fassabilf's picture
Upload folder using huggingface_hub
ebb3040 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.61 kB

VoiceGuard — Competition Writeup

Task: Deepfake Audio Detection — binary classification
Metric: AUROC (Area Under the ROC Curve)
Dataset: 5,748 train samples, 1,254 test samples (~50% real, ~50% fake)
Format: Submission is score (probability 0–1 that audio is fake)
Sources: Real: LibriSpeech + VCTK. Fake: TTS-generated (Coqui Tacotron2, VITS, SpeechT5)


Approach Progression

# Approach Val AUROC Description
1 Spectral Features + LogReg 1.0000 Flatness, HNR, MFCC, ZCR, RMS → LogReg
2 Extended Acoustic + ExtraTrees 1.0000 + jitter, shimmer, chroma, spectral centroid/BW/rolloff → ExtraTrees
3 LFCC + GradientBoosting 1.0000 Linear Frequency Cepstral Coefficients + delta → GBM(200 trees)
4 CNN on Mel Spectrogram 1.0000 80×501 log-mel → 3-block CNN, BCELoss, 50 epochs
5 RawNet (1D CNN) 1.0000 Raw waveform → SincConv + ResBlocks + GRU, 20 epochs

Note on AUROC=1.0 across all approaches: Every approach — including the simplest logistic regression — achieves perfect AUROC on this dataset. TTS-generated speech has characteristic spectral artifacts (over-smooth formant trajectories, unnatural prosody, missing breath noise, abrupt high-frequency cutoff) that are linearly separable from real speech. This is intentional for a Pelatnas intro competition: participants are expected to understand why each feature works, not just tune hyperparameters.

Key Takeaways

  • LFCC is the strongest hand-crafted feature for anti-spoofing: inspired by ASVspoof 2019, Linear Frequency Cepstral Coefficients use a linearly-spaced filterbank (unlike mel's logarithmic spacing) that better captures fine-grained spectral artifacts in synthetic speech.
  • HNR is a fragile feature: the autocorrelation-based Harmonic-to-Noise Ratio produces infinity/NaN when the signal is nearly periodic. Always apply np.nan_to_num(X, nan=0, posinf=0, neginf=0) after extraction.
  • High-frequency energy ratio (HFE) is a simple but surprisingly effective feature: TTS vocoders often suppress or over-smooth high frequencies above 4 kHz. This single feature correlates strongly with fake audio.
  • RawNet skips feature engineering entirely: operating on the raw waveform, it learns its own sinc-based filters and captures phase information lost in spectrograms.

Dataset Details

  • Real audio: 4-second clips at 16 kHz, speaker-disjoint between train and test
  • Fake audio: generated by ≥3 TTS systems; at least 1 unseen system in test split
  • Train: 2,874 real + 2,874 fake; Test: 627 real + 627 fake
  • All clips padded/trimmed to exactly 4 seconds (64,000 samples)

Why Anti-Spoofing Matters

Deepfake audio enables voice phishing (vishing), impersonation fraud, and disinformation. The ASVspoof challenge series (2015, 2017, 2019, 2021) has driven the anti-spoofing research community. Key open-source datasets: ASVspoof 2019 LA (logical access — TTS/VC), ASVspoof 2021 DF (in-the-wild deepfakes).


Tips for Participants

  1. Start with approach 3 (LFCC): it reaches AUROC=1.0 in under 5 minutes on Colab CPU. Understand why LFCC outperforms standard MFCC for anti-spoofing before moving to CNNs.
  2. Always check for NaN/Inf: features like HNR can produce extreme values. Wrap feature loading with np.nan_to_num(arr, nan=0, posinf=0, neginf=0).
  3. AUROC vs. accuracy: use AUROC, not accuracy — threshold selection is dataset-dependent. A model predicting all-positive gets 50% AUROC, not 50% accuracy (which could be 50% too if balanced).
  4. BCEWithLogitsLoss for binary detection: numerically more stable than BCE + sigmoid separately. Track AUROC per epoch, not just loss.
  5. For real-world deepfakes: this dataset uses clean TTS. In the wild, audio is compressed (MP3, AAC), re-recorded, or mixed with background noise. Add augmentation if targeting production.
  6. SincConv: RawNet's SincConv layer learns the cutoff frequencies of bandpass filters from scratch, providing interpretable frequency-domain representations. It generalises better than fixed mel filters to unseen TTS systems.

Feature Engineering Insights

What distinguishes real from fake audio:

Feature Real Fake (TTS)
Spectral flatness Varied, peaky (resonances) Smooth, more uniform
High-freq energy Natural rolloff Abrupt cutoff (vocoder artifacts)
HNR Variable (breath, noise) Artificially high (clean synthesis)
Jitter/Shimmer Present (natural variation) Near-zero (perfectly regular F0)
LFCC texture Rich formant structure Over-smooth, fewer transitions

Reproducibility

All scripts use SEED = 42. Feature caches are saved to cache/vg_0N_{train,test}.npy. The CNN uses torch.manual_seed(42). The RawNet uses fixed sinc filter initialisation. joblib parallel extraction uses prefer="threads" for librosa thread-safety.


Baseline Comparison

Method Val AUROC Notes
Random score 0.500 Uniform random predictions
Approach 1 (Spectral LogReg) 1.000 27-dim spectral features sufficient
Approach 2 (Acoustic ExtraTrees) 1.000 Richer features, same ceiling
Approach 3 (LFCC GBDT) 1.000 LFCC most interpretable for anti-spoofing
Approach 4 (CNN mel) 1.000 End-to-end learned features
Approach 5 (RawNet) 1.000 Raw waveform, most general
Human (trained) ~0.85 Untrained humans: ~0.55