id stringlengths 6 9 | text stringlengths 14 8.58k | answer stringclasses 5
values | query stringlengths 856 9.42k | choices list | gold int64 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCS900 | 2) The Triangle Capital Corporation Peer Group consists of the following companies: Apollo Investment Corporation, Ares Capital Corporation, BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation, Fidus Investment Corporation, Fifth Street Finance Corp., Gladstone Investment Corporation, Gladstone Capital Corporation, Golub Capital BDC, Inc, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation, Hercules Capital Inc, KCAP Financial, Inc, Main Street Capital Corporation, Medley Capital Corporation, New Mountain Finance Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation, Prospect Capital Corporation, Solar Capital Ltd. and THL Credit, In | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
2) The Triangle Capital Corporation Peer Group consists of the following companies: Apollo Investment Corporation, Ares Capital Corporation, BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation, Fidus Investment Corporation, Fifth Street Finance Corp., Gladstone Investment Corporation, Gladstone Capital Corporation, Golub Capital BDC, Inc, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation, Hercules Capital Inc, KCAP Financial, Inc, Main Street Capital Corporation, Medley Capital Corporation, New Mountain Finance Corporation, PennantPark Investment Corporation, Prospect Capital Corporation, Solar Capital Ltd. and THL Credit, In
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS901 | Mister Greene serves as a member of the board of directors of Acorda Therapeutics, Inc, a biotechnology company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Greene serves as a member of the board of directors of Acorda Therapeutics, Inc, a biotechnology company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS902 | Our foreign financial depositories are Bank of America, China Construction Bank, China Agricultural Bank, China Commercial and Industrial Bank, HSBC; HSBC in India, Argentina and UK; TD Bank Canada; Banco do Brasil, S.A. and Banco Ita S.A. in Brasil; Banco Credito Inversione in Chile; Banco Mercantil Del Norte SA in Mexico; ZAO KB Citibank Moscow in Russia and JSC Bank Centercredit in Kazakhstan. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our foreign financial depositories are Bank of America, China Construction Bank, China Agricultural Bank, China Commercial and Industrial Bank, HSBC; HSBC in India, Argentina and UK; TD Bank Canada; Banco do Brasil, S.A. and Banco Ita S.A. in Brasil; Banco Credito Inversione in Chile; Banco Mercantil Del Norte SA in Mexico; ZAO KB Citibank Moscow in Russia and JSC Bank Centercredit in Kazakhstan.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS903 | Before becoming President and Chief Executive Officer of Safety Components International in October2000, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Before becoming President and Chief Executive Officer of Safety Components International in October2000, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS904 | In 2013, important engagements with NVIDIA and Intel occurred in the areas of accelerator technology and graphics processing unit computing, and parallel scaling in excess of 10,000 cores was demonstrated with Cray. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2013, important engagements with NVIDIA and Intel occurred in the areas of accelerator technology and graphics processing unit computing, and parallel scaling in excess of 10,000 cores was demonstrated with Cray.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS905 | The following is a list of key business partners: Access Softek, Inc Accuity, Inc Actuate Corp. CardinalCommerce Clickatell Experian Information Solutions, Inc FairCom Corporation Fiserv, Inc Fidelity National Information Services, Inc Guardian Analytics Hewlett-Packard Company International Business Machines Corporation Ingenico Group Integrated Research Limited Intuit, Inc iovation Jack Henry & Associates, Inc Lean Software Services, Inc LivePerson Inc Microsoft Corporation Micro Focus Inc Monex Deposit Company Monex Financial Services Limited Neustar, Inc Oracle USA, Inc Panintelligence Paragon Application Systems, Inc PayPal IATA - Perseuss ProfessortStars Jack Henry & Associates, Inc Quota Inc Red Hat, Inc RSA Security LLC, the Security Division of EMC Corporation Spectrum Message Services Pty Ltd Symantec Corporation TIBCO Software Inc Truaxis, Inc a MasterCard Company ThreatMetrix, Inc Services We offer our customers a wide range of professional services, including analysis, design, development, implementation, integration and training. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The following is a list of key business partners: Access Softek, Inc Accuity, Inc Actuate Corp. CardinalCommerce Clickatell Experian Information Solutions, Inc FairCom Corporation Fiserv, Inc Fidelity National Information Services, Inc Guardian Analytics Hewlett-Packard Company International Business Machines Corporation Ingenico Group Integrated Research Limited Intuit, Inc iovation Jack Henry & Associates, Inc Lean Software Services, Inc LivePerson Inc Microsoft Corporation Micro Focus Inc Monex Deposit Company Monex Financial Services Limited Neustar, Inc Oracle USA, Inc Panintelligence Paragon Application Systems, Inc PayPal IATA - Perseuss ProfessortStars Jack Henry & Associates, Inc Quota Inc Red Hat, Inc RSA Security LLC, the Security Division of EMC Corporation Spectrum Message Services Pty Ltd Symantec Corporation TIBCO Software Inc Truaxis, Inc a MasterCard Company ThreatMetrix, Inc Services We offer our customers a wide range of professional services, including analysis, design, development, implementation, integration and training.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS906 | Viad Business Units Viad is built around two operating groups which are leading competitors in their businesses, including companies engaged in payment services (Travelers Express Company, Inc, MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc, and Game Financial Corporation), and convention and event services (GES Exposition Services, Inc and the Exhibitgroup/ Giltspur division). | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Viad Business Units Viad is built around two operating groups which are leading competitors in their businesses, including companies engaged in payment services (Travelers Express Company, Inc, MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc, and Game Financial Corporation), and convention and event services (GES Exposition Services, Inc and the Exhibitgroup/ Giltspur division).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS907 | Competition Our main competitors include firms like SAP, Oracle, Development Dimensions International, Center for Creative Leadership, Right Management, and SHL, a subsidiary of Corporate Executive Board. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition Our main competitors include firms like SAP, Oracle, Development Dimensions International, Center for Creative Leadership, Right Management, and SHL, a subsidiary of Corporate Executive Board.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS908 | During our 2006 fiscal year, Celera made significant progress in its proteomic studies of pancreatic, lung, colon, breast, kidney, and gastric cancer, and initiated studies of additional cancers including prostate cancer, liver cancer, and melanoma, a type of skin cancer. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
