dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
620,035,393	== DRN escalation recommendation to ANI and Mediation re Historicity of Jesus == Just FYI [ANI request] [Mediation request]	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
620,038,407	`:I don't know if I'm identifying a problem that isn't there, but I worry the ``contemporary Armenian sources`` might be open to misunderstanding. Of course what it means is ``sources written by persons who were alive at the time Mashtots was alive`` - but do you think readers will know that is what it means? Is there another, clearer, way of saying it, but more concise than my explanation of what contemporary means. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,040,512	== Inclusion of Inuit Creation myths == Is there space in this article for inclusion of Inuit perspectives on their origins?	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,049,031	` == Classic == Jimmy Wales stated, ``We need to maintain and improve our quality standards, while at the same time remaining open, friendly, and welcoming as a community. This is a challenge.`` Wikipedia's co-founder Larry Sanger characterizes the Wikipedia community as ineffective and abusive, stating that ``The community does not enforce its own rules effectively or consistently. Consequently, administrators and ordinary participants alike are able essentially to act abusively with impunity, which begets a never-ending cycle of abuse.`` Oliver Kamm, of The Times expressed skepticism toward Wikipedia's reliance on consensus in forming its content: ``Wikipedia seeks not truth but consensus, and like an interminable political meeting the end result will be dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices.``Wisdom? More like dumbness of the crowds \| Oliver Kamm – Times Online (archive version 2011-08-14) (Author’s own copy) The complaints related to the community include the effects of users' anonymity, the attitudes towards newcomers, the abuse of privileges by administrators, biases in the social structure of the community, in particular, gender bias and lack of female contributors, Sounds like they are talking about this article. Good thing some of us are loud and persistent in our calls for neutrality and balance. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,051,235	Polemics, rehashing old claims, fighting over perceived biases and trying to blame each other for whatever will not solve this problem. I perceive that the fundamental premise of the dominant editors holds that any critique of the prevalent analysis in this article must begin and end within the terms set by the proponents of that analysis. This is not logical. To elucidate and support an alternative proposition is not bound by any other disciplines a priori, asserted or even purported evidentiary claims to knowledge. Historical-critical biblical theologians have no automatic nor exclusive claim to authority in this matter. Neutrality in this instance is clear. The article must provide context to the reader about the question, show the various positions and approaches taken in different fields, and ensure that no single claim to exclusive authority or evocation of essentially meaningless and conflictual universal generalisations is present. It can not possibly be any clearer. The article is fundamentally flawed in two ways 1)claims to exclusive authority and 2) circular and self-referential evidentiary support. If we welcome a diversity of perspectives, educate the reader, and all show more respect and dignity to each other we will surely end up with one heck of a great article. What do you think?	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,056,196	== Umm == Dumb ass noob here with my dick stuck in a bear trap with a coven of evil warlocks breathing down my neck intent on my utter destruction and making me sad too boot, and hateful of my self. But hurting others, so I must act. I guess. Help? Advice! Hug? Slap, a la Patton?	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
620,057,879	== Thanks == Greetings. I wanted to thank you about the good job with . It was swift and efficient. (People might have told you that it was not perfect because you paid too much attention to unimportant details; maybe, but overall, there was a lot of wisdom and teamwork in the whole thing.)	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,074,211	\|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you #understand what you have been blocked for, #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and *#will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
620,135,691	` == File:Tom Carstairs In Concert.jpg == Given the possibility of timed camera shutters and the consequent possibility of photographing oneself, this is clearly not a blatant copyright infringement, so a DRV will be filed should you leave the closure as ``delete``. It would be advisable if, in the future, you would refrain from assuming that others had failed to investigate the situation, for I at least did investigate, or I would have deleted it or advocated deletion. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
620,138,588	Split up When did they split up? 1999 was the last single release ever. Probably disestablished in 2000?	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
620,147,908	\|politician-work-group = yes\|listas=Day, Chris	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,151,314	` are you a troll? why are you accusing me that i ``blank articles`` and nominate a page that was edited from this ip some time ago, while a brief check of previous nomination shows that it is completely bogus?`	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	true
620,156,922	:: What request? I asked a question. Let me do so again. How does that work again? And, since when is a clique a person? And in what manner does a neutral statement become an attack? Oh, and I have not asked to be unblocked. As it stands. This would be the only place to discuss the concerns I original brought to DRN and that they told me to refer to ANI. I perceive that these are still not being addressed.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
620,164,937	::::You absolutely do not come across as pious. Thank you for your counsel. At this point, in this forum, my request for ANI support, made at the direction of DRN, to resolve the questions brought here were ignored, and reflexively and immediately turned into a different issue. The decision to block was made outside of the procedures that I understand should take place (engagement of the relevant editors, inquiry, debate, mediation, etc..). All the editors who agreed to mediate a solution on MEDCOM and the external review request and the Talk page of the article are being blocked. All the months and months of abuse of process and people by the little cabal of editors at question are being allowed to continue. As long as I remain blocked the question remains: why? Because of an investigation into the issues presented? After careful inquiry? After an attempt to connect to all the editors concerned? These have not happened. Instead I have been blocked on the testimony of two of the culpable parties, about whom, nothing, again, once more as usual, has been done. I am proud to be blocked. It reminds me, and others, that there is a problem. It also reminds me that I have more to do with my life then debate post-grads lost in the fervour of their self-righteous belief in the perfection of their discipline. (That's not you by the way) Thanks for your support. Good luck. Don't give up. Keep watching these pages.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
620,174,972	I did not see you message, sorry! I have resubmitted the article right now, please check. Thank you!	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
620,191,365	This page with the DVD of the series is the only one that I can find at the moment.	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,213,355	== referencing sources == You should take care to reference you sources properly. Use the templates. This is what a proper reference supposed to look like: {{cite news\| url=http://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/news/29455981/vvp-rossii-v-pervom-polugodii-vyros-na-1-minekonomrazvitiya \|publisher=[[Vedomosti]]\| title=ВВП России в первом полугодии вырос на 1% — Минэкономразвития\| date=27 July 2014\|accessdate=7 August 2014\|language=Russian}} I'm not going to fix it for you. Also, please don't stuff this article with irrelevant, outdated and inaccurate information. I made a lot of effort to clean it up.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
620,216,621	== 's behaviour == There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
620,235,022	Powers of Disallowance and Reservation]] [1938] SCR 71 (followed by Reference re Alberta Statutes) # :: [[Reference re	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
620,241,628	Mahan, as a young son of a poor Irish immigrant in Virginia was educated by Michael de Lacy when their were no public schools in Virginia.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
620,253,180	== Proposal: Going back to the bare bones again == Until this article is deleted as it should have been originally barring admin incompetence, I propose going back to this version, which is the cut-down version deliberately edited. # The amount of text is more proportionate to his notability. There isn't much point in having pages and pages of material on somebody who is entirely unnotable. # The article doesn't go into detail about the obvious (and well-discussed) problems - it just ignores them. This seems to be the best option for BLP reasons. This also seems to be the best option in the light of the fact that this article is being edited by people who fundamentally don't understand the problems that we have. ** ''It also solves the problem of avoiding interpretation of sources which is sailing closer to WP:NOR.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,255,101	::How is it known that they originate from Israelite tribes if they don't know how they arrived. Where is the evidence? The reference that claims they descended from Israelite tribes is also broken.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,259,638	and the Outside Hitter is 35	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,268,219	`There are many more linguistic features that are exclusively shared with Italic (mostly Sabellic) but non existing in Keltic (not going to waste my time listing all of them) Your the ``expert`` so keep on truckin and always remember if you `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,279,226	== Dispute resolution notice RE:Retrospective diagnoses of autism and WikiProject tags == This is a notification to inform you that a discussion has been added to the dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a dispute you may be involved in. *Direct link: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Retrospective_diagnoses_of_autism	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,280,159	` :::::: Oh Mr. Blaschke dot get too emotional just because i called your boyfriend an ``expert`` LOL; Pala/Palam has a known etymology and it is palso- (Latin:sepelio Umbrian:pelsa-) meaning Tombstone/Rock and equivalent to the Gaelic 'All' (notice no p); do not get to full of rage just because you and your dear boyfriend look like cows in the rain and have 'NO clue; proper experts LOL; PS: you claim to be from Bavaria but your last-name is Polish; `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
620,280,405	As for uvamokozis LOL thank you for the punchline	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,281,457	:::::: And btw i already know that you and your crew of intimate experts have NO clue concerning Archaeology you do not have to repeat it over and over; But it is Archaeologically impossible for a people (Insubres where the majority of inscriptions were found) of the Golasecca culture (12th century BC Urnfield group) to have been anything other than Italic;	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,282,072	`PPS: If the relevance of the Insubres here is truly unclear for you than i seriously suggest you inform yourself about the topic; Because after such a statement only pathetic and sad come to mind concerning you and your crew of ``experts``; `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,288,340	` == Should Glenn Curtiss's 1907 record be included == In 1907 Glenn Curtiss set a speed record on a motorcycle which was faster than the then current car record. Since this article is ``land speed record`` and not ``automobile speed record``, it seems like the Curtiss record should be included (albeit with a note in the comments that the record was not recognized by the French, same as the Ford 999 record).`	2,014	false	article	random	train	false
