Datasets:
dirtycomputer
/
Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
617,736,997
. Again, you have been exposed
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,744,894
== Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2014 == Spanish Gini coefficient is no longer 34.0 Now it´s 33.7 so it changes from medium to high. In this website http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&language;=en&pcode;=tessi190 you can see the variation.
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
617,758,890
` :::So, you first make a claim that I wasn't uncivil on your talk page, but then you support my block for being uncivil, something you didn't think I was, on the grounds that you're no good at reading this kinda thing anyway and that you defer to the judgement of a person who did think I was uncivil. :::Then hour and half later, you (hour and a half ago self-admittedly not that good at ``reading passive-aggressiveness or bad-faith``) feel comfortable making a suggestion to the reviewing admin that it's essentially OK to turn down my unblock request without bothering to read more than one sentence. :::May I ask how do you imagine me getting a fair hearing by an untainted set of admin eyes now that you (another admin) suggested that several words ``should be enough for any admin to turn down this request``? Context, order of cause and consequence, who initiated this, the validity of initial accusations... I guess none of that plays a role. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,760,650
:::Alright, I appreciate you refraining from swaying the reviewing admin's mind further with your specific thoughts and analysis. Once the decision has been made, if you don't mind, I will request your personal input on what specifically made you have such a strong reaction to what I wrote to Joy and how you think a situation like should be handled in the future.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,783,137
::Teahouse helpfully directed me to WP:3O (Third Opinion). I added the question there (here).
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
617,795,110
:: Fuck off and don't you DARE threaten me. You have no control over me or my Internet access. You people on Wikipedia have gone off the deep end, you filthy totalitarians.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
617,809,797
Nishidani, please don't post your anti-Semitic hatred on Wikipedia. I strongly advise you to stay off of Jewish articles. Arab media is the worst sort of media. See Antisemitism in the Arab world. Posting links to Arab media should be regarded as vandalism. By the way, your comparison of the Jewish resistance to genocidal Islamic terrorists is putrid and defamatory. The goal of Hamas is to exterminate all Jews. They indiscriminately fire missiles at innocent civilians and use their own people as human shields. The Jewish resistance to British occupation did not kill people indiscriminately.
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
617,810,706
::Thanks for the review. I understand I used tone and level of sarcasm deemed inappropriate on Wiki and agree to keep that in mind going forward as I have during the previous almost a decade without any similar past issues. I let the emotions of anger get the better of me this time while defending from a false accusation and while I consciously took care to curtail my anger by avoiding profanity it definitely seems like I wasn't as receptive to the overall unpleasant tone.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
617,839,784
== Restored related photograph == and government officials observing a moment of silence in memory of the victims]] I've restored an official Kremlin photograph of Russian officials observing a moment of silence in memory of the victims because its directly related to the reactions. I know some may think they're directly responsible for the crash, and that may indeed be the case, but we're not here to make speculations before the investigation is over. -
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
617,842,567
` ::Yes thanks again for notifying me. Of your I had previously addressed the issues you have raised. · · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) `
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
617,857,333
: Not done: page move requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves. —  ·
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
617,879,584
(well, except for the inclusion of the radio station's entire contact info, complete with telephone and fax numbers, in the infobox where it didn't belong)
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
617,881,865
:What are the reliable sources calling it? ← '''' →
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
617,890,670
` :What? ``Hi. I'm Sweet Toof.`` is an attack? `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,911,985
`I don't have to show ``good faith`` to no-one... Who are you, anyway? `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,919,108
== REVERSIONS == Any particular reason you are reverting the wiklinks to the new page I created? Should the founder not be linked to their new pages???
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,919,484
: You cannot revert based on previous AFD unless the article is essentially the same READ POLICY .
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
617,920,610
:: Yeah no, quote policy on that is that's true, or admit your COI in support of Melaleuca. I will take this to the admin noticeboard if you continue to abuse your status. No admin is supposed to revert within minutes with no chance to expand an article. How many hundreds of Melaleuca articles do you doubt are out there?
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,924,081
== == The page has a long history of editors combatting RFC decisions. Please review the sources used, and previous postings, before just reverting to a redirect. Especially if it has been several years, and from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Vandersloot#Oil_of_Melaleuca.2C_Inc. down we basically have a coatracked article on Melaleuca inside the Frank L. Vandersloot page, I don't see the reason to treat this content with spite. A new AFD would appease me I guess ... however I guess you've decided to escalate to the point of an admin review.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,951,206
== ignore this nut case == RationalBlasphemist is fruity as!
