id int64 4 458k | target_text stringlengths 33 45.8k ⌀ | verdict stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
255,935 | 33. Beginning on or about November 2016 through on or about February 2019, Defendants employed Plaintiff as a non-exempt, hourly-paid employee. 34. Plaintiff’s duties included bartending, taking food orders, and preparing drinks for customers. 35. Plaintiff, for some or all of the relevant time period, was not... | win |
170,355 | 1. a statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt-out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; 13. On information and belief, between October, 2014 and January, 2015, Def... | win |
22,273 | 12. Plaintiff brings claims for relief as a collective action pursuant to FLSA Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all current and former non-exempt employees (including waiters, runners, bussers, and bartenders) employed by Defendants on or after the date that is six (6) years before the filing of the ... | lose |
432,743 | 31. Mercy Health (formerly Catholic Health Partners) purports to be a Catholic health organization, supervising market delivery systems consisting of hospitals, physician clinics, and other organizations providing health-related services. 32. Mercy Health employs 32,000 employees and is the fourth largest employe... | win |
232,356 | 25. Defendants operate two Irish restaurants located in the Midtown West section of Manhattan in New York City. 26. Upon information and belief, individual Defendants John Creegan and Brendan Creegan possess operational control over the Defendant Corporations, each possess an ownership interest in Defendant Cor... | win |
61,922 | 19. At all times relevant to this matter, Plaintiff was an individual residing within the State of California. 20. Furthermore, Defendant conducted business within the State of California at all times relevant. 21. At some point prior to the filing of this matter, Plaintiff resolved a number of debts owed to v... | win |
59,545 | 10. Discovery may reveal the transmission of additional faxes as well. 11. Defendant Everidis Health Sciences, LLC, is responsible for sending or causing the sending of the fax. 12. Defendant Everidis Health Sciences, LLC, as the entity whose products and services were advertised in the fax, derived economic benef... | lose |
214,267 | (Violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227) 16. In recent years, marketers who often have felt stymied by federal laws limiting solicitation by telephone, facsimile machine, and e-mail have increasingly looked to alternative technologies through which to cheaply send bulk solicitations. One of the newest types of such bulk marketi... | lose |
118,326 | (FLSA Overtime Violations) (Ohio Class) (Ohio Overtime Violations) 10. At all times relevant, Defendant was an “employer” within the meaning of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 203(d). 11. Defendant’s hourly, non-exempt employees included Plaintiff, the Opt-Ins and the Ohio Class. 3 12. At all times relevant, Defe... | win |
66,346 | 15. PEPPERIDGE FARM manufactures, distributes, markets, advertises, and sells the Product, which claims to be “Natural,” when in fact, it is not, because it contains GMOs in the form of soy and/or soy derivatives within its ingredients; specifically, soybean oil. 16. Defendant’s “Natural” statement prominently d... | lose |
160,047 | 12. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 13. The Class consists of: 1) all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; 2) to whom Defendant DRS sent an initial collection letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; 3) that inc... | win |
51,530 | 24. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff cannabis ... | lose |
111,906 | 24. Plaintiffs bring this class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and (b)(2) and/or (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on their behalf and on behalf of a class similarly situated and affected during the pendency of this lawsuit and in the future. Plaintiffs will seek to certify a class to seek relief with... | win |
236,583 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
32,519 | (for Amy Summers) (for Charles Edward Steed) (for Amy Summers) 12. In July 2010, Steed reviewed his credit report and noticed that Equifax was reporting various items that did not belong to him. On or about July 2, 2010, Steed notified Equifax that he disputed these items, including an inquiry from ClearPoint... | lose |
155,575 | 10. Defendant Golden Flake employed Route Drivers, who delivered Golden Flake’s products and other snack products to its customers including chain retail grocery stores. 11. Plaintiff was a Route Driver employed by Golden Flake during the three-year period preceding the filing of this Complaint. 12. Golden... | win |
178,633 | 14) Upon information and belief, on a date better known by Defendant, Defendant began to attempt to collect an alleged consumer debt from the Plaintiff. 15) Within the one year immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, the Defendant contacted the Plaintiff on multiple occasions via telephone and left nu... | win |
