label stringclasses 2
values | text stringlengths 165 803 |
|---|---|
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Aubrey does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Aubrey does not know whether Jeremy is thirsty. Hypothesis: Nichole can now know whether ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James does not know whether Ernestine is thirsty. Hypothesis: Maria can now know that Erne... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gabriel knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gabriel knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Gabriel can now know that someone i... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kevin knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kevin can now know that Tracie can know that nobody's forehead is ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gregory knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Gregory can now know that Chasity can know that Chasity's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mary's card is shown to Annie. Nona's card is shown to Annie. Mary's card is shown to Mary. Annie's card is shown to Nona. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Nona ... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dominic is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Rogelio can now know whether Mary can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Tina knows whether Lisa's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lisa's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Linda can now know that... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Marguerite is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Christine can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Barbara's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Trenton knows whether Gerald's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced th... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Daniel knows whether Jeremy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Bessie can now know whether Daniel can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tyree does not know whether Michelle is thirsty. Hypothesis: Michelle can now know whether Tyree can know whether Tyree is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Michael can now know that Allan can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Charissa does not know whether Robert is thirsty. Hypothesis: Robert can now know that Karen can know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Stephanie's card is shown to Stephanie. Estella's card is shown to Stephanie. Samuel's card is shown to Samuel. Estella's card is shown to Estella. It is publicly announced that someone picked a re... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Bernice knows whether Bernice is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Christopher is thirsty. Hypothesis: Paul can now know whether or not nobody ... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mavis's card is shown to Mavis. Velma's card is shown to Mavis. Kevin's card is shown to Kevin. Kevin's card is shown to Velma. Velma's card is shown to Velma. Kevin's card is shown to Marc. It is p... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica does not know whether Sherman is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Erica does not know... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Karl does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Karl can now know that Hyacinth's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Matthew does not know whether Jeanne is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joann is thirsty. It is publicly announced tha... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Gary's card is shown to George. George's card is shown to Gary. Gary's card is shown to Doris. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that George does not... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether Gloria's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Peter knows whether Gloria's forehead is muddy. Hypothe... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Terry is thirsty. Hypothesis: Deena can now know that Paul can know that Terry is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Van does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jill can now know whether Daniel can know whether Daniel's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Randy's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Randy knows whether Randy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Randy can now know ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Terry is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: George can now know that Michael is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jennifer does not know whether John is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jennifer does not know whether Eloise is thirsty. Hypothesis: Eloise can now know that John is th... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Patricia does not know whether Patricia's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Patricia does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesi... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Marilyn can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Susie knows whether Dorothy's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Susie can now know that Alan's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Luther does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Krista can now know whether Luther can know whether Peter is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Carol does not know whether Carol's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gregory knows whether Gregory's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that ... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lawrence's card is shown to Florida. Florida's card is shown to Lawrence. Marivel's card is shown to Lawrence. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Thomas does not know whether Joseph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Thomas is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Joseph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that J... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Neil does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Neil does not know whether Neil's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Herbert ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Sharon knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Sharon knows whether Sharon is thirsty. Hypothesis: Richard can now know that Sharon can know that every... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Heather knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly an... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jason's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Roy can now know that Roy's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Pauline can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jackie's card is shown to Jackie. Megan's card is shown to Jackie. Kris's card is shown to Jackie. Megan's card is shown to Megan. Megan's card is shown to Kris. It is publicly announced that someo... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Janet's card is shown to Miyoko. Miyoko's card is shown to Janet. Janet's card is shown to Janet. Maurice's card is shown to Janet. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothes... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Maria can now know that Maria's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Laura's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Laura can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Barbara knows whether Barbara's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Randy knows whether Carl's forehead is muddy. Hypothesi... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Daniel does not know whether Daniel's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether Daniel can... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Donald knows whether Dorian's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Dorian can now know whether Dorian's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Molly knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Molly can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Terrence's card is shown to Ruth. Ruth's card is shown to Terrence. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Ruth does not know whether or not everyone... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rebecca knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Carl can now know that Rebecca can know that Joe's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Kathleen can now know that Natasha can know that Natasha's forehead is mu... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Daryl's card is shown to Anna. Anna's card is shown to Rachel. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Anna can now know that Rachel picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Helen's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Francis can now know whether Helen can know that Carole's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Christophe... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Grace's card is shown to Anja. Willie's card is shown to Grace. Robert's card is shown to Robert. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Willie can now know whether Anj... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David does not know whether David's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that David does not kn... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Carol does not know whether Marion is thirsty. Hypothesis: Carol can now know whether Larry can know that Ruth is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether Claude's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Claude... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Pei's card is shown to Gary. Danielle's card is shown to Gary. Ignacio's card is shown to Ignacio. Danielle's card is shown to Pei. Gary's card is shown to Danielle. Danielle's card is shown to Dani... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Oliver's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kimberly ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Virginia knows whether Virginia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cara knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Billy can now know whether Cara is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Paul does not know whether Paul's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ozell's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Louis can now know that Paul can know whether... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Seymour does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Seymour does not know whether Todd is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Todd does ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Robert's card is shown to Robert. Wilfred's card is shown to Wilfred. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Wilfred knows whether Wilfred picked a red... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Philip knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Elizabeth can now know whether Phi... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Melissa's card is shown to Melissa. Darlene's card is shown to Melissa. Roy's card is shown to Melissa. Darlene's card is shown to Michael. Darlene's card is shown to Darlene. Darlene's card is show... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margo knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margo does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announc... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Shirley's card is shown to Shannon. Shirley's card is shown to Shirley. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Stacy can now know that Shannon can know that Stacy pick... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eric knows whether Andrew's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eric does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced th... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Bruce can now know that Linda is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Wendy knows whether Wendy's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Wendy can now kn... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lourdes's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Lourdes's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Lourdes's ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Donald knows whether Christopher's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Mary's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Donald can... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Stacey's card is shown to Robert. Robert's card is shown to Rachael. Stacey's card is shown to Rachael. Rachael's card is shown to Stacey. Stacey's card is shown to Stacey. It is publicly announced... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Cheryl can now know that Joe's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kevin knows whether Michael's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Thomas's forehead is muddy. ... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Patricia's card is shown to Kimberly. Kimberly's card is shown to Patricia. Donna's card is shown to Patricia. Patricia's card is shown to Patricia. It is publicly announced that someone picked a r... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jason does not know whether Jason's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Vickie can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Joseph knows whether Joseph's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Arthur can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Janet's card is shown to Janet. Carrie's card is shown to Janet. Janet's card is shown to Suzanne. Janet's card is shown to Carrie. Carrie's card is shown to Carrie. It is publicly announced that s... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Nell can now know that Madeleine can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Darlene's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Darlene can now know that Patrick can know that Patrick's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Stephen's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Stephen can now know that Shasta's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rose's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mildred can now know whether Rose's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tracey knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Loretta does not know whether Tracey is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Tracey knows whether... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jarvis knows whether Donald's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Victoria's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Victoria ca... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Samuel's card is shown to Kathryn. Emily's card is shown to Kathryn. Samuel's card is shown to Samuel. Emily's card is shown to Samuel. Kathryn's card is shown to Scott. Scott's card is shown to Emi... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Shellie's card is shown to Shellie. Willie's card is shown to Shellie. Shellie's card is shown to Willie. Willie's card is shown to Willie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Charlotte is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Gracie can now know that Charlotte is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mildred's card is shown to Bart. Mildred's card is shown to James. James's card is shown to Mildred. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Mildred can now know that M... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Dwayne's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Dwayne can now know that Christopher can know that Dwayne's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Stanley knows whether Larry's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that John's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Stanley knows whether Stanle... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Silvia is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Silvia knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Silvia does not know whether or not everyone is th... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Milton knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Milton can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Eric is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jerry does not know whether John is thirsty. Hypothesis: Daisy can now know whether John is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Kyle's card is shown to Lisa. Monica's card is shown to Carol. Kyle's card is shown to Carol. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Lisa does not kno... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Lisa can now know whether Carolyn can know that Carolyn is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Stephanie knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Stephanie does not know whether Tracey is thirsty. Hypothesis: Stephanie can now know whether Vi... |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Rodney knows whether Rodney's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced tha... |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lucille's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Doris can now know whether Dewey can know whether Lucille's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Joshua can now know whether Timothy can know that someone is thirsty. |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 9