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
617,951,328
Ignore this nut case
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
617,951,373
ignore this nut case
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
617,954,686
:::*Renoir and the fading of carmine lake. I've got some inkjet prints from the 1980s on display that have remained relatively unfaded (the inks would fade within hours in direct sunlight). I think this is because the prints are pressed up against the glass, and oxygen can't get at them. Left a commission bid on that painting- the photos I took with my phone don't show the vibrancy of the yellows.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
617,955,996
== The bastard always does it to me. An eye for an eye. == Sean.hoyland is a fucking cunt.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
617,985,584
` ::Are you suggesting that TDA was not a Lithuanian Auxiliary Police? Sure, it was... You're going round in circles splitting hair to obstruct the necessary change. This is not the Lithuanian Wikipedia. I'm asking that this article be named in English as part of the series. That's all. Thanks, `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
618,022,242
== Expansion == Can there be another section added to this article about unsubstantiated rumors that DUP is moving toward getting the British out of Ireland and ending Nanny Ireland? - 22 July, 2014
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
618,044,095
`, 22 July 2014 (UTC) :::``THIS VIDEO ONLY PLAYS IN THE UNITED STATES``, haha. 22:43`
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
618,049,058
Yeah? Fuck you. There are fascists all over that Euromaidan movement. Just check the ideology that guides most political parties involved in it, you fuck. ~~
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
618,051,160
== What the Heck == My information was true considering the fact that a news report confirmed it, so they had no business deleting it, because either way it was true,they probably didn't even try searching it up! Here's the report: http://www.newsnet5.com/entertainment/celebrity/nicki-minaj-gets-animated-for-steven-universe_09416171 If they were following the rules then they could have easily done some research to see if it was true or not. I did.So I hope they got a notification too.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
618,058,718
Ouch Pvpoodle It has gotten deep inside your skin ! Didnt it?? OUCH ! It is Inside your head now !!
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
618,058,762
Pvpoodle It has gotten deep inside your skin ! Didnt it?? OUCH !
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
618,058,834
! It is now inside your bones, your head. Haunt you forever
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
618,064,064
:::Oh for goodness sake. She's been gone 5 days and you've already assumed that she's breaching policy. Give it up and move on. • • logs)
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
618,077,108
I have brought this up at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard. I honestly don't see how the section is acceptable and really had hoped that he solution provided in an edit would do the trick. I also can't argue with you since it is obvious that we are not going to agree on wording that is acceptable. So off to the noticeboard it unfortunately goes. We should both know better by now.
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
618,077,601
Unfortunately, I would like to add a template to te Background section() due to the noticeboard discussion initiated here
2,014
false
article
blocked
test
false
618,077,769
Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2014
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
618,080,769
You are not reading what I stated. I have reverted to a version posted by a previous editor who stated that Ukraine happens to be a central European country. In this I have explicitly concurred with another editor's opinion. I am bewildered by your excessive reaction to this simple editorial step.
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
618,090,435
This is not a forum for you to spout ideology.