124,062 | (Declaratory Relief) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 103. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as if set forth fully herein. 104. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and believes that Defendan... | win |
195,277 | 15. At all times relevant, Plaintiffs are individuals residing within the State of Nevada. 16. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that at all times relevant, Defendant conducted business in the State of Nevada. 17. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendant is a ... | win |
209,772 | 14. Pisa Group is a nationwide telemarketing company that exclusively conducts newspaper subscription sales and retention telemarketing. Pisa Group has more than 100 newspaper partners throughout the United States—including Plain Dealer and the John Doe Defendants—for which it conducts telemarketing campaigns.1 1... | lose |
82,579 | 10. On April 13, 2018, the Bankruptcy Noticing Center provided Official Form 309A— Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case to Northwoods Bank via first class mail to the scheduled address. It was not returned as undeliverable. 11. On July 24, 2018, the Honorable Robert J. Kressel entered an order of discharge, effec... | lose |
236,734 | 10. During the course of his employment with Defendants, Plaintiff regularly worked in excess of forty (40) hours in individual weeks. 11. Defendants failed to pay overtime compensation to Plaintiff for all time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in an individual week, instead paying part of the compensable tim... | win |
233,713 | 10. On or about October 12, 2012, Plaintiff received another phone call on his cellular telephone, and the same number appeared on his phone’s caller identification: 1-888-613- 0232. 11. Plaintiff again declined to answer the call, and received a voicemail recording of the same pre-recorded message transcribed in ... | lose |
195,533 | 14. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and on behalf of and all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 15. Plaintiff represents, and is a member of the Class, consisting of all persons within the United States who receive any unsolicited telephone calls from Defendant or its agents on their pagi... | lose |
19,656 | 1. Numerosity. 16. Plaintiff John Doe #1 is an individual who resides in Tennessee and is required to comply with SORA. 17. Doe #1 was convicted of “indecency with child contact” in 1999. The victim was un- der the age of twelve at the time of the offense for which Doe #1 was convicted. No law in effect at the ti... | lose |
231,732 | 29. Plaintiff Rios is a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 30. Ms. Rios’s telephone number, (435) XXX-9252, is assigned to a cellular telephone service. 31. Ms. Rios’s cellular telephone line is used for residential purposes. 32. Ms. Rios’s cellular telephone line has been on the National Do Not Call Regist... | win |
71,497 | 1. Plaintiff and class representative Michael Daley is an individual and a resident and citizen of the State of Illinois. 10. The COA describes plaintiff and putative class members as “independent contractors.” 11. As Jones Motor drivers, plaintiff and members of the putative class are at the core of Jones Motor’s ... | lose |
144,304 | 1. Certification of this case as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, and appointing Plaintiff as a class representative and Fair Work, P.C. as class counsel; 2. An equitable award of all make-whole relief to which Plaintiff and the Class are entitled; 4. Attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest, as per... | lose |
117,672 | 20. Apostelos solicited investors through his associated companies and in his individual capacity. He offered and sold investors promissory notes issued in his own name or in the name of one of his associated companies. He also offered and sold membership units in another of his associated companies. Sale of ... | lose |
208,434 | 13. The debt was incurred by the plaintiff primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, and is a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 14. On or about February 23, 2015, Midland sent the plaintiff a copy of the letter attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference. 15.... | lose |
17,918 | 12. Excluded from the Class is any person who is an executive, officer, employee, and/or director of the Defendant corporation. 13. The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all Class members is not practical. The precise size of the Class will be determined through discovery. 14. Plaintiff’s cla... | win |
132,009 | 22. Plaintiff brings this case as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. 23. Plaintiff brings this case on behalf of the Class defined as follows: Do Not Call Registry Class: All persons in the United States who from four years prior to the filing ... | win |
