dirtycomputer/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels · Datasets at Hugging Face

rev_id int64 37.7k 700M	comment stringlengths 5 10k	year int64 2k 2.02k	logged_in bool 2 classes	ns stringclasses 2 values	sample stringclasses 2 values	split stringclasses 3 values	attack bool 2 classes
42,083,758	` ::I'd love to hear your reasoning about how I'm ``hurting myself``. Physically? Emotionally? Mentally? My ``wiki reputation``? If so, you have much more to worry about than I do - learn the difference between your and you're. I'm not vandalizing anything - I stated Crumbsucker did not spell well and changed justified text to unjustified text (which are facts, as evidenced by his edits).`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
42,084,704	Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
42,087,709	` And since you seem to love policy, here's what it actually says on Signing your posts on talk pages: ``Although it may be advisable to follow it, it is not however policy.`` So, you are incorrect - it is NOT policy. Stop attempting to justify your incoherent actions by referencing policy.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,106,494	I am not for or against Scientology, but in wanting to research this issue found the article beneficial. Homosexuality as treated by Scientology in the 21st century sounds similar to the way it is treated in other churches. -MV	2,006	false	article	random	train	false
42,112,284	*PK, I don't have a problem with what you've done. But Wikipedia:Article size still suggests small stubs should be up-merged. Queensway still needs a lot of work before it really stands as an independent article (if ever). I've put a merge tag on the other article, and I'll suggest it to RfC.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
42,116,044	You must be a complete moron. You have no authority to warn people. I just warned you, too. Big Whoop. Stop bugging people and get a life.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
42,118,057	You guys are a bunch of control freaks who band together to stomp out anything or anybody who doesn't think like you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	true
42,119,585	::: YOU STILL REFUSE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE VANDAL I WAS REVERTING!!!!!!	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,121,103	Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
42,133,407	[[Image:Tyrone Biggums.jpg\|right\|thumb\|Chappelle as	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,134,542	==Question== I was wondering, if you buy a gold ring, will that increase inflation?	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
42,135,768	Well, I'm quite sure that some horn players can play up to about a G above the staff without chipping or making it sound terribly ugly.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,135,933	Thats funny, my name is David and I play the horn, so does my friend named David.	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
42,138,119	` ==Your recent edits== `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
42,142,852	br> If you're going to keep revising the page every time, at the very least keep the updated numbers that I put in there instead of a wholesale deletion. That's not being professional - that's being just vindictive.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,145,790	` :It is your opinion that it is nonsense. I consider it a personal attack that you consider my edit ``nonsense``; hence, by policy, you are also guilty of vandalism on this page. This argument is circular. As for the Medea page, challenge each point directly and logically, but don't use such blanket terms such as ``nonsense`` and ``vandalism`` without backing it up.`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
42,154,282	br> Please do not keep undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,162,608	If you would like to share it with someone else, type {{user pro-cannabis\|stamp\|right}}	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,174,747	::Interesting. We do read the same paper. Let us discuss each other's sexual depravity, your Republican homo-ness and my Democratic butch-ness.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,180,060	==Lying== Impumozzhi you have been exposed on Talk:Rathore. What will it take to make you stop lying?. =	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
42,182,639	==The main discussion== The current Mrs. Nussle is a typical right-wing Republican slut with a trophy husband. Neo-pagan finds this offensive to his neo-pagan anti-Christian, spit on the Ten Commandments sensibilities.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,186,164	` I have changed around the article quite a bit and removed some info from ``Giggle Loop``. If somebody wants to add it back then go ahead but I thought it was unnecessary. `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,206,660	I will not tollerate any kind of Anti-Romanian discrimination on my page. I will delete any form of Anti-Romanian edits made here.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,210,183	==Stop it!== Stop it right now! Continuing you will only help the anti-romanian users. I will revert your work.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,210,455	== Cleanup notice == I've removed this notice because I don't think this article needs it anymore. If I've oversteped my bounds on this then I apologize. ( )	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
42,211,680	==Anti-Romanian== How do you combat Anti-Romanian edits from Wikipedia? There are several users that enjoy having Anti-Romanian edits. They keep attacking some Romanian related pages by edits that may be considered as Anti-Romanian one.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,212,956	==Cool man, just cool!==	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,218,890	:Like if you were from Switzerland (I'm thinking the French part dont know if he was from Stelzenstrasse 4, CH-8152 Glattbrugg,Zurich!!!!	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,219,768	==Music Video Table== I thought I'd do a music video table seen as the Guns N' Roses page has one. Note the 'All Apologies' video although from 'Unplugged' was in fact released as promotional video for the In Utero single. Likewise the Aneurysm video is taken from 'Live Tonight Sold Out' but was in fact released as a promo video for 'From The Muddy Banks of The Wishkha'. The other two unplugged songs were also released as VHS promos for Unplugged.	2,006	false	article	random	test	false
42,221,973	==Move pages== It has been suggested to move Guantanamo Bay to the correct spelling of Guantánamo Bay and create an own article for U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay.	2,006	true	article	random	dev	false
42,224,714	` == Khwarizmi being Persian: Original research, which has nothing to do with Wikipedia == Let's look into the Persians' claims, shall we? Zmmz lists Merriam-Webster with this quote: ``Function: biographical name circa 780-circa 850 Muhammad ibn MusA al-KhwArizmI Islamic (Persian-born) mathematician & astronomer; one of the greatest scientific minds of Islam; source of much of mathematical knowledge of medieval Europe``. Notice, it says ``Persian-born`` in parantheses, and gives Islamic as the nationality. Basically, they defined him by religion and stated his place of birth. He was born in Khwarizm, in the Khorasan province. At the time of his birth, it was part of the Arab Islamic Caliphate, now it's part of the Uzbegistan nation-state. Alas, Persians burnt us saying that it's in fact Persian, so let's take it as Persian. Now, according to sources cited by Heja Helwada, Khorasan in general had a huge Arab population. In accordance to that, defining him as Persian simply because he was born in Khorasan, is not only disputed at best, it also constitutes OR(original research) which is against Wiki's policy, see: WP:NOR A troll showed up lately and claimed that Arabs are fighting a losing battle, I'm not sure we're in a battle-field here, but I got the gist: he thinks we have no sources...poor little guy! Sources that state he's explicitly an Arab: http://www.bartleby.com/65/al/AlKhowar.html http://uk.encarta.msn.com/text_761560322___0/Khwarizmi_al-.html http://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-9311992 Who's losing the ``battle`` now, I wonder? `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,226,379	Woop is used if w00t is needed to be expresed sarcastically, atleast, that's the way it is with the people I speak to.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,231,754	==Romanian language== Romanian language is spoken about 26-30 millions people in the world. It is not spoken only in Romania I hope you do realize this?! If in the articles it is written that in one country is one language (e.g. Romanian for Romania and Moldovan language for Moldova) then it's a false and must be corrected. You have to understand this. There are 3 things that may cover the truth: 1. indifference 2. escapism 3. ... till next time if ever.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,238,139	` Sources that his father was Magi? He himself was a Sunni Muslim(it's not debated)...weird, no? Actually, your logic says that everyone who wrote in Arabic is under suspicion of being a Persian untill proven otherwise, is self-contradictory. I'm an Arab, is my ethnicity under suspicion because I talk, write, and think in Arabic? Very self-contradictory indeed. Also, what's this about there being no debate about him being Persian? Who are these ``informed Islamic scholars``? Their names? Sources where they said that he was Persian? Give me tangible proof...untill then, he's obviously an Arab by the bulk of evidence and sources I gave. `	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
42,240,608	==Bishon== nonsense? excuse me, but i think goro has an unbelievible importance to our society. While, On the other hand, neither you nor your webpage seem to, peasant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • 20:28, 4 March 2006.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
42,246,210	:::I will not censor my opinions—especially not for the sake of dictatorships!	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
42,253,351	== CCDs == the technology may be dead, but did it spawn Charged coupled devices? formally known as charged bubble devices? Charge-coupled_device#History - this need to be checked out by a self proclamed expert.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