620,288,562	` == Arbitrary lists are NEVER a good idea == Hi, I removed the lists as it was becoming a magnet for original research. When can have lists of concrete things (like ``Cities in the Republic of Ireland``, ``Fellows of the National Academy of Sciences``, ``chemical elements``. Open-ended lists, especially those having a strong element of subjectivity, such as ``the most important Fellows of the National Academy of Sciences``, ``cities with the best pubs in Ireland``, ``my favourite chemical elements`` or ``most prominent autistic savants`` are never a good idea. So it's been removed. Thanks for your understanding. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
620,290,246	` :This is clearly the same person as , and the various IP editors all of whom have made variations on the same edits. :Note that used the terms ``pagans`` just like Islamthetruth123 in his edits to the article on the Battle of Hunayn: Bdbbfbfbfb's edit, Islamthetruth123's edit. :I suspect that what we are dealing with is an individual with multiple identities on Wikipedia. :His/her being the same person as Islamthetruth123 is legitimate - that account was blocked and they were told to get a new ID. :I do not think that he/she can be reported to any forum just yet. The answer is to revert giving an explanation in the edit summary, and template them every time you revert them. That way they build up a nice selection of warnings, which often attracts admin attention and results in a block if the admin thinks your behaviour is justified. `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,294,504	*OIC, the file extension has to be jpeg and not jpg.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
620,295,571	` Dear Colleagues, I thank the various administrators and editors for their patience, and for their comments here, on the various talk pages and by email. Many comments have been made about procedural failures. Each of my steps in the dispute resolution process is prefaced with a request for advice and direction about how to do this properly, as I note here, because I did not know how to request, or manage, an ANI conduct review or MEDCOM mediation properly. A decision to block me was made, which I will not contest, based on comprehensive notes from two editors and accusations that I provide no evidence. I did not know how or when to do so, but I am learning quickly. In regard to arguments made by the editors and , above, and upon which a decision was made to block me, I respond as follows: # I reviewed a long history of contentious discussion and edits in Historicity of Jesus. # I then posted a bold sourced here, which I encourage you to examine. You may see that they are in some cases minor clarifications, in others short simple neutrally toned presentations of divergent academic perspectives. In each instance the sources provided, apply only to the conceptual background of the claims made, and do not pertain to the specific line by line claims of this article, because, the citations largely concern the framework of the discussion not its extensive particulars. # I started a talk page discussion # Smeat75 reverted my edit without discussion here # Smeat75 responded to my talk page discussion, but did not address the reasoning for the revision, here # I continued discussion on the talk page and reverted back my edits here # Ian.thomson reverted my edit with note of ``You must develop consensus`` here # I reverted with note ````Local consensus`` is opposed by Wikipedia:Editing policy. Wait for external review.`` here # I requested external review at WP:RFC and continued discussion on the Talk page here # Ian.thomson reverted the edit I requested review on, again, here # External review collapsed as editors ignored process and comments from external parties # I had been following what I knew of appropriate policy and felt I was being repeatedly reverted without discussion or attempts to communicate, so... # I then requested Dispute Resolution here, please read ``dispute overview`` # Dispute resolution was opened, great comments received from many editors, and closed unresolved, as explained here # On advice of DRN I applied to ANI for advice on resolution of conduct conflicts here, and to MEDCOM for content mediation here # MEDCOM opened the request, 5 editors to date have agreed to mediation # ANI administrator then blocked me without addressing my request for advice, nor making inquiries with me and apparently based solely on the comments of two editors about which I have conduct concerns. My specific conduct concerns, about some editors, are outlined below. # flagrant misrepresentation and exaggeration of proposed edits and propositions as here, here, here, here, here, and here # claiming group consensus, here,here, here when there is no consensus at all, as explicitly noted here and by the POV tag, and evidenced by ongoing edit suggestions such as these,here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here coming from many different editors during the course of this conflict. # ignoring requests to communicate as here # insults and harassment as found here, here and discussed here, and extensively discussed here # Accusations of mental deficiency, incompetence, bigotry, hypocrisy etc as [here, here, here, here, here, here and here # editing other users talk comments as noted here # multiple unsubstantiated accusations or insinuations of sock puppetry as here, and Ian.Thompson here and here and 2 others here and here Note: there may be overlapping references above. Due to the nature of the discussion, different types of egregious behaviour are mixed together within individual comments. These activities have been long term, systematic and continuous. They go back months into the Talk page archive. I asked for advice on how to deal with this, and have been blocked for not knowing how to deal with this. As I have learned how this entire processes works, I have attempted to conform to the various procedural requirements, on the fly. If I had known how, and that, I needed to provide this level of detail, I would have already done so, after learning how to. Now I have. My apologies for my ignorance, and the lateness of this material. regards `	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
620,320,363	::Yes, I saw that, but look at the edit that WhisperToMe links to: it's dated July 27th. whisperToMe undoubtedly had a reason to post on the IP's talk page, but the reason wasn't necessarily recent vandalism, and it didn't necessarily require reporting to AIV. Or WhisperToMe could've simply been mistaken; it happens to the best of us. The point is that reports to AIV should be for recent behavior, and you should make sure that there is, in fact, recent behavior to reportby checking the user's contributionsbefore making it.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,338,330	== Stop your nonsense. == It is clear that you lack the intelligence to know and identify famous historical han chinese people, so you edited the han chinese page and changed the infobox, changing a famous scientist like Zhang Heng to an actress that nobody in the world cares.	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	true
620,347,740	== User:ImiBill == Hi! I just got back from a trip, so my apologies for not responding sooner. ImiBill's explanation seems reasonable - I'm aware that LifeVantage hired CastleKing1440 to post an article using copy that they had provided, and it was subsequently posted by a definite duck. The job remained (and remains) ongoing. It is possible that ImiBill was employed independent of CastleKing1440 prior to CastleKing1440's contract, and they returned to post the article even though CastleKing1440 was still employed to post it. I'm not opposed to unblocking, although their contributions raise some separate red flags. -	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,351,738	== You started it. == LOL, there would not have been an edit war' if there were no participants, that includes you and your other account, Balthazarduju. So bring it on.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
620,352,136	Reply to reply to I changed the photo for a reason	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
620,352,508	It doesn't mean if infoboxes of other ethnic groups' wiki pages that don't have an object to represent someone means the han chinese infobox must not have an object representing a person. You make no sense in your argument you stupid asshole. ~	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
620,352,752	Holy shit shut the f* up you motherf* c***!	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
620,383,959	:Hi Cutest Penguin! Sorry but I don't know anything about this topic.	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
620,387,871	==why you delete == $800,000 in improvements started at the 800-foot-long, deep-water dock that is to accommodate cruise ships ....... you don't a like a salem you a stick up for a da stalker onhitsajamie	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
620,390,960	:::::HBD bloggers aren't part of the American establishment bought out by self-perpetuating Boasian Marxist Jews and so parroting them may threaten Maunus' paycheck.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,397,254	== Ukrainian parliament sources claim over 10,000 killed in Donbas, including thousands of Ukrainian soldiers == http://rt.com/news/179048-ten-thousand-killed-ukraine/ Now, it is known that hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers have been confirmed to have got killed in Donbas. This is when their bodies are recovered from areas of battle. However, most of the time, bodies are not recovered and soldiers are listed as missing. It is not published how many Ukrainian soldiers are missing.	2,014	false	article	random	dev	false
620,413,487	:Yes, there was criticism in the article, suggesting evaporation as the source of the thurst. However, it was (together with all criticisms) removed/censored by POV pushing editors. No control for mass was done in either experiment, and evaporation of order of less than microgram per second could easily explain the effect (especially in the NASA case); even more so, if there is some moisture. What you are essentially doing, is microwaving the interior of a cone, and - surprise surprise - there is a small force in the opposite direction. Then you turn off the heating, but your interior is still at higher temperature, measure it again, and there is still a force - yet smaller. Nothing to do with exotic physics, everything to do with experimental error due to unforeseen effect of evaporation, i.e. ablation (though some moisture might play an effect, especially if there are parts other than metal; this is, in my opinion, the most likely explanation - EM radiation cannot cause such effect at these power/force ratios (that part was also removed from the article, though all was sourced). So, if there is no some weird effect (and QED effects, virtual plasma included, boil down to EM radiation reaction, there is no violation of impulse conservation there, so that is excluded too), it should be reaction from some loss of mass - and evaporation is an obvious source. However, they did not check for that. Also, some of experiments were done in atmosphere (at atmospheric pressure, even in chamber?! according to brief paper), so other possibility is interaction with heated air. However, in vacuum, ablation seems to be most likely explanation. Why all this sourced material and all criticism was removed, beats me.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,415,624	` :: The deletion process really want fubar on this one. Admin whose name I can't remember, unilaterally closed it choosing to ignore the WP:BLP and WP:MINOR policy issues, and the fact that the delete calls were coming from experienced Wikipedians and the keeps from obsessed fanboys. The ``review`` then was then a shoulder shrug which made reference to ``interesting arguments`` but didn't apparently consider those aguments in detail. 's assertion that the article is bullet proof because it ``survived AFD and DRV`` is pure fantasy. It is still a problematic BLP of a minor (not that some people understand this). `	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,416,647	OH AND HCERE IS A LITTEL THING FOR YOU GIVE ME MORE AND I CAN EAT HOT FOOD CAN YOU I DO NOT THINK THAT YOU CAN AND IF YOU CAN CATCH ME AND I CAN OUT RUN YOU AND MAKE ME LOOSE MY BRETH AND HIT ME BABY ONE MORE TIME AND IF YOU DO YOU CAN HAVE ME ALL TO YOUIR SELF	2,014	false	article	random	train	false
