task_path
stringlengths
3
199
dataset
stringlengths
1
128
model_name
stringlengths
1
223
paper_url
stringlengths
21
601
metric_name
stringlengths
1
50
metric_value
stringlengths
1
9.22k
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
S3DIS
PointNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00593v2
Number of params
null
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
S3DIS
BIM-Net
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10222064
mIoU
59.5
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DeepLabv3+ (Xception-65-JFT)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02611v3
Mean IoU
89.0%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DeepLabv3+ (Xception-JFT)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02611v3
Mean IoU
89.0%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DeepLabv3-JFT
http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05587v3
Mean IoU
86.9%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
CASIA_IVA_SDN
http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.04943v1
Mean IoU
86.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Smooth Network with Channel Attention Block
http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09337v1
Mean IoU
86.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
SANet (pretraining on COCO dataset)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03402v4
Mean IoU
86.1%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
EncNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08904v1
Mean IoU
85.9%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
HamNet w/o COCO (ResNet-101)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04553v2
Mean IoU
85.9%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Auto-DeepLab-L
http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02985v2
Mean IoU
85.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
PSPNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01105v2
Mean IoU
85.4%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
ResNet-38 MS COCO
http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.10080v1
Mean IoU
84.9%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
OCR (HRNetV2-W48)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11065v6
Mean IoU
84.5%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
OCR (ResNet-101)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11065v6
Mean IoU
84.3%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Multipath-RefineNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.06612v3
Mean IoU
84.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
ShelfNet
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11254v6
Mean IoU
84.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
EANet (ResNet-101)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02358v2
Mean IoU
84%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Large Kernel Matters
http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02719v1
Mean IoU
83.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
TripleNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09299v1
Mean IoU
83.3%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
SANet
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03402v4
Mean IoU
83.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
TuSimple
http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08502v3
Mean IoU
83.1%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
EncNet (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08904v1
Mean IoU
82.9%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DFN (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09337v1
Mean IoU
82.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Deep Layer Cascade (LC)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01344v1
Mean IoU
82.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Light-Weight-RefineNet-152
http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03272v1
Mean IoU
82.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DANet (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02983v4
Mean IoU
82.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
PSPNet (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01105v2
Mean IoU
82.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Light-Weight-RefineNet-101
http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03272v1
Mean IoU
82.0%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Light-Weight-RefineNet-50
http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03272v1
Mean IoU
81.1%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
CentraleSupelec Deep G-CRF
http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08358v4
Mean IoU
80.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
EdgeNeXt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10589v3
Mean IoU
80.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
EdgeNeXt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10589v3
FLOPS
8.7G
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
EdgeNeXt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10589v3
Params
6.5M
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DeepLab-CRF (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00915v2
Mean IoU
79.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
WASPnet-CRF (ours)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03183v1
Mean IoU
79.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Light-Weight-RefineNet-MobileNet-v2
http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03272v1
Mean IoU
79.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Deeplab-v2 with Lovasz-Softmax loss
http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08790v2
Mean IoU
79.00%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Deeplab-v2 + Lovász-Softmax
http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08790v2
Mean IoU
79.0%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
CRF-RNN
http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03240v3
Mean IoU
74.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
SID
http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07485v2
Mean IoU
72.8%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DeepLab-MSc-CRF-LargeFOV (VGG-16)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7062v4
Mean IoU
71.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
ParseNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04579v2
Mean IoU
69.8%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Dilated FCN-2s VGG19
http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08254v3
Mean IoU
69%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
ESPNetv2
http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11431v3
Mean IoU
68.0%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
Dilated Convolutions
http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07122v3
Mean IoU
67.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
DiCENet
https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03516v3
Mean IoU
67.31%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
RRM
https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08039v1
Mean IoU
66.5
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
SSDD
https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01370v2
Mean IoU
65.5
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
