hll-public / README.md
docketx's picture
Card: link to the DocketX GitHub (legal-scrambler, claude-for-legal plugin)
5d688f4 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.58 kB
metadata
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
  - en
task_categories:
  - question-answering
size_categories:
  - n<1K
configs:
  - config_name: tx
    data_files: hll-0.1-tx.jsonl
tags:
  - legal
  - law
  - benchmark
  - legal-reasoning
  - texas
  - caselaw
  - evaluation
  - llm-evaluation
pretty_name: Humanity's Last Lawsuit (public split)

Humanity's Last Lawsuit — public split

Code & tools: github.com/docketx — legal-scrambler pseudonymises a case file on your own hardware before a frontier model sees it; claude-for-legal is the Claude Code plugin (docketx-open-law) that loads these datasets and checks citations against them.

Source & credit — Free Law Project / CourtListener

HLL items are authored against real appellate opinions, and part of that record comes from CourtListener. Measured on this public Texas split (115 items): 103 cite an official Texas courts URL as their source of record and 12 cite https://www.courtlistener.com directly; the DocketX opinion corpus the bank is drawn from (docketx/us-caselaw, docketx/texas-caselaw) is the Free Law Project / CourtListener bulk export of 2026-06-30. CourtListener is a project of Free Law Project — a 501(c)(3) non-profit building free public access to American law since 2010. This benchmark does not exist without that record.

Free Law Project is a non-profit, and it is worth supporting: https://free.law/donate/. If this data is useful to you, credit Free Law Project and CourtListener too, and consider going straight to the source: CourtListener runs its own API and MCP server.

The public split of HLL, a legal-reasoning benchmark built from REAL appellate opinions with the parties redacted. Each item: blinded facts + a question whose gold answer (disposition, controlling standard, authorities) is the court's actual decision — grading is fully mechanical against the source opinion; no model judges another model. The private leaderboard split is withheld.

Per-jurisdiction configs are added as each state's bank matures (Texas first; California in development on the same pipeline). Item provenance: every item carries its source docket, author and critic models, and verbatim evidence quotes from the opinion.

Built by DocketX from the public record — the same team behind the us-caselaw 51-jurisdiction series. Site: https://docketrouter.ai/hll