id stringlengths 6 9 | text stringlengths 14 8.58k | answer stringclasses 5 values | query stringlengths 856 9.42k | choices sequence | gold int64 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRCS0 | Our primary competitors with respect to our advanced communications and sensing products are Silicon Laboratories, Integrated Device Technology Inc, Zarlink Semiconductor Inc, and Micrel Inc, Broadcom Corporation, Inphi Corporation and internal solutions; Our primary competitors with respect to our microwave and high-reliability products include Microsemi Corporation, Hittite Microwave Corporation and L3 Communications Holdings Inc, and gallium arsenide product manufacturers. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our primary competitors with respect to our advanced communications and sensing products are Silicon Laboratories, Integrated Device Technology Inc, Zarlink Semiconductor Inc, and Micrel Inc, Broadcom Corporation, Inphi Corporation and internal solutions; Our primary competitors with respect to our microwave and high-reliability products include Microsemi Corporation, Hittite Microwave Corporation and L3 Communications Holdings Inc, and gallium arsenide product manufacturers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS1 | Novozymes A/S and Genencor International Inc are involved in development, overexpression, fermentation, and purification of enzymes. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Novozymes A/S and Genencor International Inc are involved in development, overexpression, fermentation, and purification of enzymes.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS2 | 4) This market includes the San Jose, CA market which independently has a MSA rank of 34. ( | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
4) This market includes the San Jose, CA market which independently has a MSA rank of 34. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS3 | -33- Average Balance Analysis of Net Interest Earnings 2008 2007 2006 Average Interest Average Average Interest Average Average Interest Average Balance Incme/(Expense) Yield/(Cost) Balance Incme/(Expense) Yield/(Cost) Balance Incme/(Expense) Yield/(Cost) (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) Interest Earning Assets Federal funds sold and interest- bearing deposits in banks $ 554 $ 20 3.61 % $ 981 $ 51 5.20 % $ 960 $ 44 4.58 % Securities available for sale: Taxable (1) 57,260 2,682 4.68 % 41,112 1,837 4.47 % 38,855 1,546 3.98 % Tax-exempt 5,300 196 3.70 % 5,226 156 2.99 % 3,302 125 3.79 % Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(2)(3)(4) 882,742 63,047 7.14 % 785,132 67,122 8.55 % 712,563 60,257 8.46 % Total interest earning assets 945,856 65,945 6.97 % 832,451 69,166 8.31 % 755,680 61,972 8.20 % Non Earning Assets Cash and due from banks 18,241 21,662 23,272 Premises and equipment 20,955 19,755 17,694 Goodwill & other intangibles 23,018 23,376 24,057 Interest receivable and other 10,970 6,688 4,968 Total non interest earning assets 73,184 71,481 69,991 Total assets $ 1,019,040 $ 903,932 $ 825,671 Interest-Bearing Liabilities Money market and NOW accounts $ 379,657 $ (6,584 ) -1.73 % $ 364,780 $ (13,358 ) -3.66 % $ 307,054 $ (10,551 ) -3.44 % Savings deposits 21,228 (183 ) -0.86 % 24,309 (486 ) -2.00 % 23,559 (360 ) -1.53 % Time deposits - core 42,566 (1,427 ) -3.35 % 32,589 (1,381 ) -4.24 % 40,989 (1,466 ) -3.58 % Total interest-bearing core deposits 443,451 (8,194 ) -1.85 % 421,678 (15,225 ) -3.61 % 371,602 (12,377 ) -3.33 % Time deposits - non-core 56,380 (1,948 ) -3.46 % 63,918 (3,347 ) -5.24 % 71,954 (3,504 ) -4.87 % Federal funds purchased 22,094 (578 ) -2.62 % 10,128 (539 ) -5.32 % 7,580 (380 ) -5.01 % FHLB & FRB borrowings 202,293 (5,456 ) -2.70 % 123,597 (6,121 ) -4.95 % 108,324 (5,144 ) -4.75 % Trust preferred 8,248 (498 ) -6.04 % 8,248 (508 ) -6.16 % 8,248 (510 ) -6.18 % Total interest-bearing alternative funding 289,015 (8,480 ) -2.93 % 205,891 (10,515 ) -5.11 % 196,106 (9,538 ) -4.86 % Total interest-bearing liabilities 732,466 (16,674 ) -2.28 % 627,569 (25,740 ) -4.10 % 567,708 (21,915 ) -3.86 % Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities Demand deposits 169,792 169,035 162,259 Interest payable and other 4,914 4,239 5,466 Total noninterest-bearing liabilities 174,706 173,274 167,725 Total liabilities 907,172 800,843 735,433 Stockholders' equity 111,868 103,089 90,238 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,019,040 $ 903,932 $ 825,671 Net Interest Incme $ 49,271 $ 43,426 $ 40,057 Net Interest Incme as a Percent of Earning Assets 5.21 % 5.22 % 5.30 % (1) Federal Home Loan Bank stock is included in securities available for sale. ( | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
-33- Average Balance Analysis of Net Interest Earnings 2008 2007 2006 Average Interest Average Average Interest Average Average Interest Average Balance Incme/(Expense) Yield/(Cost) Balance Incme/(Expense) Yield/(Cost) Balance Incme/(Expense) Yield/(Cost) (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) Interest Earning Assets Federal funds sold and interest- bearing deposits in banks $ 554 $ 20 3.61 % $ 981 $ 51 5.20 % $ 960 $ 44 4.58 % Securities available for sale: Taxable (1) 57,260 2,682 4.68 % 41,112 1,837 4.47 % 38,855 1,546 3.98 % Tax-exempt 5,300 196 3.70 % 5,226 156 2.99 % 3,302 125 3.79 % Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(2)(3)(4) 882,742 63,047 7.14 % 785,132 67,122 8.55 % 712,563 60,257 8.46 % Total interest earning assets 945,856 65,945 6.97 % 832,451 69,166 8.31 % 755,680 61,972 8.20 % Non Earning Assets Cash and due from banks 18,241 21,662 23,272 Premises and equipment 20,955 19,755 17,694 Goodwill & other intangibles 23,018 23,376 24,057 Interest receivable and other 10,970 6,688 4,968 Total non interest earning assets 73,184 71,481 69,991 Total assets $ 1,019,040 $ 903,932 $ 825,671 Interest-Bearing Liabilities Money market and NOW accounts $ 379,657 $ (6,584 ) -1.73 % $ 364,780 $ (13,358 ) -3.66 % $ 307,054 $ (10,551 ) -3.44 % Savings deposits 21,228 (183 ) -0.86 % 24,309 (486 ) -2.00 % 23,559 (360 ) -1.53 % Time deposits - core 42,566 (1,427 ) -3.35 % 32,589 (1,381 ) -4.24 % 40,989 (1,466 ) -3.58 % Total interest-bearing core deposits 443,451 (8,194 ) -1.85 % 421,678 (15,225 ) -3.61 % 371,602 (12,377 ) -3.33 % Time deposits - non-core 56,380 (1,948 ) -3.46 % 63,918 (3,347 ) -5.24 % 71,954 (3,504 ) -4.87 % Federal funds purchased 22,094 (578 ) -2.62 % 10,128 (539 ) -5.32 % 7,580 (380 ) -5.01 % FHLB & FRB borrowings 202,293 (5,456 ) -2.70 % 123,597 (6,121 ) -4.95 % 108,324 (5,144 ) -4.75 % Trust preferred 8,248 (498 ) -6.04 % 8,248 (508 ) -6.16 % 8,248 (510 ) -6.18 % Total interest-bearing alternative funding 289,015 (8,480 ) -2.93 % 205,891 (10,515 ) -5.11 % 196,106 (9,538 ) -4.86 % Total interest-bearing liabilities 732,466 (16,674 ) -2.28 % 627,569 (25,740 ) -4.10 % 567,708 (21,915 ) -3.86 % Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities Demand deposits 169,792 169,035 162,259 Interest payable and other 4,914 4,239 5,466 Total noninterest-bearing liabilities 174,706 173,274 167,725 Total liabilities 907,172 800,843 735,433 Stockholders' equity 111,868 103,089 90,238 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,019,040 $ 903,932 $ 825,671 Net Interest Incme $ 49,271 $ 43,426 $ 40,057 Net Interest Incme as a Percent of Earning Assets 5.21 % 5.22 % 5.30 % (1) Federal Home Loan Bank stock is included in securities available for sale. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS4 | On November12, 2004, we sold approximately 924,000 shares of TriMas stock to Masco Corporation for $23 per share, or a total of $21.3 million. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November12, 2004, we sold approximately 924,000 shares of TriMas stock to Masco Corporation for $23 per share, or a total of $21.3 million.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS5 | Mister Schlosberg serves on the board of directors of Edison International, and is also a national board member of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Air and Space museum, a member of the USO World Board of Govenors, and a trustee of Pomona College. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Schlosberg serves on the board of directors of Edison International, and is also a national board member of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Air and Space museum, a member of the USO World Board of Govenors, and a trustee of Pomona College.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS6 | Competition We compete with several large domestic and foreign companies, such as Mattel, Inc and Hasbro, Inc, with private label products sold by many of our retail customers, and with other producers of toys, collectibles, and infant and toddler products. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition We compete with several large domestic and foreign companies, such as Mattel, Inc and Hasbro, Inc, with private label products sold by many of our retail customers, and with other producers of toys, collectibles, and infant and toddler products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS7 | The Company has entered into partnership alliances with several software firms and IT application infrastructure firms, including Ab Initio, Actuate, BEA Systems, Business Objects, Cognos, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Informatica, Microstrategy, Oracle, SAP, Serden Technologies, TIBCO, Mercury, among others. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Company has entered into partnership alliances with several software firms and IT application infrastructure firms, including Ab Initio, Actuate, BEA Systems, Business Objects, Cognos, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Informatica, Microstrategy, Oracle, SAP, Serden Technologies, TIBCO, Mercury, among others.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS8 | The SI program includes organizations such as Accenture, Atos Origin, Computer Sciences Corporation, Dimension Data, Hewlett Packard, Fujitsu, IBM Global Services, Wipro and TATA Consultancy Services Limited, among others. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The SI program includes organizations such as Accenture, Atos Origin, Computer Sciences Corporation, Dimension Data, Hewlett Packard, Fujitsu, IBM Global Services, Wipro and TATA Consultancy Services Limited, among others.