rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
622,557,494
|
` ::::: Yes, wait. On the theatrical release poster Live.Die.Repeat is in a bigger font than the actual title too. It is complete WP:OR to assume the title has now been changed. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,574,288
|
` ``User:Chris Stang From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia User account ``Chris Stang`` is not registered.`` SummerPhD, you don't have a problem with a user addressing me who, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chris_Stang says there is no such user. But, If I call you deceitful, that will be my ``last`` offense and I'll be banned while you have non-existent ``users`` appear out of nowhere and falsely accuse me of attacking that ``non-existent`` user. Care to explain this to me? `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,589,422
|
== SpaceX Falcon 9 test failiure. == Requesting input on failiure of a SpaceX Falcon 9 test failiure on 24/08/2014.
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,596,039
|
` ::OK, now I see, you refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret G. Hays. That discussion resulted in consensus to omit a separate article. But the discussion was sparsely attended, so I can reopen it if you can supply sources that show that Margaret G. Hays meets the requirements for an article described at WP:GNG or WP:BIO. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,624,125
|
== Requested move == :Widnes Vikings F.C. → – Club has dropped the Vikings name and become Widnes Football Club
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,653,307
|
` == Have a cupcake! since you have no friends or life award! == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;`` |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;`` | |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Wow you must live a very sad loney life. I guess if i had no friend or anyone that cared about me I would spend all my time pretending like a know it all with a stick in my butt as i ride my high horse. So here is a cupcake you fruitloop diggus! Go ban me and change another article to whatever you what it to say so you feel like you have some power in the world, cause god knows it must suck to be you. p.s. stop trying to pick up little boys on the internet im telling chris hanson! |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,660,154
|
Here is a copy of that message with full headers (personally identifiable information removed): []
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,662,158
|
peculiar, as though the blocking admin was committed to blocking me and was simply setting a series of artificial conditions hoping I would fail one so I could be blocked; then blocking me anyway even after the conditions were met
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,664,217
|
::Thank you for your kind offers, and . However, it seems that the email may not have been the real issue as I've now been blocked anyway. I apologize for disturbing you with what appears to be an interpersonal dispute. Best -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,664,333
|
after posting my 13:28 22AUG2014 message
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,664,975
|
would continue to be, delayed due to my IRL schedule.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,678,923
|
== You're missing all the fun ==
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,720,903
|
:Tennis. In some cases, they have huge articles for every season/year of a given player's entire career. I had never seen anything like it until on of the individual season articles came up at AfD. I am polling the various sports projects to see if any of them have anything similar. So far, no other sport has anything like it. Some of them can apparently satisfy the general notability guidelines, but that's not the standard they have been using.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,723,345
|
First of all, the user shouldn't have came to me on a verbal aggressive way and could of said it the alternate way, which he failed to do so, and I responded back at his comments and gave him a fair warning if he tries to f*** with me again. I'll bet he won't like it and back away from it. Anyways, regarding about the 2000 New Flyer C40HF buses (5000-5222) they were at divisions 3, 5, 7 and 18. Although, a few of them were at SGV-3 division, when they were brand new and entering into service in the early 2000s, before being sent to divisions SB-5 and WSC-7. If you haven't noticed, a few of their cousins C40LF buses were at the same division they were, since one 5300 series bus was on line 180 in the early 2000s, when it was brand new. So, it wasn't the C40HFs that were at D3, their cousins were, too. Yeah, SB-5 division did have a few of the New Flyer D40LF buses (3000-3019) at one time, before they were sent to WSC-6 for almost their whole life, before 3 or 4 units were sent to Veolia Transportation (a bus contractor) in 2009 or 2010. I remembered riding one of those D40LF buses on line 115, when SB-5 used to operate that line, shared by SB-18, which currently owns the line. Btw, thanks for sending me a message in a civilized matter. After all, me and you have had verbal altercations in the beginning over bus stuff and changes. But it's all cool now, right?
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,723,879
|
And your point of hindering me from editing anything on Wikipedia (due to a user who was being delinquent and a nuisance)? I believe you need to revise on the IR (incident report) he sent to you about me verbally attacking him. He came at me in a verbal aggressive way and tried to play the victim. btw, how does the word 'inferior' an offense? It's not a profane word. Profane words like 'b****, mother****er, f*** you, a**hole, c*******ing, bull****, d***, and so on are more offending words than what you told me about one word being unacceptable. Please, try to be more specific on what you're talking about, before you bewildered your thoughts.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
622,725,015
|
LMFAO, you gotta be f***ing kidding me, but I'll take your word for it. If you haven't checked the user's verbal attack words at me. You should check, he's probably feeling proud for what he did and getting away with it, behind your back and maybe erasing his comments to avoid being caught in the act. He sized me up, so I sized him back. I know it's wrong to call people by slurs, but it's what it is and needs to take his own medicine.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
622,726,648
|
` {|style=``border-top:solid thin lightgrey;background:transparent;padding:4px;`` | Response to third opinion request: |- |style=``padding-left:0.6cm``| Reading the above discussion, I'll have to agree that this redirect should target to Winston Churchill as writer. I would normally have declined this post for not having ``thorough discussion`` per instructions at the main 3O page. One side has not presented their views much but since this is a relatively minor dispute, which cannot have much discussion in the first place. It should target to Winston Churchill as writer rather than Winston Churchill for the simple reason that this is his pen name and is more contextually relevant to the former page while his 'main' page may just have a tiny section devoted to him as a writer. I would further recommend that someone better add in the lead section of Winston Churchill as writer about this in bold (something like ``He wrote under the pen name Winston S. Churchill'``. See WP:BOLDTITLE and further Wikipedia:Article titles#Treatment of alternative names, this helps readers understand why they are redirected from an alternative name to a relatively unfamiliar article. Sincerely, |}`
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
622,766,559
|
== Relief and Social Services == Added source reference and updated. Pared away following details, but kept the 6% figure in the text: Fewer than six percent of refugees qualify as hardship cases, with the largest number being in Lebanon where restrictions on Palestinians entering the Lebanese job market cause severe hardship. Rations are distributed to families in UNRWA's special hardship category every quarter. Finances permitting, the Agency also provides small cash grants to very poor refugee families to help with the purchase of items such as school uniforms and school books or as crisis grants, for example if they lose all their possessions in a house fire. Most of the concrete-block shelters in the refugee camps were built by UNRWA in the 1950s to replace the tents in which refugees had lived since the 1948 war. Others were built after the 1967 conflict. Although most refugees have been able to make improvements and additions to their shelters over the years, the very poorest refugees often live in shelters that are now in extremely bad condition. Wet, crumbling walls, leaking zinc roofs and rodent infestation cause additional social and health problems. UNRWA has been able to repair hundreds of shelters in recent years, often simply by supplying materials while the families provide their own labour. UNRWA is unable to keep up with the growing numbers of special hardship case families who each year join its waiting list for shelter rehabilitation.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
622,774,858
|
* Thomas, normally the Wikipedia format is not to red-link people who are not yet (or have been deleted - a Wikipedia problem) incorporated into an article. You would simply mention their name (however it is you want to include them) and someone (or yourself) would make the links live as they built articles about them. ==What Happened to the Original Article?== I guess the most essential question is what happened to the original article that was on Wikipedia regarding this firm? Where has all of that research and effort gone and who was responsible for its removal? It almost defeats the purpose of even having a Wikipedia doesn't it?
