id int64 4 458k | target_text stringlengths 33 45.8k ⌀ | verdict stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
7,193 | 10. When Gervais began her employment with Port Huron, she signed MEA’s joint member- ship application and dues check-off authorization form in, or about, August 1991 based on the union representative’s statements that union membership was an employment condition. 11. On, or about, September 25, 2013, Gervais notif... | win |
276,258 | (Claim Brought on Behalf of the Business Income Declaratory Judgment Class) (Claim Brought on Behalf of the Extra Expense Breach Class) (Claim Brought on Behalf of the Civil Authority Declaratory Judgment Class) (Claim Brought on Behalf of the Business Income Breach Class) (Claim Brought on Behalf of the Civil ... | lose |
431,758 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
53,982 | (Violation California’s Unfair Competition Law) (Breach Of The Implied Warranty Of Merchantability) (Deceptive Acts Or Practices, New York Gen. Bus. Law § 349) (False Advertising, New York Gen. Bus. Law § 350) (Fraud) (Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices In Violation of the California Consumers Legal Re... | lose |
248,097 | 16. To become a member on LinkedIn, Plaintiff and the Class members were required to complete a form on the LinkedIn website, www.linkedin.com, that required them to enter their first name, last name, email address, and password for their LinkedIn account. There is no charge to become a LinkedIn member although L... | lose |
6,054 | 14. Defendant Radius Agent develops software for real estate agents. 15. One of their software programs, Radius Assist, generates leads for real estate agents by automatically sending out text messages. 16. To advertise its software and demonstrate its functionality, Defendant used its software to automaticall... | win |
116,623 | 1. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Ms. Karstens resided in Maricopa County, Arizona, and is a citizen of the State of Arizona. 10. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendant has employed all Class Members in the role of phlebotomists during the Violative Period. 11. Defendant is an employer as... | lose |
407,231 | 27. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 26 of this complaint and incorporates them by reference. 28. Defendant and/or its agents transmitted text messages to cellular telephone numbers belonging to Plaintiff and the other members of the ATDS Class using an automatic telephone ... | win |
210,055 | 16. Defendant performs track and transit system construction and maintenance work in multiple states. 17. At all relevant times, Defendant employed Named Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals as non-exempt laborers. 18. Laborers performed the manual tasks associated with Defendant’s track and transit ... | win |
282,447 | 19. Acting in concert under color of state law — to-wit, the Ralph C. Dills Act, CAL. GOVT. CODE § 3512 et seq. — the State of California has recognized Local 1000 as the exclusive bargaining agent for the Plaintiffs and other State employees in bargaining units designated as Bargaining Units 1 (Professional, Administr... | lose |
313,705 | 30. Plaintiff brings her FLSA claims on behalf of herself and all similarly-situated persons who elect to opt-in to this action who work or have worked for Fifth Third as CSMs 6 between December 31, 2011 and the date of final judgment in this matter (the “Collective Action Period”). Anyone who released his or her... | win |
178,077 | 12.! Plaintiffs have been employed as servers, host/hostesses, and/or coat checkers by Defendants beginning at various times as early as March 2014, as described in the above paragraphs. 13.! At all relevant times, the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §206 has required the Defendants to pay the Plaintiffs a min... | win |
203,110 | 13. Plaintiff brings claims, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”) Rule 23, individually and on behalf of the following consumer class (the “Class”): All consumers with an address in the state of New Jersey who received a collection letter from the Defendant attempting to collect a d... | win |
416,210 | (Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. – Telephone Consumer Protection Act) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 31. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein. 32. In an effort to obtain clients, Casting360 made unsolicited and unwanted text message calls to Plaintiff and t... | win |
62,968 | 24. Defendant’s text message was transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text message constitutes telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff anti-aging ... | win |
331,756 | 15. While Defendant uniformly communicates to consumers that the Products can repair damaged hair, building this claim into the very name of its product line (“Repair”), the truth is that damaged hair cannot be repaired. Hairmomentum.com, a website dedicated to providing science-based hair care information, explai... | win |
