dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
653,948,859	YES, that is precisely my point. That editor is using the sidebar genre list and not a prose review for sourcing. That's why I had hoped you'd back me up.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
653,957,145	:::* Thanks for looking up the rose.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
653,962,781	== but ew == He was a fαg which is against nature and is the most disgusting thing. Youre not a woman are you? Sexism is wrong. Being wrong is for women.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
653,963,098	:::: BUT i didnt attack you. Is it A-MORE-SHOUS or A-MORE-TEE-AS	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
653,963,241	== TP == PLZ C MY TORK PAGE	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
653,963,587	:::::::cool. Where did u get it from	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
653,967,204	` == Still unsure what you want, please let me know. == Hello, Regarding edits to Thomas Andrews Drake, John Kiriakou, and Jesselyn Radack For your benefit, I have logged in to prove my existence of having an account. I immediately returned to your talk page to see if there were any instructions for me to improve, or at least an explanation of your enigmatic ``edit war`` message having no other information to support it.... only to find you have deleted everything. Again, if you are the one I am supposedly in a ``war`` with, I have two requests a) please stop deleting relevant information and corrected reference detail which were incomplete and incorrect in prior versions (which you or someone keeps reverting them to). b) if you do not like the complete data nor the corrected references, will you please explain why and how I can improve to meet wikipedia standards? Tis quite odd that corrected detailed facts and references continue to be deleted, and replaced with incomplete detail and incorrect references... am confident wikipedia.org would prefer the former, not the later. If this is wrong, please explain why. If you are deleting corrected facts and corrected references, and continue to refuse to communicate factual reasons for this, I will then need to report your unprofessional actions to your supervisors and colleagues. Please communicate and explain what I possibly have done wrong and need to improve. V/R COL M.D.B., MD`	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
653,981,162	::::::::::Would you mind taking a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bochasanwasi_Shri_Akshar_Purushottam_Swaminarayan_Sanstha#Lead_Section_Neutrality.2C_Length_.26_Court_Proceedings_leading_to_excommunication_of_Shastri when you have a chance. I am interested in your opinion.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
653,982,021	` :Haha, all he did was tick my ``This user page has been vandalized X times`` counter up one, which is technically a meta-vandalism and a correct edit, I guess... :But hey, huge thanks for looking out for me! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
653,982,673	`:A couple of reasons, the first one being your misuse of the word ``anonymously``. :But summed it up pretty well. :> It may not be vandalism, but it is certainly not necessary. Gameplay images should only be included where they are absolutely needed : `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
653,983,729	` == A belated welcome! == ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Moonlightmedicine. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for . Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: * Introduction * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Contributing to Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Help pages * How to write a great article * Editor's index to Wikipedia Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
653,987,250	, 29 March 2015 (UTC) : Okay thanks 03:44	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
653,993,554	` :I would say it would be better to delete the word ``controversial`` if it offends. I think this idea of Communist opponents of ML is really a construction of this article. I think we should avoid this. `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
654,002,191	Refer for latest comment...	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,008,168	- I don't know why you have waded into the dispute (but I have heeded your advice & attempted to calm things down with , altho he doesn't seem to be a calming down sort of chap. Anyway trust this amply advises you of a change in situation and more than refutes something you attempted to make an allegation about sucking and illiteracy..?? It would be heartening were Wikipedia able to stick to facts & not impose MOS - much look forward to hearing. M Why did you get involved anyway?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,012,196	well I have re instated them and will continue to do so as they seem plainly constructive to me, and will not be dictated to	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,019,231	` == Disambiguation hatnote == Hi , I noticed that you removed the disambiguation hatnotes I'd recently added to both Easy Living (1937 film) and Easy Living (1949 film) with an edit summary explanation of ``-hatnote per WP:NAMB``[which links to section ``Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous``]. Let me share how/why I came to add the hatnotes and perhaps you'll be able to get a sense of why it might be in the best interest of readers to reconsider whether it's applicable to apply WP:NAMB to the instances at hand. I came across a passing mention of a film named ``Easy Living`` in a web article. It intrigued me and caught my interest but did not supply a specific release date. When I searched for ``Easy Living (film)`` it was initially—in practice, in a real life experience—ambiguous to me as a reader which Wikipedia article [``Easy Living (1937 film)`` or ``Easy Living (1949 film)``] would relate to the web article I was attempting to follow up on. So to aid future readers who might find themselves in similar circumstances I added hatnotes cross-referencing the two articles. I considered also adding a link in the hatnotes to the full existing Easy Living disambiguation page but decided such would be 'over-kill', adding length but not substance, as anyone searching just ``Easy Living`` would find themselves led there anyway. The ambiguity being addressed is specifically that which arises from there being two ``Easy Living (____ film)`` articles—so it seemed best to limit it to such. In the interest of better serving the greater Wikipedia readership, may we please restore the hatnotes? Or replace them with some variation to comparably serve the same purpose (i.e. to offer ``the least surprise`` and most ease of use to future readers interested in films named ``Easy Living``)? `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
654,021,339	& for an educated & more informed perspective qv: (altho I think things are so far gone with the MOS gang that only Wiki authorities can set this dispute back onto a proper footing, i.e. relaying the correct info to the public). M	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,023,821	::PS. perhaps you might like to review the processes of how Order of Saint John (chartered 1888) came to be - I am not in league with anyone so couldn't garner support but hopefully in my favour is that I do know my stuff (despite it presently being an uphill struggle to introduce it to Wiki). M	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,024,402	::::PPS. Could you please advise whether these self-styled MOS gurus have free reign to carry on such on incessant, obsessive & and uncivil fashion - I can't see how this works to Wiki's advantage if so?? M	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,025,794	Simple - look at your constant reversions to Rachel Treweek.	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
654,026,334	:::::I know you have & I amazed at the lengths you will go to.... qv: - but none of this solves the basic issue that I am correcting Wiki's info whereas you are trying to impose MOS which distorts the facts (or at least it does when you apply it). Anybody else you want to rally against me!! M	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
654,026,727	:::::::Yes I totally agree with you & I have asked to be put in touch with those who devised MOS because it is deficient/unsatisfactory in relaying the correct info. Well done! Now let's wait for the Administrators to report because they will no doubt the timeline of your (plural) allegations & how pitiful it is to have to keep defending myself like this. I sincerely trust that you & your cohorts will be blocked from touching any of my future edits (or they can block me). There must be a way of resolving this manic pursuit of MOS thereby disrupting considered editing. What a farce... M	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
654,031,660	:I do wish to appeal against this block & I should like you to review carefully the sequence of events. None of this course of events was instigated by me - I have called an Administrator by 'phone (whom I know to explain the situation). :What you have just done would imply guilt on my part (& whilst I don't claim to be perfect) this scenario is categorically none of my making & my messages to their Talk pages were in response to receiving message alerts from them by way of that red light - Mabelina 0 Talk - popping up at the top which I thought should be replied to? This hardly seems reasonable to me but no doubt the protagonists are chuffed to bits (I've already had a message from just to rub it in. The Order of Saint John is the major cause of this ruction - I think will provide you with a balanced view of the matter. Furthermore I guess you will have to decide whether you are with them or me - I have asked for an enquiry into their application of MOS which I trust will be forthcoming. Bottom line is that I add good info to Wiki whereas I am constantly harassed by a gang of about 3/4 people about MOS. Quality info (with incorrect MOS) or MOS at all costs - you decide. Please advise soonest. Many thanks M	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,033,774	: - well perhaps you would like to keep off my Talk page - you really seem to have got it in for me haven't you? Seems strange that you can carry on abusing me about how Wiki works - what if were to say your knowledge of the topics in hand doesn't seem to be proficient? This unfortunately is a great downfall of Wikipedia - content over MOS... ::regarding 's request & in the circumstances I suggest viewing www.museumstjohn.org.uk :::If this block is not overturned I shall know where I stand & will bid you all farewell (sadly but as a matter of principle, why put up with such treatment by three MOS rottweilers and were Admin to look properly into the matter it would be clear who is harassing (& it is not me I can assure you - unless MOS mistakes are regarded as harassment?). Ciao M don't know and on to more substantive	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,040,219	` ::Lol, I didn't say that. I asked about afding the songs from this template, which fail WP:NSONGS. — [ ] `	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
654,043,413	`:(For the benefit of those as baffled as I was by the above, Peter is referring to an email he received from Jimmy in the last day or so. In a comment at Wikipediocracy, Peter says among other things, ``[Jimmy] said that in general, anyone who emails him or the arbcom about a real problem, in the full knowledge that their email would probably be ignored because they are banned or an unperson, was using 'dishonest and manipulative tactics'. That's exactly what he said. I say 'insinuated' because a reasonable inference is that he was referring to me when I emailed him and the Committee in December 2013.`` · · email) ) `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,054,027	Same with the early Neo Contra official page.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
654,056,935	Sir good evening.i want to say something about an article on Wikipedia. Article name Battle of chamkaur sir there are many sources of the battle of chamkaur in which information is different and authentic.The current article had issues i have sources to tell you that the information you had posted is not so correct .please edit it please me i will put forth 4-5 sources for the authenticity of the battle of chamkaur. Thankyou	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,057,719	`Here are the scans from the official manual of the game: :http://i.imgur.com/omsJPjm.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/tXc3J0n.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/2Tr2ySt.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/ON39M6v.jpg Verdy_P's logic essentially amounts to ``If I don't see it, it doesn't exist`` and ``I don't care about a subject, but I am always right.`` `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