58,913 | 11. Plaintiff brings this action as a class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”), on behalf of himself and all New Jersey consumers and their successors in interest (the “Class”), who have received debt collection telephone communication from the Defendant, where ... | lose |
164,682 | 25. Plaintiff seeks to bring this suit to recover from Defendants her full payment of all unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation and liquidated damages under the applicable provisions of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), individually, on her own behalf, as well as on behalf of those in the following collective: ... | win |
34,770 | 10. In or about September, 2014, DEFENDANT mailed PLAINTIFF a collection letter, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, in an attempt to collect a consumer debt from PLAINTIFF allegedly owed to another. 11. The letter states in pertinent part: Unless you notify this office within (30) thirty days after receiving this n... | lose |
214,918 | 43. Plaintiffs bring this class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as representatives of the following class: All current or former residents of EPA’s designated Upper Columbia River waste contamination study site, who have suffered a personal injury as a direct result of Teck’s e... | lose |
262,400 | null | lose |
86,554 | 1. Plaintiff Bearing Brokers, Inc., brings this action to secure redress for the actions of defendant Morgan & Curtis Associates, Inc., in sending or causing the sending of unsolicited advertisements to telephone facsimile machines in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. §227 (“TCPA”), the Illi... | lose |
389,437 | 10. Plaintiff was handcuffed and placed into the unmarked police car. Officer John then drove plaintiff’s car to the Harrison Street Police Station. Defendant Lopez followed in the unmarked car with the plaintiff handcuffed in the back seat. While on the way to the police 3 station, the plaintiff asked that his lawy... | lose |
302,349 | 10. At all times relevant, Plaintiffs were citizens of the State of California. Plaintiffs are, and at all times mentioned herein were, “persons” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 11. Defendant is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a corporation and a “person,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153 (10). 12. At ... | win |
257,108 | 17. Plaintiffs bring the second and third causes of action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for themselves and on behalf of a class consisting of all persons who have worked for Defendants in Ohio from three years preceding the filing of this lawsuit through the culmination of this litigation i... | win |
187,553 | (Against All Defendants For Violations of Section 10(b) And Rule 10b-5 Promulgated Thereunder) (Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against The Individual Defendants) 1. Cash Position: Cash and liabilities at December 31, 2014 of approximately $14.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. (Subsequent... | lose |
383,942 | 1. A statement that the recipient is legally entitled to opt-out of receiving future faxed advertisements – knowing that he or she has the legal right to request an opt- out gives impetus for recipients to make such a request, if desired; 11. On information and belief, on or about November 6, 2014, Defendants tran... | win |
175,962 | 18. On or around February 17, 2019, Plaintiffs purchased food at a Buca di Beppo located at 705 6th Avenue, San Diego, California, one of the affected locations, using their joint credit card. 19. Plaintiffs continue to monitor their accounts in an effort to detected and prevent any further misuses. 20. Since... | win |
436,235 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | lose |
386,905 | 10. This matter is properly maintainable as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) in that: (a) The Putative Class, which potentially includes in excess of sixty persons, is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (b) There are substantial questions of law and fact common to the Putativ... | lose |
89,679 | 12. Plaintiff seeks to bring this suit to recover from Defendants unpaid overtime compensation, and liquidated damages, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), individually, on his own behalf, as well as on behalf of those in the following collective: Current and former drivers, who ... | win |
421,231 | 12. On January 17, 2014, Capital Funds transmitted a Junk Fax to Barron’s and to thousands of other entities throughout the United States (the “Junk Fax”). A copy of the Junk Fax is attached as Exhibit 1. 13. At no time did Barron’s give Capital Funds its express prior invitation or permission, or prior consent... | lose |
395,553 | 19. Chartered in 1821, The George Washington University has a current enrollment of approximately 28,000 undergraduate and graduate students across 10 schools and colleges. 20. As of June 30, 2019, Defendant’s endowment totaled approximately $1.779 billion and the university ended the fiscal year with assets tota... | lose |