277,633 | 14. Defendant owns, manages and/or operates the Hotel. 15. As part of its operations, Defendant provides its customers and the public reservations services, including, but not limited to, the ability to reserve rooms online via the Website. 16. Within the applicable limitations period, Plaintiff visited ... | win |
8,271 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
90,241 | 22. The ARG was founded in 1964 and is America’s first nationally franchised sandwich restaurant. ARG’s restaurant system consists of over 3,300 restaurants worldwide. In 2016, ARG produced system-wide sales of more than $3.6 billion.5 A large majority of these sales at ARG locations are made to customers using cr... | win |
116,161 | 1. a statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt- out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; 11. On or about April 1, 2016, Defendant transmitted by telephone facsimile... | lose |
9,218 | 17.1.7.9.6; 17.1.7.9.7; and 17.1.8 (Adopted: 1/20/17 effective 8/1/17). 27. Livers brings this action for unpaid minimum wages on his own behalf and on behalf of all recipients of athletic scholarships under Athletic Financial Aid Agreements requiring them to participate in NCAA athletics at private and semi-publi... | lose |
22,589 | (BREACH OF CONTRACT) (DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND RELIEF) 11. Pursuant to the Watkins Policy, Plaintiffs paid Universal premiums in exchange for insurance coverage. The required premiums were paid at all times relevant to this Complaint. 12. On or about December 25, 2017, Plaintiffs’ dwelling located on the Ins... | lose |
332,927 | 15. Facebook is the world’s leading online social media and networking platform. Its users can access Facebook from desktop and laptop computers as well as mobile devices, including smart phones and tablets. Facebook’s self-proclaimed mission is to “give people the power to build community and bring the world close... | lose |
14,555 | 17. Plaintiff White brings Counts I and II, the FLSA unpaid overtime claim and FLSA unpaid minimum wage claim, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) on behalf of herself and the following similarly situated employees of Defendant: All non-exempt hourly employees, regardless of actual title, who worked for Defendant durin... | lose |
398,743 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
143,266 | 14. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees as authorized under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). The similarly situated employees include: Collective Class: All persons who are or have been employed by Defendants as a non-exempt cleaner within three years prior to t... | win |
372,758 | 23. The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. As of July 24, 2017, Rice had 213,395,392 shares of common stock outstanding, which are actively traded on the NYSE under the symbol “RICE.” Although the exact number of Class members is not known to Plaintiff at this time, P... | lose |
337,777 | (Against All Defendants For Violations of Section 10(b) And Rule 10b-5 Promulgated Thereunder) (Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against The Individual Defendants) 18. Harvest Natural is a petroleum exploration and production company focusing on acquiring exploration, development and producing p... | lose |
236,603 | 10. The facsimiles encourage, “It only takes 5 minutes to see if you qualify for our 60 minute Survey.” Id. 11. The facsimiles request the recipients to call Defendant at 877-770-8660 to set up their interview. Id. 3 12. The facsimiles provide a time range for the calls and a contact person: Exhibit 1, “Thursday,... | win |
258,816 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | lose |
93,533 | (Failure to Pay Overtime Wages) 20. Defendant operates and has operated “call centers” in Arizona and across the nation where telephone-dedicated employees similar to Plaintiff handle phone calls regarding banking and investment services offered by Defendant to its customers. 22. Prior to starting work on the... | win |
315,119 | 25. On or about December 1, 2015, Plaintiff became a member of Defendant’s fitness facility. 26. In 2018, Plaintiff cancelled his membership with Defendant. 27. Subsequently, on or about August 10, 2018, Defendant caused an automated text message to be transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number endin... | win |
96,440 | 11. Plaintiff brings this action as a state wide class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”), on behalf of himself and all New Jersey consumers and their successors in interest (the “Class”), who have received debt collection letters and/or notices from the Defenda... | win |
14,261 | 1. � Whether Defendant’s conduct as alleged herein constituted conversion. 20. This action is brought and may properly be maintained as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. This action satisfies the numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy requirements under Rule 23 (a). Additionally, prosecution o... | win |
86,697 | 20. Defendant is in the business of performing general residential construction, including painting, roofing, tiling, pouring concrete, and other handyman work in southwestern Louisiana. Defendant employs several manual laborers at various job sites simultaneously. 21. Defendant paid Plaintiff by check. 23.... | win |
