rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
61,991,542
:::::I guess the truth hurts...
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
61,991,796
== ugly cat == That is one ugly cat, El_C! Concerning , you might learn to spell. You say you are part Indian but in reality you are a disgrace to the people who have been here a lot longer then you. You have no respect for the Great Spirit. You have no respect for living things. You have no respect for the people you call your own. And they have no respect for you. Why don't you come out and tell the people here that you are a cop? Also, no self-respecting Indian would be a people hating commie, Comrade!
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
true
61,992,202
==home of the cop== That is one ugly cat, El_C! Concerning , you might learn to spell. You say you are part Indian but in reality you are a disgrace to the people who have been here a lot longer then you. You have no respect for the Great Spirit. You have no respect for living things. You have no respect for the people you call your own. And they have no respect for you. Why don't you come out and tell the people here that you are a cop? Also, no self-respecting Indian would be a people hating commie, Comrade!
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
61,992,462
== your comment to me == Actually, that was pretty civil. I mean that sincerely and thank you.
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
false
61,993,915
== home of the cop == That is one ugly cat, El_C! Concerning , you might learn to spell. You say you are part Indian but in reality you are a disgrace to the people who have been here a lot longer then you. You have no respect for the Great Spirit. You have no respect for living things. You have no respect for the people you call your own. And they have no respect for you. Why don't you come out and tell the people here that you are a cop? Also, no self-respecting Indian would be a people hating commie, Comrade!
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
61,996,369
:::Falun Gong is not a religion, it is a cult responsible for the deaths of thousands.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
61,998,404
:::::::No, in this case I am happy enough to be completely disinterested. Or - better - I wish the best to both people, Serbian and Croatian, not only because I wish it to all other nations, but also because I feel them both as sister nations to my own Czech people. :::::::And therefore I think that we all need openess, acceptance of our past including the errors and guilts, and the will to make things better. Look at Germans and French: they have a similar history of war and hate, and now they are friends. So I hope that this will be the case also with Serbia and Croatia one day. The small step we can do here in Wikipedia towards this goal is that we will try to write as unpartial and informed articles as possible, I think. :::::::Have a nice day,
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,002,482
Two Boys BUmming oohhhh
2,006
false
article
blocked
dev
false
62,038,857
` == once again - vandalism (stop deleting ``Declaration of Facts``) == once again I am asking for explanations before changing the article! I changed it back and so I will do untill there will be a clear explanation for deleting the part on ``declaration of facts``. this is vandalism. please enough! stop deleting from the article without explanations!`
2,006
false
article
random
dev
false
62,039,103
some guy is deleting my work.putting his own. It is rather annoying, and he seems to be ignoring me. I do not want to be accused of vandalism but can some warn him about deleting other peoples work without asking
2,006
true
article
blocked
test
false
62,042,856
` Going back to the article content in question , yes, it may be senstive, but even the text indicates confusion over ``sensititive to what?`` The fact that math majors score higher on the AQ quotient doesn't mean it's AS that is being measured. (Math major undergraduate here, with no AS qualities whatsoever. Maybe it's measuring mathmatical abilities -) It's not clear just what the quotient is sensitive to, at least to the uninitiated reader like myself. My concern is that the text added left implications that go beyond what is known about this AQ number. What do highly respected groups like the Yale Child Study Center have to say about the AS Quotient? Do they use it? `
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,042,900
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Your article on Caitlin ransom has been deleted as it appears that the subject is not notable. Please have a look at WIkipedia:Biography for guidelines on who deserves an article.
