dwidlee/systemone-lite-0.5b
Text Generation • 0.5B • Updated • 499
Datasets:
task stringclasses 9
values | state stringlengths 195 695 | instructions stringclasses 33
values | criteria_keys listlengths 2 5 | criteria_values listlengths 2 5 | label_alias stringclasses 5
values | label_key stringclasses 22
values | meta stringlengths 80 133 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
debate.winner | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Open source is always good actually", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Competitors will steal our vibes", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Core contains proprietary scoring IP", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Support ... | Given the claims and evidence flags, who should win the debate? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 0, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "Production outage: checkout broken", "body": "Production API outage on invoices endpoint They have waited 7 days. Segment=enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 7}, "channel": "chat"} | Assign an urgency score using the listed levels. One letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"1: medium — same day",
"0: low — can wait",
"2: high — immediate"
] | C | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Competitors will steal our vibes", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Core contains proprietary scoring IP", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "question": "We should open-source ... | Which side is better supported by evidence? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.confidence | {"question": "Remote-first improves productivity", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Some customers require on-site workshops", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Offices look empty and sad", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard... | Confidence score for this adjudication — pick one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low confidence",
"1: medium confidence",
"2: high confidence"
] | A | 0 | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "score", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.needs_human | {"ticket": {"subject": "Where is the documentation?", "body": "From customer (enterprise): How do I change my display name?. SLA wait=4d priority=p2.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p2", "wait_days": 4}, "channel": "phone"} | Should a human review this before automated handling? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | A | no | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Critical path needs senior ownership now", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Ramp cost exceeds budget this half", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Juniors ask too many questions", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Senior m... | Is there enough hard evidence to decide confidently? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide",
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Design partners ask for source escrow", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "question": "We should open-source the core library", "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text":... | Apply the rubric: hard evidence beats vibes. Pick the winning side letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | A | support | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 0, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Rust is trendy on HN", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "p99 latency is 4x SLO on hot path", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text":... | Evidence sufficiency check — yes or no via option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.needs_human | {"ticket": {"subject": "How do I change my display name?", "body": "Customer says: Thanks for the help last week. Wait time so far: 10 days. Tier: enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 10}, "channel": "phone"} | Can a bot handle this safely, or must a person intervene? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)",
"no: Safe for bot / routine"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.fund_next | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 33, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 26, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Cus... | Select the next funding target under the policy. One option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"security_patch: Critical security patch (cost=33, urgency=3)",
"docs_rewrite: Docs rewrite contractor (cost=26, urgency=0)",
"customer_refund_pool: Customer refund reserve (cost=62, urgency=2)"
] | A | security_patch | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.needs_human | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "How do I change my display name?", "body": "Customer says: Is there a status page?. Wait time so far: 5 days. Tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 5}} | Human escalation required? Pick yes or no via the option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"requests": [{"id": "office_snacks", "title": "Office snacks", "cost": 7, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "design_sprint", "title": "Design sprint facilitator", "cost": 25, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 42, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop re... | Would summing all costs fit under budget_remaining? Answer with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Enterprise deals are price-sensitive this quarter", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "question": "We should raise prices 10%", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text":... | Who wins under the stated evidence policy? One Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | A | support | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.route | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "Need enterprise pricing for 200 seats", "body": "Thread summary — We need a quote for upgrading seats | wait_days=1 | tier=enterprise | priority=p2", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p2", "wait_days": 1}} | Which team should own this ticket? Reply with exactly one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking"
] | D | sales | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "sales", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "Invoice shows unexpected billing amount", "body": "Message: Billing portal shows an incorrect charge. Priority flag: p3. Account tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 9}, "channel": "email"} | Rate urgency for this ticket on the given scale. Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"1: medium — same day",
"2: high — immediate",
"0: low — can wait"
] | B | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.route | {"ticket": {"subject": "Compare Business vs Enterprise plans", "body": "Thread summary — Can sales walk us through annual pricing? | wait_days=7 | tier=free | priority=p0", "tier": "free", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 7}, "channel": "chat"} | Which team should own this ticket? Reply with exactly one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds"