2,014
false
article
random
test
false
618,106,640
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2014 == Height = 5 ft 11 1/2 in (1.82m)
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,106,884
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2014 == Height = 5 ft 11 1/2 (1.82m)
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
618,113,015
` :Unit of measure is a very universal term. It is widely used in accounting and economics. Money is a monetary unit of measure. Money is also a concept. Money is also a physical unit. Non-physical units of measure like Celsius and Ohm and Fahrenheit are also units of measure. All of these need to appear in one article and properly organized. The articles that maybe have to be merged are 1. Unit of account. 2. Units of measurement. 3. System of measurement. The most widely used term in all the above is ``unit of measure``. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
618,113,607
:Unit of account and unit of measure are used as synonyms in economics and accounting. However, unit of account has a very specific definition in accounting that is not unit of measure.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,113,914
In IFRS and US GAAP a unit of account is not a unit of measure. At that level, a unit of account are the words used to describe an asset unit of liability unit for accounting purposes.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
618,114,294
not money or a fiat currency
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
618,117,559
:::::::Yes, you are right. The thing being measured is real value.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,132,523
` == Grep on Tool Labs == Hi, Thank you for the Grep tool (I feared that it disapeared with the toolserver). I noticed a bug with « Include redirects‎ » activated the redirects are in fact excluded ! Should I change the text on translatewiki or could you rather change the tool ? Cdlt, * `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
618,155,502
` == Inadequate definition in the first lines == Set aside the gradual issue for a second. I find the first sentence ``Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.`` inadequate, a pretty feeble attempt to define a momentous concept that has irreversibly altered the way mankind thinks about itself and its place in the world. That first sentence utterly fails to indicate anything at all about the nature of the change, its direction, its rate or the mechanism which brought it about or the mechanism that perpetuated it, or of its consequences. Then while we are still floundering in a miasma of doubt, before we are even introduced to the possibility that evolution is actually a process rather than just an event, we are subjected to ``Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organization . . .``. This introduction is vague, confusing, unencyclopedic, assumes too much of the reader's background knowledge. We must be able to do better than this. We need to come up with a new form of words that nails the essential features of the concept in as few words as possible. `
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
618,169,269
` == Please inform Ladislav Mecir not to state that a reference titled ``The Unit of Account Issue`` by the FASRI is the ``wrong`` citation regarding ``unit of account``. == Please be even handed and then also inform Ladislav Mecir not to state that a reference titled ``The Unit of Account Issue`` by the FASRI is the ``wrong`` citation regarding ``unit of account``. The Financial Accounting Standards Research Initiative is the best reference ever about ``unit of account`` in US GAAP as well as IFRS. Ladislav Mecir understands very little at the high IFRS and US GAAP level about accounting theory. I do. I work with this all the time. It is my field of expertise. Ladislav Mecir is making a fool of himself statind that the best reference is the ``wrong`` citation. Then, what is the ``right`` citation? Please ask him to supply the ``right`` citation. Apparently ``only`` he knows what is the ``right`` and what is the ``wrong`` citation for an item. You know that is not correct. Please be even handed and inform him to treat good faith editors with respect. He does not do that. If your are reasonable, then you will reprimand him for simply stating my reference, from the FASRI, titled ``The Unit of Account Issue`` which quotes extensively from US GAAP, US GAAP Framework and US GAAP Standards regaring ``unit of account`` regarding the item ``unit of account``. Ladislav Mecir, arrogantly and abusively, like always, simply - amazingly - states ``It is the WRONG citation``!!!!!! Can you believe that!!!!! Please inform him - as you have informed me - to be reasonable and to accept that a reference from the FASRI titled ``The Unit of Account Issue`` is the ``right`` reference about the item ``unit of account``. I would appreciate it very much if you could show your even handedness about this and reprimand him too. If you don´t, obviously then you will have no credibility. I am waiting to see you reprimand LADISLAV MECIR as well!! `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,170,356
== It is very sad when you refuse to accept a different opinion. == It is very sad when you refuse to accept a different opinion. disagree with you. You, meanly, call that an edit war. You are very mean. It is not an edit war. I simply disagree with you. Leave these disagreements on you talk page. Otherwise you are very abusive. I already sense you are very abusive and this will not end well. You are to swollen with Wikipedia abusive power. You are going to delete this too. You want me to leave. I will leave. Even communicating with an abusive thing like you is degrading.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
618,171,714
` == I was not ``edit-warring`` with you. I was DISAGREEING WITH YOU. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. == I was not ``edit-warring`` with you. I was DISAGREEING WITH YOU. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. Let me teach you: edit-warring is when an editor repeatedly reverts to put his or her edit in the article. You and I NEVER got near ANY article page!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So, if we were not putting content into an article, how in hell could we be edit-warring??????????????????? You are being very, very silly. We are disagreeing on something. We are not edit-warring about putting content into an article. How long have you been on Wikipedia???????? Obviously, you think threatening me with ``EDIT-WARRINGB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!`` will prove you right. No, you are wrong: we are not edit-warring about content in an article. You simply do not want to hear a different opinion. Don´t be ashamed of that. That is very normal in normal life and also here on Wikipedia. 99.999% of the people you will deal with in the world and here on Wikipedia are not interested in a different opinion. You and they think you are always 100% right in whatever you say and do. That is normal. So, don´t be ashame~d. You are being perfectly normal here on Wikipedia accusing me of edit-warring when I am not even adding content to an article. I am not edit-warring. You are being very silly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 `
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
618,172,152
my friend you this website alqassam.ps is hamas official website and if you read arabic you will know that what you said above is completly wrong and intentially misleading
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,172,171
: I meant WP:NGOLF.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
618,173,057
== How can you even dream of communicating with me when you refuse to accept a different opinion? You are crazy! == How can you even dream of communicating with me when you refuse to accept a different opinion? You are crazy! You admit to being completely unreasonable by not accepting a difference of opinion. Wow!! Wikipedia is 100% about differences in opinion!! Did you not know that!! Surely you cannot expect to communicate with me when you refuse, point blank, that maybe, I might disagree with you!! How old are you!! Are you perhaps 11 years old? Ok, if that is so, then I understand.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
618,173,208
This is difficult for you, isn´t it? The fact that some-one might disagree with you! Welcome to Wikipedia!!