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,046,082
` :Sorry, no? ``No`` is what a master says to a dog. ``No`` is what a parent says to a child. Clearly you have this illusion that you're somehow more important than I am on wikipedia, that you are a boss of mine. Since this illusion is likely the only thing keeping you from ending your sorry life, I will not end it for you. I *am* your subordinate, and hopefully that makes up for your small penis. Sorry, no? Yes, master, anything you say. You have power over me. I must repent! `
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
true
62,048,108
We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender. Neither will i until these two great pages are merged as one The one and only
2,006
true
article
blocked
test
false
62,048,748
I find your page racially insulting. It offends me when you state that you support the Indian Cricket team therefor i am reporting you to administrators and Harbhjan Singh
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,055,037
` == Sayfol == If the pov of Sayfol is not neutral, I apologise, but this is the only pov anyone has of it. No other information is available, from any other source except eyewitnesses. 02:07, 3 July 2006 == Changes to VNN article == I changed the article because the current article stated nothing at all about the website but instead simply bashed its creator. Whether accurate or inaccurate, it should have been posted to an article titled ``Alex Linder``. Although that's a clear violation of Wiki's rules, it was my brief article that is considered ``vandalism``. I admit I should have put more thought into it and constructed it better, but it is still a vast improvement on the article it replaced. Mark Richards :Thank you for your comments. However, when I first reverted the edits by to Vanguard News Network, I placed a Neutral Point of View notice on 's page, not a vandalism warning. Please understand that this version of the article is inconsistent with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. It contains many statements that are not neutral because they take opinions promoted by Vanguard News Network, and phrase them as facts. When writing Wikipedia articles, one needs to be careful to attribute opinions to those that hold them. For example, instead of saying that ``Vanguard News Network is trying to inform people of Y`` which assumes the existence of Y and that convincing people of Y's existence is ``informing`` them , it might be more appropriate to state that ``Vanguard News Network claims that it is trying to inform people of its belief in the existence of Y`` or perhaps ``Vanguard News Network promotes its claims about the existence of Y``. :After I first reverted the edit by , instead of discussing this issue or rewriting the edit to conform to the Neutral Point of View policy, simply reinserted the disputed edit into the article. I treated this as vandalism because, according to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit, in the case of Neutral Point of View policy violations, ``If the user persists in reverting to his preferred version of the article, however, that may be considered vandalism.`` Furthermore, the subsequent use of various IP addresses to repeatedly reinsert the same edit tended to convey an impression of bad faith. Please see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Making all of your contributions under the same named user account, and discussing issues such as my Neutral Point of View notice rather than simply reverting the disputed edits might tend to avoid conflicts with other Wikipedia editors. If you wish to re-write your edit in scrupulous accordance with the Wikipedia Neutral Point of View policy, using your named user account, you may do so. However, this this version of the article is clearly inconsistent with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and it cannot remain in its current form. :Additionally, your version of the article gives excessive prominence to the views of Vanguard News Network, and does not treat the views of its opponents. It is essential to the Neutral Point of View policy that both sides of the issue should be presented. Well, John254, I am disappointed, but not really surprised. Mostly I am disapppointed at Wikipedia itself, for allowing its so-called watchdogs to ignore the specific things they're watching for as long as they support their own personal opinion. You notice that I no longer replace the VNN article. At first I considered re-writing it after conforming to Wikipedia's rules, but what's the use? You are determined to allow only your personally fiction on the site, so I have no reason to believe you would tolerate any truthful article. This whole thing started because the article that you continually re-post is so bad. If you were an honest man, and truly cared about the integrity of Wikipedia, you would replace it. Not with my article, mind you; I'm not suggesting that. But with something that fits the guidelines that you supposedly care so much about. Mark`
2,006
true
user
random
test
false
62,063,679
SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK ME SUCK M
2,006
false
user
blocked
dev
true
62,072,178
::I'm an official tester so let me explain a bit. The preliminary release schedule for Windows Vista is that there are two betas follows with release candidate (RC) builds. Decision would be made in the development team to see which build/feature sets will be ready for the beta 2 build. Development still continues even the build has been decided, so the code will fork (or branch) for beta 2 release. When build 538x is in escrow for beta 2 release, the build number for the main tree is bumped up to 54xx and being considered as a post-beta 2 and pre-RC1 builds. The build number is just cosmetic so the beta 2 label persists even it is pre-RC1.
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,074,404
*They could just shoot them 13 times in a row, or disintegration would probably work too
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
62,084,301
` ==My RFA== {| class=``messagebox`` style=``background:#f0e68c; height:75px; width:75%`` cellpadding=``6`` | |Thank you for your vote in my RFA, which succeeded with a final tally of 66-0-4. If there's anything I can help you with now that I'm an admin, please let me know on my talk page. Again, thanks! |}`
2,006
true
user
random
dev
false
62,090,035
Thank you for experimenting with the page Charles Taze Russell on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,090,626
No. Not at all. I'm trying to show people the truth, be it politically incorrect or not. Yours,
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
62,090,881
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,099,306
conforms to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and has
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
62,101,085
*It was also from a very early episode of Star Trek, but I could have sworn they stole it from a much earlier twilight zone episode
2,006
false
article
blocked
train
false
62,106,866
::Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,114,594
:::WGee, can you doublecheck something in the Economic Policy section. One place refers to Energy and Petroleum (Ministry)?, but later in the same section, it say Energy Ministry. Not sure if Chavez has changed the names, but you added the and Petroleum?