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,775,280
|
, i.e. the format of the names you are using and how their names are used in public formats
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,790,512
|
` Why did you delete some of my citations on my new article ``taxation in Latvia``... Not that it matter I added some new ones I think are better... Just pure interest P `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
622,790,634
|
:: if you need to improve the text, remember it's for the edit mode, if you're in edit you'd have to expect a little difficulty in the reading. Paring a ref back to near dead link is counter productive. ::As with your Tim, note the first ref where I named it and duped the second ref of the ref. I ve also seen where you can put the named refs under the reflist and only use the named ref in the text. Had a first paragraph with lots of refs, moved them all down to the bottom, the end result text reads the same in the article space and the edit space is much cleaner.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
622,803,112
|
Typical, lets concentrate on I'm the problem. Not that Wiki, and monitors got it wrong. Note the different spellings of the village.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,805,037
|
` Welcome to the crazy world of Cyrillic. Reference to your claim about different spelling. Tundja or Tundzha, etc, etc. Municipality website spells the village name as source Wiki. Perhaps their jest on a nation whom refuses to check, check and check again. The first link is a correct spelling for the village, present the spelling is with ``zh`` and the new Cyrillic sign posts are shortened as metal theft was a problem, that's removed now that a population no access to scrap yards. On street view, attain lots of vines, many kms of vines a fact. One could from that perhaps then conclude a winery existence? This is the case. The Novinite article is factual, that winery was modernized. Your claim of ``That first link is to a different village of similar spelling which is in the same city,`` Display these similar named villages. Again are using your power, I think this is abuse? Back-up your statement, please.`
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,805,454
|
. Probable Hadji Dimovo. Location unknown. No time to check.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,806,235
|
Hadji Dimitrovo, Stara Zagora. Ask what region this village be located? Not Yambol. Hadji Dimitrovo, Veliko Tarnovo Ditto Hadji Dimitrovo, Yambol. Correct village. Old spelling. See earlier post to confirm. Hadjidimovo
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,806,546
|
While all you foreigners decide what to call a Bulgarian village. I'm going to sleep. Perhaps the collective whom ban folk whom want to contribute could wake up and understand that what you did and one other call abuse of power... Remove all your crap posts and get a life. Choa.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
622,810,436
|
==WWE Network== A wrestling site is not a good source
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,818,045
|
::Sounds vaguely familiar :::The Bishop: I will not buy this record, it is scratched. :::Sinister Buttocks: My hovercraft is full of eels. ::
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,827,299
|
` * See previous comment; I don't like repeating myself in sections that re-raise the same issues. Much of this dispute could be avoided by putting reviews and other critical commentary, pro and con, in a section specifically for that. It's normal, routine practice here. This entire fight is about POV issues arising because different parties are trying to misuse external opinions as if they were facts, and they're both wrong to do so. — ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
622,856,208
|
WIKI bullies at it again. They invade peoples posts, muck up their content, place links that are without source data.
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,876,462
|
REDIRECT Talk:Bhuvanaikabahu VII of Kotte
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
622,882,275
|
I have a larger bibliography and more information about the Orientalizing period of this site. I do work at the site and realize this could be a conflict of interest. If someone wants this information to update it let me know, otherwise I will update it
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,882,558
|
The only problem is the etymology section of Thor doesn't need to be illustrated with a picture of lightning to tell our readership that lightning causes thunder even if they did not know that much, it tells us NOTHING about the etymology of Thor, and it tells us nothing about Thor period. They need to go to another page to learn about lightning, and here it is off topic, or just looks like Fan art creeping in where it doesn't belong. //
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,909,234
|
` ::Another plausible scenario, if we were to believe Wilson and his assertion that Brown knocked the shit out of him, is that his vision could have been affected by the blow to the side of his face, which would account for his ``poor marksmanship`` and ``wide of the mark`` shots. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,919,034
|
I don't think anyone has ever done an outcomes-based trial of the effects of a completely vegetable free diet either, but somehow we all seem to be pretty convinced that its a bad idea.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
622,919,360
|
` August 2014 (UTC) Alright, thanks again. Well, I thought this time it could also be the ``English Patriot Man``, as the person hiding behind this IP address edited exclusively the data involving Poland, deleted everything, and even dared to edit the original title of the source. 18:37, 26`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,956,475
|
PUT THIS PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests. The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms, and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms. PUT IT BACK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software. https://github.com/evandrix/Splat/tree/master/code/demo/pyprimes-0.1.1a/pyprimes-tests https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2011-December/087209.html So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS drprinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,956,917
|
You and everyone deleting the 8 Prime Spirals are all LIARS the original article was CITED it cited peer level speed tests of all the top prime algorithms. Yet you twits claim not verified. BS. I VERIFIED MY CLAIMS. This is why the world of Academia considers wiki to be run by clueless power hungry twit mods that know nothing about academia. READ THE CITES IN THE ARTICLE YOU TWITS DELETED I shouldn't even be wasting my breath on such nazi censoring worms. PUT THE PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests. The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms, and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms. PUT IT BACK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software. https://github.com/evandrix/Splat/tree/master/code/demo/pyprimes-0.1.1a/pyprimes-tests https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2011-December/087209.html So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS drprinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,957,130
|
` == ``I think this is important`` is not a valid argument == Your response to multiple editors' tagging your pages for deletion has been ``the work of Dr. Adoni is now superior`` with elaboration. That doesn't work on Wikipedia. It's not enough for you to argue, however strenuously, that this work is really important. You instead must cite reliable, independent sources (what are those? see WP:V) to support the claims. You and everyone deleting the 8 Prime Spirals are all LIARS the original article was CITED it cited peer level speed tests of all the top prime algorithms. Yet you twits claim not verified. BS. I VERIFIED MY CLAIMS. This is why the world of Academia considers wiki to be run by clueless power hungry twit mods that know nothing about academia. READ THE CITES IN THE ARTICLE YOU TWITS DELETED I shouldn't even be wasting my breath on such nazi censoring worms. PUT THE PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests. The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms, and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms. PUT IT BACK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software. https://github.com/evandrix/Splat/tree/master/code/demo/pyprimes-0.1.1a/pyprimes-tests https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2011-December/087209.html So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS drprinceton`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