620,421,091	- there is alas little point in becoming obsessive about someone who isn't important at all, such as this individual, as you have done. Given that the article has been deleted once already, and is clearly inconsistent with policy, and that the predictions made by some about Nobel Prizes etc are entirely absurd, it is clear that it will be deleted, preferably sooner rather than later. Arguing about this is I'm afraid rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,429,891	` Sorry, this does not seem like an RS to me. Sample of headlines from today: :``Israelis Gather, Watch, Cheer, Celebrate Over 1,200 Dead in Gaza`` :``Murdoch’s Media Monopoly: Are the Globalists Streamlining Their PR for WWIII?`` :``Malaysian Airlines False Flag Scripting Straight Out of BBC’s ‘Sherlock’`` :``Ex-Border Agent Says US Government ‘Facilitating’ Illegal Surge Scheme`` :I think it is fair to say this is just a FRINGE blog. `	2,014	false	article	random	train	false
620,456,501	Yes I know, that guy keeps reversing my properly sourced information just because he is on the mobile device and can't do any fixing, all he can do is delete. What a joke (UTC)	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,474,320	Although it mentions that he is the first Tamil scribe to meet with Irom Sharmila Xmas 2013 it doesn't point out that it was only after his intervention that the Government of Manipur ended the 9 year illegal isolation order. Up till then anyone trying to meet with her had no idea of the process. They would go via friends or local NGOs who filtered all visits or would just be told it was impossible. Since his visit after the High Court was informed by the GoM that they were adopting hte Assam Prison Manual regulations for all prisoners the procedure to see Sharmila is as follows: You apply in person to the SSP Imphal Central Jail and fill in a form stating your name address prisoner you wish to see and purpose of visit. Then you pay a ten rupee admin fee and after a brief interview confirming what you are allowed to take with you and what you cannot you are either granted a chit for a twenty minute interview or you are given written reasons for refusal. If you press for written reasons this may change the official's mind. Otherwise it may be recorded if at all that you changed your mind. Visiting days are Mondays Wednesdays and Fridays for women prisoners in Manipur. She is kept at the JNIMS security ward some distance away from the main prison. Just that. He did what the HRLN had claimed that they were trying to do since 2006 and he was assisted by their lawyers but it was on his request 7 years later and I do not believe they would have done so without his persistence. I don't know how to sign things my name is Desmond Coutinho, Irom Sharmila's fiancee.	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,481,779	the article gives undue weight of relevance. this is a joke posted on some magazine, and article treats it as legitimate subject. while spaghetti monster is a subject which is referenced sufficiently to make it relevant, this one-time joke is not. probably the whole article should be scrapped, or at best merged with spaghetti monster or some other article. treatment of this one-way joke is absolutely out of proportion to its (i)relevance.	2,014	false	article	blocked	test	false
620,486,160	::Probably because some wannabe NASA crackpots keep removing valid info. This page is a shed for nasty POV pushers.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,493,224	::I arrive to the same conclusions. Many thanks.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,505,091	` == A problem with ``English Patriot Man`` and his sockpuppets == Hi. Lately I've seen you blocking some sockpuppets of a user named: ``English Patriot Man``. I see that this man is nearly obsessed with Polish people. He seems to spread his anti-Polish propaganda by distorting the historical truth concerning World War II, nazism in Europe and racism against Poles. He is totally denying the sufferings of the Polish nation. Thank you so much for taking care of him, and taking care of the articles that are his main targets. However, now he might create another sock and log in from some other computer or place, so that his personal data and IP address would be totally different. This is why I suggest us to patrol the articles that are his main targets like: * Racism in Poland * Racial policy of Nazi Germany * War crimes in occupied Poland during World War II * Nazi crimes against the Polish nation * Invasion of Poland * Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II * Nazism and race * Untermensch * Master race * White supremacy * Racial hygiene * Nuremberg Laws * Aryan race * Aryanization * Aryan paragraph * Honorary Aryan * White nationalism * Holocaust victims * Racial_segregation * Nazi Germany * Persecution of black people in Nazi Germany * Occupation of Poland (1939–45) * Polish decrees * Kidnapping of children by Nazi Germany * Forced labour under German rule during World War II * Extermination through labor * Anti-Polish sentiment * Anti-Slavic sentiment * Polish question * Polish joke * Ahnenpass * Anschluss * Lebensraum * Rassenschande * Adolf Hitler * Nazism * Racism * Scientific racism * Themes in Nazi propaganda * Germanisation * Reverse racism * Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world * Glossary of Nazi Germany This guy is using multiple sockpuppet accounts to delete all the information about Poles being percieved as ``subhumans`` or ``non-Aryans`` by the nazis. In fact the only ``Aryan-looking`` Poles that were accepted by Nazi Germany at the time, were kidnapped as children and underwent ``Germanisation``, they were like 0.05% of the whole nation. The rest of the Poles were ``insufficient`` to be a part of the nazi-ruled nation, and were treated only slightly better that the Jews. This guy, he spreads lies all across Wikipedia, therefore I thank you for your quick and effective actions Diannaa. If you'd need any kind of help in restoring the data which ``English Patriot Man`` destroyed, just tell me. I will also try to patrol the articles about Poles. `	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
620,541,278	== Blackpool == Given the players were named in the match day squad - as per the referenced BBC article they have squad numbers - why have you removed my edit? One player is now notable under WP:GNG as well as he made his Football League debut towards the end of the match.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,584,212	Comments about C.Fred== Your edits make no sense, your acting like god, just deleting whatever you want, what's wrong with you. ==	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
620,584,298	Your a fucking bitch faced fuck head asshole mother fucker shit breath bitch.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
620,584,336	:Thank you, Go. Your attention and consideration are greatly appreciated. I perceive that the forceful intervention and excellent advice and direction provided by on Talk:Historicity of Jesus have done much to address the particulars of the concerns I have expressed, and tried to resolve, as per the procedures and policies as I have grown to understand them.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
620,585,120	Take everything you have written here and shove it, onto the Historicity of Jesus talk page, where has outlined a solution that I encourage you to participate in. Constant Wikilawyering, whinging and polemics ad nauseum, are quite literally turning my stomach. You have been given a great opportunity to participate in a crisp, clean, managed discussion of the issues. Continuing to bicker resolves nothing. I await your response and contribution to the efforts being made by many others to participate in a rational debate as co-equal partners, on the talk pages.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
620,586,617	== source dump == http://online.wsj.com/articles/rock-n-rolls-company-town-1407452570?mod=_newsreel_4	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,592,001	== fixed a number of errors == There were a number of errors in the article, where, in spite of linking to articles, whoever wrote it misquoted the article and published things that were quite simply false. I corrected them, giving the article a more neutral and more accurate tone. You can see my changes in the history. There shouldn't be any need for more edits until the decision is made on 11 September, unless we want to get more detailed.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,592,311	== Request for HelenOnline to cease editing this article == I am going to request that HelenOnline stay out of this article. Per above, I note that she has caused many problems in trying to control this article. It is better if others who are more neutral and accurate take control. Thanks. Helen, I am requesting that you voluntarily watch from the sidelines here.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
620,598,614	Dear User:Bbb23, I am writing to inform you that my cousin used my computer to create an account, and that it was not me who created a puppet account here on wikipedia. Oh and may I ask you, how do you report on users? I want to report on User:Balthazarduju for edit warring and User:Cold_Season for edit warring and also, a possible sock puppet account of User:Balthazarduju.	2,014	true	user	blocked	dev	false
620,598,673	Stop being such an ahole and actually read what I have to say you fing re**d.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	true
620,604,731	` :I approve this message. Xermano is my new main. `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,615,318	::Per the talk page, HelenOnline has been a major disruption for the article's neutrality. I call for her to voluntarily stop editing this page. Her latest edits, in addition to her earlier edits, have been very destructive to this page.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,633,415	REDIRECT Talk:DiscoveryCube Orange County	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,658,533	::::::On the contrary, per WP:OWN, HelenOnline is doing the wrong thing by Wikipedia. She is controlling this article. I have only edited for a day or two, I am not trying to control things. I just want her to stop destroying the article, adding in things that are wrong. Check it out. She was 100% wrong with every single thing she said.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,659,499	::No harassment by me, only by HelenOnline. NeilN warned for harassing innocent constructive editor while trying to encourage HelenOnline to control article, pushing false view of situation.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
620,659,580	If you are a moderator, you are a poor excuse for one. Please stay out of things that you aren't bothering to investigate. I am the good guy here.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
620,660,357	`article. Per above, I note that she has caused many problems in trying to control this article. It is better if others who are more neutral and accurate take control. Thanks. Helen, I am requesting that you voluntarily watch from the sidelines here. : I don't see her trying to control the article, she made a few reverts based on valid policy concerns. Phrases like ``shouldn't be any need for more edits`` may seem like you dictating the terms and trying to control the article. Expecting someone to stay out of editing an article is counterproductive in a collaborative encyclopedia especially if the other user is concerned about policies like WP:BLP. That being said, if you disagree with any of her edits, engage on the talk page like you've been doing already, argue your case and gain a consensus if the changes are controversial. Regards, ::Per the talk page, HelenOnline has been a major disruption for the article's neutrality. I call for her to voluntarily stop editing this page. Her latest edits, in addition to her earlier edits, have been very destructive to this page. :::Absolutely not. Any more unfounded requests like this will be treated as harassment.`	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,660,627	::I am harassing nobody. Check the history. HelenOnline is a major abuser on that article, has added in huge amounts of inaccurate information, controlled the article, and harassed multiple editors. You should be defending me!!!! Let her speak for herself. All I am asking is that she back away from this, to allow level-headed neutral people to edit it, so that her bias isn't there. There is no way that that is anything close to harassment. Your behaviour, on the other hand, is clearly abusive and bullying. Please stop it.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
