most of his works were lost throughout the history and very few survived. P	2,014	false	article	random	train	false
611,234,139	*super discussion, respect -	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
611,234,834	`= Review of === * Main reasons for ``No langbox`` seem to be dab pages and redirects to Spurious languages. [No idea yet what to do about these – stand by.] * I suppose you intend to fix the ``One ISO code and mismatching glottocode(s) / Mismatching ISO code / No ISO code`` entries by hand? I don't think a bot could decide which codes are the correct ones. * ``Multiple ISO codes, but no glottocode``: The longest section. The bot could add glottocodes to pages where everything fits together (e.g. lines 136&137 Bobo language: both ISO codes appear in your list under the correct language name, so ``nort2819`` and ``sout2840`` could be added) or even to those where only part of the data fit (e.g. lines 138–40 Bontoc language: add ``cent2083`` and ``cent2292`` but not ``fina1242`` as the corresponding ISO code isn't in the langbox). Don't expect me to code this very quickly. * ``Multiple ISO codes and mismatching, missing or surplus glottocode(s)``: Will filter this section in the next run, i.e. entries where all codes are matching should be removed by the bot. Again, please be patient. ==`	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
611,240,518	` and for ``Libertarian conservatism`` to be included in the list of its ideologies`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,240,617	` == Henley as a source == I've read your Reliable sources comment now, unfortunately it was archived so I will reply here. I don't know how they advertise themselves, and I am pretty sure many reliable sources have catchphrases. They are obviously working for-profit serving as the immigration managing firm for several countries including an EU member Malta. I am mentioning this because somehow that company may have some across as some random little website spamming around with their irrelevant and dubious ``research``. I've seen regular big newspapers citing them quite often. Now as for their methodology, they don't actually do it themselves, you can see the explanation in detail in their report - basically they use open source data provided by IATA to compile this list. IATA builds their database by communicating with national governments. No source is perfect, but there is simply no alternative one. Many countries of the so called third world don't even publish their visa policies anywhere online, literally the only place to find out about their visa policies is through IATA. But IATA doesn't make these tables. Now we do have those tables here ourselves, but counting them up and summarizing may be seen as original research. Therefore it is good to have an external source for this, and I think that is why we can trust that report. Either way, whether we like or whether we don't like some source, is an entirely different question to falsifying data provided by this report. `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
611,263,276	==Very misleading article== This article is extraordinary misleading in whom Niketas Choniates was. He was a top government official for one of the ruling families of Constantinople and the Byzantines - that is his cause for the proximity to the events prior to the 1204 C.E. destruction of Constantinople and his first-hand accounts of all of these events. He is an insider to Byzantine history, but he is a historian after the fact... Did any of the contributors to this article actually read the text that he is famous for writing? It doesn't appear that they have...	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
611,271,512	==Falklands War== You're so right. Isn't all of the World actually owned by the British? Haven't they simply leased back the property rights to the host countries (who are mere occupiers) of the British empire? If a child steals another child's sandwich on a playground, does that mean that the child who stole the sandwich is now the owner of that food? I guess, according to British theories of ownership, that would be true... Thank you for clarifying that...	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
611,271,897	However, that would still not be NPOV	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,272,252	(Neutral Point of View) from an observational perspective.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,276,952	`::I've withdrawn the nomination, as I've seen far worse out there. As suggested at the AfD page, please try to find more sources for the series, if possible and you care that much. Otherwise, it will be nominated again one day, if abandoned. — '''''' `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
611,279,496	:::In Vukovar we had an conclusion, see conversation before with. So, for what?	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
611,281,922	:In lieu of the feminist portal box at the top, I've added the feminist portal bar to the bottom of the article.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
611,284,981	` == Unsourced material == Below material was tagged for needing sources for several months. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. { class=``navbox collapsible `` style=``text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;`` - ! style=``background-color: #CFC;`` Impact - style=``border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; `` Following the decision, online service providers were much less likely to screen content created by users given the court's holding that exercising editorial control could create liability for the content of those posts. In effect, the ruling discouraged family-oriented (or any) sites from screening for offensive content. The decision left service providers with difficult choices between simply accepting the legal liability for content they didn't themselves create or solicit, restricting the speech of their customers (such as filtering messages before making them visible to others), or refraining from moderating even grossly inappropriate content (which the Stratton court thought constituted editorial control). In 1996, Congress effectively reversed this opinion via Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The legislative history specifically says the law was intended to overrule Stratton Oakmont ``and any other similar decisions which have treated providers and users as publishers or speakers of content that is not their own because they have restricted access to objectionable material.`` \|}`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,298,466	` ``single packages or domains`` - domain hasn't been explained. ``Informally, Internet Relay Chat channels...`` - this kind of detail could be trimmed, but if a decent source can be found it would make an interesting addition that says something about the devs.`	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,306,616	*Support per Bejnar & MezzoMezzo	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
611,320,102	Second century Greeks were Romans.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
611,326,161	== Remove Moshe Barazani == He is Hebrew, not Kurdish.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
611,348,292	` == Kindly stop vandalising. == What you had done repeatedly with family names Alempijević et al. is vandalising. As per Category:Redirects_from_surnames redirect ``MAY be used`` if there is only one person with that surname but only if s/he is well known under the surname alone. And even then it does NOT HAVE to be used. In the case of football players, they are certainly not famous enough (and neither is some minor politician being tried) to be considered an exclusive representative of the surname. Family name is a separate entry from these individual people. Family names in various languages do have separate entries. Maybe the article about Ćesarević and Alempijević needs expounding to be a decent article on a family name, but it most certainly does not need to be vandalised with effacing it and redirecting, it is a valid entry as such.`	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	false
611,351,804	Reply Dear McGeddon I have no connection to the person in question. I am an intern at the South Africa arts and culture council, i have been tasked to factually update the wikipedia pages of prominant South African artists. I am confused why you keep changing my hard work. Nothing i am writing is factually incorrect. I understand that my formulation is not 100% but rather than deleting my hard work could you rather help me make corrections. I would really appreciate it!!! This is not a competition, i am only trying to display to the world information that is correct and flattering to promote South Africa artist. Kind Regards Thandi Moyo	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,357,147	I have not edited other articles because you keep changing back my changes and i'm stuck on Mccreedy!!!!! Please can you put it back how it was yesterday and then we can discuss the issues one by one.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,360,096	Thanks Mcgeddon, much appreciated. -)	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
611,363,849	ANTI NORTH EAST INDIA EDITOR	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,370,989	2014 (UTC) ::The cited study has two authors. Why focus your censorship on only one? It wouldn't be because Saint Cast is an academic, would it? 12:18, 3 June	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
611,371,365	2014 (UTC) ::::: A note about criticism and neutrality.... editors are welcome to reference material that praises Piketty as well as criticizes him; that would balance things nicely. 12:22, 3 June	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
611,372,904	, 3 June 2014 (UTC) ::::::: but these are criticisms in general, not of the CitTFCin CitTFC page they would be misplaced. you are welcome to post anti-critical references too! 12:38	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
611,373,018	` *ok Dennis, i would try to convince the the society admin by a last request, as you said earlier ``its not the world end``, lets see what happens and lastly i want to thank-you for your support and guidance, i hope Wikipedia gets more mentors like you. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
611,375,589	` :::You know there is a way around it. Although not on Wikipedia, of course. Have you heard of Wikia? It's a similar site to Wikipedia, created by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. The exception to Wikia is there are no strict policies, and users are allowed to create pages to sure statistics etc. So we'd be able to re-create Eurovision material on there (without sources) and show voting trends. And if people were to google up for voting trends, then the Wikia site would show top of the google list. Here's the website, if you wish to investigate it further. `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
611,376,060	` == Stop and desist from your arbitrary edits! == I have noticed you have willfully cut text from the value-form article because it is not to your taste. A sentence such as ``Thus, Marx aims to provide a brief morphology of the category of economic value as such, from the simplest forms to the money-form.`` is removed with the comment ``synthetsis and bluster``. This is not acceptable, and if you do not desist from your objectionable editing work, action will be taken. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
611,376,122	` == censorship of your talk page is childish, x2 == * ``If you edit my talk page again, I'm going to seek to have you prevented from doing so. Hipocrite (talk) `` plesae do so, I welcome third-party comment on your behaviour. thankfully, you have little control over the 'view history' page, which I'm sure will be viewed by anyone impartial.`	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,376,193	== censorship of your talk page is childish ==	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,376,239	` == gratuitous insults? == you fabricate a charge of ``gratuitous insults`` for what, exactly? * ``Please refrain from engaging in gratuitous insults on my talk page. I did not insult your grasp of the English language. You will refrain from doing so to mine. `` If I had meant to insult you, you would have known it. Please refrain from purple language in the future. == piketty edit == Your attempt to censor valid criticism from the Piketty article is unwelcome and reeks of manipulating consensus. I posted this here because I want it to be known by others who visit your page, so that a file may be built up on your activities, and you can be judged as per your contributions and censorship. You seem to have english as a second language, and may not know that a ``contribution`` generally means an addition, not a removal. Cheers. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
611,376,305	` == your censorship of my criticism of your actions == your censorship of my criticism of your actions (if the 'piketty' section is absent in the future, readers will know what I'm talking about) paints you in a childish light. == piketty edit == Your attempt to censor valid criticism from the Piketty article is unwelcome and reeks of manipulating consensus. I posted this here because I want it to be known by others who visit your page, so that a file may be built up on your activities, and you can be judged as per your contributions and censorship. You seem to have english as a second language, and may not know that a ``contribution`` generally means an addition, not a removal. Cheers. `	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false