237,784 | 33. Under this system, 8 U.S.C. § 1151(a) sets forth four different categories of individuals who may be issued immigrant visas and the individual numeric annual limitations for each category; § 1151(b) sets forth specific categories of individuals not subject to the numerical limitation; and § 1152 sets a cap on t... | lose |
283,730 | (Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices in Violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act) (Violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law) 1. Whether Defendants charged the $3.50 to all rentals originating at the San Diego Airport as a policy and practice during the Class Period; 13. On April 1... | lose |
183,890 | 15. Defendant is an online retailer of towels and dryer balls. On the Website, one can purchase items including bath towels, hand towels, dryer balls and similar items. Without any brick and mortar stores, the Website is the exclusive point of sale for customers to purchase products directly from Defendant. ... | win |
282,700 | (Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227) 22. Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of and all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 23. Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, the Classes, consisting of: All persons in the United States who received any un... | lose |
408,889 | 36. Class Definition. Powell brings this class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of the following class (the “Class”): all TWU members who enrolled in Early Separation from American between November 29, 2011, and July 26, 2013. 41. Powell re-alleges each of the preceding paragraphs as if set forth ... | lose |
25,290 | 10. Student housing is in high demand at the University of Central Florida and nearby colleges. Students may choose to live in college-owned dormitories or private off-campus apartments. The Retreat at Orlando, owned by Defendant, offers a third option — a “preferred student living community in Orlando, Florida, se... | lose |
307,704 | 18. Xi’an owns and operates fast casual restaurants that serves authentic Northern Chinese dishes across New York, including locations at 81 St. Mark’s Place, New York, New York and 24 W. 45th Street, New York, New York at which customers can purchase Chinese food and beverages. 19. Xi’an offers its Website to t... | win |
362,765 | 10. Furthermore, during the relevant time period Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiffs for all time worked and engaged in a practice of shorting Plaintiffs’ hours. Additionally, some or all Plaintiffs were not paid for their final week of work subsequent to the termination of their employment for Defendants. ... | win |
245,833 | 15. A true and correct copy of Defendant’s June 25, 2020 written communication is attached as Exhibit A. 16. Defendant’s June 25, 2020 written communication begins by encouraging Ms. Stivers to “[p]lease talk to us.” Ex. A. 17. Next, Defendant’s June 25, 2020 threatens Ms. Stivers: At this time, no attorney... | lose |
342,295 | 19. Plaintiffs repeat, reiterate and incorporate the allegations contained in paragraphs numbered *1'through "lS" herein with the same force and effectas if the same were set forth at length herein. 20. On April 18,2015 Defendant began communicating with Plaintiff by rheans of telephone calls to Plaintiff SIMCHA PODOL... | lose |
173,629 | 21. Upon information and belief, Corporate Defendants DEENORA CORP d/b/a Dee's; and DEE'S BRICK OVEN PIZZA, INC d/b/a Dee’s are joint employers of Plaintiff and constitute an enterprise as the term is defined by 29 USC §203(r) insofar as they are indistinguishable from one another, being owned by the same owners, o... | win |
135,041 | 21. PNC utilized Corevest and Prins to originate mortgage loans to consumers looking to acquire properties over a period of years out of the New York office. 23. Corevest and Prins solicited Barli for four different mortgage loans, spanning over 60 single-family homes as collateral. 24. Corevest and Prins affi... | lose |
8,871 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Website, with contact information for users to report accessibility-... | win |
18,062 | 22. Plaintiff’s alleged obligation arises from a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services that are the subject of the transaction were incurred primarily for personal, family, or household purposes—namely, a personal automobile loan (the “Debt”). 23. Defendant uses instrumentalities of ... | win |
60,001 | 1 A. TRADE AND COMMERCE 2 1 VIOLATION OF SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT 2 10 VII. FACTS ................................................................................................... 11 11 16 COUNT TWO ............................................................................................... 29 17... | lose |