620,660,910	:::Good job for having your bully NeilN defend you. You sure are a piece of work. Goodbye Wikipedia, congratulations, you will never be accurate while you behave like this. All I did was add accurate information. Helen, hang your head in shame, in serious, severe shame. I hope that you see the level of harm you have done, even if NeilN doesn't because his head is too far up his own backside to actually check any facts.	2,014	false	user	blocked	train	false
620,661,198	:::So ban me, bully. Wield your banhammer for great justice. Get your kicks out of it. And don't bother to check any facts at all. I am sure you feel really good for defending someone who you presume is female. What would happen if Helen was male? Would you still blindly defend someone who was adding in inaccurate information if they were male? What if I was female? You don't know. I could be a supermodel. Anyway, enjoy your power trip. Wikipedia is so terrible. Wikipedia doesn't care about accurate information. All they care about are people like you on massive power trips. So go ahead, feel good about yourself. It doesn't change the truth at all. Just makes you look bad.	2,014	false	user	blocked	dev	true
620,663,783	The Move/Split proposal simply addresses the problem of organizing the information that we already have. Nothing is being concealed and there's no issue of censorship. The recent changes are not of concern with this specific matter; first proposed the split several years ago - see above. The suggestion is simply to try and structure things a bit better. As the article states, there were about 300 of these institutions around the world, but most of our material concerns less than 20 of them. It's not a POV fork, since the proposed summary section for Ireland in the current main article would presumably include some info about the latest Irish situation along with suitable references, and the pointer to detailed information in the new article. If anything, it's a split along geographic lines - see WP:IMBALANCE.	2,014	true	article	random	test	false
620,673,207	REDIRECT Talk:Jaime (1974 film)	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,699,364	: I actually left you two messages when I reviewed your submission. The canned system message asks that you provide references to establish notability and that appears to be what your addressing. More importantly and specifically I added a comment suggesting you have a look at WP:AUTHOR. There are specific and more rigorous notability requirements for authors documented on that page and I did not believe this submission met those requirements. The references currently in the article merely demonstrate that she's a published author with a body of work. It is not clear to me that these new references go beyond that but I encourage you to add them to the article and resubmit it. Don't be afraid of it being rejected and don't take it personally if it is. ~	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,719,311	` == Skepticism regarding the existence of ISIS == Hi there. Perhaps I'm behind the times though I do try to keep up with the ``news`` and with ``global`` events, but, I get the feeling that ISIS does not really exist. Just as there is an excellent chance that Al-Qaeda does not really exist. I was especially inspired to post this comment when I saw in the first paragraph of this article use the neologism ``jihadist``. It doesn't take much brain power to know that there is no one in the world, besides maybe a few deeply stupid solo acts who keep up with thew western media, who refer to themselves as ``jihadists``. That is a habit of english speaking people to combine two words from different languages -in this case, arabic and english. Similarly, there is no centralized organization known as the Taliban, no organization or action known as ``Islamist`` no organization known as al-Qaeda. Notice also, that even the purported mission of ``ISIS`` is not Islamic in its nature. I know what folks want to ask: then how is it that words like jihadist, islamist, taliban, al-qaeda, and ISIS exist? Its called orientailsim. The Palestinian scholar Edward Said wrote extensively on the history of english speaking people, and other imperialists, who purposely attack and misrepresent Muslim peoples. It started with the Crusades. I don't mean to be a no it all, but ought we just believe what we are told? Is there a way to find empirical evidence that they do exist? If they do exist -what are we talking about? A few people who never studied Shariah in the first place. 10 August, 2014`	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
620,722,557	:: And where exactly in that LINK (Dienekes article) are these figures posted ?	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,768,034	I have removed the last sentence in the investment banking section where it states the Wall Street Journal collaborating with Dealogic to create bank scorecards. It does not contribute any relevant information to benefit readers and it is off topic from investment banking. This is a quick and dirty marketing ploy from one of the aforementioned companies to gain more exposure. Furthermore, the link to the reference does not exist, thus taking away the credibility of their claim and strengthening the assumption that it is an advertising scheme.	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,771,977	== Twelfth Doctor for Series 9 == All posted in the past couple of days... Worth adding? http://seriable.com/doctor-series-9-capaldi-confirmed/ http://www.spoilertv.com/2014/08/doctor-who-season-9-confirmed-with.html http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/capaldi-already-signed-for-series-9-65237.htm http://www.thegallifreytimes.co.uk/2014/08/capaldi-confirmed-for-series-9.html http://www.virginmedia.com/tvradio/news/story/2014/08/08/peter-capaldi-extends-doctor/	2,014	false	article	blocked	train	false
620,782,836	` == A barnstar for you! == {\| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` \|rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` \| \|style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` \| The Tireless Contributor Barnstar \|- \|style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` \| Salaam! Great job brother! \|}`	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
620,785,334	` :I don't see how ``offensive`` the article is to you Darkmax. And please, take your biases elsewhere. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
620,806,740	== Definitions == While I disagree with Martin Shaw's definition of genocide, and hence his conclusions about ethnic cleansing; on page 50 of his book there is a useful academic review of definitions that might help improve the definitions section. *	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
620,816,521	` : I'm sorry, are you the director, writer or producer of the film? Are you solely in charge of this page? Have you seen this movie? The actors listed on the SIDE> of a film's page are listed according to billing. Any actors in the film can be listed on the film's cast list on the page. (see ANY film's page on Wikipedia) so I don't understand how you think that other actors in the film are not ``notable`` when they appear in the film in prominent roles. The whole first half of the movie is Young Philomena played by Sophie Kennedy Clark. You don't have have the actor listed who plays her son, when the movie is about...Philomena finding her son. I will be adding the cast back to the list and do not remove them. I only added a few more actors that have prominent screen time, not every actor billed on IMBD. `	2,014	true	article	blocked	dev	false
620,834,006	== Trying to silence others because you disagree with them == Yeah, that's not how Wikipedia is supposed to operate. Your incivility in trying to silence me because you disagree with me will be reported if you persist. Remember: just because you disagree with someone is no reason to attempt to get that person blocked. In fact: that violates WP:BATTLEGROUND. So please: desist in your effort to silence me simply because you disagree with me. -	2,014	true	user	blocked	test	false
620,840,304	? Your link doesn't include that information, maybe wrong URL	2,014	true	article	random	dev	false
620,841,869	` == Character Names == :this list does not include the names of the characters that the actresses were nominated for, which is a huge part of any list of nominations for acting. Can we please form a consensus that the characters names are an important and missing part of this ``Featured List`` (the article had the character names before, but the creator of the list will not add them without consensus). `	2,014	true	article	blocked	test	false
620,864,125	` == Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Zulufive == Hello Zulufive. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Zulufive, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not apply to user talk pages. Thank you. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false
620,870,413	::If Fred had never been in The Munsters, he might have been most famous for Car 54 Where Are You? where he was only slightly less dense than Herman Munster. Kind of like with Bob Denver, whose Gilligan was his most famous role, but it was little more than Maynard G. Krebs lost at sea (in more ways than one). Robin did a lot of things, but Mork and Mindy is the one they always seem to go back to when talking about Robin. ← '''' →	2,014	true	article	blocked	train	false
620,888,651	The answer is simple. Appeal to the Board of Trustees to reverse Erik's bad behavior. Also request that they instruct staff not to implement technology changes without the consent of the Community, and that they remove Erik from a customer-facing role. If the Board fails to execute these policies: Now they will elect a new [Board]... a strong [Board]. One who will not let this tragedy continue.	2,014	false	user	blocked	test	false
620,906,829	` == Your request at Files for upload == Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:State School, Daylesford.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, '''''''''' `	2,014	true	user	random	dev	false
620,911,855	== Nishadas being the same as the Nicchabis in the Manusamhita == As with so many ancient peoples, they are probably also known under varying names such as the Licchavis, Nisibis, and the Nysioi of Arrian and Megasthenes.	2,014	false	article	blocked	dev	false
620,912,343	== Winds of change == Maybe one of these will cheer you up.	2,014	true	user	blocked	train	false
620,914,758	` == == Should we do something about (or as he apparently wants to rename himself to), since he's been disruptively editing his userpage(s) ever since that edit at 2015 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series, which is weird since he was a constructive editor before then. Should a block be placed? `	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,923,196	` :I don't have an exact timeline for ``correction`` of this perceived ``abuse`` of the system, but this sort of thing was common in the world then. English bought and sold ranks in the Army; they were listed in the newspaper ``For sale!`` Getting a post could be a problem! ) But you automatically got half-pay for sitting around doing nothing! :The government supported the church. The often well-to-do major landowner of the surrounding area had influence on who was appointed (if you're American, think Polly Harrington in the book or film ``Pollyanna (1960 film)``). Duties varied since the population varied. There were probably ``livings`` where they reasonably shouldn't have placed a congregation, but to remove it would deprive rural Anglicans of churchgoing. Livings weren't necessarily permanent. The clergy could be replaced so the political situation had to be taken into account. Think of William Collins in Pride and Prejudice (1995 TV series). :Morals analysis changed. Perception of ``abuse`` changed as well. It wasn't considered ``crooked`` but just normal procedure at the time. :Having said that, this information should be somewhere, but probably not in this article. An Anglican church article? Kind of touches on it in Curate#Anglican_Communion. `	2,014	true	article	random	train	false
620,928,667	::::::You must have forgotten TAURUS! In my experience, developing rubbish can be very time-consuming.	2,014	true	user	random	train	false
620,934,969	` == File:Hooj 3drives.jpg listed for deletion == A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hooj 3drives.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. `	2,014	true	user	random	test	false