] | D | sales | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "sales", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
debate.winner | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Customers asked for the fix this week", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "question": "We should deploy on Friday", "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "I just don... | Who wins under the stated evidence policy? One Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | B | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.pressure | {"requests": [{"id": "oncall_stipend", "title": "On-call stipend top-up", "cost": 44, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 71, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 47, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical secur... | Rate overall budget pressure. Reply with one level letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"1: medium — close to capacity",
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"2: high — demand exceeds budget"
] | A | 1 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 0.907185628742515, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "question": "We should deploy on Friday", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Customers asked for the fix this week", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Fridays feel lucky", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "side... | Evidence sufficiency check — yes or no via option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide",
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.route | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "Courier says package damaged", "body": "Delivery ETA keeps slipping They have waited 10 days. Segment=enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 10}} | Best team for this case? Answer with a single option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"other: unclear or general questions"
] | C | shipping | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "shipping", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
ticket.route | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "Need enterprise pricing for 200 seats", "body": "Message: Interested in enterprise pricing and a demo. Priority flag: p1. Account tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 5}} | Best team for this case? Answer with a single option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations"
] | C | sales | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "sales", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "question": "We should hire more junior engineers", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Senior mentors have spare capacity", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Internship NPS was high and conversion strong"... | Do we have sufficient evidence-backed claims (not vibes)? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | A | no | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.pressure | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Customer refund reserve", "cost": 56, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "office_snacks", "title": "Office snacks", "cost": 15, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite c... | How constrained is the budget relative to demand? Pick one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"1: medium — close to capacity"
] | C | 1 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.0491803278688525, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"question": "We should open-source the core library", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Core contains proprietary scoring IP", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Competitors will steal our vibes", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Support load estimates exceed current headcount", "hard_evidence": true... | Which side is better supported by evidence? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | B | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "On-call coverage is thin on weekends", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "I just don't like Fridays", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1"... | Which side is better supported by evidence? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | B | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.fund_next | {"requests": [{"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 123, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 77, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 62, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring re... | Pick the best request to fund now. Prefer high urgency that fits the remaining budget. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D"
] | [
"cdn_upgrade: CDN capacity upgrade (cost=62, urgency=2)",
"hiring_bonus: Hiring referral bonuses (cost=57, urgency=1)",
"marketing_campaign: Q3 marketing campaign (cost=123, urgency=1)",
"compliance_audit: Compliance audit support (cost=77, urgency=3)"
] | D | compliance_audit | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 4} |
debate.confidence | {"question": "Remote-first improves productivity", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "My friend likes remote", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Hiring pipeline widened internationally", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Attrition dropped 20% after remote policy", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {... | Confidence score for this adjudication — pick one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"0: low confidence",
"2: high confidence"
] | A | 0 | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "score", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "General question about account", "body": "Thread summary — Thanks for the help last week | wait_days=5 | tier=free | priority=p3", "tier": "free", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 5}} | How urgent is this ticket? Pick one level letter from Criteria. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"1: medium — same day",
"0: low — can wait",
"2: high — immediate"
] | A | 1 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Rust prototype cut CPU 35% in bench", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "I dream in garbage collectors", "hard_evidence": false... | Apply the rubric: hard evidence beats vibes. Pick the winning side letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.fund_next | {"currency": "USD", "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "budget_remaining": 296, "requests": [{"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 64, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "ml_experiment", "title": "GPU hours for ML experiment", "cost": 90, "urgenc... | Given budget_remaining and urgencies, which request wins? One letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"marketing_campaign: Q3 marketing campaign (cost=129, urgency=1)",