654,058,048	Sir the information here is not appropriate.There are issues in this page and some false information in the article.I have 4-5 sources in which the information is same and authentic. Reply me soon i will help you to improve this article.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,058,387	` He and a bunch of his fellow ``volunteers`` are a real self-entitled, arrogant, condescending bunch. It's very reassuring that wikipedia is run by people like this. `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	true
654,064,597	See these Contra games for the exact same use, or lack thereof, of the colon in the title between the actual name and packaging: :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_III:_The_Alien_Wars :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Hard_Corps :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Legacy_of_War :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Shattered_Soldier :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Corps:_Uprising	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
654,064,889	By my reading Ernst suspects future will research will show that the small effect of acupuncture will be due entirely to placebo; Vickers that it won't. I'm not sure where that leaves us on whether or not these fellows disagree about the current state of knowledge.	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
654,066,398	one more source of the battle of chamkaur http://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/other-historical-places/punjab/chamkaur-sahib i want you to edit this Article	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
654,067,480	Someone needs to make the Principal into Dr. KC Sommers.	2,015	false	article	random	test	false
654,068,605	+ sir please check battle of chamkaur article talk page i have put forward many sources of battle of chamkaur by reading it and make corrections to it so that authentic information might reach the readers.Thanks	2,015	true	user	blocked	test	false
654,068,642	` == Attendances == Where do you get the attendances from? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,069,709	Kansas bear sir i know that but they also had not mentioned Mughal victory either .So how could result be Mughal victory.most of the book had neutral result that is Gobind singh escaped with 3 Sikhs (Daya singh,Dharam singh and Maan singh) so That the result should be Gobind Singh escaped with 3 followers instead of Mughal victory.Gobind Singh escaped unhurt.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
654,071,026	Johar, Surinder Singh (1998). Holy Sikh shrines. New Delhi: M D Publications. p. 46. ISBN 978-81-7533-073-3. OCLC 44703461. 3. Singh, Bhagat Lakshman (1995). Short Sketch of the Life and Work of Guru Govind Singh, The Tenth and Last Guru. Laurier Books Ltd. /AES. p. 96. ISBN 978-81-206-0576-3. OCLC 55854929. 4. Singh, Prithi Pal (2007). The History of Sikh Gurus. Lotus Books. p. 146. ISBN 978-81-8382-075-2. 5. Singh, Dalip (1992). Guru Gobind Singh and Khalsa Discipline. Amritsar: Singh Bros. p. 256. ISBN 978-81-7205-071-9. OCLC 28583123	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
654,075,002	:I don't remember all discussion I had in Wikipedia	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,076,927	Sahibe Kamaal Sri Guru Gobind Singh book Battle of chamkaur on page number 117 to 122	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,084,122	`NA}} }} == Article needs rewriting == There are a lot of grammatical errors in this article. It reads as if the person who wrote it is not fluent in English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by `	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
654,127,722	` *The easiest thing to do would be to just be as straightforward and honest about it as possible. Lying and keeping secrets never makes things better. It may be difficult but I assume she's going to have to find out eventually, so you might as well get it over with. She may not respond the way you want, but you should really listen to your mother. Chances are she actually does want and know what is best for you, perhaps even more than you do. Maybe you should stop acting out and try to find a boyfriend who doesn't live in California and who you don't need to keep secret. You don't have to listen to me, but if you don't, I'm sure you'll think back one day and say to yourself, ``wow, Swarm on Wikipedia was right.`` And when that day comes, I want you to imagine me typing out: ``I told you so.`` Good luck! `	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,129,029	Sir excuse me please visit Battle of sarsa and edit its inappropriate content. In a book named Banda Bahadur and Sikh sovereignty page number 77 It was not battle of sarsa it was battle of bachhora sahib The content there is inappropriate because it has been written that Sikhs destroyed while crossing the river but the above source claims that Guru and 42 Sikhs still managed to cross the river so plz edit wherever it is necessary to edit	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,130,453	........................ Thanks for response Shmayo I know he fighting for USA , he raised the assyrian flag because he is assyrian, and also he raised USA flag because he fighting for them, but absolutely his nationality is determined by the place of birth of parents ( even his self born in iran (assyrian/iranian), btw, search in google about persian people ... iran is the modern name of persia, persian people and iranian ppl are the same, it doesn't matter call an iranian, persian or iranian.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
654,131,110	I will wait a little bit more until I add this section in myself as this has been unopposed for some time.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,132,510	It seems that the consensus reached was to mention the 2009 fire because no one contested points. I will add it to the article and surely it will be reverted by someone for some reason.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,135,792	More hrassment from the Jew-hater Whaledad.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
654,138,205	` (UTC) I was just reading this section and realized that there is no reasoning provided by the users on why not to have a controversy section regarding the following two citations. Please let me know if anyone disagrees and why? Encyclopedia of Religion Swaminarayan Movement Ed. Lindsay Jones. Vol. 13. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. p8889-8893. COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning Hanna H. Kim. BAPS activities are not always without controversy, as in its open support of the Sardar Sarovar dam project in Gujarat. For its supporters, the Sardar Sarovar dam and the multi-dam Narmada Valley Development Project of which it is a key component are intended to increase power capacity and provide irrigation, cleaner drinking water, and flood control; for its opponents, the dam is environmentally and socially disastrous and is purchased at the cost of submerging a high percentage of dalit and adivasi villages. The wealthy BAPS organization is criticized by dam opponents for acting to protect its class interests, including those of its land holding members. In response, BAPS followers who are familiar with the Narmada controversy point to the various village relocation and community rehabilitation projects voluntarily instigated and funded by BAPS. Also the Introduction to Swaminarayan Hindusism book states ``Also the Introduction to Swaminarayan Hindusism book states ``The history of the Akshar Purushottam Sanstha has not been with out controversy and division. In AD 1966 Dadubhai Patel and his....`` In addition to BAPS's break from the original Swaminarayan satsaṅg, other schisms have occurred. In 1966 a handful of East African BAPS followers broke away and founded the Yogi Divine Society. Additionally, sādhus from the original movement have left to form their own institutions that sometimes (e.g., Swaminarayan Gurukuls) but not always (e.g., Swaminarayan Gadi) retain an affiliation with their gāddī. Are these citations not enough to warrant a section dedicated to them? 05:56, 30 March 2015`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,142,444	March 2015 You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewbf. Thank you. :If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,154,170	Mam i found this Zafarnamah http://www.zafarnama.com/Download/zafarnama.pdf please read this and edit the result of the battle of chamkaur	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,154,668	I had a third party source of the battle of chamkaur Jacques, Tony. Dictionary of Battles and Sieges. Greenwood Press. p. 221. ISBN 978-0-313-33536-5. it is clearly written Gobind Singh escaped with handful Sikhs. page 221 first battle of chamkaur and second battle of chamkaur	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,157,958	::::::I have not found a satisfactory solution, but trying to ping the user on the talk page is a good start. Assuming that you are referring to the content you added here, per WP:BRD, once your WP:BOLD edit got reverted the burden is on you to connivence others that it's a worthy addition.	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
654,169,361	` :As the template states, you need to post after the template ``a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. ``Please change X`` is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form ``please change X to Y``. I would also note that ``words that praises him alot`` will need citation by reliable sources. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
654,202,881	Introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism also makes	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,208,525	` ::Removed. • `	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
654,215,956	::It's been nearly two months and you still haven't attempted to discuss and still haven't found any sources. Stop reverting.	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,221,697	` :::I have not ``personally attacked other users, specifically calling them ``criminals`` or similar``, whatever that means. This is just vague libel. I have only criticized , specifically for his ``criminal`` editing behaviour. I have no way of telling whether he is as a person a criminal or not, I only know that his arbitrary, whimsical and destructive editing behaviour is beyond the pale. I do not deny his right to edit, but he should do so in good faith and on the basis of knowledge about the subject, and not because it ``seems`` to him that text should be removed, for whatever reason. I have occasionally criticized other editors who attacked me personally, when they did so in violation of wikipedia protocols, I might add. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,233,292	:::YES and no. The kids born within those decades can be put in those respective article lists unless they have their own stand alone article, like Molly.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false
654,238,334	` == Sources to use == Just a list of sources to expand on, this article is very poor on it's references, so lets expand. Rock Sound magazine The bands sound has been compared to the likes of Black Veil Brides, Papa Roach and Shinedown. They often include a Didgeridoo in their music, quotes: ``We actually incorporate it as if it were a second guitar, rather than just a gimmick.`` ``It’s the oldest wind instrument in the world, entirely acoustic, but it dominates your sound.`` The band is from Auckland, New Zealand. *The band moved to Toronto looking for greater opportunities.`	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