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,179,742
, you are making a fool of yourself!! This is not edit-warring!! Are you crazy?? I was not reverting any content in any article. You make me laugh!! Please indicate what content I reverted in what article in my communications with you!! I simply disagreed with you!! That is not edit-warring!! It is simply a disagreement!! , you are making a fool of yourself!!! , do you think I am a child or something?? , you are simply abusive and disrespectful and making a false statement. Prove me wrong!!
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
true
618,180,745
, you are a fake and a fraud as a Wikipedia editor: you delete my disagreements from you talk page!! , you have no credibility as a Wikipedia editor. , you are abusive and disrespectful!! Prove me wrong!!
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
true
618,185,956
` == Sabbath Bloody Sabbath == ``Wrongly placed warning`` Not a single apology for that? `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,187,204
== , disagreement is not an attack. == , disagreement is not an attack. But, I understand that you see any disagreement as an attack. I fully understand that. Your types are hard-wired like that. It is impossible for you to see a disagreement as simply that: a disagreement. No, you see it as an attack. I understand. You are like that. And nothing can change you. That is why you see a disagreement as edit-warring too. You have a wild imagination. And here on Wikipedia you can abuse other editors as you like and as you do. That actually makes Wikipedia what it is. So, keep up your abuse. Wikipedia needs editors like you and Ladislav Mecir to abuse good-faith editors.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,191,672
` ::``shallow``!?! Are you fooling me? `
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
618,223,214
:::But again. The Variety source is a reliable source (even stated again here) that, again per WP:V, will be used until a new or different reliable source comes around that says otherwise. -
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
618,223,571
: I perceive a very strong emotional response here. First of all, you seem to be adopting a position that you deem to be somehow 'correct'. I do not see what makes your POV more relevant or acceptable that other peoples'. Are you entitled to make pronouncements on behalf of English Wikipedia? If so, who appointed you to this role? : I have no relationship with this particular editor, or any other for that matter. My revert has been simply an expression of my opinion as I was entirely unaware of the history behind this. However, I do not understand why you take it upon yourself to pass judgment as to what constitutes a 'correct position'.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
618,224,821
:: As a technical aside, what currently is included in Western Ukraine was once part of the Austro-Hungarian state. As such, there is at least a modicum of fact that a part of Ukraine used to belong to Central Europe. Needless to say, this geographic interpretation must be viewed in conjunction with other geo-political factors. Ukraine is a very new country and comprises parts that have only recently been brought together into one state.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
618,243,129
` Chuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Judo Rank 10th degree black belt Chun Kuk Do 9th degree black belt Tang Soo Do 8th degree black belt Taekwondo black belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Judo Carlos Ray ``Chuck`` Norris (born March 10, 1940) is an American martial artist and actor. After serving in the United States Air Force, he began his rise to fame as a martial artist, and has since founded his own school, Chun Kuk Do. Norris appeared in a number of action films, such as Way of the Dragon, in which he starred alongside Bruce Lee, and was The Cannon Group's leading star in the 1980s.[1][2] He played the starring role in the television series Walker, Texas Ranger from 1993 until 2001. Norris is a devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on ChristiChuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Judo Rank 10th degree black belt Chun Kuk Do 9th degree black belt Tang Soo Do 8th degree black belt Taekwondo black belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Judo Carlos Ray ``Chuck`` Norris (born March 10, 1940) is an American martial artist and actor. After serving in the United States Air Force, he began his rise to fame as a martial artist, and has since founded his own school, Chun Kuk Do. Norris appeared in a number of action films, such as Way of the Dragon, in which he starred alongside Bruce Lee, and was The Cannon Group's leading star in the 1980s.