610,758,128

` Per WP:BLPREMOVE: ``Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced; that is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see No original research); that relies on self-published sources, unless written by the subject of the BLP (see below); or that relies on sources that fail in some other way to meet Verifiability standards.`` :The first Cosmo article relies on the Daily Mirror which is not a RS and is qualified as follows: ``Rumoured love``, ``alleged actress girlfriend``, ``Rumours first surfaced...``, and ``rumoured romance``. The second Cosmo article is qualified as follows: ``apparently breaks up``, ``It looks like``, ``It seems``, ``Apparently it was``, ``Despite rumours``. :It doesn't matter what the publication is, this is tabloid gossip and doesn't belong on Wikipedia per WP:NOTGOSSIP: ``content hosted in Wikipedia is not for: Scandal mongering, promoting things 'heard through the grapevine' or gossiping. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy.`` `

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

610,763,361

And more star wars=== I feel that since it is not an official or recognized holiday except by those who love it, and the fact there is no real purpose other than for the previously stated reasons, it should not be added as a holiday. It is declared by many sources it is an unofficial holiday. An unofficial payday is not a payday. An unofficial holiday is not a holiday. =

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

610,766,052

. ::: QG is indeed an active medical editor, but also one of the most controversial, to the point where I often stay away from articles he edits, which are often my favorite topics, the ones in which I'm a recognized expert in the real world. It's simply impossible to communicate effectively with him. He has a de facto IDHT, very tendentious, form of communication, and merely repeats claims and his own ideas, without addressing the concerns brought up by other editors. That he is usually defending and promoting a scientific skepticism POV (which is usually the same as the mainstream scientific and medical POV) is fine, but collaboration is essential, and his communication needs to be vastly improved. He only gets truly communicative when he's being threatened with a block, and then he suddenly will bend and bow and cooperate to the nth degree, but that stops when he's back into safe territory. When such an editor keeps me from editing my favorite topics, then you know something's really wrong. He gives skeptics a bad name. He has also been known to go on rampages through articles, doing exactly the opposite of what he usually does, supporting fringe POV and destroying mainstream content, the type he usually adds to articles. It's been a while since he did this, but it's been known to happen, making one wonder what type of mind we're dealing with. Wikipedia would be better off without him. A thorough CU would bring to light some astounding things.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

