id int64 4 458k | target_text stringlengths 33 45.8k ⌀ | verdict stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
241,844 | (California Invasion Of Privacy Act) 122. Plaintiffs incorporate all preceding paragraphs as though set forth herein. 41 (Stored Communications Act) (Violation of California's Common Law Right of Publicity) (Violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200) (Wiretap Act) 100. Plaintiffs incorporate each ofthe fo... | win |
26,738 | 10. Sunoco reiterates its promise of 5¢ off every gallon in the terms and conditions that accompany the company’s advertised offer. The terms and conditions unequivocally state: When you use your Sunoco Rewards Card to purchase fuel, the price you pay will be reduced by five cents ($.05) per gallon. For fuel pu... | lose |
113,054 | 22. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and as a class action on behalf of the following Fee Churning Class: All persons who filed a case under Title 11, Chapter 13 of the United States Code in the State of California in which the PHH Defendants filed an Objection to Confirmation asserting that the p... | lose |
326,266 | 26. Throughout his entire employment, Plaintiff was paid an hourly rate of $8 per hour in cash for the hours for which he was paid. 27. Defendants unlawfully failed to pay Plaintiff, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and Class members for all hours worked due to a policy of time-shaving. 28. Defendants unlawfully ... | lose |
303,794 | INDUCEMENT, AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD (AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS) ................................................................................................................47 COUNT III UNJUST ENRICHMENT (AGAINST AIG PARENT ONLY) ..............................48 ORGANIZATIONS ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(C) AND 18 U.S... | lose |
453,566 | (FLSA Overtime Violations) (Ohio Class) (Ohio Overtime Violations) 10. Defendant’s hourly employees included Plaintiff, the Potential Opt-Ins and members of the Ohio Class. 11. At all times relevant, Defendant was an enterprise within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 203(r), and an enterprise engaged in commerce ... | win |
126,309 | 10. For some or all of the calls, ANTHEM used an auto-dialing mechanism wherein there was no caller on the line when Plaintiff answered. After a pause on each of these calls, the call was connected to a person by Anthem. 11. These phone calls were, according to the callers, for marketing purposes. 12. When o... | win |
339,327 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.0 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | win |
245,291 | 11 33. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil 12 Procedure, individually and on behalf of the Class. The Class specifically excludes Defendants 13 herein, and any person, finn, trust, corporation or other entity related to, or affiliated with, any of 14 15 the Defendants. 16 17 ... | win |
86,208 | 10. Defendant called Plaintiff on her cellular telephone with enough frequency to constitute harassment under the circumstance. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 12. Defendant’s calls were placed to telephone number assigned to a cell... | win |
135,437 | 19. Defendants are “person[s]” as the term is defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 20. The Plaintiff’s phone number ending in 1901, has been on the National Do Not Call List since prior to January 1, 2020. 21. The number has a Virginia area code. 22. The number is used by the Plaintiff for personal purposes. 2... | lose |
317,593 | 20. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant between approximately 1999 and November 12, 2019. 21. Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a production employee. 23. After extracting the base metal, Plaintiff poured the extracted metal into molds. 24. After transferring the material to the molds, Plaintiff removed t... | lose |
102,080 | 38. All Web Leads generated the “leads” by placing telemarketing robocalls to consumers to see if they might be interested in purchasing insurance, and then transferring those calls to the Defendants. 39. On behalf of Defendants and at their direction, All Web Leads made hundreds of thousands of autodialed telem... | lose |
160,102 | 24. From approximately the years 2012 to 2016, Plaintiff was employed by Defendant. 25. In approximately August 2017, Defendant re-hired Plaintiff as a Food & Nutrition Aid working in Defendant’s Food & Nutrition Department. 26. Plaintiff is still currently employment with Defendant. 27. During Plaintiff’s ... | win |
414,250 | 27. Performance provides transportation and logistics services to the oil and gas industry. 28. In order to create the goods, and provide the services, it markets to its customers, Performance employs personnel like Sonia and the Putative Class Members. 29. These workers carry out the hands-on, day-to-day produ... | lose |
291,115 | 55. This action is brought as a class action. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 56. The identities of all class members are readily ascertainable from the records of Financial Recove... | win |
101,566 | - 2 - 11. This Action is properly maintained as a class action. The Class consists of: All New Jersey consumers who were sent letters and/or notices from Tate & Kirlin Associates, concerning a debt owed to ADT Security Systems, Inc., which: a. used a symbol and/or a string of numbers on or visible through the... | win |