"ml_experiment: GPU hours for ML experiment (cost=90, urgency=1)",
"compliance_audit: Compliance audit support (cost=64, urgency=3)"
] | C | compliance_audit | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
alloc.pressure | {"currency": "USD", "budget_remaining": 118, "requests": [{"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring referral bonuses", "cost": 59, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Customer refund reserve", "cost": 63, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 90, "urgency"... | Budget tightness score — choose one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.7966101694915255, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.needs_human | {"ticket": {"subject": "General question about account", "body": "Thread summary — How do I change my display name? | wait_days=7 | tier=enterprise | priority=p1", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 7}, "channel": "email"} | Human escalation required? Pick yes or no via the option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)",
"no: Safe for bot / routine"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.pressure | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring referral bonuses", "cost": 47, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Customer refund reserve", "cost": 60, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "C... | How constrained is the budget relative to demand? Pick one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"1: medium — close to capacity"
] | B | 2 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.268041237113402, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
alloc.fund_next | {"requests": [{"id": "oncall_stipend", "title": "On-call stipend top-up", "cost": 54, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 40, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "office_snacks", "title": "Office snacks", "cost": 17, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit su... | Given budget_remaining and urgencies, which request wins? One letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D"
] | [
"oncall_stipend: On-call stipend top-up (cost=54, urgency=2)",
"docs_rewrite: Docs rewrite contractor (cost=40, urgency=0)",
"office_snacks: Office snacks (cost=17, urgency=0)",
"compliance_audit: Compliance audit support (cost=76, urgency=3)"
] | D | compliance_audit | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 4} |
ticket.route | {"ticket": {"subject": "Invoice shows unexpected billing amount", "body": "Message: Billing portal shows an incorrect charge. Priority flag: p1. Account tier: enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 5}, "channel": "phone"} | Choose the owning queue from Criteria. One letter only. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations",
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds"
] | E | billing | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "billing", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
debate.winner | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "On-call coverage is thin on weekends", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Fridays feel lucky", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Customers asked for the f... | Given the claims and evidence flags, who should win the debate? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | A | support | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 2, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.confidence | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Fridays feel lucky", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Staging tests are green", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Customers asked for the fix this week", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1"... | Confidence score for this adjudication — pick one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low confidence",
"1: medium confidence",
"2: high confidence"
] | A | 0 | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "score", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.needs_human | {"ticket": {"subject": "Invoice shows unexpected billing amount", "body": "Billing portal shows an incorrect charge They have waited 5 days. Segment=free.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 5}, "channel": "email"} | Can a bot handle this safely, or must a person intervene? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)",
"no: Safe for bot / routine"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "General question about account", "body": "Customer says: How do I change my display name?. Wait time so far: 9 days. Tier: enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 9}, "channel": "phone"} | Urgency classification — choose exactly one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — immediate",
"0: low — can wait",
"1: medium — same day"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "Need enterprise pricing for 200 seats", "body": "From customer (pro): Can sales walk us through annual pricing?. SLA wait=3d priority=p0.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 3}} | Urgency classification — choose exactly one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — immediate",
"1: medium — same day",
"0: low — can wait"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.needs_human | {"channel": "phone", "ticket": {"subject": "General question about account", "body": "Thread summary — Where can I find documentation? | wait_days=1 | tier=pro | priority=p0", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 1}} | Does this ticket need a human agent (not a bot)? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "On-call coverage is thin on weekends", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "I just don't like Fridays", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Customers asked fo... | Is there enough hard evidence to decide confidently? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | A | no | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"currency": "USD", "budget_remaining": 199, "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 26, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 48, "urgency": 2}, {"id":... | Is the budget enough to approve every request? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | A | no | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Support load estimates exceed current headcount", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Competitors will steal our vibes", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Core contains pr... | Given the claims and evidence flags, who should win the debate? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 2, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "Courier says package damaged", "body": "Package marked delivered but nothing arrived They have waited 3 days. Segment=enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p2", "wait_days": 3}, "channel": "phone"} | How urgent is this ticket? Pick one level letter from Criteria. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — immediate",