610,779,592

::::I am not a professor of Thai politics, either; but there are professors (or assistant professors, or lecturers, their actual academic title is not that important) of Thai politics who have published their observations and analysis of the current conflict. Several are already linked in the article (Pavin, McCargo, Montesano, Nelson, Ukrist), we could add many more (Pasuk & Baker, Connors, Thitinan, ...) Each of them has their own thoughts and explanations of what is behind this crisis, including social conflict (lower/lower-middle class vs. upper-middle/upper class), regional conflict (North/Northeast vs. South; or capital vs. periphery), economic interests, and also succession (at least mentioned by Pavin and Thitinan; I think it is not that important what journalists say, scholars are better qualified to analyse the political/social/economic/cultural... backgrounds). In my opinion it is problematic to only mention one theory of what is the background of this conflict in the lead section, and neglect the other reasons that are discussed by high-profile analysts as well. This would be selective and unbalanced in my view. I would rather have a separate section in which all potential causes of the conflict can be discussed, mentioning which author(s) represent them (and, if any, which author(s) reject them). If we discuss all potential reasons that are contributed to the debate by any analyst in the lead section, the lead will be huge. And this could daunt readers rather than inviting them to continue reading.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

610,780,034

==In defense of the old portrait== It is a pity that, having so many portraits of Peter III, the article is illustrated by a coin. The coin is contemporaneous, but the portrait is simple and non descriptive. However, the portrait of the Nuova Cronica is more adequate. Offers an image of the King, is the most old portrait of him in Commons (was painted only two or three decades after his death) and has resemblance to the true face of the King (recently reconstruced by computer using his skull) and shows real characteristics of his appearance (Peter III dyed his hair to blonde, which justifies that in the portrait the king appears with blond hair and brown beard).

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

610,809,720

Could be any king of any time, the picture doesn't even have a beard, unlike Peter III). If the coin were the only visual material Commons, ok, but it is not.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

610,825,918

` == Rise of E-Cig use and fall of tobacco use == @DocJames: I'm a little bit confused... You've changend my contribution in that way, that only the rise of E-Cig use is left over. You have written yesterday: ``One also needs to look at if they decrease cig usage or increase cig use in society as a whole.`` So: Why do you delete a contribution, that is dealing precisely with that topic? `

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

610,845,328

` == Gotcha! == An artist who likes using the names of his creations as his pseudonymns. ``...Every night at the stroke of midnight, the master turns into a screaming, maniacal, demonic, raging, bloodlusting animal!`` ``And then I get mean!`` -Vincent Price :You think it's funny? Actually, it's sad...but that's a concept not part of your brain...that's EVEN MORE SAD. :Your drawings look like those of an underdeveloped mind, like from a child. It perfectly fits!! And I also love your friends for having great realism implanted in their small brains: http://www.orionsarm.com/ (ZERO ideas, just describing the real world, that's creative undershit, hahahahaha) :You, my dear friend, are genetic crap and you know it. Beside that, I know 7 billions that would love to kill asses like you. Go home and never come back...we won't miss you! Noooo, there is no real love for you, you took the wrong junction at the last galaxy, void-head. So now go f*u*c*k your inborn BLINDERS in front of your head, thanks! `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

610,846,933

==Category:Members of paramilitary and terrorist organizations== :Category:Members of paramilitary and terrorist organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

610,864,192

` == Vandalize?! == I would have ignored your message normally (and by ignore I mean let you live), but why on earth would you call my edit ``vandalize`` while it obviously was not? I merely added a category that I thought was appropriate with absolutely no intent to ``vandalize``. You could've said it was something you don't agree with, or even something that most people who edit here don't agree with. You could've directed your ``warning`` at my (very real) threat. Like ``the next time you threaten someone``. Call me what you want, but I'm not a petty ``vandalizer``. I usually feel lazy to cross international lines to do just one thing, but I'm glad to tell you that you've signed your own death warrant and as long as you and the guy who reverted it are in the same country, both of you can look forward to a painful death very shortly. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

610,873,652

== Question == Hi,I was just wondering if this season was still on

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

610,878,206

Thanks so much for the warm welcome !

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

610,882,543

` - lol - I don't know maybe she wants it to be a secret like some actresses but her admiring fans need to know ;) haha ya I just love that name `` Hesione Hushabye `` cheers `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

610,895,115

:AP is still undivided, you have already agreed to wait till June 2nd, let us leave this issue here. Both of us needs to contribute to wiki, reverting will be loss to you and me as well. Let's concentrate on other topics to help improve wiki. If you have any comments talk back.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

610,906,640

REDIRECT Talk:Tana River cisticola

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

610,922,375

How do I do that?

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

610,967,606

2014 (UTC) ==Objection to removal of text in real prices and ideal prices article== I object strongly that you have removed chunks of text, without proper explanation and discussion of your reasons, in the real prices and ideal prices article. It seems as though you are on an ideological campaign to cut stuff out of articles which you happen to think is rubbish. You have to prove it is rubbish, not simply autocratically remove material because it doesn't fit with your ideology. You are not an expert on this topic, so tread carefully and discuss your proposed changes. 19:14, 31 May

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

610,967,863

==Objection to removal of text in real prices and ideal prices article== I object strongly that you have removed chunks of text, without proper explanation and discussion of your reasons, in the real prices and ideal prices article. It seems as though you are on an ideological campaign to cut stuff out of articles which you happen to think is rubbish. You have to prove it is rubbish, not simply autocratically remove material because it doesn't fit with your ideology. You are not an expert on this topic, so tread carefully and discuss your proposed changes.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

610,978,957

::Great discussion point Jimbo, although I don't think discussion is actually required, the foundation should be able to just do this without the support of the users that are disputing the edits. In really difficult disputed issues I agree the wikimedia Foundation could hire experienced editors, although I wouldn't support any wikipedia connected interviewers, use and pay someone totally independent - independent notable reporters to interview and report on the problematic content issue and report that in a wp:rs source thus giving full independent closure to the dispute.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

610,983,830

If you leave me a message here, I will ignore it and delete it. I do not care what you have to say.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