BoxSup
http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01640v2
Mean IoU
64.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
PSA w/ EADER DeepLab (Xception-65)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04626v1
Mean IoU
63.8%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
ESPNet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06815v3
Mean IoU
63.01%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
FCN (VGG-16)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4038v2
Mean IoU
62.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
G2
http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08261v2
Mean IoU
56.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
PASCAL VOC 2012 test
CK
http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1808v1
Mean IoU
51.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
GAMUS
TIMF
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14914v1
mIoU
76.38
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
GAMUS
CMX
https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04838v5
mIoU
75.23
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
GAMUS
VCD
http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_CVPR_2020/html/Xiong_Variational_Context-Deformable_ConvNets_for_Indoor_Scene_Parsing_CVPR_2020_paper.html
mIoU
59.70
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
GAMUS
RTFNet
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8666745
mIoU
58.26
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
GAMUS
ShapeConv
https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10528v1
mIoU
55.86
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
GAMUS
MFNet
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8206396
mIoU
52.73
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ATLANTIS
Erfani et al.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11567v1
A-acc
68.63
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ATLANTIS
Erfani et al.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11567v1
A-mIoU
50.34
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ATLANTIS
Erfani et al.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11567v1
Accuracy
75.18
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ATLANTIS
Erfani et al.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11567v1
mIoU
42.22
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
VPNeXt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16654v1
mIoU
53.7
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
ViT-P (InternImage-H)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19795v1
mIoU
53.5
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
EVA
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07636v2
mIoU
53.4
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
RSSeg-ViT-L (BEiT pretrain)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13764v1
mIoU
52.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
RSSeg-ViT-L
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13764v1
mIoU
52.0%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
SegViT (ours)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05844v2
mIoU
50.3%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
SenFormer (Swin-L)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13280v2
mIoU
50.1%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
CAA (Efficientnet-B7)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07434v5
mIoU
45.4%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
HRNetV2 + OCR + RMI (PaddleClas pretrained)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11065v6
mIoU
45.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
DRAN(ResNet-101)
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9154612
mIoU
41.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
CAA (ResNet-101)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07434v5
mIoU
41.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
OCR (HRNetV2-W48)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11065v6
mIoU
40.5%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
EMANet
https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.13426v2
mIoU
39.9%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
DANet (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02983v4
mIoU
39.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
SVCNet (ResNet-101)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02651v1
mIoU
39.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
OCR (ResNet-101)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11065v6
mIoU
39.5%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
Asymmetric ALNN
https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07678v5
mIoU
37.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
CCL (ResNet-101)
http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2018/html/Ding_Context_Contrasted_Feature_CVPR_2018_paper.html
mIoU
35.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
RefineNet (ResNet-101)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.06612v3
mIoU
33.6%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
DAG-RNN (VGG-16)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00552v2
mIoU
31.2%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
COCO-Stuff test
FCN (VGG-16)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4038v2
mIoU
22.7%
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
AerialFormer-B
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06842v2
Overall Accuracy
93.9
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
AerialFormer-B
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06842v2
Mean F1
94.1
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
AerialFormer-B
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06842v2
Mean IoU
89.1
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
ViT-G12X4
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05215v4
Overall Accuracy
92.58
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
ViT-G12X4
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05215v4
Mean F1
92.12
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
FT-UNetFormer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08937v4
Overall Accuracy
92.0
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
FT-UNetFormer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08937v4
Mean F1
93.3
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
FT-UNetFormer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08937v4
Mean IoU
87.5
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
DC-Swin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12137v6
Overall Accuracy
92.0
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
DC-Swin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12137v6
Mean F1
93.25
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
DC-Swin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12137v6
Mean IoU
87.56
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
LSKNet-S
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11735v5
Overall Accuracy
92.0
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
LSKNet-S
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11735v5
Mean F1
93.1
10-shot image generation > Semantic Segmentation
ISPRS Potsdam
LSKNet-S
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11735v5
Mean IoU
87.2