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,116,481
::Also, I just realized that for some of the Virginia city articles, the titles are correct. Virginia is a weird exception in that nearly all its small towns do not incorporate because they would then become independent cities and would exit county jurisdiction (which implies they would have to take over all county responsibilities). Virginia has a strange law where a county cannot share concurrent jurisdiction with a city. So that takes care of another group.
2,006
true
article
random
test
false
62,118,800
==kindness== Wow, your compassion sure disappered fast didn't it? Like I said, you have no spirit. If you don't have the spirit of an Indian then you may as well be any phony white boy or girl of European ancestry. Stop hiding behind the Indian thing and just be honest. I think Wikipedians have the right to know that you're a cop. Q. And besides, what Indian sister would be a cop for the white boys? A. A traitor.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
62,122,573
==Love for Cyde== Some love for you.
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
62,123,337
== Your edits to Shockwave (roller coaster) == Please stop being a jackass, it really ruins it for all us non-vandal AOL users
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
62,125,264
There are many broken nostrils in this pancreas
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
62,126,463
I am a very efficient person, who can steer the ape
2,006
false
user
blocked
test
false
62,127,163
no i am just put things into google translate make words come out random order back fowards
2,006
false
user
blocked
dev
false
62,137,516
Please do not re-create pages that have been deleted by an administrator. Doing so is considered vandalism and can lead to a block. Thanks.
2,006
true
user
random
dev
false
62,138,388
`Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. o `
2,006
true
user
random
dev
false
62,140,861
2006 (UTC) Now is says that Bristol, Wyoming is a city. There is no Bristol, Wyoming! Can someone fix it?? 06:13, 5 July
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
62,143,866
== Ram Kumar AFD == Hi, I too was not very conversant with the relisting but it is quite simple. You just need to comment out the Afd from its original date listing log - e.g. and transclude it to the latest date (July 5 in this example)log. Additionally, you'd need to add the to the AFD page of the article. After having a look at Deathphoenix's contribs, I believe he has, by oversight, not added it to the then current date log, 30th June. I've also moved it to the top of Deletion sorting India list.
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,150,867
` ==Westside== You recently deleted my article on Westside, because it was not ``verifiable``. You said that I needed to have Westside reviewed by newspapers, or something along those lines. My problem with this is that it is not a, um, well known publication, and as such would not likely be reviewed by any newspapers or such. Is there anything I can do (or in other words, what kind of external sources do I need?) to get my article back on Wikipedia? How can I get somebody that you define as reliable to verify that Westside, umm, exists? It just doesn't seem fair that I can't write an article about Westside just because the New York Times doesn't write about it. I thought the purpose of Wikipedia was to make information available to anyone who wants it. Several of Westside's readers have approached Wyatt (the co-creator) about a website to learn more about it, and, as of yet, he has no website to point them to. When he asked me to create a site about it (he's not great with these things) I of course immediately thought ``What better than Wikipedia?`` Unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the difficulty of putting a simple article up on Wikipedia. I won't deny that this has made me very angry. Is there ANY way for me to get my article back up? There's pretty much no chance that anything like a newspaper will cite Westside. Is there some kind of other source that I can get to review Westside? Also, why was my article initially cited as an attack article? It seemed obvious to me that my description of Tucker and Jason were not in any way insulting, as their apparent lack of intelligence is a character trait. Thanks in advance for your response.`
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
62,153,906
` EDIT: Damn, I just lost everything I typed. Basically, 1: Not trying to promote Westside 2: Westside is not my comic. ``When he asked me to create a site about it (he's not great with these things) I of course immediately thought ``What better than Wikipedia?```` 3: Wikipedia is too much of a hassle, so I'll make a MySpace or something. Westside will never be good enough, I guess...`
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,155,540
Thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Today on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,156,317
==OrphanBot== So, what should we do? We're both want him out of Wikipedia. Micoolio101
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,159,964
Darth Binky our website is Jedi-Order.blogspot.com
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
62,160,086
James u r so easy to track. U dont fool me
2,006
true
user
blocked
dev
false
62,160,821
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,163,977
r a stupid idiot james u moron, crazy, leprecaun, transvestite
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
true
62,164,715
, since her name isn't in the futurama template
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
false
62,172,549
You lil piece of shit I haven’t vandalised nothing I will fuck u up whore
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
62,172,644
== faggot == You lil piece of shit I haven’t vandalised nothing I will fuck u up wh
