rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
639,816,978
== Propaganda platform Wikipedia == They want to keep Syriac people as a redirect to the Assyrian people article! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_December_19
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
639,817,124
` == WP:AGF == I think you should have a good look at yourself before you criticise others like you did with me here. You may not have realised it but you were a hairsbreadth away from insulting me accusing me of ``gravedancing``. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
639,817,178
::: A vast majority of their articles are from their 2x main staff Andy and Ernesto, with regular columns from Rick Falkvinge. Actual guest contributions are very few
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
639,817,258
make bad faith accusations and assumptions against
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
639,817,708
::You to.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
639,818,107
My edits were in fact in good faith, which both the editor and administrator should've assumed from the start, but I will promise to if unblocked cease contacting this editor and the blocking administrator.
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
false
639,819,409
`::::::Wikipedia articles are not ``owned`` by anyone, even if one person wrote the whole article. They can always be re-edited by someone else, if it is demonstrated that the article does not meet wikipedia requirements. However what has happened to this article is that editors who evidently know nothing about Marx or about the subjectmatter have messed it up until it has become nonsense. A rewrite is therefore required. I suppose in self-criticism that when I originally wrote the article, I did not reference it systematically. But the way it is now, it is largely rubbish. `
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
639,822,833
== Tallin bus route list == Please review your decision, as I think I've just proven in my reply that your conclusions are totally unsupportable. Based on all available evidence, it seems to me to be obvious that a list of bus routes of a major European capital city would indeed survive an attempt to delete it, even in 2014. Indeed, I think a good case could be made that this should be an automatic assumption, at least for capital cities or cities over a certain size - I don't see the point of forcing people to jump through the same hoops every single time when you can just as easily apply a few logical tests to accurately predict what the outcome would be of a proper review of all available literature in each case where it involves a typical modern city, one which by necessity has an established and regulated bus route network (which Davey is of course, not doing in any of these cases).
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
639,826,086
` He certainly used mixed bunches a lot, but in this case I think the yellow roses are all the same type. Those that eventually show the ``quartered`` look in the middle (where the central petals are shorter and fold around one another to make sort-of divisions, often looking like 4 lines radiating from the centre) often look in earlier stages as if they might produce the high-centered form of a ``modern`` rose instead. For example, this gallery shows a ``normal modern`` flower starting to open that later opens to have the denser petals in the middle. I think there might be three different types in that bunch, the yellow roses, the little red ones with the delicate bracts, and that other leaf in the right foreground. `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
639,852,652
` == Steve_Munro == I saw your notice asking people to ask you first before making ``helpful`` edits to this page. Please review the COI policy on Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest. While the page is about you, you don't own the page(mind you Wikipedia does take biographies of living people serious as it can cause harm) nor should you be editing it. `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
639,882,538
== Terrorism in Australia template == Hi, The discussion I referred to in my revert of your edit is archived at Talk:2014 Sydney hostage crisis/Archive 2#Terrorism box. Regards,
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
639,888,478
` :: I'm not sure what your mother tongue is, but I notice that you also erroneously believe that an untruth is the same as a lie or deliberate deception. In English they are not. Motivation makes the difference. :: Those editors are referring to one particular situation where, very loosely speaking, Breitbart website got a 100% Pants on Fire rating. They aren't saying that it never gets anything right. Generally speaking (thus not about this specific incident), Breitbart.com has gotten lots of Pants on Fire ratings, which shows they have very little credibility and very poor fact checking. They have also been caught several times running very deceptive ``punking``, so they actually do engage in deliberate deception at times. Breitbart and James O'Keefe ran plenty of such scams and were caught several times. Be careful about believing them. `
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
639,900,329
== He should have been in BFDI as Ice cube == Same name
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
639,944,774
` =SURPRISE!= /``\ |\./| | | | | |>~<| | | /'\| |/'\.. /~\| | | | \ | =[@]= | | \ | | | | | \ | ~ ~ ~ ~ |` ) | / \ / \ / \ _____ / |//''`\| | (( +==)) | |\_|_//| `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
639,951,618
, it wasn't the total length of the article that worried me, but the relative size of the different sections. Origin contains 11 lines, which covers 400 or more years of the history of lace. Contemporary is 16 lines, covering just the present day, with minute details such as several lines of the locations of one, very specific, type of contemporary lace. I wouldn't want to get rid of this altogether, but I don't think it belongs here. There SHOULD be a section on contemporary lace, but it should be shorter. I must admit that I don't like very long Wikipedia articles. I find them hard to read when I don't know much about the subject. I prefer an overview article at top, then links to different sections, so I can explore the area that interests me. A block of text just makes me feel I have to read the lot. If you put in details on modern lace fences in the main article, then why not put in details of every single lace style, historic or modern? Because that really WOULD make the article too long! Details, such as locations and dates, belong in an article about that specific type of lace. As we have done for all other types of lace. The articles are short, but we have tried to make sure that they aren't stubs. I am sure that is a better approach. But that's just my opinion!