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS9 | We believe we will achieve further gains in revenues and operating margins in both existing and newly acquired stores by continuingto: use focused advertising and our new business relationships, such as our strategic alliances with McDonalds and Jackson-Hewitt, to increase store traffic. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We believe we will achieve further gains in revenues and operating margins in both existing and newly acquired stores by continuingto: use focused advertising and our new business relationships, such as our strategic alliances with McDonalds and Jackson-Hewitt, to increase store traffic.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS10 | Deferred Debt Extinguishment Costs: Represents deferred costs of debt extinguishment of Pepco, DPL and ACE that are amortized to interest expense and recovered from customers. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Deferred Debt Extinguishment Costs: Represents deferred costs of debt extinguishment of Pepco, DPL and ACE that are amortized to interest expense and recovered from customers.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS11 | Some of these competitors include Cephalon, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceuticals and Forest Laboratories. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Some of these competitors include Cephalon, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceuticals and Forest Laboratories.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS12 | The following table summarizes the current pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations of our officers and directors: Name of Individual Name of Affiliated Company Entitys Business Affiliation Gordon Pratt 1347 Capital LLC Private investment firm Director 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc Property and casualty insurance holding company Director Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc Financial services holding company Director Fund Management Group LLC Private holding company Managing Member Larry Swets 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc Property and casualty insurance holding company Director Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc Financial services holding company Director Kingsway Financial Services Inc, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Property and casualty insurance holding company Various LGIC Holdings LLC Private holding company Manager; Director Hassan Baqar 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Property and casualty insurance holding company Various Kingsway Financial Services Inc and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Property and casualty insurance holding company Various John T. Fitzgerald Argo Management Partners, LLC Private equity investment firm Managing Partner Hunter MFG, LLP Manufacturer and distributor of sports-licensed consumer products Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc Financial services holding company Director Oak Patch Gifts, LLC Private gift and jewelry manufacturer Chairman Progressive Bronze Products, LLC Private manufacturer of metal goods Director Joshua Horowitz Palm Ventures LLC Private investment firm/family office Managing Director Lincoln General Insurance Company Private insurance company Director Leo Christopher Saenger III Reliant Star Capital, Inc Private investment firm President 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc Property and casualty insurance holding company Director Aphena Pharma Holdings Private pharmaceutical packaging company Director Thomas D. Sargent Bradley, Foster & Sargent LLC Private asset management firm Various In order to minimize potential conflicts, or the appearance of conflicts, which may arise from the affiliations which certain of our officers and directors have with Kingsway and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Kingsway, on behalf of itself and any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries that may consider acquisition opportunities in the insurance sector, has granted us a right of first refusal with respect to any opportunity to acquire 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of any company or business in the insurance sector whose fair market value is at least equal to 80% of the balance of the trust account (less the deferred underwriters fees and taxes payable) at such time, which is the minimum size of a target business for our initial business combination. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The following table summarizes the current pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations of our officers and directors: Name of Individual Name of Affiliated Company Entitys Business Affiliation Gordon Pratt 1347 Capital LLC Private investment firm Director 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc Property and casualty insurance holding company Director Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc Financial services holding company Director Fund Management Group LLC Private holding company Managing Member Larry Swets 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc Property and casualty insurance holding company Director Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc Financial services holding company Director Kingsway Financial Services Inc, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Property and casualty insurance holding company Various LGIC Holdings LLC Private holding company Manager; Director Hassan Baqar 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Property and casualty insurance holding company Various Kingsway Financial Services Inc and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Property and casualty insurance holding company Various John T. Fitzgerald Argo Management Partners, LLC Private equity investment firm Managing Partner Hunter MFG, LLP Manufacturer and distributor of sports-licensed consumer products Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc Financial services holding company Director Oak Patch Gifts, LLC Private gift and jewelry manufacturer Chairman Progressive Bronze Products, LLC Private manufacturer of metal goods Director Joshua Horowitz Palm Ventures LLC Private investment firm/family office Managing Director Lincoln General Insurance Company Private insurance company Director Leo Christopher Saenger III Reliant Star Capital, Inc Private investment firm President 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc Property and casualty insurance holding company Director Aphena Pharma Holdings Private pharmaceutical packaging company Director Thomas D. Sargent Bradley, Foster & Sargent LLC Private asset management firm Various In order to minimize potential conflicts, or the appearance of conflicts, which may arise from the affiliations which certain of our officers and directors have with Kingsway and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Kingsway, on behalf of itself and any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries that may consider acquisition opportunities in the insurance sector, has granted us a right of first refusal with respect to any opportunity to acquire 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of any company or business in the insurance sector whose fair market value is at least equal to 80% of the balance of the trust account (less the deferred underwriters fees and taxes payable) at such time, which is the minimum size of a target business for our initial business combination.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS13 | As a result of this transaction, our licensing agreement with Celgene for tislelizumab may be terminated. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As a result of this transaction, our licensing agreement with Celgene for tislelizumab may be terminated.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS14 | Of the 1.6 billion web pages indicated as available by the Google search engine, searching for sex results in 15.9 million pages and porn results in 3.3 million. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Of the 1.6 billion web pages indicated as available by the Google search engine, searching for sex results in 15.9 million pages and porn results in 3.3 million.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS15 | Our current partnership with AbbVie is focused on the discovery and development of Synthetic Biotic-based therapies for the treatment of IBD, and in November 2018 we announced receipt of a second milestone payment for this program. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our current partnership with AbbVie is focused on the discovery and development of Synthetic Biotic-based therapies for the treatment of IBD, and in November 2018 we announced receipt of a second milestone payment for this program.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS16 | Pension and other postretirement benefit net cost and plan contribution information for Questar Gas and Questar Pipeline are shown below: Pension Other Postretirement Benefits Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 (in millions) Questar Gas Net periodic cost $ 18.1 $ 19.7 $ 13.4 $ 2.4 $ 3.3 $ 2.3 Share of total plan contributions 29.6 39.4 27.1 2.0 1.9 2.2 Questar Pipeline Net periodic cost $ 6.7 $ 7.4 $ 5.0 $ 0.2 $ 1.2 $ 1.0 Share of total plan contributions 11.2 15.1 8.7 0.7 0.6 0.2 Employee Investment Plan The Employee Investment Plan (EIP) is a defined contribution pension plan that allows eligible employees to purchase shares of Questar common stock or other investments through payroll deduction at the fair market value on the transaction date. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Pension and other postretirement benefit net cost and plan contribution information for Questar Gas and Questar Pipeline are shown below: Pension Other Postretirement Benefits Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 (in millions) Questar Gas Net periodic cost $ 18.1 $ 19.7 $ 13.4 $ 2.4 $ 3.3 $ 2.3 Share of total plan contributions 29.6 39.4 27.1 2.0 1.9 2.2 Questar Pipeline Net periodic cost $ 6.7 $ 7.4 $ 5.0 $ 0.2 $ 1.2 $ 1.0 Share of total plan contributions 11.2 15.1 8.7 0.7 0.6 0.2 Employee Investment Plan The Employee Investment Plan (EIP) is a defined contribution pension plan that allows eligible employees to purchase shares of Questar common stock or other investments through payroll deduction at the fair market value on the transaction date.