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
62,185,549
` No that is not what i am saying. I f u look i received a message from ``Darth Binky``. However when you look at the history it was written by major someone.... I think it is unfair for me to be told off, for someonbes elses forgery`
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,185,726
Darth Binkys name is in red, and says mec whats your clan called
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,195,185
`Please explain yourself. As of last week, you seemed to understand and accept that you cannot have a section on this page devoted to your non-existant ``book``. But as you have attempted to add the content back, it appears you never agreed. Its time for you to explain yourself. `
2,006
false
article
random
train
false
62,197,882
== GLIFL Toledo Rumble == You know the drill. Thanks! 10:39 CDT 5 July 2006 (UTC)
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,204,658
` July 2006 (UTC) ::The LT block was still designed in inches, it has the same 4.0/3.48 combo that all prior 350's had. That said, anyone calling the LS1 a ``350`` either works for a parts store or doesn't check their facts...most people refer to it as the 346 that it is, if they call it in cubes. The LS7 is at least still technically a 427, even if it isa 427.9 cubic inch engine. Ford can keep the 428 number ;) 16:18, 5`
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,207,107
Keith Urban is not country and Tim & Faith McGraw are both not country as well they are both pop! - 11:23 am, 05 July 2006
2,006
true
article
blocked
test
false
62,212,725
== Suck my dick == I assure you, my semen is considered wegetarian if you will please swallow it. Thank you please!
2,006
false
user
blocked
dev
true
62,213,515
Thank you for experimenting with the page July 15 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
2,006
true
user
random
test
false
62,220,248
LOL, don't worry. That's just the media machine. They're overhyping the disturbance east of Florida way too much. The NHC never said a storm was forming, or that a tropical depression was imminent. All they said was that conditions could become more favorable. ()
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,228,046
Merge with Phil Dick I agree this should be merged with Phillip K. Dick. This information is small enough in nature that it does not warrant its own page. Also, anyone looking up Phillip K. Dick can see this semi-interesting information. There could be a simple redirect from this page to Phillip K. Dick
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
62,228,802
== Disagree with merge == Even though they overlap, there is no reason for a full merge. Affairs and adultry are two different things, although at first though they seem to be the same. Also, both articles are long enough to warrant having seperate wiki listings. Instead, I submit that we remove the {merge} template.
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
62,233,041
, Can't you delete already. Please I no longer want this account. It's not about my talk page.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,235,993
` ::Ah, don't listen to them! If you won't listen to reason, there's always to `
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,236,077
, 5 July 2006 (UTC) ::Done. 19:32
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,252,371
Mention should be made of Ms. Ifill's calling herself a moderate when she has repeatedly chosen to cozy up to the right wing. This site lists some examples: http://www.blackcommentator.com/138/138_fr_hack_journalism.html
2,006
true
article
blocked
test
false
62,257,116
` ==Unspecified source for Image:AnjelicaHuston.jpg== {| align=``center`` style=``background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;`` | |This file may be deleted. |} Thanks for uploading Image:AnjelicaHuston.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. `
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,259,382
Please read this. A summary of it is that kryptonite effects get stronger the longer he is exposed to it. That would be consistant with the movie version. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptonite#Variations
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,263,009
` Gah!! This article is becoming a serious mess. So what I'm thinking about, is that instead of having the current sections of ``extent``, ``term in Chinese``, and ``Taiwan``, all of which are increasingly repetitive of each other, we can have two separate sections corresponding to the historically-based and culturally-based concepts of China Proper, respectively. This way the maps would have somewhere to go as well instead of being stacked on top of each other with little explanation. `
2,006
true
article
random
test
false
62,264,021
== Another welcome! == Hi there - Welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your edits to Peter Rawlinson, Baron Rawlinson of Ewell - I had been planning on updating the article with news of his death - he was on the list of those whose souls should be prayed for as they had recently died, at his local church, St. Mary the Virgin, Ewell, where [www.organum.org.uk my mum] is Director of Music. What is your connection with Ewell? PS. Get yourself an account.
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,267,871
Point taken on board, Merzbow, but it's possible to have a structure that is both chronological and geographic. Either main headings are time periods and subheadings are regions. Or main headings are regions and subheadings are time periods. Albert Hourani does approximately the first option in A History of the Arab Peoples, regarded as a standard text. I'm not categorical about what structure is best. I just think that the existing one gives the impression that the whole history was just one injustice after another, which does not chime well with the consensus of historians.