622,957,265
|
A bunch of non-academic clowns are now censoring the info, so I'm wasting my breath talking to morons. IMO You and everyone deleting the 8 Prime Spirals are all LIARS the original article was CITED it cited peer level speed tests of all the top prime algorithms. Yet you twits claim not verified. BS. I VERIFIED MY CLAIMS. This is why the world of Academia considers wiki to be run by clueless power hungry twit mods that know nothing about academia. READ THE CITES IN THE ARTICLE YOU TWITS DELETED I shouldn't even be wasting my breath on such nazi censoring worms. PUT THE PAGE BACK it was citd to GITHUB speed tests. The new Prime Spirals beat all the other prime algorithms, and wiki has pages for the slower prime algorithms. PUT IT BACK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals GITHUB is where the tests were done and not one real mathematician or computer programming expert question the results since anyone can duplicate them from the open source software. https://github.com/evandrix/Splat/tree/master/code/demo/pyprimes-0.1.1a/pyprimes-tests https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2011-December/087209.html So the original article CITED major outside sources to PROVE THE CLAIMS drprinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
622,962,716
|
Honestly the way wiki is treating this is a JOKE a. I could have cited NEWS SITES but since when is a news site worthy of an academic cite? b. if the person that wanted PEER REVIEW felt like it, he would have sought it 20 years ago, HE CHOSE NOT TO DO IT, but none the less his work is known and was mentioned in many math related 'forums' and most ignored it. c. Only the recent 2012 open source test of the work PROVED the 30Mod algorithm is a major thing in math, again, GITHUB is a programmers resource and it was not until a computer used the actual 30Mod algorithm that it was shown to be a 'big thing' and since then some news sites have covered it, but I chose not to cite them due to IMO they are not NPOV. But none the less they covered the story. d. The FACT is a major computer site where programmers have free reign to challenge any claims exists and for over two years not one programmer challenged the findings. e. so what if the person that discovered it works outside of academia and has no regard for normal 'peer review' the fact is he has no peers if you ask some in academia that know of his work, and I am one of those people that know of the work and how brilliant the work is. Now to summarize, we have a bunch of pags about primes on wiki, and even pages created after his discovery that USE his discovery (ie. the sieve of Atkin 60Mod work is his work discussed in the public forum and usenet math and physics forums is where he chose to discuss his amazing work. So now you have 2004 sieve of Atkin using a 60Mod algorithm, guess what that was in his 1995 paper. So does wiki acknowledge that? No. And i didn't even bother to waste my time of the 60 mod algorithm since the big deal as you are saying is the PyPrimes test and I cited that very well, it's a program created in Python, I cited the wiki python page, then I cited Github for both PyPrimes and the PyPrimes testing. Now while MATH is m forte, I am sufficient enough in computer skills to understand what Github is and to understand how to read the speed tests and the prime spirals smoked every algorithm there is. Now anyone can download python (which I have done) and download pyprimes (which I have done) and run the tests. Guess what just like a math experiment, it is duplicated. So GITHUB and the tests which are not 'new' should be enough to begin a wiki page on this truly amazing discovery in math. I myself became aware of the first paper in 1995, as did others in aademia. Recently I became aware of 'news sites' running stories citing what I copied, the links to the Github tests. While some here can say well it's not AMA, so what, in the world of primality testing primes spirals as per the PyPrimes results shows PRIME SPIRALS are a big deal. Now I tried to be NPOV in giving all sides of the story, Adoni has a valid 1995 claim I can verify it and I chose not to. But I cited a Drexel Math forum and I could have cited many other math sites discussing his 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime work in the 1990's. Is this signficant? You bet it is since 60Mod prime sieve aka Atkin sieve is 20004 so his 60mod prime work is well before it. Now the Github tests mentions 'croft spirals', that's due to in 2010 a person named croft registering a web site and ripping off the 1995 work. MY OPINION. Now Croft can say all he wants that he found it playng his guitar or whatever he is claiming. The fact is anyone can document Adoni with Prime theory from the 1990's saying 30mod, 60mod and 90mod is the key. 9 Years later sieve of atkin appears, well that's only a rehash of the adoni 60mod work from the 1990's. Yet no one is giving him credit. 2010 croft puts out his 30Mod work and its inserted into PyPrimes on Github and it smokes every major prime algorithm there is and all of them have pages on wiki as I cited. So 2012 a work on Github verifies how important to primality the 30mod spirals are, but he says croft spirals, well guess what HelixQ is now out there and taking 100% credit for the 1995 work of Dr. Adoni. My site to a Drexel math site from the 1990's mentioning 30Mod prime work (prime spirals) is a major cite, since Adoni could care less about the AMA or whatever, in all probability he will soon be nominated for a Nobel on his work, that is how important it is. Think about it, not one prime algorithm could beat the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes, none of them. On a computer creating primes all other algorithms are terribly slow. The only two fast generators from scratch are the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes and the PRIME SPIRALS, and the winner was Prime Spirals. Now I can cite recent news articles about it, laughing at academics it links to that said it was no big deal in the 1990's who now all look foolish due to the PyPrimes tests. SO PUT BACK THE ARTICLE and let the debate begin, others will agree with me, the PyPrimes tests are a legitimate academic cite. Now the issue is only what do we call the 8 Prime Spirals, I called the page 8 PRIME SPIRALS aka Adoni Spirals, since Adoni is the person that in the 1990's who was saying here is the 30mod algorithm (8 prime spirals) the 60mod and 90mod prime algorithms. Such a Draconian response of mods is a joke, it's why no one in Academia cites wiki. NO ONE DOES. Yet I chose to put up a wiki page since I'm familiar with the whole story for almost 20 years and the PyPrimes results are a 'big deal'. Dr. Adoni will win a Nobel prize over it, it's that BIG in math to out perform the sieve of Eratosthenes as validated in the PyPrimes program. drprinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,962,887
|
boo hoo LOL reading LIES by mods resulted in my stating my OPINION on those mods. THEY LIE I cited the articles CASE CLOSED drprinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,963,341
|
DrPrinceton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_prime_spirals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helixq https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_sol_adoni My opinion on these pages is uneducated mods deleted them for invalid reasons with NO DEBATE, a pure Draconian nazi mod behavior. The 8 Prime Spirals article is a BIG DEAL in math since it puts forth amazing information about a 1995 math theory now being used in real life computer programs to outperform all the prime algorithms wiki has pages on. So in the world of primality IT IS A BIG DEAL. To summarize the gross lies of wiki mods, they think a cite to a valid primality test open to debate by real academics at GITHUB is not worthy of a page creation. LOL So now let the mods enjoy their worthless realm of unimportance which wiki is to most in academia. DR PRINCETON DrPrinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,963,704