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS17 | Coastal zones contain sedimentary limestones, clay, laterites, heavy mineral sands and silica sands. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Coastal zones contain sedimentary limestones, clay, laterites, heavy mineral sands and silica sands.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS18 | In recent years, we have developed partnerships with Cisco, HP, Microsoft, and VMware to provide integrated application services for their offerings. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In recent years, we have developed partnerships with Cisco, HP, Microsoft, and VMware to provide integrated application services for their offerings.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS19 | In addition, the Digital Workshop in collaboration with Microsoft offers complimentary photo and video editing classes, and guests will find specialty coffees, an extensive library, music listening stations and internet access in the Explorations Caf in partnership with The New York Times. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, the Digital Workshop in collaboration with Microsoft offers complimentary photo and video editing classes, and guests will find specialty coffees, an extensive library, music listening stations and internet access in the Explorations Caf in partnership with The New York Times.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS20 | Although the market is highly fragmented, especially for conforming mortgage products, chattel financing is consolidating among a few remaining national lenders: 21st Mortgage Corporation, an affiliate of Clayton Homes, Inc and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc; and US Bank Manufactured Housing Finance. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Although the market is highly fragmented, especially for conforming mortgage products, chattel financing is consolidating among a few remaining national lenders: 21st Mortgage Corporation, an affiliate of Clayton Homes, Inc and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc; and US Bank Manufactured Housing Finance.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS21 | In August2000, he retired as Executive Vice President, Global Services and Systems at Level 3 Communications. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In August2000, he retired as Executive Vice President, Global Services and Systems at Level 3 Communications.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS22 | Sales are made either directly to the U.S. Department of Defense or through prime contractors, Alliant Techsystems and General Dynamics. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Sales are made either directly to the U.S. Department of Defense or through prime contractors, Alliant Techsystems and General Dynamics.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS23 | Our primary sources of competition are vendors of software that address code-based development, such as Rational Software, MERANT, Perforce, Mortice Kern Systems, Inc, Telelogic Corp. and Microsoft. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our primary sources of competition are vendors of software that address code-based development, such as Rational Software, MERANT, Perforce, Mortice Kern Systems, Inc, Telelogic Corp. and Microsoft.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS24 | On October 31, 2013 (the Acquisition Date), we completed the acquisition of Enterasys Networks, Inc (Enterasys), a privately held provider of wired and wireless network infrastructure and security solutions, for $180.0 million, net of cash acquired, whereby Enterasys became our wholly-owned subsidiary. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On October 31, 2013 (the Acquisition Date), we completed the acquisition of Enterasys Networks, Inc (Enterasys), a privately held provider of wired and wireless network infrastructure and security solutions, for $180.0 million, net of cash acquired, whereby Enterasys became our wholly-owned subsidiary.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS25 | Jack Dorsey, our co-founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer, also serves as Chief Executive Officer of Twitter, Inc This may at times adversely affect his ability to devote time, attention, and effort to Square. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Jack Dorsey, our co-founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer, also serves as Chief Executive Officer of Twitter, Inc This may at times adversely affect his ability to devote time, attention, and effort to Square.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS26 | The Company views the following as its principal competition in its content and entertainment segment: National CineMedia, LLC (NCM), the largest in-theatre advertising business whose 3 largest customers are Regal Entertainment Group, AMC Entertainment, Inc and Cinemark Holdings, Inc operates the largest theatrical alternative content and non-feature film content distribution in its Fathom Network; Sony Pictures Classics, an autonomous division of Sony Pictures Entertainment; Fox Searchlight Pictures; Focus Features, a division of NBCUniversal; IFC Entertainment; Magnolia Pictures; and The Weinstein Company. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Company views the following as its principal competition in its content and entertainment segment: National CineMedia, LLC (NCM), the largest in-theatre advertising business whose 3 largest customers are Regal Entertainment Group, AMC Entertainment, Inc and Cinemark Holdings, Inc operates the largest theatrical alternative content and non-feature film content distribution in its Fathom Network; Sony Pictures Classics, an autonomous division of Sony Pictures Entertainment; Fox Searchlight Pictures; Focus Features, a division of NBCUniversal; IFC Entertainment; Magnolia Pictures; and The Weinstein Company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS27 | Avis also maintains marketing relationships with other organizations such as American Express, MasterCard International and others, through which we are able to provide their customers with incentives to rent from Avis. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Avis also maintains marketing relationships with other organizations such as American Express, MasterCard International and others, through which we are able to provide their customers with incentives to rent from Avis.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS28 | Mister Bronson serves on the Board of Directors of two publicly traded companies, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc Mister Bronson is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.S. in accounting from Fairfield University and a M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Bronson serves on the Board of Directors of two publicly traded companies, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc Mister Bronson is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.S. in accounting from Fairfield University and a M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS29 | Miss Stevens has been a member of the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin since 2002. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Miss Stevens has been a member of the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin since 2002.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS30 | Mister Rethore is a director of Belden, Inc, a manufacturer of specialty electronic cable, and Dover Corp., a diversified manufacturer of a wide range of proprietary products. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Rethore is a director of Belden, Inc, a manufacturer of specialty electronic cable, and Dover Corp., a diversified manufacturer of a wide range of proprietary products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS31 | Mister Ripp is currently chairman of the board of LightPath Technologies, Inc, a fiber optic component manufacturer. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Ripp is currently chairman of the board of LightPath Technologies, Inc, a fiber optic component manufacturer.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS32 | If our common stock is delisted by NASDAQ, our common stock may be eligible to trade on an over-the-counter quotation system, such as the OTCQB market, where an investor may find it more difficult to sell our stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
If our common stock is delisted by NASDAQ, our common stock may be eligible to trade on an over-the-counter quotation system, such as the OTCQB market, where an investor may find it more difficult to sell our stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS33 | In connection with this acquisition, Pointes banking subsidiary Pointe Bank was merged into Mercantile Bank. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In connection with this acquisition, Pointes banking subsidiary Pointe Bank was merged into Mercantile Bank.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS34 | Additionally, many smaller privately-held companies compete in this space, including CrownPeak, Clickability, Ektron, PaperThin, and FatWire. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Additionally, many smaller privately-held companies compete in this space, including CrownPeak, Clickability, Ektron, PaperThin, and FatWire.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS35 | Some of our principal competitors in the sale of temperature-management products are Trio-Tech International, Thermonics and ERS Elektronik GmbH. In order to remain competitive with these and other companies, we must be able to continue to commit a significant portion of our personnel, financial resources, research and development and customer support to developing new products and maintaining customer satisfaction worldwide. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Some of our principal competitors in the sale of temperature-management products are Trio-Tech International, Thermonics and ERS Elektronik GmbH. In order to remain competitive with these and other companies, we must be able to continue to commit a significant portion of our personnel, financial resources, research and development and customer support to developing new products and maintaining customer satisfaction worldwide.