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,277,004
` :I say we go ahead and file one. Unfortunately, an RFC is necessary. Whatever the merits of one side or another may be, there are disputes that haven't been resolved by discussion. Here are some of the points of disagreement as I understand them: :*How relevant are issues such as ``909``, hate crimes and air pollution in an encyclopedic article about the university? How much space should they be given, if any? :*Should the article include the StudentsReview.com ``abomination`` quote, or any other mention of StudentsReview? Is a self-selected review site a reliable source? :I'm sure there's more. As Amerique said, the RFC doesn't have to be approved or agreed to by all users. Let's make suggestions for wording, what the RFC should or shouldn't include, etc. , , e) `
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,277,793
` == Do you mind just screwing off? == First you delete my anti-zionist symbol becuase you deem it ``offensive`` and now you're changing my talk page, just leave me and my account alone. == Headline text ==`
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
true
62,283,299
== hey look at this shit vandalism! == First image on the Web
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
62,288,308
== Damn == Damn, I'm a vandal and you're reverted like 50% of my edits in like 2 seconds! I might have to retire LOL!
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
62,293,071
Please delete this account because I'd like to get a fresh start with wikipedia. I've messed up, been bloked 5 times, you know I just want to start.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,298,132
== Request for Comment: Is the Palm Beach Airport incident encyclopedic? == RfC: * No. For reasons detailed above. I waited for the dust to settle and for the speculation to end. It was a incident without a legal consequence merely a minor embarrassment. If this is encyclopedic, then surely every media reference to Limbaugh must be encyclopedic.
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,301,104
` == Jack Nicholson and Prince Charles == In 1989 when Doctor Who was going off the air, Steve Martin went on an Australian variety show called ``Hey! Hey! It's Saturday`` and sung a song like Adam Sandler's Hannukah song, only with celebrity Whovians instead of celebrity Jews. Two of those names he listed was Prince Charles and Jack Nicholson.`
2,006
true
article
blocked
train
false
62,301,825
` ==A letter== Please don't use all-caps writning and/or excessive exclamation marks. Writing like this shows a lack of intelligence. I used to write like that, too, until I found out that I shouldn't. And could you please stop calling Nintndo Maximus ``N. M.``? Otherwise, no one will know what you're talking about!`
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
false
62,307,547
:::: The passages I deleted are obvious opinionated violations of WP:OR and are not presented as direct quotes from any source at all. I still don't understand what it is that you're defending.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,308,681
` == To whom it may concern == Oh go ahead and revert it. Go ahead and increase the block. Obviously patrolling this site fills a very big void in your life. `
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,309,968
` {| style=``border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px`` width=``100%`` |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Hello JosiahWarren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! |} {| style=``border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px`` width=``100%`` |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting started |- |style=``color:#000``| * Wikipedia Tutorial * How to edit a page * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Manual of Style * Be bold in editing * How to write a great article * WikiProjects |- ! Getting your info out there |- | style=``color:#000``| * Cite your sources * Neutral Point of View * Point of View * Verifiability * Uploading images * Image use policy |- ! Getting more Wikipedia rules |- | style=``color:#000``| * Policy Library |- |} |class=``MainPageBG`` style=``width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top``| {| width=``100%`` cellpadding=``2`` cellspacing=``5`` style=``vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA`` ! Getting help |- |style=``color:#000``| * New contributors' help page * Where to ask a question * Help Desk * Frequently Asked Questions |- ! Getting along |- |style=``color:#000``| * Wikipedians * Wikiquette * Civility * Sign your posts * Conflict resolution |- ! Getting technical |- |style=``color:#000``| * Pages needing attention * Peer review * Utilities * Village pump |- |} |} |}`
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,311,536
Any pictures of the characters?
2,006
true
article
blocked
dev
false
62,317,274
== hey fucker == hey fucker, your links have GAY PORN sites in them, you sick motherfucker!
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
62,317,349
==Hey you FUCKWAD pedophile== Do you even fucking realize what this asshole did to our country. I bet you'll be cheering when you see penises cut and put in our troops mouth.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
true
62,324,112
== Did you send a Message to RPJ? == I received a message on my talk page which I don't understand. Could you specify which passages apparently displease you? Once you do that, could you please point to the specific language in the rule you cited that supports your positiont that something is wrong with passages you identified? Thank you.
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,330,315
:Tell that to my dead relatives.