353,545 | 15. Plaintiff’s telephone number, (985) 228-XXXX, is registered to a cellular telephone service. All calls to Plaintiff described herein were to that cellular telephone number. 16. Plaintiff’s telephone number, (985) 228-XXXX, has been on the National Do Not Call Registry since May 5, 2019. 17. The TCPA defin... | win |
408,853 | 17. On April 9, 2018, Attorney Brian Shrive filed a state court lawsuit against the City of Cincinnati and five city council members alleging, in essence, that the council members violated the Case: 1:19-cv-00475-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/24/19 Page: 5 of 13 PAGEID #: 5 6 Ohio Open Meetings Act by conducting city bus... | lose |
20,298 | 40. Plaintiff brings this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all persons similarly situated and proximately damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following Plaintiff Classes: FLSA Class: 41. The FLSA Class refers to all persons who are, or have been, e... | win |
389,598 | 10. TransUnion routinely reports information about tax liens on consumer reports and continues to report tax liens for a specified number of years after they have been paid, satisfied or released. 11. On or about May 5, 2016, a Massachusetts state tax lien in the amount of $500 was entered against the property... | lose |
131,085 | (Breach of Contract) (On Behalf of Plaintiff and all Class Members Against Defendant) 19. A record label such as Sony Music executes contracts with its artistic talent, which includes the ability of the label to license and distribute the works. In exchange for its licensing and marketing of the artistic works, ... | win |
204,651 | 15. At all times relevant, the principal purpose of MCS was the collection of debts using the mails and telephone. 16. At all times relevant, MCS regularly attempted to collect debts alleged to be due to another. 17. At all times relevant, MCS regularly collected or attempted to collect debts due or alleged... | win |
287,446 | 1. This is a class action lawsuit on behalf of all people who paid tuition and fees for the Spring 2020 academic semester at FDU, and who, because of Defendant’s response to the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic, lost the benefit of the education for which they paid, and/or the services for which... | lose |
207,348 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
369,270 | 16. The Plans are “employee pension benefit plans” within the meaning of ERISA 2019 PLAN ASSETS 2019 FEE THE PLANS | lose |
450,888 | 11. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, “persons” as defined by 47 36. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 38. IE and its employees or agents are e... | win |
32,410 | 32. Plaintiffs have worked as call center employees for Defendants, along with thousands of other call center employees employed by Defendants, during the relevant limitations period prior to the filing of this action. 33. Plaintiffs’ job duties while employed included speaking via telephone with customers, former... | lose |
389,445 | 44. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if fully stated herein. 45. The FLSA requires employers to pay non-exempt employees at least the minimum wage for all hours worked, and an overtime premium of one and one half times their regular hourly rate for hours worked in excess of 40 hours in any one wor... | win |
254,325 | 12. Plaintiff is a natural person obligated, or allegedly obligated, to pay a debt owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due, a creditor other than Defendant. 13. Plaintiff’s obligation, or alleged obligation, owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due, a creditor other than Defendant, arises from a transaction ... | win |
416,225 | 17. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and on behalf of and all others similarly situated (“The Class and Subclass One”). 18. Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, The Class, consisting “of all persons within the United States who received any telephone call from Defendant to said person’s cellul... | win |
366,849 | 10. Defendant sought to collect a consumer debt from Plaintiff arising from a medical debt. The debt was incurred primarily for personal, household or family use. The debt was not incurred for any commercial purpose. 11. On or about June 16, 2016, Defendant mailed Plaintiff a demand letter seeking payment of ... | lose |
330,958 | (Unjust Enrichment) (Violation of Massachusetts Unfair Trade Practices Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A) 19. Plaintiff repeats and re-allege the allegations contained in the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein. 20. Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93 § 105(a) provides that: No person, firm, partnership, corporat... | lose |
14,146 | 19. Zipcar operates a car rental service in the State of California. Zipcar provides its customers with self-service vehicles located in both suburban and urban locales that may be 1 In California, Zipcar services are available in Arcata, Atherton, Camarillo, Chico, Claremont, Davis, Hayward, Irvine, La Verne, L... | lose |
