Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
int64
4.29k
4.33k
annotations
listlengths
1
1
drafts
listlengths
0
0
predictions
listlengths
0
0
data
dict
meta
unknown
created_at
stringlengths
27
27
updated_at
stringlengths
27
27
inner_id
int64
1
45
total_annotations
int64
1
1
cancelled_annotations
int64
0
0
total_predictions
int64
0
0
comment_count
int64
0
0
unresolved_comment_count
int64
0
0
last_comment_updated_at
null
project
int64
46
46
updated_by
int64
1
1
comment_authors
listlengths
0
0
4,286
[ { "id": 5258, "completed_by": 1, "result": [ { "value": { "start": 5720, "end": 5723, "text": "II.", "labels": [ "moeglicheDeutung" ] }, "id": "i46kp7VT2T", "from_name": "label", "to_name": "text"...
[]
[]
{ "text": "\nZur Verletzung des rechtlichen Gehörs im Wiedereinsetzungsverfahren.\n\nBeschluß des Zweiten Senats vom 15. Januar 1980 - 2 BvR 920/79 - in dem Verfahren über die Verfassungsbeschwerde der Frau S ... - Bevollmächtigte: Rechtsanwälte Dr. Gerhard Kunze und Günter Sauer, Leineweberstraße 45, Mülheim an der ...
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:20.815458Z
2025-11-29T08:04:49.389576Z
1
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,287
[{"id":5259,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":12852,"end":12854,"text":"B.","labels":["mo(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nZur Frage der Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Erzwingungshaft zur Abgabe einer eidesstattliche(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:21.507637Z
2025-11-29T08:12:04.078018Z
2
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,288
[{"id":5236,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":9638,"end":9640,"text":"B.","labels":["moeg(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nZu den Anforderungen an eine rechtsstaatliche Gesetzesgestaltung.\n\nBeschluß des Ersten(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:22.183965Z
2025-11-22T18:40:00.155680Z
3
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,289
[{"id":5237,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":6069,"end":6072,"text":"II.","labels":["moe(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\n1. Art. 6 Abs. 4 GG (Mutterschutz) enthält einen bindenden Auftrag an den Gesetzgeber.\n(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:22.864787Z
2025-11-16T20:10:18.203237Z
4
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,290
[{"id":5238,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":13047,"end":13049,"text":"B.","labels":["mo(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nZur Amtsbezeichnung von Lehrern im bremischen Schuldienst.\n\nBeschluß des Zweiten Senat(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:23.538400Z
2025-11-29T08:12:59.978116Z
5
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,291
[{"id":5239,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":5808,"end":5812,"text":"III.","labels":["mo(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nBeschluß des Zweiten Senats vom 27. März 1974 gemäß § 24 BVerfGG - 2 BvR 38/74 - in (...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:24.644299Z
2025-11-29T08:13:18.362545Z
6
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,292
[{"id":5240,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":1012,"end":1200,"text":"Eine Entscheidung (...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nBeschluß des Ersten Senats vom 23. Juli 1957 - 1 BvR 193/57 - in dem Verfahren über die(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:25.605432Z
2025-10-17T09:56:11.320146Z
7
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,293
[{"id":5241,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":8976,"end":8981,"text":"B.-I.","labels":["m(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\n1. Die Artikel 107 und 118 der Hessischen Verfassung in der Auslegung des Hessischen Staa(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:26.333851Z
2025-11-29T08:13:46.241090Z
8
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,294
[{"id":5242,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":27289,"end":27291,"text":"B.","labels":["mo(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nLeitsätze zum Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 24. November 1998\n- 2 BvL 26/91 u.a. -\n(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:27.117723Z
2025-11-16T20:15:19.564751Z
9
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
4,295
[{"id":5243,"completed_by":1,"result":[{"value":{"start":50123,"end":50125,"text":"B.","labels":["mo(...TRUNCATED)
[]
[]
{"text":"\nL e i t s ä t z e\nzum Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 18. Juli 2012\n- 1 BvL 10/10 - - 1 B(...TRUNCATED)
{}
2025-10-12T15:58:27.833426Z
2025-11-22T18:51:48.624084Z
10
1
0
0
0
0
null
46
1
[]
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Classifying Interpretive Canons — Raw Label Studio Export (pre-merge snapshot)

Raw, pre-merge Label Studio annotation export (project 46, snapshot 2026-07-25). Two fields needed to reconstruct the konkretes_gesetz (statutory-reference) subtask survive only in this pre-merge form: the per-reading determinate-content judgment bestimmt_moeglicheDeutung, which the postprocessing merge drops entirely, and the list of concrete provisions, which the merge flattens into a single unsplittable string (keeping only the first entry). Join to the benchmark by Label Studio region id.

Why this snapshot exists

The published benchmark (felix453/interpretive-canons-instances) is built from a merged/postprocessed export. That merge step is lossy in two ways that matter for reconstructing the statutory-reference subtask:

  • bestimmt_moeglicheDeutung is dropped. A valid konkretes_gesetz negative is a reading that reached the criterion (cleared the abstract and self-advanced gates) and carries a recorded bestimmt answer (Yes/No). A span that never reached the criterion, or was left unanswered, is not a negative. That judgment exists only here.
  • The concrete-provision list is flattened. Label Studio stores a multi-line TextArea answer as a list, one entry per provision; the merge joins them into one string and keeps only the first. The intact list survives only here.

Contents

  • raw-labelstudio-export-project-46-2026-07-25.json — the raw export, one task per decision (28 decisions), with per-region annotations under annotations[].result.

Companion datasets

Downloads last month
16