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
639,967,270
REDIRECT Talk:No Games (Serani song)
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
639,967,366
REDIRECT Talk:No Games (album)
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
639,968,226
` == Assyrian propaganda on Wikipedia == Is this the way how you handle problems on Wikipedia by simply closing the case without finding a compromise? What happens, if I put Aramean continuity related topics to the ``Assyrian people`` article and everything will be deleted or distorted by Assyrian fascists again, because they think they are the owner of this article? They even have a WikiProject called Assyria and don't care about neutrality and support Assyrianism. We are fed up that all our contributions on Wikpedia even with references are getting removed without a valid reason. Are you there to check it and undo it? This is why I was in favour for a neutral common page called Assyrian/Syriac people, Syriac people or whatever focused only on our Christian heritage, where we all agree on. What's wrong with the idea to create articles within a common page to express each groups views? The current Assyrian people article mixed up with Assyrian plus Aramean topics would led to edit wars again. Read this Link and see how Assyrian fascists from all over the world try to Assyrianize everything on Wikipedia: http://www.assyrianvoice.net/forum/index.php?topic=16628.95;wap2 `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
639,984,412
` == Davey2010 == I just read WP:BATTLE and WP:AGF, and accordingly I find your message to Davey mentioning me in that context (while deliberately trying to hide it from me) as extremely upsetting. I have nothing personal against Davey (despite what he claims), I am certainly not trying to make him afraid or upset or otherwise miserable. If he tries to claim I am, I will vigorously defend myself against such lies. If anyone has been treated unfairly, it has been me by him - he reported me for being a VANDAL for crying out loud! I assume you know exactly how wrong that was (I sadly only properly realised that after the event). AGF says ``If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives without clear evidence.`` Well, I have quite a lot of clear evidence now that Davey's lack of care in the subject area of buses/bus transport can only really be explained by him having a motive that is harmful to Wikipedia (to degrade the overall quantity and quality of its content on the subject). How else can you explain the phenomena of someone who claims to be a bus enthusiast and know a lot about buses, not having any clue how or why a list of trolleybus routes would be encyclopedic? Entire books have been written on just that subject! This is just one example. I have many more. If he had never claimed to know a lot about this subject, then yes, I could have assumed that this was just a case of amateurish but entirely innocent intent. But not any more. He clearly has a very specific idea about what Wikipedia should and should not contain on this subject, and it is quite clearly not explicitly supported by any of the rules. So, he is pushing the envelope far beyond the limits, and in some cases there's only one word to describe the things he says - pure lies. I'm sorry he's upset by the fact that I have the subject knowledge to be able to spot when he's not being truthful about certain things he says on this subject, and I'm sorry that he's upset that when he says something here breaks some rule or other, I actually take the time to check if that's true or not. But do not for a second confuse that with someone who is genuinely upset by someone stalking them or questioning their motives for no good reason. I could even go so far to say these might even be crocodile tears, since he doesn't appear to have been this sensitive over other issues where people are disagreeing with him - indeed he seems quite capable of telling people in no uncertain terms what he thinks of them. This is no shrinking violet, that's for sure. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
639,987,535
::Yes, I gather that this is standard procedure on Wikipedia in situations where replying would require the other person to admit they were wrong, or have otherwise not fully thought out their position. It seems to be the Wikipedia version of taking the 5th, albeit deployed in even more cynical ways. I was going to follow up with a specific example of how a few days ago Davey made a massively bad faith assumption about me, but I guess there's no point now.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
639,995,776
` ::::You're welcome. When I spot articles like this where the assertion of importance is four or five paragraphs in I try to cut the newbie a bit more slack as they are obviously genuine newbies and unfamiliar with our deletion processes. ''Chequers'' `
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
639,998,667
the trade The math of the days The times and the age But you want how you like Aim high man why not? Sun Moon starry y'alls Each and every all of y'alls There's math and there's dealers and players and me
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
640,000,064
` :::::::::That's because the quote you bring isn't quite accurate. It should be ``largest number of voters per would be seat`` (that is number of seats + 1). I'll find the actual election law tomorrow. `
2,014
true
article
random
test
false
640,001,322