42,261,818	(probably more by now)	2,006	false	article	blocked	test	false
42,264,475	==What exactly is the problem?== The statement was accurate in it's entirety, and the people contacted were a small part of those affected. Why do you think this is inappropriate?	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,264,580	`. You may find other people changing the introduction in astonished disbelief of the ``pine waves`` story. A little repetition never hurt, especially since it gives a chance to add your information about the different Kanji pictograms. -It should be agreeable to everybody that possibly useful information (correction of popular misconceptions) should not be removed from a public encyclopedia. Doing that might be considered vandalism and I may have to complain to more senior Wikipedians. -At least try to keep your edits clean if you must continue reversing my additions. This last time you left off the period in the introduction and left the ``Notes`` header unused, in addition to your first reversal that makes your changes look more like vandalism. You'll note that I look back at my edits and correct typos`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,265,049	==Your userpage was briefly delisted by a rogue admin== You have a userbox Template:User UN which links your userpage to United Nations Wikipedians. There is currently a movement to ban userboxes from Wikipedia which are shared and which create Lists of Wikipedians. Certain admins have taken it upon themselves to preemptively sabotage and/or delete such categories and template. Here is the incident report which reported damage to yours, in which hundreds of userpages were delinked from categories without the users' knowledge. They have been stopped, barely, and the damage reverted— for now. There is a Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll, which if passed, will make required by policy the damage done to categories and templates such as User UN/United Nations Wikipedians. If you do not want this to happen, I urge you to vote Oppose. in the poll. Support is currently running at about 66%, and your vote could make the difference. It is said to require 75%-80% to be deemed reflective of consensus. Thank you,	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
42,267,890	:I did not use a bot. I contacted one-by-one a list of people who were affected by a recent wrongful action. I did not attack anyone personally, except to characterize their actions as rogue, which they were. Finally, I am entitled to speak with as many people as I like on a matter of common interest. Please lift this block immediately.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,274,648	==I'm back== Cheers, mate	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,276,545	(second level warning) >	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
42,288,436	*Probably the best bet would be to subst them and simply copy article text. I'll perform a subst really quickly to make this easier for you. (Alternatively, you could located all of the templates used, and copy over the text that way, but I think that's more trouble than it's worth.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
42,288,677	:Actually, looks like it got deleted before I could finish there. What templates where you using?	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
42,288,938	Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,294,848	because I am a huge asshole	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,295,475	` == Questions == If they were a Basque band, how could they be considered influential on ``Hispanic`` Punk? Even if they were influential on Spanish Punk, the term ``Hispanic`` refers to Mestizo Latin American culture usually, so a Spanish, let alone Basque, band should not be credited under that term.`	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,297,973	So StarForce will indeed bring some balance. ::	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
42,298,685	== Yes, to oppose is pro-userbox == The proposal has the consequences of, * doing away with categories of Wikipedians by POV * preventing the common listing of userboxes in a directory * preventing userbox templates deemed not of benefit to creating an encyclopaedia, a messy criterion * preventing userbox templates deemed POV or advocacy, a messy criterion * the pro UN template and category would likely be deleted Please read the proposal for more, but, yes, to oppose is pro-userbox. BTW, I was blocked for telling you (and 43 other UN Wikipedians) this, but one wonders how else you would have learned of this. =) Tell more people, few know,	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,299,709	===March 2006=== Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
42,301,372	:*OK, I'll see about helping you out with those shortly. I won't be able to do that for a few hours, but I will try and get back to you as soon as possible.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,309,827	Copyright issues? There looks like there are copyright issues with this article, but I'm still a newbie, and am really not confortable yet with the instructions here, so I'm just going to add the sources, and ask that someone else look this over to see if I really did spot a issue. Thanks	2,006	false	article	random	dev	false
42,309,884	== United State Libertarian Party Link == What does Mr. Bell have to do with the US LP? :	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,313,136	:You all ignore the fact that the participants are mostly of those who have an ax to grind regarding userboxes, a self-selected audience. If I had wanted to stuff the ballot, I could have laid in hundreds of notes to polarized user groups from random ips, instead, I spoke to 40-or-so by hand of a fairly neutral group who were directly affected by this ridiculous proposal. :Also, citing an arbcom ruling rather than policy shows how contrived this is. Mindspillage asked me to reconsider, he said nothing about policy or blocking. How can you say inviting participants to a Wikipedia-wide issue is disruptive? How can you say that I should somehow have known that? The real question is, why is this thing not on the main page? The answer is, because most would oppose it, but the anti-userbox admins think they know what is best, and are pulling every trick they can to cram this through. :If you want to design either a jury-pool process or a general election process to decide such things, I'll be happy to help you. :How is this a personal attack, except to note that the mass blanking happened and the perpetrator is documented? Face it, the ban came only because what I said is unpopular with admins. MarkSweep made hundreds of blanking edits using admin tools, speciously twisted rules into knots and disrupted hundreds of users. He got a slap on the wrist, and polite applause. I've received notes from admins on this page threatening me for suggesting that his actions constitute vandalism, which they clearly do. I pass a note pointing this out to a small subset of the hundreds of users affected, I am banned for 31 hours. How is this not political? Now I'm afraid to contact my own friends here, whom I know to be against this, but do not know about it. :Tacky? Pretending this proposal is put before a representative audience is tacky, as is the slash-and-burn approach taken in the first place, as is the attempts by MarkSweep to fit me with a gag until the end of UPP (that is REALLY tacky), as is the naked political calculation on my AN/I as to how this speaks for their pet proposal, and how it should be played. The fact is that this proposal will never have community assent because of its deep flaws, and I am resented for pointing this out. Tacky is pretending in the face of all evidence that there is a basis for consensus here. :	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,313,795	Oh, I see I've been blocked again. Mindspillage's statement is in part patently false: yes, I do not believe I did anything wrong, no I did not indicate in any way I would continue to do so. I was unblocked for several hours and did not do so. Common decency indicates the block should be lifted, or am I simply being punished for my views?	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,314,801	:I believe that the guidelines were printed in the September-October 1993 issue of the Earth First! Journal, as part of the article that announced the creation of the ELF. As far as I know that article is not online. They were listed on The ELF website, which was run by the NAELFPO, under a statement that said anyone could commit an action on behalf of the ELF as long as they adhered to the guidelines. 8:11, 5 March 2006(UTC)	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
42,316,955	* I agree with pm_shef, (lets celebrate, we agree on something!) Mario Racco’s name should stay up on here, the fact of the matter is he filed nomination papers and then withdrawn. I would like to put up an explanation why he did this but we do need some reference. It is speculative why he did this although I again agree with pm_shef when he made the assumption it was to draw funds out of his municipal campaign fund, which seems like a reasonable reason to me. I don’t know what the laws are on putting your name in for nomination while holding other office. But this now seems to be a common practice here in Vaughan for example, Alan Shefman put his name in to run municipally in 2004 by-election (Councillor) while still holding another municipally elected position (school trustee), Susan Kadis did a similar thing in 2004 as well, running federally while still holding municipal office and Racco also did it in 2003 when he ran provincially while still holding municipal office. I do have to say this practice may be legal but I see it as unethical. The most ethical way for candidates to deal with this situation is what Oliva Chow did (in Toronto), she actually resigned her municipal councillor position prior to running for federal office.	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,329,778	2006 (UTC)d ::It doesn't matter, it's all lopsided and squashed, that is what is important!! 11:33, 5 March	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,332,398	Suck my greasy dick, I will start creating thousands of pages using different names and you can eat the corn out of my shit if you like. I can create far more than you can ever delete. I will use various screennames, various site titles, and all so don't fuck with me you split lip bitch.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