2,006
true
user
blocked
test
false
62,330,318
2006 (UTC) : Another thanks for sorting Deconsecration, my very first article (no linger a virgin!). I wasn't even aware of stub sorting before you came along, so double thanks. I'll be sure to sort my stub tags from here on in. 07:24, 6 July
2,006
true
user
random
test
false
62,331,473
` : It's not left out as it is already in the TinyMud section...``Some use the term MU* to refer to TinyMUD, MUCK, MUSH, MUSE, MUX, and their kin; others simply allow the term MUD to apply universally``. The problem with the other sections is that after defining the term as a referring to Tiny's, you then attempt to use MU* as a universal term. MU* is well known to have two meanings depending on who is using it, all muds or only muds from the tiny family. The page uses MUD as the universal term not MU*. `
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,332,831
Look ass Derek Fisher, Devin Brown, & Bow Wow are all facts. And another fact your are a BIATCH
2,006
true
user
random
train
true
62,336,883
` == July 2006 == Thank you for experimenting with the page Wiki on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. `
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,336,930
==Syracuse== Maybe you'll be interested in this: Talk:Syracuse#Support. Ciao!!
2,006
true
user
random
train
false
62,336,997
=F1-05= ==Race 1 Australia== =F1-06= ==Race 1 Bahrain==
2,006
true
user
random
test
false
62,348,131
` == His Royal Highness Eduardo Salvador Diego Alonso Rivero Puente y Cortina von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha zu Leiningen == Who are you to tell me I'm not ``His Imperial Majesty``?`
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,350,329
==All European Final== It is the first all European World Cup Final since the 1982 final between West Germany and Italy. It is also the first all European semi finals since the same year where West Germany, Italy, POland and France were in the semis.
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,352,695
THIS USER - - IS A PROVEN VANDAL IN WIKIPEDIA. UNTIL HE STOPS HIS ILL-FATED TACTICS - WHICH CLEARLY FIGHT AGAINST WIKIPEDIA'S GUIDELINES - HIS METHODS SHALL BE USED AGAINST HIMSELF. AMONG HIS MOST RECENT FOUL PLAY, THE USER LEIFERN HAS PROVABLY PARTICIPATED IN PUSHING FALSE INFORMATION AND IMPROPER TACTICS IN RELATION TO THE WIKIPEDIA'S KVEN ARTICLE, INCLUDING PUSHING A SPLITTING OF THAT ARTICLE, WHICH ATTEMPT HAS NOW LED TO A NEW INFORMATIONAL WAR IN THE KVEN RELATED ARTICLES - UNNECESSARILY, AS RECENTLY A MUCH WELCOMED CONSENSUS HAD ALREADY BEEN REACHED. ADVOCATING A MINDLESS BLOCKING OF AN INNOCENT CONTRIBUTOR FOR THE KVEN ARTICLE IS ALSO GOING TO BACKFIRE AGAINST MR. LEIFERN, UNLESS HE MAKES A CLEAR EFFORT TO CORRECT THINGS. On behalf of the entire Wikipedia Community -
2,006
true
user
blocked
train
false
62,355,165
` :::I've given this some more thought and I wanted to point out that the section under ``Prognosis`` that talks about the ``World Health Organization`` taking couple of ``long-term`` studies. In that case, the information suggested that there is some link to developed nations and schizophrenia. Yet, nothing more is said about the link or whether it was proven or disproven. Yet we consider the source to be reliable. Most likely that same standard would eliminate large chunks of this article. There is no precedent for not including data simply because we don't personally think it is legitimate. Information that is early or speculative but authoritative should be included, but with a proper explanation. If it turns out the viral link was wrong, well then it is an interesting historical fact. If it turns out that the link is something, well we don't want to miss out on that either. The same could be said about the studies I mentioned at the start of this post. For all we know it is just errors in methodology, but maybe not. :::Given I just read your post as I was typing the above, I will say this: Why is the World Health Organization study still included then? `
2,006
true
article
random
test
false
62,359,706
I think it would be easier to deal with this issue if we distinguished between capitalism as an ideology and capitalism as a historically specific set of institutions (both of which have been studied by social scientists and historians). |
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,362,103
, 6 July 2006 (UTC) :::Much more clear. 12:59
2,006
true
article
random
dev
false
62,362,479
JA: Go with the spelling in the Standard Edition. Unless of course there are US and UK variants of the SE, in which case flip a koine.
2,006
true
article
random
train
false
62,369,214
must be queer yourself to care about it. Jun 14
2,006
false
user
blocked
train
true
62,373,143
your right it shouldn't b there icnore it or change it is my suggestion.
2,006
false
article
random
test
false