610,985,440

Screw you.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

true

610,986,434

You're a fucking retard.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

610,997,130

It is clear to me you have read things out of context. Are you aare that I am emailing all stewards and oversight to correct an issue corporate has been grappling with for 3 years? I've been emailing Sue Gardner and Jimmy. I am very busy with this page, and yes, if you had read the content and will return tomorrow, you'll see whatthe steward and oversight and Jimmy and Sue are waiting to see... the solution to the problem of attrition - new user attrition - you know... people like me. If the block isn't lifted then your co-founder, your CEO, every steward and every mmber of oversight will not get what I've promised them. And the refferences to legal ARE the issue. It's a public arena in which WP invites members to defame the character of other users. The users who do it are violating federal law. I've come up ith the solution and you've just blocked it,. If you can't take the time to read through the materials, verify the email I've sent and study the history, and you don't remove the block, then I am left with no alternative save to repost this message with a template summons to Sue - something like [<== intentioinally wrong this time - and sorry to be so brazen but I am already 50 mins late with this.]] so you don't make me look like a fool. Thank you.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

610,997,326

Wait a minute... your name is Panda and you think it's offensive to give people animal refferences?] Inciddntally I am only about 7 weeks old. Jimmy thinks you should not be biting me.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

610,997,540

Wait another minute... I just read wwhere these cited violations are meant to be preventative; not punitive.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,004,531

` : Courtesy message to those whom I wish to acknowledge as model Admins; some good (TenofAllTrades); some not (Panda)... yet, and speak with for the report... I guess that will be in 60 hours or so... I wish someone like would take the time to do their due diligence and see what it is I am doing for WMF... I am not wound up. I am 2 hours late on my report to corporate OUR CORPORATE! Read below, please and research if you mut. I restored the block because he added depth to the report, but that didn't help this situation one bit. - Thanks. Dr. Original Message Subject: Am working on a project for Sue Gardner/Stewards and Advisory Board Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:14:21 -0400 From: Matt To: wikien-bureaucrats@lists.wikimedia.org CC: Matt H I've been in communication with them all and was completing an email to Jimmy Wales re the report (it is about, ironically Admin abuse of power, the culture within, and the source of the attrition issues facing WMF for the past 3 years). In short THEY (formerly YOU) set an example of bullying behavior. That's not important. . Part of the research process requires me to invoke the best and worst behavior in order to have data for the study. DangerousPanda just blocked me for 60 hours and I have been keeping Sue, Jimmy, the Stewards and Oversight up to date... I had a report due into them over 90 mins ago. What am I going to do now? HELP! Thanks Dr. Matt Hogendobler User:PresidentistVB P. S. He's bragging about it in the Admin noticeboards group. Fortunately for him, there's another admin with some sense to share with him. This is perfect data! But I am still in jail and I don't dare call Sue on a Sunday. :* He cannot; he's been blocked (by me) for a whole whackload of reasons that are painfully obvious to all :: ...and he's removed his block notice. I'll let someone else take care of that ::: Er, lest there be any confusion or misunderstanding, blocked users are free to remove block notices from their own talk pages. There is no requirement that they wear a scarlet letter for the duration of their block, so for the moment there is nothing to ``take care of``. Encouraging someone else to go to his talk page and replace the block notice is just poking the bear. (And it's pretty obvious that this particular editor is already more than sufficiently wound up....) :::A problem only arises if a blocked editor removes notices related to his or her block and then requests unblocking—the concern in such a situation is that an editor may be attempting to conceal or mislead regarding the reasons for their block. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,010,539

took the changes not to be good faith edits. However, I've since found that different publications vary on this, with either date listed. I will look further, then footnote this in the article.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

611,030,815

== A page you started (List of U.S. cities with large Cambodian-American populations) has been reviewed! == Thanks for creating List of U.S. cities with large Cambodian-American populations, Cyanidethistles! Wikipedia editor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: Creative! To reply, leave a comment on OccultZone's . Learn more about page curation.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

611,040,082

== Correction re. cast iron == I want to tell you personally (just in case you missed looking at the ref desk) that I was WRONG re. the point where a binary iron-carbon system goes from iron-cementite to iron-graphite I said the transition point is at about 2% carbon, but in fact it NEVER transitions to iron-graphite unless silicon is added as an alloying element. My apologies,

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,045,956

The way psychiatrists have been plotting against the Church of Scientology to prevent The Tech from working and prevent man from getting real gains deserves mention here.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

611,056,834

== Proposed deletion of Muggle Quidditch Nederland == Hello, Danachos. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Muggle Quidditch Nederland, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted: # edit the page # remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} # save the page Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway. You can leave a note on if you have questions.

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

611,060,773

:::These are primary sources and they are OK for plot sections, but not for marketing.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,061,898

` And, can I ask, when were you elected spokesman for ``every reputable historian on the planet``? `

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

611,062,928

` == Your submission at AfC Amihahi Grosz was accepted == Amihahi Grosz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! '''''' `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

611,075,300

They are known as Palestinian because of Arab propaganda. Real Palestinians are Jews. Arab Palestinians are frauds from Arabia.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

611,078,204

== I hope you like what you started == I shouldn't have been banned. That was a complete abuse and utter bullshit. I hope you like the disruption you have caused to the project. My ban needs to be overturned so I can stop advocating for it to be undone. You guys took a dedicated editor and me out of the project just so you could keep pushing POV and free the admins to be abusive. I hope your happy. When my ban is overturned I'll walk away. But until then I a never going to stop commenting because it was abusive and never should have been allowed. Kumioko

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,078,286

== Me ban == I shouldn't have been banned. That was a complete abuse and utter bullshit. I hope you like the disruption you have caused to the project. My ban needs to be overturned so I can stop advocating for it to be undone. You guys took a dedicated editor and me out of the project just so you could keep pushing POV and free the admins to be abusive. I hope your happy. When my ban is overturned I'll walk away. But until then I a never going to stop commenting because it was abusive and never should have been allowed. Kumioko

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

611,081,013

P.S. I found out about your work after having the interview highlighted to me at wmuk:Engine room#BBC article - Wikipedia and health.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

611,084,563

== Karrine_Steffans == https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karrine_Steffans&diff;=prev&oldid;=611059275 hello there, I had to take down two of your stories. I was speculating as to why you wrote them, did you have wp:rs writing that she was African American? if so please link a dink me to them, ta

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

611,085,426

from 10 December 2013 - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karrine_Steffans&diff;=585481289&oldid;=585411129 -

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,088,018

== Infobox == Just of a note people, I might be changing the infobox to make it resemble to one on the Arabs article, and try to include a couple ancient and medieval Arab Christians, and Arab Christians from each nation. Isaac of Nineveh can fit both an ancient Arab Christian and representative of Bahrain. PacificWarrior101

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

611,112,272

:: How long do you think it's gonna take to update these things?