[1][2] He played the starring role in the television series Walker, Texas Ranger from 1993 until 2001. Norris is a devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on ChristiChuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Judo Rank 10th degree black belt Chun Kuk Do 9th degree black belt Tang Soo Do 8th degree black belt Taekwondo black belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Judo Carlos Ray ``Chuck`` Norris (born March 10, 1940) is an American martial artist and actor. After serving in the United States Air Force, he began his rise to fame as a martial artist, and has since founded his own school, Chun Kuk Do. Norris appeared in a number of action films, such as Way of the Dragon, in which he starred alongside Bruce Lee, and was The Cannon Group's leading star in the 1980s.[1][2] He played the starring role in the television series Walker, Texas Ranger from 1993 until 2001. Norris is a devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on ChristiChuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Judo Rank 10th degree black belt Chun Kuk Do 9th degree black belt Tang Soo Do 8th degree black belt Taekwondo black belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Judo Carlos Ray ``Chuck`` Norris (born March 10, 1940) is an American martial artist and actor. After serving in the United States Air Force, he began his rise to fame as a martial artist, and has since founded his own school, Chun Kuk Do. Norris appeared in a number of action films, such as Way of the Dragon, in which he starred alongside Bruce Lee, and was The Cannon Group's leading star in the 1980s.[1][2] He played the starring role in the television series Walker, Texas Ranger from 1993 until 2001. Norris is a devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on ChristiChuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Judo Rank 10th degree black belt Chun Kuk Do 9th degree black belt Tang Soo Do 8th degree black belt Taekwondo black belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Judo Carlos Ray ``Chuck`` Norris (born March 10, 1940) is an American martial artist and actor. After serving in the United States Air Force, he began his rise to fame as a martial artist, and has since founded his own school, Chun Kuk Do. Norris appeared in a number of action films, such as Way of the Dragon, in which he starred alongside Bruce Lee, and was The Cannon Group's leading star in the 1980s.[1][2] He played the starring role in the television series Walker, Texas Ranger from 1993 until 2001. Norris is a devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on ChristiChuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Judo Rank 10th degree black belt Chun Kuk Do 9th degree black belt Tang Soo Do 8th degree black belt Taekwondo black belt Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Judo Carlos Ray ``Chuck`` Norris (born March 10, 1940) is an American martial artist and actor. After serving in the United States Air Force, he began his rise to fame as a martial artist, and has since founded his own school, Chun Kuk Do. Norris appeared in a number of action films, such as Way of the Dragon, in which he starred alongside Bruce Lee, and was The Cannon Group's leading star in the 1980s.[1][2] He played the starring role in the television series Walker, Texas Ranger from 1993 until 2001. Norris is a devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on ChristiChuck Norris From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the American politician, see Chuck Norris (politician). Page semi-protected Chuck Norris Chuck Norris 2007 (cropped).jpg Norris visits deployed Airmen from the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing in Southwest Asia in 2007. Born Carlos Ray Norris March 10, 1940 (age 74) Ryan, Oklahoma, U.S. Occupation Actor, martial artist Years active 1968–present Spouse(s) Dianne Holechek (1958–88) Gena O'Kelley (1998–present) Children 5 Website www.chucknorris.com Chuck Norris Style Chun Kuk Do, Tang Soo Do, Taekwondo, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
618,243,206
devout Christian and politically conservative. He has written several books on Christi
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
618,243,333
Hey, the page exists at VJM Media Group. There is an ongoing AFD (Articles for Deletion) debate on the page, so you might want to take part in that. Hope this helps )
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
618,294,855
:Although I'm not going to block you at the moment, your recent user talk postings have been fair from collegial. If you continue to act in this manner, then a block could be applied.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
618,310,767
== Known for money laundering == D'Souza is so well known for money laundering that the talk page is full of discussion, yet a user keeps removing that from the page. A little bit ironic there... ulterior motive?