654,245,742	` == Marvel's Best competition == Let's be honest, shall we? Dc's ``Man Of Steel`` was a semi-success for DC, seeing as they have tried for years to build a cinematic universe (That cancelled 2008 Justice League film you don't want to think about), but they're trying to build their own universe in a fraction of the time.DCU they're second film in the Batman Vs Superman will see the unification of the Justice League. This is why the general public thinks DC will fail. Marvel has work for years to create a substantial, unique universe,Marvel Cinematic Universe and Dc is throwing one together last minute because they can. That also is why I think (And hope) that Dc will fail. As in, Mordecai, box office bomb worthy fail. Mordecai`	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,264,746	Be cool when someone offends you! Be cool when someone trying to kill you and already generated hills of bodies. Just be cool. Ok? I would leave your community and would advice others not to visit and not to donate anymore to place that tolerate offense of my country. I guess your community will be satisfied that such not cool users won't visit anymore. If I Ukrainian tell you that it's offensive than who else can decide it for? That white people decide stop to call/name African Americans with the word N? Or that was their struggle? A habit is not a truth. It's just a habit. Be up to date please. Thanks!	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,278,038	Who you are to tell anything about some nationalistic nonsense? smells very russian-soviet. don't disclose yourself agent KGB Vanya!	2,015	true	article	blocked	dev	false
654,280,811	:::::::::::::::::::::: both forms are ok because Ukrainian Г (sound) cannot be precisely transliterated to English G. but from the official point of view you are right: Heroyam more accurate.	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
654,280,999	` Why haven't you noticed that Ukraini spelled without ``Y`` Ukrayini? That adds accuracy as well. Another useless day in the life of the wikibureaucracy? `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,283,514	` Hey, thanks for letting me know what had happened. I totally understand and I'm recalling this warning. Happy editing! `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,285,905	:: I would like to make amends for some of those comments. I can see how someone can interpret those words as off putting. Unfortunately, I was frustrated with the blatant conflict of interest and assumed ownership of articles based on the editing patterns on BAPS and related articles. I did warn you on your talk page so maybe reading some of those policies might help. Hopefully we can resolve our issues and you can observe how I expand the article regarding the court proceedings and legal separation while removing the biases. Thanks	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,286,630	I did not edit anything that was at contention. I have asked to help me and asked for clarifications many times. I apologize to you when you left me a warning on my talk page and if that wasn't clear, I will apologize again for the comments that were unnecessary. The edits that I made are not related to the doctrine issue at hand and I waited a few days for the legal part and no one said anything on the talk pages when I literally begged to have that address. Many times you have personally attacked me in your comments and gotten other users involved to reach an unfair consensus. I strongly believe that you have a conflict of interest and you are not disclosing whether you are a member of the group. I was warned not revert anything regarding the discussion taking place on the talk page but I did not make any reverts just edits and then another IP reverted my edits and yours and removed your unsourced statement. Then you reverted all my edits that were not related to the discussion and called on this Admin to block me. How is this an appropriate way to handle things?	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,288,642	Since you are open to being overridden, I guess that Callanecc should run a CU on DanS76 and Zhanzhao, just for more confirmation, we have to confirm that a single person was hopping accounts.	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,292,239	:Okay no problem . A day or two off will help things cool down. I also wanted to apologize to . He was the admin that gave me a true second chance and I don't want to let him down. I have not socked in any way, edited only using valid sources and apologized for personal attacks. I know this is not a permanent block and I hope that it never comes to that again but the length affects the ability to continue to the talk page discussions and work on other articles.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,293,994	::::What I understand so far, is that I should mind my language in wikiland, when making a criticism or complaint. Whatever my personal temper about it might be, it is not helpful to express that here, and I should address the relevant issue in a sober, businesslike manner, following protocols in these things. That is fair enough, assuming that others do likewise, and I fully accept that. I made a mistake in how I expressed my complaint about the editing of , which did not actually help me at all, nor resolve the issue at all. It gets more difficult for me though, when the very people who claim to adhere to protocols, in reality subvert the protocols themselves, and seek to punish me for something else, that I am not guilty of. That promotes more confusion, instead of clearing it up, in my opinion.	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,309,566	Please do not give the impression of bias against non-English sources by your edits.	2,015	false	user	random	dev	false
654,337,043	` ===Review by Andrew=== You don't need to type the title for the ``Introduction.`` It will automatically put the overview at the top of the page. I agree with Shelby, you aren't supposed to reference specific researchers (Shalygin), you could change the sentence to read something like ``this was interpreted as active hotspot volcanism.`` In the Tectonics section, after the citation at the end of the first sentence, you need a space. I would also suggest shrinking the images so they fit above the references. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
654,337,819	== you are a big dickhead == your an asshole it was not me you utter bellend	2,015	false	user	blocked	dev	true
654,351,163	H YOU NEGROS WIKI USERS LIKE AREASEVEN	2,015	false	user	blocked	test	false
654,357,757	== Difference between them and us == Hi Eric, your usually pretty vocal. What are your thoughts on the differences between men and women? I mean, men stand up and go to the toilet and women sit down. Is that why they generally live longer do you thinking?	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
654,359,446	` ::::::: ``no sources`` - apart from history books cited elsewhere (including in the B20 article). And I don't know how to put this again, but I'll say it again regardless: The Guardian edited their article. The original can be found if you know where to look (internet archive, Gale databases, print versions), but it's not the only source by any means. `	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,368,903	` :::And the Canadian act says the federal parliament assents to the Succession to the Crown bill in the UK. The Canadian act doesn't repeal any Canadian law. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
654,369,197	* The article that should exist is photochemical reaction. Propose name change	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
654,376,069	` :::If ``plays professionally`` is, by your own admission, 'silly', why do you insist on having it? Remove that and keep the ``international``. `	2,015	true	article	random	test	false
654,377,770	` ::::::Debatable. But, yeah I agree. Making changes.~ did `	2,015	true	article	random	dev	false
654,404,198	` == Ignore the user Johnuniq == Just ignore the user Johnuniq. He's a hypocritical wikipedia ``volunteer`` who supports whoever is in his circles. It doesn't matter how much you try to convince or explain anything to him. `	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	false
654,410,843	== Contested deletion == This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) A lone cry for democracy and justices requires a public venue!	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,413,065	REDIRECT Talk:Valea Morii River (Pleșcuța)	2,015	true	article	random	train	false
654,413,350	` :@EdJohnston: Done • `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,419,414	I don't propose to change it exclusively to Kyiv. It should be Kyiv(also known Kiev). Check please Mumbai. Absolutely the same situation. One to one. Thus: either Mumbai should become Bombay (also known Mumbai) or Kyiv should be change to Kyiv(also know Kiev). (But it does matter only if you don't put common over logical).	2,015	false	article	blocked	test	false
654,426,857	(well, I meant for scones)	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,428,410	== File:Christian Democratic Party of El Salvador logo.jpg listed for deletion == A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christian Democratic Party of El Salvador logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. •	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,436,759	:::::::: Yes I have got something and that something is sad. By the way mazapuker (I hope this word doesn't offend you and doesn't touch your feelings - it's just a set of letters) what can you say about Mumbai and Bombay? Or consistency is not your choice mazapuker?	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
654,445,938	:::::::::: Where have you seen any personal attacks? You just personally prefer to offend me. What can I do about it? I don't know. And yes I don't want to continue any conversations with ignorant mazapukers. Poor those people who discussed that with you and similar to you. I understand them very well. Are you so unintellegent mazapuker? Have you ever thought if there won't be any problem you would never see me here Ukrainian a citizen of Ukraine and a resident of Kyiv telling you that? Like African American that trying to make someone to stop calling him N. Very sad you are not liberal enough to understand that. It is inevitable but your conservative mind wants to stop it. Everything changes. After your death (if Wikipedia will exist) it for sure will be Kyiv and you won't exist by that time and couldn't change it. Why are you trying to stop things which you cannot change? What kind of perversion is it?	2,015	false	article	blocked	dev	false
654,448,006	:::::::::::: Why are you sitting somewhere very far from that poor city Kyiv and with your good faith mazapukers teach me how my native city should be called in your offensive anglofon world?! Guys and girls you are deeply ignorant. Please stop puking offend me. Why cannot you so clever guys and girls understand that? Just stop. I don't ask you to do something for me. I ask you to stop your offence. You are doing bad thing trying to protect your wrong and bad habits. I said: very long time a lot of people called African Americans N. - it's not true anymore. Why is it so hard to you? Are you all 100 years old and your mind just physically cannot change anymore? Why I had to ask you not to offend me?! Why Mumbai(also known Bombay) but not Bombay(also known Mumbai)?! Do you have mind at all? Your mind is closed to incoming information. Bye. Hope you will go to your ancestors as soon as possible and your habits will go under the ground and you will stop offend me.	2,015	false	article	blocked	train	false
654,449,190	` :::Okay, thanks. I am doing very little editing anymore in wikipedia anyway, except adding some references to articles I wrote on, and few minor changes, and of course reverting a few edits by which simply destroy text, in my opinion (and the opinion of others) for no good reason. My role in wikipedia is very modest indeed compared to who edits all over the place, mainly cutting out text he thinks is wrong. I have not made any ``attacks`` through sockpuppetry in the last days, as alleged, merely corrected a reference error in an article and reverted an edit by . I'll leave it at that - I will not contribute anymore, for now (I have plenty other things to do). I am not exactly sure what specifically the ``behaviour`` is that I am being attacked for, except that I called editing style ``criminal``, ``arbitrary`` and ``biased``. As noted, this wording of mine is not accepted by the wikipedia administrator. `	2,015	true	user	blocked	train	false
654,452,888	:: Can you please block me from such ignorant human being as those? It would be very appreciated. Wikipedia is home for offence and ignorance. I am sad I donated quite a lot money to help ignorance to continue its existence. I thought Wikipeda should have destroyed ignornace. I was wrong.	2,015	false	user	blocked	train	true