During our 2006 fiscal year, Celera made significant progress in its proteomic studies of pancreatic, lung, colon, breast, kidney, and gastric cancer, and initiated studies of additional cancers including prostate cancer, liver cancer, and melanoma, a type of skin cancer.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS909 | Estimated Fair Value after Hypothetical Change in Interest Rates (bp = basis points) Carrying Fair 100 bp 100 bp Value Value decrease increase MidAmerican Energy fixed-rate long-term debt: As of December 31, 2009 $ 2,675 $ 2,858 $ 3,095 $ 2,653 As of December 31, 2008 $ 2,675 $ 2,690 $ 2,925 $ 2,487 MidAmerican Funding fixed-rate long-term debt: As of December 31, 2009 $ 525 $ 580 $ 626 $ 539 As of December 31, 2008 $ 700 $ 724 $ 769 $ 685 As of December31, 2009 and 2008, MidAmerican Energy had floating-rate obligations totaling $195million and $652million, respectively, that expose MidAmerican Energy to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Estimated Fair Value after Hypothetical Change in Interest Rates (bp = basis points) Carrying Fair 100 bp 100 bp Value Value decrease increase MidAmerican Energy fixed-rate long-term debt: As of December 31, 2009 $ 2,675 $ 2,858 $ 3,095 $ 2,653 As of December 31, 2008 $ 2,675 $ 2,690 $ 2,925 $ 2,487 MidAmerican Funding fixed-rate long-term debt: As of December 31, 2009 $ 525 $ 580 $ 626 $ 539 As of December 31, 2008 $ 700 $ 724 $ 769 $ 685 As of December31, 2009 and 2008, MidAmerican Energy had floating-rate obligations totaling $195million and $652million, respectively, that expose MidAmerican Energy to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS910 | The segments primary competitors are Access Oil Tools; Aker Solutions AS; American Block; Bomco; Canrig (a division of Nabors Industries); Cavins Oil Tools; Cameron; DenCon Oil Tools; Forum Oilfield Technologies; General Electric; Hitec Doctor lling Products; Hong Hua; Huisman; Global Energy Services; M&I Electric; Tesco Corporation; Stewart& Stevenson, Inc; Huntings, Ltd.; Vanoil; Parveen Industries; Soilmec; TTS Sense; Omron; Bentec; Blohm; Voss; Liebher; Seatrax; McGregor; Rolls Royce and Weatherford International, Inc Management believes that the principal competitive factors affecting its Rig Technology segment are performance, quality, reputation, customer service, availability of products, spare parts, and consumables, breadth of product line and price. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The segments primary competitors are Access Oil Tools; Aker Solutions AS; American Block; Bomco; Canrig (a division of Nabors Industries); Cavins Oil Tools; Cameron; DenCon Oil Tools; Forum Oilfield Technologies; General Electric; Hitec Doctor lling Products; Hong Hua; Huisman; Global Energy Services; M&I Electric; Tesco Corporation; Stewart& Stevenson, Inc; Huntings, Ltd.; Vanoil; Parveen Industries; Soilmec; TTS Sense; Omron; Bentec; Blohm; Voss; Liebher; Seatrax; McGregor; Rolls Royce and Weatherford International, Inc Management believes that the principal competitive factors affecting its Rig Technology segment are performance, quality, reputation, customer service, availability of products, spare parts, and consumables, breadth of product line and price.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS911 | We have made estimates of our continuing obligations on several agreements, including our collaborations with ATL, Amgen, Chiron, ITRI, Lilly and the Singapore EDB. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have made estimates of our continuing obligations on several agreements, including our collaborations with ATL, Amgen, Chiron, ITRI, Lilly and the Singapore EDB.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS912 | c) Reflects the business combination with COMSAT Corporation effective August 2000. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
c) Reflects the business combination with COMSAT Corporation effective August 2000.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS913 | We consider our primary competitors with respect to our power management products to include Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, Linear Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Advanced Analogic Technologies, and Monolithic Power Systems. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We consider our primary competitors with respect to our power management products to include Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, Linear Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Advanced Analogic Technologies, and Monolithic Power Systems.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS914 | He is a director of Terex Corporation, a diversified global manufacturer of a variety of machinery products, and Standex International Corporation, a manufacturer of products and services for diverse industrial market segments. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
He is a director of Terex Corporation, a diversified global manufacturer of a variety of machinery products, and Standex International Corporation, a manufacturer of products and services for diverse industrial market segments.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS915 | We have established relationships and trained professionals at a number of systems integrators including: Cap Gemini, Accenture, IBM Global Services, Ness Technologies, Tata Consultancy Services, HCL Technologies, Wipro Systems, Infosys, Cognizant, and Patni. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have established relationships and trained professionals at a number of systems integrators including: Cap Gemini, Accenture, IBM Global Services, Ness Technologies, Tata Consultancy Services, HCL Technologies, Wipro Systems, Infosys, Cognizant, and Patni.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS916 | The assets that remain at IDI include an equity interest in one commercial real estate property and one real estate development along with various notes receivable. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The assets that remain at IDI include an equity interest in one commercial real estate property and one real estate development along with various notes receivable.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS917 | We also have an agreement with American Express allowing its cardholders to convert their Membership Reward points into TrueBlue points. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We also have an agreement with American Express allowing its cardholders to convert their Membership Reward points into TrueBlue points.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS918 | Mister Ng serves on the Board of Directors of Mattel,Inc and served for six years as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Los Angeles Branch. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Ng serves on the Board of Directors of Mattel,Inc and served for six years as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Los Angeles Branch.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS919 | As of June 30, 2010, theamount owed to the Company by Mentor Graphicswas $87,000 and no amountswere owed to Mentor Graphics by the Company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As of June 30, 2010, theamount owed to the Company by Mentor Graphicswas $87,000 and no amountswere owed to Mentor Graphics by the Company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS920 | During the second quarter of 2011, Moodys upgraded the Class C notes and the Class D notes. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