42,332,429	== eat my shit == Title says it all.	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	true
42,337,635	` The table is based on the ridiculous claims of the fascist SDA party, thus that is why called it fascist. I do not say that you are a fascist, but that you use information from fascist sources. Serbia-Montenegro was not a side in YOUR war, thus that warsion of table is totally ridiculous and wrong. It was a CIVIL war between 3 peoples of the country. Furthermore, Serbia-Montenegro was formed in 2003, thus we cannot speak about it in 1992-1995. Its predecesor, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, only supported one of the sides in the war, but it was not directly involved in it. Milosevic did not signed the Dazton agreement in the name of FRZ, but in the name of the Republika Srpska. It is a big difference. `	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
42,337,738	(Nathanrdotcom,, Tawker, Ryan Delaney, Theresa knott, FireFox)	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,339,418	::::: Maybe they ARE on drugs. I don't know. Have fun at Uncyclopedia.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	true
42,339,992	It's locked, for why I have no idea. There was hardly even any revert war. Maybe someone wanted to lock it in place in a dubious state. Uncrediwikia... SHEESH!!! )	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,340,266	And thinking more about Fahrenheit451's comment. OSA collaborator? LOL! Maybe Fahrenheit451 is an Office of Psychiatric Affairs collaborator tasked to disrupt Wikipedia and harass editors who disagree with the kook line. My guess is as good as his.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,348,894	: Well - say why and suggest what could be better.	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
42,352,341	Not the same person== Stop changing it to your opinions. Claude Speed and Claude are not the same thing. I'm editing it. Stupid pimple faced kids.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	true
42,354,537	== Anal sex == I am gay and actively engage in anal sex most nights. it doesnt hurt so whats wrong with it?	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,357,667	:Ok, I disambiguated.	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
42,371,246	==Little Eichmanns?== He calls the people who were killed on 9/11 little eichmanns? This is a seriously evil man. What if your own mother was killed in 9/11. Would you label her a 'little eichmann'?	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,372,220	`Things you should know about Wikipedia * There's always people who are going to take an overactive interest in your talk page and change it to fit what they want it to say...these people have no life. * Some administrators will lecture you as if you're their own kid...ignore them...that's what I do. * Saying somebody has a ``hard on`` for your talk page can get you blocked. But when other people come to your defense in the situation...you really only end up being blocked for 15 minutes. `	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,373,551	` == Vandalism == Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [[Wikipedia:Esperanza\|e]] `	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
42,375,315	` On another point, the article includes a quote of Rawat's supposedly drawn from his first website: In an article named Journey that he published in his personal website on January 1999, Prem Rawat writes about this apparent contradiction: People through the years have tried to place me in a mold, and from the very early years I have not been able to oblige them. When I was very young, people were looking for the ``old silver-haired Guru with flowing white robes.`` I was only eight. When people were flocking to India for their search, I was in the West. When people were looking for sophisticated discourses, I spoke of simple things. When people wanted nirvana, I said, ``You need peace.`` When people said, ``Tell us of the scriptures,`` I said, ``Look within you.`` When people asked, ``What is your qualification?`` I said, ``Judge me by what I offer.`` To this day, some people see me the way they want to. After all, I guess it is rather inconvenient to see things as they really are. I have evolved, but my message stays the same. Externally, I have changed but within me, something stays the same. In that same article Rawat states that people wanted to see him as a figurehead and as a leader but that he does not want to be one or the other, and that all he wanted to do is speak to those who wanted to hear him, and impart the Knowledge to those that sought it. He also said that if people like what is given, to practice it and if not, to leave it.[14] However, the attribution link takes one to Rawat's current site instead. If there is no proper attribution here, this passage should be deleted, no? `	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,377,327	== A friendly notice about Edit Summaries == Please can you considering using Edit Summaries? It's optional, but looking at a page like this it just shows lots of edits and it's difficult to track who is doing what. Thanks for the understanding. His Imposingness, the Grand Moff	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
42,386,528	==what if i don't want to?	2,006	false	user	blocked	train	false
42,392,025	` == Wikiportal:Ukraine == I like it! One question: you mentioned boards on my talk page... where are they? :Just look at several windows at the portal. In one window at the right-hand side you will see ``new article announcement board`` and ``Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board``. Also, use Portal's own talk page to discuss portal itself. Add all these to your watchlist. Feel free to update any window and, especially, current news. Finally, don't be afraid to screw up. Anything can be easily reverted by you or anyone else. Regards, July 7, 2005 05:33 (UTC) See Wikipedia talk:Wikiportal/Ukraine re double edit. 7 July 2005 06:46 (UTC). == Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine == I also very well understand what is behind your editings and would like to remind you that Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine. Any wrong information should be removed from the articles and, be sure, it will be removed. This my positive contribution to the Wikipedia. It improves the quality of the resource, because wrong information is much worse than lack of information. If you are not agree and would like put the information back, please folow the Wikipedia_official_policy and cite a cite credible sources. Switch yourself to a constructive work, it will help you to find mutural understanding with most of Wikipedians, including myself. ::Couldn't agree more... You both must really have guts to say this. I mean that's funny who's talking about propaganda machine. ::Well, it simply seems that providing no sources when asked to is nothing uncommon in your modus operandi. Or am I wrong? (BTW, no offence intended, just a friendly note). Halibutt, you may turn this into an ethics dispute if you want. I would only welcome you or this fellow to start an RfC against me to expose your unsourced POV pushing and my attempt to resist that to which you respond with personal attacks. As for your ``no offence``, I take everything you said at the face value and I am capable to figure out your intentions from what you say rather than from what you claim you are saying. ::I merely pointed to the fact that, apparently, I'm not the only person to ask you for sources - as politely as I could - and not the onbly person you ignored, contrary to the good ol' Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Cite sources rules. If you take it as an offence - I can't do much about it, can I. Halibutt, how many times do I have to say that this is not about sources. This is about the liberty you take to interprete them and derive conclusions you favor that are just not there. And never have I ``ignored``. If you refuse to see the answers repeated so many times, I can't do much about it, can I? We can only wait for others to agree or disagree whether the answers to your and my conserns are adequate. Those ``others`` didn't show up for a while. Still no reason to beleive that the dispute was somehow solved by itself. As for your claimed ``politeness`` the article's talk page speaks for that. But as for ``offence``, if I were so easily offended, I would not be able to be at Wikipedia. We all have seen worse than that. It is not for thin-skinned to edit history articles. You should see AndriyK's language he used and even that didn't make me loose my sleep. ==Ru Pravda== Dear Irpen! Sorry if I chose the wrong words for expressing my frustration with AndriyK's behavior. I didn't mean to hurt anybody's feelings. It's just that I've seen a lot of stuff done to a few of my articles that deal with Ukraine's people or geography in one way or another, so I decided to stay away from such topics. I appreciate your hard work in the Russian Portal! Keep it up and see you there. :If it wasn't done by AndriyK lately, it was probably done by people who aren't on WP for months. Were there any recent incidents? I would love to see more Russian editors helping at UA-portal. In fact I called for that repeatedly as well as to Polish boards. With a few exceptions we never had serious conflicts. If you can, please do contribute to Ukrainian articles. == Ukraine related topics == Irpen, I would try to support you, although my knowledge of Ukrainian history is mostly limited to Soviet schoolbooks, and discourse is mostly the imperialistic one. I like your edits better, thou I am not sure if it is the right way to weed out all the Polish names from the cities that were Polish. Would it hurt that much if we would add the third (Polish) name in the first string if they want it so badly? :No it would not always hurt. It will help in some and would hurt in some other cases. I will explain later, have to go now. Thanks ::I agree with your explanations, OK, lets go into the edit war :::Dear maffiosi, I don't think the edit war is a lasting solution. Perhaps it's time to discuss Andriy's disruptive policies at the Administrators' notice board? During his stint in the Wiki, he didn't contribute anything valuable but spelling reverts and personal attacks on other editors. May we ask to ban him? We may ask to ban him but, as I told him at his talk