620,035,393

== DRN escalation recommendation to ANI and Mediation re Historicity of Jesus == Just FYI *[ANI request] *[Mediation request]

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

620,038,407

`:I don't know if I'm identifying a problem that isn't there, but I worry the ``contemporary Armenian sources`` might be open to misunderstanding. Of course what it means is ``sources written by persons who were alive at the time Mashtots was alive`` - but do you think readers will know that is what it means? Is there another, clearer, way of saying it, but more concise than my explanation of what contemporary means. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,040,512

== Inclusion of Inuit Creation myths == Is there space in this article for inclusion of Inuit perspectives on their origins?

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,049,031

` == Classic == Jimmy Wales stated, ``We need to maintain and improve our quality standards, while at the same time remaining open, friendly, and welcoming as a community. This is a challenge.`` Wikipedia's co-founder Larry Sanger characterizes the Wikipedia community as ineffective and abusive, stating that ``The community does not enforce its own rules effectively or consistently. Consequently, administrators and ordinary participants alike are able essentially to act abusively with impunity, which begets a never-ending cycle of abuse.`` Oliver Kamm, of The Times expressed skepticism toward Wikipedia's reliance on consensus in forming its content: ``Wikipedia seeks not truth but consensus, and like an interminable political meeting the end result will be dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices.``Wisdom? More like dumbness of the crowds | Oliver Kamm – Times Online (archive version 2011-08-14) (Author’s own copy) The complaints related to the community include the effects of users' anonymity, the attitudes towards newcomers, the abuse of privileges by administrators, biases in the social structure of the community, in particular, gender bias and lack of female contributors, Sounds like they are talking about this article. Good thing some of us are loud and persistent in our calls for neutrality and balance. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,051,235

Polemics, rehashing old claims, fighting over perceived biases and trying to blame each other for whatever will not solve this problem. I perceive that the fundamental premise of the dominant editors holds that any critique of the prevalent analysis in this article must begin and end within the terms set by the proponents of that analysis. This is not logical. To elucidate and support an alternative proposition is not bound by any other disciplines a priori, asserted or even purported evidentiary claims to knowledge. Historical-critical biblical theologians have no automatic nor exclusive claim to authority in this matter. Neutrality in this instance is clear. The article must provide context to the reader about the question, show the various positions and approaches taken in different fields, and ensure that no single claim to exclusive authority or evocation of essentially meaningless and conflictual universal generalisations is present. It can not possibly be any clearer. The article is fundamentally flawed in two ways 1)claims to exclusive authority and 2) circular and self-referential evidentiary support. If we welcome a diversity of perspectives, educate the reader, and all show more respect and dignity to each other we will surely end up with one heck of a great article. What do you think?

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,056,196

== Umm == Dumb ass noob here with my dick stuck in a bear trap with a coven of evil warlocks breathing down my neck intent on my utter destruction and making me sad too boot, and hateful of my self. But hurting others, so I must act. I guess. Help? Advice! Hug? Slap, a la Patton?

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

620,057,879

== Thanks == Greetings. I wanted to thank you about the good job with . It was swift and efficient. (People might have told you that it was not perfect because you paid too much attention to unimportant details; maybe, but overall, there was a lot of wisdom and teamwork in the whole thing.)

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,074,211

|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or *the block is no longer necessary because you *#understand what you have been blocked for, *#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and *#will make useful contributions instead. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

620,135,691

` == File:Tom Carstairs In Concert.jpg == Given the possibility of timed camera shutters and the consequent possibility of photographing oneself, this is clearly not a blatant copyright infringement, so a DRV will be filed should you leave the closure as ``delete``. It would be advisable if, in the future, you would refrain from assuming that others had failed to investigate the situation, for I at least did investigate, or I would have deleted it or advocated deletion. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

620,138,588

Split up When did they split up? 1999 was the last single release ever. Probably disestablished in 2000?

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

620,147,908

|politician-work-group = yes|listas=Day, Chris

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,151,314

` are you a troll? why are you accusing me that i ``blank articles`` and nominate a page that was edited from this ip some time ago, while a brief check of previous nomination shows that it is completely bogus?`

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

true

620,156,922

:: What request? I asked a question. Let me do so again. How does that work again? And, since when is a clique a person? And in what manner does a neutral statement become an attack? Oh, and I have not asked to be unblocked. As it stands. This would be the only place to discuss the concerns I original brought to DRN and that they told me to refer to ANI. I perceive that these are still not being addressed.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

620,164,937

::::You absolutely do not come across as pious. Thank you for your counsel. At this point, in this forum, my request for ANI support, made at the direction of DRN, to resolve the questions brought here were ignored, and reflexively and immediately turned into a different issue. The decision to block was made outside of the procedures that I understand should take place (engagement of the relevant editors, inquiry, debate, mediation, etc..). All the editors who agreed to mediate a solution on MEDCOM and the external review request and the Talk page of the article are being blocked. All the months and months of abuse of process and people by the little cabal of editors at question are being allowed to continue. As long as I remain blocked the question remains: why? Because of an investigation into the issues presented? After careful inquiry? After an attempt to connect to all the editors concerned? These have not happened. Instead I have been blocked on the testimony of two of the culpable parties, about whom, nothing, again, once more as usual, has been done. I am proud to be blocked. It reminds me, and others, that there is a problem. It also reminds me that I have more to do with my life then debate post-grads lost in the fervour of their self-righteous belief in the perfection of their discipline. (That's not you by the way) Thanks for your support. Good luck. Don't give up. Keep watching these pages.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

620,174,972

I did not see you message, sorry! I have resubmitted the article right now, please check. Thank you!

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

620,191,365

This page with the DVD of the series is the only one that I can find at the moment.

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,213,355

== referencing sources == You should take care to reference you sources properly. Use the templates. This is what a proper reference supposed to look like: {{cite news| url=http://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/news/29455981/vvp-rossii-v-pervom-polugodii-vyros-na-1-minekonomrazvitiya |publisher=[[Vedomosti]]| title=ВВП России в первом полугодии вырос на 1% — Минэкономразвития| date=27 July 2014|accessdate=7 August 2014|language=Russian}} I'm not going to fix it for you. Also, please don't stuff this article with irrelevant, outdated and inaccurate information. I made a lot of effort to clean it up.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

620,216,621

== 's behaviour == There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

620,235,022

Powers of Disallowance and Reservation]] [1938] SCR 71 (followed by Reference re Alberta Statutes) # :: [[Reference re

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

620,241,628

Mahan, as a young son of a poor Irish immigrant in Virginia was educated by Michael de Lacy when their were no public schools in Virginia.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

620,253,180

== Proposal: Going back to the bare bones again == Until this article is deleted as it should have been originally barring admin incompetence, I propose going back to this version, which is the cut-down version deliberately edited. # The amount of text is more proportionate to his notability. There isn't much point in having pages and pages of material on somebody who is entirely unnotable. # The article doesn't go into detail about the obvious (and well-discussed) problems - it just ignores them. ** This seems to be the best option for BLP reasons. ** This also seems to be the best option in the light of the fact that this article is being edited by people who fundamentally don't understand the problems that we have. ** ''It also solves the problem of avoiding interpretation of sources which is sailing closer to WP:NOR.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,255,101

::How is it known that they originate from Israelite tribes if they don't know how they arrived. Where is the evidence? The reference that claims they descended from Israelite tribes is also broken.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,259,638

and the Outside Hitter is 35

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,268,219

`There are many more linguistic features that are exclusively shared with Italic (mostly Sabellic) but non existing in Keltic (not going to waste my time listing all of them) Your the ``expert`` so keep on truckin and always remember if you `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,279,226

== Dispute resolution notice RE:Retrospective diagnoses of autism and WikiProject tags == This is a notification to inform you that a discussion has been added to the dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a dispute you may be involved in. *Direct link: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Retrospective_diagnoses_of_autism

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,280,159

` :::::: Oh Mr. Blaschke dot get too emotional just because i called your boyfriend an ``expert`` LOL; Pala/Palam has a known etymology and it is *palso- (Latin:sepelio Umbrian:pelsa-) meaning Tombstone/Rock and equivalent to the Gaelic 'All' (notice no *p); do not get to full of rage just because you and your dear boyfriend look like cows in the rain and have 'NO clue; proper experts LOL; PS: you claim to be from Bavaria but your last-name is Polish; `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

620,280,405

As for uvamokozis LOL thank you for the punchline

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,281,457

:::::: And btw i already know that you and your crew of intimate experts have NO clue concerning Archaeology you do not have to repeat it over and over; But it is Archaeologically impossible for a people (Insubres where the majority of inscriptions were found) of the Golasecca culture (12th century BC Urnfield group) to have been anything other than Italic;

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,282,072

`PPS: If the relevance of the Insubres here is truly unclear for you than i seriously suggest you inform yourself about the topic; Because after such a statement only pathetic and sad come to mind concerning you and your crew of ``experts``; `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,288,340

` == Should Glenn Curtiss's 1907 record be included == In 1907 Glenn Curtiss set a speed record on a motorcycle which was faster than the then current car record. Since this article is ``land speed record`` and not ``automobile speed record``, it seems like the Curtiss record should be included (albeit with a note in the comments that the record was not recognized by the French, same as the Ford 999 record).`

2,014

false

article

random

train

false

620,288,562

` == Arbitrary lists are NEVER a good idea == Hi, I removed the lists as it was becoming a magnet for original research. When can have lists of concrete things (like ``Cities in the Republic of Ireland``, ``Fellows of the National Academy of Sciences``, ``chemical elements``. Open-ended lists, especially those having a strong element of subjectivity, such as ``the most important Fellows of the National Academy of Sciences``, ``cities with the best pubs in Ireland``, ``my favourite chemical elements`` or ``most prominent autistic savants`` are never a good idea. So it's been removed. Thanks for your understanding. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