During the second quarter of 2011, Moodys upgraded the Class C notes and the Class D notes.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS921 | Our advertising revenues include amounts charged to advertisers for space purchased in our newspapers, digital ads placed on our digital platforms, advertising and marketing services, other advertising products such as preprints and direct mail, and the provision and sale of online marketing services and products through our ReachLocal subsidiary. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our advertising revenues include amounts charged to advertisers for space purchased in our newspapers, digital ads placed on our digital platforms, advertising and marketing services, other advertising products such as preprints and direct mail, and the provision and sale of online marketing services and products through our ReachLocal subsidiary.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS922 | We also have a co-branded loyalty credit card jointly with Banco Santander Puerto Rico and Mastercard which allows customers in Puerto Rico to take full advantage of our TrueBlue loyalty program. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We also have a co-branded loyalty credit card jointly with Banco Santander Puerto Rico and Mastercard which allows customers in Puerto Rico to take full advantage of our TrueBlue loyalty program.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS923 | Competition Competitors for various products offered by us are found among certain divisions or product lines of large, diversified companies such as Robert Bosch GmbH, Siemens AG, Denso Corporation, Analogue Devices, Danaher Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, BAE Systems PLC, Panasonic/Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Inc, and Rockwell Automation Inc There are smaller or product-specific companies, some of whose products compete with ours, including CTS Corporation, Doctor Johannes Heidenhain GmbH, Silicon Sensor International AG, Servo Magnetics Inc, Bourns, Inc and BI Technologies of TT Electronics PLC. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition Competitors for various products offered by us are found among certain divisions or product lines of large, diversified companies such as Robert Bosch GmbH, Siemens AG, Denso Corporation, Analogue Devices, Danaher Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, BAE Systems PLC, Panasonic/Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Inc, and Rockwell Automation Inc There are smaller or product-specific companies, some of whose products compete with ours, including CTS Corporation, Doctor Johannes Heidenhain GmbH, Silicon Sensor International AG, Servo Magnetics Inc, Bourns, Inc and BI Technologies of TT Electronics PLC.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS924 | Key partnership alliances of Open Text include Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, Deloitte, Accenture and Hitachi. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Key partnership alliances of Open Text include Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, Deloitte, Accenture and Hitachi.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS925 | However, our competitors such as IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems and Dell are generally far larger companies with much greater resources. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
However, our competitors such as IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems and Dell are generally far larger companies with much greater resources.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS926 | On April 30, 2003, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 10, 2003, as amended April 4, 2003, Synergy Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Webtronics merged into Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc (Synergy) and Callisto Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Webtronics merged into Old Callisto (collectively, the Merger). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On April 30, 2003, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 10, 2003, as amended April 4, 2003, Synergy Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Webtronics merged into Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc (Synergy) and Callisto Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Webtronics merged into Old Callisto (collectively, the Merger).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS927 | Our Energy and Mining segment contract backlog at December31, 2013 was $429.1 million, which represented a $188.3 million, or 78.2%, increase compared to December31, 2012. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our Energy and Mining segment contract backlog at December31, 2013 was $429.1 million, which represented a $188.3 million, or 78.2%, increase compared to December31, 2012.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS928 | Mister Garrett is also a director of Informatica Corporation and Model N, Inc MatthewThompson 56 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations Mister Thompson currently serves as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Garrett is also a director of Informatica Corporation and Model N, Inc MatthewThompson 56 Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations Mister Thompson currently serves as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS929 | Mister Cabot is also a director of Cabot Corporation and Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Cabot is also a director of Cabot Corporation and Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS930 | For example, Microsoft Corporation currently offers Microsoft Office Small Business Accounting and offers, in partnership with third parties, several other competitive products and services, including a payroll solution for small businesses, credit and debit card processing services, and business checks, forms envelopes and related printed products. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For example, Microsoft Corporation currently offers Microsoft Office Small Business Accounting and offers, in partnership with third parties, several other competitive products and services, including a payroll solution for small businesses, credit and debit card processing services, and business checks, forms envelopes and related printed products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS931 | For example, in January2012, we formed a new strategic alliance with Biogen Idec to develop and commercialize ISIS-SMNRxto treat spinal muscular atrophy. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For example, in January2012, we formed a new strategic alliance with Biogen Idec to develop and commercialize ISIS-SMNRxto treat spinal muscular atrophy.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS932 | The majority of the intersegment revenues and cost of revenues are between Travelocity and Sabre Travel Network, consisting mainly of incentives paid by Sabre Travel Network to Travelocity for transactions processed through the Sabre GDS, data processing fees paid by Travelocity to Sabre Travel Network for transactions processed through the Sabre GDS, transaction fees paid by Travelocity to Sabre Travel Network for transactions facilitated through the Sabre GDS in which the travel supplier pays Travelocity directly, and fees paid by Sabre Travel Network to Travelocity for corporate trips booked through the Travelocity online booking technology. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The majority of the intersegment revenues and cost of revenues are between Travelocity and Sabre Travel Network, consisting mainly of incentives paid by Sabre Travel Network to Travelocity for transactions processed through the Sabre GDS, data processing fees paid by Travelocity to Sabre Travel Network for transactions processed through the Sabre GDS, transaction fees paid by Travelocity to Sabre Travel Network for transactions facilitated through the Sabre GDS in which the travel supplier pays Travelocity directly, and fees paid by Sabre Travel Network to Travelocity for corporate trips booked through the Travelocity online booking technology.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS933 | Therefore, we have partnered with Biogen Idec for the joint development and commercialization of three Phase 2 antibodies daclizumab in MS and all indications not covered under the Roche agreements, M200 in all indications and HuZAF in all indications. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Therefore, we have partnered with Biogen Idec for the joint development and commercialization of three Phase 2 antibodies daclizumab in MS and all indications not covered under the Roche agreements, M200 in all indications and HuZAF in all indications.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS934 | District of Columbia Regulatory Matters District of Columbia Power Line Undergrounding Initiative (Exelon, PHI and Pepco). | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