page, I was trying to avoid it as much as I could. He violated 3RR multiple times and I showed it to him warning that he may get banned but I never actually proceeded in listing him for banning. Besides, after 24-48 hour ban he will be back even more aggravated and will continue his crusade with even more rigor. He may also find ways to circumvent 3RR or simply stay just under it and this pain will go on. On the other hand, IMO he've done enough for the full-blown arbitration, which may result in a longer ban. If anyone would want to compile an arbitration case, I will comment on it. But as of yet, I would not start it myself. Several people are trying to talk to him and I hope he would listen. But if nothing changes, he will en up banned for sure. :I think your position is fine. Just one question, is it absolutely, positively provent that OUN authorized the Lvov pogrom and it was not a spontaneus action? If its not 100% proven, we might add some NPOV hedging, like most of the scolars believe..., etc., not just blankly link the pogrom to OUN. I agree that there are differences of opinions on this. The article provides references that support both versions and both should be mentioned. I explained that some of the sources brought up by this user are controversial but this is no reason to totally dismiss them. What I oppose is that the user simply blanks from the article a sourced version he doesn't like. == Discussion on maidanua.org == Hi, I've read that discussion with some interest. Your characterization as ``User Irpen is a very cunning, ingenious, and stubborn troll.`` (``Користувач Irpen - дуже хитрий, винахідливий і наполегливий троль.``) was especially amusing. What can I say - ці западенці зовсім з глузду з'їхали. Maybe, not all of them, but a significant proportion for sure. :Now you are in danger too ). But seriously, it just hurts. Really, I mean you probably saw what was going on in en-Wiki and had no time to interfere. I took it upon myself to deal with this and I am getting all the heat now. (. And now this slander. I tried all I can to talk to user AndriyK. I was accused in Ukrayinophobia by someone else who retracted it and we are even having a decent correspondance now. But I just don't want to leave something to which I gave so much time. Just check my recent edit history to get a clue. Well, anyway, if I stay I might need help. If you have time, just try to talk to these new people if you can't participate in editing for the lack of time. I tried and I am getting this. Michael tried too. He was not cursed (perhaps because he has an orange ribbon on his page )). Still, he was just ignored. I don't know. If this goes on, we need to engage new editors in productive editing or repell this attack. Or leave ourselves. But this is the last thing I want to do... ::I understand it was very offensive. But you shouldn't worry too much - there are always crazy people out there. And how do we know he is not paid for what he does? It may be a form of an information war strategy. Similar to specifically hired participants in popular forums, like pravda.com.ua or inosmi.ru. They often pick an active user and start dumping sh-t on him. You would be quite a natural choice. N	2,006	true	user	random	test	false
42,392,607	I have done a rough chronological order	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
42,392,796	his associates were using.	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,396,124	what is the three major sports in cleveland please send back fast i really need it from stephane from austraila	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,396,643	`::From what I gather, rollbacks can deplete a user's level of credibility with admins; considering that a rollback is the only way I know of repealing this action, I fail to see why I should be the one at the chopping block. ::Seeing that you are a ``patroller``, it is incumbent upon you to avoid stepping on people's toes; retorting with ``...I have told my logic of the move...`` is hardly an appropriate response to a blunder that you made... `	2,006	true	user	random	dev	false
42,399,896	==Seven Liberal Arts and Astrology== Dantes associations do not appear to be correct, according to this link. the Moon resembles Grammar Mercury may be compared to Dialectics Venus may be compared to Rhetoric the Sun may be compared to Arithmetic Mars may be compared to music Jupiter may be compared to Geometry *Saturn may be compared to Astrology	2,006	true	article	blocked	test	false
42,403,180	` :Hi, the {{AIDnom}} template is an editorial notification and therefore falls in the category of ``talk page templates``. It was designed as such and is styled with that purpose in mind. See also Template_talk:AIDnom#Talk_page_template. `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
42,405,245	-Ron, your sanity is now in question. Once again you are failing to understand that I am helping to clear up the story, not perpetuate it. -it is useful to those who heard the story and need some additional information. Since even my reasonable explanation of this is being ignored, I am once again disputing this article. Please do not delete contributions without going through the protocol and getting all input. I have flagged this to the Wikipedia community and I am contacting my source.	2,006	false	article	blocked	train	false
42,405,273	` :You bet your ass it's inappropriate. We don't appreciate foreigners like you referring to Avram Iancu, a national hero, as ``someone famous for killing a lot of Hungarians. - ==Political bias== I've reverted the last edits to the last version by Bogdangiusca. Obviously POV, using words like ``extremely mationalist`` and ``an affront to the Hungarian community`` have no place in an encyclopedia article whose role is to inform readers about said person, nothing more. If you have strong opinions about a politician, write them on your own website. Wikipedia can not be used for: Praising a politician. Providing negative propaganda about a politician. If you want to do those things, it is your right, just not here. It's not up to you to judge whether Funar's municipal modifications were ``anti-Hungarian`` or whatnot, since I can sure as hell list a whole list of anti-Romanian actions that the UDMR has done in its history. - `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,410,757	==Wrestling Arenas== I'm going to make a deal with you...I would like to only put major annual wrestling ppvs on the arena sites; it is an honor to be chosen. That is better than no mention, but not as far as I was planning to go...all 12 ppvs per year. I think that is fair.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,411,336	` Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Culture shock. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —•• EMAIL• `	2,006	true	user	random	train	false
42,414,510	==Chadbryant strikes again== This did not take long. Please go to Rec.sport.pro-wrestling. You will see that has deleted relevant information on the main page with his last edit. He hates anything to do with the South, so he deleted mention of the Tennessee-based wrestling organization, TNA. He also warned of a personal attack on the talk page by when there was none. Please document this along with the arena deletions he's made and take the appropriate action. Thank you.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,416,831	::: I laugh at Chadbryant spelling GRAMMAR wrong and urge him to find instances where my grammar, spelling, or punctuation was wrong. Furthermore, considering that we are editing sites related to professional wrestling, the definition of encyclopedic is open to interpretation. My goal is to document those arenas who have held major wrestling ppvs, especially repeat venues, as it has become an honor and tradition to host them.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,417,863	::::: Please explain how anything above is in any way a personal attack. If you are going to accuse someone of poor writing skills, than you should demonstrate you are the superior linguist. Again, I ask you for proof of poor edits on my part. Furthermore, your reverting of edits without explanation or merit is in violation of Wikipedia policy. Please, ADMIN, I ask you to provide a solution to this senselessness I have had to deal with this week because of this Wikipedian.	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,420,567	` ::: I dont see you arguement Rhobite. Facts arnt trivial and as you said below as long as they can be verified its ok to add. Are you saying these facts arnt verifiable? Also you might not want to take the literal verifiable arguement, because it would mean you better start deleting... Why dont we just say Shakepeare was born in England... why even mention stratford? Why even mention dates... My point is this what is so wrong with adding detail if detail is there to be had? Im confused where does it say in Education he had a job ``Designing and installing computerized back office`` in 1978. ???`	2,006	true	article	random	test	false
42,425,435	` == 78th Academy Awards == Please stop using edit summaries that give away the winners. [[WP:EA\|E]] + at 03:48 UTC (2006-03-06) :Everyone is watching, it's not a spoiler. Oh well, if it's annoying, fine. , Monday March 6 2006 at 03:51`	2,006	true	user	blocked	dev	false
42,425,501	I won't do the edits	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,428,307	I know You dan't want Me to pass, I'm not surprised , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:15	2,006	true	user	blocked	train	false
42,428,682	` ==Forget it== :Nothing against you, but I will have to bring these edits up at any future Requestfor adminship of yours. This is something we don't want in our admins, self vanity. [[WP:EA\|E]] + at 04:12 UTC (2006-03-06) I know You don't want Me to pass, I'm not surprised. You always look for negativity in Me anyways. , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:15`	2,006	true	user	blocked	test	false
42,429,609	` :Great changes - hope you don't mind mine! ε* `	2,006	true	article	blocked	train	false
42,429,669	. Honestly, that's ridiculous (in my opinion).	2,006	true	article	random	train	false
42,430,166	== Crash! == Another movie from left field. i have to ask, why did Star Wars: Episode III even got nominated. People go to see movies like those , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:30	2,006	true	article	blocked	dev	false
42,430,891	I. Why don't YOU debate first before starting an edit war?	2,006	false	user	blocked	dev	false