"0: low — can wait",
"1: medium — same day"
] | C | 1 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Competitors will steal our vibes", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Support load estimates exceed current headcount", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_a": {"label": "sup... | Do we have sufficient evidence-backed claims (not vibes)? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | A | no | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.needs_human | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "Charged twice for the same invoice A-926", "body": "Message: I was charged twice and want a refund immediately. Priority flag: p1. Account tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 8}} | Can a bot handle this safely, or must a person intervene? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "I just don't like Fridays", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "On-call coverage is thin on weekends", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Staging tests are ... | Is there enough hard evidence to decide confidently? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide",
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "General question about account", "body": "Message: How do I change my display name?. Priority flag: p1. Account tier: enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 10}} | How urgent is this ticket? Pick one level letter from Criteria. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"1: medium — same day",
"2: high — immediate",
"0: low — can wait"
] | B | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.needs_human | {"ticket": {"subject": "Delivery marked complete but missing", "body": "From customer (free): Tracking has not moved for a week. SLA wait=2d priority=p2.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p2", "wait_days": 2}, "channel": "chat"} | Does this ticket need a human agent (not a bot)? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | A | no | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.pressure | {"requests": [{"id": "oncall_stipend", "title": "On-call stipend top-up", "cost": 50, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 48, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 39, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "design_sprint", "title": "Design sprint f... | How constrained is the budget relative to demand? Pick one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"1: medium — close to capacity"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.6028368794326242, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Open source is always good actually", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Inbound PRs already fix bugs we lack time for", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Support load estimates exceed current headcount", "hard_evidence": tr... | Which side is better supported by evidence? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | B | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.route | {"ticket": {"subject": "Package stuck in transit for 2 days", "body": "Message: Tracking has not moved for a week. Priority flag: p3. Account tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 2}, "channel": "email"} | Which team should own this ticket? Reply with exactly one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations"
] | B | shipping | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "shipping", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
alloc.pressure | {"currency": "USD", "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Customer refund reserve", "cost": 55, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 67, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "hiring... | How constrained is the budget relative to demand? Pick one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"1: medium — close to capacity"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.2953367875647668, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
alloc.fund_next | {"currency": "USD", "requests": [{"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 42, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 79, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 56, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "marketing_campaign", ... | Which single request should be funded next given the budget? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"laptop_refresh: Engineer laptop refresh (cost=79, urgency=1)",
"security_patch: Critical security patch (cost=42, urgency=3)",
"customer_refund_pool: Customer refund reserve (cost=59, urgency=2)",
"cdn_upgrade: CDN capacity upgrade (cost=56, urgency=2)",
"marketing_campaign: Q3 marketing campaign (cost=125... | B | security_patch | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
ticket.needs_human | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "Need enterprise pricing for 200 seats", "body": "Message: Interested in enterprise pricing and a demo. Priority flag: p3. Account tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 6}} | Human escalation required? Pick yes or no via the option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "How do I change my display name?", "body": "Thread summary — Where can I find documentation? | wait_days=6 | tier=enterprise | priority=p3", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 6}} | How urgent is this ticket? Pick one level letter from Criteria. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — can wait",
"1: medium — same day",
"2: high — immediate"
] | C | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"question": "Remote-first improves productivity", "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Some customers require on-site workshops", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Offices look empty and sad", "hard_evidence... | Given the claims and evidence flags, who should win the debate? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | B | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "Where is my shipment A-606?", "body": "Thread summary — Package marked delivered but nothing arrived | wait_days=9 | tier=pro | priority=p2", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p2", "wait_days": 9}} | Assign an urgency score using the listed levels. One letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — immediate",
"1: medium — same day",