654,470,800	== Conflict of interest == Wikipedia has a strong view on editing subjects where you have a close financial interest. Wikipedia is also not to be used for promotional activity. ()	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,485,881	` == Politecnico di studi aziendali legal status == The Federal Administrative Court (TAF) decided that exist in Switzerland - national - basically two forms of recognition for colleges. This is, on the one hand, the recognition of a university as a person entitled to benefits under the Federal Law of 8 October 1999 on support for universities and cooperation in higher education (Law on Assistance to universities, LAU, RS 414.20), on the other accreditation in accordance with Art. 7 para. 1 of the Convention of 14 December 2000 between the Federal Government and University Cantons on cooperation in the university sector (RS 414 205). Both the recognition according to the LAU is accreditation are awarded solely as a result of an examination of the quality (art. 11 cpv.3 letter. at LAU; Art. 7 para. 1 of the Convention of 14 December 2000 between the Confederation and the University Cantons on support for universities and cooperation in higher education). The recognition according to the LAU is aimed at the provision of federal subsidies and is the responsibility of the Federal Council (Art. 12 para. 1 LAU), accreditation, by contrast, is conferred by the Conference Swiss University (art. 7 para. 1 of the Convention of 14 December 2000 between the federal government and University Cantons on cooperation in the university sector) and is a mark of quality, which does not confer on its holder the right to a federal financial aid (see. FF 1999 243, 355), (judgment of TAF of August 13, 2013 B-5924/2012, consid. 2.1, p. 10 et seq.). Accordingly, the mere exercise of a university is not subject to authorization and is based on the freedom of science and economic freedom, as stated in the preamble of the now decayed authorization of the State Council on 14 February 2006. ISSEA sa is then free to confer titles, without that this requires an estimate accreditation or recognition subsidies and must be considered as recognized by national law (judgment of the TAF of 13 August 2013, B-5924/2012, consid. 2.1, p. 11). The CRUS, is not responsible neither for accreditation or for recognition under the LAU and the list developed by this authority can be at most a working tool, not expounding this list legal effects (judgment of the TAF of August 13, 2013 B-5924/2012, consid. 2.1, p. 13Equni (talk) Recognition and university accreditation in Switzerland: rulings clarifying The legal issues on the real value of the recognition and accreditation University in Switzerland have been resolved by some judgments of the Swiss Federal Courts. Recognition in the university system The Federal Court judgment with 5A-376/2008 of 7 May 2008 confirmed that the cantonal license to use the name ``university`` is a recognition of the status of universities in the Swiss university system, and say the opposite is true. That judgment has therefore 'refuted the thesis of the Education Department of the Canton Ticino, in the person of Mr. Sandro Rusconi who mistakenly consider it a simple authorization to use the name University accreditation The Federal Court judgment with 2P.88 / 2006 of 20 January 2009 stated that the accreditation is not mandatory and that to pursue the occupation university in Switzerland do not need a state authorization, as well as the non-accreditation or fails such a procedure does not affect in any way the freedom to engage in teaching and research university. The Federal Court Ammnistrativo with judgment B-1567/2011 of February 8, 2012 has confirmed that the university accreditation is a simple quality mark Optional without any legal consequences. In other words it is a recognition of the validity of this or that title or this or that university from the state. That judgment has therefore 'refuted the thesis of the Federal authorities who mistakenly consider him a state recognition and discriminating between accredited and non-accredited universitiesEquni (talk) University accreditation in Switzerland quality mark 'volunteer without any legal consequences Considerations of the Secretary General of the Conference university Switzerland Excerpt of the considerations of the Secretary General of the Conference university Switzerland Mrs. Martina Weiss in the reply of May 27, 2011 before the Federal Administrative Court in the case relating to our request for accreditation of courses of study. Step 1 of the memory: the purpose and procedure of accreditation It is a voluntary quality mark which does not involve any direct consequences of a legal Step 5 Memory: no violation of the freedom of science art.20 RS The ISSEA can 'freely organize his research and teaching without accreditation. His students may continue to use the services of education, at least at the federal level the lack of accreditation is not tied to any legal consequences. The ISSEA no obligation to organize or otherwise suspend its research and teaching Step 6 Memory: no violation of the freedom of science Article 27 RS Accreditation can not 'be compared with state recognition of a private institution of higher education and related courses of study NB. The CUS Swiss University Conference is the federal body responsible for accrediting university in SwitzerlandEquni (talk) Value of university degrees awarded by private universities in Switzerland In Switzerland, the university education is mostly public and the individual cantons, unless the federal institutes and other federal universities (SUP) UAS directly regulated and controlled by the federal government, however, there is also a significant presenzadi private universities. Switzerland is not required prior authorization and / or state recognition to provide training in settoreuniversitario, organize examinations or issue qualifications. There is the legal value of the securities. Federal or cantonal authorities, within their respective powers, ensure in cases provided by law on the activities of private universities. In Switzerland, except cases specially regulated by law, the judge of the quality and value ofa training is the user or the labor market before the state. In accordance with the tendenzeinternazionali, were introduced in Switzerland accreditation procedures optional (quality certification and / or quality marks) does not discriminate between public offering and private. Accreditation is voluntary and certifies only a external quality assurance and does not imply any recognition of the validity of Questa of that training by the state. The university sector in Switzerland is complex and consequent to the Eurosystem's federal country (A tertiary according classificazioneinternazionale): the federal government regulates and controls the Federal Institutes of Technology and the Universities of Applied Sciences (UAS) pubblicheo private. The cantons, according to the Federal Constitution of Switzerland, have sovereignty over the cantonal public universities and private ones operating in its territorio.In each canton then there are laws that govern the cantonal universities so different matter. The Confederation and the cantons have common skills regarding the coordination and development of quality, through the Swiss University Conference (CUS), joint body of university policy academic public. Nationally a Swiss national accreditation agency (OAQ), optionally accredits public universities and private chloro individual curricula, that gives them a quality mark, which however does not in itself confer any recognition and / or the validity of state titles conferred. An institution may apply for accreditation as a university or can 'take credit for certain courses of study only as required by federal law opening Evening University (LAU, RS 414.20). Regarding the value of the securities issued in Switzerland university academics: for the purposes of the exercise of a regulated profession (eg medicine, advocacy, etc.), are cantonal or federal laws regulating the profession that determine which titolisono recognized. For unregulated professions (eg, management, journalism, etc.) Is up to the fact aldatore work ``recognize`` whether or not the value of a degree; significant may be the accreditation or at least a quality certification issued by private entities generally recognized. For the purpose of further studies, is the university where you will continue its work that recognizes the value of a previous title. As is the case for equivalence of qualifications, universities are based on national standards. Private universities recognized to belong to the teaching system based in Switzerland, although not accredited (ie that did not require quality certification optional), however, have the constitutional right to grant university degrees who, without any difference from those issued by public universities, are valid for: the right of access for the purpose of continuation of studies in the university system (public) in Switzerland and abroad, in accordance with national laws and the Lisbon Convention of 1997, the Council of Europe on the mutual recognition of qualifications; for the exercise of regulated professions in Switzerland under the directive of the European Union CE / 2005/36 into force in Switzerland on 1 November 2011; for the purpose of Switzerland's non-regulated professions, that is the free assessment of the companyEquni (talk) `	2,015	true	user	blocked	dev	false
654,498,558	== Nothing about recombination == It is ridiculous that all focus is dedicated on how animals select a partner that in 100 kb text we cannot even afford a note on why do they do that in the first place. Ok, male expose higher mutation rate and thus expose higher variability: most of the men are defected whereas others are extremely cute. They can spread they genes as hell and best features can be conserved in women, who undergo much less mutation and exist solely to conserve best genes (best trials, aka best men). This was said in the article, albeit not pronounced clearly. Better exposition of this part would shed some light on why do we have men and women in the first place. It would be even better to say something about recombination. Recombination, aka sexual reproduction or crossover is what allows to combine best features from different individuals. It makes evolution much faster than single individual mutation. Just imagine: one guy fortunately acquires one feature, another guy acquires another feature, third guy acquires some another feature. Now, if they cannot recombine and exchange their knowledge, they have to discover everything themselves. On the other hand, “If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” Bernard Shaw explains the recombination principle: The human culture has advanced so rapidly just because you could spread the knowledge for free (I am not talking about climate in Wikipedia). Imagine that you had to discover everything yourself. You would still live in a cave age. So, recombination, sexual reproduction, is extreemly powerful. The flirt affairs sucked around is not as closely crucial. Why cannot we have even a reference to the recombination?	2,015	true	article	blocked	train	false
654,503,222	` == April 2015 == {\| style=``background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #A00; padding:5px;`` \| To edit, please log in.[ Last edited]:Last edited by: (UTC) Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of either form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. \|}`	2,015	true	user	random	train	false
654,506,329	::Dropping a suggestion (or distraction ;-) ). To get sortnumber added from regular value input. See /doc Convert#Time units: Module:convert can read all numberunitseconddisp=number inputs into seconds, and return the plain number-in-seconds only. That plain number to be fed to (=nested in) to produce sortable code. All from a single article-editor number-space-unit input (restrictions might apply). Issue: number-unit separator is space in regular input, but Convert requires a pipe. Too fast or clear enough? -	2,015	true	article	blocked	test	false
654,512,596	Your edit on Von Mieses Yield criterion Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for you first edit here for which you gave as reason that the formula was incorrect. Notice however that the changes you made did not change the formula, since for any two real numbers a and b.	2,015	true	user	random	test	false