|
== August 2014 warning== Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia articles, as you did with this edit to the United States men's national soccer team page. If you continue to vandalize pages, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
622,965,679
|
` ==RE: MPT== Hi it has come to my attention that it is only the english articles that uses ``MRT`` instead of ``MPT`` which is used in the rest of other language wiki articles especially the Macedonian one. Debunking your romanized alphabet argument, it could be seen how even the logo has put ``MPT`` in a romanized alphabet form therefore should be the one to be followed. It is practice here in wikipedia to use the official naming used by the one being described in the article no matter what their translation to english might be such as Volkswagen which in direct romanized translation is ``Folkswagen`` but the former prevailed due to it being the one used in the official logo of the company albeit being romanized too. I understand your argument on the main article ``Macedonian Radio Television`` that is why I kept that because its original name would not make sense in an expanded form here in english wiki. But its acronym should not be meddled upon especially it has a logo to prove it and the main article could provide the knowledge why MPT and what is its translation to english.Lastly the MRT 1 and MRT 2 pages should be really up for a disambiguation as the MRT worldwide may refer to Mass Rapid Transit or an equivalent rail term. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
622,966,430
|
` ==MPT== Hi it has come to my attention that it is only the english articles that uses ``MRT`` instead of ``MPT`` which is used in the rest of other language wiki articles especially the Macedonian one. Debunking the romanized alphabet argument, it could be seen how even the logo has put ``MPT`` in a romanized alphabet form therefore should be the one to be followed. It is practice here in wikipedia to use the official naming used by the one being described in the article no matter what their translation to english might be such as Volkswagen which in direct romanized translation is ``Folkswagen`` but the former prevailed due to it being the one used in the official logo of the company albeit being romanized too. I understand your argument on the main article ``Macedonian Radio Television`` that is why I kept that because its original name would not make sense in an expanded form here in english wiki. But its acronym should not be meddled upon especially it has a logo to prove it and the main article could provide the knowledge why MPT and what is its translation to english.Lastly the MRT 1 and MRT 2 pages should be really up for a disambiguation as the MRT worldwide may refer to Mass Rapid Transit or an equivalent rail term. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,973,540
|
:Also https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Bbjalvin
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
622,976,214
|
` As WP:CONSENSUS says, In determining consensus, consider the quality of the arguments, the history of how they came about, the objections of those who disagree, and existing policies and guidelines. The quality of an argument is more important than whether it represents a minority or a majority view. The arguments ``I just don't like it`` and ``I just like it`` usually carry no weight whatsoever. I'd really appreciate it if you'd join the discussion I'm having with BGwhite, above, about specific formatting issues. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
622,976,605
|
Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,999,304
|
.Jimmy Wales and Professor John Naughton have already been made aware of this
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
622,999,991
|
` == 'WIKIPEDIA' ``This place is a lunatic asylum!`` * (*Quote from the Flash Gordon film) == For Editors were they 'mad' to begin with or driven 'mad' by ``Wikipedia`` editing? That is the question! `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,010,001
|
` == Tabloid source still does not support claim of nickname... == Since they come right out and say (at the bottom of the article): ``We have since learnt 'The Bear' isn't actually his nickname but can be considered an insult in Turkey... Erm, sorry about that Turkey.`` So, in the future be sure and remember that sensational newspapers such as the Mirror are considered tabloids and are not to be used to source facts...and you need to read the entire story to be sure the title actually contains content that supports the headline which this did not. Even without the added disclaimer the article simply did not support the claim. The editor who reverted you has kindly removed their ANI report, but you could well be guilty of violating edit warring anyway for adding back contentious material about a living person that you were warned was a violation. For this reason I am contacting an administrator to request the take a look to be sure there were no actual violations needing intervention. Thanks. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,020,147
|
`WOW! No one else is permitted an opinion?... and that ``... criminalizing (note: not ``criminalising``)... comment takes the biscuit, or does bastardised English trump original English in Wikiland? :::`
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,030,913
|
` == Terms of use texts == These types of things don't belong in Wikipedia, as they are not encyclopedia articles. ... `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
623,049,648
|
:There was a section in the article addressing this subject but it was removed by user with this edit.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,053,871
|
` ::: If you really think it's likely, speedy close it per WP:SNOW. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,056,560
|
DrPrinceton GITHUB is the top place where new computer projects are created and discussed by computer programmers. Anything that isn't right gets corrected pretty fast. For over two years the PyPrimes speed test which is open source has had not one person question the results and since it is open source anyone can download the core of Python a major new computer language and run PyPrimes and test all the various prime algorithms. Every algorithm lost to the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes, every one but Prime Spirals. Now, outside of that real world test, the average mathematician or computer programmer is pretty much clueless as to primes and how they really interact in the modern world today (ie. Cryptology). Now I could have used a ton of links to NPOV and alternative sites where for 20 years you have various groups arguing what this new algorithm means for the world. In fact much of the original argument was erased from Usenet in the 1990's, and the only group that could have done that was the NSA. Since the original algorithm was released when the NSA still controlled encryption related publishing (original paper was 1995) NO PUBLISHING COMPANY would have touched anything claiming to be how this algorithm made all encryption OBSOLETE, that was the original paper, saying to the world in 1995, here world, here is where every prime number above 5 MUST BE, there are only 8 Prime Spirals, now your whole concept of encryption has been DESTROYED by this work. So, this prime algorthm was tied to national security issues in 1995, and in 1995 the NSA had a headlock on all academic publishing and guess what they still do today, who funds the AMS and the top journals? THE NSA Now my original article didn't go this deep into why in 1995, this work could not be published in academia due to the NSA chokehold on academic publishing for anything that could possibly be used to create new encryption