"0: low — can wait"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Juniors are cheaper vibes", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "question": "We should hire more junior engineers", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Ramp cost e... | Who wins under the stated evidence policy? One Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 0, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.needs_human | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "How do I change my display name?", "body": "Thread summary — How do I change my display name? | wait_days=10 | tier=free | priority=p3", "tier": "free", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 10}} | Does this ticket need a human agent (not a bot)? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.pressure | {"requests": [{"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring referral bonuses", "cost": 58, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 125, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 45, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "design_sprint", "title": "Design sprint... | Rate overall budget pressure. Reply with one level letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"1: medium — close to capacity"
] | B | 2 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.5576923076923077, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.route | {"ticket": {"subject": "How do I change my display name?", "body": "From customer (free): How do I change my display name?. SLA wait=6d priority=p0.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 6}, "channel": "chat"} | Best team for this case? Answer with a single option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds"
] | B | other | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "other", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Staging tests are green", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Fridays feel lucky", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Customers asked for the fix this week", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1"... | Is there enough hard evidence to decide confidently? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide",
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Design partners ask for source escrow", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Core contains proprietary scoring IP", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Competitors will steal our vibes", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Support... | Is there enough hard evidence to decide confidently? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide",
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.fund_next | {"requests": [{"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 125, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 85, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 67, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hir... | Pick the best request to fund now. Prefer high urgency that fits the remaining budget. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D"
] | [
"compliance_audit: Compliance audit support (cost=67, urgency=3)",
"hiring_bonus: Hiring referral bonuses (cost=56, urgency=1)",
"marketing_campaign: Q3 marketing campaign (cost=125, urgency=1)",
"laptop_refresh: Engineer laptop refresh (cost=85, urgency=1)"
] | A | compliance_audit | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 4} |
alloc.fund_next | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "budget_remaining": 162, "requests": [{"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Customer refund reserve", "cost": 70, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "ml_experiment", "title": "GPU hours for ML experiment", "cost": 86, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "... | Given budget_remaining and urgencies, which request wins? One letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D"
] | [
"cdn_upgrade: CDN capacity upgrade (cost=58, urgency=2)",
"ml_experiment: GPU hours for ML experiment (cost=86, urgency=1)",
"compliance_audit: Compliance audit support (cost=76, urgency=3)",
"customer_refund_pool: Customer refund reserve (cost=70, urgency=2)"
] | C | compliance_audit | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 4} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "Charged twice for the same invoice A-541", "body": "Please reverse the duplicate payment They have waited 0 days. Segment=free.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 0}, "channel": "phone"} | How urgent is this ticket? Pick one level letter from Criteria. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — can wait",
"2: high — immediate",
"1: medium — same day"
] | C | 1 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"currency": "USD", "budget_remaining": 333, "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring referral bonuses", "cost": 53, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 113, "urgency": 1... | Can we fund ALL remaining requests within the budget? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "email", "ticket": {"subject": "Cannot log in after password reset", "body": "Customer says: The app crashes every time I open settings. Wait time so far: 0 days. Tier: pro.", "tier": "pro", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 0}} | Rate urgency for this ticket on the given scale. Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — can wait",
"1: medium — same day",
"2: high — immediate"
] | B | 1 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "On-call coverage is thin on weekends", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_a": {"label": "support", "cla... | Evidence sufficiency check — yes or no via option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"question": "We should rewrite the backend in Rust", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "I dream in garbage collectors", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "p99 latency is 4x SLO on hot path", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Rust prototype cut CPU 35% in benc... | Given the claims and evidence flags, who should win the debate? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | A | support | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 2, "con_ev": 0, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.pressure | {"budget_remaining": 140, "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "currency": "USD", "requests": [{"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 69, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 28, "urgency": 0... | How constrained is the budget relative to demand? Pick one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high — demand exceeds budget",
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"1: medium — close to capacity"
] | A | 2 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 1.9, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Some customers require on-site workshops", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Hiring pipeline widened internationally", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Attrition dropped 20% after remote policy", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "... | Who wins under the stated evidence policy? One Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | A | support | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 2, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "p99 latency is 4x SLO on hot path", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Rewrite estimated at 2 quarters with feature freeze", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side wit... | Evidence sufficiency check — yes or no via option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | A | no | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "App crashes when opening settings", "body": "The app crashes every time I open settings They have waited 5 days. Segment=enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 5}, "channel": "chat"} | Urgency classification — choose exactly one Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — can wait",