` == Kurds are not Iranian == Kurdish people are not ``Iranians.`` Just because there is a possiblity that the Medians were ancestors of the Kurds does not in any way make the Kurds ``Iranian.`` Just because Kurdish is a bit similar to languages like Persian, does not make Kurds ``Iranian.`` Kurdish people are descendants of many different people that inhabitated Kurdistan such as Hurrians, Gutians, Mittani, Cordune, and much more. Kurds are not ``Iranian people.`` I have many many reliable scholarly sources on the Kurds, and it does not mention anything about being ``Iranian.`` Kurds have their own histroy, and are a distinct people. The term Iranian, in itself is wrong to describe. Today, the term is used to describe a person who lives or is from Iran. Therefore, many people will be heavily confused when they see this term. Not only that, but like I said, Kurds are not Iranian in the first place. I have many sources to back it up and I don't know why Wikipedia allowed such false information to be posted up. I am not denying that the Kurdish lanugage can be described as a lanugage that is part of the Indo -European family of Northwestern Iraninan languages, but to say that the Kurds themselves are Iranian is completley false. Kurds have a long history in the Middle East and were even mentioned by the Sumerians. Kurds are descendants of many different people and there is not only historical evidence to back that up, but genetic evidence as well. Dont think so? Then go search for yourself.`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,005,570
` == Superblocks == The Superblocks section claims ``Superblock mirrors are kept at fixed locations:[77] 64 KiB into every block device, with additional copies at 64 MiB, 256 GiB and 1 PiB. When a superblock mirror is updated, its generation number is incremented. At mount time, the copy with the highest generation number is used. All superblock mirrors are updated in tandem, except in SSD mode which alternates updates among mirrors to provide some wear levelling.`` And (https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/User:Wtachi/On-disk_Format#Superblock) claims ``Note that btrfs only recognizes disks with a valid 0x1 0000 superblock; otherwise, there would be confusion with other filesystems. `` I haven't seen any relevant information in (http://btrfs.ipv5.de/) indicating anything about the current state of superblock use. In old link - now seemingly defunct but still cached by Google - (https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/btrfs-devel/2008-February/000513.html), Chris Mason writes that: Yes, SSDs are a big target of mine, and so the parts that are not currently favorable for SSDs will be changed. The big problem right now is that btrfs writes to a fixed super block for every commit. That will change to a rotating set of fixed super blocks to lower wear and improve redundancy. * Is there any information if btrfs still hammers the same fixed superblock locations? * Is there any information about the implications that a broken primary superblock will make btrfs no longer recognize the disk, implying that this single (but constantly updated) data structure is a single-point-of-failure? * Is there any information about the implications for SSD wear leveling if no change has been introduced? And especially how common is it that the SSD uses region-based wear leveling in which each superblock will only rotate among a limited number of flash blocks of the SSD? Or where the two first superblocks might even end up in the same wear-leveling region? `
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
640,032,901
:Please keep this in mind.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
640,045,157
== Your accusation that I am Astbam == Please note that it was Astbam who put the seed into the mind of Davey that the Nu-Venture article should be deleted for lack of notability. I only got involved in Wikipedia 10 days later, in an effort to keep it. Since the common interest in Nu-Venture at around the same time was the only part of your accusation which I thought had any real substance to it, would you please consider withdrawing the accusation, now that it appears to have been misguided (you perhaps didn't make the connection because it wasn't Astbam who actually made the proposal, and for some reason he didn't actually follow that suggestion up by voting delete himself either). Whatever people think of me, I'm not the sort of idiot who goes around getting articles put up for AFD just so I can then say they should be kept. Everything else you have presented is easily explained by the fact Davey and Charles do the same things to the same people for the same apparent reasons, meaning it's more than likely to piss the victims off in the same way. That's all that happened here.
2,014
true
user
blocked
test
false
640,056,595
== Apology == You blocked me once under another IP and it angered me. I was determined to take revenge. Then I discovered your wife is an honest to god African prostitute with AIDS and I realized nothing I could do would make your life worse than it is. A married virgin, and you'll probably die a virgin. You're like the unicorn of white nights. This is gold man, thanks so much, honestly. -
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
640,062,734
` == Josh == Josh, I perfectly understood you. I have added a new topic on the Kurds talk page showing my viewponts about 2 days ago, but I cant see it anymore. Therefore, I have created another today. I do not, however, see where the consensus was made that the Kurds are ``Iranian.`` Can you please link me to it?`
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,068,296
:The article Refuge Patrick was deleted because it did not credibly demonstrate the significance of the subject of the article. In order to meet wikipedia's inclusion standards the article would need to meet the relevant notability guideline but did nothing to suggest that it would meet the guideline. The account is still available and has not been blocked.
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
640,130,675
::So according to WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, apart from those domestic leg of International flights by Air India, all domestic destinations which are routed through Delhi or Mumbai (in case of Jet Airways and Air India) or Chennai and Hyderabad (in case of Spice Jet) cannot be mentioned. Did I get it right?