653,948,859

YES, that is precisely my point. That editor is using the sidebar genre list and not a prose review for sourcing. That's why I had hoped you'd back me up.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

653,957,145

:::* Thanks for looking up the rose.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

653,962,781

== but ew == He was a fαg which is against nature and is the most disgusting thing. Youre not a woman are you? Sexism is wrong. Being wrong is for women.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

653,963,098

:::: BUT i didnt attack you. Is it A-MORE-SHOUS or A-MORE-TEE-AS

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

653,963,241

== TP == PLZ C MY TORK PAGE

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

653,963,587

:::::::cool. Where did u get it from

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

653,967,204

` == Still unsure what you want, please let me know. == Hello, Regarding edits to Thomas Andrews Drake, John Kiriakou, and Jesselyn Radack For your benefit, I have logged in to prove my existence of having an account. I immediately returned to your talk page to see if there were any instructions for me to improve, or at least an explanation of your enigmatic ``edit war`` message having no other information to support it.... only to find you have deleted everything. Again, if you are the one I am supposedly in a ``war`` with, I have two requests a) please stop deleting relevant information and corrected reference detail which were incomplete and incorrect in prior versions (which you or someone keeps reverting them to). b) if you do not like the complete data nor the corrected references, will you please explain why and how I can improve to meet wikipedia standards? Tis quite odd that corrected detailed facts and references continue to be deleted, and replaced with incomplete detail and incorrect references... am confident wikipedia.org would prefer the former, not the later. If this is wrong, please explain why. If you are deleting corrected facts and corrected references, and continue to refuse to communicate factual reasons for this, I will then need to report your unprofessional actions to your supervisors and colleagues. Please communicate and explain what I possibly have done wrong and need to improve. V/R COL M.D.B., MD`

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

653,981,162

::::::::::Would you mind taking a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bochasanwasi_Shri_Akshar_Purushottam_Swaminarayan_Sanstha#Lead_Section_Neutrality.2C_Length_.26_Court_Proceedings_leading_to_excommunication_of_Shastri when you have a chance. I am interested in your opinion.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

653,982,021

` :Haha, all he did was tick my ``This user page has been vandalized X times`` counter up one, which is technically a meta-vandalism and a correct edit, I guess... :But hey, huge thanks for looking out for me! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

653,982,673

`:A couple of reasons, the first one being your misuse of the word ``anonymously``. :But summed it up pretty well. :> It may not be vandalism, but it is certainly not necessary. Gameplay images should only be included where they are absolutely needed : `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

653,983,729

` == A belated welcome! == ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Moonlightmedicine. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for . Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: * Introduction * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Contributing to Wikipedia * How to edit a page * Help pages * How to write a great article * Editor's index to Wikipedia Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on , consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

653,987,250

, 29 March 2015 (UTC) : Okay thanks 03:44

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

653,993,554

` :I would say it would be better to delete the word ``controversial`` if it offends. I think this idea of Communist opponents of ML is really a construction of this article. I think we should avoid this. `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

654,002,191

Refer for latest comment...

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,008,168

- I don't know why you have waded into the dispute (but I have heeded your advice & attempted to calm things down with , altho he doesn't seem to be a calming down sort of chap. Anyway trust this amply advises you of a change in situation and more than refutes something you attempted to make an allegation about sucking and illiteracy..?? It would be heartening were Wikipedia able to stick to facts & not impose MOS - much look forward to hearing. M Why did you get involved anyway?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,012,196

well I have re instated them and will continue to do so as they seem plainly constructive to me, and will not be dictated to

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,019,231

` == Disambiguation hatnote == Hi , I noticed that you removed the disambiguation hatnotes I'd recently added to both Easy Living (1937 film) and Easy Living (1949 film) with an edit summary explanation of ``-hatnote per WP:NAMB``[which links to section ``Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous``]. Let me share how/why I came to add the hatnotes and perhaps you'll be able to get a sense of why it might be in the best interest of readers to reconsider whether it's applicable to apply WP:NAMB to the instances at hand. I came across a passing mention of a film named ``Easy Living`` in a web article. It intrigued me and caught my interest but did not supply a specific release date. When I searched for ``Easy Living (film)`` it was initially—in practice, in a real life experience—ambiguous to me as a reader which Wikipedia article [``Easy Living (1937 film)`` or ``Easy Living (1949 film)``] would relate to the web article I was attempting to follow up on. So to aid future readers who might find themselves in similar circumstances I added hatnotes cross-referencing the two articles. I considered also adding a link in the hatnotes to the full existing Easy Living disambiguation page but decided such would be 'over-kill', adding length but not substance, as anyone searching just ``Easy Living`` would find themselves led there anyway. The ambiguity being addressed is specifically that which arises from there being two ``Easy Living (____ film)`` articles—so it seemed best to limit it to such. In the interest of better serving the greater Wikipedia readership, may we please restore the hatnotes? Or replace them with some variation to comparably serve the same purpose (i.e. to offer ``the least surprise`` and most ease of use to future readers interested in films named ``Easy Living``)? `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

654,021,339

& for an educated & more informed perspective qv: (altho I think things are so far gone with the MOS gang that only Wiki authorities can set this dispute back onto a proper footing, i.e. relaying the correct info to the public). M

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,023,821

::PS. perhaps you might like to review the processes of how Order of Saint John (chartered 1888) came to be - I am not in league with anyone so couldn't garner support but hopefully in my favour is that I do know my stuff (despite it presently being an uphill struggle to introduce it to Wiki). M

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,024,402

::::PPS. Could you please advise whether these self-styled MOS gurus have free reign to carry on such on incessant, obsessive & and uncivil fashion - I can't see how this works to Wiki's advantage if so?? M

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,025,794

Simple - look at your constant reversions to Rachel Treweek.

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

654,026,334

:::::I know you have & I amazed at the lengths you will go to.... qv: - but none of this solves the basic issue that I am correcting Wiki's info whereas you are trying to impose MOS which distorts the facts (or at least it does when you apply it). Anybody else you want to rally against me!! M

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

654,026,727

:::::::Yes I totally agree with you & I have asked to be put in touch with those who devised MOS because it is deficient/unsatisfactory in relaying the correct info. Well done! Now let's wait for the Administrators to report because they will no doubt the timeline of your (plural) allegations & how pitiful it is to have to keep defending myself like this. I sincerely trust that you & your cohorts will be blocked from touching any of my future edits (or they can block me). There must be a way of resolving this manic pursuit of MOS thereby disrupting considered editing. What a farce... M

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

654,031,660

:I do wish to appeal against this block & I should like you to review carefully the sequence of events. None of this course of events was instigated by me - I have called an Administrator by 'phone (whom I know to explain the situation). :What you have just done would imply guilt on my part (& whilst I don't claim to be perfect) this scenario is categorically none of my making & my messages to their Talk pages were in response to receiving message alerts from them by way of that red light - Mabelina 0 Talk - popping up at the top which I thought should be replied to? This hardly seems reasonable to me but no doubt the protagonists are chuffed to bits (I've already had a message from just to rub it in. The Order of Saint John is the major cause of this ruction - I think will provide you with a balanced view of the matter. Furthermore I guess you will have to decide whether you are with them or me - I have asked for an enquiry into their application of MOS which I trust will be forthcoming. Bottom line is that I add good info to Wiki whereas I am constantly harassed by a gang of about 3/4 people about MOS. Quality info (with incorrect MOS) or MOS at all costs - you decide. Please advise soonest. Many thanks M

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,033,774

: - well perhaps you would like to keep off my Talk page - you really seem to have got it in for me haven't you? Seems strange that you can carry on abusing me about how Wiki works - what if were to say your knowledge of the topics in hand doesn't seem to be proficient? This unfortunately is a great downfall of Wikipedia - content over MOS... ::regarding 's request & in the circumstances I suggest viewing www.museumstjohn.org.uk :::If this block is not overturned I shall know where I stand & will bid you all farewell (sadly but as a matter of principle, why put up with such treatment by three MOS rottweilers and were Admin to look properly into the matter it would be clear who is harassing (& it is not me I can assure you - unless MOS mistakes are regarded as harassment?). Ciao M don't know and on to more substantive

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,040,219

` ::Lol, I didn't say that. I asked about afding the songs from this template, which fail WP:NSONGS. — [ ] `

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

654,043,413

`:(For the benefit of those as baffled as I was by the above, Peter is referring to an email he received from Jimmy in the last day or so. In a comment at Wikipediocracy, Peter says among other things, ``[Jimmy] said that in general, anyone who emails him or the arbcom about a real problem, in the full knowledge that their email would probably be ignored because they are banned or an unperson, was using 'dishonest and manipulative tactics'. That's exactly what he said. I say 'insinuated' because a reasonable inference is that he was referring to me when I emailed him and the Committee in December 2013.`` · · email) ) `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,054,027

Same with the early Neo Contra official page.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

654,056,935

Sir good evening.i want to say something about an article on Wikipedia. Article name Battle of chamkaur sir there are many sources of the battle of chamkaur in which information is different and authentic.The current article had issues i have sources to tell you that the information you had posted is not so correct .please edit it please me i will put forth 4-5 sources for the authenticity of the battle of chamkaur. Thankyou

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,057,719

`Here are the scans from the official manual of the game: :http://i.imgur.com/omsJPjm.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/tXc3J0n.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/2Tr2ySt.jpg :http://i.imgur.com/ON39M6v.jpg Verdy_P's logic essentially amounts to ``If I don't see it, it doesn't exist`` and ``I don't care about a subject, but I am always right.`` `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

654,058,048

Sir the information here is not appropriate.There are issues in this page and some false information in the article.I have 4-5 sources in which the information is same and authentic. Reply me soon i will help you to improve this article.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,058,387

` He and a bunch of his fellow ``volunteers`` are a real self-entitled, arrogant, condescending bunch. It's very reassuring that wikipedia is run by people like this. `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

true

654,064,597

See these Contra games for the exact same use, or lack thereof, of the colon in the title between the actual name and packaging: :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_III:_The_Alien_Wars :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Hard_Corps :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Legacy_of_War :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra:_Shattered_Soldier :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Corps:_Uprising

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

654,064,889

By my reading Ernst suspects future will research will show that the small effect of acupuncture will be due entirely to placebo; Vickers that it won't. I'm not sure where that leaves us on whether or not these fellows disagree about the current state of knowledge.