or damage old encryption. Now 99.99% of the world is clueless that PRIMES are a big deal in crypto. A HUGE DEAL So understanding where they all exist and on what spirals they exist, you can now do neat tricks, like create huge seed keys for ECC crypto that gives the person that creates such a seed key a backdoor to that crypto, oh no, now we're talking about the heart of the issue WIKI LEAKS is all about crypto and how the NSA has a special skeleton key to the seed keys released by NSA projects like NIST and ENISA (europes equivalent). Now in 1995 to 1999 or so this was discussed in many thousands of pages all over usenet, try to find them now, most are gone, now I actually participated in that era in some usenet discussions about the ENNISA paper, you cannot find one thread now mentioning ENNISA from the 1990's. So erased all the discussion in math and physics groups about ENNISA? Yet, if you really know where to look, you can find some references to the work, not ENNISA but the person's name and some of the the actual math still exists. Now, the math is in books, who published the books, the guy that released it has his own publishing company and it was done via ebooks. So I have a copy of the ebook. I know it's real. Now today you have academics taking credit for bits and pieces of his work, and they are 100% controlled sock puppets of the NSA. So the NSA is now controlling what the public learns about this discovery 20 years after the fact it was released via usenet. One of the new algorithms is the Atkin sieve, look who published it with Atkin, the guy that sued the US Government in the 1990's to allow software to be published without interference of the NSA. Look at the guys wiki page, he was tutored by the guy that actually created ECC, the stuff the NSA is using to backdoor all encryption today. So 1995, the guy is suing the US Gov and 10 years later he is at AMS as the co-author of one of the 3 prime algorithms discussed in ENNISA in 1995. Just google NSA and AMS, see all the NSA funding. Just like when academics rebelled in the 1980's against the stranglehold the NSA had on crypto, guess what the NSA did, they bought out all of academia with grants. Now I'm not a tin foil hat guy/girl, I'm retired, I was in academia and I can actually discuss stuff about math and how academia works and how various topics were taboo in the 1970's through the 1990's. So AMS MAA AMA, etc, all are now in bed with grants and funding from the NSA. You look at sieve of Atkin and who is on the paper the kid that sued the government over crypto software in the 1990's, who was groomed by the daddy of ECC now the top crypto used by NSA and all the crypto gang, and now you have wiki leaks exposing how corrupt and back doored ECC is. So 1995, no one would publish anything about algorithms that could destroy modern crypto as the ENNISA paper claimed it could do. Usenet was the way you discussed stuff in 1990's. I've had access to the net and such things since the 1970's when it was created as a defense project by having the top think tanks use it. So back to the article, while none of the real 'conspiracy' related issues with why this algorithm was released in 1995 as it was via usenet and then via a controlled publishing company the guy that released the algorithm controlled, that was the only way you could bring to light this amazing new algorithm that very few people understand. However, the GITHUB project allowed even laymans now to understand how important the 30Mod algorithm is to primes and therefore to crypto The world of academic publishing is controlled by NSA and they control REDDIT and they created Bitcoin (it uses ECC and Satoshi Nakamoto is Japanese for Central Intelligence that's how brazen they are). ECC created by Lenstra. Lenstra groomed the kid that sued the NSA who is now in bed with them. That kid is co-author of the 60Mod sieve of Atkin, and 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime algorithms were all released in 1995 by DR ADONI, who owned his own publishing company so he could publish what he wanted, and the info was put into usenet under ENNISA and guess what it is now erased. It was also put into a case from 1995 in which Dr. Adoni sued the US Government for harassing him over ENNISA. Go post stuff about Dr Adoni and the NSA and his algorithm on REDDIT and see how fast it gets deleted, just like here, so NSA bots? Or mods? haha The original paper discussed how the 8 prime spirals would make all modern encryption obsolete, now 20 years later wiki leaks has the info the NSA cooked all the seed keys with special knowledge of the numbers they released through NIST and ENISA. So to summarize, in 1995 no academic paper would publish a work that stated WARNING THIS FORMULA DESTROYS MODERN CRYPTO Now you have the 30Mod parading under Croft Spirals inside PyPrimes, guess what Croft didn't create the 30Mod prime formula Adoni did. Then you had the Adoni 60Mod prime work released by the guy that sued the NSA who got his doctorate under LENSTRA the guy that created ECC the NSA crypto now used. You search around google you see how the NSA is behind all the top academic journals now. Wiki deleting an article on the 8 Prime Spirals with the speed test cite to GITHUB that no one challenged and anyone can duplicate with the open source software is the start of alerting the public to how the NSA now controls all ECC crypto. And wiki was used by the NSA to create a bs smoke screen over the sieve of Atkin, which is really pretty irrelevant to the real 30Mod formula aka 8 PRIME SPIRALS So now that you all can UNDERSTAND how academia really works and how the NSA has a stranglehold on it, you can understand why wiki was chosen as one of the paths to reveal what is happening. 30Mod is the big deal, it was released to Usenet in 1995 and it is now 99% erased, since it explains how the formula can be used to create CORRUPT SEED KEYS in crypto. Wiki leaks now explains the NSA has corrupt seed keys, and they used ENNISA to do it. 2004 the kid that sued the NSA releases sieve of Atkin a slow algorithm which was only discussed in ENNISA as being an insignficant twin sieve to 30Mod, 2x30mod is 60mod and the algorithm in 60mod is completely duplicated, but it's slow since you are double checking work, 30Mod is the speed demon in primality as pyprimes verified. Then you have the real secret part the 90mod loop or prime trigger, 3x(30n+p) is the trigger to create a vibration in primes unique from 1x(30n+p) and 2x(30n+p) That prime sequence is where the NSA is cooking ECC. Now any mods that deleted this topic, did you realize that in the 1990's you could not publish anything about crypto without the NSA stamp of approval? Do you find it suspicious that the guy that sued the NSA in the 1990's suddenly has his name on a part of a 1995 paper claiming it as his own work when everyone in academia that got the 1995 paper (a lot got it) knows the 60Mod sieve of atkin was in the ENNISA paper in 1995. Then you realize that kid on the paper of atkin was groomed by Lenstra the daddy of ECC and you start to look at wiki leaks and ECC and you see, ECC is cooked. Now most will say TIN HAT STUFF, its not, it's real and wiki leaks proves my claims. So WIKI was used by Sieve of Atkin crowd to disinfo primality resea
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,077,323
|
::::Why are you trying to expurgate the ethnicity and religious affiliation of the perpetrators from the article? Why did you ask for the mosque removed from the map at the FAC discussion? I offer that your agenda is to play down the fact that this was racist crime, which it clearly was.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,097,887
|