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS36 | In February 2012 we announced a global partnership with Zynga, Inc (Zynga) which provides Hasbro with the rights to develop a wide range of game and toy products based on Zyngas social network gaming brands, which currently include FARMVILLE, CITYVILLE and WORDS WITH FRIENDS. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In February 2012 we announced a global partnership with Zynga, Inc (Zynga) which provides Hasbro with the rights to develop a wide range of game and toy products based on Zyngas social network gaming brands, which currently include FARMVILLE, CITYVILLE and WORDS WITH FRIENDS.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS37 | Mister Lemaster also held senior sales and marketing leadership positions in the Peripheral and Interventional Cardiology space at ACIST Medical Systems and at Boston Scientific Corporation from 1997 to 2014. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Lemaster also held senior sales and marketing leadership positions in the Peripheral and Interventional Cardiology space at ACIST Medical Systems and at Boston Scientific Corporation from 1997 to 2014.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS38 | Corresponding expenses are included in Clayton Homes and NetJets results. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Corresponding expenses are included in Clayton Homes and NetJets results.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS39 | Collaborations, Partnerships and Agreements Amgen On August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a global agreement (the Amgen Agreement) with Amgen for the development and commercialization of the Companys ADXS-NEO, a novel, preclinical investigational immunotherapy, using the Companys proprietary Listeria monocytogenes attenuated bacterial vector which activates a patients immune system to respond against unique mutations, or neoepitopes, contained in and identified from an individual patients tumor. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Collaborations, Partnerships and Agreements Amgen On August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a global agreement (the Amgen Agreement) with Amgen for the development and commercialization of the Companys ADXS-NEO, a novel, preclinical investigational immunotherapy, using the Companys proprietary Listeria monocytogenes attenuated bacterial vector which activates a patients immune system to respond against unique mutations, or neoepitopes, contained in and identified from an individual patients tumor.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS40 | Competition Numerous providers, including Delta Electronics, Inc, iGo, Inc, Belkin, Kensington, and American Power Conversion, sell products that compete directly with our ChargeSource products. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Competition Numerous providers, including Delta Electronics, Inc, iGo, Inc, Belkin, Kensington, and American Power Conversion, sell products that compete directly with our ChargeSource products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS41 | Widely published author of over 300 articles and seven books Holds approximately 60 U.S. and many foreign patents Member of trustees and advisory boards of three universities Member of the Board of Directors of:-Integrated Device Technology, Inc (a NASDAQ company that develops mixed signal semiconductor solutions) from 2005 to 2009 - Therma-Wave, Inc (a NASDAQ company that manufactured process control metrology systems for use in semiconductor manufacturing) from 2004 to 2007 Significant experience with technology innovation and the process ofnew product introduction including the OLEV (Online Electric Vehicle), an invention selected by TIME magazine as one of the 50 most promising new inventions of 2010 Relevant network, particularly in the Korean community Relevant experience with Korean culture and commerce Papken der Torossian, 74 2003 Chief Executive Officer of SVGI, (publicly-held designer and builder of semiconductor capital equipment tools for chip manufacturers) from 1986 to 2001 Prior to SVGI, was President and Chief Executive Officer of ECS Microsystems (communications and PC company acquired by Ampex Corporation) and President of the Santa Cruz Division of Plantronics where he also served as Vice President of the telephone products group Has served as a director on a number of private company boards including executive chairman of Vistec Semiconductor Systems Group Member of the Board of Directors and the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of Atmel Corporation (a NASDAQ company that is a global leader in the design, manufacturing and marketing of advanced semiconductors ) from July 2007 to present Member of the Board of Directors of Therma-Wave, Inc (a NASDAQ company that manufactured process control metrology systems for use in semiconductor manufacturing) from2003 to 2007 Extensive experience as chairman and chief executive of a number of semiconductor and technology-based companies Relevant network in technology community Relevant operating experience with small, high growth companies 52 Executive Officers In addition to Jeffrey Parker, our Chief Executive Officer, and David Sorrells, our Chief Technology Officer, who also serve on our board and whose backgrounds are included in the table above, the following persons serve as our executive officers: Name, Age Position Background Cynthia Poehlman, 46 Chief Financial Officer Our Chief Financial Officer since June 2004 and Corporate Secretary since August 2007 Our Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from March 1994 to June 2004 Certified Public Accountant in the state of Florida since 1989 John Stuckey, 42 Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business Development Our Executive Vice President since June 2008 Our Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business Development from July 2004 to June 2008 Director of Business Development at Thomson, Inc prior to July 2004. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Widely published author of over 300 articles and seven books Holds approximately 60 U.S. and many foreign patents Member of trustees and advisory boards of three universities Member of the Board of Directors of:-Integrated Device Technology, Inc (a NASDAQ company that develops mixed signal semiconductor solutions) from 2005 to 2009 - Therma-Wave, Inc (a NASDAQ company that manufactured process control metrology systems for use in semiconductor manufacturing) from 2004 to 2007 Significant experience with technology innovation and the process ofnew product introduction including the OLEV (Online Electric Vehicle), an invention selected by TIME magazine as one of the 50 most promising new inventions of 2010 Relevant network, particularly in the Korean community Relevant experience with Korean culture and commerce Papken der Torossian, 74 2003 Chief Executive Officer of SVGI, (publicly-held designer and builder of semiconductor capital equipment tools for chip manufacturers) from 1986 to 2001 Prior to SVGI, was President and Chief Executive Officer of ECS Microsystems (communications and PC company acquired by Ampex Corporation) and President of the Santa Cruz Division of Plantronics where he also served as Vice President of the telephone products group Has served as a director on a number of private company boards including executive chairman of Vistec Semiconductor Systems Group Member of the Board of Directors and the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of Atmel Corporation (a NASDAQ company that is a global leader in the design, manufacturing and marketing of advanced semiconductors ) from July 2007 to present Member of the Board of Directors of Therma-Wave, Inc (a NASDAQ company that manufactured process control metrology systems for use in semiconductor manufacturing) from2003 to 2007 Extensive experience as chairman and chief executive of a number of semiconductor and technology-based companies Relevant network in technology community Relevant operating experience with small, high growth companies 52 Executive Officers In addition to Jeffrey Parker, our Chief Executive Officer, and David Sorrells, our Chief Technology Officer, who also serve on our board and whose backgrounds are included in the table above, the following persons serve as our executive officers: Name, Age Position Background Cynthia Poehlman, 46 Chief Financial Officer Our Chief Financial Officer since June 2004 and Corporate Secretary since August 2007 Our Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from March 1994 to June 2004 Certified Public Accountant in the state of Florida since 1989 John Stuckey, 42 Executive Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business Development Our Executive Vice President since June 2008 Our Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business Development from July 2004 to June 2008 Director of Business Development at Thomson, Inc prior to July 2004.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS42 | Our primary competitors for online sales of products include eBay, Amazon.com, Buy.com, AOL.com, Yahoo Shopping, Craigslist.com, Google Base and Oodle.com. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Our primary competitors for online sales of products include eBay, Amazon.com, Buy.com, AOL.com, Yahoo Shopping, Craigslist.com, Google Base and Oodle.com.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS43 | We face competition from major, brand name pharmaceutical companies as well as generic manufacturers such as Hospira, Inc, Bedford Laboratories, Baxter Laboratories (including Elkin-Sinn), SICOR Inc (acquired by Teva Pharmceuticals USA) and Mayne Pharma (acquired by Hospira, Inc) and, in the future, increased competition from new, foreign competitors. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We face competition from major, brand name pharmaceutical companies as well as generic manufacturers such as Hospira, Inc, Bedford Laboratories, Baxter Laboratories (including Elkin-Sinn), SICOR Inc (acquired by Teva Pharmceuticals USA) and Mayne Pharma (acquired by Hospira, Inc) and, in the future, increased competition from new, foreign competitors.