District of Columbia Regulatory Matters District of Columbia Power Line Undergrounding Initiative (Exelon, PHI and Pepco).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS935 | Cat Financials competitors include Wells Fargo & Company; CitiCapital, a business unit of Citigroup, Inc; General Electric Capital Corporation; and various banks and finance companies. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Cat Financials competitors include Wells Fargo & Company; CitiCapital, a business unit of Citigroup, Inc; General Electric Capital Corporation; and various banks and finance companies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS936 | These arrangements include our IM Flash NAND Flash joint ventures with Intel, our Inotera DRAM joint venture with Nanya, our MP Mask joint venture with Photronics, our Transform joint venture with Origin Energy and our CMOS image sensor wafer supply agreement with Aptina. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These arrangements include our IM Flash NAND Flash joint ventures with Intel, our Inotera DRAM joint venture with Nanya, our MP Mask joint venture with Photronics, our Transform joint venture with Origin Energy and our CMOS image sensor wafer supply agreement with Aptina.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS937 | The alliance of Oracle and Open Text enables customers to fortify their existing investments in accounts payable invoice processing, and report and output management solutions from Oracle. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The alliance of Oracle and Open Text enables customers to fortify their existing investments in accounts payable invoice processing, and report and output management solutions from Oracle.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS938 | In accordance with this strategy, we have entered into alliances or relationships with, Bell Mobility, Cambridge Silicon Radio, Hitachi, Intermec, Microsoft, Nokia Corporation, Palm, SanDisk Corporation, Sprint PCS, Symbol Technologies, and Toshiba Corporation. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In accordance with this strategy, we have entered into alliances or relationships with, Bell Mobility, Cambridge Silicon Radio, Hitachi, Intermec, Microsoft, Nokia Corporation, Palm, SanDisk Corporation, Sprint PCS, Symbol Technologies, and Toshiba Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS939 | In connection with the purchase of Conseco's and Centaur's limited partnership interest, we are in the process of amending and restating our existing credit facility to, among other things, increase borrowing availability to $400million. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In connection with the purchase of Conseco's and Centaur's limited partnership interest, we are in the process of amending and restating our existing credit facility to, among other things, increase borrowing availability to $400million.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS940 | With respect to our Power Management and High Reliability products, we consider our primary competitors to include Linear Technology Corporation, Maxim Integrated Products Inc, Microsemi Corporation, and Monolithic Power Systems Inc Our primary competitors with respect to our Wireless and Sensing products include Silicon Laboratories, Texas Instruments Inc, Atmel Corporation, Analog Devices Inc, and Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
With respect to our Power Management and High Reliability products, we consider our primary competitors to include Linear Technology Corporation, Maxim Integrated Products Inc, Microsemi Corporation, and Monolithic Power Systems Inc Our primary competitors with respect to our Wireless and Sensing products include Silicon Laboratories, Texas Instruments Inc, Atmel Corporation, Analog Devices Inc, and Cypress Semiconductor Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS941 | Time deposit growth increased to $517.4 million from $453.2 a year earlier, an increase of 14.2% from yearend 2004. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Time deposit growth increased to $517.4 million from $453.2 a year earlier, an increase of 14.2% from yearend 2004.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS942 | Mister McColl is a director of Cousins Properties, Inc and General Parts, Inc As of December31, 2004, Mister McColl beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, 43,411 shares of the Companys stock, including 26,600 shares that are subject to currently exercisable options granted by the Company under the 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister McColl is a director of Cousins Properties, Inc and General Parts, Inc As of December31, 2004, Mister McColl beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, 43,411 shares of the Companys stock, including 26,600 shares that are subject to currently exercisable options granted by the Company under the 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS943 | Additionally, we have developed and continue to support the base technology underlying Anthems core care guidance offering, which Anthem is rolling out to its book of business in a phased approach. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Additionally, we have developed and continue to support the base technology underlying Anthems core care guidance offering, which Anthem is rolling out to its book of business in a phased approach.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS944 | 5) On January19, 2007 Chittenden announced the acquisition of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc and its subsidiary Merrill Merchants Bank, for approximately $111.4 million in cash and stock. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
5) On January19, 2007 Chittenden announced the acquisition of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc and its subsidiary Merrill Merchants Bank, for approximately $111.4 million in cash and stock.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS945 | Competition and Customer Demand Rental and Management Segments Our rental and management segments compete with other international, national and regional tower companies, primarily Crown Castle International Corp. and SBA Communications Corporation in the United States and Indus Towers in India, as well as wireless carriers and broadcasters that own and operate their own communications site networks and lease space to third parties, numerous independent tower owners and the owners of non-communications sites, including rooftops, utility towers, water towers and other alternative structures. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition and Customer Demand Rental and Management Segments Our rental and management segments compete with other international, national and regional tower companies, primarily Crown Castle International Corp. and SBA Communications Corporation in the United States and Indus Towers in India, as well as wireless carriers and broadcasters that own and operate their own communications site networks and lease space to third parties, numerous independent tower owners and the owners of non-communications sites, including rooftops, utility towers, water towers and other alternative structures.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS946 | Mister Tolonen currently serves as a member of the board of directors of MobileIron, Inc, an enterprise mobile solutions company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Tolonen currently serves as a member of the board of directors of MobileIron, Inc, an enterprise mobile solutions company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS947 | He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Flexsteel Industries Inc, a furniture manufacturer. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Flexsteel Industries Inc, a furniture manufacturer.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS948 | Avis and Budget maintain marketing partnerships with several major airlines, including American Airlines, British Airways, Continental Airlines, Lufthansa, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Avis and Budget maintain marketing partnerships with several major airlines, including American Airlines, British Airways, Continental Airlines, Lufthansa, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS949 | Competition Our bone growth stimulation products compete principally with similar products marketed by Biomet Spine, a business unit of Biomet, Inc DJO Incrporated; and Exogen, Inc, a subsidiary of Smith& Nephew plc. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition Our bone growth stimulation products compete principally with similar products marketed by Biomet Spine, a business unit of Biomet, Inc DJO Incrporated; and Exogen, Inc, a subsidiary of Smith& Nephew plc.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS950 | The demand for our SBus products has continued to decline as Sun Microsystems has released new midrange and high-end server products that do not include the SBus interface. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The demand for our SBus products has continued to decline as Sun Microsystems has released new midrange and high-end server products that do not include the SBus interface.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS951 | Mister Lichter joins Akorn from Abbott Laboratories, where he served in various leadership roles over 32 years, most recently as Corporate Vice President, Operations, for Abbotts Established Pharmaceutical Division in Switzerland. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Lichter joins Akorn from Abbott Laboratories, where he served in various leadership roles over 32 years, most recently as Corporate Vice President, Operations, for Abbotts Established Pharmaceutical Division in Switzerland.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS952 | Additional potential competitors for ARX-02 include products in late stage development for cancer breakthrough pain, such as: Fentanyl TAIFUN, currently manufactured by Akela Pharma, Inc; and SL Spray, currently manufactured by Insys Therapeutics, Inc Potential Competition for ARX-03 We are developing ARX-03, the Sufentanil/Triazolam NanoTab, for use in diagnostic or therapeutic painful procedures of short duration in a physicians office. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Additional potential competitors for ARX-02 include products in late stage development for cancer breakthrough pain, such as: Fentanyl TAIFUN, currently manufactured by Akela Pharma, Inc; and SL Spray, currently manufactured by Insys Therapeutics, Inc Potential Competition for ARX-03 We are developing ARX-03, the Sufentanil/Triazolam NanoTab, for use in diagnostic or therapeutic painful procedures of short duration in a physicians office.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS953 | We have recognized revenues from our strategic alliances with Amgen, Astellas, and MyoKardia, Inc (MyoKardia) and grant revenues from The ALS Association (the ALSA) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes (NINDS). | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have recognized revenues from our strategic alliances with Amgen, Astellas, and MyoKardia, Inc (MyoKardia) and grant revenues from The ALS Association (the ALSA) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes (NINDS).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS954 | Mister Wright is a director of Terremark Worldwide,Inc and Federal Signal Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Wright is a director of Terremark Worldwide,Inc and Federal Signal Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS955 | Miss Burns joined Xerox in 1980, subsequently advancing through several engineering and management positions. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Miss Burns joined Xerox in 1980, subsequently advancing through several engineering and management positions.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS956 | On November23, 2010 (the Transaction Date), The Gymboree Corporation completed a merger (the Merger) with Giraffe Acquisition Corporation (Acquisition Sub) in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Giraffe Holding, Inc (Parent), and Acquisition Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, with the Merger funded through a combination of debt and equity financing (collectively, the Transactions). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November23, 2010 (the Transaction Date), The Gymboree Corporation completed a merger (the Merger) with Giraffe Acquisition Corporation (Acquisition Sub) in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Giraffe Holding, Inc (Parent), and Acquisition Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, with the Merger funded through a combination of debt and equity financing (collectively, the Transactions).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS957 | We are Oracle's premier partner in higher education, a lead partner in the public sector, and an emerging partner in health care. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We are Oracle's premier partner in higher education, a lead partner in the public sector, and an emerging partner in health care.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS958 | Miss Johnson holds a degree in accounting from the University of Buenos Aires and currently serves on the board of directors for Intersil Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Miss Johnson holds a degree in accounting from the University of Buenos Aires and currently serves on the board of directors for Intersil Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS959 | The following table sets forth the quarterly sales price ranges of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by Nasdaq. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The following table sets forth the quarterly sales price ranges of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by Nasdaq.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS960 | In total during 2012, we received $96 million from Biogen Idec and AstraZeneca in upfront payments and have the potential to earn more than $2 billion in future milestone payments and licensing fees. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In total during 2012, we received $96 million from Biogen Idec and AstraZeneca in upfront payments and have the potential to earn more than $2 billion in future milestone payments and licensing fees.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS961 | Radiant competitors include International Business Machines, Corp., NCR Corporation, Casio, Dell, VeriFone, Inc, Doctor sser, Inc, Retalix, Ltd., Pacer/CATS (owned by Clarity Commerce Solutions plc), Micros Systems, Inc, Par Technology Corporation, POSitouch, Panasonic, The Pinnacle Corporation, Agilysys, RetailPro and others that provide point-of-sale and site management systems with varying degrees of functionality. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Radiant competitors include International Business Machines, Corp., NCR Corporation, Casio, Dell, VeriFone, Inc, Doctor sser, Inc, Retalix, Ltd., Pacer/CATS (owned by Clarity Commerce Solutions plc), Micros Systems, Inc, Par Technology Corporation, POSitouch, Panasonic, The Pinnacle Corporation, Agilysys, RetailPro and others that provide point-of-sale and site management systems with varying degrees of functionality.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS962 | In 2011, the Company expanded into the Greater New Orleans area through its acquisition of GS Financial Corporation (GSFC) and its subsidiary, Guaranty Savings Bank (Guaranty). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2011, the Company expanded into the Greater New Orleans area through its acquisition of GS Financial Corporation (GSFC) and its subsidiary, Guaranty Savings Bank (Guaranty).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS963 | In addition, we have established partnerships with Microsoft Azure, VMware vCloud Air, Amazon Web Services and many others to provide cloud-based application services and solutions. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, we have established partnerships with Microsoft Azure, VMware vCloud Air, Amazon Web Services and many others to provide cloud-based application services and solutions.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS964 | For purposes of the following discussion, Bioverativ refers to the hemophilia business of Biogen prior to the separation. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For purposes of the following discussion, Bioverativ refers to the hemophilia business of Biogen prior to the separation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS965 | Specifically, newer categories of competitors include virtual multichannel video programming distributors such as AT&Ts DirecTV NOW, DISH Network Corporations Sling TV, and Sony Corporations Playstation Vue. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Specifically, newer categories of competitors include virtual multichannel video programming distributors such as AT&Ts DirecTV NOW, DISH Network Corporations Sling TV, and Sony Corporations Playstation Vue.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS966 | Mister Cashion currently serves as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conatus Pharmaceuticals Inc, a publically owned biotechnology company focused in the areas of inflammation and liver disease, which he co-founded with other senior management of Idun Pharmaceuticals, Inc following the sale of Idun to Pfizer, Inc in July 2005. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Cashion currently serves as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conatus Pharmaceuticals Inc, a publically owned biotechnology company focused in the areas of inflammation and liver disease, which he co-founded with other senior management of Idun Pharmaceuticals, Inc following the sale of Idun to Pfizer, Inc in July 2005.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS967 | The majority of the competition in the healthcare industry market for Image Management services comes primarily from the large photocopy/multi-functional digital device manufacturers such as Xerox, Canon, Konica Minolta, Ricoh and Sharp. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The majority of the competition in the healthcare industry market for Image Management services comes primarily from the large photocopy/multi-functional digital device manufacturers such as Xerox, Canon, Konica Minolta, Ricoh and Sharp.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS968 | Medford, NY Owned 280,000 Oceanside, NY Owned 220,000 South Hampton, NJ Owned 210,000 Ridgewood, NY Owned 203,158 Setauket, NY Owned 68,000 Maspeth, NY Leased 120,000 Los Angeles, CA Leased 159,587 Staten Island, NY Leased 144,292 St. Louis, MO Leased 244,000 Jamaica, NY Leased 225,000 Bronx, NY Leased 223,000 Brooklyn, NY Leased 186,840 Bronx, NY Leased 147,000 Bronx, NY Leased 208,00 | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Medford, NY Owned 280,000 Oceanside, NY Owned 220,000 South Hampton, NJ Owned 210,000 Ridgewood, NY Owned 203,158 Setauket, NY Owned 68,000 Maspeth, NY Leased 120,000 Los Angeles, CA Leased 159,587 Staten Island, NY Leased 144,292 St. Louis, MO Leased 244,000 Jamaica, NY Leased 225,000 Bronx, NY Leased 223,000 Brooklyn, NY Leased 186,840 Bronx, NY Leased 147,000 Bronx, NY Leased 208,00
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS969 | On December11, 2007, CDI completed its acquisition of Horizon, through the merger of Horizon with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI, which resulted in Horizon becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On December11, 2007, CDI completed its acquisition of Horizon, through the merger of Horizon with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI, which resulted in Horizon becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS970 | In addition, large operating system and application vendors, such as Microsoft Corporation, as well as some hardware manufacturers, have introduced products or functionality that includes some of the same functions offered by our software applications. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, large operating system and application vendors, such as Microsoft Corporation, as well as some hardware manufacturers, have introduced products or functionality that includes some of the same functions offered by our software applications.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS971 | Among the industry-specific donor management solutions, our primary competitors are Blackbaud,Inc, The Sage Groupplc, and SofterWare,Inc Among the commercial database and constituent relationship management providers, our primary competitors are Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation and Salesforce.com,Inc NPOs using such commercial database and constituent relationship management providers also often seek to adapt such offerings themselves or through third party system integrators to create additional custom competitive solutions. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Among the industry-specific donor management solutions, our primary competitors are Blackbaud,Inc, The Sage Groupplc, and SofterWare,Inc Among the commercial database and constituent relationship management providers, our primary competitors are Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation and Salesforce.com,Inc NPOs using such commercial database and constituent relationship management providers also often seek to adapt such offerings themselves or through third party system integrators to create additional custom competitive solutions.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS972 | These software vendors include, Authoria, Inc, Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc, Halogen Software Inc, Kenexa Corporation, Oracle Corporation, Plateau Systems, Ltd., Salary.com, Inc, SAP AG, Softscape, Inc, StepStone Solutions, SumTotal Systems Inc, Taleo Corporation, and Workday, Inc We expect that the competitive landscape will change as the market for performance and talent management software and services consolidates and matures. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These software vendors include, Authoria, Inc, Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc, Halogen Software Inc, Kenexa Corporation, Oracle Corporation, Plateau Systems, Ltd., Salary.com, Inc, SAP AG, Softscape, Inc, StepStone Solutions, SumTotal Systems Inc, Taleo Corporation, and Workday, Inc We expect that the competitive landscape will change as the market for performance and talent management software and services consolidates and matures.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS973 | 60% Cardiac Surgery Fedorow C, Grocott HP. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
60% Cardiac Surgery Fedorow C, Grocott HP.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS974 | Andrew H. TischMister Tisch has been Co-Chairman of the Board of Loews Corporation since January 2006 and is the Chairman of the Executive Committee and a member of the Office of the President of Loews Corporation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Andrew H. TischMister Tisch has been Co-Chairman of the Board of Loews Corporation since January 2006 and is the Chairman of the Executive Committee and a member of the Office of the President of Loews Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS975 | Mister Howe was employed from 1999 - 2007 as an executive and later as a corporate officer at aQuantive, Inc where he managed three lines of business, including Avenue A|Razorfish (a leading Seattle-based global consultancy in digital marketing and technology), DRIVE Performance Media (now Microsoft Media Network), and Atlas International (one of the top two applications for enterprise software for advertising).Earlier in his career, he was with The Boston Consulting Group and Kidder, 12 Peabody & Company, IncHe serves as a director of Blue Nile, Inc (NASDAQ:NILE), a leading online retailer of diamonds and fine jewelry, and of the Center for Medical Weight Loss. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Howe was employed from 1999 - 2007 as an executive and later as a corporate officer at aQuantive, Inc where he managed three lines of business, including Avenue A|Razorfish (a leading Seattle-based global consultancy in digital marketing and technology), DRIVE Performance Media (now Microsoft Media Network), and Atlas International (one of the top two applications for enterprise software for advertising).Earlier in his career, he was with The Boston Consulting Group and Kidder, 12 Peabody & Company, IncHe serves as a director of Blue Nile, Inc (NASDAQ:NILE), a leading online retailer of diamonds and fine jewelry, and of the Center for Medical Weight Loss.