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
640,135,752
` == Boogie Nights == This is not a ``civil`` comment. I am accusing you of being a philistine who has never read the Bible, incidents from which are not typically placed in italics because they are not discrete works of literature. Reverting your idiotic, unfounded reversion. `
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
true
640,136,944
== Cry yourself to sleep == Seriously.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,138,209
==@midnight episodes== There's a discussion on weather or not we should add upcoming guests to the episode list page.link.
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
640,156,053
== Why is this about Japan? == Why does this article make it seem sake is from Japan? There are MANY nations that drink this and it is indigenous to. In fact, Japan copied this from China. Biased much? Article needs a total overhaul....
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
640,156,372
` :::The thing is, for the Vietnam War, we do have other articles for the various stages of US involvement. 515 `
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
640,159,303
== Combichrist == What about the Combichrist lyrics?
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
640,163,336
:I would agree with WWGB, it is there to make it clear that they are related airlines but not actually the same operator.
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
640,169,776
== Global account == Hi Daniel! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, — 
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
640,171,888
== Spelling lesson == You spelled butthurt wrong. Just saying
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
640,173,331
::::I see. I was wondering because some of the photos are black and white and look like they are from the late 1800s to early 1900s. I guess I'll work on the campaignboxes in my userspace and test them in previews on the actual pages with saving to see how it looks. But I can do that some other time. And I found where the images like that Taishi Ci one are from. They're from the Zengxiang quantu Sanguo yanyi (增像全图.三国演义.上) edition of the Qing print and I believe the illustrator must have died more than 50 years ago; unless they drew the pictures in their teenager years. For instance, say the edition was released in 1912 when the Qing fell. Now lets say the illustrator was 20 at the time. If he lived to be 70 (which is around the time people start croaking I guess) he would have died in 1962. 50 years later it would be 2012. But the only date for a Qing dynasty edition would be 1906 (although I don't know if thats the Zengxiang quantu Sanguo yanyi? Maybe Mao Zonggang drew these in an earlier edition in the 1600s or 1700s?) and I doubt the person who drew these would have been as young as 20 in 1906.
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
640,184,166
|| needs-infobox = yes| needs-persondata = yes | needs-photo = yes
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
false
640,199,905
== Buddhas == This article makes no reference to the Buddhas which were in Bamiyan. I understand they were destroyed, but atleast a small note would suffice. Ditto for other destroyed structures.
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
640,204,283
== Question for you.... == Is this content verifiable? You two seem to know each other? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2laUr8W7ag0
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
640,204,779
== Dave Brodbeck...You are popular!! == 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2laUr8W7ag0 Have you shown this to our class? 2. https://sites.google.com/site/davebrodbeckcaughtonwikipedia/
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
640,206,176
` So Ian T...Is this a fair link to add? It looks like Dave Brodbeck (User Dbrodbeck) gets taking to ``School`` no pun intended... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2laUr8W7ag0 The sources are abundant as you see on this topic. Where do you go from there?`
2,014
false
article
blocked
train
false
640,207,472
== Dave! LOL You have so many user names!!! == You're a fraud DAVE
2,014
false
user
blocked
dev
true
640,207,821
== You keep erasing information that's none of your business...You QUACK == How did you deny all the sources in the movie proving HIV is a fraud? You are part of the problem on Wikipedia. You power tripping pussy. https://sites.google.com/site/davebrodbeckcaughtonwikipedia/ You're next VQuakr.