620,290,246

` :This is clearly the same person as , and the various IP editors all of whom have made variations on the same edits. :Note that used the terms ``pagans`` just like Islamthetruth123 in his edits to the article on the Battle of Hunayn: Bdbbfbfbfb's edit, Islamthetruth123's edit. :I suspect that what we are dealing with is an individual with multiple identities on Wikipedia. :His/her being the same person as Islamthetruth123 is legitimate - that account was blocked and they were told to get a new ID. :I do not think that he/she can be reported to any forum just yet. The answer is to revert giving an explanation in the edit summary, and template them every time you revert them. That way they build up a nice selection of warnings, which often attracts admin attention and results in a block if the admin thinks your behaviour is justified. `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,294,504

*OIC, the file extension has to be jpeg and not jpg.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

620,295,571

` Dear Colleagues, I thank the various administrators and editors for their patience, and for their comments here, on the various talk pages and by email. Many comments have been made about procedural failures. Each of my steps in the dispute resolution process is prefaced with a request for advice and direction about how to do this properly, as I note here, because I did not know how to request, or manage, an ANI conduct review or MEDCOM mediation properly. A decision to block me was made, which I will not contest, based on comprehensive notes from two editors and accusations that I provide no evidence. I did not know how or when to do so, but I am learning quickly. In regard to arguments made by the editors and , above, and upon which a decision was made to block me, I respond as follows: # I reviewed a long history of contentious discussion and edits in Historicity of Jesus. # I then posted a bold sourced here, which I encourage you to examine. You may see that they are in some cases minor clarifications, in others short simple neutrally toned presentations of divergent academic perspectives. In each instance the sources provided, apply only to the conceptual background of the claims made, and do not pertain to the specific line by line claims of this article, because, the citations largely concern the framework of the discussion not its extensive particulars. # I started a talk page discussion # Smeat75 reverted my edit without discussion here # Smeat75 responded to my talk page discussion, but did not address the reasoning for the revision, here # I continued discussion on the talk page and reverted back my edits here # Ian.thomson reverted my edit with note of ``You must develop consensus`` here # I reverted with note ````Local consensus`` is opposed by Wikipedia:Editing policy. Wait for external review.`` here # I requested external review at WP:RFC and continued discussion on the Talk page here # Ian.thomson reverted the edit I requested review on, again, here # External review collapsed as editors ignored process and comments from external parties # I had been following what I knew of appropriate policy and felt I was being repeatedly reverted without discussion or attempts to communicate, so... # I then requested Dispute Resolution here, please read ``dispute overview`` # Dispute resolution was opened, great comments received from many editors, and closed unresolved, as explained here # On advice of DRN I applied to ANI for advice on resolution of conduct conflicts here, and to MEDCOM for content mediation here # MEDCOM opened the request, 5 editors to date have agreed to mediation # ANI administrator then blocked me without addressing my request for advice, nor making inquiries with me and apparently based solely on the comments of two editors about which I have conduct concerns. My specific conduct concerns, about some editors, are outlined below. # flagrant misrepresentation and exaggeration of proposed edits and propositions as here, here, here, here, here, and here # claiming group consensus, here,here, here when there is no consensus at all, as explicitly noted here and by the POV tag, and evidenced by ongoing edit suggestions such as these,here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here coming from many different editors during the course of this conflict. # ignoring requests to communicate as here # insults and harassment as found here, here and discussed here, and extensively discussed here # Accusations of mental deficiency, incompetence, bigotry, hypocrisy etc as [here, here, here, here, here, here and here # editing other users talk comments as noted here # multiple unsubstantiated accusations or insinuations of sock puppetry as here, and Ian.Thompson here and here and 2 others here and here Note: there may be overlapping references above. Due to the nature of the discussion, different types of egregious behaviour are mixed together within individual comments. These activities have been long term, systematic and continuous. They go back months into the Talk page archive. I asked for advice on how to deal with this, and have been blocked for not knowing how to deal with this. As I have learned how this entire processes works, I have attempted to conform to the various procedural requirements, on the fly. If I had known how, and that, I needed to provide this level of detail, I would have already done so, after learning how to. Now I have. My apologies for my ignorance, and the lateness of this material. regards `

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

620,320,363

::Yes, I saw that, but look at the edit that WhisperToMe links to: it's dated July 27th. whisperToMe undoubtedly had a reason to post on the IP's talk page, but the reason wasn't necessarily recent vandalism, and it didn't necessarily require reporting to AIV. Or WhisperToMe could've simply been mistaken; it happens to the best of us. The point is that reports to AIV should be for recent behavior, and you should make sure that there is, in fact, recent behavior to reportby checking the user's contributionsbefore making it.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,338,330

== Stop your nonsense. == It is clear that you lack the intelligence to know and identify famous historical han chinese people, so you edited the han chinese page and changed the infobox, changing a famous scientist like Zhang Heng to an actress that nobody in the world cares.

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

true

620,347,740

== User:ImiBill == Hi! I just got back from a trip, so my apologies for not responding sooner. ImiBill's explanation seems reasonable - I'm aware that LifeVantage hired CastleKing1440 to post an article using copy that they had provided, and it was subsequently posted by a definite duck. The job remained (and remains) ongoing. It is possible that ImiBill was employed independent of CastleKing1440 prior to CastleKing1440's contract, and they returned to post the article even though CastleKing1440 was still employed to post it. I'm not opposed to unblocking, although their contributions raise some separate red flags. -

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,351,738

== You started it. == LOL, there would not have been an edit war' if there were no participants, that includes you and your other account, Balthazarduju. So bring it on.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

620,352,136

Reply to reply to I changed the photo for a reason

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

620,352,508

It doesn't mean if infoboxes of other ethnic groups' wiki pages that don't have an object to represent someone means the han chinese infobox must not have an object representing a person. You make no sense in your argument you stupid asshole. ~

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

620,352,752

Holy shit shut the f*** up you motherf*** c***!

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

620,383,959

:Hi Cutest Penguin! Sorry but I don't know anything about this topic.

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

620,387,871

==why you delete == $800,000 in improvements started at the 800-foot-long, deep-water dock that is to accommodate cruise ships ....... you don't a like a salem you a stick up for a da stalker onhitsajamie

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

620,390,960

:::::HBD bloggers aren't part of the American establishment bought out by self-perpetuating Boasian Marxist Jews and so parroting them may threaten Maunus' paycheck.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,397,254

== Ukrainian parliament sources claim over 10,000 killed in Donbas, including thousands of Ukrainian soldiers == http://rt.com/news/179048-ten-thousand-killed-ukraine/ Now, it is known that hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers have been confirmed to have got killed in Donbas. This is when their bodies are recovered from areas of battle. However, most of the time, bodies are not recovered and soldiers are listed as missing. It is not published how many Ukrainian soldiers are missing.

2,014

false

article

random

dev

false

620,413,487

:Yes, there was criticism in the article, suggesting evaporation as the source of the thurst. However, it was (together with all criticisms) removed/censored by POV pushing editors. No control for mass was done in either experiment, and evaporation of order of less than microgram per second could easily explain the effect (especially in the NASA case); even more so, if there is some moisture. What you are essentially doing, is microwaving the interior of a cone, and - surprise surprise - there is a small force in the opposite direction. Then you turn off the heating, but your interior is still at higher temperature, measure it again, and there is still a force - yet smaller. Nothing to do with exotic physics, everything to do with experimental error due to unforeseen effect of evaporation, i.e. ablation (though some moisture might play an effect, especially if there are parts other than metal; this is, in my opinion, the most likely explanation - EM radiation cannot cause such effect at these power/force ratios (that part was also removed from the article, though all was sourced). So, if there is no some weird effect (and QED effects, virtual plasma included, boil down to EM radiation reaction, there is no violation of impulse conservation there, so that is excluded too), it should be reaction from some loss of mass - and evaporation is an obvious source. However, they did not check for that. Also, some of experiments were done in atmosphere (at atmospheric pressure, even in chamber?! according to brief paper), so other possibility is interaction with heated air. However, in vacuum, ablation seems to be most likely explanation. Why all this sourced material and all criticism was removed, beats me.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,415,624

` :: The deletion process really want fubar on this one. Admin whose name I can't remember, unilaterally closed it choosing to ignore the WP:BLP and WP:MINOR policy issues, and the fact that the delete calls were coming from experienced Wikipedians and the keeps from obsessed fanboys. The ``review`` then was then a shoulder shrug which made reference to ``interesting arguments`` but didn't apparently consider those aguments in detail. 's assertion that the article is bullet proof because it ``survived AFD and DRV`` is pure fantasy. It is still a problematic BLP of a minor (not that some people understand this). `

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,416,647

OH AND HCERE IS A LITTEL THING FOR YOU GIVE ME MORE AND I CAN EAT HOT FOOD CAN YOU I DO NOT THINK THAT YOU CAN AND IF YOU CAN CATCH ME AND I CAN OUT RUN YOU AND MAKE ME LOOSE MY BRETH AND HIT ME BABY ONE MORE TIME AND IF YOU DO YOU CAN HAVE ME ALL TO YOUIR SELF

2,014

false

article

random

train

false

620,421,091

- there is alas little point in becoming obsessive about someone who isn't important at all, such as this individual, as you have done. Given that the article has been deleted once already, and is clearly inconsistent with policy, and that the predictions made by some about Nobel Prizes etc are entirely absurd, it is clear that it will be deleted, preferably sooner rather than later. Arguing about this is I'm afraid rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,429,891