109,318 | 20. Plaintiff Ashlyn Meeks sued Trans Union and settled with Trans Union. On or about November 20, 2019, Ms. Meeks attempted to access her credit file disclosure through the www.annualcreditreport.com website. The website did not return a credit file disclosure, but rather the following message: “Unfortunately, you... | lose |
26,185 | 20. At all times relevant hereto, Defendants' primary business was and is the sale of food and drinks for consumption. 2 1 . Each of the Corporate Defendants constitute a "restaurant" within the meaning of the New York Labor Law. 22. Defendant, MAURY RUBlN, actively participates in the day-to -day operation of... | win |
431,611 | 26. Plaintiffs bring the First Cause of Action, pursuant to FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons who work or have worked for Hertz as LMs at Defendant’s airport locations during the Relevant Period (the “FLSA Collective”). 27. All of the work that Plaintiffs and the... | lose |
384,301 | 13. On or about December 27, 2016, New Leaf Recovery Services, P.C., received the unsolicited fax advertisement attached as Exhibit A on its facsimile machine, from “Curexa.” 14. Discovery may reveal the transmission of additional faxes as well. 15. Defendants are responsible for sending or causing the sending... | win |
261,073 | 24. Defendant’s text messages were transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text messages constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff various p... | lose |
375,071 | 11.Plaintiff and those similarly situated are all employees within the meaning of Section 23(e) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. Section 203(e). Plaintiff is a covered employee within the meaning of the FLSA, and Ohio statutory law. 12.Defendant Nida’s is an employer within the meaning of Section 3(d) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. ... | lose |
78,507 | 10. On information and belief, part of Defendant’s strategy for increasing its sales is to engage in telemarketing. In their zeal to market though, they systematically called consumers who did not consent to receive telemarketing calls and who were registered on the do not call registry. 11. Defendant made (and... | lose |
299,392 | 17. Defendant operates a nationwide chain of upscale bar/restaurants called Bar Louie. 18. Defendant employs bartenders to provide services to its restaurant patrons. 19. Plaintiff is currently employed as a bartender at Defendant’s San Antonio, Texas Bar Louie restaurant. Plaintiff was hired on or about M... | win |
135,602 | 13. Plaintiff brings this action as a state wide class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “FRCP”), on behalf of himself and all Kansas consumers and their successors in interest (the “Class”), who have received debt collection letters, and/or notices from the Defendants... | lose |
330,001 | 22. Defendant alleges Plaintiff owes a debt (“the alleged Debt”). 23. The alleged Debt is an alleged obligation of Plaintiff to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household pu... | lose |
443,385 | 17. On or about January 11, 2016, Doherty began receiving telephone calls from Defendant on his cellular telephone ending with “7814.” 18. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s calls were made via an “automatic telephone dialing system” (“ATDS”), as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1). 49. Plaintiff repeats, re-... | lose |
373,744 | 10. Plaintiff alleges that at all times relevant herein Defendant conducted business in the State of California, County of San Diego, and within this judicial district. 11. Sometime prior to December of 2016, Plaintiff allegedly incurred debts to Defendant for an account ending in 9942 and an account ending in 439... | lose |
4 | 10. Defendant’s message constituted “telephone solicitation” as defined by the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(4) and “unsolicited advertisement” as defined by the TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(5). 11. Defendant used a “telephone facsimile machine” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(3) to place its message to Plaintiff seekin... | lose |
137,314 | 20. Defendant is a property rental company that owns and operates www.vacasa.com (its “Website”), offering features which should allow all consumers to access the goods and services throughout the United States, including New York State. 21. Defendant’s Website offers rental properties to the public, and offers f... | win |
250,695 | 20. Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) on behalf of a Class consisting of all persons who purchased the common stock of SandRidge during the Class Period and who were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, the officers and ... | lose |
300,523 | 12. Plaintiff brings claims for relief as a collective action pursuant to FLSA Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of all non-exempt employees, including cooks, food preparers, dishwashers, cashiers, hosts/hostesses, porters, bartenders, barbacks, servers, runners, 6 bussers and delivery persons, employed... | win |
392,455 | 13. The United States Government Accountability Office noted in a June 2007 report on Data Breaches (“GAO Report”) that identity thieves use identifying data such as SSNs to open financial accounts, receive government benefits and incur charges and credit in a person’s name.1 As the GAO Report states, this type of ... | lose |