167,589 | 10. After decades of no progress, in June 2006, female Morgan Stanley FAs challenged unequal pay and account distributions in the class action sex discrimination lawsuit Augst-Johnson v. Morgan Stanley & Co., No. 06-cv-1142 (D.D.C.). In April 2007, Morgan Stanley agreed to settle the Augst-Johnson case for $46 mil... | win |
372,432 | 13. Definition of Class. The class consists of all individuals who: (1) have been, are or will be participants or beneficiaries under the Plan, at any time on or after October 3, 2009 and/or the relevant statute of limitations; and (2) have required, require or are expected to require treatment in an outdoo... | lose |
212,892 | 10. Discovery may reveal the transmission of additional faxes as well. 11. Defendant Altegra Health Connections, LLC, is responsible for sending or causing the sending of the fax. 12. Defendant Altegra Health Connections, LLC, as the entity whose products and services were advertised in the fax, derived economic ... | lose |
412,312 | (ILLINOIS MINIMUM WAGE LAW AND OTHER SIMILAR STATE WAGE LAWS) (ILLINOIS WAGE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION ACT AND OTHER SIMILAR STATE WAGE LAWS) (VIOLATIONS OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. §201 ET SEQ. PLAINTIFF, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF THE FLSA COLLECTIVE) 18. In an effort to provide low cost merch... | win |
380,086 | 12. Synergy Capital’s overall marketing plan involves placing prerecorded calls and autodialed phone calls to consumers without consent, regardless of whether those consumers have their phone numbers registered with the DNC. 13. Synergy Capital places incessant calls to individuals across the United States, unti... | lose |
59,261 | (Against Cardone Capital for Violation of Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act) (Against Cardone for Violation of Section 15 of the Securities Act) 64. Plaintiff bring this action on their own behalf, and on behalf of a class pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clas... | lose |
361,123 | (FLSA – COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR UNPAID OVERTIME) (R.C. § 4111.03 – RULE 23 CLASS ACTION FOR UNPAID OVERTIME) (R.C. § 4113.5 – RULE 23 CLASS ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE OHIO PROMPT PAY ACT) 18. All of the preceding paragraphs are realleged as if fully rewritten herein. 19. During their employment with Defendan... | lose |
401,257 | 50. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the preceding allegations as if fully set forth herein. 51. The Individual Defendants disseminated the false and misleading Proxy Statement, which contained statements that, in violation of Section 14(a) of the 1934 Act and Rule 14a-9, in light of the circumstances under which ... | lose |
256,688 | (BREACH OF CONTRACT) (UNJUST ENRICHMENT) (VIOLATION OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT) 40. Defendant has intentionally and repeatedly engaged in a practice of improperly and unlawfully failing to pay their non-exempt employees including, but not limited to, the Plaintiffs and the collective group of similarly-si... | win |
179,821 | 53. Plaintiff brings this case as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. 54. Plaintiff brings this case on behalf of the Class defined as follows: No Consent Class: All persons in the United States who, within four years prior to the filing of this ... | lose |
272,969 | 27. Defendant owns and operates a medical marijuana licensing service, focusing on same- day provision of marijuana licenses to consumers seeking to take advantage of Defendant’s services. 39. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of two (2) nationwide classes of similarly situated individuals. 40. The first c... | win |
155,848 | 21. Defendant is a snack company that owns and operates the website, www.snacklins.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. Defendant’s Website offer... | win |
179,236 | 12. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 48. Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, the Class, consisting of: a. All persons within the United States who had or have a number assigned to a cell... | win |
437,690 | (FLSA – COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR UNPAID OVERTIME) (RECORDKEEPING VIOLATIONS OF THE OHIO WAGE ACT) (UNPAID OVERTIME PURSUANT TO THE OHIO WAGE LAW) (VIOLATION OF OHIO'S PROMPT PAY ACT) 21. Plaintiffs restates the preceding paragraphs as if fully realleged herein. 22. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was employed... | lose |
39,289 | 10. Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system”, as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its calls to Plaintiff seeking to sell or solicit its business services. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 12. Defendant’... | win |
50,534 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibilit... | win |
171,433 | 20. Plaintiff files this case as an “opt-in” collective action, as is specifically allowed by 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). 22. The specific job titles or job requirements of the various members of the Plaintiff Class do not prevent collective treatment. 23. Each non-exempt employee, regardless of job title, job require... | lose |