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS44 | In addition to serving on the boards of a number of Riverstone portfolio companies and their affiliates, Mister Alexander is a director of EP Energy Corporation since September 2013 and is on the Board of the general partner of Enviva Partners,LP, which had an IPO in 2015. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition to serving on the boards of a number of Riverstone portfolio companies and their affiliates, Mister Alexander is a director of EP Energy Corporation since September 2013 and is on the Board of the general partner of Enviva Partners,LP, which had an IPO in 2015.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS45 | Mister O'Reilly serves as a Director of the Neiman Marcus Group and Teradyne, Inc Doctor Sorenson has served as a Director of the Company since March 1989. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister O'Reilly serves as a Director of the Neiman Marcus Group and Teradyne, Inc Doctor Sorenson has served as a Director of the Company since March 1989.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS46 | In 2009, preopening expense related to the following items: $16.1 million for our Echelon development project; $1.4 million for the new hotel at Blue Chip; and $0.3 million for other projects. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2009, preopening expense related to the following items: $16.1 million for our Echelon development project; $1.4 million for the new hotel at Blue Chip; and $0.3 million for other projects.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS47 | Proposed Merger with AXA Financial, Inc: On September 17, 2003, MONY Group entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with AXA Financial, Inc (AXA Financial), and AIMA Acquisition Co. (AIMA), which was subsequently amended on February22,2004 (hereafter referred to collectively as the AXA Agreement), pursuant to which MONY Group will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial in a cash transaction valued at approximately $1.5billion. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Proposed Merger with AXA Financial, Inc: On September 17, 2003, MONY Group entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with AXA Financial, Inc (AXA Financial), and AIMA Acquisition Co. (AIMA), which was subsequently amended on February22,2004 (hereafter referred to collectively as the AXA Agreement), pursuant to which MONY Group will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial in a cash transaction valued at approximately $1.5billion.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS48 | Incnnection with the Stock Purchase, Euradius Acquisition Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Parent, sold all ofthe outstanding stock of Euradius International Dutch Bidco B.V. (Euradius) to Giraffe. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Incnnection with the Stock Purchase, Euradius Acquisition Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Parent, sold all ofthe outstanding stock of Euradius International Dutch Bidco B.V. (Euradius) to Giraffe.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS49 | The multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted within a network of approximately 25 sites under the direction of the NCI funded Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP). | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted within a network of approximately 25 sites under the direction of the NCI funded Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP).
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS50 | Should we not successfully transition end customers currently purchasing product from Arrow Electronics to purchasing product from Avnet or other Company franchised distributors, such customers might begin purchasing our competitors products. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Should we not successfully transition end customers currently purchasing product from Arrow Electronics to purchasing product from Avnet or other Company franchised distributors, such customers might begin purchasing our competitors products.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS51 | The following table shows the high and low sale prices per share for the common stock as reported by NASDAQ: Fiscal 2008 Quarter Ended June 29 March 30 December 29 September 29 Market Price: High $ .009 $ .006 $ .007 $ .024 Low $ .003 $ .003 $ .002 $ .004 (a) As of June 27, 2008, there were approximately 291 record holders of our Common Stock. ( | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The following table shows the high and low sale prices per share for the common stock as reported by NASDAQ: Fiscal 2008 Quarter Ended June 29 March 30 December 29 September 29 Market Price: High $ .009 $ .006 $ .007 $ .024 Low $ .003 $ .003 $ .002 $ .004 (a) As of June 27, 2008, there were approximately 291 record holders of our Common Stock. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS52 | c) Non-U.S. Benefit Plans VWR has defined benefit pension plans at various foreign subsidiaries. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
c) Non-U.S. Benefit Plans VWR has defined benefit pension plans at various foreign subsidiaries.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS53 | The Adviser has voluntarily waived the Incntive Fees attributable to pre-Incntive Fee net investment income accrued by us as a result of our ownership of the TICC Shares for any period in which TICC Capital Corp. remains our portfolio company. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Adviser has voluntarily waived the Incntive Fees attributable to pre-Incntive Fee net investment income accrued by us as a result of our ownership of the TICC Shares for any period in which TICC Capital Corp. remains our portfolio company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS54 | This impairment test is performed for each of our segments Energy brokerage and Energy efficiency services which have been determined to be our reporting units. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
This impairment test is performed for each of our segments Energy brokerage and Energy efficiency services which have been determined to be our reporting units.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS55 | As part of the alliance it was agreed that, Veritas DGC would be our exclusive VectorSeis customer within North America, subject to certain minimum utilization requirements of our VectorSeis equipment. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
As part of the alliance it was agreed that, Veritas DGC would be our exclusive VectorSeis customer within North America, subject to certain minimum utilization requirements of our VectorSeis equipment.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS56 | Most notably, the ACC changed the rate treatment of ICFA funds, and ICFA funds already received would no longer be deemed CIAC for rate making purposes. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Most notably, the ACC changed the rate treatment of ICFA funds, and ICFA funds already received would no longer be deemed CIAC for rate making purposes.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS57 | He is also on the board of directors of Range Resources Corporation, a publicly traded natural gas exploration and production company. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
He is also on the board of directors of Range Resources Corporation, a publicly traded natural gas exploration and production company.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS58 | Hotel Zephyr Fisherman's Wharf (1) December 9, 2013 San Francisco, CA 361 20. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Hotel Zephyr Fisherman's Wharf (1) December 9, 2013 San Francisco, CA 361 20.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS59 | Clinical Development Oritavancin has been tested in over 1,650patients and has been the subject of two PhaseIII trials for the indication of cSSSI conducted by Eli Lilly and InterMune, Inc, or InterMune, which transferred oritavancin to Targanta in 2005. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Clinical Development Oritavancin has been tested in over 1,650patients and has been the subject of two PhaseIII trials for the indication of cSSSI conducted by Eli Lilly and InterMune, Inc, or InterMune, which transferred oritavancin to Targanta in 2005.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS60 | Mister Enloe serves as a director of Silicon Laboratories Inc, a designer of mixed-signal integrated circuits, and Live Nation, Inc, a venue operator, promoter and producer of live entertainment events. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Enloe serves as a director of Silicon Laboratories Inc, a designer of mixed-signal integrated circuits, and Live Nation, Inc, a venue operator, promoter and producer of live entertainment events.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS61 | On November 12, 2013, Western purchased all of NTHs interests in NT InterHoldCo LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northern Tier Holdings LLC that holds all of the membership interests in Northern Tier Energy GP LLC, the general partner of Northern Tier Energy LP and 35,622,500 common units representing a 38.7% limited partner interest in Northern Tier Energy LP for a purchase price of $775million. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
On November 12, 2013, Western purchased all of NTHs interests in NT InterHoldCo LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northern Tier Holdings LLC that holds all of the membership interests in Northern Tier Energy GP LLC, the general partner of Northern Tier Energy LP and 35,622,500 common units representing a 38.7% limited partner interest in Northern Tier Energy LP for a purchase price of $775million.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS62 | He has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of CarMax, Inc from 2006 until February 2016 when he ceased to serve as the President. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