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

611,114,547

I'll block Excirial! He blocked me!

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,115,228

== Not African American == Do not write a story that she is African American http://bossip.com/888858/karrine-superhead-steffans-explains-slavery-comments-every-brown-person-is-not-the-same/

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

611,116,197

== 1964: Space Edition on 06/04/2014 == I love making this series, but I didn't get any barnstars because I didn't make it up the rank unless I get my Content Review Medal and my Gold WikiAward.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

611,122,592

== yo == davis v machida is full of shit. im changing it again. how about wikipedia concern itself with facts and not nut hugging.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

true

611,122,879

== STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

611,123,636

` Machida returned to his native Brazil to face Phil Davis on August 3, 2013 at UFC 163.[44][45] In a unanimous result, Davis defeated Machida via decision.[46][47] 13 of 13 ufc media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida.[47] Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, after neither fighter was able to mount any significant offense. Davis mounted significant offense, as it won him the fight. ESPN scored for Davis. Many UFC shills with hall passes that could be taken away and votes on the ufc rankings, but zero in the way of journalistic credentials of any discernible pedigree in journalism scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] UFC promoter, sport hater, and just bleed advocate, Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ``Machida definitely won`` and ``MMA judging sucks``.[50] Fightmetric Analysis supports this, showing that Machida outstruck Phil Davis, and neutralized 80% of Davis' takedown attempts, with a significantly higher efficiency rating through all three rounds.[51] ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory for davis. theres the truth. i challenge any man, woman or trans to dispute one word of it. wikilies has taken the place of a once great outlet for truth.`

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

611,123,922

(and zero explanation of how this was arrived at)

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

611,125,432

` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

611,125,934

` In a unanimous result, - result is determined by judges not opinions of drunk fans. result wasnt controversial, it was unanimous. Davis defeated Machida via decision.[46][47] 13 of 13 ufc media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida. - espn scored for davis. the shills listed are all ufc affiliates and have zero journalistic credentials or pretense of neutrality. Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, after neither fighter was able to mount any significant offense. Davis mounted significant offense, as it won him the fight. - self explanatory. davis won the fight from his offense, and in a sport, that is significant. ESPN scored for Davis. Many UFC shills with hall passes that could be taken away and votes on the ufc rankings, but zero in the way of journalistic credentials of any discernible pedigree in journalism scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] - self explanatory UFC promoter, sport hater, and just bleed advocate, Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ``Machida definitely won`` and ``MMA judging sucks``.[50] - dana is neither neutral, nor trustworthy, nor an authority on mma scoring. he went on to complain about the hendricks v gsp fight saying its about damage. its not about damage. therefore the man is a liar or an ass. he didnt make the unified rules, has a detailed history of sport hating and attacking judges at all opportunity. he has waged a campaign of journalist tampering and is known for hating elements of the sport, he supposedly champions. Fightmetric Analysis shows davis landed more strikes in round 1 2 and over all, and neutralized 80% of Davis' takedown attempts (something not scored in mma), with a significantly higher efficiency rating (and zero explanation of how this was arrived at) through all three rounds.[51] - facts. and the efficiency thing has zero credence, as the site linked has zero explanation attacked for how it arrived at its conclusion. click the explanation button and nothing comes up. ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory for davis.`

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

611,126,485

` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. Please, undo the damage you are doing to Wikipedia, stop doing more damage, and I will have no reason to leave any more messages on your talk page.`

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

611,126,945

` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. Please, undo the damage you are doing to Wikipedia, stop doing more damage, and I will have no reason to leave any more messages on your talk page. If you think you are right, stop blocking me, removing my edits, and prove me wrong! Like this, you are just showing you are arogant and don't stand criticism of what you are doing!`

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

611,128,396

` == STOP VANDALIZING == Please stop your disruptive editing, and removing corrections to the unreliable and biased sources! If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population, I will have to ask for an arbitration, for examining of your access rights, as well as to ask for protection of freedom and truth by blocking you from further editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by : The bats are out today. This must be the record for shortest time between visits by looney editors. Please, undo the damage you are doing to Wikipedia, stop doing more damage, and I will have no reason to leave any more messages on your talk page. If you think you are right, stop blocking me, removing my edits, and prove me wrong! Like this, you are just showing you are arrogant and don't stand criticism of what you are doing! You are just a petty person! You can't win the argument, so you are eliminating the other side in the talk! Go ahead, block me! But that won't change the fact that you are abusing the powers given to you, and you don't stand criticism! So go ahead, abuse your powers again.`

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

true

611,130,406

:Indeed. And according to the analysis of the statistical expert appointed to assess the Stargate investigations, RV functioning was definitively established in that investigation. Sceptic Hyman agreed that he could not find a flaw, and had content himself with saying 'I am not convinced there isn't a problem, the universal 'get out of jail free' card. Anyway, this is a fruitless argument and I'm going to uncheck 'watch this page'.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,130,734

i just took out a bunch of Grana refs - the Health section was overcited and overdetailed on the variability issue

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,134,202

I stand by all the corrections I made, and all the criticism I direct at you! And it is YOU who is continuing the edit-warring, by reverting without an explanation the corrections I made, in order to improve the truthfulness of information presented on Wikipedia. Yet, instead of supporting me in that effort, you keep blocking me, removing my corrections and reverting to the biased and incorrect information. Since you call it like that - edit-warring, I will remind you that for any war you need two sides. Have you examined the moves of the other side in this alleged edit-warring? I strongly doubt it, because you sided with that side, and took part in edit-warring. Is that what you are supposed to do?