` Sorry, this does not seem like an RS to me. Sample of headlines from today: :*``Israelis Gather, Watch, Cheer, Celebrate Over 1,200 Dead in Gaza`` :*``Murdoch’s Media Monopoly: Are the Globalists Streamlining Their PR for WWIII?`` :*``Malaysian Airlines False Flag Scripting Straight Out of BBC’s ‘Sherlock’`` :*``Ex-Border Agent Says US Government ‘Facilitating’ Illegal Surge Scheme`` :I think it is fair to say this is just a FRINGE blog. `

2,014

false

article

random

train

false

620,456,501

Yes I know, that guy keeps reversing my properly sourced information just because he is on the mobile device and can't do any fixing, all he can do is delete. What a joke (UTC)

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,474,320

Although it mentions that he is the first Tamil scribe to meet with Irom Sharmila Xmas 2013 it doesn't point out that it was only after his intervention that the Government of Manipur ended the 9 year illegal isolation order. Up till then anyone trying to meet with her had no idea of the process. They would go via friends or local NGOs who filtered all visits or would just be told it was impossible. Since his visit after the High Court was informed by the GoM that they were adopting hte Assam Prison Manual regulations for all prisoners the procedure to see Sharmila is as follows: You apply in person to the SSP Imphal Central Jail and fill in a form stating your name address prisoner you wish to see and purpose of visit. Then you pay a ten rupee admin fee and after a brief interview confirming what you are allowed to take with you and what you cannot you are either granted a chit for a twenty minute interview or you are given written reasons for refusal. If you press for written reasons this may change the official's mind. Otherwise it may be recorded if at all that you changed your mind. Visiting days are Mondays Wednesdays and Fridays for women prisoners in Manipur. She is kept at the JNIMS security ward some distance away from the main prison. Just that. He did what the HRLN had claimed that they were trying to do since 2006 and he was assisted by their lawyers but it was on his request 7 years later and I do not believe they would have done so without his persistence. I don't know how to sign things my name is Desmond Coutinho, Irom Sharmila's fiancee.

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,481,779

the article gives undue weight of relevance. this is a joke posted on some magazine, and article treats it as legitimate subject. while spaghetti monster is a subject which is referenced sufficiently to make it relevant, this one-time joke is not. probably the whole article should be scrapped, or at best merged with spaghetti monster or some other article. treatment of this one-way joke is absolutely out of proportion to its (i)relevance.

2,014

false

article

blocked

test

false

620,486,160

::Probably because some wannabe NASA crackpots keep removing valid info. This page is a shed for nasty POV pushers.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,493,224

::I arrive to the same conclusions. Many thanks.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,505,091

` == A problem with ``English Patriot Man`` and his sockpuppets == Hi. Lately I've seen you blocking some sockpuppets of a user named: ``English Patriot Man``. I see that this man is nearly obsessed with Polish people. He seems to spread his anti-Polish propaganda by distorting the historical truth concerning World War II, nazism in Europe and racism against Poles. He is totally denying the sufferings of the Polish nation. Thank you so much for taking care of him, and taking care of the articles that are his main targets. However, now he might create another sock and log in from some other computer or place, so that his personal data and IP address would be totally different. This is why I suggest us to patrol the articles that are his main targets like: * Racism in Poland * Racial policy of Nazi Germany * War crimes in occupied Poland during World War II * Nazi crimes against the Polish nation * Invasion of Poland * Collaboration with the Axis Powers during World War II * Nazism and race * Untermensch * Master race * White supremacy * Racial hygiene * Nuremberg Laws * Aryan race * Aryanization * Aryan paragraph * Honorary Aryan * White nationalism * Holocaust victims * Racial_segregation * Nazi Germany * Persecution of black people in Nazi Germany * Occupation of Poland (1939–45) * Polish decrees * Kidnapping of children by Nazi Germany * Forced labour under German rule during World War II * Extermination through labor * Anti-Polish sentiment * Anti-Slavic sentiment * Polish question * Polish joke * Ahnenpass * Anschluss * Lebensraum * Rassenschande * Adolf Hitler * Nazism * Racism * Scientific racism * Themes in Nazi propaganda * Germanisation * Reverse racism * Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world * Glossary of Nazi Germany This guy is using multiple sockpuppet accounts to delete all the information about Poles being percieved as ``subhumans`` or ``non-Aryans`` by the nazis. In fact the only ``Aryan-looking`` Poles that were accepted by Nazi Germany at the time, were kidnapped as children and underwent ``Germanisation``, they were like 0.05% of the whole nation. The rest of the Poles were ``insufficient`` to be a part of the nazi-ruled nation, and were treated only slightly better that the Jews. This guy, he spreads lies all across Wikipedia, therefore I thank you for your quick and effective actions Diannaa. If you'd need any kind of help in restoring the data which ``English Patriot Man`` destroyed, just tell me. I will also try to patrol the articles about Poles. `

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

620,541,278

== Blackpool == Given the players were named in the match day squad - as per the referenced BBC article they have squad numbers - why have you removed my edit? One player is now notable under WP:GNG as well as he made his Football League debut towards the end of the match.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,584,212

Comments about C.Fred== Your edits make no sense, your acting like god, just deleting whatever you want, what's wrong with you. ==

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

620,584,298

Your a fucking bitch faced fuck head asshole mother fucker shit breath bitch.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

620,584,336

:Thank you, Go. Your attention and consideration are greatly appreciated. I perceive that the forceful intervention and excellent advice and direction provided by on Talk:Historicity of Jesus have done much to address the particulars of the concerns I have expressed, and tried to resolve, as per the procedures and policies as I have grown to understand them.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

620,585,120

Take everything you have written here and shove it, onto the Historicity of Jesus talk page, where has outlined a solution that I encourage you to participate in. Constant Wikilawyering, whinging and polemics ad nauseum, are quite literally turning my stomach. You have been given a great opportunity to participate in a crisp, clean, managed discussion of the issues. Continuing to bicker resolves nothing. I await your response and contribution to the efforts being made by many others to participate in a rational debate as co-equal partners, on the talk pages.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

620,586,617

== source dump == http://online.wsj.com/articles/rock-n-rolls-company-town-1407452570?mod=_newsreel_4

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,592,001

== fixed a number of errors == There were a number of errors in the article, where, in spite of linking to articles, whoever wrote it misquoted the article and published things that were quite simply false. I corrected them, giving the article a more neutral and more accurate tone. You can see my changes in the history. There shouldn't be any need for more edits until the decision is made on 11 September, unless we want to get more detailed.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,592,311

== Request for HelenOnline to cease editing this article == I am going to request that HelenOnline stay out of this article. Per above, I note that she has caused many problems in trying to control this article. It is better if others who are more neutral and accurate take control. Thanks. Helen, I am requesting that you voluntarily watch from the sidelines here.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

620,598,614

Dear User:Bbb23, I am writing to inform you that my cousin used my computer to create an account, and that it was not me who created a puppet account here on wikipedia. Oh and may I ask you, how do you report on users? I want to report on User:Balthazarduju for edit warring and User:Cold_Season for edit warring and also, a possible sock puppet account of User:Balthazarduju.

2,014

true

user

blocked

dev

false

620,598,673

Stop being such an a**hole and actually read what I have to say you f***ing re***d.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

true

620,604,731

` :I approve this message. Xermano is my new main. `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,615,318

::Per the talk page, HelenOnline has been a major disruption for the article's neutrality. I call for her to voluntarily stop editing this page. Her latest edits, in addition to her earlier edits, have been very destructive to this page.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,633,415

REDIRECT Talk:DiscoveryCube Orange County

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,658,533

::::::On the contrary, per WP:OWN, HelenOnline is doing the wrong thing by Wikipedia. She is controlling this article. I have only edited for a day or two, I am not trying to control things. I just want her to stop destroying the article, adding in things that are wrong. Check it out. She was 100% wrong with every single thing she said.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,659,499

::No harassment by me, only by HelenOnline. NeilN warned for harassing innocent constructive editor while trying to encourage HelenOnline to control article, pushing false view of situation.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

620,659,580

If you are a moderator, you are a poor excuse for one. Please stay out of things that you aren't bothering to investigate. I am the good guy here.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

620,660,357

`article. Per above, I note that she has caused many problems in trying to control this article. It is better if others who are more neutral and accurate take control. Thanks. Helen, I am requesting that you voluntarily watch from the sidelines here. : I don't see her trying to control the article, she made a few reverts based on valid policy concerns. Phrases like ``shouldn't be any need for more edits`` may seem like you dictating the terms and trying to control the article. Expecting someone to stay out of editing an article is counterproductive in a collaborative encyclopedia especially if the other user is concerned about policies like WP:BLP. That being said, if you disagree with any of her edits, engage on the talk page like you've been doing already, argue your case and gain a consensus if the changes are controversial. Regards, ::Per the talk page, HelenOnline has been a major disruption for the article's neutrality. I call for her to voluntarily stop editing this page. Her latest edits, in addition to her earlier edits, have been very destructive to this page. :::Absolutely not. Any more unfounded requests like this will be treated as harassment.`

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,660,627

::I am harassing nobody. Check the history. HelenOnline is a major abuser on that article, has added in huge amounts of inaccurate information, controlled the article, and harassed multiple editors. You should be defending me!!!! Let her speak for herself. All I am asking is that she back away from this, to allow level-headed neutral people to edit it, so that her bias isn't there. There is no way that that is anything close to harassment. Your behaviour, on the other hand, is clearly abusive and bullying. Please stop it.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

620,660,910

:::Good job for having your bully NeilN defend you. You sure are a piece of work. Goodbye Wikipedia, congratulations, you will never be accurate while you behave like this. All I did was add accurate information. Helen, hang your head in shame, in serious, severe shame. I hope that you see the level of harm you have done, even if NeilN doesn't because his head is too far up his own backside to actually check any facts.