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,311,871
` == Your vandalism on Vani Hari == Please revert your bad-faith vandalism of Vani Hari in the removal of an entire criticism section. You claimed that the sources were unviable but ``Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications.`` If you do not revert I will be forced to report your vandalism.`
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
618,313,120
Not controversial. He is a convicted felon for money laundering and it's been all over the news: https://www.google.com/search?q=d%27souza+money+laundering&oq;=d%27souza+money+laundering&aqs;=chrome..69i57.4646j0j1&sourceid;=chrome&es;_sm=93&ie;=UTF-8#q=d'souza+money+laundering+guilty
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
618,314,477
Oi twat why are you editing my segments? Todd Howard is a twat hence why I said so.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
618,316,301
` http://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/dinesh-dsouza-pleads-guilty-illegal-campaign-contribution-106882.html FELONY: ``The single felony count D’Souza admitted guilt on...`` http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-berkowitz/america-dinesh-dsouzas-de_b_5563541.html ``part of his problem is his conviction for illegal political campaign donations and money laundering,```
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
618,316,622
==Proposal to remove Wikipedia:More-sources template== Since her untimely death, the page has been flooded with edits that include links to verifiable sources. I propose we remove the template for Template:Refimprove until further edits are made.
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
618,327,859
` Fine then. Use the term ``Campaign Finance Fraud`` instead. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,338,477
::: In your earlier post you say 'I will from here onward try to be friendlier with the other users', and now later the same day, you seem to again be taking a confrontational approach. Also, I'm unclear why you think I'm involved in an editing dispute with you - so far my involvement has been purely administrative.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
618,342,549
` Why don't you look through the edit history and see all the editors besides me who have tried to fix the horrible page you created then. You clearly don't care about it - what have you not looked at for the past year and then suddenly saw all of the changes and though ``oh no, I'm gonna revert back to MY version`` when the rest of us actually look at the page and care about it. especially having the character names there and those ugly pictures on the side instead of more information about the actual category. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,366,134
` :::Another thought. THe Mozart reference is actually to a blog on the site Kickstarter. I think this should be removed as it assumes the statement that Crowdfunding was actually a precursor (they talk about the Pope Kickstarting it) and it is pretty self serving and advert like. I don't think it adds anything but could be useful in the Praenumeration or patronage article. Here is what I propose: 1. remove the bulk of the Pulitzer reference to a history section in Preanumeration and possibly mention that some consider preanumeration to be an early precursor to Crowdfunding. 2. Move the Mozart reference to the patronage article for the reasons stated above. The reason being is that neither could have possibly used the Internet or a ``platform`` in the context of crowdfunding. It is all good information but maybe references to other more appropriate articles so we can get the history section down to a manageable size. it is a pretty big article!`
2,014
false
article
random
dev
false
618,375,751
:There was nothing but good intent. You placing a warning is fuck a best.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
618,377,464
` ==Overview== THDL was established in 2000 in association with the University of Virginia Library and the Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, using the innovative FEDORA (Flexible Extensible Digital Object Repository Architecture) system. Content includes publications, research resources, language learning materials, and a gazetteer. THDL provides ``an integrated environment for the digital publication of many diverse academic projects connected with Tibet and the Himalayan region``. The structure of THDL consists of five overarching domains: Collections, Reference, Community, Tools, and Education. Content of THDL is in English, Tibetan, Nepali, Dzongkha and Chinese languages. Most content in the digital library is published under the THDL Public License For Digital Texts. The project is run by an international team of scholars from universities and private organizations around the world. THDL hosts the Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies (JIATS), a freely available online, peer-reviewed English language academic journal focusing on Tibetan studies.`
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,377,934
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions. Your edit includes new external links. These may be much welcomed links to references. Please note that the no follow HTML attribute is applied to external links in Wikipedia, instructing search engines to ignore these links when computing page ranks. For information on our standards for adding links, please see our External links Guideline. To help protect against automated spam, please enter the words that appear below in the box, without any spaces (more info)
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
618,378,359
you're a fucking shit
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
true
618,378,549
` :I know, I have tried to vandalize these past two minutes only to find the ``view source`` page! You're too slow Favonian! How about go suck some dick. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,393,825
` == Hello! == I've noticed you've nominated Shahrukh Khan's article for GA. I've also nominated Katrina Kaif's article for the same. So, I have a proposition, if you're willing to accept. How about we review each other's nomination? What do you think?? `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
618,403,555
:::::::Very possible, I'm a philosopher not a mathematician, it's been a while since I've had to do so much maths.