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
true
640,208,833
` :Yeah, I do agree, but we surely can do better than a three-word or even two-word disambiguator. `
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
640,238,473
:I am sorry but I completely disagree. All that company stuff is way to detailed for an article about the individual. If they meet the WP:CORP guidelines, write articles about them and put all that stuff, suitable depuffed, into those articles. You also did a wholesale reversion leaving in unnecessary crap about mother Teresa, the woman who rented him a room etc. This is not encyclopedic and does not belong in the article, maybe in a Bollywood movie about his life in 30 years time.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
640,241,977
News conference is scheduled and pending, but it has not occurred yet. You can't put a news conference in the past tense ('held') when it is being held on the day after you insinuate it has already occurred. Marc Yu
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,256,674
` :::*Nice painting! It's not covered in my Fairies in Victorian Art book though ... - `
2,014
true
user
random
test
false
640,265,138
Really this isn't Your Edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beartooth_(band)&oldid;=638137449
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
640,265,356
December 15 at 02:58 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beartooth_(band)&action;=history. Just about done with you here
2,014
false
user
blocked
train
false
640,269,967
` ===Proposal=== Look all I am saying is that the term ``Iranian`` is a very loose term and people can get easily confused when they see this. Iranic would be a better term to use. Nontheless, there is no doubt that the Kurdish language is a bit similar to other languages such as Persian but there is also a difference as well. I am speaking as a Kurd myself. There is evidence that the Kurds have the highest chance out of all the other ethnic groups of being descendants of the Medes, all one has to do is look at lingustics. Although, it is also important to know that the Kurds have been in the middle east for a very very long time, and there have been many other empires/people as well. There have also been, for example, claims that Kurds are also descendants of the Gutians. It all boils down to what you believe, but to say that the Kurds are an Iranian people, is sort of going overboard. Kurds have been mentioned for a very longtime by many different people, including the Sumerians! Nonetheless, I think there should be a change. I sort of agree with the Proposal above but I believe it can be better. Heres what I think should be written Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East that inhabit adjacent parts of Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syira known as Kurdistan. The Kurds speak a language known as Kurdish, which form a subgroup of the NorthWestern Iranian languages. The Kurds are known to be an Iranic people because of close linguistic and cultural ties with other Iranians. The Kurds are also known to be descendants of the Medes, according to many scholars. Somewhere along those lines. Saying that Kurds are an ``Iranian ethnic group`` is is vague, confusing, and somewhat mis-leading. What I wrote is a bit more clear and I wrote why they are considered an Iranic people with the sentences supporting it. Notice how I also said a language known as Kurdish. I do not know on what insane consensus that people decided it should be ``Kurdish language(s).`` Kurdish is one language which is mainly based of two dialects, that are spoken by almost all Kurds. Those two dialects are Kurmanji and Sorani, both of which are highly similar. All Kurds regard their language as one. I am a Kurdish Sorani speaker and I can understand a Kurmanji speaker perfectly. Kurds in Turkey, Syria, and Half of Iraq speak Kurmanji. Then the other Half of Iraqi Kurdistan speak Sorani, with Kurds in Iran speaking Kurdish Sorani as well. There are also a few other dialects such as Hawrami which is spoken by about 10% of Kurds. Nonetheless, the Kurdish language is one language with 2 main dialects, both of which are highly similar to each other. Bawer1 Bawer`
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,271,554
` Just want you to uphold the standard you hold others to. Such as Myself. Also I have no idea why some edits are under one ``IP`` and Others aren't. Comcast is weird sometimes. Plus I lose all my old edit history. Which I am not pleased about. Someday Ill call them and ask why my ``IP`` changes on its own.Also its not ``warrior`` to removes a false reference. Its called accurate. `
2,014
false
user
random
dev
false
640,274,167
` There is no argument. You seem pretty mad and emotionally charged over nothing. ``Argue`` not even close. There isn't one spot in that original reference that you added, that says they are hardcore punk. I told you about it. Wheres the ``argument`` ? Its cool. I don't need to know why you thought that was accurate. I would bet a million you're going to keep coming back for the last ``statement``. Id let the small stuff in life, go. `
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
false
640,286,969
` == Rewriting Definitions in Lede == The second definition previously given in the article, ``name-recipient``, was absurd, and was not supported by the reference given. Everything, if there's a word for it, is a ``name-recipient``. An eponym is a person whose name is given to some place or thing, or it is the name itself. It is not the place or thing so named. I have accordingly rewritten the lede to eliminate the absurdity. The adjective, eponymous means, being or having to do with an eponym: i.e., the person or thing for whom something is named (e.g., ``the eponymous founder of Walt Disney Productions``). One dictionary (Collins) also allows it to mean, ``named for its creator or central character`` (e.g. ``R.E.M.'s eponymous album, 'R.E.M.'``); but Merriam-Webster doesn't. I have accordingly attributed that sense to ``recent usage``. The rest of the article still needs a thorough rewriting.  |  `
2,014
true
article
random
dev
false
640,289,846
Apollo 11 and N is always refuted!== In a conventional calculation of the fuel balance, assuming an effective exhaust velocity of 2600 m / s, a fuel shortcoming of over 160 t for the Apollo mission would. Its commitment to an effective exhaust velocity calculations of 3700 m / s; 've never been reached in 1969 and currently can not be achieved, it would fuel a deficit of over 70 t come. Because: For the confluence with the lunar orbit, the CSM would be decelerated with trailed LM of 2.4 km / s (lunar escape velocity) on the Moon's orbital speed of 1.7 km / s. These would be a fuel quantity of [(2.72 high (0.7: 3.7) -1] * 45.3 = t 9.5 t have been necessary for the moon landing, a propellant mass of [(2,72 would highly. (1.7: 3.7) -1] * 15 t = 8.8 t The start of the moon would have [(2.72 high (1.7. 3.7) -1] * 4.7 = t 2.7 t required and made the escape from the gravitational pull of the moon would have [(2.72 high (0.7: 3.7) -1]. * 30 t = 6.3 t rocket fuel requires for the confluence with the. Earth's orbit would be [(2.72 high (3.3: 3.7) -1] * 30 t = 44 t of fuel have been necessary sum up thus resulting 71.3 t Now there stood only about 15 tons of rocket fuel to.. available (4 t CSM and LM 11 t). Thus, Apollo 11 and N were refuted forever. ==
2,014
false
article
random
train
false
640,293,271
DeCausa you are such an idiot. I was talking about the origin of the Kurds. Since Kurds are heterogeneous people, I used that statement. You need to read what I wrote thoroughly. Wikipedia is such full of crap, I gave many links to my statement on Joshs page. I know what I am writing is facts. I did what you asked by writing in this talk page. Wikipedia even refers to the Kurdish language as language(s)which does not even make any sense. I am a Kurd myself, I know what I am talking about. Please give me at least 2 reliable sources that refers to the Kurdish language as language(s). The facts I wrote about the Kurdish language can even by seen on Wikipedia. I have information. I have studied. You act as if I am just using information I got out of nowhere. When in fact, it is those people that you allow to change information, which create these problems. You did not even allow anybody to look at my proposal before you jumped in, I posted this proposal only a few hours ago.