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

654,066,398

one more source of the battle of chamkaur http://www.thesikhencyclopedia.com/other-historical-places/punjab/chamkaur-sahib i want you to edit this Article

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

654,067,480

Someone needs to make the Principal into Dr. KC Sommers.

2,015

false

article

random

test

false

654,068,605

+ sir please check battle of chamkaur article talk page i have put forward many sources of battle of chamkaur by reading it and make corrections to it so that authentic information might reach the readers.Thanks

2,015

true

user

blocked

test

false

654,068,642

` == Attendances == Where do you get the attendances from? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,069,709

Kansas bear sir i know that but they also had not mentioned Mughal victory either .So how could result be Mughal victory.most of the book had neutral result that is Gobind singh escaped with 3 Sikhs (Daya singh,Dharam singh and Maan singh) so That the result should be Gobind Singh escaped with 3 followers instead of Mughal victory.Gobind Singh escaped unhurt.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

654,071,026

Johar, Surinder Singh (1998). Holy Sikh shrines. New Delhi: M D Publications. p. 46. ISBN 978-81-7533-073-3. OCLC 44703461. 3. Singh, Bhagat Lakshman (1995). Short Sketch of the Life and Work of Guru Govind Singh, The Tenth and Last Guru. Laurier Books Ltd. /AES. p. 96. ISBN 978-81-206-0576-3. OCLC 55854929. 4. Singh, Prithi Pal (2007). The History of Sikh Gurus. Lotus Books. p. 146. ISBN 978-81-8382-075-2. 5. Singh, Dalip (1992). Guru Gobind Singh and Khalsa Discipline. Amritsar: Singh Bros. p. 256. ISBN 978-81-7205-071-9. OCLC 28583123

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

654,075,002

:I don't remember all discussion I had in Wikipedia

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,076,927

Sahibe Kamaal Sri Guru Gobind Singh book Battle of chamkaur on page number 117 to 122

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,084,122

`NA}} }} == Article needs rewriting == There are a lot of grammatical errors in this article. It reads as if the person who wrote it is not fluent in English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by `

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

654,127,722

` *The easiest thing to do would be to just be as straightforward and honest about it as possible. Lying and keeping secrets never makes things better. It may be difficult but I assume she's going to have to find out eventually, so you might as well get it over with. She may not respond the way you want, but you should really listen to your mother. Chances are she actually does want and know what is best for you, perhaps even more than you do. Maybe you should stop acting out and try to find a boyfriend who doesn't live in California and who you don't need to keep secret. You don't have to listen to me, but if you don't, I'm sure you'll think back one day and say to yourself, ``wow, Swarm on Wikipedia was right.`` And when that day comes, I want you to imagine me typing out: ``I told you so.`` Good luck! `

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,129,029

Sir excuse me please visit Battle of sarsa and edit its inappropriate content. In a book named Banda Bahadur and Sikh sovereignty page number 77 It was not battle of sarsa it was battle of bachhora sahib The content there is inappropriate because it has been written that Sikhs destroyed while crossing the river but the above source claims that Guru and 42 Sikhs still managed to cross the river so plz edit wherever it is necessary to edit

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,130,453

........................ Thanks for response Shmayo I know he fighting for USA , he raised the assyrian flag because he is assyrian, and also he raised USA flag because he fighting for them, but absolutely his nationality is determined by the place of birth of parents ( even his self born in iran (assyrian/iranian), btw, search in google about persian people ... iran is the modern name of persia, persian people and iranian ppl are the same, it doesn't matter call an iranian, persian or iranian.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

654,131,110

I will wait a little bit more until I add this section in myself as this has been unopposed for some time.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,132,510

It seems that the consensus reached was to mention the 2009 fire because no one contested points. I will add it to the article and surely it will be reverted by someone for some reason.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,135,792

More hrassment from the Jew-hater Whaledad.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

654,138,205

` (UTC) I was just reading this section and realized that there is no reasoning provided by the users on why not to have a controversy section regarding the following two citations. Please let me know if anyone disagrees and why? Encyclopedia of Religion Swaminarayan Movement Ed. Lindsay Jones. Vol. 13. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. p8889-8893. COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning Hanna H. Kim. BAPS activities are not always without controversy, as in its open support of the Sardar Sarovar dam project in Gujarat. For its supporters, the Sardar Sarovar dam and the multi-dam Narmada Valley Development Project of which it is a key component are intended to increase power capacity and provide irrigation, cleaner drinking water, and flood control; for its opponents, the dam is environmentally and socially disastrous and is purchased at the cost of submerging a high percentage of dalit and adivasi villages. The wealthy BAPS organization is criticized by dam opponents for acting to protect its class interests, including those of its land holding members. In response, BAPS followers who are familiar with the Narmada controversy point to the various village relocation and community rehabilitation projects voluntarily instigated and funded by BAPS. Also the Introduction to Swaminarayan Hindusism book states ``Also the Introduction to Swaminarayan Hindusism book states ``The history of the Akshar Purushottam Sanstha has not been with out controversy and division. In AD 1966 Dadubhai Patel and his....`` In addition to BAPS's break from the original Swaminarayan satsaṅg, other schisms have occurred. In 1966 a handful of East African BAPS followers broke away and founded the Yogi Divine Society. Additionally, sādhus from the original movement have left to form their own institutions that sometimes (e.g., Swaminarayan Gurukuls) but not always (e.g., Swaminarayan Gadi) retain an affiliation with their gāddī. Are these citations not enough to warrant a section dedicated to them? 05:56, 30 March 2015`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,142,444

March 2015 You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewbf. Thank you. :If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,154,170

Mam i found this Zafarnamah http://www.zafarnama.com/Download/zafarnama.pdf please read this and edit the result of the battle of chamkaur

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,154,668

I had a third party source of the battle of chamkaur Jacques, Tony. Dictionary of Battles and Sieges. Greenwood Press. p. 221. ISBN 978-0-313-33536-5. it is clearly written Gobind Singh escaped with handful Sikhs. page 221 first battle of chamkaur and second battle of chamkaur

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,157,958

::::::I have not found a satisfactory solution, but trying to ping the user on the talk page is a good start. Assuming that you are referring to the content you added here, per WP:BRD, once your WP:BOLD edit got reverted the burden is on you to connivence others that it's a worthy addition.

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

654,169,361

` :As the template states, you need to post after the template ``a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. ``Please change X`` is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form ``please change X to Y``. I would also note that ``words that praises him alot`` will need citation by reliable sources. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

654,202,881

Introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism also makes

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,208,525

` ::Removed. • `

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

654,215,956

::It's been nearly two months and you still haven't attempted to discuss and still haven't found any sources. Stop reverting.

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,221,697

` :::I have not ``personally attacked other users, specifically calling them ``criminals`` or similar``, whatever that means. This is just vague libel. I have only criticized , specifically for his ``criminal`` editing behaviour. I have no way of telling whether he is as a person a criminal or not, I only know that his arbitrary, whimsical and destructive editing behaviour is beyond the pale. I do not deny his right to edit, but he should do so in good faith and on the basis of knowledge about the subject, and not because it ``seems`` to him that text should be removed, for whatever reason. I have occasionally criticized other editors who attacked me personally, when they did so in violation of wikipedia protocols, I might add. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,233,292

:::YES and no. The kids born within those decades can be put in those respective article lists unless they have their own stand alone article, like Molly.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false

654,238,334

` == Sources to use == Just a list of sources to expand on, this article is very poor on it's references, so lets expand. *Rock Sound magazine **The bands sound has been compared to the likes of Black Veil Brides, Papa Roach and Shinedown. **They often include a Didgeridoo in their music, quotes: ***``We actually incorporate it as if it were a second guitar, rather than just a gimmick.`` ***``It’s the oldest wind instrument in the world, entirely acoustic, but it dominates your sound.`` *The band is from Auckland, New Zealand. *The band moved to Toronto looking for greater opportunities.`

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

654,245,742

` == Marvel's Best competition == Let's be honest, shall we? Dc's ``Man Of Steel`` was a semi-success for DC, seeing as they have tried for years to build a cinematic universe (That cancelled 2008 Justice League film you don't want to think about), but they're trying to build their own universe in a fraction of the time.DCU they're second film in the Batman Vs Superman will see the unification of the Justice League. This is why the general public thinks DC will fail. Marvel has work for years to create a substantial, unique universe,Marvel Cinematic Universe and Dc is throwing one together last minute because they can. That also is why I think (And hope) that Dc will fail. As in, Mordecai, box office bomb worthy fail. Mordecai`

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,264,746

Be cool when someone offends you! Be cool when someone trying to kill you and already generated hills of bodies. Just be cool. Ok? I would leave your community and would advice others not to visit and not to donate anymore to place that tolerate offense of my country. I guess your community will be satisfied that such not cool users won't visit anymore. If I Ukrainian tell you that it's offensive than who else can decide it for? That white people decide stop to call/name African Americans with the word N? Or that was their struggle? A habit is not a truth. It's just a habit. Be up to date please. Thanks!