2,014

false

user

blocked

train

false

620,661,198

:::So ban me, bully. Wield your banhammer for great justice. Get your kicks out of it. And don't bother to check any facts at all. I am sure you feel really good for defending someone who you presume is female. What would happen if Helen was male? Would you still blindly defend someone who was adding in inaccurate information if they were male? What if I was female? You don't know. I could be a supermodel. Anyway, enjoy your power trip. Wikipedia is so terrible. Wikipedia doesn't care about accurate information. All they care about are people like you on massive power trips. So go ahead, feel good about yourself. It doesn't change the truth at all. Just makes you look bad.

2,014

false

user

blocked

dev

true

620,663,783

The Move/Split proposal simply addresses the problem of organizing the information that we already have. Nothing is being concealed and there's no issue of censorship. The recent changes are not of concern with this specific matter; first proposed the split several years ago - see above. The suggestion is simply to try and structure things a bit better. As the article states, there were about 300 of these institutions around the world, but most of our material concerns less than 20 of them. It's not a POV fork, since the proposed summary section for Ireland in the current main article would presumably include some info about the latest Irish situation along with suitable references, and the pointer to detailed information in the new article. If anything, it's a split along geographic lines - see WP:IMBALANCE.

2,014

true

article

random

test

false

620,673,207

REDIRECT Talk:Jaime (1974 film)

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,699,364

: I actually left you two messages when I reviewed your submission. The canned system message asks that you provide references to establish notability and that appears to be what your addressing. More importantly and specifically I added a comment suggesting you have a look at WP:AUTHOR. There are specific and more rigorous notability requirements for authors documented on that page and I did not believe this submission met those requirements. The references currently in the article merely demonstrate that she's a published author with a body of work. It is not clear to me that these new references go beyond that but I encourage you to add them to the article and resubmit it. Don't be afraid of it being rejected and don't take it personally if it is. ~

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,719,311

` == Skepticism regarding the existence of ISIS == Hi there. Perhaps I'm behind the times though I do try to keep up with the ``news`` and with ``global`` events, but, I get the feeling that ISIS does not really exist. Just as there is an excellent chance that Al-Qaeda does not really exist. I was especially inspired to post this comment when I saw in the first paragraph of this article use the neologism ``jihadist``. It doesn't take much brain power to know that there is no one in the world, besides maybe a few deeply stupid solo acts who keep up with thew western media, who refer to themselves as ``jihadists``. That is a habit of english speaking people to combine two words from different languages -in this case, arabic and english. Similarly, there is no centralized organization known as the Taliban, no organization or action known as ``Islamist`` no organization known as al-Qaeda. Notice also, that even the purported mission of ``ISIS`` is not Islamic in its nature. I know what folks want to ask: then how is it that words like jihadist, islamist, taliban, al-qaeda, and ISIS exist? Its called orientailsim. The Palestinian scholar Edward Said wrote extensively on the history of english speaking people, and other imperialists, who purposely attack and misrepresent Muslim peoples. It started with the Crusades. I don't mean to be a no it all, but ought we just believe what we are told? Is there a way to find empirical evidence that they do exist? If they do exist -what are we talking about? A few people who never studied Shariah in the first place. 10 August, 2014`

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

620,722,557

:: And where exactly in that LINK (Dienekes article) are these figures posted ?

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,768,034

I have removed the last sentence in the investment banking section where it states the Wall Street Journal collaborating with Dealogic to create bank scorecards. It does not contribute any relevant information to benefit readers and it is off topic from investment banking. This is a quick and dirty marketing ploy from one of the aforementioned companies to gain more exposure. Furthermore, the link to the reference does not exist, thus taking away the credibility of their claim and strengthening the assumption that it is an advertising scheme.

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,771,977

== Twelfth Doctor for Series 9 == All posted in the past couple of days... Worth adding? http://seriable.com/doctor-series-9-capaldi-confirmed/ http://www.spoilertv.com/2014/08/doctor-who-season-9-confirmed-with.html http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/capaldi-already-signed-for-series-9-65237.htm http://www.thegallifreytimes.co.uk/2014/08/capaldi-confirmed-for-series-9.html http://www.virginmedia.com/tvradio/news/story/2014/08/08/peter-capaldi-extends-doctor/

2,014

false

article

blocked

train

false

620,782,836

` == A barnstar for you! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;`` | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Salaam! Great job brother! |}`

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

620,785,334

` :I don't see how ``offensive`` the article is to you Darkmax. And please, take your biases elsewhere. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

620,806,740

== Definitions == While I disagree with Martin Shaw's definition of genocide, and hence his conclusions about ethnic cleansing; on page 50 of his book there is a useful academic review of definitions that might help improve the definitions section. *

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

620,816,521

` : I'm sorry, are you the director, writer or producer of the film? Are you solely in charge of this page? Have you seen this movie? The actors listed on the SIDE> of a film's page are listed according to billing. Any actors in the film can be listed on the film's cast list on the page. (see ANY film's page on Wikipedia) so I don't understand how you think that other actors in the film are not ``notable`` when they appear in the film in prominent roles. The whole first half of the movie is Young Philomena played by Sophie Kennedy Clark. You don't have have the actor listed who plays her son, when the movie is about...Philomena finding her son. I will be adding the cast back to the list and do not remove them. I only added a few more actors that have prominent screen time, not every actor billed on IMBD. `

2,014

true

article

blocked

dev

false

620,834,006

== Trying to silence others because you disagree with them == Yeah, that's not how Wikipedia is supposed to operate. Your incivility in trying to silence me because you disagree with me will be reported if you persist. Remember: just because you disagree with someone is no reason to attempt to get that person blocked. In fact: that violates WP:BATTLEGROUND. So please: desist in your effort to silence me simply because you disagree with me. -

2,014

true

user

blocked

test

false

620,840,304

? Your link doesn't include that information, maybe wrong URL

2,014

true

article

random

dev

false

620,841,869

` == Character Names == :this list does not include the names of the characters that the actresses were nominated for, which is a huge part of any list of nominations for acting. Can we please form a consensus that the characters names are an important and missing part of this ``Featured List`` (the article had the character names before, but the creator of the list will not add them without consensus). `

2,014

true

article

blocked

test

false

620,864,125

` == Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Zulufive == Hello Zulufive. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Zulufive, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not apply to user talk pages. Thank you. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false

620,870,413

::If Fred had never been in The Munsters, he might have been most famous for Car 54 Where Are You? where he was only slightly less dense than Herman Munster. Kind of like with Bob Denver, whose Gilligan was his most famous role, but it was little more than Maynard G. Krebs lost at sea (in more ways than one). Robin did a lot of things, but Mork and Mindy is the one they always seem to go back to when talking about Robin. ← '''' →

2,014

true

article

blocked

train

false

620,888,651

The answer is simple. Appeal to the Board of Trustees to reverse Erik's bad behavior. Also request that they instruct staff not to implement technology changes without the consent of the Community, and that they remove Erik from a customer-facing role. If the Board fails to execute these policies: Now they will elect a new [Board]... a strong [Board]. One who will not let this tragedy continue.

2,014

false

user

blocked

test

false

620,906,829

` == Your request at Files for upload == Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:State School, Daylesford.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, '''''''''' `

2,014

true

user

random

dev

false

620,911,855

== Nishadas being the same as the Nicchabis in the Manusamhita == As with so many ancient peoples, they are probably also known under varying names such as the Licchavis, Nisibis, and the Nysioi of Arrian and Megasthenes.

2,014

false

article

blocked

dev

false

620,912,343

== Winds of change == Maybe one of these will cheer you up.

2,014

true

user

blocked

train

false

620,914,758

` == == Should we do something about (or as he apparently wants to rename himself to), since he's been disruptively editing his userpage(s) ever since that edit at 2015 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series, which is weird since he was a constructive editor before then. Should a block be placed? `

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,923,196

` :I don't have an exact timeline for ``correction`` of this perceived ``abuse`` of the system, but this sort of thing was common in the world then. English bought and sold ranks in the Army; they were listed in the newspaper ``For sale!`` Getting a post could be a problem! ) But you automatically got half-pay for sitting around doing nothing! :The government supported the church. The often well-to-do major landowner of the surrounding area had influence on who was appointed (if you're American, think Polly Harrington in the book or film ``Pollyanna (1960 film)``). Duties varied since the population varied. There were probably ``livings`` where they reasonably shouldn't have placed a congregation, but to remove it would deprive rural Anglicans of churchgoing. Livings weren't necessarily permanent. The clergy could be replaced so the political situation had to be taken into account. Think of William Collins in Pride and Prejudice (1995 TV series). :Morals analysis changed. Perception of ``abuse`` changed as well. It wasn't considered ``crooked`` but just normal procedure at the time. :Having said that, this information should be somewhere, but probably not in this article. An Anglican church article? Kind of touches on it in Curate#Anglican_Communion. `

2,014

true

article

random

train

false

620,928,667

::::::You must have forgotten TAURUS! In my experience, developing rubbish can be very time-consuming.

2,014

true

user

random

train

false

620,934,969

` == File:Hooj 3drives.jpg listed for deletion == A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hooj 3drives.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. `

2,014

true

user

random

test

false