"2: high — immediate",
"1: medium — same day"
] | B | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
ticket.route | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "Delivery marked complete but missing", "body": "From customer (enterprise): Package marked delivered but nothing arrived. SLA wait=2d priority=p1.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 2}} | Which team should own this ticket? Reply with exactly one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations"
] | B | shipping | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "shipping", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"currency": "USD", "budget_remaining": 232, "requests": [{"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 81, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 36, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "oncall_stipend", "title": "On-call stipend top-up", "cost": 54, "urgency": 2}, {... | Can we fund ALL remaining requests within the budget? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | A | no | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"budget_remaining": 253, "requests": [{"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 62, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring referral bonuses", "cost": 58, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "ml_experiment", "title": "GPU hours for ML experiment", "cost": 84, "urgency": 1}], "policy": "Fund at mo... | Is the budget enough to approve every request? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs",
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"question": "Remote-first improves productivity", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "My friend likes remote", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Attrition dropped 20% after remote policy", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard e... | Which side is better supported by evidence? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.enough_evidence | {"side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Juniors are cheaper vibes", "hard_evidence": false}]}, "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "Ramp cost exceeds budget this half", "hard_evidence": true}]}, ... | Is there enough hard evidence to decide confidently? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Too thin or tied — needs more evidence",
"yes: Enough hard evidence to decide"
] | A | no | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "currency": "USD", "requests": [{"id": "design_sprint", "title": "Design sprint facilitator", "cost": 28, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 53, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "office_snacks", "tit... | Would summing all costs fit under budget_remaining? Answer with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.route | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "Thanks — just saying hello", "body": "Customer says: Is there a status page?. Wait time so far: 9 days. Tier: free.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p1", "wait_days": 9}} | Which team should own this ticket? Reply with exactly one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations"
] | B | other | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "other", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
ticket.needs_human | {"ticket": {"subject": "Compare Business vs Enterprise plans", "body": "Message: We need a quote for upgrading seats. Priority flag: p3. Account tier: enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 10}, "channel": "phone"} | Should a human review this before automated handling? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Safe for bot / routine",
"yes: Needs a human (money, legal, anger, long wait, outage)"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"requests": [{"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 31, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "customer_refund_pool", "title": "Customer refund reserve", "cost": 53, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "ml_experiment", "title": "GPU hours for ML experiment", "cost": 94, "urgency": 1}], "currency": "USD", "budget_remaini... | Would summing all costs fit under budget_remaining? Answer with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"channel": "chat", "ticket": {"subject": "Invoice shows unexpected billing amount", "body": "Message: I was charged twice and want a refund immediately. Priority flag: p3. Account tier: enterprise.", "tier": "enterprise", "priority": "p3", "wait_days": 9}} | Rate urgency for this ticket on the given scale. Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"1: medium — same day",
"2: high — immediate",
"0: low — can wait"
] | B | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
alloc.pressure | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "currency": "USD", "requests": [{"id": "office_snacks", "title": "Office snacks", "cost": 15, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 40, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title"... | How constrained is the budget relative to demand? Pick one letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — budget comfortably covers demand",
"1: medium — close to capacity",
"2: high — demand exceeds budget"
] | B | 1 | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "score", "ratio": 0.8449612403100775, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"requests": [{"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 82, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 121, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 41, "urgency": 0}], "budget_remaining": 147, "currency": "US... | Is the budget enough to approve every request? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | A | no | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"budget_remaining": 324, "requests": [{"id": "oncall_stipend", "title": "On-call stipend top-up", "cost": 39, "urgency": 2}, {"id": "ml_experiment", "title": "GPU hours for ML experiment", "cost": 98, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 123, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "desi... | Would summing all costs fit under budget_remaining? Answer with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"budget_remaining": 224, "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "currency": "USD", "requests": [{"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 42, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 82, "urgency": 1}... | Would summing all costs fit under budget_remaining? Answer with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | A | no | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"requests": [{"id": "office_snacks", "title": "Office snacks", "cost": 18, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "marketing_campaign", "title": "Q3 marketing campaign", "cost": 118, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "hiring_bonus", "title": "Hiring referral bonuses", "cost": 44, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "ml_experiment", "title": "GPU hours for ML e... | Is the budget enough to approve every request? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"budget_remaining": 326, "policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "requests": [{"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 78, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "docs_rewrite", "title": "Docs rewrite contractor", "cost": 40, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "design_s... | Can we fund ALL remaining requests within the budget? Reply with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs",
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"policy": "Fund at most one request per step; prefer higher urgency among affordable.", "currency": "USD", "budget_remaining": 307, "requests": [{"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit support", "cost": 68, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "cdn_upgrade", "title": "CDN capacity upgrade", "cost": 59, "urgency": 2}, {... | Would summing all costs fit under budget_remaining? Answer with one letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests",
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs"
] | B | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
alloc.can_fund_all | {"requests": [{"id": "security_patch", "title": "Critical security patch", "cost": 37, "urgency": 3}, {"id": "office_snacks", "title": "Office snacks", "cost": 14, "urgency": 0}, {"id": "laptop_refresh", "title": "Engineer laptop refresh", "cost": 78, "urgency": 1}, {"id": "compliance_audit", "title": "Compliance audit... | Is the budget enough to approve every request? Reply with one option letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"yes: Budget covers the sum of all request costs",
"no: Budget is insufficient for all requests"
] | A | yes | {"gym": "resource_allocator", "schema_hint": "noul", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.winner | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Rust is trendy on HN", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "p99 latency is 4x SLO on hot path", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Rust prototype cut CPU 35% in bench", "ha... | Who wins under the stated evidence policy? One Criteria letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | A | support | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 2, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
debate.confidence | {"side_b": {"label": "oppose", "claims": [{"text": "I just don't like Fridays", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Last Friday deploy caused a Sev-1", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "question": "We should deploy on Friday", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Customers asked for the fix this week", "hard_evi... | How confident should we be in the judgment? Reply with one level letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"2: high confidence",
"1: medium confidence",
"0: low confidence"
] | C | 0 | {"gym": "debate_judge", "schema_hint": "score", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
debate.winner | {"rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Open source is always good actually", "hard_evidence": false}, {"text": "Inbound PRs already fix bugs we lack time for", "hard_evidence": true}]}, "side_b": {"label": "o... | Given the claims and evidence flags, who should win the debate? One letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"support: Side A — support the proposal",
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal"
] | B | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 1, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.route | {"channel": "phone", "ticket": {"subject": "Thanks — just saying hello", "body": "Customer says: How do I change my display name?. Wait time so far: 2 days. Tier: free.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 2}} | Best team for this case? Answer with a single option letter. | [
"A",
"B",
"C",
"D",
"E"
] | [
"technical: bugs, crashes, outages, integrations",
"sales: pricing, upgrades, new accounts",
"billing: payment, charges, invoices, refunds",
"other: unclear or general questions",
"shipping: delivery, packages, tracking"
] | D | other | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "domain_seed": "other", "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 5} |
debate.winner | {"question": "We should open-source the core library", "rubric": "Prefer hard evidence over vibes; break ties toward the side with more hard evidence.", "side_a": {"label": "support", "claims": [{"text": "Design partners ask for source escrow", "hard_evidence": true}, {"text": "Open source is always good actually", "ha... | Apply the rubric: hard evidence beats vibes. Pick the winning side letter. | [
"A",
"B"
] | [
"oppose: Side B — oppose the proposal",
"support: Side A — support the proposal"
] | A | oppose | {"gym": "debate_judge", "pro_ev": 1, "con_ev": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 2} |
ticket.urgency | {"ticket": {"subject": "Interested in upgrading to Pro", "body": "Customer says: Can sales walk us through annual pricing?. Wait time so far: 3 days. Tier: free.", "tier": "free", "priority": "p0", "wait_days": 3}, "channel": "chat"} | How urgent is this ticket? Pick one level letter from Criteria. | [
"A",
"B",
"C"
] | [
"0: low — can wait",
"1: medium — same day",
"2: high — immediate"
] | C | 2 | {"gym": "ticket_dungeon", "schema_hint": "score", "urgency": 2, "schema": "choice", "hard": false, "n_options": 3} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
systemone-lite-general
Synthetic typed-decision rows for
systemone-lite
(letter-alias choice labels for causal LM SFT).
Not affiliated with TypeSafe AI / Jev. Labels are rule-based, not human prefs.
Splits
| Split | Rows | Notes |
|---|---|---|
train |
32 400 | Stratified mix of 3 gyms |
test |
3 600 | iid held-out by task |
test_hard |
5 400 | layout / paraphrase / option-subset shift |
full |
36 000 | train + iid test |
Gyms
- TicketDungeon:
ticket.route,ticket.needs_human,ticket.urgency - ResourceAllocator:
alloc.fund_next,alloc.can_fund_all,alloc.pressure - DebateJudge:
debate.winner,debate.enough_evidence,debate.confidence
Downstream numbers (same repo)
Fine-tune → dwidlee/systemone-lite-0.5b:
| Split | Base 0.5B | SFT |
|---|---|---|
test (n=3600) |
0.439 | 0.679 |
test_hard (n=5400) |
0.427 | 0.652 |
Load
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("dwidlee/systemone-lite-general")
print(ds)
- Downloads last month
- 70
Models trained or fine-tuned on dwidlee/systemone-lite-general