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,278,038

Who you are to tell anything about some nationalistic nonsense? smells very russian-soviet. don't disclose yourself agent KGB Vanya!

2,015

true

article

blocked

dev

false

654,280,811

:::::::::::::::::::::: both forms are ok because Ukrainian Г (sound) cannot be precisely transliterated to English G. but from the official point of view you are right: Heroyam more accurate.

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

654,280,999

` Why haven't you noticed that Ukraini spelled without ``Y`` Ukrayini? That adds accuracy as well. Another useless day in the life of the wikibureaucracy? `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,283,514

` Hey, thanks for letting me know what had happened. I totally understand and I'm recalling this warning. Happy editing! `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,285,905

:: I would like to make amends for some of those comments. I can see how someone can interpret those words as off putting. Unfortunately, I was frustrated with the blatant conflict of interest and assumed ownership of articles based on the editing patterns on BAPS and related articles. I did warn you on your talk page so maybe reading some of those policies might help. Hopefully we can resolve our issues and you can observe how I expand the article regarding the court proceedings and legal separation while removing the biases. Thanks

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,286,630

I did not edit anything that was at contention. I have asked to help me and asked for clarifications many times. I apologize to you when you left me a warning on my talk page and if that wasn't clear, I will apologize again for the comments that were unnecessary. The edits that I made are not related to the doctrine issue at hand and I waited a few days for the legal part and no one said anything on the talk pages when I literally begged to have that address. Many times you have personally attacked me in your comments and gotten other users involved to reach an unfair consensus. I strongly believe that you have a conflict of interest and you are not disclosing whether you are a member of the group. I was warned not revert anything regarding the discussion taking place on the talk page but I did not make any reverts just edits and then another IP reverted my edits and yours and removed your unsourced statement. Then you reverted all my edits that were not related to the discussion and called on this Admin to block me. How is this an appropriate way to handle things?

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,288,642

Since you are open to being overridden, I guess that Callanecc should run a CU on DanS76 and Zhanzhao, just for more confirmation, we have to confirm that a single person was hopping accounts.

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,292,239

:Okay no problem . A day or two off will help things cool down. I also wanted to apologize to . He was the admin that gave me a true second chance and I don't want to let him down. I have not socked in any way, edited only using valid sources and apologized for personal attacks. I know this is not a permanent block and I hope that it never comes to that again but the length affects the ability to continue to the talk page discussions and work on other articles.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,293,994

::::What I understand so far, is that I should mind my language in wikiland, when making a criticism or complaint. Whatever my personal temper about it might be, it is not helpful to express that here, and I should address the relevant issue in a sober, businesslike manner, following protocols in these things. That is fair enough, assuming that others do likewise, and I fully accept that. I made a mistake in how I expressed my complaint about the editing of , which did not actually help me at all, nor resolve the issue at all. It gets more difficult for me though, when the very people who claim to adhere to protocols, in reality subvert the protocols themselves, and seek to punish me for something else, that I am not guilty of. That promotes more confusion, instead of clearing it up, in my opinion.

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,309,566

Please do not give the impression of bias against non-English sources by your edits.

2,015

false

user

random

dev

false

654,337,043

` ===Review by Andrew=== You don't need to type the title for the ``Introduction.`` It will automatically put the overview at the top of the page. I agree with Shelby, you aren't supposed to reference specific researchers (Shalygin), you could change the sentence to read something like ``this was interpreted as active hotspot volcanism.`` In the Tectonics section, after the citation at the end of the first sentence, you need a space. I would also suggest shrinking the images so they fit above the references. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

654,337,819

== you are a big dickhead == your an asshole it was not me you utter bellend

2,015

false

user

blocked

dev

true

654,351,163

H YOU NEGROS WIKI USERS LIKE AREASEVEN

2,015

false

user

blocked

test

false

654,357,757

== Difference between them and us == Hi Eric, your usually pretty vocal. What are your thoughts on the differences between men and women? I mean, men stand up and go to the toilet and women sit down. Is that why they generally live longer do you thinking?

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

654,359,446

` ::::::: ``no sources`` - apart from history books cited elsewhere (including in the B20 article). And I don't know how to put this again, but I'll say it again regardless: The Guardian edited their article. The original can be found if you know where to look (internet archive, Gale databases, print versions), but it's not the only source by any means. `

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,368,903

` :::And the Canadian act says the federal parliament assents to the Succession to the Crown bill in the UK. The Canadian act doesn't repeal any Canadian law. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

654,369,197

* The article that should exist is photochemical reaction. Propose name change

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

654,376,069

` :::If ``plays professionally`` is, by your own admission, 'silly', why do you insist on having it? Remove that and keep the ``international``. `

2,015

true

article

random

test

false

654,377,770

` ::::::Debatable. But, yeah I agree. Making changes.~ did `

2,015

true

article

random

dev

false

654,404,198

` == Ignore the user Johnuniq == Just ignore the user Johnuniq. He's a hypocritical wikipedia ``volunteer`` who supports whoever is in his circles. It doesn't matter how much you try to convince or explain anything to him. `

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

false

654,410,843

== Contested deletion == This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) A lone cry for democracy and justices requires a public venue!

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,413,065

REDIRECT Talk:Valea Morii River (Pleșcuța)

2,015

true

article

random

train

false

654,413,350

` :@EdJohnston: Done • `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,419,414

I don't propose to change it exclusively to Kyiv. It should be Kyiv(also known Kiev). Check please Mumbai. Absolutely the same situation. One to one. Thus: either Mumbai should become Bombay (also known Mumbai) or Kyiv should be change to Kyiv(also know Kiev). (But it does matter only if you don't put common over logical).

2,015

false

article

blocked

test

false

654,426,857

(well, I meant for scones)

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,428,410

== File:Christian Democratic Party of El Salvador logo.jpg listed for deletion == A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christian Democratic Party of El Salvador logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. •

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,436,759

:::::::: Yes I have got something and that something is sad. By the way mazapuker (I hope this word doesn't offend you and doesn't touch your feelings - it's just a set of letters) what can you say about Mumbai and Bombay? Or consistency is not your choice mazapuker?

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

654,445,938

:::::::::: Where have you seen any personal attacks? You just personally prefer to offend me. What can I do about it? I don't know. And yes I don't want to continue any conversations with ignorant mazapukers. Poor those people who discussed that with you and similar to you. I understand them very well. Are you so unintellegent mazapuker? Have you ever thought if there won't be any problem you would never see me here Ukrainian a citizen of Ukraine and a resident of Kyiv telling you that? Like African American that trying to make someone to stop calling him N. Very sad you are not liberal enough to understand that. It is inevitable but your conservative mind wants to stop it. Everything changes. After your death (if Wikipedia will exist) it for sure will be Kyiv and you won't exist by that time and couldn't change it. Why are you trying to stop things which you cannot change? What kind of perversion is it?

2,015

false

article

blocked

dev

false

654,448,006

:::::::::::: Why are you sitting somewhere very far from that poor city Kyiv and with your good faith mazapukers teach me how my native city should be called in your offensive anglofon world?! Guys and girls you are deeply ignorant. Please stop puking offend me. Why cannot you so clever guys and girls understand that? Just stop. I don't ask you to do something for me. I ask you to stop your offence. You are doing bad thing trying to protect your wrong and bad habits. I said: very long time a lot of people called African Americans N. - it's not true anymore. Why is it so hard to you? Are you all 100 years old and your mind just physically cannot change anymore? Why I had to ask you not to offend me?! Why Mumbai(also known Bombay) but not Bombay(also known Mumbai)?! Do you have mind at all? Your mind is closed to incoming information. Bye. Hope you will go to your ancestors as soon as possible and your habits will go under the ground and you will stop offend me.

2,015

false

article

blocked

train

false

654,449,190

` :::Okay, thanks. I am doing very little editing anymore in wikipedia anyway, except adding some references to articles I wrote on, and few minor changes, and of course reverting a few edits by which simply destroy text, in my opinion (and the opinion of others) for no good reason. My role in wikipedia is very modest indeed compared to who edits all over the place, mainly cutting out text he thinks is wrong. I have not made any ``attacks`` through sockpuppetry in the last days, as alleged, merely corrected a reference error in an article and reverted an edit by . I'll leave it at that - I will not contribute anymore, for now (I have plenty other things to do). I am not exactly sure what specifically the ``behaviour`` is that I am being attacked for, except that I called editing style ``criminal``, ``arbitrary`` and ``biased``. As noted, this wording of mine is not accepted by the wikipedia administrator. `

2,015

true

user

blocked

train

false

654,452,888

:: Can you please block me from such ignorant human being as those? It would be very appreciated. Wikipedia is home for offence and ignorance. I am sad I donated quite a lot money to help ignorance to continue its existence. I thought Wikipeda should have destroyed ignornace. I was wrong.