He has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of CarMax, Inc from 2006 until February 2016 when he ceased to serve as the President.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS63 | We face competition in our printing business from many printer companies, including the following (listed in alphabetical order): Argox; Avery Dennison; Bixolon; Blue Bamboo; Boca Systems; Brother International; Canon; CIM; Citizen; Cognitive TPG; Custom; Danaher; Datacard; Datamax-ONeil, a unit of Dover Corporation; Dymo, a Newell Rubbermaid Company; Epson; Evolis; Fargo Electronics, a unit of HID Global; Godex; Hewlett-Packard; Hitachi; Honeywell International Inc; Lexmark International; MagiCard; Matica; Microcom; Mitsubishi; NBS Technologies; Nisca; Oki Data; Olympus; Practical Automation; Printronix; Sato; Seiko Instruments; Song Woo Electronics; Sony; Star Micronics; Taiwan Semiconductor; Toshiba TEC; Victor Data Systems; Woosim; and Xerox. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We face competition in our printing business from many printer companies, including the following (listed in alphabetical order): Argox; Avery Dennison; Bixolon; Blue Bamboo; Boca Systems; Brother International; Canon; CIM; Citizen; Cognitive TPG; Custom; Danaher; Datacard; Datamax-ONeil, a unit of Dover Corporation; Dymo, a Newell Rubbermaid Company; Epson; Evolis; Fargo Electronics, a unit of HID Global; Godex; Hewlett-Packard; Hitachi; Honeywell International Inc; Lexmark International; MagiCard; Matica; Microcom; Mitsubishi; NBS Technologies; Nisca; Oki Data; Olympus; Practical Automation; Printronix; Sato; Seiko Instruments; Song Woo Electronics; Sony; Star Micronics; Taiwan Semiconductor; Toshiba TEC; Victor Data Systems; Woosim; and Xerox.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS64 | In recent years, we entered into, and expanded, a strategic alliance with BlackRock, Inc (BlackRock) to combine BlackRocks order flow with our Open Trading solution to improve the range of trading connections available to global credit market participants. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In recent years, we entered into, and expanded, a strategic alliance with BlackRock, Inc (BlackRock) to combine BlackRocks order flow with our Open Trading solution to improve the range of trading connections available to global credit market participants.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS65 | Incuded in our operating income for 2007 are pre-tax charges of $72.0million for in-process research and development acquired in the EndoArt acquisition, a $3.3million charge to cost of sales associated with the combined Esprit and Cornal purchase accounting fair market value inventory adjustment rollouts, $2.3million of expenses associated with the settlement of a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement between Cornal and one of our subsidiaries, total integration and transition costs of $14.7million related to the Esprit, EndoArt, Cornal and Inamed acquisitions, total restructuring charges of $26.8million and a legal settlement cost of $6.4million. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Incuded in our operating income for 2007 are pre-tax charges of $72.0million for in-process research and development acquired in the EndoArt acquisition, a $3.3million charge to cost of sales associated with the combined Esprit and Cornal purchase accounting fair market value inventory adjustment rollouts, $2.3million of expenses associated with the settlement of a pre-existing unfavorable distribution agreement between Cornal and one of our subsidiaries, total integration and transition costs of $14.7million related to the Esprit, EndoArt, Cornal and Inamed acquisitions, total restructuring charges of $26.8million and a legal settlement cost of $6.4million.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS66 | Miss West is a director of Quaker Chemical Corporation (a leading manufacturer and supplier of process fluids and specialty chemicals) where she also serves as a member of its Audit Committee. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Miss West is a director of Quaker Chemical Corporation (a leading manufacturer and supplier of process fluids and specialty chemicals) where she also serves as a member of its Audit Committee.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS67 | When a customer orders a refill prescription to be picked up at a local Rite Aid store, we use Rite Aid as a fulfillment partner. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
When a customer orders a refill prescription to be picked up at a local Rite Aid store, we use Rite Aid as a fulfillment partner.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS68 | We advertise and sponsor motorsports at various levels along with select professional and collegiate sports, such as NFL, NBA and MLB teams, and SEC and ACC college athletic programs, among others, whose fan base, match our customer demographic. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We advertise and sponsor motorsports at various levels along with select professional and collegiate sports, such as NFL, NBA and MLB teams, and SEC and ACC college athletic programs, among others, whose fan base, match our customer demographic.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS69 | We extended our 20+ year alliance with Hewlett Packard Enterprise and entered into a three-year strategic partnership agreement to extend our leadership in the secure delivery of apps and data by building innovative solutions and services leveraging the full Citrix software stack and our cloud solution. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We extended our 20+ year alliance with Hewlett Packard Enterprise and entered into a three-year strategic partnership agreement to extend our leadership in the secure delivery of apps and data by building innovative solutions and services leveraging the full Citrix software stack and our cloud solution.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS70 | For example, Celgene is currently commercializing and/or developing certain of its existing products, including lenalidomide and azacitidine, for certain MDS patients for which luspatercept is also being developed. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For example, Celgene is currently commercializing and/or developing certain of its existing products, including lenalidomide and azacitidine, for certain MDS patients for which luspatercept is also being developed.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS71 | Military platforms include aircraft such as the Boeing AH-64 Apache, CH-47, C17 Chinook, F-15, F-18, KC46 Tanker, P-8 and V-22, the Airbus A400M, the Lockheed Martin C-130J, F-16 and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter, the Northrop Grumman E-2C Hawkeye, the General Atomics Predator Doctor ne and the Raytheon Patriot Missile. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Military platforms include aircraft such as the Boeing AH-64 Apache, CH-47, C17 Chinook, F-15, F-18, KC46 Tanker, P-8 and V-22, the Airbus A400M, the Lockheed Martin C-130J, F-16 and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter, the Northrop Grumman E-2C Hawkeye, the General Atomics Predator Doctor ne and the Raytheon Patriot Missile.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS72 | We currently compete with test equipment manufacturers such as Agilent Technologies, Spirent Communications, and Anritsu. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We currently compete with test equipment manufacturers such as Agilent Technologies, Spirent Communications, and Anritsu.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS73 | We currently compete with large, well-established multi-solution enterprise software vendors, such as Microsoft, IBM and salesforce.com, inc., | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We currently compete with large, well-established multi-solution enterprise software vendors, such as Microsoft, IBM and salesforce.com, inc.,
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS74 | Shareholders received a dividend of one share of Certegy stock for each two shares of Equifax stock owned. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Shareholders received a dividend of one share of Certegy stock for each two shares of Equifax stock owned.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS75 | In 2011, our effective income tax rate of 25.8% was positively impacted primarily from the utilization of capital losses to offset nearly all of the $132.2 capital gain realized from the Facebook transaction. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In 2011, our effective income tax rate of 25.8% was positively impacted primarily from the utilization of capital losses to offset nearly all of the $132.2 capital gain realized from the Facebook transaction.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS76 | Prior to joining Equinix, Mister Lillie held several executive-level roles at VeriSign, Inc, a provider of intelligent infrastructure services, including Vice President of global information systems and Vice President of global sales operations. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Prior to joining Equinix, Mister Lillie held several executive-level roles at VeriSign, Inc, a provider of intelligent infrastructure services, including Vice President of global information systems and Vice President of global sales operations.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS77 | We may not be able to successfully or sufficiently differentiate our products from those offered by Microsoft, and Microsofts continued efforts in the application server, integration and Web Services markets and their proposed .NET alternative to Java could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