90,713 | 10. According to data from the Federal Trade Commission's 2012 Consumer Sentinel Network report, Florida ranks No. 1 for identity theft among the 50 states, with 361.3 complaints per 100,000 people. That's 86 percent more than Georgia, which ranks a distant second. Also, nine of the top 10 metro areas for identity... | win |
332,116 | (Violations of the FDCPA) 11. The debt collection notices and/or letters/communications from Defendant, received by the Class, are to be evaluated by the objective standard of the hypothetical “least sophisticated consumer.” 12. There are questions of law and fact which are common to the Class and which pre... | win |
141,011 | PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) 1. Unusually large number of parties. 10. Existence of highly technical issues and proof. 2. Unusually large number of claims or defenses. 3. Factual issues are exceptionally complex 3. VALIDITY OR INFRINGEMENT OF THE SAME PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR TRADEMA... | lose |
315,656 | 11. Defendant owns and operates an oilfield services company that operates in this District and throughout Texas and does more than $500,000.00 in business per year. 12. Plaintiffs and Class Members worked as “field supervisors” for Defendant at various job sites in this District and throughout Texas. 13. Desp... | win |
443,880 | 2.1 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
144,467 | 26. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiffs’ cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 27. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiffs insuranc... | lose |
151,934 | 10. After approximately 90 days of placement with Yanfeng Automotive, Defendant informed Plaintiff that Yanfeng intended to proceed with hiring Plaintiff on a full time basis. 11. As part of its employment application process, Defendant requires full time employees such as Plaintiff to submit to a background chec... | lose |
330,238 | (Breach of Implied Contract) (Negligence) (State Consumer Protection Laws) (State Data Breach Notification Statutes) 16. Based on a public notice announcing the breach Trump published on September 29, 2015, and upon information and belief, from at least May 19, 2014 to June 2, 2015, unauthorized malware had... | lose |
144,038 | 10. Likewise, the TCPA prohibits the placement of calls to a recipient’s cell phone using an artificial or prerecorded voice and without the recipient’s prior express written consent. 11. According to findings by the Federal Communication Commission (“FCC”), the agency Congress vested with authority to issue regulatio... | lose |
335,152 | 2.0 guidelines; regularly check the accessibility of the website under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that the defendant’s website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on the def... | win |
324,949 | 21. Precision is a manufacturer of complex metal components primarily marketed to industrial and aerospace customers. The Company produces large structural investment castings, airfoil castings, forged components, aerostructures, and highly engineered fasteners for aerospace applications. The Company operates in t... | lose |
209,367 | 21. Starting in 2016, Plaintiff began receiving text messages on his cellular telephone from short-code telephone number 310-44 which stated they were from “Lexington Law.” 22. The messages were sent to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number xxx-xxx-5199. 23. Plaintiff is not a Lexington Law client or customer. ... | lose |
206,446 | 24. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 35. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all of the above paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully stated herein. 40. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the above paragraphs 1 through 34 ... | lose |
375,561 | 22. Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of all persons and entities that own ShoreTel common stock (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are defendants and their affiliates, immediate families, legal representatives, heirs, successor... | lose |
152,184 | 12. Samsung is one of the largest manufacturers of “Smart TVs,” which offer built-in internet connectivity, allow for web browsing, the installation of applications, and other advanced features. Samsung’s Smart TVs command a premium price of up to $200 over TVs without any “smart” capabilities.2 13. In step with... | lose |
235,125 | 30. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Plaintiff seeks to prosecute his FLSA claims individually and as a collective action on behalf of all persons who are or were formerly employed by Defendant as AMs at any time during the relevant period (the “Collective Action Members”). 31. Defendants are liable under the FLS... | win |
369,816 | 66. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein. 67. Plaintiffs have a right against wealth-based detention. In the pretrial detention context, courts have regularly found that setting arbitrary monetary release conditions that ... | lose |