2,014
true
article
blocked
dev
true
640,293,324
*'Infobox war faction' is most applicable, 'Infobox country' is really intended for countries as defined by international law and I don't think DPR is there yet, and Wikipedia isn't a WP:CRYSTALBALL.
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
640,293,548
== DeCausa == DeCausa you are such an idiot. I was talking about the origin of the Kurds. Since Kurds are heterogeneous people, I used that statement. You need to read what I wrote thoroughly. Wikipedia is such full of crap, I gave many links to my statement on Joshs page. I know what I am writing is facts. I did what you asked by writing in this talk page. Wikipedia even refers to the Kurdish language as language(s)which does not even make any sense. I am a Kurd myself, I know what I am talking about. Please give me at least 2 reliable sources that refers to the Kurdish language as language(s). The facts I wrote about the Kurdish language can even by seen on Wikipedia. I have information. I have studied. You act as if I am just using information I got out of nowhere. When in fact, it is those people that you allow to change information, which create these problems. You did not even allow anybody to look at my proposal before you jumped in, I posted this proposal only a few hours ago.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
true
640,294,081
I did what you asked, but you are acting in a wrong way.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,295,615
` Here are links to the Kurdish language. http://www.omniglot.com/writing/kurdish.htm http://www.institutkurde.org/en/language/ http://www.kurdishacademy.org/?q=node/41 http://www.krg.org/p/p.aspx?l=12&p;=215 Please tell me where do any of you see that it is says language(s). Kurdish is one language!! Just like how Kurds can not be regarded as an ``Iranian`` people. That is the wrong term to use. Please look at what I wrote above.`
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,299,408
What nationalism? Almost every source regards the Kurdish language as one. Out of all the sources you managed to find 4 that said otherwise. One of which, actually did somewhat agree with me. Look at link number 9, second paragraph. It amazes me at how bias you are. Just because I am speaking the truth makes me a nationalist? God, how much did they offer you to be so biased? I am constantly showing facts. You did not even allow anyone to take a good look at my Proposal before you jumped in. Do you actually think your doing a good job? Wow, wikipedia amazes me more and more each day.
2,014
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,302,541
Well, first we have to know what we have here. If you want to make a POV argument, this is another arrow in your quiver. – 
2,014
true
article
random
train
false
640,304,286
== Vandalism and Semi-Protection == This article has been vandalized numerous times and I think it needs a lock on the article asap!!!
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
640,311,966
` == Invitation == {| style=``background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid Black;`` |rowspan=``2`` style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;`` | You've been invited to be part of WikiProject Cosmology |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;`` | Hello. Your contributions to Wikipedia have been analyzed carefully and you're among the few chosen to have a first access to a new project. I hope you can contribute to it by expanding the main page and later start editing the articles in its scope. Make sure to check out the Talk page for more information! Cheers |}`
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
640,316,432
* You left your reply on . I prefer to have the discussion in a single location, so, if it not too much trouble to you, I will reply here. : I prefer the one field per line style, for several reasons. Placing the citation within the template is supported, and, by doing so, I cause the least disruption to the article's revision history. I don't rewrite references left by other people, unless they are old-fashioned bare-urls, or are seriously broken. If I add fields, like | archivedate = | archiveurl = | deadurl = no fields, I do so in whatever style the reference previously used. It is more effort for me, but I do so out of respect for the contributor who originally added the reference. I don't want to unnecessarily undermine the utility of the revision history mechanism for them. : I think it is completely reasonable for me to generally expect the same courtesy from other contributors. I think it is reasonable for me to expect that courtesy from you.