2,015

false

user

blocked

train

true

654,470,800

== Conflict of interest == Wikipedia has a strong view on editing subjects where you have a close financial interest. Wikipedia is also not to be used for promotional activity. ()

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,485,881

` == Politecnico di studi aziendali legal status == The Federal Administrative Court (TAF) decided that exist in Switzerland - national - basically two forms of recognition for colleges. This is, on the one hand, the recognition of a university as a person entitled to benefits under the Federal Law of 8 October 1999 on support for universities and cooperation in higher education (Law on Assistance to universities, LAU, RS 414.20), on the other accreditation in accordance with Art. 7 para. 1 of the Convention of 14 December 2000 between the Federal Government and University Cantons on cooperation in the university sector (RS 414 205). Both the recognition according to the LAU is accreditation are awarded solely as a result of an examination of the quality (art. 11 cpv.3 letter. at LAU; Art. 7 para. 1 of the Convention of 14 December 2000 between the Confederation and the University Cantons on support for universities and cooperation in higher education). The recognition according to the LAU is aimed at the provision of federal subsidies and is the responsibility of the Federal Council (Art. 12 para. 1 LAU), accreditation, by contrast, is conferred by the Conference Swiss University (art. 7 para. 1 of the Convention of 14 December 2000 between the federal government and University Cantons on cooperation in the university sector) and is a mark of quality, which does not confer on its holder the right to a federal financial aid (see. FF 1999 243, 355), (judgment of TAF of August 13, 2013 B-5924/2012, consid. 2.1, p. 10 et seq.). Accordingly, the mere exercise of a university is not subject to authorization and is based on the freedom of science and economic freedom, as stated in the preamble of the now decayed authorization of the State Council on 14 February 2006. ISSEA sa is then free to confer titles, without that this requires an estimate accreditation or recognition subsidies and must be considered as recognized by national law (judgment of the TAF of 13 August 2013, B-5924/2012, consid. 2.1, p. 11). The CRUS, is not responsible neither for accreditation or for recognition under the LAU and the list developed by this authority can be at most a working tool, not expounding this list legal effects (judgment of the TAF of August 13, 2013 B-5924/2012, consid. 2.1, p. 13Equni (talk) Recognition and university accreditation in Switzerland: rulings clarifying The legal issues on the real value of the recognition and accreditation University in Switzerland have been resolved by some judgments of the Swiss Federal Courts. Recognition in the university system The Federal Court judgment with 5A-376/2008 of 7 May 2008 confirmed that the cantonal license to use the name ``university`` is a recognition of the status of universities in the Swiss university system, and say the opposite is true. That judgment has therefore 'refuted the thesis of the Education Department of the Canton Ticino, in the person of Mr. Sandro Rusconi who mistakenly consider it a simple authorization to use the name University accreditation The Federal Court judgment with 2P.88 / 2006 of 20 January 2009 stated that the accreditation is not mandatory and that to pursue the occupation university in Switzerland do not need a state authorization, as well as the non-accreditation or fails such a procedure does not affect in any way the freedom to engage in teaching and research university. The Federal Court Ammnistrativo with judgment B-1567/2011 of February 8, 2012 has confirmed that the university accreditation is a simple quality mark Optional without any legal consequences. In other words it is a recognition of the validity of this or that title or this or that university from the state. That judgment has therefore 'refuted the thesis of the Federal authorities who mistakenly consider him a state recognition and discriminating between accredited and non-accredited universitiesEquni (talk) University accreditation in Switzerland quality mark 'volunteer without any legal consequences Considerations of the Secretary General of the Conference university Switzerland Excerpt of the considerations of the Secretary General of the Conference university Switzerland Mrs. Martina Weiss in the reply of May 27, 2011 before the Federal Administrative Court in the case relating to our request for accreditation of courses of study. Step 1 of the memory: the purpose and procedure of accreditation It is a voluntary quality mark which does not involve any direct consequences of a legal Step 5 Memory: no violation of the freedom of science art.20 RS The ISSEA can 'freely organize his research and teaching without accreditation. His students may continue to use the services of education, at least at the federal level the lack of accreditation is not tied to any legal consequences. The ISSEA no obligation to organize or otherwise suspend its research and teaching Step 6 Memory: no violation of the freedom of science Article 27 RS Accreditation can not 'be compared with state recognition of a private institution of higher education and related courses of study NB. The CUS Swiss University Conference is the federal body responsible for accrediting university in SwitzerlandEquni (talk) Value of university degrees awarded by private universities in Switzerland In Switzerland, the university education is mostly public and the individual cantons, unless the federal institutes and other federal universities (SUP) UAS directly regulated and controlled by the federal government, however, there is also a significant presenzadi private universities. Switzerland is not required prior authorization and / or state recognition to provide training in settoreuniversitario, organize examinations or issue qualifications. There is the legal value of the securities. Federal or cantonal authorities, within their respective powers, ensure in cases provided by law on the activities of private universities. In Switzerland, except cases specially regulated by law, the judge of the quality and value ofa training is the user or the labor market before the state. In accordance with the tendenzeinternazionali, were introduced in Switzerland accreditation procedures optional (quality certification and / or quality marks) does not discriminate between public offering and private. Accreditation is voluntary and certifies only a external quality assurance and does not imply any recognition of the validity of Questa of that training by the state. The university sector in Switzerland is complex and consequent to the Eurosystem's federal country (A tertiary according classificazioneinternazionale): the federal government regulates and controls the Federal Institutes of Technology and the Universities of Applied Sciences (UAS) pubblicheo private. The cantons, according to the Federal Constitution of Switzerland, have sovereignty over the cantonal public universities and private ones operating in its territorio.In each canton then there are laws that govern the cantonal universities so different matter. The Confederation and the cantons have common skills regarding the coordination and development of quality, through the Swiss University Conference (CUS), joint body of university policy academic public. Nationally a Swiss national accreditation agency (OAQ), optionally accredits public universities and private chloro individual curricula, that gives them a quality mark, which however does not in itself confer any recognition and / or the validity of state titles conferred. An institution may apply for accreditation as a university or can 'take credit for certain courses of study only as required by federal law opening Evening University (LAU, RS 414.20). Regarding the value of the securities issued in Switzerland university academics: for the purposes of the exercise of a regulated profession (eg medicine, advocacy, etc.), are cantonal or federal laws regulating the profession that determine which titolisono recognized. For unregulated professions (eg, management, journalism, etc.) Is up to the fact aldatore work ``recognize`` whether or not the value of a degree; significant may be the accreditation or at least a quality certification issued by private entities generally recognized. For the purpose of further studies, is the university where you will continue its work that recognizes the value of a previous title. As is the case for equivalence of qualifications, universities are based on national standards. Private universities recognized to belong to the teaching system based in Switzerland, although not accredited (ie that did not require quality certification optional), however, have the constitutional right to grant university degrees who, without any difference from those issued by public universities, are valid for: the right of access for the purpose of continuation of studies in the university system (public) in Switzerland and abroad, in accordance with national laws and the Lisbon Convention of 1997, the Council of Europe on the mutual recognition of qualifications; for the exercise of regulated professions in Switzerland under the directive of the European Union CE / 2005/36 into force in Switzerland on 1 November 2011; for the purpose of Switzerland's non-regulated professions, that is the free assessment of the companyEquni (talk) `

2,015

true

user

blocked

dev

false

654,498,558

== Nothing about recombination == It is ridiculous that all focus is dedicated on how animals select a partner that in 100 kb text we cannot even afford a note on why do they do that in the first place. Ok, male expose higher mutation rate and thus expose higher variability: most of the men are defected whereas others are extremely cute. They can spread they genes as hell and best features can be conserved in women, who undergo much less mutation and exist solely to conserve best genes (best trials, aka best men). This was said in the article, albeit not pronounced clearly. Better exposition of this part would shed some light on why do we have men and women in the first place. It would be even better to say something about recombination. Recombination, aka sexual reproduction or crossover is what allows to combine best features from different individuals. It makes evolution much faster than single individual mutation. Just imagine: one guy fortunately acquires one feature, another guy acquires another feature, third guy acquires some another feature. Now, if they cannot recombine and exchange their knowledge, they have to discover everything themselves. On the other hand, “If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” Bernard Shaw explains the recombination principle: The human culture has advanced so rapidly just because you could spread the knowledge for free (I am not talking about climate in Wikipedia). Imagine that you had to discover everything yourself. You would still live in a cave age. So, recombination, sexual reproduction, is extreemly powerful. The flirt affairs sucked around is not as closely crucial. Why cannot we have even a reference to the recombination?

2,015

true

article

blocked

train

false

654,503,222

` == April 2015 == {| style=``background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #A00; padding:5px;`` | To edit, please log in.[ Last edited]:Last edited by: (UTC) Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of either form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. |}`

2,015

true

user

random

train

false

654,506,329

::Dropping a suggestion (or distraction ;-) ). To get sortnumber added from regular value input. See /doc Convert#Time units: Module:convert can read all numberunitseconddisp=number inputs into seconds, and return the plain number-in-seconds only. That plain number to be fed to (=nested in) to produce sortable code. All from a single article-editor number-space-unit input (restrictions might apply). Issue: number-unit separator is space in regular input, but Convert requires a pipe. Too fast or clear enough? -

2,015

true

article

blocked

test

false

654,512,596

Your edit on Von Mieses Yield criterion Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for you first edit here for which you gave as reason that the formula was incorrect. Notice however that the changes you made did not change the formula, since for any two real numbers a and b.

2,015

true

user

random

test

false