42,083,758

` ::I'd love to hear your reasoning about how I'm ``hurting myself``. Physically? Emotionally? Mentally? My ``wiki reputation``? If so, you have much more to worry about than I do - learn the difference between your and you're. I'm not vandalizing anything - I stated Crumbsucker did not spell well and changed justified text to unjustified text (which are facts, as evidenced by his edits).`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

42,084,704

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

42,087,709

` And since you seem to love policy, here's what it actually says on Signing your posts on talk pages: ``Although it may be advisable to follow it, it is not however policy.`` So, you are incorrect - it is NOT policy. Stop attempting to justify your incoherent actions by referencing policy.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,106,494

I am not for or against Scientology, but in wanting to research this issue found the article beneficial. Homosexuality as treated by Scientology in the 21st century sounds similar to the way it is treated in other churches. -MV

2,006

false

article

random

train

false

42,112,284

*PK, I don't have a problem with what you've done. But Wikipedia:Article size still suggests small stubs should be up-merged. Queensway still needs a lot of work before it really stands as an independent article (if ever). I've put a merge tag on the other article, and I'll suggest it to RfC.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

42,116,044

You must be a complete moron. You have no authority to warn people. I just warned you, too. Big Whoop. Stop bugging people and get a life.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

42,118,057

You guys are a bunch of control freaks who band together to stomp out anything or anybody who doesn't think like you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

true

42,119,585

::: YOU STILL REFUSE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE VANDAL I WAS REVERTING!!!!!!

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,121,103

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

42,133,407

[[Image:Tyrone Biggums.jpg|right|thumb|Chappelle as

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,134,542

==Question== I was wondering, if you buy a gold ring, will that increase inflation?

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

42,135,768

Well, I'm quite sure that some horn players can play up to about a G above the staff without chipping or making it sound terribly ugly.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,135,933

Thats funny, my name is David and I play the horn, so does my friend named David.

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

42,138,119

` ==Your recent edits== `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

42,142,852

br> If you're going to keep revising the page every time, at the very least keep the updated numbers that I put in there instead of a wholesale deletion. That's not being professional - that's being just vindictive.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,145,790

` :It is your opinion that it is nonsense. I consider it a personal attack that you consider my edit ``nonsense``; hence, by policy, you are also guilty of vandalism on this page. This argument is circular. As for the Medea page, challenge each point directly and logically, but don't use such blanket terms such as ``nonsense`` and ``vandalism`` without backing it up.`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

42,154,282

br> Please do not keep undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,162,608

If you would like to share it with someone else, type {{user pro-cannabis|stamp|right}}

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,174,747

::Interesting. We do read the same paper. Let us discuss each other's sexual depravity, your Republican homo-ness and my Democratic butch-ness.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,180,060

==Lying== Impumozzhi you have been exposed on Talk:Rathore. What will it take to make you stop lying?. =

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

42,182,639

==The main discussion== The current Mrs. Nussle is a typical right-wing Republican slut with a trophy husband. Neo-pagan finds this offensive to his neo-pagan anti-Christian, spit on the Ten Commandments sensibilities.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,186,164

` I have changed around the article quite a bit and removed some info from ``Giggle Loop``. If somebody wants to add it back then go ahead but I thought it was unnecessary. `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,206,660

I will not tollerate any kind of Anti-Romanian discrimination on my page. I will delete any form of Anti-Romanian edits made here.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,210,183

==Stop it!== Stop it right now! Continuing you will only help the anti-romanian users. I will revert your work.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,210,455

== Cleanup notice == I've removed this notice because I don't think this article needs it anymore. If I've oversteped my bounds on this then I apologize. ( )

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

42,211,680

==Anti-Romanian== How do you combat Anti-Romanian edits from Wikipedia? There are several users that enjoy having Anti-Romanian edits. They keep attacking some Romanian related pages by edits that may be considered as Anti-Romanian one.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,212,956

==Cool man, just cool!==

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,218,890

:Like if you were from Switzerland (I'm thinking the French part dont know if he was from Stelzenstrasse 4, CH-8152 Glattbrugg,Zurich!!!!

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,219,768

==Music Video Table== I thought I'd do a music video table seen as the Guns N' Roses page has one. Note the 'All Apologies' video although from 'Unplugged' was in fact released as promotional video for the In Utero single. Likewise the Aneurysm video is taken from 'Live Tonight Sold Out' but was in fact released as a promo video for 'From The Muddy Banks of The Wishkha'. The other two unplugged songs were also released as VHS promos for Unplugged.

2,006

false

article

random

test

false

42,221,973

==Move pages== It has been suggested to move Guantanamo Bay to the correct spelling of Guantánamo Bay and create an own article for U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay.

2,006

true

article

random

dev

false

42,224,714

` == Khwarizmi being Persian: Original research, which has nothing to do with Wikipedia == Let's look into the Persians' claims, shall we? Zmmz lists Merriam-Webster with this quote: ``Function: biographical name circa 780-circa 850 Muhammad ibn MusA al-KhwArizmI Islamic (Persian-born) mathematician & astronomer; one of the greatest scientific minds of Islam; source of much of mathematical knowledge of medieval Europe``. Notice, it says ``Persian-born`` in parantheses, and gives Islamic as the nationality. Basically, they defined him by religion and stated his place of birth. He was born in Khwarizm, in the Khorasan province. At the time of his birth, it was part of the Arab Islamic Caliphate, now it's part of the Uzbegistan nation-state. Alas, Persians burnt us saying that it's in fact Persian, so let's take it as Persian. Now, according to sources cited by Heja Helwada, Khorasan in general had a huge Arab population. In accordance to that, defining him as Persian simply because he was born in Khorasan, is not only disputed at best, it also constitutes OR(original research) which is against Wiki's policy, see: WP:NOR A troll showed up lately and claimed that Arabs are fighting a losing battle, I'm not sure we're in a battle-field here, but I got the gist: he thinks we have no sources...poor little guy! Sources that state he's explicitly an Arab: http://www.bartleby.com/65/al/AlKhowar.html http://uk.encarta.msn.com/text_761560322___0/Khwarizmi_al-.html http://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-9311992 Who's losing the ``battle`` now, I wonder? `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,226,379

Woop is used if w00t is needed to be expresed sarcastically, atleast, that's the way it is with the people I speak to.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,231,754

==Romanian language== Romanian language is spoken about 26-30 millions people in the world. It is not spoken only in Romania I hope you do realize this?! If in the articles it is written that in one country is one language (e.g. Romanian for Romania and Moldovan language for Moldova) then it's a false and must be corrected. You have to understand this. There are 3 things that may cover the truth: 1. indifference 2. escapism 3. ... till next time if ever.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,238,139

` Sources that his father was Magi? He himself was a Sunni Muslim(it's not debated)...weird, no? Actually, your logic says that everyone who wrote in Arabic is under suspicion of being a Persian untill proven otherwise, is self-contradictory. I'm an Arab, is my ethnicity under suspicion because I talk, write, and think in Arabic? Very self-contradictory indeed. Also, what's this about there being no debate about him being Persian? Who are these ``informed Islamic scholars``? Their names? Sources where they said that he was Persian? Give me tangible proof...untill then, he's obviously an Arab by the bulk of evidence and sources I gave. `

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

42,240,608

==Bishon== nonsense? excuse me, but i think goro has an unbelievible importance to our society. While, On the other hand, neither you nor your webpage seem to, peasant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • 20:28, 4 March 2006.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

42,246,210

:::I will not censor my opinions—especially not for the sake of dictatorships!

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

42,253,351

== CCDs == the technology may be dead, but did it spawn Charged coupled devices? formally known as charged bubble devices? Charge-coupled_device#History - this need to be checked out by a self proclamed expert.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

42,261,818

(probably more by now)

2,006

false

article

blocked

test

false

42,264,475

==What exactly is the problem?== The statement was accurate in it's entirety, and the people contacted were a small part of those affected. Why do you think this is inappropriate?