338,006 | 10. Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its call to Plaintiff seeking to solicit its services. 11. On or about February 17, 2020, Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone number (480) 926-4000 confirmed to be Defendant’s... | lose |
54,430 | 12. Defendants sought to collect from Plaintiff an alleged debt incurred by Plaintiff for personal, family, or household purposes; more specifically, the debt at issue was a delinquent medical debt. 3 13. Defendant Pendrick purchases debt from original creditors while the debt is in default with the original cr... | win |
372,015 | 19. Ms. Alvelo brings an FLSA claim for unpaid overtime on behalf of herself and all similarly situated persons who work or have worked for Defendant as Operations Account Representatives and who elect to opt in to this action (the “FLSA Collective”). 20. Ms. Alvelo and the FLSA Collective are current and former ... | win |
406,348 | 10. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the Debt”). 11. The Debt was primarily for personal, family or household purposes and is therefore a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 12. Sometime after the incurrence of the Debt, Plaintiff fell behind on payments owed. 13. Thereafter, at an exact ... | win |
193,102 | 10. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the Debt”). 11. The Debt was primarily for personal, family or household purposes and is therefore a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 12. Sometime after the incurrence of the Debt, Plaintiff fell behind on payments owed. 13. Thereafter, at an exact ... | win |
22,242 | 14. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt ("the alleged Debt"). 15. The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household purp... | win |
375,209 | (Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. – Telephone Consumer Protection Act) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 11. During late August of 2017, Plaintiff Fidencio Lainez provided his cellullar telephone number ending in -8376 (“-8376 number”) in connection with the purchase of an IDT calling product. 12. On... | lose |
304,159 | (Violation of New York General Business Law Section 349) 11.” The dog bursts into the kitchen, shouting “Yummy, crunchy, BACON! BACON! BACON!” After looking at an empty frying pan on the stovetop, the dog cries: “There, in that bag” as he sees the woman of the household holding the bag of Beggin’ Strips. She wo... | lose |
254,707 | (Collective Action Alleging FLSA Violations) A. FLSA COVERAGE (Class Action Alleging Violations of the Missouri Act) A. MISSOURI ACT COVERAGE 23. Harvey Pallets provides wooden shipping pallets to its clients across the United States and claims to have “more than two billion pallets in circulation at any giv... | win |
421,928 | 21. Defendant is a footwear and accessories retailer, and owns and operates www.burnetieshoes.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services and which Defendant ensures the delivery of such goods throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. ... | lose |
168,102 | (Violation of USERRA, 38 U.S.C. § 4311) (Violation of USERRA, 38 U.S.C. § 4316) (Violation of USERRA, 38 U.S.C. § 4312) (Violation of USERRA, 38 U.S.C. § 4313) 66. Plaintiff repeats and incorporates the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 67. USERRA, 38 U.S.C. § ... | win |
211,754 | 17. Plaintiff Elodie Passelaigue is a professional, internationally-renowned fashion model. She currently is represented by the world-famous New York modeling agency, Wilhelmina Models. In the past, she has been represented by other prominent modeling agencies including Visage Management (Zurich), Group Model Mana... | win |
134,008 | 16. On several occasions in the past, Plaintiff visited Defendant’s retail establishments located in San Diego, California, including the stores located at 8440 Rio San Diego Drive, San Diego, California 92108 and 11860 Carmel Mountain Road #210, San Diego, California 92128. 17. On one such occasion, Plaintiff ... | win |
348,140 | 24. Defendant is a Park and Entertainment Resort that owns and operates www.hersheypa.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access its goods and services throughout the United States, including Pennsylvania. 25. Plaintiff is a visually-impaired and legally blind person, who ca... | win |
260,371 | 21. Defendant is a theater that operates its theater as well as the Website to the public. The theater is located at 66 4th Street, New York, New York. Defendant’s theater constitutes a place of public accommodation. Defendant’s theater provides to the public important goods and services. Defendant’s Website prov... | win |
243,128 | (Declaratory Relief) 112. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 111 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 113. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | win |
341,908 | 18. Plaintiff brings claims for relief as a collective action pursuant to FLSA Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all non-exempt employees (including cooks, line cooks, food preparers, cashiers, counter persons, dishwashers, porters, cleaning persons and delivery persons) employed by Defendants on or a... | win |