drprinceton The way wiki immediately took down the 8 prime spirals pages and the minor referer pages about the person that discovered it way back in 1995 who also has a new project known as HelixQ is a joke. Let's see the argument of wiki is that the 8 Prime Spirals are not 'peer reviewed', in academia anything involving crypto and national security has been censored for decades and in 1995 when the original paper came out revealing numerous new prime theory that was years ahead of prime theory then, there was no way for such work to even be published, so USENET was how it was distributed, and it's a fact usenet has been heavily edited involving the topic. Now you can all point to your rules about 'peer review' but this shows how ignorant everyone thus far is about academia and censoring of math involving primes and crypto. Let's see wiki has a page on Dr. Bernstein, a guy that took the NSA to court in 1995 the same year the paper was released, so that's how restricted publishing prime theory as it relates to crypto was in 1995, and is still today. You expect NSA funded journals like AMS to allow such information to be 'peer reviewed'? Anyway, my original article was 'heavy handed' killed by 'mods' at wiki and if you don't think the NSA has infiltrated wiki and almost every type of mass social media on the net (and yes to me wiki is a social media/project) then you need to read on the Snowden documents. So the article put a light on some very interesting 'prime theory' that is supported by GitHub, anyone can check the github cite to see the info that every so-called prime algorithm and many have pages on wiki, all failed to outperform a 2300 year old algorithm, aka sieve of Eratosthenes, all expect for one algorithm, a prime spiral algorithm that I KNOW has been around since 1995 and a theory that has been heavily censored by the NSA since almost any reference to the many posts about ENNISA Prime Formula has been erased from Usenet, the original 'social media' of the net. That all being said, I'm constantly now being 'threatened' by who? Mods that think me insisting the removal of the original page is suspect to obvious manipulation most likely by the NSA? Prove wiki has no NSA bots or mods controlling the discussion, put the page up and let it be edited properly. The original article was what I would think any real mod not working for the NSA would agree was pretty NPOV, and the 'cite' to github verified the whole claims, that a new prime algorithm is beating all known prime algorithms, something the other wiki page prime algorithms do not do. The original article referenced the discover is connected to obvious 'disinfomation' as well, and the continued supression of anyone discussing his work and him as was done by wiki in this article is defacto proof that the PTB want to keep the public and academia in the dark about significant advancements in prime theory. Anyone can google NSA and the major journals you think are 'peer reviewed', what do you see searching NSA and AMS, oh it's funded by the NSA. LOL That's your 'peer review', so any real mod here can step in and put the original article back. The PyPrimes test of the algorithm shows how major this work is. Then the public can decide who discovered it, I know the origin is 1995 and 1997, I've been following it that long, and to see wiki put up pages about a slow 60Mod algorithm from 2004 that was discussed in the same prime work in 1995 is a joke. Then you start to peel away who are the guys involved in all this new crypto and prime work and you start to see nothing but NSA funded projects. What you don't think the NSA had laws in place for decades banning such work? They did. And now they control the academic journals with funding to furthr control what is released about anything that can impact crypto and the heart of crypto is what, PRIME NUMBER THEORY. The mere fact that a project that is open to PUBLIC SCRUTINY by competent computer programmers has shown for over two years a new prime algorithm is the so-called king of the hill of prime theory, and wiki mods and most likely NSA/wiki mods are doing their best to treat the PyPrimes speed tests like they are insignificant. The fact is PyPrimes exposed how advanced the 1995 work of Dr. Adoni was by it beating all the major prime algorithms. The fact is PyPrimes referred to the 1995 30Mod Prime algorithm as 'Croft Spirals', which is a joke since Croft created his site about the theory in 2010, then in 2012 PyPrimes picked it up, and now wiki is saying so what, there's a new prime algorithm that dethroned every prime algorithm wiki has pages on. I personally think I did a great job of being NPOV and then to see mods come along and OUTRIGHT LIE it was not cited is more disinfo, then to see mods saying no peer review, yeah sure, NSA controlled math journals are going to print what they want buried, a real new prime algorithm that can out do any known algorithm and also do what the Snowden documents says the NSA has done, that being cooking ECC seed keys issued by NIST and ENISA. The needs to be a wiki page on this, it's a 'big deal' if you understand math and primes that the PyPrimes tests have verified a major advance in primality was made. I could have cited many so-called 'news sites' in the article but I know they are not NPOV sites, so why bother. PyPrimes test is a legitimate cite and by having the prime spirals 'out in the open' so they appear for prime related searches by anyone in the world as the page will eventually do, will expose to the world, did you know a major new prime algorithm exists and test it yourself, download python, download pyprimes, run the tests yourself, and when anyone does, they all ask, WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THIS. Oh, I tried to discuss it on wiki and what happened? ARTICLE DELETED in minutes. LOL Now I'm being threatened with a permanent ban for questioning mods that are either working for the NSA or really just bad mods that have no clue about why NSA controlled academica journals will never discuss a prime algorithm that the NSA uses to cook ECC seed keys. Now if you don't think the NSA has cooked all the ECC crypto, read wiki leaks, it was done, how was it done? They got the ENNISA Prime algorithm in 1995 when they seized the computers of Dr. Adoni, do you want me to cite SIX US SUPREME COURT CASE FILES over his false imprisonment in US jails over bogus cases? They exist. So while many who refuse to do THE RESEARCH to verify these claims will say tin hat loon, it's real, very real, just like the PyPrimes primality tests is very real and repeatable so anyone can redo the work and see a major advance in primes was made and it's 30mod prime spirals and the discovery happened in 1995. Why would wiki have a page on SoA, sieve of Atkin from 2004? 60Mod prime algorithm is based on 30Mod, 2x30Mod gets you 60mod, incase you can't do basic math. Oh, the paper on it came out AMS, the co-author is tied to the creator of ECC the crypto now cooked by the NSA. haha Again, none of these claims of conspiracy were in the original article, but I'm sure discussing them now. PUT THE ARTICLE BACK let it be properly edited and cited it is controversial and then see how the article stands. DrPrinceton
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,107,838
|
:::::If that were the case we would need to discuss next steps, but fortunately it doesn't appear we're there yet. Timothy says he plans to continue with improvements, so let's see how that progresses.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
623,126,910
|
== Note to self about source == http://www.lopers.com/sports/2009/9/23/FB_All_Time_History.aspx?path=football
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,136,338
|
===Moving on=== *ChrisGualtieri points out that it was I who created . And guess what? Within a few months the following was added to MOS:DASH: ::Also, it is recommended to use templates that provide formatting improvements over plain versions of dashes, such as ... , which inserts an em dash while allowing a line break after it. :The lesson? That at least one of the formatting innovations you tsk-tsk here is now a standard option for Wikipedia at large. Who knows? Maybe some of the others will end up in MOS too, if they're not strangled in the cradle in the name of anodyne uniformity. *There being no opinion expressed on the question (in the Discussion section, above) I'm gone ahead and deleted the two types of comments mentioned there (unused quote material, START/END markers) since I gather editors find them to have low signal-to-noise ratio. *However, I've restored many of the deleted notes, which were typically things like: :: :: :: :: :These are exactly the sort of the material that belongs in hidden notes. *I've added cites to the material tagged cite-needed. *Per the guideline BGwhite pointed to, I've deleted templates from cite templates