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

611,136,253

== Göttinger Hainbund == There are similarities to the contemporary German 'Göttinger Hainbund'.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

611,141,481

== Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2014 == Bowe Bergdahl was released in a prisoner exchange yesterday. Can someone please remove him from the missing captured section? There are no more MIAs.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

611,141,952

Ok, he's been removed from the search engine but his poster is now archived like Bin Laden. I apologize for doubting you. Hamaha is 100% dead. http://search.state.gov/search?site=rfj_en_rfj&client;=rfj_en_rfj&output;=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet;=rfj_en_rfj&ie;=utf8&oe;=utf8&lr;=lang_en&filter;=0&q;=oumar+ould+hamaha&%5EAssetproxy%28root%2Frfj%2Fdo-not-export%2Funique-to-site%2Fsnippets%2Fsearch-button-english.html%29%3B=Search

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

611,142,887

== You Lied about Me, Don't Do It Again == Jackmcbarn, I never did a thing to you but you lied about me and reported me for vandalism (). I am making a note of you. Do not lie about me again. I will signature this comment when I am able to do so without being reverted by people like you.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

true

611,143,607

== Machida changes == all im asking is you guys sort it out and get rid of the bias. mma is a quasi sport, with a strong commercial and artistic influence, from the largest org, and dana white. the forums are full of shills, and the whole thing is a sham to an extent. the bottom line is there is no service done to truth, in perpetuating the opinions of people like dana, who are irrelevant to decisions and who have no authority, and a vested interest in designed product. dana is bullshit. the shill fake journalists are bullshit. the american popular redneck fans are bullshit. whats real is the event, the scorecard, the judges decision, the weights, etc. its easy to post a ton of sources that refute the passage of machida vs davis as it has stood, but i shouldnt have to. the whole thing should be in a neutral perspective and not trade on bullshit such as danas opinion, 13/13 sites that dont include espn, fight metric being used to justify the assertion that machida outstruck davis (davis landed more blows in the crucial first two rounds), fight metric being used to assert efficiency (no justification is given in the link, just a button promising to do so, which yields nothing). this whole passage of davis vs machida is biased, and subject to the same rampant and ignorant waffle, masquerading as fact, as a mma forum.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,144,411

. : Ah I see it was from a Pitchfork article, sorry I am new to Wikipedia and still learning how to be a real Wikipedia user. Took a class recently in University that taught us to create our own page, so I've only learned the basics. Thanks for bearing with me! I'm not sure where Pitchfork concocted the fact that he was born in '93 but the correct year is 1992. Again, not sure how to actually show them to you in a discreet manner (if you have email I would gladly email them to you), but I can take some SS's of our text conversation to prove what I am saying

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

611,146,992

its factually inaccurate, and biased. it shouldn't be presented like it is, or populated with unsubstantiated, biased assertions as it is.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

611,147,798

` == accurate.. == Machida returned to his native Brazil to face Phil Davis on August 3, 2013 at UFC 163.[44][45] In a unanimous decision, Davis defeated Machida. This caused controversy among many MMA fans. [46][47] In one sample, 13 of 13 media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida. ESPN scored it for Davis. [47] Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, and some moderate GNP, which formed the only significant offense of the fight. Many UFC affiliate bloggers and also scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] UFC promoter Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ``Machida definitely won`` and ``MMA judging sucks``.[50] Fightmetric Analysis shows Davis struck machida more times. [51] ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory scored by the three judges at ringside.[52]. `

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

611,148,698

ps - i dont need new articles, as the articles cited dont add up to the article on wikipedia. there are many simple and obvious issues and problems with the way the thing is typed out. by all means meet me on the talk pages, and explain how 13/13 outlets had machida, but espn does not. explain how dana f white is a neutral or relevant authority on mma judging, or how davis had no significant offence, and machida blocked takedowns, when davis takedowns and gnp is scored and machidas tdd is not. these are facts, not opinion. if you want me to cite the unified rules, and dana white litany of bs- i will happily do so. thanks.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,154,813

* Archive_001 - Page rewritten after a hasty delete.

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

611,207,829

== Review == Hi, I noticed that you are doing a GA review of the parathyroid glands. The biochemistry and physiology of these glands is complicated and I would think that you will need to ask WP:Medicine for support at some stage of the review. Of course, there is nothing wrong with GA reviewers asking for assistance when needed. I would think that the article would need to include an account homeostatic feedback, and also include renal bone disease, primary hyperparathroidism, secondary hyperparathyroidism and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