2,014
true
user
random
train
false
640,345,272
::Fair enough, Thanks ).
2,014
false
user
random
train
false
640,360,369
:Thanks for the response. I am starting here from scratch, I am familiar with basic editing only and have fair idea about wikipedia's philosophy, haven't experienced the different ways with which I can contribute. I read that detecting vandalism requires you to first do some course on it. But I haven't gone through any course. Broad areas of interest are Computers, Geography, Technology, Physics, IT, Web, Indian polity. I would be consistent but not very active, as I am busy with some other jobs too. I would be happy to provide almost any type of contribution. Please suggest me tasks as per your experience.
2,014
true
user
random
dev
false
640,380,707
== Semi-protected edit request on 31 December 2014 == please removeCause of death Suicide by vehicular impact, this is unconfirmed and simply assumed.
2,014
false
article
random
dev
false
640,404,193
==History of Dominion of Pakistan== I am planning to write History of Dominion of Pakistan article.
2,014
true
user
blocked
dev
false
640,413,002
oranjblud is an idiot. stop sticking up for him, redrose64.
2,014
false
user
blocked
test
true
640,421,441
` @Josh3580 Either you are blind to the truth, or you are biased as well. Out all the sources, this guy managed to four that disagreed with my statement. When in fact almost all the other sources say otherwise. Why did he only pick those four, it is actually 3 by the way since on of them is irrelevant. This guy DeCausa ignored all the majority of the sources that are present and only picked out the very few that disagree with me. Is that bias or what? I am telling you that ``Iranain`` is the wrong term to describe Kurds and the Kurdish language is one language. I am stating obvious facts that almost any historian or person would agree with me. You say that I need to submit a Proposal, well here it is? I gave links to support my statement, and I carefully explained why my statement was correct.`
2,014
true
article
blocked
test
false
640,433,282
Do not vandalize Pakistan International Airlines page.
2,014
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,451,725
a serial sectarian contributor whose contribution are limited to adding Ahmadiyya agenda to all Islam related page, now has added Wikipedia:Wikistalking to his portfolio. This proposal is seconded by his fanboy .
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,452,077
::Another contributor has joined in to censor this talk page.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,452,182
a serial sectarian contributor whose contribution are limited to adding Ahmadiyya agenda to all Islam related page, now has added Wikipedia:Wikistalking to his portfolio. This proposal is seconded by his fanboy .
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,452,249
:Please make formal report to Wikipedia.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,452,517
::::Thanks. But dont remove anything.
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
640,452,866
` :Actually, it would be ; but this problem seems to have appeared following recent edits to Phineas and Ferb (season 4) - perhaps that should be fixed instead? `
2,015
true
article
random
test
false
640,454,594
== Warning == Personal attacks and insults like this are not acceptable here. It is acceptable to privately disagree with another Wikipedian, however plastering this sort of content over multiple talk pages is not the way to resolve disputes. Knock it off, please. . :Please make formal report to Wikipedia.
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,487,175
REDIRECT Talk:Foreign Parcel Trading Company
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
640,488,256
actually this is the largest forum in Urdu language and is popular in Urdu community, my English isn't good so i didn't write much but someone else can expand this article with better understanding of English.
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,511,985
Thanks, 78.26. I hope your holiday was as enjoyable as mine. —
2,015
true
user
random
test
false
640,517,523
==South Africa 1970 == The party was selected and the fixtures listed. It is a cancelled tour and therefore requires a listing. Bearing in mind the fuss it caused, it really does need one, at least from the political viewpoint.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
false
640,525,515
:You insert original research in the article. It is not allowed.