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS976 | Our principal competitors include, or could include: video rental outlets, such as Blockbuster and Movie Gallery; online DVD subscription rental sites, such as Blockbuster Online; pay-per-view and VOD services and alternative content delivery methods such as Apples video iPod and MovieBeam; movie retail stores, such as Best Buy, Wal-Mart and Amazon.com; subscription entertainment services, such as HBO and Showtime; Internet movie providers, such as Movielink, CinemaNow.com and Vongo; Internet companies such as Yahoo and Google; cable providers, such as AOL Time Warner and Comcast; and direct broadcast satellite providers, such as DIRECTV and Echostar. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our principal competitors include, or could include: video rental outlets, such as Blockbuster and Movie Gallery; online DVD subscription rental sites, such as Blockbuster Online; pay-per-view and VOD services and alternative content delivery methods such as Apples video iPod and MovieBeam; movie retail stores, such as Best Buy, Wal-Mart and Amazon.com; subscription entertainment services, such as HBO and Showtime; Internet movie providers, such as Movielink, CinemaNow.com and Vongo; Internet companies such as Yahoo and Google; cable providers, such as AOL Time Warner and Comcast; and direct broadcast satellite providers, such as DIRECTV and Echostar.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS977 | Currently, our partners include Accenture Ltd., Capgemini SA, Computer Sciences Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions Inc, International Business Machines Corporation, Satyam Computer Services Ltd., Steria Group, and Virtusa Corporation. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Currently, our partners include Accenture Ltd., Capgemini SA, Computer Sciences Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions Inc, International Business Machines Corporation, Satyam Computer Services Ltd., Steria Group, and Virtusa Corporation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS978 | On April 30, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc, or Entropic, and promptly following such acquisition, Entropic merged with and into Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC, with Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC continuing as the surviving entity and changing its name to Entropic Communications, LLC. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On April 30, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Entropic Communications, Inc, or Entropic, and promptly following such acquisition, Entropic merged with and into Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC, with Excalibur Subsidiary, LLC continuing as the surviving entity and changing its name to Entropic Communications, LLC.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS979 | We have entered into a collaborative agreement with Biogen to provide funding and assistance in the development of certain ZFP Therapeutics through the clinical trial process. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have entered into a collaborative agreement with Biogen to provide funding and assistance in the development of certain ZFP Therapeutics through the clinical trial process.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS980 | In October 1995, JP acquired Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Company of America (AH Life) and its subsidiary, First Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Company (FAHL), from a subsidiary of Household International, Inc With the acquisition, certain blocks of the acquired business were 100% coinsured with affiliates of Household. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In October 1995, JP acquired Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Company of America (AH Life) and its subsidiary, First Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Company (FAHL), from a subsidiary of Household International, Inc With the acquisition, certain blocks of the acquired business were 100% coinsured with affiliates of Household.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS981 | Previously, Mister Cunningham was with Pfizer, Inc, where he served in a series of sales and leadership and general management roles for 21 years. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Previously, Mister Cunningham was with Pfizer, Inc, where he served in a series of sales and leadership and general management roles for 21 years.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS982 | Competitors include: Datalogic, Honeywell, and Panasonic. Data Capture and RFID: Competitors that provide a broad portfolio of barcode scanning products that are suitable for most global market applications include Datalogic and Honeywell. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competitors include: Datalogic, Honeywell, and Panasonic. Data Capture and RFID: Competitors that provide a broad portfolio of barcode scanning products that are suitable for most global market applications include Datalogic and Honeywell.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS983 | In addition, Mister Brubaker, our vice chairman, chief operating officer, assistant secretary and a director, is the vice chairman, chief operating officer, assistant secretary and a director of the Adviser, Gladstone Capital, Gladstone Commercial and Gladstone Land. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, Mister Brubaker, our vice chairman, chief operating officer, assistant secretary and a director, is the vice chairman, chief operating officer, assistant secretary and a director of the Adviser, Gladstone Capital, Gladstone Commercial and Gladstone Land.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS984 | Our competitors include Finisar and Hitachi Yagi at the subsystem level and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc and Eudyna Device, Inc at the component product level. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our competitors include Finisar and Hitachi Yagi at the subsystem level and Applied Optoelectronics, Inc and Eudyna Device, Inc at the component product level.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS985 | In 2013, we formed Phillips 66 Partners, a master limited partnership, to own, operate, develop and acquire primarily fee-based crude oil, refined petroleum product and NGL pipelines and terminals, as well as other transportation and midstream assets. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2013, we formed Phillips 66 Partners, a master limited partnership, to own, operate, develop and acquire primarily fee-based crude oil, refined petroleum product and NGL pipelines and terminals, as well as other transportation and midstream assets.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS986 | When Levulan is used and followed with exposure to light to treat a medical condition, it is known as Levulan photodynamic therapy, or PDT. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
When Levulan is used and followed with exposure to light to treat a medical condition, it is known as Levulan photodynamic therapy, or PDT.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS987 | ICO New Zealand Restructuring Plan In March 2010, ICO management decided to close its operations at its plant in New Zealand. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
ICO New Zealand Restructuring Plan In March 2010, ICO management decided to close its operations at its plant in New Zealand.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS988 | We offer our products and services primarily through direct customer contact through our call centers, search engine marketing, affinity marketing partners, resellers and marketing alliances such as our relationships with Time Warner Cable and Dish Network. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We offer our products and services primarily through direct customer contact through our call centers, search engine marketing, affinity marketing partners, resellers and marketing alliances such as our relationships with Time Warner Cable and Dish Network.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS989 | These estimated costs primarily relate to site closure criteria by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for potential impacts to soil and groundwater from herbicide applications at Gulf Power substations. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