611,225,346

== pythagoras biography == Pythagoras of Samos was a well-known mathematician, scientist and a religious teacher. He was born in Samos and is often hailed as the first great mathematician. Pythagoras is remembered today for his famous theorem in geometry, the 'Pythagoras Theorem'. His mentors were Thales, Pherekydes and Anaximander, who inspired him to pursue mathematics and astronomy. Pythagoras also made important discoveries in music, astronomy and medicine. He accepted priesthood and performed the rites that were required in order to enter one of the temples in Egypt, known as Diospolis. He set up a brotherhood with some of his followers, who practiced his way of life and pursued his religious ideologies. He became one of the most distinguished teachers of religion in ancient Greece. Read on to know more about the childhood and career of this ancient Greek philosopher and mathematician. Pythagoras was born in the island of Samos in around 569 BC. His father, Mnesarchus, was a merchant and his mother Pythais, was a native of Samos. Young Pythagoras spent most of his early years in Samos but travelled to many places with his father. He was intelligent, well-educated. Pythagoras was also fond of poetry and recited the poems of Homer. Career It is believed that philosophers like Thales, Pherekydes and Anaximander influenced Pythagoras to a great extent when he was young. Thales created a strong impression on him. He contributed to Pythagoras’s interest in astronomy and mathematics. On Thales’s advice, Pythagoras travelled to Egypt and learned a great deal about astronomy and mathematics there. He attended many lectures given by Anaximander, who was Thales’s pupil. Anaximander’s interest in cosmology and geometry influenced Pythagoras to a large extent. In 535 BC, Pythagoras left Samos and went to Egypt when Polycrates, the tyrant of Samos, took control. Pythagoras and Polycrates were believed to be friends at one point of time. There are evidences which suggest that Pythagoras was refrained from entering all temples in Egypt except the temple of Diospolis. He accepted priesthood and was allowed to enter the temple of Diospolis after performing the necessary rituals. He took part in several discussions with the Egyptian priests and embraced the various customs of Egyptian priests such as secrecy, not eating beans and wearing clothes that are not made from animal skins. During his time in Egypt, he pursued his education and specialized in Geometry and Mathematics. When Cambyses II, the king of Persia, invaded Egypt in 525 BC, Pythagoras was made prisoner and was taken to Babylon. On attaining freedom, he left Babylon in 520 BC and returned back to Samos. He then travelled to Crete to study the system of laws. He returned to Samos shortly after that and established a school named the ‘Semicircle’. In 518 BC, Pythagoras left Samos again for Southern Italy. It was in Croton, where he founded a religious school and had several followers who adopted his philosophical principles. He had inner circle of followers known as the ‘Mathematikoi’. Religious Views Pythagoras was famous for his religious teachings and made several contributions to science and religion. Pythagoras’s teachings were centered on the doctrine of metempsychosis. He believed that a person’s soul does not die and is destined to a cycle of rebirths. The soul is freed from the cycle of births only through the purity of its life. His doctrine later came to be known as ‘Pythagoreanism’, which emphasized on esoteric and metaphysical ideologies. Pythagoras and his followers also believed that a soul or spirit lies in all animals and vegetable life. Mathematical Concepts Pythagoras studied properties of numbers and classified them as even numbers, odd numbers, triangular numbers and perfect numbers etc. The ‘Pythagoras theorem’ is one of the earliest theorems in geometry, which states that in right-angle triangles, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of square the other two sides. This theorem was already proposed during the reign of the Babylonian King Hammurabi, but Pythagoras applied it to mathematics and science and refined the concept. Pythagoras also asserted that dynamics of the structure of the universe lies on the interaction of the contraries or the opposites, such as, light and darkness, limited and unlimited, square and oblong, straight and crooked, right and left, singularity and plurality, male and female, motionless and movement and good and bad. Personal Life There are very few records regarding Pythagoras’s personal life. According to some historical accounts, Pythagoras married Theano, who was a native of Croton. He had one son named Telauges and three daughters Myia, Damo and Arignote. Death And Legacy Most of his works were lost throughout the history and very few survived. P

2,014

false

article

random

train

false

611,234,139

*super discussion, respect -

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

611,234,834

`= Review of === * Main reasons for ``No langbox`` seem to be dab pages and redirects to Spurious languages. [No idea yet what to do about these – stand by.] * I suppose you intend to fix the ``One ISO code and mismatching glottocode(s) / Mismatching ISO code / No ISO code`` entries by hand? I don't think a bot could decide which codes are the correct ones. * ``Multiple ISO codes, but no glottocode``: The longest section. The bot could add glottocodes to pages where everything fits together (e.g. lines 136&137 Bobo language: both ISO codes appear in your list under the correct language name, so ``nort2819`` and ``sout2840`` could be added) or even to those where only part of the data fit (e.g. lines 138–40 Bontoc language: add ``cent2083`` and ``cent2292`` but not ``fina1242`` as the corresponding ISO code isn't in the langbox). Don't expect me to code this very quickly. * ``Multiple ISO codes and mismatching, missing or surplus glottocode(s)``: Will filter this section in the next run, i.e. entries where all codes are matching should be removed by the bot. Again, please be patient. ==`

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

611,240,518

` and for ``Libertarian conservatism`` to be included in the list of its ideologies`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,240,617

` == Henley as a source == I've read your Reliable sources comment now, unfortunately it was archived so I will reply here. I don't know how they advertise themselves, and I am pretty sure many reliable sources have catchphrases. They are obviously working for-profit serving as the immigration managing firm for several countries including an EU member Malta. I am mentioning this because somehow that company may have some across as some random little website spamming around with their irrelevant and dubious ``research``. I've seen regular big newspapers citing them quite often. Now as for their methodology, they don't actually do it themselves, you can see the explanation in detail in their report - basically they use open source data provided by IATA to compile this list. IATA builds their database by communicating with national governments. No source is perfect, but there is simply no alternative one. Many countries of the so called third world don't even publish their visa policies anywhere online, literally the only place to find out about their visa policies is through IATA. But IATA doesn't make these tables. Now we do have those tables here ourselves, but counting them up and summarizing may be seen as original research. Therefore it is good to have an external source for this, and I think that is why we can trust that report. Either way, whether we like or whether we don't like some source, is an entirely different question to falsifying data provided by this report. `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

611,263,276

==Very misleading article== This article is extraordinary misleading in whom Niketas Choniates was. He was a top government official for one of the ruling families of Constantinople and the Byzantines - that is his cause for the proximity to the events prior to the 1204 C.E. destruction of Constantinople and his first-hand accounts of all of these events. He is an insider to Byzantine history, but he is a historian after the fact... Did any of the contributors to this article actually read the text that he is famous for writing? It doesn't appear that they have...

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

611,271,512

==Falklands War== You're so right. Isn't all of the World actually owned by the British? Haven't they simply leased back the property rights to the host countries (who are mere occupiers) of the British empire? If a child steals another child's sandwich on a playground, does that mean that the child who stole the sandwich is now the owner of that food? I guess, according to British theories of ownership, that would be true... Thank you for clarifying that...

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

611,271,897

However, that would still not be NPOV

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,272,252

(Neutral Point of View) from an observational perspective.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,276,952

`::I've withdrawn the nomination, as I've seen far worse out there. As suggested at the AfD page, please try to find more sources for the series, if possible and you care that much. Otherwise, it will be nominated again one day, if abandoned. — '''''' `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

611,279,496

:::In Vukovar we had an conclusion, see conversation before with. So, for what?

