| --- |
| pretty_name: EventDrive |
| language: |
| - en |
| --- |
| |
| # EventDrive |
|
|
| ## EventDrive: Event Cameras for Vision-Language Driving Intelligence |
|
|
| Dongyue Lu, Rong Li, Ao Liang, Lingdong Kong, Wei Yin, Lai Xing Ng, Benoit R. Cottereau, Camille Simon Chane, and Wei Tsang Ooi |
|
|
| **CVPR 2026** |
|
|
| [Project Page](https://dylanorange.github.io/projects/eventdrive/) | [Paper](https://dylanorange.github.io/projects/eventdrive/static/files/EventDrive.pdf) | [Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/dylanorange/EventDrive) |
|
|
| EventDrive is a unified event-frame driving benchmark for vision-language driving intelligence. It combines synchronized RGB frames, event-camera data, and instruction-style annotations to study how event sensing supports multimodal perception, reasoning, prediction, and planning under diverse driving conditions. |
|
|
| The benchmark covers four dimensions: |
|
|
| - **Perception**: scene-level driving perception questions. |
| - **Understanding**: object awareness, grounding, appearance, status, and spatial-relation questions. |
| - **Prediction**: short-term behavior prediction for a highlighted dynamic agent. |
| - **Planning**: high-level driving intent and ego-trajectory prediction. |
|
|
| ## Repository Layout |
|
|
| ```text |
| . |
| ├── eventdrive_perception.tar.gz |
| ├── eventdrive_understanding.tar.gz |
| ├── eventdrive_prediction.tar.gz |
| ├── eventdrive_planning.tar.gz |
| ├── json/ |
| │ ├── perception/ |
| │ │ ├── dsec/ |
| │ │ ├── m3ed/ |
| │ │ └── pku/ |
| │ ├── understanding/ |
| │ ├── prediction/ |
| │ └── planning/ |
| └── scripts/ |
| ├── evaluation_perception.py |
| ├── evaluation_understanding.py |
| ├── evaluation_prediction.py |
| └── evaluation_planning.py |
| ``` |
|
|
| Create a `data/` directory and extract all archives from the repository root: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| mkdir -p data |
| tar -xzf eventdrive_perception.tar.gz -C data |
| tar -xzf eventdrive_understanding.tar.gz -C data |
| tar -xzf eventdrive_prediction.tar.gz -C data |
| tar -xzf eventdrive_planning.tar.gz -C data |
| ``` |
|
|
| The extracted data follows this structure: |
|
|
| ```text |
| data/ |
| ├── perception/ |
| │ ├── dsec/ |
| │ │ ├── train/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| │ │ └── test/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| │ ├── m3ed/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| │ └── pku/aps_frames_sampled/val/<condition>/<sequence>/ |
| ├── understanding/ |
| │ ├── train/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| │ └── test/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| ├── prediction/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| └── planning/<sequence>/{image,event}/ |
| ``` |
|
|
| Each `image/` directory contains RGB frames. Each `event/` directory contains the paired event-camera representation in `.npz` format. |
|
|
| For PKU perception data, paired `.png` and `.npz` files are stored side by side in each sequence directory instead of separate `image/` and `event/` directories. |
|
|
| ## Annotation Files |
|
|
| All annotation paths are relative to the repository root and start with `data/`. Run the scripts from the repository root after extracting the archives. |
|
|
| Each dimension provides train and test annotations. Files ending in `_hard.json` contain the hard test subsets. |
|
|
| The released annotations under `json/` use separate prompts for answer components such as option letter and label text, or speed and path intent. Samples originating from the same question share an `original_id`. The evaluation scripts use this field to pair component predictions before computing joint accuracy. Planning trajectory samples are evaluated independently and do not require an `original_id`. |
|
|
| A typical annotation includes paired image and event paths plus an instruction-answer conversation: |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "image": "data/perception/dsec/test/interlaken_00_a/image/000005.png", |
| "event": "data/perception/dsec/test/interlaken_00_a/event/000005.npz", |
| "category": "Scene type", |
| "original_id": "perception/dsec/dsec_test_perception.json:000000", |
| "subtask": "option_letter", |
| "conversations": [ |
| { |
| "from": "human", |
| "value": "<instruction>" |
| }, |
| { |
| "from": "gpt", |
| "value": "<ground-truth answer>" |
| } |
| ] |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| Add a `model_output` field to each sample after inference: |
|
|
| ```json |
| { |
| "model_output": "<model prediction>" |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| For understanding grounding samples, boxes use `[x, y, w, h]`, where `(x, y)` is the top-left corner and `(w, h)` is the width and height. |
|
|
| ## Evaluation |
|
|
| Install the evaluation dependencies: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| pip install numpy tqdm |
| ``` |
|
|
| Run the matching evaluator on an inference result JSON file generated from the annotations under `json/`: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| python scripts/evaluation_perception.py \ |
| --pred-json results/dsec_test_perception.json |
| |
| python scripts/evaluation_understanding.py \ |
| --pred-json results/dsec_test_understanding.json \ |
| --iou-thresh 0.6 |
| |
| python scripts/evaluation_prediction.py \ |
| --pred-json results/m3ed_test_prediction.json |
| |
| python scripts/evaluation_planning.py \ |
| --pred-json results/m3ed_test_planning.json |
| ``` |
|
|
| The evaluators write summary JSON files next to the prediction file. They also save mismatch examples for debugging when applicable. |
|
|
| Metrics: |
|
|
| - **Perception**: joint accuracy after pairing the split option-letter and label-text answers. Both answers must be correct. |
| - **Understanding**: joint QA accuracy after pairing the split option-letter and label-text answers, category-wise accuracy, grounding accuracy at the selected IoU threshold, and mean IoU. Both QA answers must be correct. The default IoU threshold is `0.6`. |
| - **Prediction**: speed accuracy, path accuracy, class-wise accuracy, and joint speed-path accuracy after pairing split answers. |
| - **Planning**: high-level speed accuracy, path accuracy, class-wise accuracy, joint speed-path accuracy after pairing split answers, and trajectory L2 error at `1s`, `3s`, and `5s`. |
|
|
| Planning trajectory predictions must contain exactly 10 `[x, y]` waypoints at 0.5-second intervals. Evaluation terminates with an error if a trajectory prediction does not follow this format. |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @InProceedings{Lu_2026_CVPR, |
| author = {Lu, Dongyue and Li, Rong and Liang, Ao and Kong, Lingdong and Yin, Wei and Ng, Lai Xing and Cottereau, Benoit R. and Chane, Camille Simon and Ooi, Wei Tsang}, |
| title = {EventDrive: Event Cameras for Vision-Language Driving Intelligence}, |
| booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|