13,649 | 14. At all relevant times, Plaintiff worked as a Membership Advisor for Defendant in Defendant’s Meriden location. Plaintiff and the other Membership Advisors were scheduled for forty-five (45) hours per week, but frequently worked more than forty-five (45) hours. 15. Plaintiff and Membership Advisors were paid... | win |
435,624 | 18. At all relevant times, Plaintiff and the other FLSA Collective Plaintiffs are and have been similarly situated, have had substantially similar job requirements and pay provisions, and are and have been subjected to Defendants’ decisions, policies, plans, programs, practices, procedures, protocols, routines, and... | win |
39,385 | 21. Defendant is a bar and lounge that operates its bar and lounge as well as the Website to the public. The bar and lounge is located at 9532 Queens Boulevard, Rego Park, New York. Defendant’s bar and lounge constitutes a place of public accommodation. Defendant’s bar and lounge provides to the public important g... | lose |
176,109 | 14. Within the last year, CRE began placing automated text messages to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, number (765) XXX-8930. 15. The messages were sent from SMS short code 69273. 16. The messages advised Plaintiff that he should “Reply STOP to opt out.” 17. In accordance with the messages’ instructions, Pla... | win |
397,134 | (Count I: 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)(1)) 11. Several courts have held that prospective, blanket certifications obtained by a consumer reporting agency from a user do not comply with 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b) because they run counter to Section 1681b(b)(1)’s use of the phrase “has complied,” which refers retrospectively to... | lose |
155,503 | 29. Just For Men® is a cosmetic hair care and dye product line intended to improve and alter hair and facial hair color. 86. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and as a representative of all others who are similarly situated. Pursuant to Rules 23(a), (b)(2), and/or (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of ... | lose |
135,234 | 1. The amount of the debt… 11. Plaintiff brings this claim on behalf of the following class, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 12. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of Tennessee; b. to whom Defendant ProCollect sent an initial letter; c. attempting to collec... | lose |
101,879 | On or about December 26, 2019 Plaintiff purchased the Policy, which purports to be issued by both Nationwide and Allied. The additional named insureds under the Policy are: | lose |
159,086 | 17. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 18. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of Texas; b. to whom Defendant KMDA sent a letter attempting to collect a consumer debt; c. that stated that • “Unless... | win |
280,407 | (Violations of the Dodd-Frank Act) (Violations of the FDCPA) 10. This Class satisfies all the requirements of FRCP Rule 23 for maintaining a class action. 11 . The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Upon information and belief, hundreds of persons have received debt collection notices... | win |
104,389 | 13. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, “persons” as defined by 47 38. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 39. Plaintiff represents, and is a membe... | win |
255,125 | 12. Elevate admits plaintiffs purport to bring this action as a class action, but denies it meets the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. 13. Elevate denies the allegations in ¶ 13. 13 (sic). Elevate repeats and reiterates its answer to the allegations in ¶¶ 1 through 13 as if same were set forth herein at leng... | lose |
338,752 | 12. It has been estimated that there are between 2.7 and 5.2 million people in the United States infected with Hepatitis-C. The virus is transmitted by coming into contact with infected blood, such as shared needles, a blood transfusion, or sexual contact. Left untreated, it can lead to cirrhosis or liver cancer, ... | lose |
186,733 | (Violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 Promulgated Thereunder Against All Defendants) (Violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act Against The Individual Defendants) 18. CBS is a mass media company with operations in the entertainment, cable networks, publishing, and local media segm... | lose |
263,615 | 10. Defendant made the Call to Plaintiff to sell its lending services. 11. Defendant made the Call using an autodialer. 12. Defendant made the Call using an artificial or pre-recorded voice. 13. Plaintiff has never given Defendant express consent to allow Defendant to call Plaintiff on his cellular telephone... | lose |
51,188 | 10. Upon information and belief, on or about February 7, 2018 Defendants, without Plaintiff’s express invitation or permission, arranged for and/or caused a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send unsolicited fax advertisements (hereinafter “the fax advertisements”), advertising the commercial... | lose |
265,763 | 11. In an effort to increase collections on alleged debtor accounts, Defendant has made thousands of unsolicited phone calls to consumers nationwide. Many of these calls were placed to non-debtors. Most, if not all, of the calls featured a prerecorded voice. 12. As part of Defendant’s debt collection process, D... | win |