These estimated costs primarily relate to site closure criteria by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for potential impacts to soil and groundwater from herbicide applications at Gulf Power substations.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS990 | Avis maintains marketing relationships with other organizations such as American Express, MasterCard International and other organizations, through which we are able to provide their customers with incentives to rent from Avis. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Avis maintains marketing relationships with other organizations such as American Express, MasterCard International and other organizations, through which we are able to provide their customers with incentives to rent from Avis.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS991 | 5) Represents shares of Resource America stock based on the closing price of $14.67, Resource Americas stock price on December 31, 2007. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
5) Represents shares of Resource America stock based on the closing price of $14.67, Resource Americas stock price on December 31, 2007.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS992 | There are several classes of antibiotics that are primary competitors for the treatment of these indications, including: other fluoroquinolones such as Levaquin (levofloxacin), a product of Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc, Tequin (gatifloxacin), a product of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Cipro (ciprofloxacin) and Avelox (moxifloxacin), both products of Bayer Corporation; ketolides, such as Ketek (telithromycin), a product of Sanofi-Aventis, macrolides such as Biaxin (clarithromycin), a product of Abbott Laboratories and Zithromax (azithromycin), a product of Pfizer Inc; and penicillins such as Augmentin (amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium), a product of GlaxoSmithKline. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
There are several classes of antibiotics that are primary competitors for the treatment of these indications, including: other fluoroquinolones such as Levaquin (levofloxacin), a product of Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc, Tequin (gatifloxacin), a product of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Cipro (ciprofloxacin) and Avelox (moxifloxacin), both products of Bayer Corporation; ketolides, such as Ketek (telithromycin), a product of Sanofi-Aventis, macrolides such as Biaxin (clarithromycin), a product of Abbott Laboratories and Zithromax (azithromycin), a product of Pfizer Inc; and penicillins such as Augmentin (amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium), a product of GlaxoSmithKline.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS993 | In February 2002, the Companys subsidiary, Seeger-Orbis GmbH& Co. OHG, now known as TransTechnology Germany GmbH (the Selling Company) sold its retaining ring business in Germany to Barnes Group Inc (Barnes). | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In February 2002, the Companys subsidiary, Seeger-Orbis GmbH& Co. OHG, now known as TransTechnology Germany GmbH (the Selling Company) sold its retaining ring business in Germany to Barnes Group Inc (Barnes).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS994 | b) For 2017, net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, includes a loss on the split-off of CBS Radio of $105 million, or $.26 per diluted share, and a market value adjustment of $980 million, or $2.41 per diluted share, recorded prior to the split-off to reduce the carrying value of CBS Radio to the value indicated by the stock valuation of Entercom Communications Corp. (Entercom). | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
b) For 2017, net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, includes a loss on the split-off of CBS Radio of $105 million, or $.26 per diluted share, and a market value adjustment of $980 million, or $2.41 per diluted share, recorded prior to the split-off to reduce the carrying value of CBS Radio to the value indicated by the stock valuation of Entercom Communications Corp. (Entercom).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS995 | In late 2001 we acquired (either by asset acquisition or subsidiary merger) two additional storage solution providers, ECOSoftware Systems, Inc and ITIS Services, Inc (ITIS). | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In late 2001 we acquired (either by asset acquisition or subsidiary merger) two additional storage solution providers, ECOSoftware Systems, Inc and ITIS Services, Inc (ITIS).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS996 | We have established relationships with key distributors, value-added resellers and systems integrators such as Avant Telecoms Inc, Communications Services International, Inc, Hutton Communication, Inc, Somera Communications Inc, Tessco Technologies Incrporated and Westcon Inc to market and sell our systems. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We have established relationships with key distributors, value-added resellers and systems integrators such as Avant Telecoms Inc, Communications Services International, Inc, Hutton Communication, Inc, Somera Communications Inc, Tessco Technologies Incrporated and Westcon Inc to market and sell our systems.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS997 | She also serves on the boards of a number of other scientific, technological and civic organizations, and is a member of the boards of directors of Red Hat Corp., W.R. Grace Co. and the Camille and Henry Doctor yfus Foundation. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
She also serves on the boards of a number of other scientific, technological and civic organizations, and is a member of the boards of directors of Red Hat Corp., W.R. Grace Co. and the Camille and Henry Doctor yfus Foundation.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS998 | Some of these competitors include: Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, Linear Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Advanced Analogic Technologies, and Monolithic Power Systems, with respect to our power management products; ST Microelectronics N.V., NXP, ON Semiconductor, Protek and California Micro Devices, with respect to our protection products; Analog Devices and Maxim Integrated Products, with respect to our advanced communications and sensing products. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Some of these competitors include: Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, Linear Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Advanced Analogic Technologies, and Monolithic Power Systems, with respect to our power management products; ST Microelectronics N.V., NXP, ON Semiconductor, Protek and California Micro Devices, with respect to our protection products; Analog Devices and Maxim Integrated Products, with respect to our advanced communications and sensing products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS999 | In addition, Guardant Health, Inc, Personal Genome Diagnostics, Inc, Foundation Medicine, Inc and Genomic Health Inc have each developed and are offering liquid biopsy tests commercially in the United States, and Genomic Health Inc has announced plans to commercialize Epic Sciences liquid biopsy test in the United States. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, Guardant Health, Inc, Personal Genome Diagnostics, Inc, Foundation Medicine, Inc and Genomic Health Inc have each developed and are offering liquid biopsy tests commercially in the United States, and Genomic Health Inc has announced plans to commercialize Epic Sciences liquid biopsy test in the United States.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.