We may not be able to successfully or sufficiently differentiate our products from those offered by Microsoft, and Microsofts continued efforts in the application server, integration and Web Services markets and their proposed .NET alternative to Java could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS78 | Overview of Select Licensing Partnerships for Approved Products Neulasta, Agreement with Amgen, Inc In July 1995, we entered into a non-exclusive supply and license agreement (1995 Agreement) with Amgen, Inc, pursuant to which we licensed our proprietary PEGylation technology to be used in the development and manufacture of Neulasta. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Overview of Select Licensing Partnerships for Approved Products Neulasta, Agreement with Amgen, Inc In July 1995, we entered into a non-exclusive supply and license agreement (1995 Agreement) with Amgen, Inc, pursuant to which we licensed our proprietary PEGylation technology to be used in the development and manufacture of Neulasta.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS79 | The model uses three year historical volatilities and correlations for all companies in the pre-defined peer group, including Duke Energy, to simulate Duke Energys relative TSR as of the end of the performance period. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The model uses three year historical volatilities and correlations for all companies in the pre-defined peer group, including Duke Energy, to simulate Duke Energys relative TSR as of the end of the performance period.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS80 | Net loss from Continuing Operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc Common Stockholders The following table sets forth computations for our net loss from continuing operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc common stockholders (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2009 2008 Net loss from continuing operations, including income tax expense $ (34,956 ) $ (14,519 ) Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in Regulus Therapeutics Inc 4,394 4,734 Net loss from continuing operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc common stockholders $ (30,562 ) $ (9,785 ) Net loss from continuing operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $30.6 million, compared to $9.8 million for 2008. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Net loss from Continuing Operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc Common Stockholders The following table sets forth computations for our net loss from continuing operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc common stockholders (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2009 2008 Net loss from continuing operations, including income tax expense $ (34,956 ) $ (14,519 ) Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in Regulus Therapeutics Inc 4,394 4,734 Net loss from continuing operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc common stockholders $ (30,562 ) $ (9,785 ) Net loss from continuing operations attributable to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $30.6 million, compared to $9.8 million for 2008.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS81 | Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Incand Subsidiary Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Goodwill and other Intangible Assets Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Incand Subsidiary Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Goodwill and other Intangible Assets Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS82 | Interchange rates are set by MasterCard International Inc (MasterCard) and Visa U.S.A. Inc (Visa) and are based on cardholder purchase volumes. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Interchange rates are set by MasterCard International Inc (MasterCard) and Visa U.S.A. Inc (Visa) and are based on cardholder purchase volumes.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS83 | Major Customers We have four operators, an affiliate of Holiday Retirement ("Holiday"), Senior Living Communities, LLC ("Senior Living"), National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) and Bickford Senior Living ("Bickford"), from whom we individually derive at least 10% of our income. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Major Customers We have four operators, an affiliate of Holiday Retirement ("Holiday"), Senior Living Communities, LLC ("Senior Living"), National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) and Bickford Senior Living ("Bickford"), from whom we individually derive at least 10% of our income.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS84 | Rather, the private letter ruling is based upon representations by Acuity Brands that those requirements have been satisfied, and any inaccuracy in those representations could invalidate the ruling. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Rather, the private letter ruling is based upon representations by Acuity Brands that those requirements have been satisfied, and any inaccuracy in those representations could invalidate the ruling.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS85 | For examples, payment processors Europay, MasterCard and Visa, or EMV, set a deadline of October 2015 for retailers to install and implement in their point-of-sale systems new terminals that would accept credit and debit cards that have an imbedded chip on them. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
For examples, payment processors Europay, MasterCard and Visa, or EMV, set a deadline of October 2015 for retailers to install and implement in their point-of-sale systems new terminals that would accept credit and debit cards that have an imbedded chip on them.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS86 | Interest rates for certain premium-rate NOW and money market savings accounts are expected to vary to the full extent of any increase or decrease in market interest rates. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Interest rates for certain premium-rate NOW and money market savings accounts are expected to vary to the full extent of any increase or decrease in market interest rates.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS87 | Seritage Growth Properties, or Seritage, a public REIT recently formed by Sears, now holds Sears' interest in the joint venture. | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Seritage Growth Properties, or Seritage, a public REIT recently formed by Sears, now holds Sears' interest in the joint venture.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS88 | It is also possible that we will face competition from new competitors. These include large independent software companies offering personal computer-based application software solutions, such as Microsoft and Adobe, and from large corporations providing database and content management software solutions, such as IBM, Oracle Corporation and EMC Software. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
It is also possible that we will face competition from new competitors. These include large independent software companies offering personal computer-based application software solutions, such as Microsoft and Adobe, and from large corporations providing database and content management software solutions, such as IBM, Oracle Corporation and EMC Software.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS89 | 3) The S&P Aerospace & Defense Index is comprised of The Boeing Company, General Dynamics Corporation, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International Inc, L-3 Communications, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Precision Castparts Corporation, Raytheon Company, Rockwell Collins, Inc, Textron, Inc, and United Technologies Corporation. ( | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
3) The S&P Aerospace & Defense Index is comprised of The Boeing Company, General Dynamics Corporation, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International Inc, L-3 Communications, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Precision Castparts Corporation, Raytheon Company, Rockwell Collins, Inc, Textron, Inc, and United Technologies Corporation. (
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS90 | The fourteen companies included in the Company's first customized peer group are: Carbo Ceramics Inc, Core Laboratories, Doctor sser-Rand Group Inc, Doctor l-Quip Inc, Exterran Holdings Inc, FMC Technologies Inc, Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc, Helmerich & Payne Inc, Key Energy Services Inc, McDermott International Inc, Oceaneering International Inc, RPC Inc, Superior Energy Services Inc and Tidewater Inc The fifteen companies included in the Company's second customized peer group are: Cameron International Corp., Carbo Ceramics Inc, Core Laboratories, Doctor sser-Rand Group Inc, Doctor l-Quip Inc, Exterran Holdings Inc, FMC Technologies Inc, Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc, Helmerich & Payne Inc, Key Energy Services Inc, McDermott International Inc, Oceaneering International Inc, RPC Inc, Superior Energy Services Inc and Tidewater Inc 41 Cumulative Total Return 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The fourteen companies included in the Company's first customized peer group are: Carbo Ceramics Inc, Core Laboratories, Doctor sser-Rand Group Inc, Doctor l-Quip Inc, Exterran Holdings Inc, FMC Technologies Inc, Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc, Helmerich & Payne Inc, Key Energy Services Inc, McDermott International Inc, Oceaneering International Inc, RPC Inc, Superior Energy Services Inc and Tidewater Inc The fifteen companies included in the Company's second customized peer group are: Cameron International Corp., Carbo Ceramics Inc, Core Laboratories, Doctor sser-Rand Group Inc, Doctor l-Quip Inc, Exterran Holdings Inc, FMC Technologies Inc, Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc, Helmerich & Payne Inc, Key Energy Services Inc, McDermott International Inc, Oceaneering International Inc, RPC Inc, Superior Energy Services Inc and Tidewater Inc 41 Cumulative Total Return 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS91 | ACE's operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations, relating to air quality, water quality, spill prevention, waste management, natural resources, site remediation, and health and safety. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
ACE's operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations, relating to air quality, water quality, spill prevention, waste management, natural resources, site remediation, and health and safety.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS92 | The Company has formed significant strategic alliances with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Teva), AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc (AMAG) and Pfizer Inc (Pfizer.) | alliance | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The Company has formed significant strategic alliances with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Teva), AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc (AMAG) and Pfizer Inc (Pfizer.)