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
618,412,622
`Further, the block was placed long hours after any discussions or responses had occurred, while I was in fact ASLEEP; this also shows that the block was intended not to be within the scope of policy but simply as a retaliatory, vindictive attack: ``Blocks should not be used: in retaliation against users; to disparage other users; as punishment against users; or where there is no current conduct issue of concern.`` . `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,413,710
I didn't remove your nonsensical reply, I was editing my own request to show the portion of policy that was violated and hit save.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
618,414,136
`::Further it's obvious to me that you didn't even bother looking at the situation where a user has engaged in widespread content-blanking (which IS covered under the definition of vandalism, ``any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia``). They suggested I take it to the ``helpdesk``, but I was given no chance to see or respond to that message until, HOURS LATER, the admin blocked in an entirely retaliatory, punitive, against-policy manner. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
618,415,878
` == Against Corrupt Blocks == `
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
618,417,928
== TWA 800 == Any thoughts on including TWA 800 as a possible ?
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
618,422,729
:If you were really interested in good-faith editing you wouldn't have gone running to get an illegitimate block placed on me as a form of harassment, @Srich32977. It's clear to me that your goal is not to follow policy or edit in good faith, just to harass people who object to your content blankings.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
618,449,038
first I know the rules of Wikipedia better than you and it's not your job to deleted my writing . I have to defend my history and I am sure you don't know anything about Iran . please take back my writing about 300 rise of an empire . 300 director and writer both are fibster and racist and your work show that you are some one like them. I am Persian and I should write about Iran not some racist and some busybody like you .
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,452,357
why you deleted my writing ? I am Persian I want defend my history . why are you racist ? why are you believe the 300 ? if some one do it with your country what are you doing ?
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
618,466,028
REDIRECT Talk:John McPherson (footballer, born 1867)
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
618,473,546
:::::Agreed. Some duplication may be unavoidable, but both of them are notable for other stuff, not just F&T.;
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
618,478,506
` == Me, ``constantly mentioning other editors by name``. == ``Constantly measuring other editors by name`` - a characteristic you attribute to me in a negative way - is a very necessary, human, kind, friendly, warm, acceptable, welcome and common style for many warm, kind and friendly human beings. Only a negative person like you would regard that as something negative to mention against a person - something I find atrocious, shockingly bad, tasteless, dreadful and abominable. You should not be so negative towards other editors. Especially stating that an editor wastes Wikipedians time by contributing to Wikipedia. That is absolutely unforgivable and absolutely not acceptable. You should be given at least a 48 hour ban for such an atrocious statement. You should learn to more friendly with other editors. You are not forced to be here on Wikipedia. You can leave if you feel that good faith editors are wasting your time. I suggest you speak to a priest or other religious caregiver to help you with your negative feelings towards good faith Wikipedians. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
618,481,355
::Please stop bullying me.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,489,184
== Fixing the page == This page needs a lot of work, looking at other Metro Area articles I've seen that San Francisco's is no where near as detailed and that needs to be fixed, it needs to be known as the San Francisco metro Area, for its own MSA and San Francisco Bay Metro Area for its CSA, and the page needs an info box added as well ( )
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
618,492,167
:::::::::::Have you tried the more traditional methods like ice-lemonade and cold showers?
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
618,495,821
I see someone has edited out all information about the Dr. Chris White scandal.
2,014
false
article
random
train
false
618,503,290
` I dont know how to message u without disrupting your page but im here to let u know that the page u mentioned is flawed. That leverne person is not a woman its a man. No matter what changes someone goes through they will be whatever gender they were created and no one is created transgender. So u keep on being ignorant but ``she`` is not a she and I will not address him as ``she```
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
618,507,356
::Hey! Thanks for being a dick and adding a warning template on an IP talk page instead of fixing your fuck up. Your mindbogglingly idiotic idea that the background section should follow the one editorial you read instead of countless other sources is superb. Way to fuck up a massive section in a highly read article you fucking dolt.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true