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,264,580

`. You may find other people changing the introduction in astonished disbelief of the ``pine waves`` story. A little repetition never hurt, especially since it gives a chance to add your information about the different Kanji pictograms. -It should be agreeable to everybody that possibly useful information (correction of popular misconceptions) should not be removed from a public encyclopedia. Doing that might be considered vandalism and I may have to complain to more senior Wikipedians. -At least try to keep your edits clean if you must continue reversing my additions. This last time you left off the period in the introduction and left the ``Notes`` header unused, in addition to your first reversal that makes your changes look more like vandalism. You'll note that I look back at my edits and correct typos`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,265,049

==Your userpage was briefly delisted by a rogue admin== You have a userbox Template:User UN which links your userpage to United Nations Wikipedians. There is currently a movement to ban userboxes from Wikipedia which are shared and which create Lists of Wikipedians. Certain admins have taken it upon themselves to preemptively sabotage and/or delete such categories and template. Here is the incident report which reported damage to yours, in which hundreds of userpages were delinked from categories without the users' knowledge. They have been stopped, barely, and the damage reverted— for now. There is a Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll, which if passed, will make required by policy the damage done to categories and templates such as User UN/United Nations Wikipedians. If you do not want this to happen, I urge you to vote Oppose. in the poll. Support is currently running at about 66%, and your vote could make the difference. It is said to require 75%-80% to be deemed reflective of consensus. Thank you,

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

42,267,890

:I did not use a bot. I contacted one-by-one a list of people who were affected by a recent wrongful action. I did not attack anyone personally, except to characterize their actions as rogue, which they were. Finally, I am entitled to speak with as many people as I like on a matter of common interest. Please lift this block immediately.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,274,648

==I'm back== Cheers, mate

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,276,545

(second level warning) >

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

42,288,436

*Probably the best bet would be to subst them and simply copy article text. I'll perform a subst really quickly to make this easier for you. (Alternatively, you could located all of the templates used, and copy over the text that way, but I think that's more trouble than it's worth.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

42,288,677

:Actually, looks like it got deleted before I could finish there. What templates where you using?

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

42,288,938

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,294,848

because I am a huge asshole

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,295,475

` == Questions == If they were a Basque band, how could they be considered influential on ``Hispanic`` Punk? Even if they were influential on Spanish Punk, the term ``Hispanic`` refers to Mestizo Latin American culture usually, so a Spanish, let alone Basque, band should not be credited under that term.`

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,297,973

So StarForce will indeed bring some balance. ::

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

42,298,685

== Yes, to oppose is pro-userbox == The proposal has the consequences of, * doing away with categories of Wikipedians by POV * preventing the common listing of userboxes in a directory * preventing userbox templates deemed not of benefit to creating an encyclopaedia, a messy criterion * preventing userbox templates deemed POV or advocacy, a messy criterion * the pro UN template and category would likely be deleted Please read the proposal for more, but, yes, to oppose is pro-userbox. BTW, I was blocked for telling you (and 43 other UN Wikipedians) this, but one wonders how else you would have learned of this. =) Tell more people, few know,

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,299,709

===March 2006=== Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

42,301,372

:*OK, I'll see about helping you out with those shortly. I won't be able to do that for a few hours, but I will try and get back to you as soon as possible.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,309,827

Copyright issues? There looks like there are copyright issues with this article, but I'm still a newbie, and am really not confortable yet with the instructions here, so I'm just going to add the sources, and ask that someone else look this over to see if I really did spot a issue. Thanks

2,006

false

article

random

dev

false

42,309,884

== United State Libertarian Party Link == What does Mr. Bell have to do with the US LP? :

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,313,136

:You all ignore the fact that the participants are mostly of those who have an ax to grind regarding userboxes, a self-selected audience. If I had wanted to stuff the ballot, I could have laid in hundreds of notes to polarized user groups from random ips, instead, I spoke to 40-or-so by hand of a fairly neutral group who were directly affected by this ridiculous proposal. :Also, citing an arbcom ruling rather than policy shows how contrived this is. Mindspillage asked me to reconsider, he said nothing about policy or blocking. How can you say inviting participants to a Wikipedia-wide issue is disruptive? How can you say that I should somehow have known that? The real question is, why is this thing not on the main page? The answer is, because most would oppose it, but the anti-userbox admins think they know what is best, and are pulling every trick they can to cram this through. :If you want to design either a jury-pool process or a general election process to decide such things, I'll be happy to help you. :How is this a personal attack, except to note that the mass blanking happened and the perpetrator is documented? Face it, the ban came only because what I said is unpopular with admins. MarkSweep made hundreds of blanking edits using admin tools, speciously twisted rules into knots and disrupted hundreds of users. He got a slap on the wrist, and polite applause. I've received notes from admins on this page threatening me for suggesting that his actions constitute vandalism, which they clearly do. I pass a note pointing this out to a small subset of the hundreds of users affected, I am banned for 31 hours. How is this not political? Now I'm afraid to contact my own friends here, whom I know to be against this, but do not know about it. :Tacky? Pretending this proposal is put before a representative audience is tacky, as is the slash-and-burn approach taken in the first place, as is the attempts by MarkSweep to fit me with a gag until the end of UPP (that is REALLY tacky), as is the naked political calculation on my AN/I as to how this speaks for their pet proposal, and how it should be played. The fact is that this proposal will never have community assent because of its deep flaws, and I am resented for pointing this out. Tacky is pretending in the face of all evidence that there is a basis for consensus here. :

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,313,795

Oh, I see I've been blocked again. Mindspillage's statement is in part patently false: yes, I do not believe I did anything wrong, no I did not indicate in any way I would continue to do so. I was unblocked for several hours and did not do so. Common decency indicates the block should be lifted, or am I simply being punished for my views?

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,314,801

:I believe that the guidelines were printed in the September-October 1993 issue of the Earth First! Journal, as part of the article that announced the creation of the ELF. As far as I know that article is not online. They were listed on The ELF website, which was run by the NAELFPO, under a statement that said anyone could commit an action on behalf of the ELF as long as they adhered to the guidelines. 8:11, 5 March 2006(UTC)

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

42,316,955

* I agree with pm_shef, (lets celebrate, we agree on something!) Mario Racco’s name should stay up on here, the fact of the matter is he filed nomination papers and then withdrawn. I would like to put up an explanation why he did this but we do need some reference. It is speculative why he did this although I again agree with pm_shef when he made the assumption it was to draw funds out of his municipal campaign fund, which seems like a reasonable reason to me. I don’t know what the laws are on putting your name in for nomination while holding other office. But this now seems to be a common practice here in Vaughan for example, Alan Shefman put his name in to run municipally in 2004 by-election (Councillor) while still holding another municipally elected position (school trustee), Susan Kadis did a similar thing in 2004 as well, running federally while still holding municipal office and Racco also did it in 2003 when he ran provincially while still holding municipal office. I do have to say this practice may be legal but I see it as unethical. The most ethical way for candidates to deal with this situation is what Oliva Chow did (in Toronto), she actually resigned her municipal councillor position prior to running for federal office.

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,329,778

2006 (UTC)d ::It doesn't matter, it's all lopsided and squashed, that is what is important!! 11:33, 5 March

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,332,398

Suck my greasy dick, I will start creating thousands of pages using different names and you can eat the corn out of my shit if you like. I can create far more than you can ever delete. I will use various screennames, various site titles, and all so don't fuck with me you split lip bitch.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

42,332,429

== eat my shit == Title says it all.