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 3 |
FSRCS93 | The first group of competitors consists of larger, national health plans and insurers such as Aetna, Blue Cross/Blue Shield plans, Cigna, Humana, and United HealthCare. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The first group of competitors consists of larger, national health plans and insurers such as Aetna, Blue Cross/Blue Shield plans, Cigna, Humana, and United HealthCare.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS94 | In addition, there are also a number of larger companies which have targeted Web-based catalogs for procurement, such as Ariba, Commerce One, and i2 Technologies, Inc, which could expand their offerings to address the needs of our markets and become competitors in the future. | competition | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
In addition, there are also a number of larger companies which have targeted Web-based catalogs for procurement, such as Ariba, Commerce One, and i2 Technologies, Inc, which could expand their offerings to address the needs of our markets and become competitors in the future.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 0 |
FSRCS95 | Standard transportation volumes and revenues relate to large volumetric customers that are billed using standard transportation tariffs instead of the monthly service fees used for the ATS program. | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Standard transportation volumes and revenues relate to large volumetric customers that are billed using standard transportation tariffs instead of the monthly service fees used for the ATS program.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
FSRCS96 | Trust Preferred Subsidiaries:In connection with the March 5, 2004 PCCI acquisition, Bancorp added three business trust subsidiaries which had been originally created by PCCI for the exclusive purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. | own | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Trust Preferred Subsidiaries:In connection with the March 5, 2004 PCCI acquisition, Bancorp added three business trust subsidiaries which had been originally created by PCCI for the exclusive purpose of issuing trust preferred securities.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 4 |
FSRCS97 | Doctor Berelowitz also serves on the board of directors of Recro Pharma Inc and of Kamada Ltd., two NASDAQ-listed pharmaceutical companies. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Doctor Berelowitz also serves on the board of directors of Recro Pharma Inc and of Kamada Ltd., two NASDAQ-listed pharmaceutical companies.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS98 | Mister Tisch also serves as a director of CNA Financial Corporation, a subsidiary of Loews, and is Chairman of the Board of K12 Inc Mister Tischs qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience on the board of our parent company, his extensive leadership skills and keen business and financial judgment, as well as his role in forming the Partnership. | pc | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
Mister Tisch also serves as a director of CNA Financial Corporation, a subsidiary of Loews, and is Chairman of the Board of K12 Inc Mister Tischs qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience on the board of our parent company, his extensive leadership skills and keen business and financial judgment, as well as his role in forming the Partnership.
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 2 |
FSRCS99 | The following table sets forth certain information about our existing company-owned restaurant locations, sorted by opening date, as of January2, 2005: Square Interior Owned Location Footage Seats or Leased Date Opened 1 Roseville, MN 4,800 105 Leased June 1996 2 Calhoun Square (Minneapolis, MN) 10,500 380 Leased September 1996 3 Maple Grove, MN 5,200 125 Owned (1) April 1997 4 Highland Park (St. Paul, MN) 5,200 125 Leased June 1997 5 Stillwater, MN 5,200 130 Owned (1) July 1997 6 Apple Valley, MN 3,800 90 Owned (1) July 1997 7 Forest Lake, MN 4,500 100 Leased October 1997 8 Minnetonka, MN 5,500 140 Owned (2) December 1997 9 Plymouth, MN 2,100 20 Leased December 1997 10 West St. Paul, MN 6,800 140 Leased January 1998 11 West Des Moines, IA 5,500 150 Leased April 1998 12 Des Moines, IA 5,800 150 Leased April 1998 13 Naperville, IL 5,500 170 Leased April 1998 14 Cedar Falls, IA 5,400 130 Leased September 1998 15 Bloomington, MN 5,400 140 Leased October 1998 16 Woodbury, MN 5,900 180 Owned (2) October 1998 17 Lincoln, NE 6,300 190 Owned (2) December 1999 18 Columbia, MD 7,200 270 Leased January 2000 19 Annapolis, MD 7,000 210 Leased January 2000 20 Frederick, MD 5,600 180 Leased January 2000 21 Woodbridge, VA 5,600 190 Leased January 2000 22 Vernon Hills, IL 6,600 230 Leased February 2000 23 Addison, IL 4,600 140 Owned (2) March 2000 24 Lombard, IL 7,200 250 Leased July 2000 25 North Riverside, IL 5,000 160 Leased August 2000 26 Sterling, VA 5,200 200 Leased December 2000 27 Carpentersville, IL 6,000 227 Leased February 2001 28 Streamwood, IL 7,200 260 Leased March 2001 29 Oakton, VA 4,300 150 Leased May 2001 30 Laurel, MD 5,200 170 Leased August 2001 31 Palatine, IL 7,200 260 Leased August 2001 32 Richmond I (Richmond, VA) 5,200 165 Owned (2) December 2001 33 Gaithersburg, MD 4,800 170 Leased May 2002 34 Richmond II (Richmond, VA) 5,100 165 Owned (2) June 2002 35 Orland Park, IL 5,000 165 Leased June 2002 36 Tulsa, OK 4,900 180 Owned (2) September 2002 37 Virginia Commons, VA 5,300 190 Owned (2) June 2003 38 Rogers, AR 5,300 190 Owned June 2003 All seat count and square footage amounts are approximate (1) Restaurant is collateral in a sale-leaseback financing (2) Restaurant is subject to a mortgag | no label | Examine the given statement from a financial domain, focusing on its implications for firm social relationships. Assess whether the statement indicates an 'alliance,' suggesting a partnership or cooperative effort between firms. If it points to 'PC' (Principal-Client), consider it as indicating a relationship where one party provides a service or product to another. Look for signs of 'competition,' which would imply rivalry or competitive interactions between firms. Determine if it reflects 'own,' indicating an internal or self-referential aspect of the firm. If the statement does not fit any of these categories, classify it as 'no label.' Conclude your analysis by identifying the most appropriate term - alliance, PC, competition, own, or no label - that resonates with the statement's context in firm social relationships.
The following table sets forth certain information about our existing company-owned restaurant locations, sorted by opening date, as of January2, 2005: Square Interior Owned Location Footage Seats or Leased Date Opened 1 Roseville, MN 4,800 105 Leased June 1996 2 Calhoun Square (Minneapolis, MN) 10,500 380 Leased September 1996 3 Maple Grove, MN 5,200 125 Owned (1) April 1997 4 Highland Park (St. Paul, MN) 5,200 125 Leased June 1997 5 Stillwater, MN 5,200 130 Owned (1) July 1997 6 Apple Valley, MN 3,800 90 Owned (1) July 1997 7 Forest Lake, MN 4,500 100 Leased October 1997 8 Minnetonka, MN 5,500 140 Owned (2) December 1997 9 Plymouth, MN 2,100 20 Leased December 1997 10 West St. Paul, MN 6,800 140 Leased January 1998 11 West Des Moines, IA 5,500 150 Leased April 1998 12 Des Moines, IA 5,800 150 Leased April 1998 13 Naperville, IL 5,500 170 Leased April 1998 14 Cedar Falls, IA 5,400 130 Leased September 1998 15 Bloomington, MN 5,400 140 Leased October 1998 16 Woodbury, MN 5,900 180 Owned (2) October 1998 17 Lincoln, NE 6,300 190 Owned (2) December 1999 18 Columbia, MD 7,200 270 Leased January 2000 19 Annapolis, MD 7,000 210 Leased January 2000 20 Frederick, MD 5,600 180 Leased January 2000 21 Woodbridge, VA 5,600 190 Leased January 2000 22 Vernon Hills, IL 6,600 230 Leased February 2000 23 Addison, IL 4,600 140 Owned (2) March 2000 24 Lombard, IL 7,200 250 Leased July 2000 25 North Riverside, IL 5,000 160 Leased August 2000 26 Sterling, VA 5,200 200 Leased December 2000 27 Carpentersville, IL 6,000 227 Leased February 2001 28 Streamwood, IL 7,200 260 Leased March 2001 29 Oakton, VA 4,300 150 Leased May 2001 30 Laurel, MD 5,200 170 Leased August 2001 31 Palatine, IL 7,200 260 Leased August 2001 32 Richmond I (Richmond, VA) 5,200 165 Owned (2) December 2001 33 Gaithersburg, MD 4,800 170 Leased May 2002 34 Richmond II (Richmond, VA) 5,100 165 Owned (2) June 2002 35 Orland Park, IL 5,000 165 Leased June 2002 36 Tulsa, OK 4,900 180 Owned (2) September 2002 37 Virginia Commons, VA 5,300 190 Owned (2) June 2003 38 Rogers, AR 5,300 190 Owned June 2003 All seat count and square footage amounts are approximate (1) Restaurant is collateral in a sale-leaseback financing (2) Restaurant is subject to a mortgag
Answer: | [
"competition",
"no label",
"pc",
"alliance",
"own"
] | 1 |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 7