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

611,281,922

:In lieu of the feminist portal box at the top, I've added the feminist portal bar to the bottom of the article.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

611,284,981

` == Unsourced material == Below material was tagged for needing sources for several months. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. { class=``navbox collapsible `` style=``text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;`` - ! style=``background-color: #CFC;`` Impact - style=``border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; `` Following the decision, online service providers were much less likely to screen content created by users given the court's holding that exercising editorial control could create liability for the content of those posts. In effect, the ruling discouraged family-oriented (or any) sites from screening for offensive content. The decision left service providers with difficult choices between simply accepting the legal liability for content they didn't themselves create or solicit, restricting the speech of their customers (such as filtering messages before making them visible to others), or refraining from moderating even grossly inappropriate content (which the Stratton court thought constituted editorial control). In 1996, Congress effectively reversed this opinion via Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The legislative history specifically says the law was intended to overrule Stratton Oakmont ``and any other similar decisions which have treated providers and users as publishers or speakers of content that is not their own because they have restricted access to objectionable material.`` |}`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,298,466

` *``single packages or domains`` - domain hasn't been explained. *``Informally, Internet Relay Chat channels...`` - this kind of detail could be trimmed, but if a decent source can be found it would make an interesting addition that says something about the devs.`

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,306,616

*Support per Bejnar & MezzoMezzo

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

611,320,102

Second century Greeks were Romans.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

611,326,161

== Remove Moshe Barazani == He is Hebrew, not Kurdish.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

611,348,292

` == Kindly stop vandalising. == What you had done repeatedly with family names Alempijević et al. is vandalising. As per Category:Redirects_from_surnames redirect ``MAY be used`` if there is only one person with that surname but only if s/he is well known under the surname alone. And even then it does NOT HAVE to be used. In the case of football players, they are certainly not famous enough (and neither is some minor politician being tried) to be considered an exclusive representative of the surname. Family name is a separate entry from these individual people. Family names in various languages do have separate entries. Maybe the article about Ćesarević and Alempijević needs expounding to be a decent article on a family name, but it most certainly does not need to be vandalised with effacing it and redirecting, it is a valid entry as such.`

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

false

611,351,804

Reply Dear McGeddon I have no connection to the person in question. I am an intern at the South Africa arts and culture council, i have been tasked to factually update the wikipedia pages of prominant South African artists. I am confused why you keep changing my hard work. Nothing i am writing is factually incorrect. I understand that my formulation is not 100% but rather than deleting my hard work could you rather help me make corrections. I would really appreciate it!!! This is not a competition, i am only trying to display to the world information that is correct and flattering to promote South Africa artist. Kind Regards Thandi Moyo

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,357,147

I have not edited other articles because you keep changing back my changes and i'm stuck on Mccreedy!!!!! Please can you put it back how it was yesterday and then we can discuss the issues one by one.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,360,096

Thanks Mcgeddon, much appreciated. -)

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

611,363,849

ANTI NORTH EAST INDIA EDITOR

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,370,989

2014 (UTC) ::The cited study has two authors. Why focus your censorship on only one? It wouldn't be because Saint Cast is an academic, would it? 12:18, 3 June

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

611,371,365

2014 (UTC) ::::: A note about criticism and neutrality.... editors are welcome to reference material that praises Piketty as well as criticizes him; that would balance things nicely. 12:22, 3 June

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

611,372,904

, 3 June 2014 (UTC) ::::::: but these are criticisms in general, not of the CitTFCin CitTFC page they would be misplaced. you are welcome to post anti-critical references too! 12:38

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

611,373,018

` *ok Dennis, i would try to convince the the society admin by a last request, as you said earlier ``its not the world end``, lets see what happens and lastly i want to thank-you for your support and guidance, i hope Wikipedia gets more mentors like you. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

611,375,589

` :::You know there is a way around it. Although not on Wikipedia, of course. Have you heard of Wikia? It's a similar site to Wikipedia, created by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. The exception to Wikia is there are no strict policies, and users are allowed to create pages to sure statistics etc. So we'd be able to re-create Eurovision material on there (without sources) and show voting trends. And if people were to google up for voting trends, then the Wikia site would show top of the google list. Here's the website, if you wish to investigate it further. `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

611,376,060

` == Stop and desist from your arbitrary edits! == I have noticed you have willfully cut text from the value-form article because it is not to your taste. A sentence such as ``Thus, Marx aims to provide a brief morphology of the category of economic value as such, from the simplest forms to the money-form.`` is removed with the comment ``synthetsis and bluster``. This is not acceptable, and if you do not desist from your objectionable editing work, action will be taken. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

611,376,122

` == censorship of your talk page is childish, x2 == * ``If you edit my talk page again, I'm going to seek to have you prevented from doing so. Hipocrite (talk) `` plesae do so, I welcome third-party comment on your behaviour. thankfully, you have little control over the 'view history' page, which I'm sure will be viewed by anyone impartial.`

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,376,193

== censorship of your talk page is childish ==

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,376,239

` == gratuitous insults? == you fabricate a charge of ``gratuitous insults`` for what, exactly? * ``Please refrain from engaging in gratuitous insults on my talk page. I did not insult your grasp of the English language. You will refrain from doing so to mine. `` If I had meant to insult you, you would have known it. Please refrain from purple language in the future. == piketty edit == Your attempt to censor valid criticism from the Piketty article is unwelcome and reeks of manipulating consensus. I posted this here because I want it to be known by others who visit your page, so that a file may be built up on your activities, and you can be judged as per your contributions and censorship. You seem to have english as a second language, and may not know that a ``contribution`` generally means an addition, not a removal. Cheers. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

611,376,305

` == your censorship of my criticism of your actions == your censorship of my criticism of your actions (if the 'piketty' section is absent in the future, readers will know what I'm talking about) paints you in a childish light. == piketty edit == Your attempt to censor valid criticism from the Piketty article is unwelcome and reeks of manipulating consensus. I posted this here because I want it to be known by others who visit your page, so that a file may be built up on your activities, and you can be judged as per your contributions and censorship. You seem to have english as a second language, and may not know that a ``contribution`` generally means an addition, not a removal. Cheers. `

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false