279,178 | 10. Defendant contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone numbers confirmed to belong to Defendant, including and not necessarily limited to (424) 332-5843. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 12. Defendant’s calls ... | win |
81,725 | 14. On August 19, 2016, Samsung released to the market its highly touted, high-end, flagship smartphone, the Galaxy Note7, which sells for approximately $850. Shortly after the smartphones’ highly anticipated release, however, reports began to surface that the new smartphones were overheating and “exploding” in t... | lose |
439,395 | 1. The foregoing paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth in their entirety. 1.5 times their regular rate of pay for each hour that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek. 12. The foregoing paragraphs are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 13. Named Plaintiff brings this action f... | win |
47,686 | 10. Wells Fargo is unjustly enriched by these practices, as the firm receives the benefits and services of the New FAs for wages below minimum wage while providing little or no meaningful training to the New FAs. Worse, after terminating the employment of these new 3 https://www.wellsfargo.com/press/2009/20090101_... | win |
316,461 | 14. Defendant Global 7 Environmental, Health & Safety Corporation provides safety and environmental monitoring services to its customers in the energy and manufacturing sectors. 15. Plaintiff worked for Defendant as a safety representative from approximately November of 2018 to January of 2020. 16. Plaintiff w... | lose |
450,433 | 11. After his in-person interview, Plaintiff was preliminarily hired for the position to the results of his Criminal background check. 12. Plaintiff has no criminal history. 13. Having no criminal history, he did not anticipate any problem with his background report. 14. On September 19, 2015, Plaintiff ... | win |
456,654 | 20. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“The Class”). 21. Plaintiff represents, and is a member of, “The Class” defined as follows: “All persons in California whose outbound telephone conversations were recorded without their consent by Defendant wi... | lose |
40,444 | 12. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a citizen of the State of California. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 43. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“the Class”). 44. Plaintiff represents, and is a memb... | win |
367,073 | 13. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by a recently discovered novel coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 (“Coronavirus” or “COVID-19”). The first instances of the disease spreading to humans were diagnosed in or around December 2019. 14. According to the World Health Organization (“WHO”): “People can catch ... | lose |
138,144 | 10. On September 10, 2019, Plaintiff patronized one of Defendant Jam’n’s coffee shops located in Grand Rapids, Michigan while he was in the city on business. 11. Plaintiff’s decided to patronize Jam’n’s establishment, in part, in order to access a WiFi network. 12. Although Jam’n provided a WiFi network for us... | lose |
260,669 | 11. Defendant Real Value is a wholesale pharmacy supplier offering prescription pharmaceuticals, including name brand and generic drugs. 12. On information and belief, Defendant Real Value does business as Hospital Pharmaceutical Consulting or HPC RX. 13. Defendant Real Property is licensed in Illinois as an a... | lose |
446,835 | 10. Defendant is regularly engaged, for profit, in the collection of debts allegedly owed by consumers. 11. The principal purpose of Defendant's business is the collection of such debts. 12. Defendant uses the mails in its debt collection business. 13. Defendant is a “debt collector” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 169... | win |
279,727 | 17. Plaintiff Harris is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a “person” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 153(39). 19. Beginning at least as early as December 2015, American Express repeatedly called Harris’s cellular telephone. Harris received repeated, harassing calls at all hours of the day. 20. The majority... | lose |
84,989 | [Violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Business & Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq.) By Plaintiff and all Class Members Against All Defendants] [Violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civil Code §§1750 et seq.) By Plaintiff and Purchaser and Upgrade CLRA Class Members agains... | lose |
457,116 | 15. Plaintiff is a current employee of Defendant as an at-home VQA. 16. The position of VQA does not require any specific certifications, licensures, or education. In fact, only a high school diploma is required for the position. See Career Opportunity Job Posting, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 17. Defendant ... | lose |
239,347 | 49. Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the Collective Members, realleges and incorporate by reference all allegations in all preceding paragraphs. 50. On or around March 31, 2019, Plaintiff began employment with Defendants as a cashier and server. 51. Plaintiff’s primary job duties included seating customer... | lose |