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

true

42,337,635

` The table is based on the ridiculous claims of the fascist SDA party, thus that is why called it fascist. I do not say that you are a fascist, but that you use information from fascist sources. Serbia-Montenegro was not a side in YOUR war, thus that warsion of table is totally ridiculous and wrong. It was a CIVIL war between 3 peoples of the country. Furthermore, Serbia-Montenegro was formed in 2003, thus we cannot speak about it in 1992-1995. Its predecesor, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, only supported one of the sides in the war, but it was not directly involved in it. Milosevic did not signed the Dazton agreement in the name of FRZ, but in the name of the Republika Srpska. It is a big difference. `

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

42,337,738

(Nathanrdotcom,, Tawker, Ryan Delaney, Theresa knott, FireFox)

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,339,418

::::: Maybe they ARE on drugs. I don't know. Have fun at Uncyclopedia.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

true

42,339,992

It's locked, for why I have no idea. There was hardly even any revert war. Maybe someone wanted to lock it in place in a dubious state. Uncrediwikia... SHEESH!!! )

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,340,266

And thinking more about Fahrenheit451's comment. OSA collaborator? LOL! Maybe Fahrenheit451 is an Office of Psychiatric Affairs collaborator tasked to disrupt Wikipedia and harass editors who disagree with the kook line. My guess is as good as his.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,348,894

: Well - say why and suggest what could be better.

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

42,352,341

Not the same person== Stop changing it to your opinions. Claude Speed and Claude are not the same thing. I'm editing it. Stupid pimple faced kids.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

true

42,354,537

== Anal sex == I am gay and actively engage in anal sex most nights. it doesnt hurt so whats wrong with it?

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,357,667

:Ok, I disambiguated.

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

42,371,246

==Little Eichmanns?== He calls the people who were killed on 9/11 little eichmanns? This is a seriously evil man. What if your own mother was killed in 9/11. Would you label her a 'little eichmann'?

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,372,220

`Things you should know about Wikipedia * There's always people who are going to take an overactive interest in your talk page and change it to fit what they want it to say...these people have no life. * Some administrators will lecture you as if you're their own kid...ignore them...that's what I do. * Saying somebody has a ``hard on`` for your talk page can get you blocked. But when other people come to your defense in the situation...you really only end up being blocked for 15 minutes. `

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,373,551

` == Vandalism == Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]] `

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

42,375,315

` On another point, the article includes a quote of Rawat's supposedly drawn from his first website: In an article named Journey that he published in his personal website on January 1999, Prem Rawat writes about this apparent contradiction: People through the years have tried to place me in a mold, and from the very early years I have not been able to oblige them. When I was very young, people were looking for the ``old silver-haired Guru with flowing white robes.`` I was only eight. When people were flocking to India for their search, I was in the West. When people were looking for sophisticated discourses, I spoke of simple things. When people wanted nirvana, I said, ``You need peace.`` When people said, ``Tell us of the scriptures,`` I said, ``Look within you.`` When people asked, ``What is your qualification?`` I said, ``Judge me by what I offer.`` To this day, some people see me the way they want to. After all, I guess it is rather inconvenient to see things as they really are. I have evolved, but my message stays the same. Externally, I have changed but within me, something stays the same. In that same article Rawat states that people wanted to see him as a figurehead and as a leader but that he does not want to be one or the other, and that all he wanted to do is speak to those who wanted to hear him, and impart the Knowledge to those that sought it. He also said that if people like what is given, to practice it and if not, to leave it.[14] However, the attribution link takes one to Rawat's current site instead. If there is no proper attribution here, this passage should be deleted, no? `

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,377,327

== A friendly notice about Edit Summaries == Please can you considering using Edit Summaries? It's optional, but looking at a page like this it just shows lots of edits and it's difficult to track who is doing what. Thanks for the understanding. His Imposingness, the Grand Moff

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

42,386,528

==what if i don't want to?

2,006

false

user

blocked

train

false

42,392,025

` == Wikiportal:Ukraine == I like it! One question: you mentioned boards on my talk page... where are they? :Just look at several windows at the portal. In one window at the right-hand side you will see ``new article announcement board`` and ``Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board``. Also, use Portal's own talk page to discuss portal itself. Add all these to your watchlist. Feel free to update any window and, especially, current news. Finally, don't be afraid to screw up. Anything can be easily reverted by you or anyone else. Regards, July 7, 2005 05:33 (UTC) See Wikipedia talk:Wikiportal/Ukraine re double edit. 7 July 2005 06:46 (UTC). == Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine == I also very well understand what is behind your editings and would like to remind you that Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine. Any wrong information should be removed from the articles and, be sure, it will be removed. This my positive contribution to the Wikipedia. It improves the quality of the resource, because wrong information is much worse than lack of information. If you are not agree and would like put the information back, please folow the Wikipedia_official_policy and cite a cite credible sources. Switch yourself to a constructive work, it will help you to find mutural understanding with most of Wikipedians, including myself. ::Couldn't agree more... You both must really have guts to say this. I mean that's funny who's talking about propaganda machine. ::Well, it simply seems that providing no sources when asked to is nothing uncommon in your modus operandi. Or am I wrong? (BTW, no offence intended, just a friendly note). Halibutt, you may turn this into an ethics dispute if you want. I would only welcome you or this fellow to start an RfC against me to expose your unsourced POV pushing and my attempt to resist that to which you respond with personal attacks. As for your ``no offence``, I take everything you said at the face value and I am capable to figure out your intentions from what you say rather than from what you claim you are saying. ::I merely pointed to the fact that, apparently, I'm not the only person to ask you for sources - as politely as I could - and not the onbly person you ignored, contrary to the good ol' Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Cite sources rules. If you take it as an offence - I can't do much about it, can I. Halibutt, how many times do I have to say that this is not about sources. This is about the liberty you take to interprete them and derive conclusions you favor that are just not there. And never have I ``ignored``. If you refuse to see the answers repeated so many times, I can't do much about it, can I? We can only wait for others to agree or disagree whether the answers to your and my conserns are adequate. Those ``others`` didn't show up for a while. Still no reason to beleive that the dispute was somehow solved by itself. As for your claimed ``politeness`` the article's talk page speaks for that. But as for ``offence``, if I were so easily offended, I would not be able to be at Wikipedia. We all have seen worse than that. It is not for thin-skinned to edit history articles. You should see AndriyK's language he used and even that didn't make me loose my sleep. ==Ru Pravda== Dear Irpen! Sorry if I chose the wrong words for expressing my frustration with AndriyK's behavior. I didn't mean to hurt anybody's feelings. It's just that I've seen a lot of stuff done to a few of my articles that deal with Ukraine's people or geography in one way or another, so I decided to stay away from such topics. I appreciate your hard work in the Russian Portal! Keep it up and see you there. :If it wasn't done by AndriyK lately, it was probably done by people who aren't on WP for months. Were there any recent incidents? I would love to see more Russian editors helping at UA-portal. In fact I called for that repeatedly as well as to Polish boards. With a few exceptions we never had serious conflicts. If you can, please do contribute to Ukrainian articles. == Ukraine related topics == Irpen, I would try to support you, although my knowledge of Ukrainian history is mostly limited to Soviet schoolbooks, and discourse is mostly the imperialistic one. I like your edits better, thou I am not sure if it is the right way to weed out all the Polish names from the cities that were Polish. Would it hurt that much if we would add the third (Polish) name in the first string if they want it so badly? :No it would not always hurt. It will help in some and would hurt in some other cases. I will explain later, have to go now. Thanks ::I agree with your explanations, OK, lets go into the edit war :::Dear maffiosi, I don't think the edit war is a lasting solution. Perhaps it's time to discuss Andriy's disruptive policies at the Administrators' notice board? During his stint in the Wiki, he didn't contribute anything valuable but spelling reverts and personal attacks on other editors. May we ask to ban him? We may ask to ban him but, as I told him at his talk page, I was trying to avoid it as much as I could. He violated 3RR multiple times and I showed it to him warning that he may get banned but I never actually proceeded in listing him for banning. Besides, after 24-48 hour ban he will be back even more aggravated and will continue his crusade with even more rigor. He may also find ways to circumvent 3RR or simply stay just under it and this pain will go on. On the other hand, IMO he've done enough for the full-blown arbitration, which may result in a longer ban. If anyone would want to compile an arbitration case, I will comment on it. But as of yet, I would not start it myself. Several people are trying to talk to him and I hope he would listen. But if nothing changes, he will en up banned for sure. :I think your position is fine. Just one question, is it absolutely, positively provent that OUN authorized the Lvov pogrom and it was not a spontaneus action? If its not 100% proven, we might add some NPOV hedging, like most of the scolars believe..., etc., not just blankly link the pogrom to OUN. I agree that there are differences of opinions on this. The article provides references that support both versions and both should be mentioned. I explained that some of the sources brought up by this user are controversial but this is no reason to totally dismiss them. What I oppose is that the user simply blanks from the article a sourced version he doesn't like. == Discussion on maidanua.org == Hi, I've read that discussion with some interest. Your characterization as ``User Irpen is a very cunning, ingenious, and stubborn troll.`` (``Користувач Irpen - дуже хитрий, винахідливий і наполегливий троль.``) was especially amusing. What can I say - ці западенці зовсім з глузду з'їхали. Maybe, not all of them, but a significant proportion for sure. :Now you are in danger too ). But seriously, it just hurts. Really, I mean you probably saw what was going on in en-Wiki and had no time to interfere. I took it upon myself to deal with this and I am getting all the heat now. (. And now this slander. I tried all I can to talk to user AndriyK. I was accused in Ukrayinophobia by someone else who retracted it and we are even having a decent correspondance now. But I just don't want to leave something to which I gave so much time. Just check my recent edit history to get a clue. Well, anyway, if I stay I might need help. If you have time, just try to talk to these new people if you can't participate in editing for the lack of time. I tried and I am getting this. Michael tried too. He was not cursed (perhaps because he has an orange ribbon on his page )). Still, he was just ignored. I don't know. If this goes on, we need to engage new editors in productive editing or repell this attack. Or leave ourselves. But this is the last thing I want to do... ::I understand it was very offensive. But you shouldn't worry too much - there are always crazy people out there. And how do we know he is not paid for what he does? It may be a form of an information war strategy. Similar to specifically hired participants in popular forums, like pravda.com.ua or inosmi.ru. They often pick an active user and start dumping sh-t on him. You would be quite a natural choice. N