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,158,180
|
::: Sorry for not replying here sooner. I was scandalously prevented from editing by an admin who ought to have known better who took a user's barefaced lies at face value after that user lied and then personally attacked me without reason. Anyway, no, you can't redirect an article off its main obvious target. It's just not happening.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,158,530
|
:::: Thanks - thanks to your efforst I've been lbocked from editnig for the past 4 days. Bet you feel proud of yourself. :::: However, no, piling lies on top of further lies won't help your cause. You are clearly quite delusional, a calculating liar and should not be allowed to edit Wikipedia. :::: A leader of a council is more important than a non-leader. This is an indisuptable fact that you choose to ignore mostly because you're a complete idiot.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
623,158,683
|
== Rights removal request == Hi Mr Panda, Given your shocking treatment of people, will you now resign from being Wikipedia admin? Thanks.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,168,857
|
== New section on the ancient importation of this tree to Africa and South Asia == Although it is fairly well known that the Pipal tree was taken from places inside of India and transported to places like Sri Lanka, there are at least a handful of 19th century authors that describe this tree as being found and revered as sacred in parts of ancient Africa that have housed Buddhist missionaries. A modern author tries to cover the topic more fully in the book; The Inherent Scholarly Prejudices on the Relationship between Judaism, Buddhism, and Christianity-or-Jesus's Godama Sources and a Truer History of the Post-Axial Age Egyptian, Grecian, and Persian Empires
| 2,014
| false
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,169,066
|
Stop reverting my edits and there will be no issues or be reported your choice (:
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,183,250
|
==Academic centers== As mentioned above, acupuncture is used at a number of academic centers. This certainly belongs in the article; for starters, I've added it its own subsection under Acupuncture#International_reception . It's used at a great many such places, and at some point we might have so many that it may be a good idea to create a list. I know acupuncture is a fringe topic, and I would like to apologize in advance for pushing mainstream POV into it. -) • )
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,183,613
|
Additional odd comments Mr Babloo Loitongbam who is quoted self-referentially as a good egg was outed in a 2014 Indian Intelligence Bureau report as a paid agent of foreign governments who uses his fake NGOs to organize fake human rights campaigns to favour one multinational over another for oil and mineral extraction rights. One of his fronts JPF in 2013 announced they would be breaking all links with Sharmila in lieu of providing audited accounts of how they had been spending Sharmila's prize funds and also accused of using the tax free status to money launder for Mr Loitongbam. No one reading finds new information however as Mr Loitongbam is a sad self-publicist I am sure he appreciates the cover up wiki editors are doing for him. if he isn't paying you then you are stupid as well as uninformed. Desmond Coutinho still not idea what you mean by this is unsigned. The other errors and misinformation are minor.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,199,370
|
*Do not remove reports about yourself from ANI or you will be blocked.v/r -
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
test
| false
|
623,203,258
|
::Don't know how to send pics of the discs but just wanted to know if it was policy. Thanks.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
623,204,163
|
Referring to caption at right]] Dammit, I'm going out. I hate for my tickets to go to waste. Know anyone who can use them? To answer (Ritchie) your question re GA (not FA) delisting, see which incidentally makes some other blushworthy comments. :But seriously, I'd be very happy for you to comment on who's right and who's wrong. You too, ME123, and TRM.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,206,271
|
== Thanks for your comment at my Talk == ... but this is a deadly serious matter, and you know how far off the rails ANI can go. So if you want to comment, I'd appreciate your reading and make up your own mind.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,206,344
|
commenting there. A topic ban is a serious matter
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,218,990
|
` : Agree w/Flyer here, the sourcing was a primary study and a thesis, generally very weak sources, and the resulting image placed far too much undue weight on the findings. `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,221,116
|
` ::What ``template markup in an invisible comment``? Please find what you're talking about in the current version (permalink) and say what section it's in, and give you a search string, or quote some text, so the rest of us can tell what you're talking about. Just so you know, I have to go out again tonight and don't know when I'm back, and tomorrow I'll be at the dentist (yikes!) from the early morning for an unknown amount of time. `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,223,858
|
P.S. Oh wait tmw's Friday and I'll be traveling for the wkend.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,254,730
|
` == Lead word order == Coming to this page I noticed that the lead had the page title after the 'alternative' term ``car park``: :A car park (:American English: parking lot), This was done in an edit in Nov. 2013 by an IP in UK. Summary said ``Changed the order as every English speaking country but the USA uses ``car park`` ``, so non NPOV too. It looked really odd, and I presume non WP:MOS, thus I reverted so the 'US' English name (and page title) is first and the alternative 'British' English term next. :A parking lot (:British English: car park), Surprising this wasn't noticed after 9 months! `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,261,980
|
` == Hey, Mr. Troll == Why don't you learn what the word ``vandalism`` means? Better yet, why don't you resign as a sysop since you don't have a bloody clue what you're doing, Mr. 62K Edits. Big f*cking deal. I am so impressed. Learn your job, or leave it to someone who does. Why don't you try fixing those problems, rather than blocking me. The admins at WP are a bunch of incompetents on a power trip. `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,262,012
|
:If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. :
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
623,262,107
|
` == Hey, Mr. Troll == Why don't you learn what the word ``vandalism`` means? Better yet, why don't you resign as a sysop since you don't have a bloody clue what you're doing, Mr. 62K Edits. Big f*cking deal. I am so impressed. Learn your job, or leave it to someone who does. Why don't you try fixing those problems, rather than blocking me. The admins at WP are a bunch of incompetents on a power trip. :If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. : `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
623,262,871
|
` == I hope you have learned your lesson == 1. Do not be a troll. 2. Do not accuse a user of ``vandalism`` when he is guilty of no such thing. Why are you a sysop if you lack the requisite skills, knowledge, and experience? I will leave that as a point for you to ponder. Stop attacking the work of an editor more experienced than yourself. At Seneca College, `
| 2,014
| false
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,289,459
|
:In the meantime, I've specified the sort of significant controversy (media and political) I think was meant. Hope that's self-explanatory, but feel free to ask. 09:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
dev
| false
|
623,320,182
|
This is a bit questionable as he belongs to Christian and Islamic tradition as well, and Christian views on the age at which he begat Abram have not been mentioned hitherto.