398,898 | 45. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein. 46. Plaintiffs and Class members used Alexa Devices in their residences or otherwise had their private conversations overheard, recorded, intercepted, or monitored by an Alexa Device. 47. When Plaintiffs and Class ... | lose |
17,892 | 19. SignPost offers customer relationship management software for businesses. 20. To generate new customers, SignPost relies on telemarketing. 21. One of SignPost’s strategies for telemarketing involves the use of automatic telephone dialing system to solicit business. 22. This includes using a pre-loaded li... | win |
361,239 | 11. In addition, the TCPA prohibits making “any call” using “an artificial or prerecorded voice” to a wireless number. 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). 12. According to findings by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), such calls are prohibited because autodialed and prerecorded telephone calls are a grea... | lose |
167,010 | 11. Defendant JGAI is a real estate agency that contracts with individuals to assist them in buying and selling properties. The calls at issue in this case were made on behalf of, for the benefit of, and with the knowledge and approval of 26. Plaintiff Gindin is the owner and customary user of a telephone number ... | lose |
213,999 | 2.0 guidelines; c. Regularly test user accessibility by blind or vision-impaired persons to ensure that Defendant’s Website complies under the WCAG 2.1 guidelines; and, d. Develop an accessibility policy that is clearly disclosed on Defendant’s Websites, with contact information for users to report accessibil... | lose |
56,244 | (Forced fee deductions violate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First and Fourteenth Amendments) (State tort law of conversion of property for replevin and restitution of property) 53. Plaintiffs bring this class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. (b)(3). The class includes all individuals employed by an Oregon public empl... | lose |
331,140 | 25. On or about August 8, 2018, Defendant called Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in 6305 (“6305 Number”) with a prerecorded message. 26. Upon Plaintiff answering the phone, a prerecorded message stated the following: “this is an important message from Mr. Cooper, your home loan company, please call ... | win |
172,950 | (Declaratory Relief) 115. Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 114 of this Complaint as though set forth at length herein. 116. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties in that Plaintiff contends, and is informed and ... | lose |
429,557 | 20. Plaintiff, the FLSA Class Members, and the North Dakota Class Members worked for Defendant as a Chemical Van Operator. 22. Plaintiff worked in excess of 8 hours per day, and well over 40 hours per week. A Chemical Van Operator typically works a 12 hour shift at the well site, 7 days a week for a total workweek of ... | win |
159,144 | (Violation of New York State Civil Rights Law, NY CLS Civ R, Article 4 (CLS Civ R § 40 et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York Subclass) (Violation of New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-102, et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York Subclass) (Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 12181... | lose |
194,906 | (Failure to Pay Overtime Wages – FLSA, Brought by Plaintiffs on Behalf of Themselves and the FLSA Collective Plaintiffs) (Failure to Provide Accurate Pay Statements – NYLL § 195(3) Brought by Plaintiffs on Behalf of Themselves and the Class) (Failure to Pay Wages and Overtime Wages – NYLL, Brought by Plaintiffs ... | win |
406,816 | 13. A relatively inexpensive type of marketing involves advertising through Short Message Services. The term “Short Message Services” or “SMS” describes a messaging system that allows cellphone subscribers to use their cellphones to send and receive short text messages, usually limited to 160 characters. 14. An ... | lose |
402,662 | 24. Defendant’s text message was transmitted to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone, and within the time frame relevant to this action. 25. Defendant’s text message constitute telemarketing because they encouraged the future purchase or investment in property, goods, or services, i.e., selling Plaintiff leads for ge... | win |
209,832 | 10. Great American Power has violated, and continues to violate, the TCPA and its implementing regulations by placing, or having placed on its behalf, prerecorded calls to residential telephone subscribers (a) who have not expressly consented to receiving such calls and/or (b) who have expressly requested not to re... | win |
370,022 | 14. Mr. Diamond is a public-school teacher in the Chichester School District, where he has taught since 1990. Mr. Diamond refuses to join the PSEA or its affiliates because he disapproves of their political advocacy as well as the excessive salaries paid to even low-ranking members of the state union and its nationa... | lose |
79,291 | (Unjust Enrichment) (Violation of Massachusetts Unfair Trade Practices Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A) 18. Plai~tiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations contained in the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein. 19. Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93 § 105(a) provides that: No person, firm, partnership, corporation or oth... | win |