2,006

true

user

random

test

false

42,392,607

I have done a rough chronological order

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

42,392,796

his associates were using.

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,396,124

what is the three major sports in cleveland please send back fast i really need it from stephane from austraila

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,396,643

`::From what I gather, rollbacks can deplete a user's level of credibility with admins; considering that a rollback is the only way I know of repealing this action, I fail to see why I should be the one at the chopping block. ::Seeing that you are a ``patroller``, it is incumbent upon you to avoid stepping on people's toes; retorting with ``...I have told my logic of the move...`` is hardly an appropriate response to a blunder that you made... `

2,006

true

user

random

dev

false

42,399,896

==Seven Liberal Arts and Astrology== Dantes associations do not appear to be correct, according to this link. *the Moon resembles Grammar *Mercury may be compared to Dialectics *Venus may be compared to Rhetoric *the Sun may be compared to Arithmetic *Mars may be compared to music *Jupiter may be compared to Geometry *Saturn may be compared to Astrology

2,006

true

article

blocked

test

false

42,403,180

` :Hi, the {{AIDnom}} template is an editorial notification and therefore falls in the category of ``talk page templates``. It was designed as such and is styled with that purpose in mind. See also Template_talk:AIDnom#Talk_page_template. `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

42,405,245

-Ron, your sanity is now in question. Once again you are failing to understand that I am helping to *clear up* the story, not perpetuate it. -it is useful to those who heard the story and need some additional information. Since even my reasonable explanation of this is being ignored, I am once again disputing this article. Please do not delete contributions without going through the protocol and getting all input. I have flagged this to the Wikipedia community and I am contacting my source.

2,006

false

article

blocked

train

false

42,405,273

` :You bet your ass it's inappropriate. We don't appreciate foreigners like you referring to Avram Iancu, a national hero, as ``someone famous for killing a lot of Hungarians. - ==Political bias== I've reverted the last edits to the last version by Bogdangiusca. Obviously POV, using words like ``extremely mationalist`` and ``an affront to the Hungarian community`` have no place in an encyclopedia article whose role is to inform readers about said person, nothing more. If you have strong opinions about a politician, write them on your own website. Wikipedia can not be used for: *Praising a politician. *Providing negative propaganda about a politician. If you want to do those things, it is your right, just not here. It's not up to you to judge whether Funar's municipal modifications were ``anti-Hungarian`` or whatnot, since I can sure as hell list a whole list of anti-Romanian actions that the UDMR has done in its history. - `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,410,757

==Wrestling Arenas== I'm going to make a deal with you...I would like to only put major annual wrestling ppvs on the arena sites; it is an honor to be chosen. That is better than no mention, but not as far as I was planning to go...all 12 ppvs per year. I think that is fair.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,411,336

` Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Culture shock. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —•• EMAIL• `

2,006

true

user

random

train

false

42,414,510

==Chadbryant strikes again== This did not take long. Please go to Rec.sport.pro-wrestling. You will see that has deleted relevant information on the main page with his last edit. He hates anything to do with the South, so he deleted mention of the Tennessee-based wrestling organization, TNA. He also warned of a personal attack on the talk page by when there was none. Please document this along with the arena deletions he's made and take the appropriate action. Thank you.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,416,831

::: I laugh at Chadbryant spelling GRAMMAR wrong and urge him to find instances where my grammar, spelling, or punctuation was wrong. Furthermore, considering that we are editing sites related to professional wrestling, the definition of encyclopedic is open to interpretation. My goal is to document those arenas who have held major wrestling ppvs, especially repeat venues, as it has become an honor and tradition to host them.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,417,863

::::: Please explain how anything above is in any way a personal attack. If you are going to accuse someone of poor writing skills, than you should demonstrate you are the superior linguist. Again, I ask you for proof of poor edits on my part. Furthermore, your reverting of edits without explanation or merit is in violation of Wikipedia policy. Please, ADMIN, I ask you to provide a solution to this senselessness I have had to deal with this week because of this Wikipedian.

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,420,567

` ::: I dont see you arguement Rhobite. Facts arnt trivial and as you said below as long as they can be verified its ok to add. Are you saying these facts arnt verifiable? Also you might not want to take the literal verifiable arguement, because it would mean you better start deleting... Why dont we just say Shakepeare was born in England... why even mention stratford? Why even mention dates... My point is this what is so wrong with adding detail if detail is there to be had? Im confused where does it say in Education he had a job ``Designing and installing computerized back office`` in 1978. ???`

2,006

true

article

random

test

false

42,425,435

` == 78th Academy Awards == Please stop using edit summaries that give away the winners. [[WP:EA|E]] + at 03:48 UTC (2006-03-06) :Everyone is watching, it's not a spoiler. Oh well, if it's annoying, fine. , Monday March 6 2006 at 03:51`

2,006

true

user

blocked

dev

false

42,425,501

I won't do the edits

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,428,307

I know You dan't want Me to pass, I'm not surprised , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:15

2,006

true

user

blocked

train

false

42,428,682

` ==Forget it== :Nothing against you, but I will have to bring these edits up at any future Requestfor adminship of yours. This is something we don't want in our admins, self vanity. [[WP:EA|E]] + at 04:12 UTC (2006-03-06) I know You don't want Me to pass, I'm not surprised. You always look for negativity in Me anyways. , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:15`

2,006

true

user

blocked

test

false

42,429,609

` :Great changes - hope you don't mind mine! ε* `

2,006

true

article

blocked

train

false

42,429,669

. Honestly, that's ridiculous (in my opinion).

2,006

true

article

random

train

false

42,430,166

== Crash! == Another movie from left field. i have to ask, why did Star Wars: Episode III even got nominated. People go to see movies like those , Monday March 6 2006 at 04:30

2,006

true

article

blocked

dev

false

42,430,891

I. Why don't YOU debate first before starting an edit war?

2,006

false

user

blocked

dev

false