2,015
true
article
blocked
dev
false
640,525,994
and original translation
2,015
true
article
blocked
test
false
640,539,277
` ==Happy New Year!== Dear , HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions! From a fellow editor, This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by (see ``invisible note``). `
2,015
true
user
random
train
false
640,539,297
` == De - Pausa == You know DeCausa, you can report me as much as you want. As a matter of fact, even if my account shuts down I don't care. Once I tell the Kurdsih community what is going on here, they will also arrive. I find it amazing that you only used four sources that supported your bias, and ignored the rest of them. Literally, almost all of the sources say the Kurdish language is one, and there are a vast amount of sources regarding the Kurdish language. I will not allow this injustice to take place. My people are not ``Iranians`` and the Kurdish language is one language. I find it amusing at how bias you are. You ignored all the links that I showed you by saying it did not meet Wikiepdia guidlines, which is crap in the first place. You then managed to find only very few that disagreed with me. Oh by the way, editing my posts on your page is very cowardly. It shows how afraid and bias you are, and it also shows that you should not be doing any work for Wikipedia. Mr. De Pausa.`
2,015
true
user
blocked
train
false
640,552,594
` :: Okay that makes sense. It can be assumed younger students are looking up butter and most likely the process in which it is made, leading to the vandalism. Thanks for the info! ==Butter alternatives== In response to 's request for justification on adding a section on butter alternatives, I added statements from and links to scientific studies talking about cardiovascular benefits of substituting other things for butter as well as some layman reports by health authorities which also have published on the concept of butter alternatives. I integrated the health history into this new butter alternatives section as well. It might be the case that a ``butter alternatives`` article should be created independently and that various articles should link to it, but even in that case, I feel that it is merited to summarize publications on this topic in this article. Thoughts? :Where profits are involved one must be very careful about the claims by and on behalf of competing products. We should not be implying that one product needs to be replaced with another. Listing alternatives without saying why (in that part of the article) is thus a problem. There have been many studies suggesting all sorts of things about butter and its competitors. We can report what reliable sources say about it, but cannot take a position on the matter. Also, if we imply that butter needs replacing because of alleged problems, we really need to apply equivalent standards to the alternatives. Potential problems have been found with at least some of the alternatives. To just list alternatives, thereby implying that butter is problematic, without mentioning issues with the alternatives, is unacceptable. It would probably be going too far to list ALL the issues, so I'd suggest leaving the alternatives out. ::I hesitate to take your suggestion to leave the alternatives section out entirely but I would like to respond to your concerns in some way. My first thought would be that I could fork this into an article called Butter substitution, then have the list, a health discussion, and advice from organizations about doing the substitution. ::About profits - there are areas on Wikipedia where there is risk of commercial intervention but I do not see unbranded food concepts as being particularly high risk at this time. I should mention that I am sharing this information on behalf of Consumer Reports, the United States equivalent of your Australian Choice (Australian consumer organisation). We publish food and health information from the US government and medical organizations, and I came to this butter article because of our own work. My organization does have a bias which says that people should consume less fat. I would like to make a health claim here that says that health organizations commonly give the advice that people should eat less butter. I cited the Cochrane Collaboration, Mayo Clinic, National Heart Foundation of Australia, and my own organization as saying this, but to go into more detail would be as you said, undue. ::How would you feel about my forking this content into its own article, putting everything there, and then keeping a statement in this article which said something like ``Many health organizations advise that consumers should use less fats in their diet and cooking and eat less butter because of the cardiovascular problems caused by the fat in many people's diets. In addition to eating less butter, these organizations recommend replacing butter with butter substitutes which are purported to have fewer adverse effects.`` I would also look for information about the health benefits of butter, if I can find any sources. How does this strike you? :::Are there no conflicting opinions, even scientific ones? Are your ``proposed`` butter alternatives 100% harmless for all people in all situations? ::::I want to assume that there at least are defined positions taken by various organizations and associated with various re
2,015
true
article
blocked
train
false
640,571,085
== 'Neutral POV' in conflict with mainstream scientific consensus? == This article, like all Wiki's, purports to have:- i) 'Scientific focus: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and its content on scientific and quasi-scientific topics will primarily reflect current mainstream scientific consensus.' and ii) 'Neutral point of view as applied to science: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to pseudoscience.' Surely there is already a cultural bias, in the West, reflected in its science, which effectively imposes some kind of Conversion therapy (or its opposite?) on its citizens: there is a manufactured consensus, arrived at by undemocratic and concealed means, that 'it's okay to be LGBT,' which doesn't come clean about the physical and social consequences.
2,015
false
article
blocked
train
false
640,627,721
` ``But now I return to the remaining part of this Gentleman's memorie, haveing again brought him to live a countrey gentleman. Being freed of his military imployement etc .... ```
2,015
true
article
random
dev
false
640,678,847
I agree it is a very biased statement; I propose an edit of the sentence to remove political inferences
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
640,686,359
Exactly, the indictment won't affect whether or not Greg Abbott serves his term.
2,015
false
article
blocked
dev
false
640,686,766
Good Riddance, you irrational jerk, I'm glad you're gone and don't you ever come back.
2,015
false
user
blocked
train
true
640,708,052
== Why subway? == Why is this called a subway, when it's an el?
2,015
false
article
blocked
dev
false
640,726,490
and perhaps add a sentence about the critics on Giuccardini.
2,015
true
article
random
train
false
640,767,878
REDIRECT Talk:2004 Brit Awards
2,015
true
article
random
dev
false