388,512 | 14. Defendant Exit Realty is a real estate agent or brokerage. 15. Defendant John Doe 1 is an authorized agent of Defendant Exit Realty. 16. As a way to cut corners yet also increase its advertising reach, Defendant and its authorized agents, including John Doe 1, repeatedly called thousands of cellular and res... | lose |
187,271 | 10. This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 and the FLSA and the authority to grant declaratory relief under the FLSA pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2201 et seq. 11. During Plaintiff’s employment with Dynamex, Dynamex earned more than $500,000.00 per year in gross sales. 12. Du... | win |
167,274 | 11. Defendants allege Plaintiff owes a debt (“the Debt”). 12. The Debt was primarily for personal, family or household purposes and is therefore a “debt” as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5). 13. Sometime after the incurrence of the Debt Plaintiff fell behind on payments owed. 14. Thereafter, at an exact ti... | win |
152,424 | 30. This action is properly maintainable as a class action. 31. The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. As of February 28, 2011, Central Vermont had 13,361,029 shares of common stock outstanding. Members of the Class are scattered throughout the United States and are so numerous th... | win |
158,517 | 10. Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system”, as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its calls to Plaintiff seeking to sell or solicit its business services. 11. Defendant’s calls constituted calls that were not for emergency purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). 12. Defendant’... | lose |
162,174 | (Violation of New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-102, et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York Subclass) (Violation of New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law, Article 15 (Executive Law § 292 et seq.) (on behalf of Plaintiff and New York Subclass) (Violation of 42 U.S.C... | lose |
397,263 | 13. Plaintiff brings this Class action on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 14. The Class which Plaintiff seeks to represent is defined as: All consumers to whom Defendant, within two years from the date of fi... | win |
53,017 | 53. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference and re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in each and every preceding paragraph of this Complaint, as though fully set forth herein. 54. The Defendants violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. chap. 407 (“MMPA”), by systematically using ... | lose |
370,926 | ) COMPLAINT-CLASS ACTION in her official capacity, ) | lose |
310,165 | 10. Plaintiffs bring this claim on behalf of the following case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3). 11. The Class consists of: a. all individuals with addresses in the State of New York; b. to whom Defendant sent a response to a consumer’s dispute; c. that deceptively and misleadingly fails to cl... | win |
6,401 | 22. America’s lending industry has divorced itself from the borrowers it once served. 23. Among other things, securitization has created an industry of companies in the lending industry who no longer make money primarily from interest on the loans they originate. Thus, lenders no longer have the financial intere... | win |
27,337 | VIOLATIONS OF WASHINGTON’S MEAL AND REST PERIOD REQUIREMENTS RCW 49.12.020 AND WAC 296-126-092 (On behalf of the Washington Class Representative and the Washington Class) 20. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees as authorized under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).... | win |
250,930 | 66. Plaintiff incorporates each preceding paragraph as if fully set forth herein. 67. Plaintiff and each member of the Class is a “Consumer” as that term is defined by Cal. Civ. Code § 1761(d). 68. The Products are a “Good” as that term is defined by Cal. Civ. Code § 1761(a). 81. Plaintiff incorporates all... | win |
416,719 | 14. “Capital One is a diversified bank that offers a broad array of financial products and services to consumers, small businesses and commercial clients. A Fortune 500 company, Capital One has one of the most widely recognized brands in America. As one of the nation’s top 10 largest banks based upon deposits, Ca... | win |
145,243 | 10. Plaintiff opened and used her Citi Preferred Card account for personal, family or household purposes. Plaintiff did not open the account for business purposes. 11. Plaintiff did not answer the phone call from P&B, which went to voicemail. 12. P&B’s employee left a voicemail message for Plaintiff. The voicem... | lose |
263,590 | 19. Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, as a member of the proposed class (hereafter “The Class”) defined as follows: All persons in the United States whose bank accounts were debited on a reoccurring basis by Defendant without Defendant obtaining a written ... | lose |
376,799 | 103. Plaintiffs ask the Court to grant the remedy of restitution to themselves and to all members of the class who made payments to Chase for Payment Protector. The Plaintiffs ask the Court to grant the following relief: a) a refund of all Payment Protector payments made to Chase; b) a refund to any consumer who... | lose |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.