397,844 | 23. On April 27, 2018, on behalf of Defendants, another debt collector, Frontline Asset Strategies, sent Plaintiff a letter in an attempt to collect the Debt from Plaintiff. (A true and exact copy of Frontline’s letter to Plaintiff ,dated April 27, 2018, is attached hereto as Exhibit C). 24. The aforesaid letter... | lose |
75,664 | (Declaratory Judgment) (On Behalf of Plaintiffs and the Class) Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference herein all of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 55. (Negligence) (On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference herein all of the allegatio... | lose |
405,663 | 27. Plaintiff brings the Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief on behalf of himself and all persons who worked as unpaid YFT Cleaners at CPY in California at any point(s) in time between May 19, 2012 and the date CPY ceased the YFT program at the relevant studio(s) (the “California Yoga for Trade Class... | win |
172,850 | 28. It is, upon information and belief, Defendant’s policy and practice to deny Plaintiff, along with other blind or visually-impaired users, access to Defendant’s website, and to therefore specifically deny the goods and services that are offered thereby. Due to Defendant’s failure and refusal to remove access barrier... | win |
224,302 | 21. Defendant is an athleticwear company that owns and operates the website, www.alanic.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. Defendant’s Website ... | lose |
57,888 | 24. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of a nationwide class of similarly situated individuals. 36. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as though fully set forth herein. 37. The foregoing acts and omissions of Defendant constitute numerous and multiple ne... | lose |
225,563 | 28. Plaintiff still has and had, at all relevant times to this action, telephone facsimile service at 760-406-9889 at its place of business at Whiting Family Dental, 16127 Kasota Road, Suite 103, Apple Valley, California 92307. Plaintiff receives facsimile transmissions (“faxes”) at this number, using a telephone ... | lose |
132,873 | 21. Defendant is an apartment rental company that owns and operates the website, www.apartments.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services which Defendant ensures the delivery of throughout the United States, including New York State. 22. Defendant’s ... | win |
419,738 | (Injunctive Relief) (To Recover Damages for Trespass) (To Recover Damages For Slander of Title) (To Recover Profits From Unjust Enrichment) 1. That this Court certify the Class described herein, and name Plaintiffs as the representative of the Class and Plaintiffs’ counsel as counsel for the Class. 2. That... | win |
29,122 | 14. Plaintiffs and Class members faithfully paid policy premiums to Defendants, 4 specifically to provide, among other things, additional coverages in the event of business 5 interruption or closures by order of Civil Authority and for business loss for property damage. 6 15. The terms of the Policy explicitly provide... | lose |
204,322 | 13. The Gaviota Coast north of Santa Barbara is a special place. Its blue waters and beautiful coastline are home to an abundance of life, including critical populations of endangered Snowy Plovers, seals, migrating whales, and myriad fish. For those reasons, the area is often called North America’s Galapagos. 15. For... | lose |
424,152 | 24. It is, upon information and belief, Defendant’s policy and practice to deny Plaintiff, along with other blind or visually-impaired users, access to Defendant’s website, and to therefore specifically deny the goods and services that are offered and integrated with Defendant’s locations. Due to Defendant’s failur... | win |
223,358 | 16. MRMC is a privately held entity that has more than 2,600 employees. MRMC bills itself, through its various subsidiaries, as “an independent provider of marketing and distribution of fuel oil, asphalt, sulfuric acid, diesel fuel and high-quality naphthenic lubricants. . . . MRMC’s surface transportation capabili... | win |
217,253 | 10. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 11. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant MCM sent a collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. that offered optio... | win |
103,309 | 60. BA deceptively markets that consumers need or would benefit from supplementing their hydration. 61. To that end, BA deceptively markets that BodyArmor is a “super drink” that delivers “superior” and “better” hydration to everyone. 62. BA deceptively markets that BodyArmor offers “More Natural Better” hydra... | lose |
100,480 | (Violation of the Rosenthal FDCPA) (Violation of the FDCPA) 18. Sometime after November 9, 2016, Plaintiff received her first collection notice dated November 9, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “Validation Notice”) from Defendant, attempting to collect a debt in the amount of $10,024.42. The debt was allege... | win |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.