353,904 | 38. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the aforementioned allegations as if restated fully herein word for word. 39. The foregoing acts and omissions of the Defendant and its’ agents constituted numerous and multiple violations of the FDCPA including, but not limited to, each and every one of the cited provisio... | lose |
15,686 | 17. Specifically, Plaintiff made a cash withdrawal from Defendant’s ATM at the following locations: (a) On or about September 1, 2012, Plaintiff made an electronic fund transfer at Defendant’s ATM located at 761 Highway 68, Sweetwater, Tennessee. Defendant charged Plaintiff a fee of $3.00 in connection with the... | lose |
113,941 | 14. The named Plaintiff is the subscriber and regular user of cellular telephone service for telephone number (404) 749-8857. 15. AIC has initiated telephone calls to Plaintiffs cellular telephone number. 16. Plaintiffhas never provided AIC with his cellular telephone number. 17. Plaintiffhas never provided AIC with... | lose |
159,849 | 22. XOMA is a biotech drug company that purports to discover and develop innovative antibody-based therapeutics. Its lead product candidate is gevokizumab, which the Company describes as “a proprietary potent, humanized allosteric-modulating monoclonal antibody that binds to the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1... | lose |
191,880 | 16. These calls were all in an effort to sell Defendant’s energy services to Plaintiff, making them advertisements and/or telemarketing. 17. Accordingly, Defendant was required to obtain prior express written consent prior to making these autodialed telemarketing calls. 18. Plaintiff never gave Defendant such ... | lose |
29,732 | (Deceptive Acts Or Practices, New York Gen. Bus. Law § 349) (False Advertising, New York Gen. Bus. Law § 350) 18. Plaintiff seeks to represent a class defined as all persons in the who purchased Pampers “natural clean” Wipes in the state of New York. 19. Members of the Class are so numerous that their individ... | lose |
105,247 | 10. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the Debt”). 11. The Debt was primarily for personal, family or household purposes and is therefore a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 12. Sometime after the incurrence of the Debt, Plaintiff fell behind on payments owed. 13. Thereafter, at an exact ... | win |
169,860 | 24. At all times relevant, Plaintiff is an individual residing within the State of California. 25. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all time relevant, Defendant conducted business in the State of California. 26. On or about April 2015, Plaintiff allegedly incurred financial obliga... | lose |
368,216 | 14. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the alleged Debt”). 15. The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household pu... | win |
414,662 | 27. Defendant offers the commercial website, www.chicagoknifeworks.com, to the public. The website offers features which should allow all consumers to access the -10- goods and services offered by the Defendant and which Defendant ensures delivery of such goods throughout the United States including New York State... | win |
98,959 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
257,722 | 51. Plaintiffs bring this action individually, and on behalf of all persons with mobility disabilities who use or will use the pedestrian right of way in the City of Seattle, as a class action under Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 61. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every all... | win |
4,381 | 27. Plaintiff, for himself and on behalf of others similarly situated, seeks class action certification pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(a) and 23 (b)(2) of all deaf and hard of hearing individuals in the United States who have been denied equal access to goods and services of the Defendant’... | lose |
113,041 | (12 NYCRR § 142-2.4: Spread of Hours Pay) (FLSA: Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation) (FLSA: Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation) (NYLL & NYCRR: Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation) (NYLL: Failure to Furnish Wage Notices) (NYLL: Failure to Furnish Wage Statements) (NYLL & NYCRR: Unpaid Minimum Wage) 10... | win |
107,074 | 10. Defendant employed Plaintiffs at all relevant times within the meaning of the FLSA. 29 U.S.C. § 203(g). 11. Plaintiffs were employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce. Defendant is a call center that takes calls from customers around the nation to troubleshoot d... | lose |
210,343 | (Collective Action Claim for Violations of the FLSA) (Individual Claim for Violations of the FLSA) 15. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges all previous paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully incorporated in this section. 16. Space Age had at all relevant times at least two employees that handle, sell, or o... | win |
311,165 | (Declaratory Relief) 112. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 111 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 113. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | lose |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.