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
test
| false
|
623,357,098
|
}}. It seems to me that I was right is stating that some Wiki contributors are small minded little tyrants who resent anyone who knows more and better than themselves and who feel duty bound to correct them. I see one of the posts that upset you is my copying Corbetts quote of fellatio yet you allowed Corbett to state and restate this childish lavatory humour. Unblock me immediately and get a grown up life. .
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| true
|
623,370,574
|
I did explain why you beyond incompetent worthless fuck!!! Two of the deletions were not cited and the third had 2 fake citations and the third was an editorial without any citations in turn.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| true
|
623,371,825
|
==German New Medicine== Because there is an almost fetish like obsession among contributors to preserve the misinformation in this article, there is no point in trying to correct the page but to rather allow this important information to be known to the 0.00000001% of users who look at the talk page. The citation for German New Medicine, titled Cancer Quackery: The Persistent Popularity of Useless, Irrational 'Alternative' Treatments does not contain ANY reference to either German New Medicine or Ryke Geerd Hamer. It is as though someone simply looked at the title, added it, and assumed (correctly) that most people would be too stupid to check. Professortimithy
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,372,124
|
I'm not going to collaborate with the non-academic.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,374,879
|
` :The albums are some of the ones which have been previously requested to be added but were not added (or removed) due to insufficient certification. The same is done at the List of best-selling music artists. :I also added Bolo Ta Ra Ra, A Voice on the Ocean, and The Sound of Music, which were massive sellers in India, China and the US/Europe respectively, but have no (online) available certifications.''' “'” `
| 2,014
| true
|
article
|
random
|
train
| false
|
623,375,749
|
:I was going to suggest you read Daniel Paul We Were Not the Savages for another pov regarding native conduct vs. European conduct in the wars. Paul does note that white historians have defended Amherst despite he and Bouquet saying exactly what they thought about what they were doing and whom they were doing it to. //
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,394,222
|
` It seems that the Wikipedia's response to being wrong is to simply censor ``indefinitely`` those who show them that they are wrong. Professor Clarence Timithy `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,412,188
|
` :Noting that you are blocking for comments regarding you, I'll let the great John Stuart Mill try to explain to you how ridiculous you're making yourself look: :In other words, it stings because it's so true, you're mad because you can't think of anything to say in response, and as the person criticized you shouldn't take it upon yourself to decide whether the criticism is appropriate. :I doubt I'll appeal this since there's more use letting it stand as a 48-hour monument to your thin-skinned pettiness. Along those lines I'd appreciate it if you'd note this block in the ANI discussion unless you'd prefer others not see your action side by side with the ``offense`` that prompted it. : `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,414,561
|
` :P.S. Will you be blocking as well? After all, he called you an ``amateur`` that must have stung pretty bad too. Or , who called you ``a stereotypical Wikipedian, who makes a large amount of similar changes to pages, despite having had no evidence of being previously interested in any of them`` (not by name, of course, but then I didn't call you by name either you just seemed to know it was you that I was referring to funny, isn't it). Ritchie also mentioned that ``One of the reasons hit and run editors have gained prominence in [the area of trivial formatting changes] is that writing the encyclopaedia has become more difficult. The quality of work has increased in some areas, which makes it harder to contribute without good knowledge in the subject matter and sources. Fiddling with the formatting seems to be a suitable alternative passtime``. That must really hurt. You should definitely block for that!`
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
623,420,881
|
Perhaps the problem is most of you contributors treat you contributions like little girls treat their Barbie dolls and jealously protect them. refusing to accept modification and extra information is totally against the ethos of Wiki
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,420,980
|
Perhaps you small minded people might try understand the Wiki ethos which is education of the masses. treating your contributions as precious children like little girls treat their Barbie dolls is totally contrary to Wiki ethos.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,421,419
|
I am rather saddened by the small minded self righteous hypocrisy that pervades Wiki these days. Wiki was founded to educate the general public but so many contributors feel their contribution to be so magnificent that it needs no further information and the block additions the way little girls jealously protect their Barbie Dolls.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
train
| false
|
623,421,528
|
A child name Ohnoitsjamie - a childish user name if ever there was has blocked my informative additions yet quite happiy allow Corbetts fellatio post.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
test
| false
|
623,435,400
|
` == FYI. == The poorly-written section in the Seige of Fort Pitt with the heading entitled ``Biological warfare was ineffective`` [sic] was added only yesterday by an anonymous IP account who is currently blocked and should not be editing with sockpuppets while they are blocked, unless they want to be blocked longer. // `
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
623,451,059
|
::::, perhaps you'll be kind enough to post a mention of this block at the ANI thread. I want it in the record there before it gets archived. Bgwhite apparently prefers to work under cover of darkness.
| 2,014
| true
|
user
|
blocked
|
dev
| false
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.